HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-04-14 KCDP Minutes Draft
KONA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1
ACTION COMMITTEE 2
COUNTY OF HAWAIʻI 3
DRAFT MINUTES 4
April 14, 2026 5
Call to Order 6
Chair John Pelletier called the meeting of the Kona Community Development Plan (CDP) 7
Action Committee (AC) to order at 12:04 p.m. The meeting was held in person at the West 8
Hawaiʻi Civic Center – Building G, and online via the Zoom platform. 9
The full YouTube video of this meeting can be found here: 10
https://youtu.be/I1joldTwVR4?si=FOgnZ_Z8tyXfv4Yf 11
Roll Call 12
Members Present (in person): 13
• John Pelletier, Chair 14
• Nancy Pisicchio, Vice Chair 15
• Charla Thompson 16
• Charles Young 17
Members Present (via Zoom): Shane Palacat-Nelsen 18
Members Absent: Raymond “RJ” Kirchner and Roselyn Molina 19
Planning Department Staff Present (in person): 20
• Janice Hata 21
• Maryam Palma 22
• Jessica Lahip 23
• Kawelo Kalili 24
There were approximately 19 members of the public in attendance (four in person and 15 25
via Zoom). 26
Approval of Minutes 27
Chair Pelletier requested approval of the March 10, 2026 draft meeting minutes at 28
approximately 12:07 p.m. Vice Chair Pisicchio moved to approve the minutes, and 29
Committee Member Thompson seconded the motion. There being no discussion or 30
corrections, the Committee voted unanimously to approve the March 10, 2026 draft 31
meeting minutes. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 03:06] 32
KONA CDP ACTION COMMITTEE
Minutes of April 14, 2026
2
Public Testimony on Agenda Items 33
Chair Pelletier called for public testimony on agenda items at approximately 12:08 p.m. 34
Testimony was received primarily regarding Hawaiʻi County Council Bill 66, Draft 2, the 35
Draft General Plan 2045, and the proposed General Plan 2026. 36
Michelle Melendez testified in opposition to General Plan 2045 and in support of the 2026 37
proposal. She stated that the 2045 draft is too lengthy, vague, and difficult for the County 38
to implement, and expressed concern that its language would allow outside organizations 39
and stakeholders to influence Hawaiʻi Island planning. She also raised concerns about 40
climate change-related policy language and asked the Committee to support the 2026 41
proposal, while noting that maps are needed. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 04:42] 42
Donna Thompson testified in support of the 2026 proposal and raised concerns about 43
General Plan 2045, including alleged links to outside templates, sustainability initiatives, 44
privacy rights, rezoning, and implementation complexity. She stated that the general plan 45
should be streamlined, simpler to understand, and made available for broader public 46
review, including maps. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 09:36] 47
Sarahlee Kittons testified against General Plan 2045 and in support of the 2026 proposal. 48
She stated that the 2045 draft includes vague policies that could allow outside 49
stakeholders to influence land use decisions and expressed concern about data systems, 50
resource management, and community control. She urged more local involvement in 51
planning. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 14:13] 52
Kevin Hill testified against General Plan 2045 and in support of the 2026 proposal, with 53
reservations. He stated that any new plan should still go through public review, the 54
Planning Commission, and County Council. He also expressed concern that Hilo has not 55
had an updated Community Development Plan and that public testimony during earlier 56
stages of the General Plan process had not been adequately incorporated. [SEE 57
YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 17:38] 58
Janice Palma-Glennie testified in support of continuing work on General Plan 2045 rather 59
than replacing it with the 2026 proposal. She stated that community-based land use 60
planning, CDPs, maps, zoning guidance, and implementation provisions are important 61
tools for protecting natural and cultural resources, reducing sprawl, and supporting future 62
planning. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 23:16] 63
Juhl Rayne testified in support of the 2026 proposal and against General Plan 2045. She 64
expressed concern that the 2045 draft could affect property rights and described the 65
document as too long and influenced by outside agendas. She stated that the 2026 66
proposal is not perfect but is preferable. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 26:27] 67
Lily Booth testified about concerns related to land clearing, development, public 68
awareness, and access in South Kona. She stated that local families need more 69
information and education about land use planning and the General Plan process, and 70
KONA CDP ACTION COMMITTEE
Minutes of April 14, 2026
3
that meeting times can make participation difficult for working residents. [SEE YOUTUBE 71
TIMESTAMP 30:20] 72
Millicent Cummings testified in opposition to General Plan 2045 while expressing 73
concerns about voting on the 2026 proposal without associated maps and without a 74
complete public process. She raised concerns about procedure, Sunshine Law 75
compliance, Hilo’s lack of an updated CDP, Hawaiian Home Lands, and public trust 76
resources. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 34:30] 77
Melvin Mason Jr. testified regarding Bill 66, Draft 2, and the proposed draft General Plan 78
2026. He urged the Committee to ground its decision in kuleana and stated that the 79
General Plan guides land use, infrastructure, economic development, and protection of 80
cultural and natural resources. He expressed concern that replacing General Plan 2045 81
with a substantial rewrite could undermine public process, Native Hawaiian rights, 82
consultation, and the County’s ability to influence decisions affecting federal lands [SEE 83
YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 41:31] 84
Josephine Keliʻipio testified against General Plan 2045 and stated that she had changed 85
her earlier position after reviewing concerns about the plan’s climate change-related 86
content. She urged rejection of the 2045 draft. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 47:32] 87
Third-Party Reports; Government Officials 88
Pursuant to Hawaiʻi Senate Bill 405 (2025), signed into law as Act 72, the AC may receive 89
and discuss information from third-party reports by any government official not included 90
in the publicly noticed agenda, but may not make decisions on matters raised through 91
such reports until a later meeting with proper notice. No third-party reports were 92
presented. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 51:40] 93
Business 94
Chair Pelletier reordered the agenda to take up Business Item 2, regarding Hawaiʻi County 95
Council Bill 66 (Draft 2), as the first item of business. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 13:20] 96
1. Hawaiʻi County Council Bill 66 (Draft 2): The AC will discuss Bill 66 (Draft 2), 97
including its potential implications for the Kona CDP and any relevant developments 98
arising from the April 7, 2026 meeting of the County Council Policy Committee on 99
Planning, Land Use, and Economic Development. The AC will consider submitting 100
testimony to the Council on this matter. Supporting materials are included in the 101
meeting packet: 102
• Communication No. 2026-05 Testimony of Planning Director Jeffrey Darrow – Bill 103
66, Draft 2 104
• Communication No. 2026-06 Documents and Supporting Information – Bill 66, 105
Draft 2 106
KONA CDP ACTION COMMITTEE
Minutes of April 14, 2026
4
This item was called to order at approximately 12:56 p.m. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 107
51:45] 108
Chair Pelletier summarized the status of Draft General Plan 2045, which was before 109
Council as Bill 66, Draft 2, and described Council Member Ashley Kierkiewicz’s 110
proposed substitute document, referred to during the meeting as the “General Plan 111
2026” proposal. He noted that the 2026 proposal was introduced as an amendment to 112
General Plan 2045, that Corporation Counsel had discussed whether such a 113
substantial change could proceed, and that additional public, state, and federal 114
consultation would likely be required if the proposed substitute moved forward. Chair 115
Pelletier also noted that the 2026 proposal did not yet include maps, while land use 116
maps are a required component of the General Plan. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 117
52:54] 118
Vice Chair Pisicchio stated that the proposed 2026 document was concerning 119
because, if adopted as a substitute amendment, it would replace the 2045 draft rather 120
than remain as a separate option for further work. She stated that the 2026 proposal 121
is too stripped down, removes important planning and implementation material, and 122
reduces opportunities for community participation. She cited the implementation 123
chapter of the 2005 General Plan as an example of language that helped establish the 124
CDP program. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 56:25] 125
Committee Member Young stated that it was concerning for a substantially different 126
proposal to be introduced late in the process. He said that, although he did not agree 127
with every part of the General Plan 2045 process, he did not believe the existing draft 128
should be dismissed. He also emphasized that the world and planning issues are more 129
complex than they were decades ago, and that the County needs to recognize 130
changing environmental conditions, including impacts to reefs and ocean resources. 131
[SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:02:03] 132
Committee Member Palacat-Nelsen commented on outside influences, aloha ʻāina, the 133
need to uphold public process, and the importance of scrutinizing planning 134
amendments while recognizing the long history of outside influence in Hawaiʻi. [SEE 135
YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:05:49] 136
Vice Chair Pisicchio moved that the Kona CDP Action Committee recommend that the 137
Council not support the substitution requested through Communication 372.192 and 138
instead work collaboratively to make further improvements to and adopt Bill 66, Draft 139
2, the 2045 General Plan. The motion stated that Bill 66, Draft 2, includes visions, 140
objectives, policies, actions, and implementation provisions compatible with the Kona 141
CDP and that the proposed substitute does not qualify as an amendment but 142
constitutes a complete rewrite and new general plan. Committee Member Young 143
seconded the motion. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:08:22] 144
KONA CDP ACTION COMMITTEE
Minutes of April 14, 2026
5
Chair Pelletier stated that neither plan is exactly what the County needs, but that 145
continuing to work from the 2045 draft would provide a better path than starting over 146
with a proposal written by one council member and not yet supported by the same 147
level of community or Planning Department collaboration. Vice Chair Pisicchio further 148
noted that General Plan 2045 includes a section supporting the County planning 149
system and the CDP program, while the proposed 2026 substitute eliminates much of 150
that material. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:13:13] 151
The Committee voted unanimously to submit the testimony to Council, with Chair 152
Pelletier to present or submit the testimony as appropriate. [SEE YOUTUBE 153
TIMESTAMP 01:16:41] 154
This item concluded at approximately 1:17 p.m. 155
Quorum was lost at approximately 1:17 p.m. when Committee Member Palacat-Nelsen 156
left the meeting. The Committee continued with discussion only and took no further 157
action. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:17:14] 158
2. Tree City USA Designation: Committee Member Charla Thompson will provide an 159
update on the County’s designation as a Tree City USA community. Discussion on next 160
steps and potential action to follow. 161
This item was called to order at approximately 1:22 p.m. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 162
01:18:32] 163
Chair Pelletier called for public testimony on this item. No public testimony was 164
provided. 165
Committee Member Thompson reported that the County had officially received the 166
Tree City USA designation and that she had begun reviewing suggested next steps. 167
She described possible future work, including forming a committee or nonprofit effort, 168
identifying a steering committee, coordinating with arborists and County departments, 169
planting appropriate trees in parks and along public roadways, increasing shade in 170
parking lots and walking areas, supporting arboretums and educational projects, and 171
exploring grants and maintenance funding. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:18:59] 172
Vice Chair Pisicchio thanked Committee Member Thompson for her work and 173
suggested that the AC invite people with direct experience in Tree City USA 174
implementation to provide a public presentation. She suggested that County staff and 175
community members with arborist experience, including Kevin Sullivan, may be able 176
to help explain what the designation requires and what opportunities it creates. 177
Committee Member Young noted that funding, potential ordinance changes, and 178
possible capital improvement needs may need to be considered once the program 179
requirements are better understood. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:22:06] 180
KONA CDP ACTION COMMITTEE
Minutes of April 14, 2026
6
Discussion also addressed the importance of tree species selection, cultural and 181
traditional practices, use of trees for food and lāʻau lapaʻau, maintenance of existing 182
trees, tree safety, shade, walkability, and coordination with other organizations. 183
Committee Member Thompson stated that she would begin identifying presenters and 184
next steps for a future discussion. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:27:55] 185
This item concluded at approximately 1:41 p.m. 186
Public Testimony on Matters Not on the Agenda 187
Pursuant to Hawaiʻi Senate Bill 869 (2025), signed into law as Act 53, testimony on matters 188
not on the agenda may be limited to three minutes per speaker. Chair Pelletier called for 189
testimony at approximately 1:46 p.m. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:42:07] 190
Janice Palma-Glennie provided testimony regarding the General Plan process. She stated 191
that she agreed with some concerns raised by testifiers about process and public 192
outreach, while also believing that planners had tried to engage the public. She stated 193
that some meetings felt too top-down and urged broader outreach and improved meeting 194
formats to help rebuild trust and incorporate public concerns through the General Plan 195
2045 process. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:42:42] 196
Proposed New Business 197
This item was called to order at approximately 1:49 p.m. Committee members discussed 198
placing the General Plan on the next agenda for a report on Council action, continuing 199
discussion of the Tree City USA designation and next steps, and exploring whether 200
Committee Member Young would have a water-related update. Committee members also 201
discussed coordinating Tree City USA information with the other CDP Action Committees. 202
[SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:45:13] 203
Announcements 204
Chair Pelletier provided an update on Senate Bill 2372, Relating to Trees. He stated that 205
the AC had submitted testimony, that the bill had passed House committees with minor 206
amendments, and that the Committee’s testimony had been referenced in committee 207
reports. He reported that the bill had passed third reading in the House and would next 208
move through the remaining legislative process. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:48:48] 209
Chair Pelletier also announced Hawaiʻi County Council Bill 147, relating to short-term 210
vacation rentals. He explained that the bill would redefine hosted and unhosted short-term 211
vacation rentals, identify where such uses may operate, and proceed through the Planning 212
Commissions before returning to Council. Janice Palma-Glennie commented that vacation 213
rental regulation is important to land use and community planning even though the Kona 214
CDP may not expressly mention vacation rentals. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 01:51:43] 215
KONA CDP ACTION COMMITTEE
Minutes of April 14, 2026
7
The Planning Department is seeking applicants for the Kona CDP Action Committee. 216
The application can be found on the Mayor’s office website at: 217
https://www.hawaiicounty.gov/our-county/boards-and-commissions 218
The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, May 12, 2026. 219
Adjournment 220
Chair Pelletier adjourned this meeting at 1:59 p.m. 221
These minutes and all related documents are available in the Planning Department’s Kona 222
Community Development Plan Action Committee folder via the County of Hawaiʻi Public 223
Documents Repository. These documents may also be requested from the Planning 224
Department by calling (808) 961-8288 or emailing CDP@hawaiicounty.gov. 225