Laserfiche WebLink
From: Danica Ann Barretto <br /> To: WPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Given at 11-1 mtg Testimony On Hawaii General Plan 2045(New Biz) <br /> Date: Thursday,October 31,2024 1:53:25 PM <br /> This General Plan needs to be thrown out and redone! <br /> Here are a some reasons why: <br /> • It is too vague. The language is not clear what the plan wishes to accomplish. There are <br /> MANY concerning sections that sound like rights, freedoms, and property are at risk with this <br /> plan. <br /> • Page 111, section 17.4: "Land use application shall identify as early as possible any existing <br /> or potential active living corridors that should be incorporated into the counties open space <br /> network."This sounds like you'll be looking at people's property to take for open space <br /> because they apply for land use. That is not Pono and is an invasion of privacy! <br /> • 2.2 Biocultural Stewardship Goal (1.13): "Incentive private land management practices that <br /> enhance natural resources and values and when appropriate pursue the acquisitions of lands <br /> for the protections of natural resources."We've seen your incentives like the tax incentives on <br /> Maui, which is costing people thousands if they don't do what the government wants. You <br /> want to acquire land to protect natural resources and values. Who gets to decide what are <br /> natural resources and values? Whose values are they? Why do you think it's your right to <br /> "pursue" acquiring someone's private property?!! <br /> • You have an entire section on climate change that looks to take away many freedoms and <br /> rights. Did you know there are close to 2K credentialed scientists from around the world that <br /> state there is no climate danger? https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/The reason for <br /> this narrative is the change these policies will create will increase the pocket book of investors <br /> in renewable energy as it reduces freedoms for the general population. <br /> • Page 116, 19.7: "Concurrency reviews should incorporate reduction in vehicle miles traveled <br /> to mitigate traffic impacts and achieve sustainability and demand management goals."The <br /> Constitution says we have the right to travel! It is not the right of the Planning department to <br /> "demand" that your management goals reduce that right! Anything that reads, "Reduce vehicle <br /> miles traveled" should be removed from this plan! <br /> Please take a look at this pdf that shares a lot more issues with this general plan. <br /> https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/ files/ugd/86fc0c_b34739e4c99c461685de4c0207bf286e.pdf <br /> This General Plan must be redone with the people and the feature keiki in mind, which this plan <br /> does not do! <br /> Thank you, <br /> Danica Barretto <br />