The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025-11-18 Ka'ū CDP Meeting Packet County of Hawai‘i KAʻŪ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTION COMMITTEE Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 • Hilo, Hawaiʻi 96720 (808) 961-8288 • Fax (808) 961-8742 C. Kimo Alameda, Ph.D. Mayor David Kuahiwinui Kaʻohinani Mokuhaliʻi Taylor Spurgeon Babette Morrow Jason Masters, Chair Vacant Catherine Williams Kaweni Ibarra Gary Davis NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the following matters to be considered by the Kaʻū Action Committee in accordance with the provisions of Section 92-7, Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS). This meeting will be held in-person at the location listed in this notice and by Interactive Conference Technology (ICT) through Zoom. DATE: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 TIME: 5:00 P.M . – 7:00 P.M. IN PERSON LOCATION: Ocean View Community Center 92-8924 Leilani Circle Ocean View Ocean View, Hawaii 96704 ONLINE/ZOOM: https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/2aUo9-zFRr23PtpbCeTa-Q NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC TESTIMONY: The public may provide oral testimony at the meeting by joining Zoom or attending in-person at the physical location listed above. Although not required, to register in advance for oral testimony please contact staff at cdp@hawaiicounty.gov or (808) 961-8288. Pursuant to Section 92-3, HRS, interested persons who want to provide oral testimony may do so either at the time the committee takes public statements on the agenda, or at the time the specific agenda item is called. Please note that public testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes in length per agenda item. In addition, although not required, to ensure timely delivery of written testimony to committee members, it is requested that written testimony be submitted by 4:30 p.m. at least two business days prior to the meeting via email to cdp@hawaiicounty.gov or in person at the Hilo or Kona Planning Department. When submitting written testimony, please specify for which agenda item written testimony is being submitted. All written testimony will be a part of the public record. NOTICE REGARDING INTERACTIVE CONFERENCE TECHNOLOGY (ICT): A meeting held by ICT shall be automatically recessed for up to 30 minutes to restore communication when audiovisual communication cannot be maintained with all members participating in the meeting or with the in-person location identified in this notice. The meeting may reconvene when either audiovisual communication is restored, or audio-only communication is established after an unsuccessful attempt to restore audiovisual communication. If it is not possible to reconvene the meeting as provided in this subsection within 30 minutes after an interruption to communication, the meeting will be automatically terminated. AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The Committee will consider approving the draft minutes from September 23, 2025. III. PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON AGENDA ITEMS: Pursuant to Section 92-3, HRS, interested persons who want to provide oral testimony may do so now, or at the time the specific agenda item is called. Public testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes in length per agenda item. IV. BUSINESS: 1. Chair and Vice Chair Elections – Discussion and action to elect a Chair and Vice-Chair for the Kaʻū CDP Action Committee for 2026. 2. Hīlea Property Permitted Interaction Group Report – The Hīlea Property Permitted Interaction Group will present its findings on the proposed acquisition. *Note: Committee members may ask clarifying questions, but full discussion will be held at the next meeting. 3. Action Committee Orientation – Planning Department presentation regarding Action Committee scope. 4. Edmund C. Olson Trust No. 2 Highway Project Concept – Presentation and discussion on whether to draft a letter in support of the Edmund C. Olson Trust No. 2 Highway Project Concept. V. PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON MATTERS NOT ON AGENDA – Public testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. (Pursuant to SB 869) VI. THIRD-PARTY REPORTS; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS – The Action Committee may receive and discuss information from third-party reports by any government official not included in a publicly noticed agenda. The Action Committee may only make decisions on matters originally raised by third-party reports from any government official at a later meeting, where the agenda for the meeting gives notice of decision-making on the matter. (Pursuant to SB 405) VII. PROPOSED NEW BUSINESS: Action Committee members will discuss potential agenda items for the next meeting, including revisiting topics from meetings that did not have a quorum. VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS: • The Environmental Notice - Honu‘apo Estuary Wetland Restoration Project – Draft EA (AFNSI): https://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/erp/The_Environmental_Notice/2025-10-08-TEN.pdf • The Environmental Notice – Development of the Kaʻū Cultural Center – Draft EA (AFNSI): https://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/erp/The_Environmental_Notice/2025-11-08-TEN.pdf • The next meeting is tentatively scheduled for January 27, 2025 (location TBD) IX. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: This agenda and all related documents are available in the Planning Department’s Kaʻū Community Development Plan Action Committee folder via the County of Hawaiʻi Public Documents Repository: https://records.hawaiicounty.gov/weblink/1/fol/88959/Row1.aspx. These documents may also be requested from the Planning Department by calling (808) 961- 8288 or emailing cdp@hawaiicounty.gov. The recorded video of this meeting will be uploaded to the Planning Department’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@cohplanningdepartment The purpose of the public hearings is to afford all interested persons a reasonable opportunity to be heard on the above items. A person desiring to submit oral or written testimony shall indicate their name and whether the testimony is on their behalf or as a representative of an organization or individual. Written testimony can be submitted via email or hard copy. Hard copies should include an original and nine copies and be submitted no later than 4:30 p.m. two business days prior to the meeting. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service, other reasonable modification, or language interpretation to access this meeting please contact the Planning Department at (808) 961-8288 or cdp@hawaiicounty.gov as soon as possible, but no later than five business days prior to the meeting date, to arrange for accommodations. If a response is received after the five-business days deadline, we will try to obtain the auxiliary aid/service or accommodation, but we cannot guarantee that the request will be fulfilled. “Other reasonable modification” refers to communication methods or devices for people with disabilities who are mentally and/or physically challenged. Upon request, this notice is available in alternate formats such as large print, Braille, or electronic copy. If you are a lobbyist, you must register with the Hawai‘i County Clerk within five days of becoming a lobbyist. (Article 15, Section 2-91.3(b), Hawai‘i County Code). A lobbyist means, “any individual engaged for pay or other consideration who spends more than five hours in any month or $275 in any six-month period for the purpose of attempting to influence legislative or administrative action by communicating or urging others to communicate with public officials.” (Article 15, Section 2-91.3(a)(6), Hawai‘i County Code). Registration forms and expenditure report documents are available at the Office of the County Clerk-Council, 25 Aupuni Street, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720. KAʻŪ CDP ACTION COMMITTEE JASON MASTERS, Chair Meeting Packet QR Code: KAʻŪ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 ACTION COMMITTEE 2 COUNTY OF HAWAIʻI 3 DRAFT MINUTES 4 September 23, 2025 5 CALL TO ORDER: 6 Chair Masters called the Kaʻū Community Development Plan (CDP) Action Committee (AC) 7 meeting to order at 5:04 p.m. This meeting was held in person at the Ka’ū Gym Multi-8 Purpose Room and online via the Zoom platform. 9 The full YouTube video of this meeting can be found here: 10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChXeA26wWg0 11 ROLL CALL: 12 Members Present (in person): Babette Morrow, Catherine Williams, David Kuahiwinui, 13 Taylor Spurgeon, Gary Davis, and Chair Jason Masters 14 Members Absent: Jesse Ke and Kaweni Ibarra 15 County Staff Present (in person): Maryam Palma and Kawelo Kalili 16 County Staff Present (via Zoom): Jessica Lahip 17 There were approximately thirty (30) members of the public in attendance – (20) in person 18 and (10) via Zoom. 19 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 2:40] 20 Committee Member Catherine Williams moved to approve the minutes with a correction to 21 the Roll Call, noting that Committee Member Babette Morrow was present at the previous 22 meeting. The motion was seconded by Chair Jason Masters and passed unanimously. 23 PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON AGENDA ITEMS: [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 4:13] 24 Leinaʻala Enos provided testimony on Business Item #3 in support of extending hours and 25 adding more bins at the Waiʻōhinu Transfer Station. They also spoke on Business Item #4 26 in support of the Edmund C. Olson Trust No. 2 Highway Project Concept and urged the 27 state to address pedestrian safety near the post office in Nā‘ālehu. [SEE YOUTUBE 28 TIMESTAMP 5:51] 29 BUSINESS: 30 1. Vice Chair Election – Discussion and action to elect a Vice-Chair for the Kaʻū CDP 31 Action Committee for the remainder of 2025. 32 This item was deferred to the next meeting due to committee member absences. 33 2. Hīlea Property Permitted Interaction Group Report – The Hīlea Property 34 Permitted Interaction Group will present its findings on the proposed acquisition. 35 KAʻŪ CDP ACTION COMMITTEE Minutes of July 22, 2025 2 *Note: Committee members may ask clarifying questions, but full discussion will be 36 held at the next meeting. 37 This item was deferred to the next meeting due to committee member absences. 38 3. Waiʻōhinu Transfer Staton – Update regarding Waiʻōhinu Transfer Station site visit 39 followed by discussion and potential decision making. [SEE YOUTUBE 40 TIMESTAMP 10:59] 41 Chair Jason Masters reported that he, Committee Member Kaʻohinani Mokuhāliʻi, 42 Committee Member Gary Davis, and Planning Department staff met with Department of 43 Environmental Management Solid Waste Operations Division Chief Michael Rivera at the 44 Waiʻōhinu Transfer Station on August 11, 2025. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss 45 the potential for expanding the transfer station’s hours and days of operation, following a 46 petition submitted by Committee Member Gary Davis. The committee proposed opening 47 the transfer station on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays to better 48 accommodate the community, with weekday hours slightly adjusted. Mr. Rivera indicated 49 that the county was willing to consider adding a fourth day once additional staff could be 50 hired, noting that current operations were under capacity in terms of truck loads. Chair 51 Masters added that the committee would take this step by step, emphasizing that staffing 52 must first be secured at Waiʻōhinu before further adjustments could be considered. He also 53 noted that, in the future, other transfer stations in the district, including Ocean View and 54 Pahala, could be evaluated for similar adjustments based on community needs. The 55 committee agreed that the proposed schedule appeared to be the most practical option 56 and expressed support for moving forward. It was determined that Chair Masters would 57 notify the county to confirm the proposed schedule, unless any community members 58 raised objections or suggested alternative days. 59 4. Edmund C. Olson Trust No. 2 Highway Project Concept – Discussion and 60 potential feedback regarding a draft concept of a fuel station, coffee shop and small 61 convenience store along Highway 11, Pahala (TMK: 9-6-012:012). *Note: This is a 62 project concept. No plans or land use applications have been submitted. [SEE 63 YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 24:37] 64 Carl Okuyama provided testimony in strong support for the proposed project. He shared 65 that his company, ʻOhana Foods Inc. is interested in partnering with the Edmond Olson 66 Trust to develop a feasible plan that serves community needs and allows for future growth. 67 During discussion, Carl explained that the current plans are conceptual and that 68 community feedback will guide the final design, noting that a smaller initial build-out may 69 be more realistic. He also addressed questions about staffing, business overlap, and 70 construction sequencing, assuring members that the project aims to complement existing 71 businesses, expand local options, and open all components together once complete. [SEE 72 YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 25:45] 73 Joe Lovan provided testimony on behalf of Maui Oil and Big Island Energy, offering 74 technical insight on fuel storage, safety, and compliance. With over 45 years of experience 75 KAʻŪ CDP ACTION COMMITTEE Minutes of July 22, 2025 3 in the petroleum industry, he explained that while underground storage tanks are 76 commonly used and highly safe, above-ground tanks offer the advantage of easier 77 inspection and faster detection of potential issues. Lovan noted that the final tank size 78 would depend on data collected by ʻOhana Foods and the Olson Trust. He also addressed 79 the proposed hydrogen component, explaining that while it could be designed for future 80 use, hydrogen infrastructure remains costly, technically distinct from gas systems, and not 81 currently feasible on Hawaiʻi Island. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 33:36] 82 Cheryl Baldondo provided testimony supporting the proposed gas station and hot kitchen 83 in Pāhala, emphasizing their benefits for locals, kūpuna, tourists, and farmers. She noted 84 the importance of accessibility during emergencies and highlighted that a hot kitchen 85 would serve as a communal gathering space for the community. [SEE YOUTUBE 86 TIMESTAMP 38:06] 87 Moses Espinola provided testimony expressing support for the project, emphasizing the 88 need for a gas station that offers propane and diesel. They highlighted the importance of 89 having local fuel access for safety and emergency preparedness, noting recent road 90 disruptions. They conveyed strong backing for the project, seeing it as a valuable 91 community resource and blessing. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 39:18] 92 Mahina Lorenzo provided testimony in support of the project. [SEE YOUTUBE 93 TIMESTAMP 40:30] 94 Brenda Iokepa-Moses introduced herself as a longtime community member currently 95 working with the Olson Trust, with prior experience in the area including coffee milling. She 96 emphasized the importance of involving the community, especially kūpuna, in the planning 97 process to gather input and address concerns early. Brenda highlighted her availability for 98 individual meetings and consultations to ensure community needs are considered, noting 99 the value of public restrooms, convenient fuel, and food services along the highway. She 100 also expressed confidence in Carl’s experience and stewardship, and encouraged 101 attendees to reach out to her directly with questions or feedback. [SEE YOUTUBE 102 TIMESTAMP 40:57] 103 John Cross presented the proposal for a Pāhala convenience store, coffee shop, and fuel 104 station, emphasizing community input and support. He outlined the location on Olson Trust 105 land, the transition to a new trustee, and the Trust’s commitment to community 106 engagement. The project would include fuel (gasoline, diesel, hydrogen, propane container 107 exchange), EV stations, restrooms, a coffee shop, and a convenience store, while 108 preserving the monkey pod trees and incorporating local history and cultural elements. He 109 noted necessary infrastructure improvements, including a turning lane, 110 deceleration/acceleration lanes, parking for 33 vehicles plus larger trucks, and water line 111 extensions. 112 During the discussion, Mr. Cross addressed questions about zoning changes (from County 113 Ag 20 to medium-density urban/commercial), water access and permits, project financing, 114 and ensuring the new facility would complement rather than compete with existing 115 businesses like Mizuno Superette. Community members raised concerns about 116 environmental impacts, project oversight, and the Trust’s management structure, which Mr. 117 KAʻŪ CDP ACTION COMMITTEE Minutes of July 22, 2025 4 Cross clarified includes two trustees and a board of advisors. He also explained that the 118 project would enhance local safety, provide jobs, and create a community gathering space. 119 Brenda Iokepa-Moses’s role as community liaison and facilitator of public input was 120 highlighted. Overall, the presentation focused on project benefits, historical and cultural 121 integration, and collaboration with the community to refine and implement the proposal. 122 [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 44:26] 123 The Action Committee discussed Mr. Cross’s proposed Pāhala development, focusing on 124 zoning, traffic, and community impact. The committee noted that the General Plan must be 125 adopted before CDP amendments, and Mr. Cross explained the need to rezone 8–10 126 acres from low-density urban/agriculture to medium-density urban/Village Commercial. 127 Members asked about traffic, driveway location, and current land use, with safety and 128 maintaining plantation-style architecture emphasized. Community feedback favors locating 129 the project outside the village to reduce noise and traffic near schools. Carl noted the 130 highway location is needed to ensure sufficient fuel sales (≈75,000 gallons/year). Overall, 131 the discussion addressed procedural, logistical, and community concerns, with further 132 input expected before formal recommendations. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:09:45] 133 The Action Committee requested that Mr. Cross provide a detailed justification addressing 134 the Kaʻū CDP objectives and land use policies, since the proposed gas station location 135 conflicts with the CDP’s guidance to keep development within the village core. Mr. Cross 136 agreed to review the CDP objectives starting on page 37 and prepare a rationale for 137 modifying them in relation to the specific TMK. Committee members emphasized that while 138 Pāhala urgently needs a gas station, placing it outside the village could impact local 139 businesses by drawing traffic away from the town center. Community support and clear 140 articulation of why the proposed location is preferred over the CDP’s intended village-141 centered development are essential for the AC to consider supporting the project. 142 Concerns about traffic, safety for children, and preserving village vitality were highlighted, 143 and several members noted the importance of reflecting the broader community’s 144 preference in the justification. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:24:57] 145 Earl Louis provided testimony strongly supporting a gas station in Pāhala, citing local 146 convenience, reduced traffic to Nāʻālehu, and benefits for the growing community. He 147 emphasized voicing support for those who don’t speak publicly and improving 148 infrastructure, framing the project as essential for residents and visitors. [SEE YOUTUBE 149 TIMESTAMP 1:30:24] 150 Action Committee members discussed additional community benefits for the proposed gas 151 station, including ethanol-free fuel and electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. Mr. Cross 152 confirmed that ethanol-free gas would be included, calling it “a must,” and noted that two 153 EV charging stations are planned at the nearby Kaʻū Coffee Mill, outside the immediate 154 development, leveraging existing power infrastructure. Members also raised that the site is 155 about a mile from central Pāhala (Pikake Street and Kamani Street intersection), which 156 could impact pedestrian access if Mizuno’s were unavailable. Mr. Cross did not provide a 157 precise distance but acknowledged the concern. No further questions or motions were 158 raised at that time. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:36:59] 159 PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON MATTERS NOT ON AGENDA: [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 160 1:42:22] 161 KAʻŪ CDP ACTION COMMITTEE Minutes of July 22, 2025 5 There was no public testimony at this time. 162 THIRD-PARTY REPORTS; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS: [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 163 1:43:07] 164 There were no third-party reports from government officials. 165 PROPOSED NEW BUSINESS: [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:43:20] 166 1. Action Committee Chair and Vice Chair Elections 167 2. Hīlea Property Permitted Interaction Group Report 168 3. Pōhue Bay 169 A community member proposed a new agenda item regarding unpermitted grading and 170 excavation on a large parcel along Kamaʻoa Road in South Point (TMK 9400-4003-0000). 171 They noted the activity involves bulldozing and excavation without the required permits for 172 projects over one acre. The Action Committee agreed to place the item on the next agenda 173 and have planning staff investigate the proposed work. It was clarified that the property is 174 owned by Bishop Estate. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:49:05] 175 ANNOUNCEMENTS: 176 • Nāʻālehu Post Office Safe Pedestrian Crossing Update: The Department of 177 Transportation is in the process of securing funds to install a Speed Feedback Sign 178 to assist in slowing motorists and addressing pedestrian safety and speeding 179 concerns. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:51:28] 180 ADJOURNMENT 181 Chair Masters adjourned this meeting at 6:58 p.m. 182 These minutes and all related documents are available in the Planning Department’s Kaʻū 183 Community Development Plan Action Committee folder via the County of Hawaiʻi Public 184 Documents Repository. These documents may also be requested from the Planning 185 Department by calling (808) 961-8288 or emailing cdp@hawaiicounty.gov. 186 Edmund C. Olson Trust No. 2 We envision Hawaiʻi, where the land and people thrive together. olsontrust.com | P.O. Box 446 27-256 | Old Māmalahoa Hwy | Pāpaʻikou, Hawaiʻi 96781 November 12, 2025 To: Jason Masters, Ka’u CDP Action Committee, Chairman Members of the Ka’u CDP Action Committee From: John C. Cross, Sr. Land Manager, Edmund C. Olson Trust No.2 Brenda Iokepa-Moses, Community & Government Liaison, ECOT2 Dear Jason and Members of the Ka’u CDP Action Committee, This letter was developed to answer those questions that were raised at our last action plan committee meeting held in Pahala. Basically, asking how the Trust’s development plan for the Pahala Center on Highway 11, meets with the recommendations within the CDP document. Further, identifying those Objectives or Policy Controls where the Trust is asking variance from. Overview of the Trust’s planned development at the parcel: The Trust is proposing to develop a CoVee Shop, Convenience Store, Fuel Station , and will include public restrooms along Highway 11 just North of the Kamani Street entrance to Pahala at TMK 9-6-012-012. The development will require a modification of the General Plan LUPAG to Medium Density Urban (mdu)designation and then a re-zoning of a portion of this parcel to Village Commercial (CV-10). The area would connect to the existing (mdu) just south of Pa’au’au Stream. The LUPAG and CV-10 would not be a pocket or node, it would be a contiguous strip along H-11 to Kamani Street. The current State Land Use for the entire parcel is URBAN. This designation has been in place for many decades and was designed as being the expansion area for the Pahala town settlement. The General Plan LUPAG for the parcel is currently low density urban (ldu) which would allow for residential lots. The Trust purchased the property knowing these entitlements were in place and have not released or retracted these land use designations Communication No. 2025-11 since it acquired the property. The CDP’s recommendation that this area be re-designated as Important Agricultural lands and the proposed CDP LUPAG removing the (ldu) designation was not shared with the Trust. The CDP recommendations cannot usurp the State Land Use designation. The Trust was never consulted or noticed of these proposed changes. If eVected, these changes could constitute a violation of HRS 205 to redistrict a parcel without our consent. Imposition of the district changes would also violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and Hawaii State Constitution’s takings and damages clauses. Lets not go in that direction, but work together with the community for a project that many in Pahala and the district of Ka’u sincerely want to happen. Alignment with the CDP Section 3 Preferred Conservation and Settlement Patterns Section 3.1 Preferred Settlement Pattern Maximizing the use of existing and planned infrastructure: The project will encompass approximately 3 acres of land. There are no existing commercial zoned areas within the Pahala town settlement area that meet that area size. The proposed parcel for Olson’s Pahala Center meets the “planned infrastructure” recited, placing the development in lands that were previously designated for Urban type land uses. Preserving viable agricultural lands, open spaces, and viewscapes: The project will use lands that are currently designated as ALISH 3 (poor) and Land Study Bureau “Undesignated”,as the lands are SLU Urban and not designated for Ag ranking. That being said , the surrounding lands are ranked as “C” and “D”. LSB rankings are from A to E with A being Prime and E being Poor. C and D rankings could be designated as being “fair to poor”. The project will retain the agricultural uses surrounding the development area with irrigated coVee plantings and Monkey Pod trees. Agricultural use of the parcel requires irrigation, as the natural rainfall in this region cannot support successful crop production. Viewscapes of the mountain slopes above Pahala town are envisioned to be enhanced at the project site with interpretive signage of the Pu’u names and ahupua’as above the center. Preserving historic sites and buildings and encouraging the construction of new buildings in character with Ka’u’s architectural distinctiveness and rural sense of place: The project will be designed to keep it open with Plantation style architecture and landscaping. Colors will be natural tones matching those of plantation houses and buildings in Pahala. Interior work will be wood panels and floors. Wall space will be designated for historic maps and educational panels on the history of the Ka’u district and Pahala town. Native Hawaiian land use as well as the modern transformation uses for Ranching, Sugarcane, and Macadamia Nut production will be highlighted. Many of the large majestic Monkey Pod trees will be preserved to provide a link to the rest of the parcel. If any tree(s) needing to be removed the wood from those trees will be utilized within the buildings as bench or shelf tops honoring the beauty of the wood and the gift of the tree. Section 3.2 General Plan Alignment The existing low density designation aligns with it being an urban center. The proposed change to medium density is not aligned with the proposed LUPAG within the CDP document. The Trust respectfully asks that the CDP Action Committee concur that a change is needed and recommended based on the comments from the Community. The Trust has held many community meetings and the general tone from the community members who have attended and commented is they are supportive of the project and would want it to happen. Further to that, the community wants it to happen sooner than later. The CDP document on page 38 states, “The creation of new urban and rural centers should be initiated only when it is in the public interest and must be accompanied by commitments from both government and the private sector for the development of basic community and public facilities and services. Infrastructure costs less when [residential] areas are located near existing highways, water and sewer lines, and employment centers.” (bold emphasis added; bracketed [residential] could also reference “urban and commercial” areas are located near….) Section 3.3 Community Objectives Four Objectives are recited: Objective 1 “Encourage future settlement patterns that are safe, sustainable and connected…” The project will be approximately 0.6miles northeast of the Pahala/Kamani Street intersection. While it is not within the historic town center it is connected by way of Urban expansion zoning. The community can safely access the Pahala Center from H-11 and utilize the expansive parking areas planned for both residential vehicles and larger trucks, buses and trailers. The proposed change in speed limit to 35mph will allow for safer entry/exit from Kamani Street and to the Project itself. Objective 2 “Preserve prime and other viable agricultural lands and preserve and enhance viewscapes…” The project will keep irrigated coVee in production on the parcel as part of its educational experience. Additionally, landscaping will be introduced using native plants including connections to the districts’ agricultural heritage of ranching, sugarcane and macadamia nuts. As stated earlier the Pahala Center layout will try to display the mountain slopes and Pu’u above Pahala with interpretive signage as to the significance of these Pu’u and ahupua’a’s. Objective 4: “Protect, restore and enhance Ka’u’s unique cultural assets including historic sites…” The project buildings will also include historical displays of the Ka’u district and its importance to Hawaiian culture. From the arrival of the first Polynesian discoverers, to the Chiefs who ruled Ka’u, to the fierce independent nature of the Ka’u residents, the Ka’u district and community will be highlighted within the bounds of the Center. Objective 12: “Establish or expand retail, service, dining, and entertainment centers…” The community members who have attended our information gathering sessions have all welcomed hearing that our project will expand all of the above recited activities. Pahala lacks a hot food service center, our convenience store will fill that gap. Pahala lacks a fully serviced fuel station with gasoline, diesel, (on-highway and oV- highway), and EV recharging stations. Future service into alternate fuels such as Hydrogen will be explored. Propane canister exchange will also be on site. Much needed access to public restrooms will also be available. Section 3.4 Land Use Policy Policy 1: “Rehabilitate and develop within existing zoned urban areas already served by basic infrastructure…” The project is placed within already SLU designated URBAN. Infrastructure includes adjoining State DOT highway 11, the location of three phase electric powerlines, and an 8” DWS water service main on the property. Policy 2: “Concentrate commercial uses within and surrounding central core areas in Pahala, Naalehu, and Ocean View and do not allow strip or spot commercial development outside of the designated urban areas” The central core of Pahala town does not have the area required to support the designed facility we are envisioning. The project TMK is appropriately zoned State Land Use URBAN. Policy 3: “Commercial facilities shall be developed in areas adequately served by necessary services, such as water, utilities, sewers, and transportation systems….” (See answer stated in Policy 1) Further, a shuttle service may be employed to transport community members to the Project site. Waste water is yet to be designed, and could include a package STP or contained Septic system. Policy 4, 5 and 6 (as recited on page 39) Do not apply to the Project. Land Use Policy Map Policy 7: Refers to adoption of the CDP maps on pages 43 through 48… The Trust believes this Policy statement is overly broad. Further only the County Council or State Land Use Commission can make these type of land use changes. The 2025 County of Hawaii General Plan currently is before the County Council for approval. The County Council has not yet voted to accept the General Plan in its current form. The Trust would like to see a change in the mapping designations to accept the Land Use and Zoning changes needed for the Project. Policy 8: Refers to Low Density Urban (ldu) on the CDP maps only be allowed a change of zone to RS, RM , RCX, or Open… The Trust would like to have a portion of TMK 9-6-012- 012 designated as LUPAG Medium Density Urban (mdu) to allow for rezoning to Village Commercial. A favorable recommendation from the Action Plan committee is requested. Policy 9: Does not apply to the Project Land Use Permitting Policy 10: “The Planning Director shall o]er favorable recommendations to the Planning Commissions, subject to appropriate conditions, only for those proposed code amendments that would further the intent and ensure consistency with the objectives and policies of the Ka’u CDP…” The Trust believes that the Project would support several of the objectives and policies within the CDP. With broad community support, the project would allow for enhanced services to the community and to visitors. The project would not clutter the core town center. The enhanced fuel services, convenience store with hot food, and CoVee Shop visitor center would be on Highway 11 only a short distance away from the Kamani street intersection. A favorable recommendation from the Action Plan committee to the Planning Director to allow for the required GP and zoning changes is requested. Policy 11: Refers to Variances… Does not apply to the Project. Policy 12: “Outstanding natural or cultural features, such as scenic spots, water courses, fine groves of trees, heiau’s, and historical sites shall be preserved during [subdivision]. Although not a ‘subdivision’, the Project will preserve and enhance the features upon the land that has become a landmark of Pahala. The large Monkey Pod trees scattered through the project area will be preserved to keep the scenic view intact. A walkway is planned for the project area to allow visitors to meander through the trees, view the mountain slopes, the Pu’u’s above Pahala, and learn cultural aspects of the Ka’u district through the planned Hawaiian “canoe plant” garden. Policy 13: Refers to waivers to zoning and subdivision chapters regarding Consolidation and Resubdivsion (PC&R)actions…This does not apply to the Project Policy 14: Refers to Plan Approval and related conditions…The Pahala project will likely require Plan Approval after rezoning is appropriated. The Project will gladly consider conditions of Plan Approval to enhance viewscapes, areas of natural beauty, proper landscaping, and provide for historic and cultural education experiences in the Projects’ buildings and grounds. Section 3.5 County Action Policy 15: “Amend the General Plan LUPAG and as needed, State Land use boundaries, to conform with the o]icial Ka’u CDP Land use Policy Map” The Trust respectfully requests that the Ka’u CDP Action Plan Committee recommend that the General Plan LUPAG maps within the CDP be amended to reflect appropriate LUPAG designation (Medium Density Urban,(mdu))for a band width across the Highway 11 frontage of TMK 9-6- 012-012 from the existing (mdu) area at Kamani Street near the Ka’u Hospital. Further we ask that the Action Plan Committee recommend to the Planning Director and County Council to consider approving requested Change of Zone from Ag-20 to Village Commercial 10. The CV10 zoning at TMK 9-6-012-012 will connect to the existing CV-10 zoning at Kamani Street near the Ka’u Hospital. Sincerely, John C. Cross Sr. Land Manager Edmund C. Olson Trust No. 2 Brenda Iokepa-Moses Community & Government Liaison Edmund C. Olson Trust No. 2 Communication No. 2025-12 Communication No. 2025-13 Communication No. 2025-14 1 My thoughts on the proposed development on Highway 11 in Pahala. Babette Morrow The Action Committee members recently received a memo from John Cross and Brenda Iopepa-Moses explaining who their proposal meets the recommendations found in the Ka’ū CDP. I appreciate them providing this in advance of our Action Committee meeting. As Action Committee members, our responsibility is not to decide whether or not we like a project, but to evaluate whether or not a project complies with the goals and policies of the CDP and to make recommendations to the Planning Director and/or the Planning Commission. The Ka’ū CDP was developed over ten years of many many public meetings with the community, and we value the final adopted plan. In materials that I received when I first joined the Action Committee in 2022, it states : “The overarching role of an Action Committee is to be a proactive, community-based steward for the implementation of their respective CDP. The Action Committee will provide ongoing feedback, advocacy, and action to advance implementation of the CDP goals and objectives and acts in an advisory capacity to the Planning Director.” Input from the community regarding a proposed project is invaluable and must be taken into consideration in everything that we do, but we can’t forget our role as an Action Committee member. Land Use Map This area is currently designated as Important Agricultural Land and includes those identified in the ALISH classification system as prime or unique and in the Land Study Bureau’s soil study as Class B “good” soils. The development area is currently surrounded by a coffee farm and monkey pod trees. According to the applicant, the land is designated as ALISH poor and Land Study Bureau undesignated. In the definition section, there is this - - The location of Important Agricultural Lands should be verified by more detailed mapping when considering specific land use decisions. Comment: I would like to see this clarified. Preferred Settlement Patterns 3.3 Community Objectives. Objective 1: concentrate new commercial development in compact, walkable, mixed-use town/village centers. Comment: This proposed development is not located in the town center. It is on the highway, almost a mile from the existing town center, and is not safely walkable for potential local customers such as school children and kupuna. People walking from Pahala to the project would have to walk along the highway from Kamani Street. Communication No. 2025-15 2 Objective 2: Preserve prime and other viable agricultural lands. Comment: It appears that the surrounding land is viable for agricultural uses since coffee trees are currently being grown and cattle are being grazed. Will the development be limited to the current proposal of three acres? Objective 4: Protect, restore, and enhance Ka’ū’s unique cultural assets, including archeological and historic sites and historic buildings. Comment: Apparently there are no identified cultural assets on the site. Objective 12: Establish or expand retail, service, dining, and entertainment centers in rural villages and towns capable of supporting Ka’ū-appropriate growth. Comment: This development will expand services in an area currently lacking sufficient service, however it is not located in the town that it is supposed to serve. Land Use Policy Policy 1. Rehabilitate and develop within existing zoned urban areas already served by basic infrastructure, or close to such areas, instead of scattered development. Comment: The applicant has shown the State Land Use zoning but not current County zoning. Is it zoned urban? Is the existing 8” water main sufficient for this development? How will wastewater be handled? Policy 2. Concentrate commercial uses within and surrounding central core areas in Pāhala and do not allow strip or spot commercial development outside of the designated urban areas. Comment: The Land Use Policy Map for Pāhala shows that this development is adjacent to Low Density Urban. The Medium Density Urban sites are located in the current town core at the intersection of Kamani Street and Pikake Street, and at the area around Maile Street and Pikake Street. Changing the zoning at the project site would be considered spot zoning. Policy 3. Commercial facilities shall be developed in areas adequately served by necessary services, such as water, utilities, sewers, and transportation systems. Comment: discussed in Policy 1. Policy 4 is not applicable as it references industrial development. Policy 5 Is not applicable as it references resort areas. Policy 6 is not applicable as it references visitor accommodations. Policy 7 Future land use decisions shall be consistent with the land use policy map boundaries, designations, and policies herein (see figure 3, the land use policy map for Pāhala), unless the CDP and the General Plan are in direct conflict. Comment: The 3 proposed project would require a change in zoning from what is shown on the land use policy map. Policy 8 In the Low Density Urban (LDU) land use policy map category, changes of zone shall only be permitted to Single-family residential, Multiple-family residential, Residential, Residential-Commercial mixed use, or Open. Comment: The proposed change of zoning to Village Commercial would not comply with this policy. Policy 9 refers to infill capacity in areas designated Low Density Urban and therefore is not applicable. Policy 10 addresses recommendations from the Director of Planning to the Planning Commission for proposed zoning code amendments that would further the intent and ensure consistency with the objectives and policies of the Ka’ū CDP. Comment: the Action Committee would need to vote on recommendations that we are sending to the Director of Planning. Policy 11 addresses variances from the zoning or subdivision codes and is not applicable. Policy 12 addresses natural or cultural features to be preserved during subdivision. Comment: Any natural or cultural features should be addressed during the review of development plans, which comes later. Policy 13 addresses waivers to zoning and subdivision codes and is not applicable. Policy 14 discusses items to be considered during plan review and is not applicable. County Action Policy 15 and Policy 16 recommend that the General Plan land use maps be amended, if necessary, to conform with CDP land use policy map and to amend the General Plan table to reflect map amendments. Comment: Does the current proposed General Plan conform with the Ka’ū CDP land use policy map? Kaʻū Community Development Plan Action Committee Land Use Orientation November 2025 Communication No. 2025-16 Hawaii Land Use 101 •All private land use is regulated by state and county authorities, with federal land exempt. •State land use classifications: Urban, Rural, Agricultural, and Conservation. •County Land Use System: General Plan, Community Development Plans, County Zoning, Special Management Area, and the Administrative Permit Process (including subdivision, plan approval, variances, etc). Hawai‘i County General Plan •Policy document for the long-range comprehensive development of the County. •PURPOSE: Identify long-range visions, values and priorities Guide the pattern of future development Guide the County’s decision-making Establishes priorities for public investments Promote and safeguard the public interest CDP Authority & Purpose •Translate the broad General Plan statements to specific actions at a regional level; •Forum for community input into managing growth and coordinating the delivery of government services to the community; •Creates a long-range framework to guide future decision making and actions; •Direct physical development and public improvements within a specific area •Focus on action GP's Relationship to CDPs CDPs •District-Specific •Translate General Plan into action at the regional level •Designed to empower grassroots initiatives alongside government action. •County-wide •Broad plans and direction •Calls for implementation through CDPs General Plan Mutually dependent Hawaii County Land Use Approval Process KEY STEPS: 1. Application Submission: Initial filing with the Planning Department. 2. Planning Department Review: Ensures compliance with zoning and regulations. 3. Planning Commission:Reviews projects requiring discretionary permits. 4. County Council: Approves major zoning changes and land use amendments. 5. Final Approval & Permits: Issued by the Planning Department and Department of Public Works (DPW). 6. Board of Appeals (If Denied):Applicants may appeal rejected applications by Planning or DPW. Hawaii County Land Use Approval Process KEY STEPS: 1. Application Submission: Initial filing with the Planning Department. 2. Planning Department Review: Ensures compliance with zoning and regulations. 3. Planning Commission:Reviews projects requiring discretionary permits. 4. County Council: Approves major zoning changes and land use amendments. 5. Final Approval & Permits: Issued by the Planning Department and Department of Public Works (DPW). 6. Board of Appeals (If Denied):Applicants may appeal rejected applications by Planning or DPW. Kaʻū Community Development Plan The Kaʻū CDP should honor Kaʻū’s unique rural lifestyle, its connection between people and place, and its distinctive Hawaiian cultural heritage. It must plan for the future in ways that: •Increase economic opportunities through a diverse, resilient, and sustainable economy. •Protect and provide reasonable access to natural and recreational resources, including the mauka forests, the coastline, open spaces, and park facilities and programs. •Strengthen families, communities, and the diversity of local cultures. Kaʻū CDP Vision Statement: Navigating the CDP Section 1 & 2:Introduction &Applicability Section 3:Advance preferred Conservation and Settlement Patters Section 4:Protect and Enhance Natural and Cultural Resources Section 5:Strengthen Infrastructure,Facilities, and Services Section 6: Build a Resilient,Sustainable Local Economy Section 7:Pursue Potential Synergistic Projects Appendix 8A: Community- Based,Collaborative Action Guide Appendix 8 is designed to support the community-led CDP implementation process Purpose of the CDP Action Committee •Be a proactive, community-based steward of the implementation and updating of the CDP. (HCC 16-4(a)) How do advisory boards differ from other boards? An advisory board is a body that provides non-binding advice to the management of a corporation, organization, or foundation. CDP Action committees are advisory to the Planning Director. Action committees are not decision-making bodies. They do not have the authority to approve or deny permits. Examples of County decision-making bodies are: Windward & Leeward Planning Commissions Board of Appeals Police & Fire Commissions Water Board Duties & Responsibilities •Provide ongoing input and advocacy to advance implementation of the CDP goals, objectives, policies, and actions. (HCC 16-6(1)) Waiʻōhinu Transfer Station Section 3: Advance Preferred Conservation and Settlement Patterns Potential Community Lead: Action Committee •3.4 Land Use Policy o Policy 3Commercial facilities shall be developed in areas adequately served by necessary services such as water, utilities, and transportation systems. Should such services not be available, the development of more intensive uses should be in concert with a localized program of public and private capital improvements to meet the expected increased needs. (GP 14.3.3(b))