Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-03-09 Donna ThompsonFrom:sharkgss To:LPCtestimony; Council Testimony; Kimball, Heather; Kagiwada, Jennifer; Onishi, Dennis; Kierkiewicz, Ashley; Kanealii-Kleinfelder, Matt; Villegas, Rebecca; Galimba, Michelle M.; Inaba, Holeka;Hustace, James; cohmayor@hawaiicounty.govSubject:THE PEOPLE OPPPOSE 2045 GENERAL PLAN Date:Sunday, March 9, 2025 10:01:00 PM Aloha, I strongly encourage each of you to NOT recommend this plan go thru, reverting to the 2005 plan which is in better alignment with the needs of our county until a satisfactory document can be agreed upon by the people. There are numerous issues with the 2045 Plan itself outlined in hundreds of in person and written testimonies. The public is 100% against it since it is a violation of privacy rights, based on junk science, fails to address critical issues, written for stakeholders, and is an outright overreach of government which severely restricts land usage. This plan is based off a template handed down thru the United Nations Agenda 21. This document is a good overview to educate county planning and legislative officials on AGENDA 21 and should be mandatory reading. This document was provided to the planning commissioners at the last meeting and testifiers have been schooling the planning commissioners on UN Agenda 21 for many months now. If you vote for this plan you are not with the people and are carrying out a plan set up by a foreign non government organization. The 2045 General Plan is a treasonous document that strips rights away while consolidating power to stakeholders. https://nwri.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/How-Public-Officials-can-Recognize-Agenda-21.pdf 1. The proposed re-zoning is excessive overreach for the benefit of stakeholders and will affect landowners tremendously. This will open up the county for massive legal recourse that will tie up county resources for many years. 2. Reference to climate change caused by humans is unproven junk science (see additional resources below). References to "carbon footprint", "net zero", "greenhouse gas", "green infrastructure" and / or "climate adaptation" are not relevant nor is carbon dioxide sequestration which is a really really stupid idea, waste of tax payer funds and energy, and will further degrade our flora and fauna. 3. The State and County corporations are not acting on behalf of its residents and clearly acting on behalf of stakeholders. 4. The word "stakeholder" inserted instead of "land owner" or "farmer/rancher" is highly disturbing. 5. This is a rural county and the needs of the plan should reflect this to include access to meat processing centers. 6. Close down the County Office of Sustainability, Climate, Equity, and Resilience (OSCER) as NOBODY VOTED FOR THIS OFFICE TO BE STARTED and it is a HUGE waste of resources. 7. The governments intention for "inspection" or "surveillance" or "inventory" of land and water catchment is in direct violation of privacy rights. 8. Plan does not include language for safeguarding against the danger of emerging technology, including 5G. Language needs to be drafted regarding technology easements based on health studies conducted by 3rd party with no conflict of interest. 9. "Vision Zero" has NO RELEVANCE for our island. 10. "One Water" refers to a North America group and has NO RELEVANCE for our island. 11. There is no clear plan for strengthening infrastructure and power grid against space weather. 12. The document contains no explanation how the county will handle a breakdown of critical infrastructure (supply chain, energy, communications) due to impending space weather/solar events in which the Federal Government has been diligently preparing for due to weakening magnetosphere (see additional resources below). 13. Ban "man made" weather modification, spraying of nano particulate in the atmosphere, and geoengineering activities that have a significant impact on health, property, and the environment. 14. Focus on harmful chemicals, pesticides such as glyphosate, and genetically altered organisms (including vectors of disease) from being released into the environment. 15. Implement severe restrictions for artificial intelligence data centers proposed by "stakeholders" that will FURTHER drain the power grid. 16. Implement provisions regarding military training and operations that are transparent and safe for the environment. Depleted uranium dropped in the Saddle Region next to an active Volcano is NOT acceptable whatsoever, nor is excessive underground explosions that have been going on for years that parallel training operations at Pōhakuloa Training Area (PTA). 17. Developers should not be granted relief from requirements for sidewalks, bike lanes, etc... a dedicated bike lane should be implemented on all major roads. 18. Include information on the drawbacks of electric vehicles to include draw on the grid, disposal of batteries, and fire dangers. 19. A change from “Extensive Agriculture” to “Natural” would likely signal a serious restriction on private land use and property rights. Below is the direction this plan is taking Hawaii county. 1. Land Use Control & Restrictions on Private Property Extensive Agriculture zoning typically allows for large-scale farming, ranching, and resource production. It suggests that human use of the land is permissible for productive purposes. “Natural” designation, in contrast, often means land is to be “preserved” in a way that limits development, farming, and even human activity— effectively removing it from economic use. This would align with Agenda 21-style policies that push for centralized land control under the justification of sustainability or conservation. 2. “Rewilding” and the Push to Remove Humans from Rural Lands The change in land designation could be part of a larger strategy to push rural landowners off their land under the guise of conservation. Farmers, ranchers, and landowners could lose the ability to develop, expand, or even pass land down to heirs due to severe regulatory burdens. 3. Transfer of Land Rights to Government or Corporate Interests In many cases, when land is reclassified from agricultural to “natural,” it eventually comes under the control of public-private partnerships, land trusts, or global environmental organizations. Property owners may still hold title to the land, but their ability to use it becomes so restricted that it is effectively useless—paving the way for eventual forced sales or government takings. The reduction in agricultural land drives up food costs, weakens local resilience, and increases reliance on imported food sources— which further consolidates power into centralized systems. 4. Legal & Political Implications: “Soft Confiscation” of Private Land A change in zoning creates a backdoor way to strip landowners of functional property rights. It can be seen as a form of regulatory takings, where the government avoids paying compensation for restricting land use but effectively destroys the value of private landholdings. Many landowners don’t even realize the full impact until they attempt to develop, farm, or sell their property and are met with restrictive regulations and red tape. 5. A zoning shift from “Extensive Agriculture” to “Natural” is not just a technical planning change—it is part of a broader Agenda 21 strategy to controlland, reduce human influence, and consolidate power over resources. It restricts land use, weakens property rights, and forces landowners into compliance with centralized, top-down environmental regulations. It limits local food production, making communities dependent on global supply chains. It paves the way for further land grabs under conservation easements, eminent domain, or climate-driven “sustainability”. Climate Mitigation Basis for Plan is Unfounded A great deal of content is based on Climate Mitigation from human activity which has a minuscule effect on the earth's overall climate. Over 99% of the climate affects are driven by solar activity, cycles, and space weather. The document completely fails to mention the threat of space weather and is almost entirely focused on carbon emissions promoted by the United Nations Climate Agenda. Our Federal Government has been preparing for space weather threats for many years, yet the Hawai'i island GP lacks any reference to this even though critical infrastructure (energy, communications, transportation, and supply chain) is at risk due to increased solar radiation from our weakening magnetosphere. In 2015 the magnetosphere was down by 40% according to this Federal Doc. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1040918#:~:text=The%20research%20evaluates%20the%20impacts,reversals%20and%20adverse%20space%20weather In October of 2016 President Obama issued the following executive order Coordinating Efforts To Prepare the Nation for Space Weather Events - Executive order 13744 (https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-201600692 ) Section 1. Policy. Space weather events, in the form of solar flares, solar energetic particles, and geomagnetic disturbances, occur regularly, some with measurable effects on critical infrastructure systems and technologies, such as the Global Positioning System (GPS), satellite operations and communication, aviation, and the electrical power grid. Extreme space weather events—those that could significantly degrade critical infrastructure—could disable large portions of the electrical power grid, resulting in cascading failures that would affect key services such as water supply, healthcare, and transportation. Space weather has the potential to simultaneously affect and disrupt health and safety across entire continents. Successfully preparing for space weather events is an all-of-nation endeavor that requires partnerships across governments, emergency managers, academia, the media, the insurance industry, non-profits, and the private sector. It is the policy of the United States to prepare for space weather events to minimize the extent of economic loss and human hardship. The Federal Government must have (1) the capability to predict and detect a space weather event, (2) the plans and programs necessary to alert the public and private sectors to enable mitigating actions for an impending space weather event, (3) the protection and mitigation plans, protocols, and standards required to reduce risks to critical infrastructure prior to and during a credible threat, and (4) the ability to respond to and recover from the effects of space weather. Executive departments and agencies (agencies) must coordinate their efforts to prepare for the effects of space weather events. Sec. 2. Objectives. This order defines agency roles and responsibilities and directs agencies to take specific actions to prepare the Nation for the hazardous effects of space weather. These activities are to be implemented in conjunction with those identified in the 2015 National Space Weather Action Plan and any subsequent updates. Implementing this order and the Action Plan will require the Federal Government to work across agencies and to develop, as appropriate, enhanced and innovative partnerships with State, tribal, and local governments; academia; non- profits; the private sector; and international partners. These efforts will enhance national preparedness and speed the creation of a space- weather-ready Nation. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/10/18/2016-25290/coordinating-efforts-to-prepare-the-nation-for-space-weather-events In October 2016 (about 10 days before the above executive order was signed) the Russian Government hosted a training event of 40 million civilians, 200,000 emergency rescuers and 50,000 units of equipment from October 4 to October 7, 2016. It took 3 days to do a mock evacuation of 40 million civilians into 5000 bunkers.This was a massive exercise carried out for the first time in modern history. A spokesman said in a statement: “The main goal of the drill is to practice organization of management during civil defense events and emergency and fire management, to check preparedness of management bodies and forces of civil defense on all levels to respond to natural and man-made disasters and to take civil defense measures.” https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/717446/russia-evacuate-40-million-people-emergency-drill-vladimir-putin-ww3 Resources Weather Modification/Geoengineering Man made geoengineering is an operation primarily used to block out solar radiation and create, distribute, and deflect weather systems. Its use over many decades is outside the scope of public knowledge and having significant impacts on our environment/weather to include increased super storms, fires, flooding, droughts, and causing very high levels of aluminum in the soil and tissue samples of all mammals. I personally have tested hundreds of humans and animals and seen very high levels in all hair analysis tests. This is why Monsanto developed aluminum resistant seeds, soil in North America is testing 40,000 times higher rates of aluminum in the last 2 decades. https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/ Tennessee, Texas, Iowa and New Hampshire have recently introduced bills to ban this practice. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2024/03/20/tennessee-senate-passes-bill-banning-chemtrails-what-to-know/73027586007/ Maui county council passed a bill in 2010 to ban geoengineering and this link explains how it is being used to lessen the effects of solar radiation. There has been no public oversight or consent to these projects. http://mauiskywatch.org/info-official-reports/ It is clear based on the above information the governments of the world are preparing for space weather effects due to the weakening magnetic field, therefore it is critical that the county review and adopt their own contingency plan. Hawaii county should implement a ban on geoengineering before soil is too toxic with aluminum and when combined with glyphosate it can cross the blood brain barrier and render our soils inert. These issues are being brought to your attention as a big picture, there are many other concerns that need addressing that have been provided in previous testimony. The GP is a disaster for our environment since it fails to address some of the most critical issues, instead it is abundantly clear it is being used a control mechanism over free men and women designed to consolidate power to the hands of the stakeholders. GP as it stands has no place in Hawaii or anywhere else in the world and will ultimately fail. Supporting this document without understanding its implications would be a grave mistake for the future of this island. Mahalo for your service, Donna Thompson Kamuela, HI Sent with Proton Mail secure email.