HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-10-31 Eric B Testimony -GP 2045From:Eric B
To:WPCtestimony
Subject:Testimony On Hawaii General Plan 2045 (New Biz)
Date:Thursday, October 31, 2024 1:30:20 PM
There is much more details in a PDF that others will be sending in, but here are some serious concerns, if
any parts of the Hawaii General Plan 2045 "Violate or go against the Constitution" it is illegal and deemed
null and void.
Eric Bjerke
Here are a some reasons why:
It is too vague. The language is not clear what the plan wishes to accomplish. There are MANY
concerning sections that sound like rights, freedoms, and property are at risk with this plan.
Page 111, section 17.4: "Land use application shall identify as early as possible any existing or
potential active living corridors that should be incorporated into the counties open space
network." This sounds like you'll be looking at people's property to take for open space because
they apply for land use. That is not Pono and is an invasion of privacy!
2.2 Biocultural Stewardship Goal (1.13): "Incentive private land management practices that
enhance natural resources and values and when appropriate pursue the acquisitions of lands for
the protections of natural resources." We've seen your incentives like the tax incentives on Maui,
which is costing people thousands if they don't do what the government wants. You want to
acquire land to protect natural resources and values. Who gets to decide what are natural
resources and values? Whose values are they? Why do you think it's your right to "pursue"
acquiring someone's private property?!!
You have an entire section on climate change that looks to take away many freedoms and rights.
Did you know there are close to 2K credentialed scientists from around the world that state there is
no climate danger? https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/ The reason for this narrative is the
change these policies will create will increase the pocket book of investors in renewable energy as
it reduces freedoms for the general population.
Page 116, 19.7: "Concurrency reviews should incorporate reduction in vehicle miles traveled to
mitigate traffic impacts and achieve sustainability and demand management goals." The
Constitution says we have the right to travel! It is not the right of the Planning department to
"demand" that your management goals reduce that right! Anything that reads, "Reduce vehicle
miles traveled" should be removed from this plan!