Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PD Background Report (PL-SMA-2025-000085 & PL-REZ-2026-000104_Amend REZ 727)
1 B_TALON1_SMA_REZ COUNTY OF HAWAIʻI PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT TALON 1 PROPERTIES LLC SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA USE PERMIT APPLICATION (PL-SMA-2025-000085) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 92-122 (PL-REZ-2026-000104 / Amend REZ 727) TALON 1 PROPERTIES LLC has submitted the following: Application to amend Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122 to obtain additional time to satisfy outstanding time-related conditions of the ordinance. Ordinance No. 92-122 changed the zoning of the subject lands from Resort-Hotel, Safety-750 square feet (V-S-.75) to Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20). The applicant is requesting a five-year extension associated with Condition C relating to Final Plan Approval and Condition D relating to commencement and completion of construction; and Application for a Special Management Area Use Permit to allow the development of a three-story self-storage warehouse and related improvements on approximately 2.57 acres of land situated within the Special Management Area. The subject property is located at 525 Piʻilani Street, at the northeast corner of Piʻilani Street and the undeveloped portion of Mililani Street, Waiākea, South Hilo, Hawaiʻi, TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Applicant’s Request: The applicant, Talon 1 Properties LLC, is requesting approval of a Special Management Area Use Permit to construct a three-story self-storage warehouse and related site improvements on the subject property. Concurrently, the applicant is requesting an amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122 to provide additional time to comply with outstanding conditions relating to Final Plan Approval and completion of construction. 2. Proposed Development: The proposed development consists of a three-story self-storage warehouse containing approximately 93,603 square feet of enclosed floor area, consisting of approximately 31,201 square feet per floor. Two covered porte-cocheres, totaling approximately 4,920 square feet, are proposed at the 2 north and south ends of the building for sheltered customer loading and unloading. The total proposed enclosed and covered area is approximately 98,523 square feet. The conceptual floor plan provides approximately 264 individual storage units, consisting of 88 units per floor, together with restrooms and elevators. The proposed building would have a maximum height of approximately 41 feet 8 inches, below the 45-foot height limit of the ML district. The site plan provides vehicular circulation around the proposed building, parking, loading areas, landscaping, drainage improvements, and utility connections. The current plans identify approximately 28 parking stalls, including two ADA-accessible stalls, and seven 12-foot by 50-foot loading zones. The architectural design is intended to incorporate features reflective of the historic character of Hilo. Access is presently available from Piʻilani Street. The project also proposes improvement and extension of the presently undeveloped portion of Mililani Street along the western side of the property to County dedicable standards, which would provide an additional point of access to the project site. 3. Reason for the Request: The applicant proposes to develop the vacant ML-20 zoned property with a self-storage facility intended to provide storage space for residents and businesses in the Hilo area. The proposed use requires the continued effectiveness of the ML-20 zoning established under Ordinance No. 92- 122. The applicant states that the outstanding development conditions of the 1992 ordinance were not completed by previous owners of the property and requests a five-year extension to allow sufficient time to obtain required approvals and construct the proposed project. 4. Landowners: TALON 1 PROPERTIES LLC 5. Supportive Information: The applicant submitted materials in support of the requests, including the Special Management Area Use Permit application and Change of Zone time-extension justification (Planning Department Exhibit 1 – Combined SMA Use Permit and Rezone Amendment Application dated June 4, 2026), and a Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No 3 Significant Impact for the Talon 1 Properties Self-Storage Warehouse project, PL-ENV-2024-000028, was completed in August 2025 (Planning Department Exhibit 2 – Final Environmental Assessment). CHRONOLOGY OF LAND USE PERMITTING 6. March 23, 1990 – Resolution No. 151-90: The Hawaiʻi County Council adopted Resolution No. 151-90 requesting that the Planning Director conduct a feasibility study regarding redesignation of lands in the vicinity of the subject property from Medium Density Urban to Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map. The action was initiated in response to a proposal by Suisan Company, Limited, to relocate fish-processing and related storage operations to the area. 7. July 24, 1991 – General Plan Amendment Ordinance No. 91-72: Ordinance No. 91-72 became effective, changing the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide designation applicable to the subject property from Medium Density Urban to Industrial. 8. September 1, 1992 – Special Management Area Use Permit No. 334: The Planning Commission approved Special Management Area Use Permit No. 334 for development of a fish-processing facility on the subject lands. The permit was subsequently revoked and is no longer valid. 9. November 20, 1992 – Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122: Ordinance No. 92- 122 became effective, changing the zoning of TMKs 2-2-033:011, 012, 019 and 020 from Resort-Hotel, Safety-750 square feet (V-S-.75) to Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20). The ordinance included conditions requiring consolidation of the parcels, Final Plan Approval, commencement and completion of construction, roadway improvements, drainage, and compliance with applicable governmental requirements. 10. October 24, 1994 – Consolidation 831-Revised: Final approval was granted for Consolidation 831-Revised, which consolidated TMKs 2-2-033:011, 012, 019 and 020 into the present parcel identified as TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011. 11. December 6, 2018 – Prior Time Extension Request: The Windward Planning Commission considered a request by the former property owner, Piilani Partners, LLC, for an amendment to Ordinance No. 92-122 relating to Condition C (Plan 4 Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction). The proposal at that time involved development of a potable water well and commercial bottling facility. The Commission recommended approval of a five-year time extension to the County Council. However, the County Council did not approve the requested time extension. Therefore, the time requirements contained in Conditions C and D of Ordinance No. 92-122 were not extended and expired. As a result, Conditions C and D are presently stale and must be amended before development may proceed under those conditions. 12. January 16, 2022 – Special Management Area Minor Permit: Special Management Area Minor Permit PL-SMM-2022-000012 was approved for clearing of the subject property. The property was subsequently cleared of substantial invasive vegetation and accumulated debris. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 13. State Land Use District: Urban. 14. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: Industrial (ind)- These areas include uses such as manufacturing and processing, wholesaling, large storage and transportation facilities, light industrial and industrial-commercial uses. 15. County Zoning: Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20), pursuant to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122. 16. Hilo Community Development Plan: The Hilo Community Development Plan, adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975, identifies the vicinity of the subject property for multi-family residential use. The plan predates the subsequent General Plan amendment that redesignated the subject lands to Industrial. 17. Special Management Area (SMA): The subject property is located entirely within the County’s Special Management Area. The property is not a shoreline parcel. The site is located approximately 625 feet east of the Wailoa River/Waiākea Fishpond and approximately 2,300 feet from the mouth of the Wailoa River at Hilo Bay. 18. Chapter 343, Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes: A Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the Talon 1 Properties Self-Storage Warehouse 5 was completed in August 2025 under PL-ENV-2024-000028; it was published in the September 8, 2025 edition of The Environmental Notice. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA 19. Subject Property: The property has historically been used for industrial and warehouse-related activities. Historical records reviewed for the project indicate that portions of the lands now comprising the subject parcel contained warehouse structures associated with commercial and industrial uses. A 1965 aerial photograph depicts a large structure within the project area, later identified during consultation for the Archaeological Inventory Survey as a warehouse used for receiving fresh produce; a dilapidated Quonset hut was also formerly located on the property. By 1990, County records identified an existing nonconforming warehouse on former Parcel 11 that was partially utilized by Hawaiian Sun Products, Inc. for fruit processing, while a warehouse on former Parcel 20 had collapsed and was vacant. The warehouse and Quonset hut were subsequently removed in the early 1990s. The property is currently vacant of structures. Prior to recent clearing, the property contained substantial vegetation and accumulated debris. The site was cleared pursuant to Special Management Area Minor Permit PL-SMM-2022-000012. 20. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20). Properties immediately surrounding the site are largely vacant, with lands farther to the north, west, and southwest zoned Resort-Hotel -750 square feet (V -.75). The Wailoa River State Recreation Area and Hoʻolulu Park complex, located generally north, northeast, and east of the subject property, are zoned Open. Properties to the south and southeast along Piʻilani and Manono Streets are primarily zoned General Commercial-7,500 square feet (CG-7.5) and contain a mixture of retail stores, offices, restaurants, and other commercial uses. The Manono Mini Mart and Luquin’s restaurant are located approximately 130 feet south of the subject property. The Hoʻolulu Park complex, including the Afook-Chinen Civic Auditorium, Francis Wong Stadium, and Walter Victor Baseball Complex, is located approximately 450 to 950 feet east and northeast of the property. Wailoa Plaza and Waiākea Villas are located 6 approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the subject property. 21. FIRM: Zone “X”, an area of minimal flood hazard. 22. Topography and Soils: The property is relatively level. The Final Environmental Assessment identifies soils within the project site as the Opihikao-Urban land complex, while earlier soil information prepared for the area identified Keaukaha Series extremely rocky muck over pahoehoe lava bedrock. Surface runoff and erosion potential are generally limited; however, appropriate erosion and sediment controls will be required during construction. 23. Coastal Hazards: The property is inland of the Wailoa River/Waiākea Fishpond and approximately 2,300 feet from Hilo Bay. The parcel is not a shoreline parcel and is located outside the mapped VE coastal flood hazard area. 24. Recreational Resources: The Wailoa River State Recreation Area and Hoʻolulu Park complex are in the vicinity of the project site. The Final Environmental Assessment concluded that access to Wailoa River State Park via Piʻilani Street would not be affected and that the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to recreational resources. 25. Scenic Resources: The property is located within an urbanized portion of Hilo containing a mixture of commercial, industrial, residential and recreational uses. The proposed three-story building would be approximately 41 feet 8 inches high. The project design incorporates landscaping and architectural treatments intended to reduce visual impacts and reflect elements of the historic architectural character of Hilo. 26. Archaeological/Historic Resources: An Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) was completed for the subject property in 2018. The survey identified one historic site consisting of a concrete slab interpreted as a historic foundation or walkway associated with previous industrial activity on the property. The site was determined significant for its informational value and was adequately documented through mapping, written descriptions, and photography. Four displaced isolated objects associated with historic activities were also documented. In connection with the 2018 Special Management Area Use Permit and Change of Zone amendment applications submitted by Piilani Partners, LLC for a proposed potable water well and bottling 7 facility, the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) reviewed and accepted the AIS. SHPD concurred that the identified historic site had been adequately documented, that no further archaeological work or preservation was required, and issued a determination of “no historic properties affected” for the proposed 2018 project. 27. Cultural Resources: A Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) was prepared for the project in September 2023. The assessment reviewed the cultural and historical context of Waiākea Ahupuaʻa and the broader Hilo area. The property has undergone substantial historic development and disturbance. No ongoing traditional and customary Native Hawaiian practices were identified on the subject parcel. Should previously unidentified cultural or archaeological resources be encountered during construction, work within the immediate area will cease and the State Historic Preservation Division will be contacted. 28. Floral/Faunal Resources: A biological survey conducted in September 2022 did not identify threatened or endangered plant or animal species on the subject property. Vegetation present prior to clearing consisted primarily of non-native trees, vines and grasses. The native plant kaunaʻoa kahakai (Cuscuta sandwichiana) was observed but was not rooted within the property. The property has subsequently been cleared pursuant to an approved SMA Minor Permit. 29. Environmental Site Conditions: An environmental site assessment completed for the property did not identify evidence of recognized environmental contamination on the subject parcel. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan has also been prepared for construction of the proposed development. 30. Public Access: No designated public shoreline or mauka access traverses the subject property. Existing access to the nearby Wailoa River State Recreation Area via public roadways will remain available. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 31. Access: Existing vehicular access to the subject property is from Piʻilani Street, a county roadway with a 60-foot right-of-way and approximately 22 feet of pavement. Mililani Street is presently undeveloped north of Piʻilani Street. The project proposes to extend Mililani Street northward along the western side of the 8 subject property to County dedicable standards. The project plans identify 24-foot-wide two-way access driveways serving the development. The Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, has not provided comments on the current amendment request as of the date of this report. During review of the 2018 amendment request, however, DPW recommended that the portion of Piʻilani Street fronting the subject property be improved to commercial standards, including concrete sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and drainage improvements. DPW also recommended participation in or a fair-share contribution toward future improvements to the unimproved portion of Mililani Street, together with appropriate drainage and traffic-control improvements. These requirements are generally consistent with Conditions H and I of Ordinance No. 92-122. Although the existing right-of-way width meets the minimum 60-foot standard for an urban business and industrial street under Section 23-41 of the Hawaiʻi County Code, the existing pavement width does not meet the 36-foot minimum pavement standard. Accordingly, roadway improvements will be addressed through conditions of approval and subsequent review by the Department of Public Works. 32. Traffic: A Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) was prepared by SSFM International. The analysis evaluated existing 2022 traffic conditions and projected conditions for 2027, 2032 and 2042 with and without the project. Under existing conditions, the study intersections generally operated at acceptable levels of service. The analysis identified potential future operational concerns at the Manono Street/Piʻilani Street intersection as background traffic increases and recommended future monitoring and consideration of intersection improvements, including an all- way stop condition or mini roundabout, if warranted. 33. Water: County water is available from an existing six-inch waterline within Piʻilani Street fronting the subject property. The parcel was previously served by an existing 5/8-inch water meter, which the Department of Water Supply (DWS) indicates is adequate for only one single-family dwelling at an average usage of approximately 400 gallons per day. DWS has requested that the applicant submit water-usage calculations for the uses permitted under the proposed zoning, 9 prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaiʻi, including estimated peak flow and average daily water demand. Based on its review of those calculations, DWS will determine any required water system improvements, applicable facilities charges, meter requirements, including whether a larger or additional meter is necessary, and other conditions of water service. DWS further noted that the existing six-inch waterline within Piʻilani Street and the existing eight-inch waterline within Manono Street are inadequate to provide the required 2,000 gallons per minute of fire flow pursuant to DWS Water System Standards. 34. Wastewater: The project proposes to connect to the County wastewater system by extending the existing sewer line from its terminus near the Piʻilani Street/Mililani Street intersection. Wastewater generation from the proposed self- storage facility is expected to be limited. The Department of Environmental Management may require a sewer line study or related improvements prior to connection with the County sewer system. 35. Drainage and Stormwater: The project will include on-site drainage and stormwater management improvements. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan has been prepared that identifies construction-phase Best Management Practices, including perimeter sediment controls, stabilized construction access, concrete washout controls, and other measures intended to minimize sediment and pollutant discharge from the project site. 36. Solid Waste: Solid waste generated by the proposed use will be collected and transported to an approved County solid waste disposal facility. 37. Essential Utilities and Services: Electrical service will be provided through Hawaiian Electric, with photovoltaic panels also proposed as part of the development. Telephone and other communication utilities are available in the surrounding urban area. Hilo police and fire facilities are located approximately 1.5 miles from the property, and Hilo Medical Center is located approximately four miles northwest. 10 AGENCIES’ COMMENTS 38. Department of Health: (Planning Department Exhibit 3 - July 9, 2026, Memo 39. Department of Water Supply: (Planning Department Exhibit 4 - July 24, 2026, Memo.). 40. Office of Planning and Sustainable Development (OPSD): (Planning Department Exhibit 5 – July 21, 2026, Letter). 41. State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD): (Planning Department Exhibit 6 – August 10, 2018, Letter). 42. County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management (DEM): (Planning Department Exhibit 7 – June 25, 2018, Memo). 43. County Department of Public Works – Engineering Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 8 – June 27, 2018, Memo). AGENCIES - NO COMMENTS OR CONCERNS 44. Police Department. AGENCIES - NO RESPONSE 45. Department of Public Works-Engineering Division & Traffic Division, Department of Environmental Management, Fire Department, Department of Land and Natural Resources Land and Engineering Division PUBLIC COMMENTS 46. None as of the date of this writing SPECIAL MANAGEl\-lENT AREA USE PERMIT APPLICATION COUNTY OF HA WAIi PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) APPLICANT: Robert Garrett/ Talon 1 Properties APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: � DATE: 6/4/2026 -��---------- ADDRESs:525 Piilani St Hilo, HI 96720 LIST APPLICANT'S INTEREST ff NOT OWNER: ----------- LIST PRrNcTPAL(S) 1NcLuorNG NAMES oF MAIN OFFICERS: Robert Garrett PHONE:(Bus.) 808-938-7534 (Res.) 08-938-7534 (Fax) ---- LANDOWNER(S):Talon 1 Propert�es LANDOWNER STGNATURE(S): � DATEfi/4/2O26 LANDOWNER(S) ADDRESs:3333 e cam�ffj�cltrd suite 275 phoenix, arizona 85018 REQUEST: rezoning extension request (Ord. No. 92-122), sma permit approval rezoning extension request (Ord. No. 92-122), sma permit approval TAX MAPKEy(3) 2-2-033:011 ZONT G: ML-20 SIZE OF PROPERTY OR AFFECTED AREA(S): 2.57 acres ------------ AGENT: Robert Garrett ADDREss:3333 e camelback rd suite 275 phoenix, arizona 85018 TELEPHONE:(Bus.) 808-938-7534 (Res.) 808-938-7534 (Fax) Please indicate to whorn original correspondence aJ.1d copies should be senL ORIGINAL: robert garrett coPrEs: 2 ---- --------- SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA USE PERMIT APPLICATION & TIME EXTENSION JUSTIFICATION APPLICANT: Talon 1 Properties / Robert Garrett SUBJECT PROPERTY: 525 Piʻilani Street, Waiākea, South Hilo, Hawaiʻi TAX MAP KEY: (3) 2-2-033:011 PART I: BACKGROUND REPORT & TIME EXTENSION JUSTIFICATION I. PROPOSED ACTION & REASON FOR REQUEST The applicant is requesting a 5-year time extension to comply with Condition C (Final Plan Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122. This ordinance originally reclassified the 2.5712-acre property from Resort-Hotel-Safety-7,500 square feet (V-S-7.5) to the Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20) zoning district. The applicant, Talon 1 Properties, is wishing to build a self storage facility on the property which would require ML zoning. The Precedent for Extension: This request closely mirrors a previous application submitted by the property's former owner, Piilani Partners, LLC. On December 6, 2018, the Windward Planning Commission reviewed Piilani Partners' request for a 5-year time extension on this exact parcel to develop a potable water well and commercial bottling facility. The Commission recommended approval of the extension to the County Council, determining that the non-performance of historical conditions was due to unforeseen economic circumstances and that the extension was not contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. PERMIT/PROPERTY HISTORY July 24, 1991: Effective date of General Plan Amendment Ordinance No. 91 72, which changed the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide ( LUPAG) map designation from Medium-Density Urban to Industrial for the subject property. (Planning Department Ordinance No. 91 72) September 1, 1992: Date of Planning Commission Action on Special Management Area SMA) Use Permit No. 334. (Planning Department SMA No. 334) November 20, 1992: Effective date of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92 122, which changed the zoning of TMKs 2- 2L033: 011, 012, 019 and 020 totaling 2. 5712 acres from the Resort-Hotel-Safety-7, 500 square feet (V-S- 7. 5) district to the Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20) zoning district. October 24, 1994: Effective date of final approval for Consolidation 831- Revised which consolidated TMKs 2- 2- 033: 011, 012, 019 and 020 into one lot. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS State Land Use District: Urban. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: Industrial. These areas include uses such as manufacturing and processing, wholesaling, large storage and transportation facilities, light industrial and industrial- commercial uses. County Zoning: Limited Industrial - 20, 000 square feet (ML-20). Hilo Community Development Plan (CDP): The Hilo CDP, adopted as Planning Commission Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975, identifies the property for Multi-Family Residential (RM-4) use. Special Management Area (SMA): The subject property is situated entirely within the County SMA and is located approximately 1, 969 feet from the nearest coastline. The SMA is part of the Coastal Zone Management Area. The Argument for Reduced Intensity: The current applicant, Talon 1 Properties, is proposing a three-story, 93,603-square-foot self-storage warehouse. By direct comparison, this proposed self-storage facility is a significantly less intense and less environmentally taxing use than the previously approved water bottling plant. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA Subject Property: The subject 2. 5712- acre property is rectangular in shape, fairly level and is situated approximately eleven ( 11) to thirteen ( 13) feet above sea level. The property was previously cleared and used for lumber treatment and warehousing, however it is currently vacant of any structures. It was heavily vegetated and had some abandoned trash and tires, concrete block, burned out cars, needles, and drug paraphernalia on the subject property before the current owner and applicant cleared and cleaned up the property. According to Real Property Tax records, there are two open building permits on the property: a permit for an addition issued in 1981 and a permit to demolish a warehouse in 1993. ● Water Resources: Piilani Partners proposed drilling a deep well to harvest up to 100,000 to 200,000 gallons of water per day from the Mauna Kea aquifer for commercial export. This required intense scrutiny from the Department of Health's Safe Drinking Water Branch due to historic arsenic contamination in the nearby Wailoa River muck. The self-storage warehouse requires practically zero water resources, utilizing only standard municipal flow for basic restroom and maintenance needs. ● Wastewater: The previous bottling plant raised concerns regarding the discharge of unpolluted water into County sewers, which is prohibited under Section 21-8 of the Hawaiʻi County Code. A self-storage facility generates negligible wastewater, eliminating this infrastructure burden entirely. ● Traffic & Operations: The bottling facility required daily manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution truck logistics. Self-storage is inherently passive, generating minimal peak-hour trips and requiring no heavy industrial manufacturing. If a 5-year time extension was deemed appropriate and justified for an intensive, resource-heavy water extraction and manufacturing plant, the same extension is undeniably justified for a passive, low-impact self-storage warehouse that perfectly aligns with the ML-20 zoning. II. COMPLIANCE WITH TIME EXTENSION CRITERIA (SECTION 25-2-61) To grant a time extension, the Planning Director and County Council must evaluate the request against three specific criteria. This application overwhelmingly satisfies all three: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. The applicant, Talon 1 Properties, recently acquired this parcel. The historical non-performance of Condition C and Condition D was entirely under the purview of previous ownership entities (including Suisan Company and Piilani Partners) who failed to execute their respective fish processing and water bottling developments due to unforeseen economic and regulatory hurdles. The current applicant cannot be held responsible for decades of prior inactivity. Since acquisition, Talon 1 Properties has aggressively pursued development, clearing the site of invasive overgrowth and funding comprehensive environmental and traffic analyses. The historical delay was entirely beyond the current applicant's control. 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. Granting the extension perfectly aligns with the General Plan. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map explicitly designates this area as Industrial. The proposed self-storage facility is a permitted, highly appropriate use within the established Limited Industrial (ML-20) zoning district, fully satisfying the code’s intent to provide logistical infrastructure to the community. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the Change of Zone. The original 1992 Change of Zone (Ordinance No. 92-122) was granted specifically to transition this property away from Medium-Density Urban (residential) use and into Industrial use. The County Council formally resolved that encouraging residential development so close to the Wailoa River Estuary and tsunami safety zone was highly inappropriate and dangerous, citing light industrial use as the much safer alternative. Granting this time extension to build a low-density, industrial self-storage warehouse directly fulfills the exact safety and land-use intentions the County Council established when the zone change was originally granted. III. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION JUSTIFICATION The Windward Planning Commission established a clear precedent on December 6, 2018, when they recommended a 5-year time extension for this exact parcel, determining that the failure to construct the originally planned 1990s fish processing plant was beyond the applicant's control. The Commission explicitly stated that allowing industrial development on this site is not contrary to the General Plan, as the LUPAG designation remains Industrial. Talon 1 Properties is now stepping in to fulfill the County's vision for this ML-20 zoned parcel with a $5,000,000 investment. By replacing an intensely extractive commercial water bottling proposal with a highly passive, low-traffic self-storage warehouse, the applicant is drastically reducing the environmental and infrastructural impact on the Waiākea area while still providing an essential industrial service. Therefore, the requested 5-year time extension to secure Final Plan Approval and complete construction is highly justified, historically consistent, and beneficial to the County of Hawaiʻi. PART II: SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA USE PERMIT APPLICATION RESPONSES Section 3: Background Information on the Subject Request 3.B. Detailed written description of the proposed project and a statement of objectives and reasons for the request. Response: We firmly believe this proposed commercial self-storage facility represents a monumental and necessary upgrade for the Waiakea area's infrastructure, turning an underutilized lot into a massive community asset. By constructing a top-tier, multi-story warehouse, we are directly answering a critical, underserved community need for highly secure, localized logistical space. Our architectural strategy is to build a storage facility that will compliment the area by looking beautiful and well-designed. We want to be an asset to the community. We are trying to place the storage facility as efficiently and well designed as we can on the lot, delivering state of the art storage while actively over-delivering on county requirements for loading zones and parking layout to ensure zero traffic bleed onto public streets like Piʻilani or Mililani. Ultimately, our vision is to establish an elite facility that not only resolves practical storage deficits but acts as an economic catalyst by generating steady, reliable local employment and serving as a foundation for community give-back initiatives. Supporting Documentation: "The size and scale of the project has changed from 30,000 square feet of bottling factory... to be a three story, 42' maximum height, self-storage warehouse with two covered porte cocheres (north and south) for sheltered customer loading/unloading" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment) ("The proposed new floor area is 31,201 square feet times 3 floors with a total of 93,603 square feet of enclosed storage space" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The covered porte cochere areas are 2,460 square feet each (times 2) for a total of 4,920 square feet of covered loading and unloading. The proposed grand total including interior and covered exterior area is now proposed to be 98,523 square feet" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Per Hawaii County Zoning Code, the project provides seven 12x50 foot loading zones (requirement is six) and 24 full size parking stalls, including one ADA van accessible stall (requirement is three)." - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment. ("The purpose of the proposed project is to provide the community with much needed storage space, employ residents, and give back to the community" - Page 29 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.C. Description of the subject property in sufficient detail to precisely locate the property. Describe existing uses, structures and topography. Response: In our expert’s assessment, this 2.57-acre property is well-placed for industrial development. Strategically positioned as an ideal buffer zone between the dense commercial retail corridors to the south and the open recreational spaces to the west, it sits perfectly on the corner of Piʻilani and Mililani Streets. The site is completely vacant, recently cleared of all invasive overgrowth, and primed for vertical construction without the need for severe, disruptive grading, thanks to its naturally flat topography. The underlying Keaukaha Series soils and pahoehoe lava bedrock guarantee superior natural drainage, giving us immense confidence in the site's long-term structural stability against erosion and ponding. Before the applicant cleared the property, the property was full of used tires, a large concrete block, and old burned out cars. It is now cleared and ready for construction. It is positioned perfectly outside of immediate shoreline hazards while remaining close enough to the city center to be highly convenient for residents. Supporting Documentation: ("The parcel identified as Tax Map Key (TMK) (3) 2-2-033: 011 lies on the northeast corner of Piʻilani Street and Mililani Street in the Waiakea Houselots" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The site is 2.57-acres of land zoned Limited Industrial ML-20 under Ordinance 1992-122" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The subject Property is within the Special Management Area (SMA), roughly 625 feet east of the Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond. The mouth of the Wailoa River, where it enters Hilo Bay, is approximately 2,300 feet north" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The topography of the subject site is relatively flat with an elevation of approximately 11-16 feet above mean sea level (msl). The topography directs surface flow towards the west." - Page 33 of the Environmental Assessment). The Soil Survey Report, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, classifies the land as Keaukaha Series (rKFD) extremely rocky muck, 6 to 20 percent slopes. ("The soils consist of well-drained, thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock... The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable, but water moves rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight." - Page 5 of Attachment 2 within the Feasibility Study). ("The site was recently cleared under SMA minor permit PL-SMM-2022-000012, approved by the Planning Department on January 16, 2022" - Page 9 of the Environmental Assessment). ("An Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) determined the presence of one historical site (Site 50-10-35-1481.2). It is a concrete slab interpreted as an historic foundation or walkway, a remnant of previous industrial uses on site" - Page 9 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.D. A statement of the valuation of the proposed use, activity or operation. Response: We are fully committed to investing into the South Hilo economy. This project represents a multi-million dollar investment that covers everything from rigorous site preparation to the erection of a high-quality, weather-resilient storage structure. This valuation demonstrates our dedication to utilizing premium materials, engaging top-tier local contractors, and constructing a facility that will stand the test of time while boosting the local tax base. Supporting Documentation: ("Total construction costs are estimated at roughly $5,000,000" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.E. State/County Plans affecting the subject request: General Plan designation and Community Development Plans. Response: Our project is in-line with what the County envisioned decades ago when they strategically re-designated this parcel. We strongly assert that the County's 1990 push to shift this area away from vulnerable residential use toward resilient light industrial activity was incredibly forward-thinking, particularly given the proximity to the tsunami safety zone. The historical record clearly shows the County Council recognized that building homes here was dangerous and inappropriate, intentionally paving the way for structures exactly like our proposed warehouse. We are honoring that legacy by delivering an industrial asset that conforms flawlessly to the Industrial LUPAG designation. Furthermore, our development fits seamlessly into the EnVision Downtown Hilo 2025 plan by activating a long-dormant lot and fostering a sustainable, highly functional commercial environment without compromising the surrounding aesthetics or recreational corridors. Supporting Documentation: ("July 24, 1991: the General Plan Amendment Ordinance No. 91 72, changed the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map designation from Medium-Density Urban to Industrial for the subject Property" - Page 14 of the Environmental Assessment). The historical rationale for this is deeply rooted in county planning: ("The Hawaii County Council adopted Resolution No. 151-90 on March 23, 1990 which requested the Planning Director to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of redesignating the land areas... from Medium Density Urban to Industrial Area" - Page 1 of Attachment 2 within the Feasibility Study). The Council explicitly stated: ("WHEREAS, while this location makes the properties ideal for a fish processing operation it also renders the General Plan's current designation of the property for Medium Density use as inappropriate because such a designation may allow the development of one residential unit for each 1,245 square feet of land; and WHEREAS, the Hawaii County Council believes that the General Plan should not encourage residential developments to occur so close to the Wailoa River Estuary and tsunami safety zone; and WHEREAS, the Hawaii County Council further believes that light industrial activities would be more appropriate uses of the properties" - Page 2 of Attachment 3 within the Resolution). Furthermore, ("EnVision Downtown Hilo 2025 is a 'Community-Based Vision and Living Action Plan' that 'serves as a guide for planning in Downtown Hilo and establishes the strategies and actions for creating an environment that is sustainable, livable, and attractive to its residents, workers, and visitors'" - Page 135 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.F. A written statement discussing the proposed development in relationship to the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter 205A, HRS, and the Special Management Area guidelines as contained herein. Response: This facility satisfies the stringent Coastal Zone Management mandates. Our opinion is that an inland, passive commercial storage warehouse is the absolute highest and best use for this SMA-adjacent parcel. We aren't crowding the shoreline, blocking scenic vistas of the Wailoa River State Park, or interfering with beach transit corridors. By strictly adhering to industrial zoning rather than residential, we are vastly reducing the density of human life exposed to potential coastal hazards, directly fulfilling the mandate to reduce hazard to life and property. Environmentally, the project operates as a fortress; we pose zero risk to the coastal ecosystems because we are completely independent of the estuary networks and will manage all runoff through a rigorously engineered drainage system. Economically, we are turning a vacant, underutilized lot into a massive economic engine that creates jobs and bolsters the local supply chain. We are thoroughly addressing every single objective outlined in Chapter 205A, proving that commercial development and environmental stewardship can coexist perfectly. Supporting Documentation: ("The existing land use and proposed action complies with provisions and guidelines outlined in Chapter 205A, Hawai'i Revised Statues (HRS), Coastal Zone Management (CZM)" - Page 128 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The proposed action is also consistent with Action 16, Session Laws of Hawai'i (SLH) 2020, which amended the HRS Chapter 205A" - Page 128 of the Environmental Assessment). Regarding Recreational & Scenic Resources: ("Wailoa River State Park is located roughly 625 feet to the west of the subject Property and is an open space resource. The park is not visible from the subject site as it is adjacent to an uncleared, vacant lot" - Page 130 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Access to Wailoa State Park via Pi'ilani Street will not be impacted by the proposed action" - Page 129 of the Environmental Assessment). Regarding Historic Resources: ("The Archaeological Inventory Survey identified one site of historical significance... The site was adequately documented; no further work or preservation is recommended at this time" - Page 129 of the Environmental Assessment). Regarding Coastal Ecosystems: ("The proposed action should not generate any adverse impacts to coastal ecosystems. Wastewater will have negligible impacts to coastal resources as it will be handled through the County sewer system. The county sewer line will be extended north from its terminus near the Mililani and Pi'ilani Street intersection. A drainage system, mitigating measures, and BMPs will be established to control storm water runoff" - Page 130 of the Environmental Assessment). Regarding Economic Uses: ("The proposed action would have a very positive impact on the local and State economy. The proposed action would provide stable jobs in multiple fields of work during construction and operation" - Page 131 of the Environmental Assessment). Regarding Coastal Hazards: ("The property is in Flood Zone X, or outside the 500-year floodplain and is not expected to impact or be impacted by significant flooding or coastal hazards. Anticipated sea level rise of 3.2 feet will have no impact on the subject Property" - Page 131 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.G. Surrounding zoning and land uses. Response: In our view, the site sits in a transitional pocket that expertly bridges civic, recreational, and commercial districts. The location sits among adjacent resort-hotel and general commercial zones without adversely effecting them. By maintaining our Limited Industrial footprint, we are providing a necessary, quiet logistical anchor right down the street from the bustling Afook-Chinen Civic Center, Hoʻolulu Park, and the marina. It’s an incredibly dynamic neighborhood, and our low-impact storage facility serves as the perfect, unobtrusive neighbor to these higher-traffic commercial and recreational hubs, ensuring that industrial logistics do not interfere with tourism or public events. Supporting Documentation: ("The subject property is zoned Limited Industrial ML-20. The parcel is bordered by Piʻilani Street to the south and by vacant land to the north, east, and west. Properties further to the north, east and west are Resort-Hotel 750 square feet (V.75), and properties located further south are zoned General Commercial 7,500 square feet (CG 7.5). Open zoning is present on the east side of Manono street where the Afook-Chinen Civic Center lies" - Page 89 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The Hilo marina is located roughly 1,300 feet to the north. Ho'olulu Park is located to the northeast/east, which hosts the Walter Victor Baseball Complex, Francis Wong Stadium, and the Afook-Chinen Civic Center (roughly 800, 950 and 450 feet from the subject Property). The Manono mini mart convenience store and Luquin's restaurant are located approximately 130 feet to the south. Hooganji Buddhist mission is roughly 450 feet to the south. Wailoa Plaza and Waiākea Villas residential complex are located roughly 1,000 feet to the southwest" - Page 89 of the Environmental Assessment). Furthermore, historical context confirms: ("The adjoining properties owned by the State and HELCO are also zoned Resort-Hotel, Safety-.75 square feet (V-S-.75)" - Page 6 of Attachment 2 within the Feasibility Study). 3.H. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designation. Response: We are confident in the long-term safety and insurability of this asset. By sitting comfortably in Flood Zone X, the property completely circumvents the severe risks associated with the 500-year floodplain and the coastal velocity zones. This means we can build a highly secure, ground-level-accessible facility without forcing outrageous foundation elevations or risking our clients' stored valuables to routine coastal inundation or riverine overflow from the Wailoa River. Supporting Documentation: ("According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) classifies the Property as Flood Zone X, which is outside of the 500-year floodplain" - Page 65 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Wailoa River and Waiakea Fishpond are considered principal flooding sources by FEMA. These water bodies are in Flood Zone VE, which is within the 100-year coastal flood range, or 1% chance of occurring in any given year, with velocity hazard (wave action). The subject Property lies slightly east of this special flood hazard area" - Page 65 of the Environmental Assessment). The 1990 feasibility study notes that ("The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) classifies a major portion of the subject site as Zone X, areas determined to be outside 500-year flood plain" - Page 5 of Attachment 2 within the Feasibility Study). 3.I. Archaeological Resources. Response: We take the preservation of Hawaiian history exceptionally seriously, which is why we are fully satisfied with the exhaustive archaeological clearances performed on this site. The lot has been rigorously vetted by professionals, confirming that the only remnants here are from modern, 20th-century industrial activities. Because these elements—an old concrete slab and some displaced 1990s cooling tower platforms—hold zero cultural or historic value and have already been documented to the absolute fullest extent by the State Historic Preservation Division standards, we can break ground with complete peace of mind, knowing we are not disturbing sacred ground or vital artifacts. Supporting Documentation: ("An Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) was conducted by Haun & Associates between April 13th and April 18th, 2018" - Page 92 of the Environmental Assessment). ("An Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) determined the presence of one historical site (Site 50-10-35-1481.2). It is a concrete slab interpreted as an historic foundation or walkway, a remnant of previous industrial uses on site, which is significant for yielding information for understanding historic activity in the area. According to the AIS, the mapping, written descriptions, and photography of Site 1481.2 adequately document it. No further work or preservation has been recommended" - Page 9 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Four 'displaced isolated objects' were also found during the survey and consist of a metal gear, a concrete post, and two concrete platforms. It is thought that the gear and concrete post were likely associated with historical use of the area. The concrete platforms are known to have been placed on the Property in the 1990s to support cooling towers" - Page 92 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.J. Floral and Faunal Resources. Response: From a biological standpoint, this lot is heavily urbanized and entirely devoid of critical conservation value, which makes it perfect for commercial development. The extensive surveys clearly demonstrate that before the applicant cleared it, the site was overrun with aggressive, non-native weeds, vines, and invasive trees. There are no thriving populations of endangered native plants or critical nesting habitats for threatened wildlife here. We are essentially taking an overgrown, invasive-dominated lot and transforming it into a clean, highly managed commercial asset. Even with this lack of critical habitat, we are fully committed to implementing all recommended Department of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) protocols, including shielding our lights and observing tree-cutting seasons, to ensure that transient species passing through the urban corridor are never harmed. Supporting Documentation: ("A biotic survey of the Property conducted on September 14, 2022, found no endangered or threatened species. Previous use of the Property has allowed non-native trees, shrubs, and grasses to populate the site" - Page 81 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Typical vegetation found in the area includes Ironwood (Casuarina equisetifolia), Kukui (Aleurites moluccana), Bingabing (Macaranga grandifolia) African tulip (Spathodea campanulate), Albizia (Facaltaria moluccana), Tropical ash (Fraxinus uhdei), Banyan (Ficus benghalensis), Areca Palms (Areca catechu) and numerous common weedy shrubs, vines, and grasses. One native plant, Kauna'oa kahakai (Cuscuta sandwichiana), was detected on the Property, although it was not rooted in the ground" - Page 81 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Several common birds were also detected during the survey, including Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis), Spotted Dove (Streptopelia chinensis), House Finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), Saffron Finch (Sicalis flaveola), and Japanese White-Eye (Zosterops japonicus). A dragonfly species was also seen flying over the Property but was not identified" - Page 82 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The Indian mongoose (Herpestes a. auropunctatus) was detected near the site. It is also possible for feral cats (Felis catus) and chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) to also be present at times" - Page 82 of the Environmental Assessment). Regarding mitigation: ("The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. Hoary Bats may be sensitive to disturbance between June 1st and September 15th, throughout which no shrubs or trees taller than 15 feet may be disturbed, removed, or trimmed without consulting the DLNR Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW)" - Page 83 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.K. Valued Cultural Resources: Identify any traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights... Response: We recognize the intense history of urbanization, sugar industry activity, and 20th-century industrial use within this specific parcel of the Waiakea ahupua'a. Because the land has been repeatedly graded, altered, and built upon over the last century, traditional cultural practices have long ceased on this specific footprint. We are highly confident that our development will not impede any customary gathering rights or access. However, we maintain a fierce commitment to doing the right thing; should our excavation miraculously uncover any undocumented resources, shells, bones, or lava tubes, we are fully prepared to halt all operations instantly to ensure the State Historic Preservation Division can protect the discovery. Supporting Documentation: ("It is not known whether the Property has been previously used for traditional and customary rights by native Hawaiians. It is unlikely to be used as such today due to previous development and land use on the Property over the past few decades" - Page 9 of the Environmental Assessment). ("In the unlikely event that undocumented archaeological or cultural resources, including shells, bones, midden deposits, lava tubes, or current traditional and customary gathering rights are discovered, all work will cease, and the State Historic Preservation Division will be contacted immediately to determine appropriate action" - Page 9 of the Environmental Assessment). Contextually, ("The ahupua 'a system, divided near the end of the 16th century, or early 17th century, was designed to provide all the necessary resources to live including agricultural resources inland and ocean resources at the coast... Waiākea ahupua 'a is one of the largest in the district, covering over 95,000 acres and provided resources stretching from the sea up to 6,000 feet along the slopes of Mauna Kea" - Page 90 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.L. Public Access: Existing public access to and along the shoreline or to mountain areas and knowledge of whether public access is being used. Response: Our property does not pose a threat to public coastal or mountain access. Our construction and daily operations will be tightly contained within our property lines, ensuring that the public can continue to navigate Pi'ilani Street to reach their recreational destinations. Supporting Documentation: ("The site is located roughly 2,300 feet from the ocean, and 625 feet from Wailoa River State Park where the Wailoa River/Waiākea Fishpond is located" - Page 129 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Access to Wailoa State Park via Pi'ilani Street will not be impacted by the proposed action" - Page 129 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.M. Description of access(es) to the area (e.g. width, type of surface and condition of roadway). If a private roadway, submit evidence of access rights. Response: We are proposing a major off-site infrastructure upgrade by extending Mililani Street to County dedicable standards. This is good for the local traffic grid, allowing us to access our facility with as little impact as possible to Piilani Street. We are happy to provide the extension of Miilani Street to benefit the community. Supporting Documentation: ("Sole access to the site is off Pi'ilani Street" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). Piilani Street is a fully paved, public County roadway. ("Piilani Street is 60 feet wide with a 22-foot wide pavement" - Page 7 of Attachment 2 within the Feasibility Study). Ordinance No. 92 122 stipulates that ("that portion of Piilani Street fronting the project site shall be improved to commercial standards. This improvement shall be constructed in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works" - Page 3 of Attachment 1 within the Ordinance). ("Mililani Street is undeveloped north of Pi'ilani Street, therefore current access is solely off Pi'ilani Street" - Page 14 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Mililani Street is proposed to be extended north from Pi'ilani Street along the west side of the parcel to County dedicable standards" - Page 15 of the Environmental Assessment). Furthermore, the ordinance dictates ("upon the development of parcels along the unconstructed portion of Mililani Street in the immediate vicinity of the subject properties, the applicant shall either participate in the construction of Mililani Street or a fair share contribution of its construction (280 feet)" - Page 3 of Attachment 1 within the Ordinance). 3.N. Traffic impacts assessment of existing traffic conditions, anticipated increase in traffic and traffic impacts from proposed use. Response: We did a traffic study to see how the new traffic would impact the area (is in the EA). Self-storage is inherently a low-traffic enterprise, generating a fraction of the trips associated with retail or heavy manufacturing. However, to ensure we are safeguarding the future of the Hilo grid against general regional growth, we support the TIAR's long-term intersection improvement recommendations. We are entirely supportive of the future implementation of an All-Way Stop Control or even a mini-roundabout at Manono and Pi'ilani Streets if future volumes dictate it. By expanding Mililani Street, we are proactively bleeding off pressure from the main thoroughfares. Supporting Documentation: ("A Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) was completed on July 6, 2022, by SSFM International and is summarized in Section 3.3.1 of this DEA" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). The TIAR evaluated 5 key intersections, noting that currently, at Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street, ("All movements at this unsignalized TWSC intersection resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during AM and PM peak hours" - Page 96 of the Environmental Assessment). Looking forward to mitigate background growth, ("Future 2032 With Project conditions suggest that the eastbound left-through-right lane at Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street will operate at LOS E... It is therefore recommended that an AWSC [All-Way Stop Control] be constructed at the intersection of Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street by 2032" - Page 115 of the Environmental Assessment). To manage long-term volume by 2042, ("Alternatively, a mini-roundabout could be considered at this intersection. A mini-round about would have similar features to a standard roundabout in terms of efficiency, safety, and traffic calming" - Page 115 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.O. Availability of Utilities: Water, telephone, electricity, sewage disposal. Response: We view this site as perfectly primed for utilities, with minimal disruption to the surrounding area. By leveraging the existing six-inch waterline and tapping directly into HELCO while supplementing with our own solar panels, we are building a highly efficient operation. Furthermore, because a self-storage facility produces a negligible amount of wastewater, our extension of the County sewer line will be a simple, low-impact connection that won't overwhelm municipal treatment capacities or require complex on-site septic solutions. Supporting Documentation: ("Electricity will be provided by a Hawaiian Electric Light Company (HELCO) connection and solar panels" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The County sewer line is proposed to be extended north from its terminus near the intersection of Mililani Street and Pi'ilani Street. Wastewater from storage warehouse will be minimal" - Page 15 of the Environmental Assessment). ("County water is available to the site via an existing six (6) inch waterline within Pi'ilani Street fronting the subject Property. The parcel is served by an existing 5/8-inch meter, which allows a maximum daily usage of 600 gallons" - Page 15 of the Environmental Assessment). 3.P. Areas of critical concern delineated by the director. Response: We are extremely pleased that federal authorities agree with our assessment: this property harbors absolutely no critical wetlands or jurisdictional waters that would bog down development with unnecessary federal red tape. It is a dry, clean, industrial lot ready for action. Supporting Documentation: ("A Jurisdictional Determination (JD) was requested from the United States Army Corps of Engineers to certify that the subject property is not under their jurisdiction due to its proximity to Waiākea Fishpond, state wetlands, and nearby anchialine ponds. However, their preliminary review of the site deemed a JD unnecessary at this time" - Page 65 of the Environmental Assessment). Section 4: Anticipated Impacts of the Proposed Development 4.A. Description of environmental setting. Response: We see the environmental setting of this lot as the ultimate standard for commercial readiness in Hilo. The site’s completely flat topography and highly permeable Keaukaha Series soils mean we are dealing with a naturally stable, well-draining foundation that effortlessly mitigates erosion risks. Sitting safely outside the 500-year floodplain in a moderate-noise, urbanized zone with great air quality, the property requires almost no extreme environmental manipulation to become a highly functioning commercial asset. It is precisely the kind of predictable, safe geological profile you want for this structure. Supporting Documentation: ("The topography of the subject site is relatively flat with an elevation of approximately 11-16 feet above mean sea level (msl)" - Page 33 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Soils on the subject Property are made up of Opihikao-Urban land complex (2kl18) with 2 to 20 percent slopes" - Page 37 of the Environmental Assessment). The 1990 feasibility study details this further: ("The soils consist of well-drained, thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock... The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable, but water moves rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight" - Page 5 of Attachment 2 within the Feasibility Study). ("Climate in the subject area is warm and moist, with an average annual rainfall of 130 inches and a mean annual temperature of 75 degrees Fahrenheit" - Page 53 of the Environmental Assessment). ("According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) classifies the Property as Flood Zone X, which is outside of the 500-year floodplain" - Page 65 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The air quality in the vicinity of the Property is generally very good" - Page 83 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Noise near the subject site is moderate. The area is urban and other businesses are present to the east and south" - Page 84 of the Environmental Assessment). 4.B. The relationship of the proposed action to land use plans, policies, and control of the affected area. Response: We are fulfilling the County's long-standing master plan for this specific corridor. The County was absolutely right in 1992 to formally strip this area of residential zoning to prevent dense human populations from occupying a tsunami safety zone. By adhering strictly to the Limited Industrial (ML-20) guidelines, we are delivering exactly what the local government has demanded for over thirty years: safe, low-density, highly utilitarian industrial infrastructure that respects the hazard map while boosting the economy. We are the textbook definition of smart, compliant land use. Supporting Documentation: ("July 24, 1991: the General Plan Amendment Ordinance No. 91 72, changed the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map designation from Medium-Density Urban to Industrial for the subject Property" - Page 14 of the Environmental Assessment). Ordinance No. 92 122 officially changed the 112,000 square foot area's zoning classification to Limited Industrial (ML-20). ("November 20, 1992: Effective date of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92 122, which changed the zoning... to the Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20) zoning district" - Page 14 of the Environmental Assessment). The County supported this to prevent residential development inside a tsunami safety zone, specifically noting ("WHEREAS, the Hawaii County Council believes that the General Plan should not encourage residential developments to occur so close to the Wailoa River Estuary and tsunami safety zone" - Page 2 of Attachment 3 within the Resolution). 4.C. The probable impact of the proposed actions on the environment. Response: Our assessment is accurate: building a passive storage facility on a previously cleared, commercially zoned lot will result in virtually zero negative long-term ecological consequences. We are simply taking an empty, weed-filled lot and transforming it into a highly regulated, tightly managed facility that poses absolutely no threat to local estuaries, groundwater, or wildlife. The economic and logistical benefits to the public far outweigh any microscopic environmental footprint. Supporting Documentation: ("The proposed action will not have a significant adverse impact to environmental quality or ecological systems. Any effect that may result will be minimized to the extent practicable and is clearly outweighed by public health, safety, welfare, and other compelling public interests" - Page 123 of the Environmental Assessment). ("The requested action would not contribute to substantial degradation of environmental quality... Best Management Practices will be strictly followed during construction activities to manage storm water runoff" - Page 146 of the Environmental Assessment). 4.D. Any probable adverse environmental effect which cannot be avoided. Response: We acknowledge that you cannot build a multi-million dollar warehouse without making some noise and kicking up some dirt, but we are extremely confident that the only adverse effects will be strictly temporary and entirely isolated to the active construction phase. Once the heavy equipment finishes the build, the dust settles, and the doors open, the facility will become a quiet, permanent fixture with practically unnoticeable impacts. Supporting Documentation: ("Construction activities would produce minor short-term impacts to noise, air quality, and scenic views, which will be mitigated by Best Management Practices (BMPs)" - Page 8 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Air pollutants during construction will be limited and temporary. The main sources of short-term air pollutants are construction equipment exhaust and dust" - Page 84 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Short-term noise impacts may occur during construction from excavation, grading, vehicle and equipment operation, and the construction of new infrastructure. Most of these impacts will be temporary and mitigated through Best Management Practices" - Page 85 of the Environmental Assessment). 4.E. Alternatives to the proposed action. Response: We fundamentally reject the "No Action" alternative. Leaving this perfectly zoned industrial lot to sit vacant and gather weeds is a complete waste of potential. Before clearing the property, there was documented drug dealing, burned out cars, and it was becoming a dumping zone and unofficial landfill. Because our project strictly requires Industrial zoning, attempting to shoehorn it into another part of town is completely unfeasible. Building here is the only logical choice to satisfy the extreme community demand for storage while delivering an economic boost to the area. Supporting Documentation: ("There are no other action alternatives that could meet the purpose and need of the project. The proposed action requires Industrial zoning and thus has limited site alternatives" - Page 32 of the Environmental Assessment). ("Under a No Action alternative, the storage warehouse would not be built, and no improvements would be made to the land. The lot would remain clear and undeveloped" - Page 32 of the Environmental Assessment). 4.F. Mitigating measures proposed to minimize impact. Response: We are heavily invested in running a clean, compliant, and deeply respectful construction site. Our Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is ironclad, utilizing intense structural barriers like biosocks and concrete washouts to ensure that little to no sediment washes off our site and into the municipal systems or the Wailoa River. We will suppress construction dust, shield our exterior lighting to protect nocturnal wildlife, and ensure our final building design is beautifully landscaped to be a visual asset, not a detriment, to the neighborhood. Supporting Documentation: ("A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was drafted for this Environmental Assessment" - Page 9 of the Environmental Assessment). This SWPPP mandates that ("Biosocks/silt fences will be placed along the perimeter of the site prior to the start of any other construction work... impermeable concrete truck washout basins will be utilized" - Page 74 of the Environmental Assessment). Also, ("Stabilized construction entrance/exit shall be installed at the beginning of the project... Shall be a minimum of 12" thick and 3" to 6" aggregate free of fines" - Page 77 of the Environmental Assessment). For air quality, ("HAR §11-60 on Fugitive Dust prohibits visible emissions of dust from constriction activities. These regulations will be strictly followed to prevent dust impacts to Pi'ilani Street, Mililani Street, and Manono Street" - Page 84 of the Environmental Assessment). To protect wildlife, ("The minimum possible amount of outdoor/exterior lighting should be used and should be turned off when not needed. Motion sensor activated lighting will be used wherever feasible. All exterior lighting should be fully shielded" - Page 86 of the Environmental Assessment). The applicant will also comply with the historical ordinance by giving ("due consideration shall be given to the minimization of noise and adverse visual impacts through appropriate siting, height, bulk, color schemes, signage, and landscaping" - Page 2 of Attachment 1 within the Ordinance). 4.G. Any irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources. Response: We view the commitment of resources here not as a loss, but as a permanent investment in the Hilo community. While we are certainly expending significant financial capital, construction materials, and energy to bring this building out of the ground, we are doing so without destroying any natural, cultural, or historical resources. The physical materials are an irretrievable commitment, but the resulting asset is a permanent, high-value addition to the local economy that will serve families and businesses for decades. Supporting Documentation: ("The proposed action will not involve an irrevocable commitment or loss or destruction of any natural, cultural, or historic resources" - Page 144 of the Environmental Assessment). The primary commitments include the roughly $5,000,000 construction budget, building materials, and the energy required to construct and operate the facility. aa a County of Hawai‘i PLANNING DEPARTMENT www.planning.hawaiicounty.gov Hawai‘i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer planning@hawaiicounty.gov Jeffrey W. Darrow Director Michelle S. Ahn Deputy Director C.Kimo Alameda, Ph.D. Mayor William V. Brilhante, Jr. Managing Director East Hawai‘i Office 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 Phone (808) 961-8288 Fax (808) 961-8742 West Hawai‘i Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokālole Hwy Kailua-Kona, Hawai‘i 96740 Phone (808) 323-4770 Fax (808) 327-3563 Mary Alice Evans, Director Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Environmental Review Program 235 S. Beretania Street, Suite 702 Honolulu, HI 96813 Dear Mary Evans: Subject: Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) (PL-ENV-2024-000028) Applicant: Talon 1 Properties LLC Project: Talon 1 Properties Self Storage Warehouse TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai‘i With this letter, the Hawai‘i County Planning Department hereby transmits the Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FEA-FONSI) for the proposed Talon 1 Properties Self Storage Warehouse project located on the subject parcel (TMK) in South Hilo on the Island of Hawai‘i for publication in the next available edition of the Environmental Notice. In addition to this letter, the Planning Department has also submitted an electronic version of the Environmental Review Program Publication Form and a searchable PDF-formatted copy of the Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the subject project to the online submission portal. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Alex J. Roy, M.Sc. of our Planning Department staff at (808) 961-8140 or via email at alex.roy@hawaiicounty.gov. Sincerely, JEFFREY W. DARROW Planning Director AJR:rms P:\wpwin60\alex_roy\ea_eis_review\talon_1_properties_self_storage\pl-env-2024-000028_erp_letter_fonsi.doc 0455 Jeffrey W. Darrow From:dbedt.opsd.erp@hawaii.gov To:DBEDT OPSD Environmental Review Program Subject:New online submission for The Environmental Notice Date:Tuesday, August 26, 2025 2:29:00 PM Action Name Talon 1 Properties Self Storage Warehouse Type of Document/Determination Final environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact (FEA-FONSI) HRS §343-5(a) Trigger(s) (1) Propose the use of state or county lands or the use of state or county funds Judicial district South Hilo, Hawaiʻi Tax Map Key(s) (TMK(s)) (3) 2-2-033:011 Action type Applicant Other required permits and approvals NPDES, SWPPP, Plan Approval, Grading and Grubbing Permit, Building Permits Discretionary consent required Special Management Area Use Permit Agency jurisdiction County of Hawaiʻi Approving agency County of Hawaii Planning Department Agency contact name ALEX ROY Agency contact email (for info about the action) ALEX.ROY@HAWAIICOUNTY.GOV Email address for receiving comments planning@hawaiicounty.gov Agency contact phone (808) 961-8140 Agency address COUNTY OF HAWAI'I PLANNING DEPARTMENT 101 PAUAHI STREET, SUITE 3 Hilo, HI 96720 United States Map It Applicant Talon 1 Properties LLC Applicant contact name Matthew Kilgore Applicant contact email mkilgore@koaarchitects.com Applicant contact phone (808) 333-3393 Applicant address 347 Andrews Ave. Hilo, HI 96720 United States Map It Is there a consultant for this action? Yes Consultant KOA Architects LLC Consultant contact name Matthew Kilgore Consultant contact email mkilgore@koaarchitects.com Consultant contact phone (808) 217-6707 Consultant address 65-1285C Kawaihae Road Kamuela, HI 96743 United States Map It Action summary The proposed use is a three-floor self-storage warehouse with accompanying restrooms and elevators to serve the tenants. The design includes two porte-cochere on either end, North and South, to allow for large trucks and ADA parking stalls to park under roofed shelter and load/unload to the storage warehouse. The conceptual floor plan includes 88 storage units per floor for a total of 264 storage units within the warehouse. The self-storage warehouse schematic site plan includes 24' wide two-way access driveways at Piilani Street and Mililani Street. The site plan provides for 28 total full size parking stalls including 2 ADA van accessible stalls. The site plan also provides for seven 12x50 foot loading zones for customer convenience. The schematic design is three floors (12'-0" ground floor, 10'-0" floors 2 and 3 for a total height of 41 '-8" which is compliant with the zoning height limit of 45'-0". The schematic design aesthetic is meant to evoke the 1920's era of Hilo Town. Reasons supporting determination The proposed use is consistent with the property class "Industrial" and zoning "ML-20 Limited Industrial District". Attached documents (signed agency letter & EA/EIS) TALON_1_FEA_AUG_2025_unlocked.pdf 2025-08-21-LETTER-TO-MARY-ALICE-EVANS-PL-ENV-2024-000028-FEA-FONSI_unlocked.pdf ADA Compliance certification (HRS §368-1.5): The authorized individual listed below acknowledges that they retain the responsibility for ADA compliance and are knowingly submitting documents that are unlocked, searchable, and may not be in an ADA compliant format for publication. Audio files do not include transcripts, captions, or alternative descriptions. The project files will be published without further ADA compliance changes from ERP, with the following statement included below the project summary in The Environmental Notice: "If you are experiencing any ADA compliance issues with the above project, please contact (authorized individual submitting the project at email)." Shapefile The location map for this Final EA is the same as the location map for the associated Draft EA. Action location map Talon-1-LLC2.zip Authorized individual ALEX ROY Authorized individual email ALEX.ROY@HAWAIICOUNTY.GOV Authorized individual phone (808) 961-8140 Authorization The above named authorized individual hereby certifies that he/she has the authority to make this submission. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Talon 1 Properties Self-storage Warehouse AUGUST 2025 TMK: (3) 2-2-033: 011 Waiakea Houselots, South Hilo, County ofHawai'i, State ofHawai'i APPLICANT: DETERMINING AGENCY: CONSULT ANT: Talon 1 Properties LLC 347 Andrews Avenue Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 County ofHawai'i Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street Suite 3 Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 KOA Architects LLC 65-1285C Kawaihae RoadKamuela, HI 96743 This document is prepared pursuant to: The Hawai'i Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 343, Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS), and Title 11, Chapter 200.1, Hawai'i Department of Health Administrative Rules (HAR) ACTION SUMMARY The proposed use is consistent with the property class "Industrial" and zoning "ML-20 Limited Industrial District" and is a three-floor self-storage warehouse with accompanying restrooms and elevators to serve the tenants. The design includes two porte-cochere on either end, North and South, to allow for large trucks and ADA parking stalls to park under roofed shelter and load/unload to the storage warehouse. The conceptual floor plan includes 88 storage units per floor for a total of 264 storage units within the warehouse. The self-storage warehouse schematic site plan includes 24' wide two-way access driveways at Piilani Street and Mililani Street. The site plan provides for 28 total full size parking stalls including 2 ADA van accessible stalls. The site plan also provides for seven 12x50 foot loading zones for customer convenience. The schematic design is three floors (12'-0" ground floor, 10'-0" floors 2 and 3 for a total height of 41 '-8" which is compliant with the zoning height limit of 45'-0". The schematic design aesthetic is meant to evoke the 1920's era of Hilo Town. Significance Criteria When conducting an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a self-storage warehouse project in Hilo, Hawaii, there are several significant criteria to consider based on the potential environmental impacts of the development. The purpose of the EA is to determine whether the project will have a significant impact on the environment and if it warrants an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Here are the key environmental significance criteria to address: 1.Land Use Compatibility •Zoning and Land Use Designation: Ensure the proposed self-storage facility complies with the zoning regulations of the area. Hilo is governed by specific land use policies thatprioritize conservation, agriculture, residential, and commercial uses.•Consistency with the Hilo Community Development Plan (CDP): The project shouldalign with local plans, policies, and land-use objectives. A deviation from these plans may trigger more intense scrutiny.•Urban Growth Boundaries: Determine if the site is within an urban growth boundary or ifthe proposed project will extend development into agricultural or conservation lands, whichmay require special permits. 2.Geology and Soils •Soil Quality and Erosion: Assess soil types on the site to determine susceptibility toerosion, particularly if the site is located near a coastline or has steep topography.•Landslide or Volcanic Activity Risks: In Hilo, there is potential exposure to volcanichazards ( e.g., lava flow, ash fallout). Assess the potential risks and mitigation measures for such hazards.•Seismic Activity: Given Hawaii's vulnerability to earthquakes, it's important to evaluatethe seismic risks to ensure proper building design to minimize damage during tremors. 3.Water Resources •Surface Water and Groundwater: Investigate the proximity of the site to streams, rivers,or the ocean, and assess the potential for flooding or impacts on water quality. The presenceof wetlands or floodplains could increase the environmental significance.•Stormwater Management: Due to Hawaii's heavy rainfall, effective stormwater management measures must be implemented to avoid flooding and sedimentation into nearby water bodies. Low-impact development strategies may be considered to mitigaterunoff.•Groundwater Protection: Evaluate potential contamination risks to groundwater,especially if the site is near a wellhead or in a sensitive aquifer area. 4.Air Quality •Dust and Airborne Pollutants: Assess construction-related dust and vehicle emissions.Long-term operational impacts from traffic-related air pollution, especially on Hilo's mainroads, should also be considered.•Volcanic Activity: Volcanic emissions (vog) are a notable concern in Hawaii. While this is a more regional issue, assess how the project may interact with existing air qualityconditions. 5.Flora and Fauna •Endangered Species: Hilo is home to several endangered or threatened species of plants and animals. An assessment should be conducted to determine if any listed species arepresent on or near the site. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or Hawaii Department ofLand and Natural Resources (DLNR) can provide guidance.•Habitat Disruption: The project may affect local ecosystems, including coastal habitats,forests, or agricultural lands. Evaluate the potential for habitat destruction or fragmentation.•Invasive Species: Hawaii struggles with invasive species, and new developments canfacilitate the spread of these species. Assess the potential for introducing or exacerbatinginvasive species issues on the site. 6.Cultural and Historic Resources •Cultural Significance: The Hawaiian Islands have a rich cultural heritage. If the site hasany connection to historical or cultural practices (e.g., burial sites, sacred lands), anassessment should be made of potential impacts on cultural resources.•Archaeological Resources: An archaeological survey should be conducted to ensure that the site does not contain historic properties or archaeological sites, particularly as Hilo hasareas with significant Native Hawaiian history.•Traditional Hawaiian Practices: Consider the potential impact on traditional Hawaiianland use practices and access, such as cultural gatherings or gathering of resources ( e.g.,taro cultivation, fishing). 7.Traffic and Transportation •Traffic Impact: Assess the traffic impacts on local roads, particularly if the site is nearbusy areas such as downtown Hilo. The increase in traffic from trucks and customers should be evaluated, including the need for access improvements and potential congestion.•Public Transit: Evaluate the accessibility of the site for public transportation, particularlyif the project is near major residential areas or other transportation hubs.•Roadway Safety and Design: Assess any impacts on road safety, such as increasedcongestion, visibility issues, or the need for traffic control measures (e.g., turning lanes). 8.Noise •Construction Noise: Consider potential noise impacts from construction activities,especially if the project is located near residential or noise-sensitive areas.•Operational Noise: Evaluate noise from vehicle traffic, operational machinery, and security systems ( e.g., lighting or cameras) that may affect surrounding properties. 9.Energy and Utilities •Energy Consumption: Consider the energy demand of the self-storage warehouse, including lighting, security, and other operational needs. Evaluate opportunities for energy efficiency measures or renewable energy sources.•Water and Sewer Systems: The project's water and sewage requirements should bereviewed in consultation with local utilities to ensure that there is adequate capacity and toidentify any necessary infrastructure upgrades.•Waste Management: Assess waste disposal practices during construction and the facility's operation. Ensure the project adheres to local waste management regulations. 10.Climate Change and Adaptation •Sea Level Rise: Consider the risks of sea level rise on coastal properties. Hilo, while relatively safe from extreme weather events, may still face long-term impacts from rising sea levels.•Resilience to Extreme Weather: Given Hawaii's susceptibility to tropical storms,hurricanes, and heavy rainfall, evaluate the building's resilience to these weather events andensure adequate flood-proofing, drainage, and structural design. 11.Cumulative Impacts •Other Projects: Evaluate the cumulative impact of this project combined with otherdevelopments in the area, including infrastructure improvements and urbanization, to determine if the overall effect is significant.•Social and Economic Effects: Consider the socioeconomic impacts, such as job creation,contribution to the local economy, and how the development might affect the quality of lifefor nearby residents. 12.Public Participation and Concerns •Community Consultation: Engage with local stakeholders, including residents, businesses,and cultural organizations, to gauge their concerns and incorporate community feedbackinto the project design and assessment process. 13.Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Mitigation Measures •Implement BMPs for erosion control, stormwater management, and noise abatement duringconstruction. Identify mitigation measures for any identified impacts to reduceenvironmental harm, such as buffer zones, habitat restoration, or noise barriers. Conclusion The environmental assessment process will help to identify and mitigate potential significant environmental impacts of a self-storage warehouse in Hilo. It is essential to consider local conditions, including cultural, ecological, and infrastructure aspects, in the context of state and federal regulations. If any significant impacts are identified, the EA could lead to a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to ensure comprehensive mitigation and planning. Table of Contents SUMMARY SUPPLEMENTAL ................................................................................................... 8 PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EA PROCESS ..................................................... 14 194.1 ...................................................................................................................... . Project Description and Location ................................................................................ 14 194.2 ...................................................................................................................... . Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................ 29 194.3 ...................................................................................................................... . Cost and Schedule ....................................................................................................... 29 194.4 ...................................................................................................................... . Environmental Assessment Process ............................................................................ 30 194.5 ...................................................................................................................... . Public Involvement and Agency Coordination ........................................................... 31 PART 2: ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................ 32 2.1 Proposed Project, Alternative Sites, and Alternative Uses ........................................... 32 2.2 No Action ..................................................................................................................... 32 PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION ........................ 33 3.1 Physical Environment. .................................................................................................. 33 3.1.1 Geology, Geologic Hazards, and Soil ........................................................... 33 3.1.2 Hydrologic Resources ................................................................................... 38 3 .1.3 Flood Zones and Shoreline Setting ............................................................... 65 3.1.4 Water Quality ................................................................................................ 70 3.1.5 Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................. 81 3.1.6 Air Quality, Noise, and Scenic Resources ..................................................... 83 3.1.7 Hazardous Substances, Toxic Waste, and Hazardous Conditions ................. 86 3 .2 Socioeconomic and Cultural ........................................................................................ 89 3 .2 .1 Land Use, Socioeconomic Characteristics and Recreation ........................... 89 3.2.2 Cultural and Historic Resources .................................................................... 90 3.3 Public Roads, Services and Utilities ............................................................................. 94 3.3.1 Roads and Access .......................................................................................... 94 3.3.2 Public Utilities and Services ........................................................................ 115 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................... 119 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals ................................................................................ 121 3.6 Consistency with State and County Plans, Policies, and Laws .................................. 122 3.6.1 Hawai'i County General Plan ...................................................................... 122 3.6.2 Hawai'i County Zoning and Special Management Area ............................. 128 3.6.3 En Vision Downtown Hilo 2025 .................................................................. 135 3.6.4 Water Rights ................................................................................................ 136 3.6.4.1 Hawai'i Constitutional Public Trust Doctrine .............................. 137 2 3.6.4.2 Hawai'i State Water Code ............................................................ 139 3.6.4.3 Correlative Rights Doctrine ......................................................... 143 3.6.5 Conservation District ................................................................................... 144 3 PART 4: DETERMINATION, FINDINGS AND REASONS ................................................ 144 4.1 Determination ............................................................................................................. 144 4.2 Findings and Supporting Reasons .............................................................................. 144 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 151 PART 5: PUBLIC COMMENT & RESPONSES.................................................................. 152 Tables Table 1: SWPPP Sequence and Details of Construction Activities ............................................... 74 Table 2: SWPPP Potential Construction Site Pollutants and Mitigating Measures ....................... 75 Table 3: SWPPP Definitions of Storm Water Control Measures ................................................... 76 Table 4: Flora Found on the Subject Property ............................................................................... 81 Table 5: Peak Hour Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes .................................................................... 96 Table 6: Existing (2022 ) Level of Service ..................................................................................... 97 Table 7: Estimated Vehicular Trips to be Generated by the Island Naturals Complex .................. 98 Table 8: 2027 Future LOS Conditions Without Project ............................................................... 102 Table 9: 2032 Future LOS Conditions Without Project.. ............................................................. 104 Table 10: 2042 Future LOS Conditions Without Project ............................................................. 106 Table 11: Project Related Development Phasing and Trips Generated ....................................... 107 Table 12: 2018 HPMS Surrounding Roadway Volumes ............................................................. 107 Table 13: 2027 Future LOS Conditions with Project.. ................................................................. 110 Table 14: 2032 Future LOS Conditions with Project ................................................................... 112 Table 15: 2042 Future LOS Conditions with Project ................................................................... 114 Figures Figure 1: Location Map .................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2: Site Photo 1 ..................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3: Site Photo 2 ..................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 4: Site Photo 3 ..................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 5: Site Photo 4 ..................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 6: Google Earth Satellite Image of Subject Property and Surrounding Area ..................... 14 Figure 7: Conceptual Site Plan Self-storage warehouse .................................................................. 18 Figure 8: Conceptual Floor Plan of Self-storage warehouse ......................................................... 19 Figure 9: Conceptual Elevations of Self-storage warehouse ......................................................... 20 Figure 10: Conceptual Perspective of Self-storage warehouse ...................................................... 21 Figure 11: (OMITTED FROM SUPPLEMENTAL) ........................................................................ 22 Figure 12: (0 F S) .......................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 13: (0 F S) ........................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 14: (0 F S) ................................................................................. .........................................25 Figure 15: (0 F S) ................................................................................. .........................................26 Figure 16: (0 F S) ................................................................................. .........................................27 Figure 17: (0 F S) .............................................. 28 Figure 18: Underground Injection Control Line (OMITTED FROM SUPPLEMENTAL) .......... 32 Figure 19: Map of 1984 Mauna Loa Lava Flow Advancing Toward Hilo .................................... 34 4 Appendices Appendix A: Environmental Site Assessment Appendix B: Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Appendix C: Archaeological DRAFT Appendix D: Traffic Impact Analysis Report Appendix E: Comments in Response to Early Consultation (Omitted, N.A.) Appendix F: Cultural Impact Assessment Appendix G: State Historic Preservation Division - Approval Letter Appendix H: Archaeological Inventory Survey FINAL Abbreviations AMSL Above Mean Sea Level AWSC All-Way Stop Controlled ASTM AFONSI AIS AADT B.P. BMP CWA CZM CWRM DOH DLNR DPW DWS DOFAW DEA EA EIS EPA FEMA FEA FONS! FIRM GPD GPM GP GHG GDE HAR HCCMAC American Society for Testing and Materials Anticipated Finding ofNo Significant Impact Archaeological Inventory Survey Average Annual Daily Traffic Before Present Best Management Practices Clean Water Act Coastal Zone Management Commission on Water Resource Management Department of Health Department of Land and Natural Resources Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Division of Forestry and Wildlife Draft Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Protection Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency Final Environmental Assessment Finding ofNo Significant Impact Flood Insurance Rate Map Gallons Per Day Gallons Per Minute General Plan Greenhouse Gases Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems Hawai'i Administrative Rules Hawai'i Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission 6 SUMMARY OF PROJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES (SUPPLEMENTAL CHANGE OF USE & SIZE) The use of the project is a minimal resources required self-storage warehouse. The size and scale of the project is to be a three story, 42' maximum height, self-storage warehouse with two covered porte cocheres (north and south) for sheltered customer loading/unloading. The proposed new floor area is 31,201 square feet times 3 floors with a total of93,603 square feet of enclosed storage space. The covered porte cochere areas are 2,460 square feet each (times 2) for a total of 4,920 square feet of covered loading and unloading. The proposed grand total including interior and covered exterior area is now proposed to be 98,523 square feet. Per Hawaii County Zoning Code, the project provides seven 12x50 foot loading zones (requirement is six) and 24 full size parking stalls, including one ADA van accessible stall (requirement is three). Talon 1 Properties LLC is proposing to construct a self-storage warehouse on the subject site located at 525 Pi'ilani Street. The parcel identified as Tax Map Key (TMK) (3) 2-2-033: 011 lies on the northeast comer of Pi'ilani Street and Mililani Street in the Waiakea Houselots (herein referred to as "Property") (Figure 1-5). The site is 2.57-acres ofland zoned Limited Industrial ML-20 under Ordinance 1992-122. Sole access to the site is off Pi'ilani Street. The subject Property is within the Special Management Area (SMA), roughly 625 feet east of the Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond. The mouth of the Wailoa River, where it enters Hilo Bay, is approximately 2,300 feet north. On-site infrastructure is expected in the form of driveways, parking, electrical, water supply, storm water management, and wastewater disposal. Electricity will be provided by a Hawaiian Electric Light Company (HELCO) connection and solar panels. County water will be used for onsite potable uses. Estimated County water use calculations will be submitted to DWS for review and approval. Off-site infrastructure improvements will be required to support traffic and wastewater. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) was completed on July 6, 2022, by SSFM International and is summarized in Section 3.3.1 of this DEA. The proposed project would also require the extension of the County sewer line from its terminus near the intersection of Pi'ilani and Mililani Street. The line is proposed to be extended north from Mililani Street to mitigate impacts to Pi'ilani Street. A detailed discussed on wastewater and measures to mitigate potential impacts to water quality can be found in Section 3.1.4. Total construction costs are estimated at roughly $5,000,000. Construction is planned to commence upon completion of permitting and design, with full buildout by 2025. Construction activities would produce minor short-term impacts to noise, air quality, and scenic views, which will be mitigated by Best Management Practices (BMPs ). Potential impacts to noise, air quality, and scenic resources during operation will be discussed in detail in Section 3.1.6. 8 A biotic survey conducted on September 14, 2022, confirmed that no endangered or threatened species exist on the Property. The site was recently cleared under SMA minor permit PL-SMM-2022-000012, approved by the Planning Department on January 16, 2022. Typical vegetation that remains on the Property includes non-native trees, vines, and grasses. One native plant known as Kauna'oa kahak:ai (Cuscuta sandwichiana) was also detected, although it was not rooted in the ground. An Environmental Site Assessment was completed for the subject site in 2018. No current or past evidence of contaminants were found on the Property. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was drafted for this Environmental Assessment and is summarized in Section 3.1.4. An Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) determined the presence of one historical site (Site 50-10-35-1481.2). It is a concrete slab interpreted as an historic foundation or walkway, a remnant of previous industrial uses on site, which is significant for yielding information forunderstanding historic activity in the area. According to the AIS, the mapping, writtendescriptions, and photography of Site 1481.2 adequately document it. No further work orpreservation has been recommended. The survey also found four 'displaced isolated objects' butthey are not considered significant historical resources. It is not known whether the Property has been previously used for traditional and customary rights by native Hawaiians. It is unlikely to be used as such today due to previous development and land use on the Property over the past few decades. In the unlikely event that undocumented archaeological or cultural resources, including shells, bones, midden deposits, lava tubes, or current traditional and customary gathering rights are discovered, all work will cease, and the State Historic Preservation Division will be contacted immediately to determine appropriate action. The proposed action does not conflict with County or State laws. Discretionary permits required for the proposed action include a Special Management Area Use Permit (SMA-Major) and a Time Extension Request to complete the outstanding conditions of Rezone Ordinance 1992-122. Ordinance 1992-122 changed the district classification of the Property from Resort-Hotel, Safety (V-5-.75) to Limited Industrial (ML-20) in 1992. Other permits and approvals required at the State and County level can be found in Section 3.5. Establishment of the proposed use will not be contrary to the objectives sought to be accomplished by State Land Use Laws and Regulations. 9 CTJ-;-T.;:D FEil H! \':i9 )�. ,r 1 1,,,c !:·; It( �I,;• I ; l:le-t ._:i'UI Subject Property - j '( II. y_ : l i d -· 7 .---1/ kAWt:=.LOLANf � :i7"'...... fl'.,n,/,';qp£tJ,. so,.6a0f (ill - •luf) CH,.-,_,,-.. , .. C,rm-.-V. ¢d; -LN.)l,r 0 ·1, .-. lk1f::,.) r,-,t,.-.. .-,.. H-./1/r;(Cclmf-y .::.JH:aw ·J (/.1,:,,,nul.l.l r X uz:,1;,0N) .l:'kct,:-.On:f.3t'll'O •,847 A&L (ro-.,.14.I) t.·�':,:·� ----------- .,,, .!"LAT i !{ • .. ,,·-�---·-:"'r",.,.-5 T_R_/<-, ,·,I .,.i-· .... ,,.,,,.�,,,,,·'·,.�_o_• __ M_;_ Pl/LANI PLAT]: i ii 11. '-.' .. t .... q( H. 'ITM-Zli (C-?l.lnr'y of H-M.;-iJ 1- looL.VVLU 5TRE.E.T 34 J .t ,, • "'< ' .. 7 -,.nH t,1 •• :l>r' .. f- "'" H, .. ,,.-:,'f tC-.,,:,''fa-.e ,41 .. ,.-.11/,·.r E"<'-............ ": ... 41 81,E,40J I.I· II IIIH . � • -�,,_t_,,;.'l•l .... , :--. .... " � -;, , ... <- :9 ... � ::., '• .. ,. .. PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EA PROCESS 1.1 Project Description and Location The subject site is located on an undeveloped lot on the northeast comer of Pi'ilani Street and Mililani Street, roughly 3 00 feet west of the Pi' ilani and Manono Street intersection. Mililani Street is undeveloped north of Pi'ilani Street, therefore current access is solely off Pi'ilani Street. The subject Property is roughly 625 feet east of the Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond. The mouth of the Wailoa River, where it enters Hilo Bay, is approximately 2,300 feet north. Surrounding land uses include the Hilo marina located roughly 1,300 feet to the north, Ho'olulu Park located roughly 450 feet to the east, The Manono mini mart convenience store located 130 feet to the south, and Wailoa Plaza and Waiakea Villas roughly 1,000 feet to the southwest (Figure 6). Figure 6: Google Earth Satellite Image of Subject Property and Surrounding Area According to Planning Department records, the Property has the following permit history: 1.July 24, 1991: the General Plan Amendment Ordinance No. 91 72, changed the Land UsePattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map designation from Medium-Density Urban toIndustrial for the subject Property.2.September 1, 1992: SMA Major Permit (SMA) 334) was approved for a fish processingcenter but has since been revoked (by the previous landowner) and is no longer valid.3.November 20, 1992: Effective date of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92 122, whichchanged the zoning ofTMKs 2-2-033: 011, 012, 019 and 020 totaling 2.5712 acres fromthe Resort-Hotel-Safety-7,500 square feet (V-S-7 .5) district to the Limited Industrial-20,000 square feet (ML-20) zoning district. 14 4. October 24, 1994: Effective date of final approval for Consolidation 831-Revised, whichconsolidated TMKs 2-2-033: 011, 012, 019, and 020 into one lot identified by the currentTMK: (3) 2-2-033: 011. 5.January 16, 2022, a SMA minor permit (PL-SMM-2022-000012) was granted to the current applicant for land management activities including clearing the Property of overgrown invasive trees and shrubs, and construction of a fence around the Property perimeter. The proposed action would include both onsite and offsite improvements including buildings, driveways, infrastructure for electrical, water supply, storm water and wastewater management, roadway development, and County sewer line extension. The size and scale of the project is to be a three story, 42' maximum height, self-storage warehouse with two covered porte cocheres (north and south) for sheltered customer loading/unloading. The proposed floor area is 31,201 square feet times 3 floors with a total of 93,603 square feet of enclosed storage space. The covered porte cochere areas are 2,460 square feet each (times 2) for a total of 4,920 square feet of covered loading and unloading. The proposed grand total including interior and covered exterior area is now proposed to be 98,523 square feet. Per Hawaii County Zoning Code, the project provides seven 12x50 foot loading zones (requirement is six) and 24 full size parking stalls, including one ADA van accessible stall (requirement is one). Figures 7-16 show the preliminary site plan, conceptual designs, and factory floor plans. Utility poles are located on the northeast and southeast comers of the parcel. Electricity will be provided via Hawaiian Electric Light Company (HELCO) and solar panels. The subject Property is located above 'unconfined basal aquifers' recognized by the State of Hawai'i Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM) as the Hilo Aquifer (80401) and the Onomea Aquifer (80204). These basal aquifers are used as municipal water sources. The change of use self-storage warehouse would NOT propose to drill a well. {SUPPLEMENTAL CHANGE OF USE-NO WELL PROPOSED) The 'deep confined aquifer' was discovered by the Hawai'i Scientific Drilling Project (HSDP) in 1993. This aquifer is located roughly 1,000 feet below sea level and is 'confined' by a 100-foot- thick soil layer that is identified as the contact surface between Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea lavas. This impermeable soil layer separates the deep confined aquifer from the Hilo and Onomea basal aquifers located above it. Figure 17 (NOT USED IN SUPPLEMENTAL CHANGE OF USE TO STORAGE) 15 An Environmental Site Assessment completed in 2018 found no evidence of current or past contamination on the subject site. The complete report can be found in Appendix A. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan was developed to outline Best Management Practices during and after construction to prevent storm water from impacting other sites and the Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond. The full report can be found in Appendix B. An Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) determined the presence of one historical site (Site 50-10-35-1481.2). The site is adequately documented, and no further work or preservation is recommended. The full AIS report can be found in Appendix C. Off site infrastructure improvements are expected in the form of roadway improvements and an extension of the County sewer line. Mililani Street is proposed to be extended north from Pi'ilani Street along the west side of the parcel to County dedicable standards. The TIAR discusses two (2)potential future road alternatives to mitigate anticipated traffic impacts in 2032 and 2042 atthe Pi'ilani and Manono Street intersection. These will be discussed in Section 3.3.1. The fullTIAR report can be found in Appendix D. The County sewer line is proposed to be extended north from its terminus near the intersection of Mililani Street and Pi' ilani Street. Wastewater from storage warehouse will be minimal. County water is available to the site via an existing six (6) inch waterline within Pi'ilani Street fronting the subject Property. The parcel is served by an existing 5/8-inch meter, which allows a maximum daily usage of 600 gallons. 16 26 4 S T O R A G E U N I T S = 3 P A R K I N G S T A L L S R E Q U I R E D W I T H 1 A D A S T A L L ( 2 8 P R O V I D E D ) 15'5'15'5' 10' 40'40' 20'- 0 14" 21'-1 34" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 12 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 11 46 4 5 4 4 4 3 42 41 4 0 3 9 3 8 3 7 35 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 0 2 9 2 8 2 7 2 6 2 5 24 36 47 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 57 5 8 5 9 6 0 6 1 6 2 6 3 6 4 6 5 6 6 6 7 56 88 8 7 8 6 8 5 8 4 8 3 82 8 1 8 0 78 77 7 6 7 5 7 4 7 3 72 71 7 0 6 9 6 8 79 1 6 7 12 13141516 17 28 MI L I L A N I S T R E E T PIILANI STREET 15'-0" 40'-8" 15 ' - 0 " 77 ' - 0 " 47 ' - 0 " 24'-0" 24 ' - 0 " PL PL SE T B A C K SETBACK BLD G . TO P L BL D G . TO P L 93 , 6 0 3 G F A S E L F S T O R A G E = 6 L O A D I N G Z O N E S P E R 2 5 - 4 - 5 6 FU T U R E PH A S E 23' - 0 " 24' - 0 " 12X 5 0 L O A D I N G Z O N E 12X 5 0 L O A D I N G Z O N E 12X 5 0 L O A D I N G Z O N E 12 X 5 0 L O A D I N G Z O N E 12X50 LOADING ZONE 24 ' - 0 " 36'-4"123'-0"35'-6" rubbish 12X 5 0 L O A D I N G Z O N E A1 SITE PLAN MR K MR K D R A W I N G T I T L E :C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : P R O J E C T # 2 3 0 7 D R A W I N G N O : R E V I S I O N S I S S U E # D A T E D A T E IS S U E © 20 2 4 K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C Th e d e s i g n s a n d c o n c e p t s s h o w n a r e t h e sol e p r o p e r t y o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s . T h e dra w i n g s m a y n o t b e u s e d e x c e p t w i t h t h e writt e n c o n s e n t o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C K O A A R C H I T E C T S , L L C SELF-STORAGE WAREHOUSE TALON1PROPERTIES LLC 525 PIILANI STREET HILO, HI 96720 TMK (3) 2-2-033:011 SE P 2 0 2 4 EA & S M A 0 10 ' 2 0 ' 4 0 ' SI T E P L A N SC A L E : 1 " = 2 0 ' - 0 " TRUE NORTH 1 A B C D E F G 2 3 4 6 13 14 7 8 9 10 11 12 -2" -2" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 12 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 11 46 4 5 4 4 4 3 42 41 4 0 3 9 3 8 3 7 35 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 0 2 9 2 8 2 7 2 6 2 5 24 36 47 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 57 5 8 5 9 6 0 6 1 6 2 6 3 6 4 6 5 6 6 6 7 56 88 8 7 8 6 8 5 8 4 8 3 8 2 8 1 80 78 77 7 6 7 5 7 4 7 3 7 2 7 1 7 0 6 9 6 8 79 5 PORTE COCHERE PORTE COCHERE A2 FLOOR PLAN MR K MR K 0 FL O O R P L A N D R A W I N G T I T L E :C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : P R O J E C T # 2 3 0 7 D R A W I N G N O : R E V I S I O N S I S S U E # D A T E D A T E IS S U E © 20 2 4 K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C Th e d e s i g n s a n d c o n c e p t s s h o w n a r e t h e sol e p r o p e r t y o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s . T h e dra w i n g s m a y n o t b e u s e d e x c e p t w i t h t h e writt e n c o n s e n t o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C K O A A R C H I T E C T S , L L C SELF-STORAGE WAREHOUSE TALON1PROPERTIES LLC 525 PIILANI STREET HILO, HI 96720 TMK (3) 2-2-033:011 SE P 2 0 2 4 EA & S M A NORTH 14-8" 41-8" BLDG. HEIGHT 10-6"10-6"4 12-9" 45 14-8" 41-8" 10-6" 10-6"4 10-6" A3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS HC MR K SO U T H E L E V A T I O N - P I I L A N I S T . SC A L E : 1 " 1 0 D R A W I N G T I T L E :C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : P R O J E C T # 2 3 0 7 D R A W I N G N O : R E V I S I O N S I S S U E # D A T E D A T E IS S U E © 20 2 4 K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C Th e d e s i g n s a n d c o n c e p t s s h o w n a r e t h e sol e p r o p e r t y o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s . T h e dra w i n g s m a y n o t b e u s e d e x c e p t w i t h t h e writt e n c o n s e n t o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C K O A A R C H I T E C T S , L L C SELF-STORAGE WAREHOUSE TALON1PROPERTIES LLC 525 PIILANI STREET HILO, HI 96720 TMK (3) 2-2-033:011 SE P 2 0 2 4 EA & S M A WE S T E L E V A T I O N - M I L I L A N I S T . SC A L E : 1 " 1 0 NO R T H E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 " 1 0 EA S T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 " 1 0 A4 CORNER PERSPECTIVE HC MR K D R A W I N G T I T L E :C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : P R O J E C T # 2 3 0 7 D R A W I N G N O : R E V I S I O N S I S S U E # D A T E D A T E IS S U E © 20 2 4 K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C Th e d e s i g n s a n d c o n c e p t s s h o w n a r e t h e sol e p r o p e r t y o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s . T h e dra w i n g s m a y n o t b e u s e d e x c e p t w i t h t h e writt e n c o n s e n t o f K o a A r c h i t e c t s , L L C K O A A R C H I T E C T S , L L C SELF-STORAGE WAREHOUSE TALON1PROPERTIES LLC 525 PIILANI STREET HILO, HI 96720 TMK (3) 2-2-033:011 SE P 2 0 2 4 EA & S M A 3D P E R S P E C T I V E - S T R E E T C O R N E R SC A L E : n o t t o s c a l e 1.2 Purpose and Need The purpose of the proposed project is to provide the community with much needed storage space, employ residents, and give back to the community. 1.3 Cost and Schedule The proposed action to construct the storage warehouse is expected to cost roughly $5,000,000. Construction is anticipated to begin in 2025. See Section 3.5 for a list of the required County and State permits and approvals that must be obtained before construction can commence. 1.4 Environmental Assessment Process In 1974 the Hawai'i State Legislature enacted the Hawai'i Environmental Policy Act (HEPA), which requires State and County agencies to conduct an environmental impact analysis prior to making decisions on actions that may impact the environment. This Environmental Assessment (EA) is being conducted in accordance with Chapter 343 of the Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS), along with the implementing regulations, Title 11, Chapter 200.1, of the Hawai'i Administrative Rules (HAR). This law is the basis for the environmental impact assessment process in the State ofHawai'i. An EA is necessary for the proposed project as improvement of County land would be required. This includes the extension of the Mililani Street Right-of-Way north to the west side of the subject site, extension of the County sewer line north from its terminus near the intersection of Mililani Street and Pi'ilani Street, and possible intersection improvements. According to Chapter 343, an EA is prepared to determine impacts associated with a proposed action, develop mitigation measures for any discovered adverse impacts, and determine whether the impacts are significant (according to the thirteen specific criteria). If a study concludes that no significant impacts would occur from implementation of the proposed action, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONS!) is prepared. If a study finds that significant impacts are expected to occur because of a proposed action, then an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is prepared to allow deeper investigation of impacts and allow more extensive public involvement. The following EA discusses alternatives to the proposed action, existing environment and impacts associated with the proposed action, the anticipated determination and the findings made by the applicant in consultation with the County ofHawai'i Planning Department and the expert consultants who prepared supporting studies for this EA. 1.5 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination Agency coordination and public involvement are crucial components of the environmental assessment process to understand the impacts caused by the proposed action. The agencies, organizations, and individuals below have been consulted as part of the environmental assessment process. Copies of correspondence during the early consultation period can be found in Appendix E. Department of Land and Natural Resources, Land Division Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife Department of Land and Natural Resources, Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands Department of Land and Natural Resources, Engineering Department of Land and Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Hawai'i Department of Transportation Office of Hawaiian Affairs Sierra Club of Hawai 'i The Nature Conservancy ofHawai'i State Department of Health Office of Planning and Sustainable Development Commission on Water Resource Management U.S. Army Corps of Engineers County: Private: Planning Department Fire Department Police Department Department of Environmental Management Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Civil Defense Aha Moku of Hilo Dr. Donald Thomas, Geochemist, Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology (HIGP), School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST), University of Hawai' i at Manoa Surrounding Property Owners within 300 feet of subject parcel Tom Nance, Water Resource Engineer Hawaiian community members through public outreach meetings PART2:ALTERNATIVES 2.1 Proposed Project, Alternative Sites, and Alternative Uses There are no other action alternatives that could meet the purpose and need of the project. The proposed action requires Industrial zoning and thus has limited site alternatives. No other alternative sites have been identified and are therefore not discussed in this Environmental Assessment. NOT USED WITH CHANGE OF USE STORAGE WAREHOUSE Figure 18 shows the Underground Injection Control Line in relation to the subject Property. Areas located makai of the line are highlighted in blue. Underground Injection Control Lines (UIC) --- HAW.a Su1h¥idtt GlS Program _ H1-111!il:llt"IY<•dGGl'5.Pr09",1m Summary O.tait5 B =u':\_.¥.,.. (D :-,: J:t�9 0 =��020 B �.!:���. -�!w��II (1) Figure 18: Underground Injection Control Line in Relation to the Subject Property 2.2 No Action 0. ... jjj Under a No Action alternative, the storage warehouse would not be built, and no improvements would be made to the land. The lot would remain clear and undeveloped. This EA considers the No Action alternative as the baseline for this project and all environmental effects will be based off this alternative. PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION 3.1 Physical Environment The subject Property is located roughly 625 feet east ofWailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond, which is contiguous with Hilo Bay and the Pacific Ocean. The mouth of the Wailoa River, where it enters Hilo Bay, is approximately 2,300 feet north. The topography of the subject site is relatively flat with an elevation of approximately 11-16 feet above mean sea level (msl). The topography directs surface flow towards the west. 3.1.1 Geology, Geological Hazards, and Soils Environmental Setting: Volcanic Activity The subject Property is located on the northeastern flank ofMauna Loa Volcano. The site is in Lava Zone 3, on a scale ranging from 9 to 1, ranking least hazardous to most. Mauna Loa is the largest active volcano on earth, rising over 13,500 feet above sea level and extending to a depth of 16,400 feet below sea level. The sea floor is depressed another 26,250 feet due to the volcano's enormous mass. Therefore, from the base to the summit, Mauna Loa is more than 56,000 feet high (HVO, 2022). Since 1843, Mauna Loa has erupted 33 times with an average of one eruption every five years. Exceptions to this pattern occurred during a 25-year hiatus between 1950 and 1975 and a 38-year hiatus from 1984 to 2022. On Sunday November 27, 2022, an eruption began in the summit caldera, Moku'aweoweo. After some hours, new fissures opened along the Northeast Rift Zone. By December 2, the eruption was limited to one fissure, which advanced less than 2 miles from Saddel Road. On December 13, 2022, the eruption ceased. The most recent lava flow to threaten Hilo occurred in 1984. The flow reached within 4 miles of the city center. Figure 19 shows a lava flow map depicting the advancement (identified as flow "F"). Figure 20 is a photo of the lava flow taken from the Hilo Airport on April 4, 1984. The 1984 lava flow remains the first and only Mauna Loa eruption to have been well monitored and documented. Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (HVO) scientists were able to collect detailed observations of activity at vents located on the northeast rift zone and points along the lava channels that were moving towards Hilo. The data collected has developed current flow models that forecast how long a lava flow may extend, and what path it could potentially take, to better evaluate and protect Hilo against future lava flow threats (HVO, 2022). Despite Mauna Loa's active history, the subject Property has not been inundated by a lava flow for 1,000 to 2,000 years. The Property is located on a Mauna Loa flow identified as the Pana'ewa picrite flow (p212), which occurred 1,000 to 2,000 years Before Present (B.P.). The composition of the flow is pahoehoe with greater than 5 percent olivine and plagioclase (Figure 21). 'A'a lavas associated with this flow are located to the south. Also located to the south is the 'Ainaola Drive picrite flow (pl0el), which occurred 9,000 to 10,000 years B.P. with over 15 percent olivine content. To the west of the Property, on the other side ofWaiakea Fishpond, is the Kino'ole Street flow (a9j3). This lava flow is 8,000 to 9,000 years B.P. and has a mixed composition of olivine and plagioclase (Trusdell and Lockwood, 2017). 33 Kulani Priaon 10 LO ERS _____, Figure 19: Map of 1984 Mauna Loa Lava Flow Advancing Toward Hilo Figure 20: Mauna Loa Flow Approaching Hilo; View from Hilo Airport on April 4, 1984 34 � Hilo lnternat o 1c1I Airport ,.,. •212 El Table 3. Explanation of map unit labels, colors, and patterns for Mauna Loa, Island of Hawa.i'i, Hawaii. [a.tip uni 1.abell tcw lava� and ven1 deposits consfsl of lour pan, N1 k1enl1fy flow rno,phology, now� group. phenoc.ryst mlne,atogy, and now nu'l'i)e, In 11'1 age group. F« llafflptl, LN p10l1 ti a pane.no. IJOW (p) Olltecl 9.000 lO 10.000 ratlOca.fOon yr 8.P. (10) UW OClfUllns >15% Oliwl• phflnocrySLS (•) andb: lhl yCUfGtil flow k\� Group ,o (1). Mat•nalSdaled indude cha,coai, roots, M9, vagMallV8 titl.,, 0r unale,ed wood (rarely). Al ages are reponed n radiocarbon yr B.P (befo,1 the calendar year dalJ.m oC A.O. 1950). Pyroxene Is noc an a�nt phenooryglIn Ma� Loa lava lows and, lhlrtfort, is not hcludtd st phtnocryst rnlntrak,gyl Flow morphology 0ettu; for uampJe p10e1) W Spancr, t<pbra. and cind<l"•f� dcpo,it, p 1"1hochoc a •A':I G Mixtd 'a'?I and p:ihoehCM:: I Littoral � Ashdeposits Flow age group {numbt".r; tor example pl.Qe1) A.O. 1843 wid yuungc1 A I) IQRd now AD. 1942 0ow A.O. I 935-36 flow AU. IXWflow A.O. 1880-81 flow A.O. I 85S-56 flow A.O. 1852 0ows A.O. 1843 0ow Pre-A.D. 1832 to 1.000 yr B.P. I ,000-2,000 )T B.P. 2.000-3,000 yr B.P. 3,000-4,000 yr B.P. 4,000-5,000 yr B.P. 5,000-6,000 yr H.P. 6,000-7,000 yr H.P. (oot in map ar<a) 7,000--R,000 y, RP. Flow age group (number; for uample p!.Qe1}-Contmut-d 8,000-9,000 yr B.P 9,000-10,000 yr B.P. 10,000-15.000 yr 8.P. 15,000-20,000 yr 8.P. 20,000-30,000 yr 8.P. 10 II 12 11 14 15 30,000-100,000 yr B.P. (not in mop or-ea) >100.000 yr-8.P, (not in map area) Pheaeocry�t 1ni.11erulo&1 (letltt; fore.i.:1u11plc p10C1) a Apharut1c(<l�ofanym1ncral) b 1-S'li olivine c S-IOCI, olivine 10-15<11 olivine >ISc.\.ol!VtDC Variable amount., of olnino (2,-30%) g t-5� plll8)0Cl..,e S-IO'J, plagiocl:J<e Muted. 1-S'i\ olivmc + 1-5� plagioclasc Macd, >5'1t olivine+ 1-5� plapoclasc Mixed, 1-5� olivine+ >5'11 plagioclnsc L\llu.ed, >S% olivine+ >S% plagiocltie Flow numhr In ai,:e group {nurobe.r; for u-ampli!.p10&1) Youngest now in any age group Next youngcsl flow in any age group Figure 21 Environmental Setting: Earthquake Activity The USGS recently came out with a model of earthquake probability for the Hawaiian Islands, which better estimates hazard probability compared to previous models. The ground shaking model indicates that Hawai'i Island has a greater than 90 percent chance of experiencing an earthquake with slight (or greater) damage during the next 100 years (Figure 22). t= N N t= N 0 N 1so·w 159°W Chance of slight ( or greater) damaging earthquake shaking* in JOO years • cqul\alcnt 10 Mod,licd Mcrcalli lntcn 11y VI. 158°W I Population density per km2 25-250 ->250 1s1·w 1ss·w 1ss·w Figure 22: 2021 USGS Model of Earthquake Probability for the Hawaiian Islands The Hilo area is susceptible to ground shaking from earthquakes originating near Mauna Loa and KIiauea volcanoes. It is not uncommon to experience frequent slight tremors in Hilo as a result. Larger events, however, occur much less frequently and are more difficult to predict. Three significant earthquake events to cause structural damage in Hilo occurred in 1973, 1975, and 2018. In 1973, a magnitude-6.2 earthquake struck 29 miles beneath the town ofHonomu, just north of Hilo. The depth of the earthquake is what caused such widespread and severe damage. Eleven people were reported injured in Hilo, four of which were hospitalized. An unknown number of injuries were also reported in Waimea. Approximately $5.6 million dollars of structural damage was recorded across the island (~$40 million today). In 1975, a magnitude-7 .2 earthquake struck the southern flank of KIiauea volcano near the town of Kalapana and caused significant shaking throughout the entire island. This earthquake event also caused significant subsidence along southeastern shores of the island. Most recently, the 2018 KI1auea eruption proved to be historic in many ways, including the magnitude-6.9 earthquake that rattled the entire island. This earthquake caused significant shaking throughout Puna and Hilo. There were even some reports of shaking as far as O'ahu. 36 Mauna Loa is not currently erupting but continues to produce small-magnitude (below M3.0) earthquakes below the summit and upper-elevation flanks. During the first week of August 2022, a swarm of over 200 earthquakes below a magnitude-3.0 were recorded in this area. The majority of these earthquakes occurred at shallow depths less than 9 miles below sea level. According to the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (2022), "This activity is a relatively small increase in volcanic unrest and remains within the range of fluctuations observed over the past several years." Mauna Loa has an Alert Level of "Advisory" and Color Code, "Yell ow" because rates of seismicity remain slightly elevated above long-term background levels. Environmental Setting: Soil Soils on the subject Property are made up of Opihikao-Urban land complex (2kll8) with 2 to 20 percent slopes. These soils are made up of organic material over pahoehoe lava flows, they are well drained, and have a high runoff class. This Property is not considered to be prime farmland and has a soil classification of D (Web Soil Survey, 2022). Impacts and Mitigating Measures The proposed action will not increase the potential of volcanic activity, earthquakes, or adversely impact soil. The proposed site is far from any volcanic rift zone of Mauna Loa or Mauna Kea; therefore, no intrusive rocks, alteration, or high temperature fluids are expected to be encountered. Best Management Practices for construction activities will be strictly followed to prevent adverse impacts to soil. Hawai'i Administrative Rules Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, under Special Conditions for Land Disturbances, describes the following construction management techniques to protect soil: 37 Below this impermeable layer, a deep confined freshwater aquifer was encountered at approximately 1,000 feet below sea level. The aquifer is roughly 400 feet thick and has significant artesian pressure, producing a well flow rate of roughly 2,100 gallons per minute (gpm). Although the well flow rate value indicates characteristics of an underground river system, it is not a direct reflection of the rate the aquifer is flowing and discharging. This will be discussed further below. Thomas, Paillet & Conrad summarize the characteristics of the deep confined subject aquifer in a 1996 article describing the geochemistry and regional flow patterns found during the HSDP: "A deeply buried .freshwater aquifer is supplied by high elevation recharge trapped beneath an aquiclude formed by the soil horizon marking the interface between Mauna Kea and overlying Mauna Loa basalts. Water moving through this system is discharged in deep submarine springs in the Puna Canyon and estimates of fluid transport rates suggest that this process has the potential to account for a significant volume of high elevation recharge to Mauna Kea. " Coincidently, in the 1970's, deep submersible studies conducted off the eastern flank of the island within Hilo Bay, identified freshwater springs at 1,000 feet below sea level. These studies confirm that the deep confined aquifer is an actively flowing system that is discharging into the ocean at depth. Scientific evidence suggests that the impermeable layer capping the deep confined aquifer (made up of ash and clay) was deposited subaerially, or above sea level, by a young Mauna Kea lava flow. Eventually, subsequent lava flows from Mauna Loa and island subsidence over time, moved the impermeable layer and freshwater aquifer down to 1,000 feet below sea level. The deep confined aquifer is therefore technically part of the Mauna Kea Aquifer System, which further supports evidence that the subject aquifer is being recharged within Mauna Kea. Figure 27 below is a conceptual model created by the HSDP incorporating the newly discovered deep confined structure of ground water systems. After the discovery of the deep confined subject aquifer, the HSDP tested the isotopes of the freshwater to determine the water's age and source elevation at which the rainfall originated on the slopes ofMauna Kea. To understand this, the principal isotopes of water must be looked at. These include Oxygen 180/160 and Hydrogen 2H/1H. Delta Oxygen 18 (8 180) looks at how much the Oxygen 18 (180) content of water differs from ocean water. Ocean water is considered the "reference water" because it has a value of zero (0) Delta Oxygen 18 (8180). When water is evaporated from the ocean, it loses its heavy oxygen isotope content by up to 13 percent (water vapor in clouds above the ocean have a 8180 value of -13%). However, as clouds move inland, water vapor condenses and becomes more enriched in 180. Rainfall over the shoreline has an increased value of 8180 compared to water vapor in clouds over the ocean by up to 10 percent. The isotopic composition of water vapor continues to change as it moves up slope in elevation. When rain lands on the earth's surface, it maintains its isotopic composition as it percolates into ground water resources. Isotopes of water in aquifers therefore become a way to trace ground water back to its source elevation (Thomas, 2018). Figure 28 and 29 depicts a figure and graph of the isotopic composition changes of water from ocean to mountain slopes. 43 180 is preferentially removed by precipitation 8180=-13%0 160 evaporates more easily than 180 180=-14%0 •••••••• • • • • It I I 1BQ=-3%o Figure 28: Isotopic Composition Changes of the Hydrological Cycle (Thomas, 2018) -2 -4 -6 -8ro -10 -12 -14 0 Rayleigh condensation from oceanic vapor --- • • Condensate in equilibrium with oceanic vapor r • volume-weighted average 110 data •••• . ---• HSDP •• Temperature lapse rate, / Hawaiian Islands •• • Elevation range for temperature inversion � 1000 2000 3000 Elevation (m) • 400 25 20 15 � :::J +J ro (1) E (1) +J ro :::J C C 10 ro C ro (1) � 5 From Scholl et al 1995 Figure 29: Graph oflsotopic Composition Changes of Water with Elevation (subject aquifer value depicted in the blue square) (Thomas, 2018) 45 Pu'ukapu Hawa11an Home La�d N1emt Hawa11an Home Land -??- : .. -.,,.Jll�� .. . -.... · ....... , ............... � •: -., �,... .. ·• .. .-,o-' HAWAII COUNTY IY; .. 'e Figure 30 Po :1kuloa Mill ry Res e 200 Po :1kuloa Mill ry Res e 200 Go 5tations Other Stations �ov DecJAnnJ ► � o uloa lrtary R erve - MA N •' Figure 32 n lnduraled hy loci lite Ocean floor •At 700 feet below the ground surface was the initial stable saturated zone.•700 feet to 830 feet a perching layer of clay-rich ash was encountered, and water levels began to drop.•830 feet to 1,800 feet was dry rock.•1,800 feet was a second saturated interval.•1,800 feet to 5,780 feet water levels in the borehole remained stable. It is thought that thisdeeper water is likely the regional water table for this area. The findings indicate that ground water occurs at much shallower depths than previously thought, and that a dike-impounded aquifer system is present. The second test hole was drilled roughly 6 miles west of the PTA-2 borehole. In contrast to PTA-2, this borehole encountered a sequence of confined and pressurized aquifers beginning at 980 feet below the ground surface. According to HGGRC (2018), "Layers of soil, ash, or explosive eruptive deposits confined these aquifers as highly pressurized water trapped between impermeable layers. As we drilled into the aquifers, water came spouting from the point of entry to up the drill string from several hundred to several thousand feet." The HGRP successfully proved that aquifer systems exist between 6,000 feet above sea level and roughly 1,200 feet below sea level, where the deep confined subject aquifer is discharging. Another way to describe this concept would be as a virtual pipeline from mid-elevation on Mauna Kea down to submarine discharge in Hilo Bay. This means that the subject aquifer is continuously being recharged by extensive aquifer systems located at higher elevations above it and that the water is not confined there; it is constantly flowing in the ocean at depth. Impacts and Mitigating Measures Contamination of a fresh ground water source can be divided into two ( 2) main areas of concern regarding the proposed action: 1.Wastewater contamination 2.Storm water runoff 51 The Property will be connected to the county sewer line to handle wastewater. Construction Best Management Practices and mitigating measures to prevent storm water runoff are outlined in detail in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.4. 3.1.3 Flood Zones and Shoreline Setting Environmental Setting: Floodplain and Tsunamis The subject property is located within the State Civil Defense Agency, Tsunami Evacuation Zone (Figure 40). According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) classifies the Property as Flood Zone X, which is outside of the 500-year floodplain (Figure 41). Wailoa River and Waiakea Fishpond are considered principal flooding sources by FEMA. These water bodies are in Flood Zone VE, which is within the 100-year coastal flood range, or 1 % chance of occurring in any given year, with velocity hazard (wave action). The subject Property lies slightly east of this special flood hazard area. H,lo Bay, Wailoa River. 1c Tsunami Museum antyclostd .. H1 Bayt.o, t 8 P rk le .. Chief Eleme � t p1e,lan1t'\ v oolY Wailuku River. Kowao Mokuola wa,loa River State ecreatlon Area Coconut Jsl�t 1d .. 111uokolan1 Gardens Subject l'roprrh � oo u:u F ark �.,,.� +._,, \. Hawai'i h Park -... Community II s, . � �- I< B y Be�ch Park Reeds Ba P( f i Q 't(.e\(.uanaoa St ./ Figure 40: Tsunami Evacuation Zone in Relation to the Subject Property 65 Flood Hazard Assessment Report Property Information COUNTY: HAWAII TMK NO: (3) 2-2-033:011 WATERSHED: WAI LOA PARCEL ADDRESS: ADDRESS NOT DETERMINED HILO, HI 96720 Flood Hazard Information FIRM INDEX DATE: LETTER OF MAP CHANGE(S): FEMA FIRM PANEL: PANEL EFFECTIVE DATE: Notes: SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 NONE 1551660904F SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN A TSUNAMI EVACUTION ZONE: YES FOR MORE INFO, VISIT: http://www.scd.hawaii.gov/ THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN A DAM EVACUATION ZONE: FOR MORE INFO, VISIT: http://dlnreng.hawaii.gov/dam/ NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD -The 1% annual chance flood (100-year), also know the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. SFHAs include Zone A, AE, AH, AO, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation (BFE) is the water surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. Mandatory flood insurance purchase applies in these zones: Zone A: No BFE determined. Zone AE: BFE determined. Zone AH: Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); BFE determined. Zone AO: Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. Zone V: Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no BFE determined. Zone VE: Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); BFE determined. Zone AEF: Floodway areas in Zone AE. The floodway is the channel of stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1 % annual chance flood can be carried without increasing the BFE. NON-SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA -An area in a low-to-moderate risk flood zone. No mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply, but coverage is available in participating communities. Zone XS (X shaded): Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. Zone X: Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. OTHER FLOOD AREAS Disclaimer: The Hawaii Department af Land and Natur al Res ources (DLNR} as sume s na respo nsibility ar is ing from the use, accur acy, completenes s, and timelines s af any infarmatian contained in this rep or t. Viewers/Users ore res ponsible for ver ifying the accur acy of the informati on and agree to indemnify the DLNR , its officers, and employ-ee s from any liab ility which may ar ise from its use of its data or information. Zone D: Unstudied areas where flood hazards are undeter-mined, but flooding is possible. No mandatory flood insurance this map has been identified as 'PRELIMINARY'. please note that it is being prov ided for informational pur poses purchase apply, but coverage is available in participating commu-and is not to be used for flood insur ance rating. Contact your county floodplain manager for flood zone determino-nities. ,__ti_o_ns _to_b_e_u_s _e_d _fi_or_c_o_m_p_l_ia_n_c _e _w_it_h_l_oc_a_l_fl_o _o _dp_l_a_in_m_an_a_g_e_m_e_n_t _�_eg_u_l_ati_·o_n_s _. Tsunamis in Hawai'i can be generated locally or from a distant source. Local tsunamis have minimal warning and response times. A local tsunami can be generated from an earthquake, surface faulting, liquefaction, and landslides (Tetra Tech, 2020). Distant tsunamis can travel across the Pacific from locations such as Chile, Alaska, and Japan. Several tsunamis have impacted Hilo Bay since the 1800s, ranging from small to severe. Hilo Bay is well known for its horseshoe shape, which has caused tsunami waves to funnel and increase in height drastically. According to the Pacific Disaster Center, the most devastating tsunamis to hit Hilo occurred in 1946 and 1960. On April 1, 1946, a magnitude-7.1 earthquake originated in the Aleutian Islands of Alaska. This earthquake generated a succession of seven tsunami waves that impacted Hilo Bay and Laupahoehoe Point with no warning. The maximum wave height reached 55 feet. A total of 170 people were killed in the event. The loss oflife prompted the establishment of the Pacific Tsunami Warning System in 1948. Fourteen years later, in 1960, a magnitude-9.5 earthquake occurred in Chile. It is known as the Valdivia or Great Chilean earthquake, the largest earthquake recorded in the 20th century.Initially, a series of tsunami waves to reach Hilo Bay were just over 3 feet, however, subsequent waves grew to over 35 feet, taking the lives of 61 people. Despite ample warning, some residents refused the evacuate their homes, potentially due in part to two smaller tsunamis, which occurred in 1952 and 1957 that caused minimal damage to the area. Additionally, with the initial waves reaching under 5 feet, some residents who had evacuated returned to their homes before the larger waves hit. Whole city blocks were swept clean of buildings and 580 acres were flooded. Figure 42 shows approximate tsunami travel time in hours from Alaska and Chile. Tsunami Travel Time in Hours from 1964 Earthquake in Alaska Figure 42: Potential Tsunami Travel Times in the Pacific Ocean 67 Impacts and Mitigation Measures According to the Hawai'i County Hazard Mitigation Plan, potential flooding from storm damage is relatively low in the lower Waiakea area due to the effectiveness of the Wailoa and Waiakea Uka Flood Control Projects. Since the Property is also outside of the 500-year floodplain, overall flooding risk for the site is low. A topography survey also found no evidence of any drainage issues. Tsunami warning sirens are situated in the area to alert residents of an evacuation event. Tsunami evacuation route signs are posted within the designated zone to identify the best possible route to follow. The warning sirens are routinely tested and can be clearly heard from the subject site. Environmental Setting: Sea Level Rise and Storms It is likely that sea level rise and more frequent and intense storms will affect the Hawaiian Islands due to a rapidly changing climate. The Hawai'i Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission (HCCMAC) states that sea level rise is expected due to the increase of anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas emissions into the atmosphere. "Sea level rise is an inevitable outcome of global warming that will continue through many centuries even if human-generated global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were stopped today. Sea level is rising at increasing rates due to global warming of the atmosphere and oceans and melting of the glaciers and ice sheets. Rising sea level and projections of stronger and more frequent El Nifio events and tropical cyclones in waters surrounding Hawai'i all indicate a growing vulnerability" (HCCMAC, 2017). Scientists predict that global mean air temperatures will increase by 2. 7 °F by the end of the century. Increases in air temperatures will subsequently lead to increased ocean temperatures, which are expected to be the highest in tropical and subtropical areas of the Northern Hemisphere. The IPCC's "business as usual" scenario predicts that global sea levels will rise by 3.2 feet by the end of the 21st century (IPCC, 2014). There are varying theories regarding when these rising levels will be felt globally. HCCMAC suggests the sea level rise of 3.2 feet can expected by 2100, however, IPCC (2014) and Fletcher (2010), claim this level may be experienced as early as 2060. Hawai'i Island is expected to be the least vulnerable compared to neighboring islands, but areas such as Kona, Puako, Kapoho and Hilo Bay may "face serious threats." Figure 43 displays a 3.2-foot sea level rise in relation to the subject Property. The Big Island is also sinking into the Earth's mantle because of the gravitational weight of its growing volcanoes, which can contribute to perceived sea level rise. Relative sea level rise is a result of the combined eustatic water rise and land subsidence. Tidal records taken in Hilo and Honolulu since 1946 show higher sea level rise on Hawai'i Island, compared to O'ahu. Many factors could contribute to this variability; however, the most likely explanation is subsidence. Moore and Fornari (1984) studied drowned reefs off the northwestern coast of Hawai'i Island. Their studies suggested a regional rate of subsidence between 1.8 and 3 millimeters per year over 68 ness & Center Mohouli Pond ,, ng Authority ,,., ,i-#' Waiakea Stream �,s'-.,,. ... ,i-o ... Cl-- �,s,,S' .... « Banronr Hwy � \ \(e\l.uana�a St 1, tJiat\l.OS\ ·"'ff)� -y..�0\1,'S\ -?-% 'il Kowao Mokuola Francis Wong Stadium [l"oo�M � P i:: Subject Property !a C !a Hualam St 11uala 'lt Kekuanaoa St � 2. !a ® 0/d Gent'ral Lyman,,('1f>' 1 AirJ>ort Rd ..,.f' I cl' �b Kamehameha Ave kekuanaoa S\ BASEMAPS EXPOSURE Cl Sea Level Rise Exposure Area 0 (SlR-XA) a, b, and c combmed area) mformation on rut estate disclosure 0.5 ft 1.1ft 2.0 ft � 3.2 ft C Passive Flooding 0 I na1or lands C Annual High Wave Flooding 0 i a "lac andOahuony C Coastal Erosion 0 al , y VULNERABILITY C Potential Economic Loss 0 C Flooded Highways 0 OTHER OVER LA VS expand • collapse • clear • hide �e\l.uanaoa St i � Youth Challeng, Academy Hilo ,q ...,�" <:- PacIOOS' Mapdata02022 TermsofUH R�amap..-ror Figure 43 shown that the water exceeds the State's water quality standards. The list is updated every two (2)years, most recently in 2022. Figure 44 shows current impaired water bodies in red. According to the 2022 State ofHawai'i Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report: "The Hawai'i State Department of Health (DOH) is obligated by the Clean Water Act (CWA) Sections 303(d) and 305(b) to report on the State's water quality on a two-year cycle ... The CWA [Section] 305(d) requires states to submit a list of waters that do not attain applicable water quality standards (WQS), plus a priority ranking of impaired waters for Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) development based on the severity of pollution and the uses of the waters." The main WQS parameters assessed in this report include fecal indicator bacteria ( enterococci), turbidity, chlorophyll a, nutrients (total nitrogen, nitrate+nitrite-nitrogen, ammonium-nitrogen, total phosphorus), and where applicable, total dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus, total suspended solids, and orthophosphate. Water quality issues from algae, murky water, and nitrogen and/or phosphorus buildup are noted for Hilo Bay, and nitrogen and/or phosphorus for Waiakea Fishpond. Waiakea has an additional water quality concern of arsenic found in the sediment at the bottom of the pond, which is the result of pollution from a former canec plant that operated over ¼ mile from the subject Property in the early to mid 1900's. This will be further discussed in Section 3.1.7. Water quality can be impacted by both point and non-point source pollution such as construction and storm water runoff. Approximately 2.52 acres ofland will be disturbed by the proposed construction activities. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will therefore be required. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared for the environmental review process and is summarized below. A full copy of the report can be found in Appendix B. A drainage study will be completed to establish any additional BMPs and mitigating measures necessary. Offsite road work would also include drainage mitigation which could potentially improve conditions in the area with regards to storm water runoff. Impacts and Mitigating Measures The proposed action does not pose a significant adverse risk to water quality, aquatic, or marine habitats. The proposed action is also not expected to have any impact on surface water resources. 71 ,,/'----..1 /,.,. ...,..,'"tt ,, +�-+-�,l> ,..,\._\,t-Hilo p,.a\aLn q ,.,. c,•· 'fi K p ,. q ,.,. "" "" ..., t-.. .,,, .,_ "" <>, ,;, .,.••, ·�'\l '\l '\l , -... , r, ' '\ I 84�H "'00<Hwy---------� .- .. .. ..,, .. .. .... ott,.d "',. .. _ '\l Kamehameha Ave 9 ,;; 0 C 0 C � I I ,-- Plll•nl St ,;; 0 KUl#i St ,;; 0 c \ \ \ " ' I \ ,- Figure 44 Hawaiian Kingdom Brands will ensure all earthwork and construction will be conducted in compliance with the following rules and regulations: (a)"Storm Drainage Standards," County ofHawai'i, 1970 and as revised (b)"Flood Control", Chapter 27 of the Hawai'i County Code(c)Standards and regulations of the Federal Emergency Agency (FEMA)(d)"Erosion and Sedimentation Control", Chapter 10 of the Hawai'i County Code( e)Conditions of an NPDES permit and any additional Best Management Practices requiredby the Board of Land and Natural Resources (f)Conditions of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, if required The proposed action will create impermeable surfaces on the Property, which can increase the volume and rate of storm water runoff. However, as per Hawai'i County Code, Chapter 27, the volume of storm water leaving the site will not increase. A County grading permit, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, and a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit are required since the Property will be considered an industrial site. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was prepared for this DEA by Engineering Partners, Inc. according to Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Chapter 11-55 with specific reference to Section 7 of Appendix C. The SWPPP describes the procedures that will be used to prevent non-point source pollution from spreading beyond the project site during construction. A full copy of the report can be found in Appendix B. HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.1, requires a storm water team to oversee the development, modification, and implementation of the SWPPP. This team will be made up of the Civil Engineer of Record, General Contractor, and Construction Project Manager, who will have the following responsibilities: A.Civil Engineer of Record: Yen Wen Fang, P.E. 1.Write the initial draft of the SWPPP and any revisions necessary to obtain approval from the Department of Health, Clean Water Branch. B.General Contractor (To Be Determined):1.Install and maintain storm water runoff controls and Best Management Practices(BMPs) through the duration of the construction.2. Conduct weekly inspections of the site to check storm water runoff control measures and BMPs to detect violations of and conditions which may causeviolations.3.Take immediate corrective action to repair, modify, or replace any storm water control; clean up and properly dispose of spills and releases; remedy a permitviolation. 4.Notify the Construction Project Manager of any violations, and corrective actionstaken with regard to the storm water controls, BMPs, the Permit, and the SWPPP. C.Construction Project Manager (To Be Determined):1.Oversee construction of the project and provide construction managementservices. 73 2.Submit additional information/documents necessary to complete the NPDESpermit to the owner.3.Submit information/documents for compliance with the NPDES permit conditions to the owner. 4.Conduct periodic site inspections for compliance with permit conditions. Checkstorm water runoff control measures and BMPs to detect violations of andconditions which may cause violations.5.Recommend modification of the SWPPP to the owner. Recommendations shall be based on site observations and input by other storm water team members. 6.Maintain records of any modifications to the SWPPP including monthly reports. 7.Ensure members of the storm water team are aware of changes to the SWPPP andensure changes are implemented by the General Contractor at the constructionsite.8.Immediately notify the owner of any violations, and corrective actions taken withregard to the storm water controls, BMPs, the Permit and the SWPPP. 9.Notify the owner of situations or occurrences which may impact use of operationof the facility or its employees and users. The following three tables (1-3) outline the sequence and details of proposed construction activities, potential construction site pollutants and mitigating measures, and descriptions of each control measure. Table 1: SWPPP Sequence and Details of Construction Activities Construction Activity Duration Details Biosocks/silt fences will be placed along the perimeter of the site prior to the start of any other construction work. They Install Perimeter BMPs One (1) Week will remain in place throughout the duration of the project to act as filters for storm water entering and exiting the project site. Interior BMPs will be installed as applicable based on the progress of the Install Interior BMPs NIA project. For example, impermeable concrete truck washout basins will be utilized but these will not be necessary until concrete work begins. Includes the excavation and embankment within the project site prior to any structural improvements. The Rough Grading Four (4) Weeks initial stockpile/ storage area( s) will be created during this phase and sediment trapping wattles will be installed to surround their perimeter. 74 Retaining walls would be constructed throughout the site. Concrete truck Retaining Walls (if needed) NIA washout basins will be installed prior to any concrete trucks arriving onsite for the construction of the retaining walls. Underground piping for electrical, Underground Utilities Six (6) Weeks sewer, water, and other utilities will be installed in this phase. Includes the installation of the building framing and exterior finish. No Building Erection Eight (8) Weeks additional BMPs are required for this work but the stockpile/storage areas may need to be modified. Includes bringing the site up to final Finish Site Grading and Paving Four (4) Weeks grades and the installation of Portland cement concrete pavement. Site Finish Work and Includes the installation of planting, Landscaping Four (4) Weeks painting, and other minor finishing work required. This task may not begin until the project has been accepted as complete by the Removal of Temporary BMPs One (1) Week owner and a maintenance period has elapsed, allowing all finishing to be cured and planting to be established. Table 2: SWPPP Potential Construction Site Pollutants and Mitie:atine: Measures Activity Pollution Issue Miti2atin2 Measures Grading activities leave bare earth Sediment trapping wattles will be exposed to weather, which may installed to intercept storm water Rough and Final result in sediment being transported runoff as it enters and exits the Grading by storm water, introducing project site. These wattles will additional turbidity to receiving filter the runoff, preventing waters. sediment from being released. 75 1.Concrete pours will beconducted in dry weather andcovered if rain should come after the pour has started. Cement and other concrete are 2.Concrete truck washout will pollutants, which may affect turbidity be directed to an impermeable and pH of water. These pollutants basin where water will be Concrete Pours may be released while concrete is allowed to evaporate, and the still in its plastic stage. Once the remaining sludge will be concrete has reached its initial set, disposed of offsite. there is no longer potential for these 3.The sediment trapping wattles pollutants to be released. installed around the perimeter ofthe site will act as filters if anyconcrete is contained in the stormwater runoff. Paving will be scheduled for sunny days to allow for maximum cure time prior to rainfall contacting new AC Pavement AC paving has the potential to pavement. 2. The sediment release oils. trapping wattles installed around the perimeter of the site will act as filters if any concrete is contained in the storm water runoff. Fertilizers typically contain high Sediment trapping wattles Fertilization for levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, and installed around the perimeter of Landscaping potassium, which can result in algal the site will act as filters if any of blooms or other unwanted vegetative these nutrients are contained in growth if they are released. the storm water runoff. Table 3: SWPPP Definitions of Storm Water Control Measures Control Measure Description Sediment barrier composed of permeable geotextile filter fabric attached to support posts will be installed at the perimeter of the Silt Fence project site prior to any ground disturbing activities. Silt fence intercepts the flow of sediment laden runoff, which filters the water and traps the sediment. 76 Sediment Trapping Mulch filled sediment trapping wattles will be installed to surround the stockpiles and storage areas as well as to surround drywell and Wattles (Biosock) catch basin inlets. Stabilized construction entrance/exit shall be installed at the Stabilized Construction beginning of the project to access construction site from paved Entrance/Exit roads. Shall be a minimum of 12" thick and 3" to 6" aggregate free of fines. This stabilized construction entrance/exit will reduce the amount of sediment tracked off-site by construction vehicles. Fill materials will be compacted as they are installed. This activity is Compaction intended to prevent future settlement as traffic loads are placed upon the fill but has the added benefit of making these areas less susceptible to erosion. Areas of the project site that do not receive pavement (including Vegetation gravel pavement) will be vegetated after applying topsoil. This activity stabilizes the soil and provides beautification of the area. Figures 45-47 show the BMP site plan and details. See the full SWPPP report in Appendix B for inspection, maintenance, and corrective action; staff training; and compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act. Each of these procedures will be strictly followed according to HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.12, 7.2.13, and 7.2.14. According to the Low Impact Development Guide (LID) Section 3.3.2 General Performance Standards, industrial areas are defined as "hotspots", which are required to use specific structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) and pollution prevention practices. These mitigating measures will be specified during the permitting process following the guidelines outlined in the LID. Wastewater would be handled by the County sewer system. The County sewer line is proposed to be extended north from its terminus near the Mililani Street and Pi'ilani Street intersection, meeting the approval of the Department of Environmental Management and the Department of Health. Efforts to minimize wastewater from the proposed project will be discussed in Section 3.3.2. 77 / ,--f--I I w I I I w I et::: I --- f-- _J :r: w ••••·· •••••·· .. .. .. .. .. .. ..•♦ •♦ .. .. .. .. .. .. •••••••...... ZON[ X ••••••···· ••···· .. zo •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NEV[ OUT I IN ..... •··� TMK: 2- ZONE: V •·s1 o.oo' --1 ao· ••••••••••• ••. M I L I •••••••••••••••• ••♦ • . . L .. ..... - -,_\______\. ..·• ..LEGEND r;'\ A ____ B_M_P_S_IT_E_P_L_A_N_0 __ 4--i-0, __ 80, \!2j SCALE: 1" = 40' 3: 0 <( 0 et:: 0 w �I c.n X w 0 CRUSHED AGGREGATE GREATER THAN 3 IN. BUT SMALLER THAN 6 IN 12 IN MIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER SECTIONB-B NTS 50' MIN. OR FOUR TIMES THE CIRCUMFERENCE ORIGINAL GRADE OF THE LARGEST CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE TIRE, 0----CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ONLY SIGNS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY SIGNS TO PROPERLY INFORM THE PUBLIC OR AS DIRECTED BY THE DIRECTOR MATCH EXISTING GRADE PLAN NTS B GRAVEL BAG FILTER, TWO LAYERS HIGH IMPERMEABLY-LINED TRAPPING BASIN (SEE PLANS FOR SIZING AND LOCATION) STABILIZED CONST. ENTRANCE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE :z 2 0 n PROTECTED AREA SANDBAG MIN. LENGTH= 18" MIN. WIDTH= 12" MIN. THICKNESS=3" PLACE EVERY 6' TYP SANDBAG MIN. LENGTH= 18" MIN. WIDTH= 12" MIN. THICKNESS=3" PLACE EVERY 6' TYP FILTER SOCK WORK} AREA SECTION PROTECTED AREA .--+--r-----LIM ITS OF GRADING 6" MIN. OVERLAP WORK AREA RUNOFF FLOW FILTER SOCK OVERLAP �RUNOFF PROTECTEC AREA (_ SANDBAG SECURE EACH END � FWW !I 0�F=--=I;.;;;;;;;;;.L..;;;..;TE;;;;;;;;.;;R;;;....;;;....;S....;;;;...O....;;;;..C.;;;;;..;;;;K;....__ _______ _�J SCALE: NOT TO SCALE �o it1....-________________________ _ 3.1.5 Flora and Fauna Environmental Setting: Flora A biotic survey of the Property conducted on September 14, 2022, found no endangered or threatened species. Previous use of the Property has allowed non-native trees, shrubs, and grasses to populate the site. Typical vegetation found in the area includes Ironwood ( Casuarina equisetifolia), Kukui (Aleurites moluccana), Bingabing (Macaranga grandifolia) African tulip (Spathodea campanulate), Albizia (Facaltaria moluccana), Tropical ash (Fraxinus uhdei), Banyan (Ficus benghalensis ), Areca Palms (Areca catechu) and numerous common weedy shrubs, vines, and grasses. One native plant, Kauna'oa kahakai (Cuscuta sandwichiana), was detected on the Property, although it was not rooted in the ground. All the vegetation on the Property is common and not considered rare or endemic. Table 4 is a full list of flora found during the biotic survey. Table 4: Flora Found on the Subject Property Latin Name Common Name Family Status Falcataria moluccana Albizia Fabaceae A Commelina diffusa Honohono irrass Commelinaceae A Brachiara mutica California grass Poaceae A Clusia rosea Autoirraph tree Clusiaceae A Polystichum munitum Sword fem Dryopteridaceae A Macaran�a Bingabing Euphorbiaceae A Man�ifera indica Mango Anacardiaceae A Clidemia hirta Koster's curse Melastomataceae A Cecrovia obtusi{olia Trumpet tree Moraceae A Mimosa pudica Sensitive Grass Fabaceae A Chamaecrista fasciculata Partridge Pea Fabaceae A Momordica charantia Bitter Melon Cucurbitaceae A Passiflora edulis Lilikoi Passifloraceae A Me�athvrsus maximus Guinea Grass Poaceae A Euphorbia hirta Hairv Spurge Euphorbiaceae A Dracaena sanderiana Bamboo Poaceae A Ricinus communis Castor Bean Euphorbiaceae A Trema orientale Gunpowder Tree Cannabaceae A Dvvsis lutescens ArecaPalm Arecaceae A Evivremnum vinnatum Pothos Vine Araceae A Momordica charantia Bitter Melon Cucurbitaceae A Clusia rosea Autoirraph Tree Clusiaceae A Cenchrus clandestinus Kikuyu Grass Poaceae A Crotalaria sv. Rattlepod Fabaceae A 81 Impacts and Mitigating Measures Construction and operation activities will have little impact to native biological communities. The Property has been previously cleared, including most recently in April 2022 under a SMA Minor Permit approved by the Planning Department in January of 2021. There was one native plant detected known as Kauna'oa kahakai ( Cuscuta sandwichiana) although it was not rooted in the ground. Cuscuta sandwichiana is a parasitic vine and requires a host plant to survive. Since the proposed action will involve the use of screening landscaping, and there is potential for native endangered birds to be in the area, mitigating measures must be determined and adopted, if necessary. The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. Hoary Bats may be sensitive to disturbance between June 1st and September 15th, throughout which no shrubs or trees taller than 15 feet may be disturbed, removed, or trimmed without consulting the DLNR Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFA W). The State listed Hawaiian Hawk, or 'Io (Buteo solitarius) is also known to occur in the project vicinity. If any tree cutting occurs between March and September, DOF AW must be consulted first. A pre-construction hawk nest search by a qualified ornithologist using standard methods must be conducted. If nests are found, no land clearing is permissible until October. According to DOFAW, artificial lighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night by causing disorientation. The disorientation can result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds. For nighttime lighting that might be required, DOFAW recommends that all lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15th through December 15th. This is the period when young seabirds take their maiden voyage to the open ocean. The movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as fill, must be minimized. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens such as Rapid 'Qhi'a Death (ROD), vertebrate and invertebrate pests such as Little Fire Ants (Wasmannia auropunctata), or invasive plant parts that could harm native species and ecosystems. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil before leaving the site. Gear that may contain soil, such as work boots and vehicles, should be thoroughly cleaned, and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevent the spread of ROD and other harmful fungal pathogens. If any material removed from the site is moved to areas without fire ants or ROD, the material will be inspected and treated. No 'Ohi'a trees are present on the Property; therefore, none will be cut down during construction. 3.1.6 Air Quality, Noise, and Scenic Resources Environmental Setting The air quality in the vicinity of the Property is generally very good. Heavy vog is not usually a concern for this part of Hilo during past Knauea eruptions. V og is created when sulfur dioxide reacts chemically with sunlight, oxygen, dust particles, and water in the air. During eruptions, the trade winds generally keep the Hilo area free from severe conditions, however, weak winds, 83 particularly in the winter, may result in worse atmospheric quality. Air quality related to emissions is not an immediate concern since current Kilauea activity is minimal. Noise near the subject site is moderate. The area is urban and other businesses are present to the east and south. Manono Street is also located to the east, which generates moderate noise levels from vehicular traffic. The Afook-Chinen Civic Auditorium and the Francis Wong Stadium located to the northeast occasionally hold events and baseball games, which can also generate moderate noise. Goals and policies to preserve areas of natural beauty are outlined in the County ofHawai'i General Plan. These standards are designed to prevent encroachment on scenic features such as black sand beaches and tidal ponds. The Wailoa River State Park is located 625 feet to the west of the subject Property and is a significant scenic resource in the area. Impacts and Mitigating Measures Rules and regulations outlined in Hawai'i Administrative Rules Title 11, Chapter 46 "Community Noise Control," Chapter 59 "Ambient Air Quality," and Chapter 60.1 "Air Pollution," will be followed during all construction and operation activities. Air pollutants during construction will be limited and temporary. The main sources of short-term air pollutants are construction equipment exhaust and dust. HAR § 11-60 on Fugitive Dust prohibits visible emissions of dust from constriction activities. These regulations will be strictly followed to prevent dust impacts to Pi'ilani Street, Mililani Street, and Manono Street. In addition, reasonable measures to control airborne and visible fugitive dust from road areas are outlined by the Department of Health's Clean Air Branch. These measures include, but are not limited to: •Planning the different phases of construction, focusing on minimizing the amount ofairborne, visible fugitive dust-generating materials and activities, centralizing on-sitevehicular traffic routes, and locating potential dust-generating equipment in areas of the least impact.•Providing adequate water sources at the site prior to start-up of construction activities;Landscaping and providing rapid covering of bare areas, including slopes, starting fromthe initial grading phase.•Minimizing airborne, visible fugitive dust from shoulders, and access roads.•Providing reasonable dust control measures during weekends, after hours, and prior todaily start-up of construction activities.•Controlling airborne, visible fugitive dust from debris being hauled away from the project site. These mitigating measures will be used during construction to prevent significant impacts from dust to roadways in the area. 84 During operation, the main source of air pollution will be through regular vehicle trips including the movement of employees and customers. The TIAR estimates 108 vehicular trips during AM peak hours and 36 vehicular trips during PM peak hours. Idle emissions are not anticipated to produce adverse impacts due to the low number of anticipated trips and nature of building program. With higher EPA standards for vehicular air emissions, plus the need to comply with appropriate Department of Health Air Quality standards, the impact to the ambient air quality should not be significant. The subject Property is in an area with mixed zoning including Open, Commercial, and Residential. The Property itself is zoned Limited Industrial ML-20. According to Hawai'i Revised Statues Chapter 342F, Noise Pollution, Industrial areas allow noise levels to reach 70 decibels for both daytime (7 AM - 10 PM) and nighttime hours (10 PM - 7 AM). Commercial areas allow 60 and 50 decibels for daytime and nighttime hours, respectively, and Residential allows 55 and 45 decibels for daytime and nighttime hours, respectively. Noise generated by activities on site are not expected to exceed 70 decibels during daytime or nighttime hours. This includes noise generated onsite from the storage facility. The storage facility is proposed to be constructed with steel and insulated with Rl 9 on sidewalls and R30 on the ceiling to abate noise. This will largely mitigate noise emitted to nearby properties and Wailoa River State Park. Short-term noise impacts may occur during construction from excavation, grading, vehicle and equipment operation, and the construction of new infrastructure. Most of these impacts will be temporary and mitigated through Best Management Practices. It is possible that a noise permit may need to be sought if there is ever a potential for construction noise to exceed the Department of Health's maximum permissible noise levels. During operation, sources of noise may occur from regular vehicle and truck trips, customers, and warehouse activities. Most of these sources will be limited to typical workday hours. 85 The storage facility will operate under standard noise levels compared to similar establishments. Other mitigating measures can be applied to the proposed project if it is determined that a lower decibel maximum is appropriate for the area (for example, Commercial level standards). The County ofHawai'i General Plan outlines regulations to preserve areas of natural scenic beauty. No significant visual impacts would occur to scenic resources in the area. . Light pollution is another important aspect of maintaining scenic resources, the visibility of the night sky, and the protection of seabirds that may utilize resources near the subject Property. Therefore, the following guidelines to minimize light pollution will be adhered to: 1.Any outdoor lighting must conform to the standards established by the Hawai' i CountyOutdoor Lighting Ordinance (Hawai'i County Code Chapter 14, Article 9: "OutdoorLighting").2.The minimum possible amount of outdoor/exterior lighting should be used and should be turned off when not needed. Motion sensor activated lighting will be used wherever feasible. 3.All exterior lighting should be fully shielded. This means that all lighting fixtures mustemit zero light above the horizontal plane.4.Conformity to the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance also requires the use of blue-deficientexterior lighting. This means that exterior LED lighting must emit less than 2% of its total energy at wavelengths less than 500 nm. The best choice for this is either filtered LED lights, or amber LED lights.5.White light should be avoided. Any white light used should have Correlated ColorTemperature of2700 Kor below. 3.1.7 Hazardous Substances, Toxic Waste, and Hazardous Conditions Environmental Setting: Historical Use Waiakea Fishpond has historically been polluted by both point and non-point sources of arsenic pollution. A former canec plant once operated on the southeast comer of Waiakea Fishpond from 1932 to 1963. Canec board was made from pressed sugarcane fiber and widely used for walls and ceilings of buildings. Arsenic was added to canec boards to deter termites and prevent damage. Approximately 500 tons of arsenic compounds were released into Waiakea Fishpond from the former plant's sewer line over its 30 years of operation. Arsenic based herbicides and 86 pesticides were also widely used throughout the copious sugarcane fields in the Hilo area. Erosion and runoff of soil from former sugar cane fields in upland areas likely also contributed to arsenic present in the pond sediment today (DOH, 2019). Arsenic contamination largely remains within sediment found at the bottom of the pond; however, it is possible historical tsunamis spread contaminated sediment to nearby properties. Therefore, an Environmental Site Assessment was conducted in 2018 to determine whether any current or past hazardous substances are present on the site. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted on the subject Property in March 2018 by Lehua Environmental Inc. in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. The assessment was conducted to evaluate existing conditions, investigate the environmental history, and identify the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC's) within and around the site. According to the report, a current REC is defined as: "The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat to a future release to the environment." (ASTM, 2013). In contrast, a past REC is defined as: "A past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted residential use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls" (ASTM, 2013). Research for this study consisted of a review of historical and regulatory records, present conditions, site geology and hydrogeology, Federal, State, and local databases of known or potentially hazardous waste sites, landfills, and sites currently under investigation for environmental violations. According to the report, the assessment revealed no evidence of past or current RECs in connection with the site and thus confirmed that a Phase II study was not necessary. The full ESA report can be found in Appendix A. Impacts and Mitigating Measures The Environmental Site Assessment found no evidence of past or current RECs, which means any potential contamination from past tsunami events or former land use that impacted the property is no longer detectable. 87 Environmental Setting: Proposed Use No hazardous materials will be used throughout the construction process that has the potential to contaminate any surface or ground water resources. No hazardous waste is anticipated to be produced from the proposed action. The quantity of solid waste that the proposed development will produce is unknown. Services to dispose of waste will be contracted through local waste management companies. A solid waste management plan will be developed if required by the Department of Environmental Management prior to completion and operation of the project. During operation, petroleum products may be used for onsite machinery and equipment or landscape maintenance. Impacts and Mitigating Measures Solid waste generated by the development will require private disposal at the Hilo landfill or other designated landfill sites as required by the County. Following the guidelines of State and County requirements to minimize the possibility for spills and hazardous materials during construction, the applicant proposes the following: •Construction activities with the potential to produce polluted runoff will be limited toperiods of low rainfall•During construction, emergency spill treatment, storage, and disposal of all hazardous materials, will be explicitly required to meet all State and County requirements, and the contractor will adhere to "Good Housekeeping" for all appropriate substances, with the following instructions:o Onsite storage to minimum practical quantity of hazardous materials necessary tocomplete the job;o Fuel storage and use will be conducted to prevent leaks, spills or fires; o Products will be kept in their original containers unless un-resealable, and original labels and safety data will be retainedoDisposal of surplus will follow manufacturer's recommendation and allregulations; o Manufacturers' instructions for proper use and disposal will be strictly followed; o Regular inspection by contractor to ensure proper use and disposal; o Onsite vehicles and machinery will be monitored for leaks and receive regularmaintenance;o Construction materials, petroleum products, wastes, debris, and landscaping substances (herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers) will be prevented from blowing, falling, flowing, washing or leaching into the ocean; and 88 o All spills will be cleaned up and properly disposed of immediately afterdiscovery.•Unused materials and excess fill (if any) will be properly disposed of at an authorizedwaste disposal site. Petroleum products can be considered hazardous if not handled or stored properly. All petroleum products will be stored and will be managed by qualified personnel. Personnel who have completed the proper education and training will be the only qualified individuals to handle such products, which will only be used according to the original label on the container. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) must be made readily available and visible within the maintenance building. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) will be used at all times and checked regularly. If at any time, hazardous substances or waste are discovered on the Property during construction, all work will cease, and appropriate authorities will be contacted. A remediation specialist can be contacted to supervise the appropriate disposal and management of substances, if deemed necessary. Hawaiian Kingdom Brands will require all users and occupants of the proposed facilities to follow all government regulations pertaining to hazardous and toxic substances. 3.2 Socioeconomic and Cultural 3.2.1 Land Use, Socioeconomic Characteristics, and Recreation Environmental Setting The subject property is zoned Limited Industrial ML-20. The parcel is bordered by Pi'ilani Street to the south and by vacant land to the north, east, and west. Properties further to the north, east and west are Resort-Hotel 750 square feet (V.75), and properties located further south are zoned General Commercial 7,500 square feet (CG 7.5). Open zoning is present on the east side ofManono street where the Afook-Chinen Civic Center lies. Other surrounding land uses vary and include: •The Hilo marina is located roughly 1,300 feet to the north•Ho'olulu Park is located to the northeast/east, which hosts the Walter Victor BaseballComplex, Francis Wong Stadium, and the Afook-Chinen Civic Center (roughly 800,950 and 450 feet from the subject Property)•The Manono mini mart convenience store and Luquin's restaurant are locatedapproximately 130 feet to the south•Hooganji Buddhist mission is roughly 450 feet to the south•Wailoa Plaza and Waiakea Villas residential complex are located roughly 1,000 feet tothe southwest The nearest point of the Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond is approximately 625 feet to the west. The mouth of the Wailoa River where it enters Hilo Bay is approximately 2,300 feet to the north. 89 Impacts and Mitigation Measures No significant impacts are anticipated to land use, socioeconomic characteristics, or recreation. Recreation in Wailoa River State Park will not be impacted during construction or operation. The proposed project will be a convenient resource for local residents. 3.2.2 Cultural and Historic Resources Environmental Setting: Cultural Background Hawai'i is believed to be first inhabited by voyagers from the Marquesas around 1,000 A.D, however, recent studies have shown that initial Polynesian colonization ofHawai'i Island occurred between 1220 and 1261 A.D. Early Hawaiian settlements incorporated new strategies and structures to adapt to their new environment. Traditional Polynesian philosophies and ideals were used to form new societal standards and structures including the principle of genealogical seniority, observance of gods such as Kane, Ku, and Lano, the kapu system of law and order, ahupua 'a land systems, and various beliefs and values that determined day-to-day protocol and lifestyle such as mana and the 'aumakua. It is believed that Hilo is likely one of the first settlements on Hawai'i Island. Hilo is known to have rich marine resources accessed at Hilo Bay and additional abundant resources from the forests that descend from Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea. Ancient Hawaiians understood the critical importance of fresh water. Fresh water streams and springs were believed to be created by the gods Kane and Kanaloa, which established a spiritual connection between people and water. In accordance with the native Hawaiians respect for water, land management units were organized around freshwater supplies in a traditional system known as the ahupua 'a resource-management system (CWRM, 2019). According to the Water Resource Protection Plan, "water was viewed as such a critical resource to the health and well-bring of the people of ancient Hawai'i, that the concept of private ownership did not exist" (CWRM, 2019). The ahupua 'a system, divided near the end of the 16th century, or early 17th century, was designed to provide all the necessary resources to live including agricultural resources inland and ocean resources at the coast. These ahupua 'a in the Hilo region include Pu'u'eo, Pi'ihonua, Punahoa, Ponahawai Kiikiiau and Waiakea (where the property is located). Waiakea ahupua 'a is one of the largest in the district, covering over 95,000 acres and provided resources stretching from the sea up to 6,000 feet along the slopes ofMauna Kea (Kelly, 1981). Waiakea translates to "broad waters" and includes the Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond, Reeds Bay, Kiihio Bay and Puhi Bay (Pukui et al. 1976). Hawaiian traditional accounts attest to the longstanding importance of W aiakea. Marine subsistence was a significant part of traditional culture and social organization. Fishponds were 90 developed in the vicinity of Hilo Bay, including royal fishponds, which were spring-fed inland ponds reserved for the highest ali 'i and religious rituals. According to Haun & Associates (2018), "The chief of the Hilo region, Kulukulu' a, who resided in W aiakea, was the first conquest of 'Umi-a-Liloa in his campaign to unify the districts of Hawai'i Island." The largest known royal fishpond is the Waiakea Fishpond located roughly 625 feet east of the subject Property. A dedicated fishing ground or ko 'a known as Maka-o-kii was located near present day Coconut Island, roughly 0.75 miles northeast of the subject site. Strict kapu were enforced throughout the Waiakea region, which dictated when and where certain varieties of fish could be caught (Kelly et al. 1981). Farming was also essential to the residents of Waiakea through the cultivation of wet and dry taro (Maly 1996; Handy and Handy 1972). Today, there has been a resurgence in traditional uses of water resources, which often rely on surface water sources and coastal springs for traditional and customary practices and subsistence activities (CWRM, 2019). Environmental Setting: Historical Background The earliest documentation of Hilo is found in 'Umi-a-Liloa's conquest ofHawai'i Island in the sixteenth century, which established Hilo as a royal center for the island. In the account, 'Umi-aLiloa began his conquest of the Island ofHawai'i by defeating chiefKulukulu'a, who lived in Waiakea, and the other chiefs of Hilo. 'Umi-a-Liloa's son Keawe-nui-a-'Umi ruled Hamakua, Hilo and Puna. After the death of Keawe-nui-a-'Umi, the ruling kingdom was divided into three parts and was established under warring chiefs (Kamakau, 1992). In 1738 Kamehameha I was born. ChiefKalani'opu'u was the high chief during Cook's arrival in 1778. After the chiefs death in 1782, his son Kiwala'o, and his nephew, Kamehameha I began to compete for control of the west side ofHawai'i Island. Kamehameha won the battle of Moku'ohai against Kiwala'o in Kona, officially controlling the western half of the island. In 1791, Kamehameha, having gained control of Hilo, fought, and won a battle against his cousin Keoua at Kawaihae for control of the entire Island ofHawai'i. At this time, fur traders and other seamen began to come to the islands. By 1791, the exploitation of sandalwood began and Hilo' s reputation as a significant port emerged. A few years later, in 1795, Kamehameha conquered Maui, Moloka'i, Lana'i and O'ahu. He also received Kaua'i by cession in 1810 (Kamakau, 1992). Kamehameha's son Liholiho was born in Hilo in November 1797. Waiakea was inherited by Lihiliho after Kamehameha's death. The 'iii kupono of Pi'opi'o and its royal fishpond were given to his favorite wife, Ka' ahumanu. At the end of the sandalwood era, Christian missionaries led by William Ellis, arrived at the islands. In 1824, a missionary station was established at the mouth of Wailoa River in Waiakea. By 1837, two-thirds of the population relocated to Hilo from villages outside of the area. The mission eventually moved to the top of Haili Street from Waiakea, which established the present location of Hilo. In 1839, King Kamehameha III signed the Bill of Rights, which sought to ensure that the people's land would not be taken from them. In 1840, the first Constitution ofHawai'i was enacted. In 1845, the Land Commission was created by Kamehameha III to award land claims, 91 with traditional and customary rights is discovered on the site, work will cease immediately, and the State Historic Preservation Division will be contacted for appropriate action. Figure 48: 1965 USDA Aerial Photo of the Subject Property Figure 49: 1977 USDA Aerial Photo of the Subject Property 93 3.3 Public Roads, Services, and Utilities 3.3.1 Roads and Access Environmental Setting The subject site is located on an undeveloped lot on the northeast comer of Pi'ilani Street and Mililani Street intersection. Mililani street is undeveloped north of the Pi'ilani Street, therefore current access is solely off Pi'ilani Street. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) was completed on July 6, 2022, by SSFM International to evaluate potential traffic impacts from the proposed project. The TIAR analyzed five (5) main characteristics of potential traffic outcomes with and without the project, based on existing conditions (2022) and future year projections in five (5), ten (10) and twenty (20) year intervals. These include: •Existing operating conditions with AM and PM peak traffic hours.•Traffic projections for Future Without Project in 2027, 2032, and 2042.•Estimated vehicular trips that will be generated by the project.•Traffic projections for Future With Project in 2027, 2032 and 2042.•Recommendations for roadway improvements or other mitigating measures, asappropriate, to reduce or eliminate any adverse impacts resulting from traffic generatedby the project. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition, was used for calculating Levels of Service (LOS), volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios, and delays using the traffic analysis software "Synchro." According to the report, Levels of Service is a quantitative measure used to describe the conditions of traffic flow at intersections, with values ranging from free-flow conditions at LOS A, with little to no delays, to congested conditions at LOS F, where extreme delays exist. Traffic operations and impacts were analyzed during AM and PM peak hours at five ( 5) intersections within the subject area (Figure 50): 1.Hawai'i Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 2.Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street3.Hawai'i Route 11 and Pi'ilani Street4.Manono Street and Kekuanao'a Street5.Mililani Street and Kekuanao'a Street 94 legffld Study Intersections -HOOT Traffic Count Station Str t Pro«I Ar Figure 50: TIAR Study Intersections 95 Hawai'i Route 19 and 11 are State-owned highways. Manono Street, Pi'ilani Street, Kekiianao'a Street, and Mililani Street are all County-owned roadways. These intersections were chosen by identifying significant intersections, which may be impacted by project related trips, which would add 3 percent or greater traffic to their forecasted volumes, per the Hawai'i Department of Transportation (HDOT) standard practices. Vehicle turning movement counts were taken at the five study intersections on Wednesday, April 6, 2022, from 6:30-9:30 AM, and 3:00-6:00 PM. The AM and PM peak traffic hours occurred between 7:30-8:30 AM and 3:45-4:45 PM. Pedestrian and bicycle crossings were also studied at each intersection during the same AM and PM peak hours. Manono Street/Lihiwai Street has the highest amount of pedestrian activity, with up to six (6) peak hour pedestrian crossings during the PM hours. Hawai'i Route 11 and Pi'ilani Street had the highest bicycle activity, with six (6) peak hour bicycle movements during the PM hours (Table 5). Table 5: Peak Hour Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Pedestrian Bicyle Intersection AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 2 Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street 2 Manono Street & Piilani Street 1 Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 1 Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street 5 Existing Intersection LOS Analysis 1.Hawai'i Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 6 1 1 0 1 6 4 2 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 •This signalized intersection has an appropriate LOS D or better and v/c of <1.0during AM and PM peak hours.2.Hawai'i Route 11 and Pi'ilani Street•All movements at this unsignalized Two-Way Stop Controlled (TWSC)intersection resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c <1.0 during AM andPM peak hours.3.Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street•All movements at this unsignalized TWSC intersection resulted in appropriateLOS C or better and v/c <1.0 during AM and PM peak hours.4.Manono Street and Kekuanao'a Street•All movements at this signalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS C orbetter and v/c <1.0 during AM and PM peak hours. 5.Mililani Street and Kekuanao'a Street•All movements at this unsignalized TWSC intersection resulted in appropriateLOS C or better and v/c <1.0 during AM and PM peak hours. Table 6 below shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection (2022). 96 Table 6: Existing (2022) Level of Service AM PM Intersection Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 19.4 -B 23.2 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 12.5 0.27 B 15.1 0.27 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 15.1 0.35 B 19.5 0.44 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 18.0 0.48 B 26.7 0.68 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Left 11.6 0.16 B 14.8 0.22 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 17.6 0.52 B 20.3 0.48 C Hawaii Route 19WB Right 12.8 0.02 B 15.8 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 26.0 0.60 C 27.0 0.71 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.5 0.37 C 22.3 0.23 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.0 0.08 C 27.7 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 35.0 0.74 D 37.5 0.76 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized {TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 19.3 0.50 C 19.9 0.37 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - --- - Hawaii Route 11 SB Th rough-Right ------ Piilani Street EB Left-Right 20.2 0.23 C 20.8 0.39 C Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.01 A 8.2 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 21.6 0.16 C 22.6 0.20 C Pi ilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 17.2 0.35 C 20.9 0.41 C Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 29.2 -C 29.0 -C Manono Street NB Left 21.8 0.25 C 21.0 0.16 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 32.3 0.64 C 28.6 0.51 C Manono Street SB Left 22.7 0.28 C 21.5 0.26 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 30.0 0.56 C 32.5 0.65 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 22.6 0.35 C 20.5 0.31 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Throu h-Ri ht 25.8 0.52 C 32.0 0.72 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Left Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 0.15 U.B o.u B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 8.8 0.02 A 8.4 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.01 A 8.6 0.00 A Future Without Project Conditions A.Upcoming Planned Projects Island Naturals Properties, LLC was granted a Special Management Area (SMA) Use Permit (No. 21-000079) to construct a 67,685 square foot retail and office complex on theNorthwest comer ofMililani Street and Kekuanao'a Street, roughly 0.25 miles south ofthe subject site. This development is expected to include a one-stop commercial retail andoffice center, including relocating the current Island Naturals grocery store. Full buildoutis expected by 2026. 97 No TIAR was conducted for the SMA application. However, the background report estimates that the development will generate at least 50 vehicular trips during peak hours. The background report also discusses implementing two (2) full movement access driveways, one offMililani Street, and one off Hualani Street, with the belief that dividing left-tum movements between these side-streets will help reduce congestion. In addition, the developer is suggesting the inclusion of two right-in, right-out driveways off Kekiianao'a Street to minimize or eliminate the backup of traffic on Kekiianao'a Street. In response, the County ofHawai'i Department of Public Works has recommended a left turn lane in the eastbound direction be installed at the intersection of Kekuanao'a Street and Mililani Street; however, it is unclear if this will be implemented. According to SSFM, the proposed land uses outlined in the Island Naturals SMA application are estimated to generate 282 additional AM peak hour trips and 486 additional PM peak hour trips, as shown in Table 7. The SMA application estimates the total number of peak hour trips to be much lower due to unspecified trip reduction factors. It is worth noting that the current location of the grocery store already generates many of these trips in the surrounding road network, so the overall trip generation from the development may be limited to the other planned developments in the proposed complex. Even without the trips from the grocery store, the total number of AM and PM peak hour trips is expected to be 208 and 226 vehicles, respectively. It is important to note that the anticipated trip generation for the Hawaiian Kingdom Brands proposed action is projected to be significantly lower than the unadjusted trip generation for the Island Naturals development. Table 7: Estimated Vehicular Trips to be Generated by the Island Naturals Complex Phase/Land Use Area (1000 SF) ITE Land Use In AM Peak Hour Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total Phase 1 Island Naturals Store 26.0 850 • Suoermarket 44 30 74 130 130 260 Office Space 8.9 710-General Office BuildinR 18 3 21 4 18 22 Total: 62 33 95 134 148 282 Phase 2 Drive-Through Restaurant 3.0 934 - Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through 68 66 134 52 47 99 Total: 68 66 134 52 47 99 Phase 3 Retail Space 10.3 822 -Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 18 11 29 40 40 80 Office Space 10.3 710-General Office BuildinR 21 3 24 4 21 25 Tata/: 39 14 53 44 61 105 Io.till Qf All etme5; 169 113 282 230 256 486 B.Background Growth The Statewide Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the State ofHawai'i forecasts an annual increase in traffic volume of 1.28 percent between 2007 and 2035 in South Hilo. Historical HDOT traffic volumes along Manono Street varied between 2013- 2022. Recorded traffic counts in 2013 along Manono Street were 10,723. Compared to pre-pandemic volumes in 2019, which were slightly lower at 10,320. Figure 51 below shows a 1.28 percent growth rate applied to high-volume regional traffic movements (identified with red arrows). 98 Lihiwai Street 1 \_ ) i \. - { _/ s \i( -' " �l"-. ,7 -----1u----Lr �ir \ -.- ,J _._ -�ir \ Legend # Analyzed Intersection (';\ Signalized\.V Intersection Hawaii Route 11 J l \. \_ { s _/ \i(-----. Unsignalized Intersection , Stop Sign Figure 51: Study Intersection Regional Traffic Volume Movements 99 C.Future 2027, 2032 and 2042 Without Project Peak Hour Conditions and LOS at EachStudy Intersection (Figures 52-54 and Tables 8-10) 1.Hawai'i Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street All movements at the signalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS D orbetter and v/c <1.0 during AM and PM peak hours in 2027, 2032 and 2042. 2.Hawai'i Route 11 and Pi'ilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS C orbetter and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2027 and 2032. In 2042, all movements resulted in LOS D and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. 3.Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS C orbetter and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2027, and LOS D andv/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2032 and 2042. 4.Manono Street and Kekiianao'a Street All movements at the signalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS D orbetter and v/c <1.0 during AM and PM peak hours in 2027 and 2032. In 2042, the Eastbound through-right land resulted in poor LOS E conditionsduring PM peak hours with a v/c ratio of 0.97. All other movements at the intersection resulted in LOS D or better and v/c <1.0 during AM and PM peakhours. 5.Mililani Street and Kekuanao'a Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours and LOS D or better andv/c <1.0 in 2032 and 2042. 100 88 (96) 501 (613] 309 (415) Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection @ Unsignallzed Intersection , Stop Sign XX [XX] Figure 52: 2027 Future Without Project Peak Hour Volumes Peak Hour Volumes AM(PM] (veh/hour) 101 Table 8: 2027 Future LOS Conditions Witho�t Project AM PM Intersection Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c (sec/veh) (sec/veh} LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 20.2 -C 24.0 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 13.2 0.28 B 15.5 0.29 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 15.8 0.38 B 20.2 0.47 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 19.1 0.52 B 29.0 0.72 C Hawaii Route 19WB Left 12.1 0.17 B 15.2 0.23 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 18.7 0.56 B 21.1 0.51 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Right 13.2 0.02 B 16.0 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 26.6 0.62 C 27.8 0.73 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.4 0.36 C 22.2 0.22 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.8 0.08 C 27.9 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.0 0.74 D 37.8 0.77 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized {TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 20.8 0.52 C 21.7 0.40 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through Hawaii Route llSB Ri ht Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.01 A 8.2 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 22.8 0.16 C 24.0 0.22 C Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 18.1 0.37 C 22.3 0.43 C Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 31.1 -C 31.3 -C Manono Street NB Left 21.3 0.25 C 19.8 0.15 B Manono Street NB Through-Right 31.8 0.65 C 26.9 0.50 C Manono Street SB Left 22.1 0.28 C 20.1 0.25 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 29.6 0.58 C 30.8 0.65 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 25.1 0.39 C 23.1 0.36 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 28.0 0.58 C 40.1 0.83 D Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.1 0.08 B 25.8 0.40 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 38.7 0.83 D 31.9 0.68 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized {TWSC} Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 24.0 0.15 C 16.9 0.08 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 18.3 0.16 C 13.1 0.12 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 8.9 0.02 A 8.5 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.01 A 8.7 0.00 A 102 Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signahzed Intersection Unsignalized Intersection � Stop Sign XX [XX] Figure 53: 2032 Future Without Project Peak Hour Volumes Peak Hour Volumes AM(PM] (veh/hour) 103 Table 9: 2032 Future LOS Conditions \\;itho�t Project AM PM Intersection Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh} (sec/veh} Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Uhiwai Street 20.6 .C 25.2 .C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 13.6 0.30 B 16.2 0.30 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 16.1 0.40 B 21.1 0.51 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 19.9 0.55 B 32.4 0.78 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Left 12.2 0.18 B 15.9 0.24 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 19.3 0.60 B 22.1 0.55 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Right 13.2 0.02 B 16.4 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 28.3 0.67 C 27.6 0.74 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.4 0.36 C 21.9 0.22 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.8 0.08 C 28.3 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.0 0.74 D 38.3 0.77 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC} Unsignalized (TWSC} Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 22.6 0.55 C 24.0 0.43 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through .... .. Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right . .. ... Piilani Street EB Left-Right 23.8 0.27 C 24.9 0.45 C Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC} Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.2 O.Ql A 8.3 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.2 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 24.3 0.18 C 25.6 0.23 D Piilani StreetWB Left-Through-Right 19.1 0.38 C 24.0 0.46 C Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 33.2 .C 33.0 .C Manono Street NB Left 21.7 0.27 C 21.1 0.17 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 33.1 0.69 C 28.6 0.54 C Manono Street SB Left 22.6 0.29 C 21.2 0.26 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 30.7 0.62 C 34.2 0.72 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 26.9 0.43 C 22.8 0.36 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 29.3 0.63 C 42.2 0.86 D Ke kuanaoa Street WB Left 18.5 0.09 B 26.5 0.42 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 43.1 0.87 D 31.7 0.70 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC} Unsignalized (TWSC} Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 26.0 0.16 D 17.9 0.09 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 19.4 0.17 C 13.5 0.12 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.0 0.02 A 8.6 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.4 0.01 A 8.8 0.00 A 104 Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection , Stop Sign XX [XX] Figure 54: 2042 Future Without Project Peak Hour Volumes Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) 105 Table 10: 2042 Future LOS Conditions Without Project AM PM Intersection Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 23.3 -C 28.7 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 16.2 0.36 B 17.7 0.35 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 18.6 0.47 B 23.2 0.58 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 24.3 0.65 C 43.5 0.89 D Hawaii Route 19 WB Left 13.9 0.20 B 17.2 0.28 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 23.2 0.71 C 24.5 0.63 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Right 14.6 0.02 B 17.2 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 27.7 0.68 C 29.6 0.78 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 24.4 0.32 C 21.9 0.21 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 28.1 0.09 C 29.5 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 37.8 0.75 D 40.1 0.78 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 28.3 0.63 D 30.8 0.Sl D Hawaii Route 11 NB Through ------ Hawai I Route 11 SB Through-Right - ----- Piilani Street EB Left-Right 30.7 0.34 D 32.7 0.54 D Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.4 0.01 A 8.5 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.05 A 8.4 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 28.1 0.20 D 30.9 0.27 D Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 21.9 0.43 C 29.7 0.53 D Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 39.3 -D 40.4 -D Manono Street NB Left 23.9 0.31 C 23.4 0.21 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 39.1 0.79 D 31.5 0.62 C Manono Street SB Left 25.1 0.34 C 22.7 0.30 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 35.7 0.73 D 43.6 0.85 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 30.7 0.50 C 23.6 0.39 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 31.3 0.71 C 56.7 0.97 E Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.7 0.10 B 31.6 0.52 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 53.9 0.96 D 33.6 0.76 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 32.2 0.20 D 20.4 0.11 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 22.5 0.20 C 14.5 0.14 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.3 0.02 A 8.7 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.6 0.01 A 9.1 0.01 A 106 Future With Project Conditions A.Project Related Volumes The number of trips generated for the proposed project was determined using trip generation, trip distribution, modal choice, and route assignment. B.Trip Generation and Distribution Trip generation was calculated using rates from Trip Generation, 11th Edition(International Transportation of Engineers, 2021) appropriate for manufacturing and fastfood restaurants with a drive through window. Table 11 outlines the projected tripsgenerated from the proposed project. 2024 Fast-Food Restaurant with 934 1.8 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Drive-Through Window 41 39 80 30 29 59 Trip Reduction (Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window) -16 -16 -32 Totals 62 46 108 17 19 Total vehicular trips expected to be generated during AM and PM peak hours are 108 and 36, respectively. Additionally, the project related trips were distributed along the four (4) primary roadways in the surrounding area, including Hawai'i Route 19 and 11, Kekiianao'a Street, and Manono Street. This distribution was based on data from the 2018 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) for Hawai'i Roads (Table 12). This data was chosen to reflect pre-Covid traffic patterns. Table 12: 2018 HPMS Surrounding Roadway Volumes HPMS 2018 G/5 Hawaii Route 19 {at Manono) 16,800 25% Hawaii Route 11 (at Piilani) 24,900 38% Kekuanaoa Street {at Mililani and Kekuanaoa) 13,700 21% Manono Street {at Kekuanaoa) 10,300 16% Total 65,700 100% *Source: 2018 Highway Performance Monitoring System Roads for Hawaii GIS Database 36 107 C.Future 2027, 2032 and 2042 With Project Peak Hour Conditions and LOS at Each StudyIntersection (Figures 55-57 and Tables 13-15) 1.Hawai'i Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS D orbetter and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2027, 2032 and 2042. 2.Hawai'i Route 11 and Pi'ilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS D orbetter and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2027 and 2032. In 2042, the Eastbound left-right lane will operate poorly at LOS E during the AM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.51 ). All other movements at this intersectionresulted in appropriate LOS D or better and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peakhours in 2042. 3.Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS D or better and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2027. In 2032, the Eastbound left-through-right lane will operate poorly at LOSEduring the AM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.46). All other movements at thisintersection resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c <1.0 during the AMand PM peak hours in 2042. 4.Manono Street and Kekiianao'a Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS D orbetter and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2027 and 2032. In 2042, the Southbound left-through-right lane will operate poorly at LOSE during the AM and PM peak hours (v/c ratio of 0.89 and 0.94, respectively). Allother movements at this intersection resulted in appropriate LOS C or better andv/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2042. 5.Mililani Street and Kekuanao'a Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection resulted in appropriate LOS D orbetter and v/c <1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours in 2027, 2032, and 2042. 108 Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection IV ... IV 80 00 ;::;-� W 00 ...... -� 96 (108) 294 (420) 32 (61) , Stop Sign XX[XX) Figure 55: 2027 Future with Project Peak Hour Volumes Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM) (veh/hour)109 AM PM Intersection Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 20.4 C 24.3 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 13.2 0.28 B 15.7 0.29 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 15.9 0.38 B 20.5 0.47 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 19.7 0.54 B 29.8 0.74 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Left 12.1 0.18 B 15.5 0.23 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 18.7 0.56 B 21.4 0.51 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Right 13.2 0.02 B 16.2 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 27.6 0.65 C 27.1 0.73 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.5 0.37 C 22.1 0.22 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.8 0.08 C 28.1 0.08 C Uhiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.0 0.74 D 38.1 0.77 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 22.6 0.57 C 22.2 0.41 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through Manono Street SB Left-Th 8.1 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piil i r 2. . 2 Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 26.5 0.53 25.5 0.49 D Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 32.0 C 31.4 C Mano no Street NB Left 20.7 0.25 C 19.9 0.15 B Manono Street NB Through-Right 30.9 0.65 C 27.0 0.50 C Manono Street SB Left 21.5 0.27 C 20.1 0.25 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 29.0 0.58 C 31.1 0.66 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 27.5 0.44 C 23.2 0.37 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 29.3 0.60 C 40.1 0.83 D Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.8 0.08 B 25.8 0.40 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 42.0 0.85 D 31.9 0.68 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 25.4 0.15 D 17.0 0.09 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 18.5 0.18 C 13.2 0.13 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.0 0.03 A 8.5 0.02 Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.4 0.01 8.7 0.00 A 24 (20] 456 (613] 5 (16] Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection 13 [8] 67 (116] Unsignalized Intersection "' .....,o0...,�.... ... -w 00 .. "' -� , Stop Sign XX[XX) Figure 56: 2032 Future With Project Peak Hour Volumes Peak Hour Volumes AM [PM) (veh/hour) 111 Table 14: 2032 Future LOS Conditions W!th Pr�ject AM PM Intersection Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 21.3 -C 25.4 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 14.1 0.31 B 16.4 0.31 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 16.8 0.41 B 21.4 0.51 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 21.2 0.58 C 33.3 0.79 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Left 12.7 0.19 B 16.0 0.25 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 20.0 0.61 B 22.3 0.55 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Right 13.7 0.02 B 16.6 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 27.8 0.66 C 27.5 0.75 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.1 0.35 C 21.9 0.22 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 27.3 0.08 C 28.4 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.6 0.75 D 38.6 0.77 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 25.0 0.61 D 24.6 0.45 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through ---- -- Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - - --- Piilani Street EB Left-Right 30.2 0.40 D 25.9 0.48 D Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.03 A 8.3 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.2 0.05 A 8.2 O.Q7 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 36.3 0.46 E 29.8 0.34 D Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 29.3 0.57 D 27.7 0.51 D Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 33.7 -C 33.2 -C Manono Street NB Left 22.1 0.27 C 21.2 0.17 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 33.9 0.71 C 28.7 0.55 C Manono Street SB Left 23.0 0.30 C 21.2 0.27 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 31.6 0.65 C 34.7 0.73 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 28.0 0.46 C 22.9 0.37 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 29.3 0.63 C 42.4 0.87 D Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.5 0.09 B 26.5 0.42 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 43.4 0.88 D 31.8 0.70 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 27.9 0.17 D 18.0 0.09 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 19.7 0.19 C 13.6 0.13 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.1 0.03 A 8.6 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.5 0.01 A 8.9 0.00 A 112 88 [96) 606 [742) 387 [SOS) Legend # Analyzed lntersecUon :,00 C: >----,�-e-• iii 0 .... \0 Signalized Intersection @ ;::: N _.... 0 .... -r--o ,... in in 00 Unslgnalized Intersection N ,_. NN 0N _o ,..._"' IJ) ,. 00 -.:::! � Stop Sign XX[XX] Figure 57: 2042 Future With Project Peak Hour Volumes Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) 113 Table 15: 2042 Future LOS Conditions With P�oject AM PM Intersection Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 23.6 -C 29.1 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 16.3 0.36 B 17.9 0.35 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 18.7 0.48 B 23.5 0.58 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 25.3 0.68 C 45.1 0.90 D Hawaii Route 19 WB Left 14.0 0.21 B 17.4 0.28 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 23.3 0.71 C 24.7 0.63 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Right 14.7 0.02 B 17.4 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 28.7 0.70 C 29.4 0.78 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 24.4 0.33 C 21.9 0.21 C Li hiwai Street SB Left 28.1 0.09 C 29.7 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 37.8 0.75 D 40.3 0.78 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 32.3 0.69 D 31.7 0.53 D Hawaii Route 11 NB Throul!h ---- Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right ------ Piilani Street EB Left-Right 44.2 0.51 E 34.7 0.57 D Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (AWSC) Unsignalized (AWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 20.8 0.69 C 19.5 0.67 C Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 39.8 0.89 E 43.6 0.94 E Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 12.3 0.20 B 11.4 0.15 B Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 13.6 0.36 B 12.5 0.30 B Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 36.6 -D 34.4 -C Manono Street NB Left 24.4 0.32 C 23.6 0.21 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 40.9 0.81 D 31.7 0.63 C Manono Street SB Left 25.7 0.35 C 22.8 0.30 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 37.0 0.75 D 44.8 0.86 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 29.1 0.49 C 22.2 0.37 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through 29.1 0.65 C 40.2 0.86 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Right 19.3 0.06 B 19.9 0.11 B Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.1 0.09 B 25.9 0.42 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through 45.7 0.91 D 30.4 0.69 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Ri ht Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 34.7 0.21 D 20.6 0.11 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 22.9 0.22 C 14.5 0.14 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.4 0.03 A 8.8 0.02 A u a S r -Th - i h 0.0 9. 114 Impacts and Mitigating Measures The TIAR has three (3) main recommendations to mitigate traffic in the future with the proposed project based on projected traffic increases in 2032 and 2042. Future 2032 With Project conditions suggest that the eastbound left-through-right lane at Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street will operate at LOSE during the AM peak hour, with a v/c ratio of 0.46. A traffic signal was analyzed at this intersection but did not pass the minimum volume thresholds outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Alternatively, an All-Way Stop Control would result in acceptable LOS for all intersection movements during AM and PM peak hours. It is therefore recommended that an A WSC be constructed at the intersection of Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street by 2032. Future 2042 With Project conditions suggest that southbound left-through-right lane at Manono Street and Pi'ilani Street will operate at LOSE during the AM and PM peak hours, with a v/c ratio of 0.89 and 0.94, respectively. This projection is likely even if an A WSC is constructed in 2032. A traffic signal alternative was analyzed but did not pass the minimum MUTCD volume thresholds. Alternatively, a mini-roundabout could be considered at this intersection. A mini round about would have similar features to a standard roundabout in terms of efficiency, safety, and traffic calming, but could be implemented at a smaller intersection such as this one. However, peak hour volumes at this intersection in Future 2042 With Project conditions fall well below the FHW A capacity to merit a mini-roundabout. It is therefore recommended that this intersection is monitored in the future to determine the appropriate mitigating measures. Future 2042 With Project conditions suggest that the eastbound left-right at Hawai'i Route 11 and Pi'ilani Street will operate at LOSE during the AM peak hour, with a v/c ratio of 0.51. However, the TIAR notes that all mainline movements along Hawai' i Route 11 will operate at appropriate LOS. Since the eastbound volume at the intersection is low, and the eastbound-leftright is not currently approaching capacity, no mitigation is recommended at this time. 3.3.2 Public Utilities and Services Environmental Setting: Water County water is available to the site via an existing six (6) inch waterline within Pi'ilani Street fronting the subject Property. The parcel is served by an existing 5/8-inch meter, which allows a maximum daily usage of 600 gallons. According to the Department of Water Supply (DWS), the existing six (6) inch waterline fronting Pi'ilani Street, and the existing eight (8) inch waterline within Manono Street are both inadequate to provide the required 2,000 gallons per minute flow for fire protection, as per DWS standards. Estimated maximum daily water usage calculations, prepared by a professional engineer, licensed in the State ofHawai'i, will be submitted to DWS for review and approval. These calculations will include estimated peak flow in gallons per minute and the total estimated maximum daily water usage in gallons per day, including 115 irrigation use. Based on the water demand calculations, the Department will determine the appropriate service lateral and meter size required to satisfy all water needs including fire suppression requirements. The proposed zoning will require the installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly, by a licensed contractor, within five (5) feet of the meter on the Property. If a larger or additional meter is required, a backflow prevention assembly will be installed for that meter. The installation of the backflow prevention assembly will be inspected and approved by DWS before commencement of water service. In the event other agencies require construction improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the Property, Hawaiian Kingdom Brands will be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of affected DWS water system facilities, should they be necessary. Impacts and Mitigating Measures Water efficient fixtures and practices will be installed and implemented throughout all proposed buildings and activities to reduce the demand on water resources. These include low flow systems and timed shut off for appropriate devices in all bathrooms which will also reduce wastewater. The Commission on Water Resource Management also recommends implementing appropriate landscaping irrigation conservation Best Management Practices endorsed by the Landscape Industry Council ofHawai'i. These include installation and maintenance BMPs. Installation Best Management Practices: 1.Irrigation system plans and specifications should include post-constructiondocumentation, including drawing of record ( as-built drawings), maintenancerecommendations, design precipitation rates and manufacturer's operational guide. 2.Design irrigation system with sprinklers spaced with head-to-head coverage or better.3.Irrigate with a precipitation rate not exceeding soil infiltration rate. 4.Design systems to irrigate similar hydrozones such as slope, sun exposure, soilconditions, and plant materials with similar water use.5.Use smart controllers. 6.Encourage the use of drip irrigation for individual specimen plants, shrubs, and treesduring establishment period. 7.Use flow sensors with smart controllers to detect leaks or drastic changes in water use.8.Use an irrigation submeter that measures water use on large sites.9.Use water conservation irrigation components, such as rotary nozzles, pressure regulated spray heads and valves, rain switches, and high efficiency nozzles. 10.Sprinklers in low-lying areas and slopes should be equipped with check valves. 116 11.Incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) storm water design methods, including raingardens, infiltration beds, rain barrels, swales, and basins, that allow water to collect andsoak into the ground on site. 12.Preserve existing native trees and non-invasive vegetation where feasible during development and do not install irrigation in these areas.13.Incorporate compost into soils at planting.14.Encourage xeriscaping practices to include native and non-invasive ornamental plants.15.Encourage the use of non-potable water for irrigation. 16.Use a qualified irrigation designer, irrigation supplier, landscape architect and installation contractor. Maintenance Best Management Practices: 1.If not using a climate-based controller, manually manage controller run times and days towater according to soil conditions and seasonal weather conditions.2.Program irrigation controller to encourage deep watering by using longer, less frequentwatering times to improve deep rooting and increase drought resistance. 3.To reduce the amount of water evaporating from the soil surface, schedule night or earlymorning (5 p.m. to 9 a.m.) start times for established plantings. In areas where ponding,compaction, or runoff occurs, set 2-3 short run time cycles.4.Mulch with wood chips around base of trees and shrub beds and refresh as necessary tomaintain a minimum of two inches. 5.Allow grass to grow taller in summer months to conserve water and encourage deep rooting.6.Aerate lawns when compaction occurs.7.At a minimum, conduct a monthly inspection to verify system operation and correct deficiencies.8.Conduct a practical water audit once every 2 to 5 years by a qualified irrigationprofessional.9.Attend water conservation seminars and webinars including Board ofWarer Supply,Landscape Architects, University of Hawai' i, EPA Water Sense, and the Irrigation Association. 10.Use a licensed maintenance contractor with water conservation expertise. Environmental Setting: Wastewater The proposed project would require the extension of the County sewer line from its terminus near the intersection of Pi'ilani and Mililani Street. The line is proposed to be extended north from its terminus near Mililani Street and Pi'ilani Street to mitigate impacts to Pi'ilani Street (Figure 58). This extension would require a Sewer Extension Application and approval. 117 � Hawaii County Wastewater Web Page The Department of Environmental Management (DEM) may require a sewer line study prior to connection to the County sewer system, which may advise sewer line or other facility improvements for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Hawai'i County Code Section 21-8 prohibits the discharge of unpolluted water into County sewers. Impacts and Mitigating Measures The Hilo Wastewater Treatment Plant facility needs significant repairs to maintain long term functional operations. The proposed development would be a modest addition to the sewer from the proposed use. Efforts to minimize wastewater are reflected in the design of the project. Environmental Setting: Electricity, Schools, Police, Fire, and Hospitals Electricity will be provided by a Hawaiian Electric Light Company (HELCO) connection as well as solar panels. The Hilo police and fire stations are just over 1.5 miles west of the subject site. The closest school is the Chiefess Kapi'olani Elementary School located roughly 1 mile west, on the other side of the Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond. The Hilo hospital, known as Hilo Medical Center, is located roughly 4 miles to the northwest. Impacts and Mitigating Measures There are no anticipated significant impacts to any public utilities or services. No adverse effect to medical, government, social service, or recreational services would occur. The Property is in proximity to the Hilo city center and nearby public services and utilities. 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts Secondary Impacts 119 1.Wastewater The estimated wastewater produced from all proposed actions will be moderate and are not expected to cause significant impacts to the county sewer line or the Hilo Wastewater Treatment Plant. Efforts to minimize wastewater will be enforced at all times and revisited as operations develop. 120 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PAGE 120 OMITTED. SUBJECT NOT APPLICABLE. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative impacts occur when the implementation of several projects, which have individually limited impacts, combine to produce more severe impacts. Draft Environmental Assessments published in the Environmental Notice between 2017 to present and Special Management Area permits were reviewed to assess potential cumulative impacts from other proposed developments in the area. One (1) planned development within 1 mile of the subject site was found to have potential cumulative impacts to the proposed action. It is necessary to consider the potential cumulative impacts the Island Naturals retail and office complex development may have on the proposed action, particularly to traffic. However, the limited information available regarding the planned commercial complex makes it very difficult to predict or assess potential traffic impacts to the Hawaiian Kingdom Brands proposed action. SSFM states, "without a TIAR detailing more specific trip generation and distribution, future traffic volumes for this development cannot be accurately forecast and distributed as part of this report." See Appendix D, Pages 22-23 for SSFM's full assessment. 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals The following permits and approvals are required for the proposed construction of a storage facility in the County ofHawai'i Special Management Area: County of Hawai 'i: Special Management Area Use Permit Plan Approval Grading and Grubbing Permit Building Permits Time Extension for Rezone Ordinance 1992-122 Sewer Extension Application State of Hawai 'i: -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for construction related activitiesStorm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Permit Possible Community Noise Permit for construction related activities 121 3.6 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies 3.6.1 Hawai'i County General Plan The Hawai'i County General Plan serves as a guiding document for decision-making and the implementation of goals for Hawai'i Island. The plan was adopted in 1989 by ordinance and most recently revised in 2005. The General Plan uses the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map to designate land on Hawai'i Island for future developments. The LUPAG is a broad, flexible design tool to guide the direction and quality of future developments in a coordinated and manner. It indicates the general location of various land uses in relation to each other. The designation for the subject Property is Industrial. Due to the importance of the General Plan in determining the suitability of land-use projects and developments, the following goals, policies, and standards that align with the proposed action are discussed below: ECONOMIC GOALS a.Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life through economicdevelopment that enhances the County's natural and social environments.b.Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social, and cultural environments of the island ofHawai'i.d.Provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economicopportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural, natural, and socialenvironment.e.Strive for an economic climate that provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation.f.Strive for diversification of the economy by strengthening existing industries andattracting new endeavors.g.Strive for full employment. h.Promote and develop the island ofHawai'i into a unique scientific and cultural model, where economic gains are in balance with social and physical amenities. Developmentshould be reviewed on the basis of total impact on the residents of the County, not only interms of immediate short run economic benefits. 122 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GOALS a.Define the most desirable use ofland within the County that achieves an ecologicalbalance providing residents and visitors the quality of life and an environment in which the natural resources of the island are viable and sustainable. b.Maintain and, if feasible improve the existing environmental quality of the island.c.Control pollution. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY POLICIES a.Take positive action to further maintain the quality of the environment. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS a.Pollution shall be prevented, abated, and controlled at levels that will protect andpreserve the public health and well-being, through the enforcement of appropriateFederal, State and County standards.b.Incorporate environmental quality controls either as standards in appropriate ordinancesor as conditions of approval. c.Federal and State environmental regulations shall be adhered to. Discussion: The proposed action will not have a significant adverse impact to environmental quality or ecological systems. Any effect that may result will be minimized to the extent practicable and is clearly outweighed by public health, safety, welfare, and other compelling public interests, such as job creation. Regulations relating to site development and operation will safeguard the public health and well-being and ensure all potential environmental impacts are mitigated to the greatest extent possible. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE GOALS a.Protect human life. b.Prevent damage to man-made improvements. c.Control pollution.d.Prevent damage from inundation.e.Reduce surface water and sediment runoff. f.Maximize soil and water conservation. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE POLICIES a.Enact restrictive land use and building structure regulations in areas vulnerable to severedamage due to the impact of wave action. Only uses that cannot be located elsewhere dueto public necessity and character, such as maritime activities and the necessary public facilities and utilities, shall be allowed in these areas. d.Any development within the Federal Emergency Management Agency designatedfloodplain must be in compliance with Chapter 27. 123 g.Development-generated runoff shall be disposed of in a manner acceptable to theDepartment of Public Works and in compliance with all State and Federal laws. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE STANDARDS a."Storm Drainage Standards," County ofHawai'i, October 1970, and as revised. b.Applicable standards and regulations of Chapter 27, "Flood Control," of the Hawai'iCounty Code.c.Applicable standards and regulations of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).d.Applicable standards and regulations of Chapter 10, "Erosion and Sedimentation Control," of the Hawai'i County Code.e.Applicable standards and regulations of the Natural Resources Conservation Service andthe Soil and Water Conservation Districts. Discussion: The Property is in Flood Zone X, or outside the 500-year floodplain and is not expected to impact or be impacted by significant flooding or coastal hazards. Anticipated sea level rise of 3.2 feet, expected to occur as soon as 2060 by some experts, will have no impact on the subject Property. HISTORIC SITES GOALS a.Protect, restore, and enhance the sites, buildings, and objects of significant historical and cultural importance to Hawai'i.b.Appropriate access to significant historic sites, buildings, and objects of public interestshould be made available. HISTORIC SITES POLICIES a.Agencies and organizations, either public or private, pursuing knowledge about historic sites should keep the public apprised of projects.b.Amend appropriate ordinances to incorporate the stewardship and protection of historicsites, buildings, and objects.c.Require both public and private developers of land to provide historical andarchaeological surveys and cultural assessments, where appropriate, prior to the clearing or development of land when there are indications that the land under consideration hashistorical significance.d.Public access to significant historic sites and objects shall be acquired, where appropriate. Discussion: An Archeological Inventory Survey (AIS) conducted in 2018 determined the presence of one historical site on the subject Property. This site is identified as Site 50-10-35-1481.2. It is a concrete slab interpreted as a historic foundation or walkway, a remnant of 124 Operation activities on site are not expected to exceed 70 decibels during daytime or nighttime hours. This includes noise generated onsite from the storage facility. Onsite noise is not expected to impact nearby properties or Wailoa River State Park. If it is determined that a lower decibel maximum is appropriate for the area (for example, Commercial level standards), then further mitigating measures will be applied. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan will mitigate any potential impacts to water quality from construction activities on site. 11.The proposed project will not have a substantial adverse effect on or be likely to sufferdamage by being located in an environmentally sensitive area such as a flood plain,tsunami zone, sea level rise exposure area, beach, erosion-prone area, geologicallyhazardous land, estuary, fresh water, or coastal waters. The Property is in Lava Zone 3 and has the same volcanic/seismic activity risk as much of Hilo. All buildings, would be designed according to State and County code to withstand acceptable levels of seismic activity. The Property is in Flood Zone X, or outside the 500-year floodplain and is not expected to impact or be impacted by significant flooding or coastal hazards. Anticipated sea level rise of 3.2 feet will have no impact on the subject Property. The proposed action would comply with all required codes and regulations regarding drainage and runoff mitigation. There are no anticipated impacts to estuarine habitats, the local non-commercial fishery, nor intermittent anchialine pools that may support endemic species. The proposed action does not involve any activities that would alter existing stream channels, wetlands, or other surface water bodies. Contamination is not a risk for any surface or ground water resource from the proposed action. 12.The proposed project will not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and view planes, during day or night, identified in County or State plans or studies. The proposed development will have limited impacts on scenic resources. The proposed construction will not impose on views to or from any listed resource in the General Plan, 149 REFERENCES Board of Water Supply (BWS). 2022. Hawai'i's Water Cycle. Retrieved from: https://www. boardofwatersupply .com/water-resources/the-water-cycle. Chinen, J.J. 1961. Original Land Title in Hawaii. Published privately in Honolulu, Hawaii. County ofHawai'i, Department of Water Supply. 2010. Hawai'i County Water Use and Development Plan Update. Hawai 'i Water Plan, Final Report. Commission on Water Resource Management. 2019. Water Resource Protection Plan Update. Hawai'i Water Plan, State ofHawai'i. Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM). 2019a. Water Resource Protection Plan Update (WRPP) Appendix F. Hawai'i Water Plan, State ofHawai'i. Department of Health. 2019. Arsenic in Waiaeka Pond: Ecological and Human Concerns. State ofHawai'i. Retrieved from: https://health.hawaii.gov/heer/files/2019/12/Waiakea-Pond-StudyFact-Sheet-Aug-2019 .pdf. Department of Land and Natural Resources. 2019. Professor David Callies Testimony. Retrieved from: https://dlnr.hawaii.gov /occl/files/2019/08/TMT-DO-15-public-trust-doctrine.pdf. Giambelluca, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y.-L. Chen, P.-S. Chu, J.K. Eischeid, and D.M. Delparte, 2013: Online Rainfall Atlas ofHawai'i. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 94, 313-316,doi: 10.l 175/BAMS-D-11-00228.1. Handy, E.S.C., and E.G. Handy. 1972. Native Planters in Old Hawai'i: Their Life, Lore, and Environment. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Hawai'i County Planning Department. 2005. The General Plan, County of Hawai'i. Hilo. Hawai'i Ground Water & Geothermal Resources Center (HGGRC). 2018. Humu'ula Ground water Research Project: Project Info. University ofHawai'i at Manoa. Retrieved from: https ://www .higp.hawaii.edu/hggrc/proj ects/humuula-ground water-research-project/projectinfo/. Hawai'i Office of Planning. 2006. Low Impact Development: A Practitioner's Guide. Coastal Zone Management, pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA03NOS4190082. Hawai'i State Department of Health, Clean Water Branch. (2022). State ofHawai'i Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report: Integrated Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Congress Pursuant to Section 303(d) and 305(b), Clean Water Act (P.L. 97-117). Final. Honolulu, Hawai'i. 151 Thomas, D. 2019. Mauna Kea Hydrology Presentation. Retrieved from: https://www.bigisland videonews.com/2019/09/30/video-mauna-kea-hydrology-presented-by-dr-don-thomas/. Thomas, D. 2018. New Insights into the Ground water Hydrology ofMauna Kea and Hawai'i Island. Mauna Kea Speaker Series: A Monthly Scholar-Focused Presentation in Partnership with Office ofMauna Kea Management, 'Imiloa Astronomy Center and the University ofHawai'i Hilo Department of Physics and Astronomy. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch ?v=tbfa0MpGnuw&t=6s. Thomas, D.M., Paillet, F.L., & Conrad M.E. 1996. Hydrogeology of the Hawai'i Scientific Driling Project borehole KP-1. Ground water geochemistry and regional flow patterns. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 101, No. B5, Pages 11,683-11,694. Trusdell, F.A., and Lockwood, J.P., 2017, Geologic map of the northeast flank ofMauna Loa volcano, Island ofHawai'i, Hawaii: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2932-A, pamphlet 25 p., 2 sheets, scale 1 :50,000, https//doi.org/10.3133/sim2932A. Wolfe, E., Wise, W., and Dalrymple, B. 1997. The geology and petrology ofMauna Kea volcano, Hawai'i-A study of post shield volcanism. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1557. 153 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PI'ILANI SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSE Appendix A Environmental Site Assessment PHASE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 525 Piilani Streeet Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Tax Map Key Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 March 2018 Prepared by: Lehua Environmental Inc. P.O. Box 1018 Kamuela, Hawaii 967 43 Prepared for: Columbus East, LLC. 2571 Lemon Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96815 Table of Contents Figures Appendices List of Acronyms % ASTM AUL CERCLIS CFC CFR CORRACTS DLNR DOH DOT EDR EPA ERNS ESA ft HCC HEER LEI LUST Ma mi mg/L msl N/A NFA NFRAP NPDES NPL NRCS PCB RCRA REC SHWS TMK UIC USGS U.S. UST percent American Society for Testing and Materials activity and use limitation Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System chlorofluorocarbon Code of Federal Regulations Corrective action report State of Hawai'i Department of Land and Natural Resources State of Hawai'i Department of Health Department of Transportation Environmental Data Resources, Inc. United States Environmental Protection Agency Emergency Response Notification System Environmental Site Assessment feet Hawaii County Code Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response Lehua Environmental Inc. leaking underground storage tank millions of years ago miles milligrams per liter mean sea level Not available no further action No Further Remedial Action Planned National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System National Priority List Natural Resource Conservation Service polychlorinated biphenyl Resource Conservation and Recovery Act recognized environmental condition State Hazardous Waste Site tax map key treatment, storage, and disposal underground injection control United States Geological Survey United States underground storage tank This page is intentionally left blank. Executive Summary This report presents the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed by Lehua Environmental Inc. (LEI) for the Tax Map Key (TMK) Parcel located at 525 Piilani Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720: (3) 2-2-033: 011 (hereinafter referred to as the Site). The Site is currently unused undeveloped vacant land. The Site occupies approximately 2.57 acres of land located in Hilo, Hawai'i on the island of Hawaii. This assessment and report have been performed in general accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "All Appropriate Inquiry" (40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312), as well as the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process" (ASTM, 2013). This assessment was conducted to evaluate existing conditions, investigate the environmental history, and identify the presence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) within and around the Site. A REC is defined as "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment." (ASTM, 2013). Research consisted of a review of historical and regulatory records, present conditions, site geology and hydrogeology. This assessment has not revealed evidence of a current REC and has not revealed evidence of any historical RECs in connection with the Site. A historical REC is defined as "a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted residential use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls" (ASTM, 2013). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 This assessment has not revealed evidence of a historical or current REC in connection with the Site. De Minimis Items of Concern •Abandoned tires and trash was observed at the Site. These materials should beproperly disposed. Data Gaps •In performing this Phase I ESA, no data gaps were identified. Vl Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Section 1 Introduction This report presents the results of the Phase I ESA of the Site located in Hilo, Hawai'i on the eastern side of the island of Hawaii (Figure 1). The property is denoted by TMK: (3) 2-2-033: 011. The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the presence of RECs at and surrounding the Site. The assessment of the Site has been performed by qualified environmental professionals as defined by, and in general accordance, with the EPA "All Appropriate Inquiry" (40 CFR Part 312), as well as the ASTM E 1527-013. This Phase I ESA includes a review of relevant geology and hydrogeology, federal, state, and local databases of known or potential hazardous waste sites, landfills, and sites currently under investigation for environmental violations within the ASTM recommended search distance of the Site. It also includes a site inspection and interviews with applicable persons that have knowledge of the site to check for evidence of RE Cs. Figure 1: Location Map 1 This page is intentionally left blank. Section 2 Site Description The Site is currently unused vacant land (Figure 2). The Site is bordered to the north, east and west by undeveloped land, and is bordered by residential and commercial properties to the south. According to Chapter 25 of the Hawaii County Code (HCC), the Site is zoned for Industrial use (HCC, 2005). Topography and Surface Water Flow The topography of the Site is flat at an elevation of approximately 11-13 feet above msl. The topography directs surface flow towards the west. The Site is approximately 590 feet east of Waiakea Pond, which is contiguous with Hilo Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Geology Published geologic and hydrogeologic reports and maps were reviewed to obtain available information regarding subsurface conditions in the general area of the Site. The Island of Hawaii comprises five coalesced shield volcanoes: Kohala, Mauna Kea, Hualalai, Mauna Loa, and Kilauea. The Site is located near the east coast below Mauna Kea Volcano. The Mauna Kea Volcano has passed through the primitive shield-building stage into the late stage and produced a cap of differentiated lavas that almost completely buried the original shield above sea level. The rocks have been divided into an older Hamakua Volcanic Series and a younger Laupahoehoe Volcanic Series with the former becoming further divided into upper and lower members. The top of Mauna Kea consists almost wholly of flows of the Laupahoehoe Series. Rocks of the Hamakua Series are exposed only in Waikahaluu and Pohakuloa gulches on the south flank of the mountain and in another, smaller gulch three kilometers farther west. These volcanic series are covered by a layer of Pahala ash in some areas that reach a thickness of seven and one-half meters along the Wailuku River above Hilo, but gradually thin northward to about two meters towards Paauilo (Macdonald et al., 1983). Soil Soils in the Site area include Keaukaha muck, characterized as Class D soil, with very slow infiltration rates. These soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer (Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), 2018). Groundwater According to Mink and Lau (1990), the entire Site is located above one aquifer, status code 80401111 (11111 ). This type of aquifer is basal (fresh water in contact with salt water), unconfined (where the water table is the upper surface of saturated aquifer), and composed of horizontally extensive (i.e. flank type) geological units (Mink and Lau, 1990). This aquifer is currently used as a drinking water source, is fresh (< 250 milligrams per liter (mg/L) chloride), irreplaceable, and is highly vulnerable to contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). Groundwater resources in the area are listed as being in the Northeast Mauna Loa aquifer system of the Hilo aquifer sector. The groundwater gradient in the vicinity of the Site is likely to the northwest towards Waiakea Pond. Annual average rainfall for the Site area is approximately 160 inches (Giambelluca et al., 2013). 2.1. 1 Wells and Drinking Water Sources The Site is located approximately 0.45 miles seaward (makat) of the underground injection control (UIC) line. The UIC line was established by the State of Hawai'i Department of Health (DOH) to protect groundwater resources. Groundwater mauka of the UIC line is considered a potential drinking water source. Groundwater seaward (makat) of the UIC line is considered as non-potable and saline. Injection wells are prohibited mauka of the UIC line. Results of the EDR report indicated no wells directly on the Site. The EDR also retrieved records for 15 wells within a distance of 1.0 mi to the nearest Site boundary. The wells are used for geothermal power exploration and aquifer research (USGS). 2.2 Historic Land Use The County of Hawaii Planning Department website was examined for review of building permits for the Site and adjacent properties. Permit records are examined in order to identify any associated RECs. Permit records for the Site indicated that a warehouse was demolished at the Site in 1993 and previous tenants of the warehouse included a wood crafts company and Hawaiian Sun Inc. No building permits found represent a REC for the Site (COH, 2017). Aerial Photographs and Topographic Maps Past land use was evaluated by reviewing historical topographic maps and photos. Representative documents were selected to show the evolution of the Site and the surrounding area. The years available with aerial photographs of the Site are 1954, 1975, 1977, 1985, 1988, 1992, and 2000. The earliest available aerial photograph, from 1954, shows one large warehouse and one small warehouse at the Site. The area surrounding the Site was lightly developed with residential, commercial/industrial uses to the south and northeast. Hoolulu Park was located to the east. The 1975-1992 photos depict further density of commercial/industrial use in the surrounding area. The 2000 photo shows the disappearance of the two warehouses previously located at the Site that were demolished in 1993 (EDR, 2018). Topographic maps of the Site available were published during the years 1914, 1917, 1932, 1963, 1980, 1981, 1995 and 2013. The 1914 topographic map depicts concentrated development south of the Site, as well as the presence of a railroad track along the current alignment of the Mamalahoa Highway to the east of the Site. The Waiakea Sugar Mill is located approximately 0.4 miles southwest of the Site. The presence of a former sugar mill may suggest the former use of pesticides and other hazardous materials. However, given the distance from the former mill to the Site, and since the mill site has been redeveloped, it is not likely to have impacted the Site. A 1932 topographic map depicts increased development around the Site, as well as the Hilo Airport to the east of the Site. The 1963 topographic map shows increased development. The 1981 and 1995 topographic maps depict increased density development in Hilo town around the Site (EDR, 2018). 1 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Past land use for the Site was also evaluated using Sanborn Maps for the following years: 1921, 1957, 1974, 1978, 1987 and 1991 (Appendix 8). The Site is just off the mapped areas in all Sanborn Maps found. The 1921-1991 maps show increased residential and light commercial development south of the Site (EDR, 2018). Tax Records Records from the County of Hawaii Real Property Tax Department were reviewed for the Site to assess the chain of title to determine historical uses that may indicate RECs. Tax records show that the Site was used as a commercial goods storage and distribution warehouse since at least 1948, and that the former large warehouse was built and used by the US military in 1942. No information found in the tax records researched reveals a REC for the Site. 2.3 Previous Environmental Reports No previous environmental reports were found for the Site. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Section 3 User Provided Information ASTM E 1527-13 outlines the responsibilities of the user (i.e., the user of this Phase I ESA report, in context of completing a Phase I ESA). A user is defined as the party seeking to use the Phase I ESA to complete an ESA of a property. A user may include a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of property, a lender, or a property manager (ASTM, 2013). In line with this definition, the user is the person/organization requesting this Phase I ESA. As part of completing a Phase I ESA, the user has the following duties: •Communicate in advance of the Site reconnaissance, any specialized knowledge or experience of the user that is material to RE Cs. •Communicate in advance of the Site reconnaissance, any actual knowledge or any environmental lien or AULs encumbering the property or in connection with the property. •Consider the relationship of the purchase price of the property to the fairmarket value of the property if the property was not affected by hazardous substances or petroleum products. •Communicate in advance of the Site reconnaissance, any commonly knownor reasonably ascertainable information within the local community about the property that is material to RECs in connection with the property. •Make known the reason why the user wants to have the Phase I ESA performed. Ms. Fumiyo Okuda, Manager for Columbus East LLC. was interviewed as the Site user. Ms. Okuda has been familiar with the Site for less than one year. Ms. Okuda satisfied User responsibilities under ASTM E1527-13. None of the information obtained from Ms. Okuda represents a REC for the Site. 7 This page is intentionally left blank. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Section 4 Records Review According to the ASTM (2013), "The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review records that will help identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property." The following records and lists were reviewed for sites equal to or greater than the ASTM specified minimum search distance from the Site. Sites Within One Mile of the Site •EPA National Priority List (NPL) •EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action Site (CORRACTS) List •DOH State Hazardous Waste Site (SHWS) •EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Sites Within 0.5 Mile of the Site •EPA Delisted NPL •Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) List •CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) List •EPA RCRA Treatment, Storage, and/or Disposal (TSO) Facilities List •DOH Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists •DOH leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) List On the Site and Adjoining Properties •DOH Registered underground storage tank (UST) List •RCRA Generators List On the Site •Federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) List •EPA Institutional Controls and Engineering Controls Lists •DOH Institutional Control and Engineering Control Lists •DOH Voluntary Response Program List •DOH Brownfields List 9 Explanations of each federal record or list are provided in EDR's report (Appendix 8). DOH records that may not be included in the EDR are included in this report. 4.1 Federal NPL Site List The Federal NPL includes those sites listed and proposed to be listed on the NPL (Superfund), as well those which have had a Superfund Liens notice filed. The NPL is a subset of the CERCLIS, and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. There are no NPL sites listed on or within one mile of the Site (EDR, 2018), and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.2 Federal Delisted NPL Site List There are no delisted NPL sites listed on or within one mile of the Site (EDR, 2018), and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.3 Federal CERCLIS List CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that are either proposed to or on the NPL, as well as sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Additionally, all EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office involved in cleanup activities are listed in this database. There is one CERCLA SEMS site listed; the former Waiakea Pond Products Plant is located approximately 2,200 feet from the Site. Sediment and soil has shown high levels of arsenic and other heavy metals from former use as a sugar mill/canec board treatment plant. There is no concern for the Site from this listing since there is no likely pathway for contamination from the SEMS site. Federal CERCLIS sites listed on or within one mile of the Site; there are no EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office involved in cleanup activities within one mile of the site; and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.4 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List There are no CERCLIS-NFRAP sites listed within one-mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed. (EDR, 2018). 4.5 Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List Hazardous waste handlers with RCRA CORRACTS activity are listed in this database. There are no RCRA CORRACTS facilities located within a mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 4.6 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities List Information on RCRA defined hazardous waste TSO activities are listed in this database. There is one RCRA non-CORRACTS TSO facility listed within one-half mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed. There are no listed violations for the listed site that could impact the Site (EDR, 2018). 4. 7 Federal RCRA Generators List The Federal RCRA generators list includes large, small and conditionally exempt small quantity hazardous waste generators. There are no RCRA generators listed within one-quarter mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.8 Federal Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls Registries This database includes a listing of engineering and institutional controls in place in order to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. There are no federal institutional controls or engineering controls listed within one-quarter mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.9 Federal ERNS List The Federal ERNS List records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. There are no federal ERNS events reported on the Site (EDR, 2018). 4.10 DOH SHWS The SHWS records are the state's equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. The SHWS list contains information on sites identified by the State of Hawai'i as abandoned, inactive, or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that may require cleanup. There were no SHWS within one-quarter of a mile from the Site, and 22 SHWS listed within one mile from the Site (EDR, 2018). •The 22 SHWS reported within one mile of the Site do not represent a REC for the Site due to their cleanup status with DOH and/or distance/elevation/gradientrelative to the Site (EDR, 2018).11 4.11 State Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists Records in this database typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. There are no state or tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal sites listed within one-half mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.12 State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Lists This database includes an inventory of reported LUSTs. There were 10 state LUSTs listed within one-half mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed (DOH, 2004; EDR, 2018). Given the status of the LUST sites (NFA), they are not considered a concern for the Site (EDR, 2018). 4.13 State Registered Underground Storage Tank Lists This database includes an inventory of reported USTs. There are no state USTs listed within one-quarter mile of the Site and the Site is not listed. (DOH, EDR, 2018). None of the UST listings represent a concern for the Site (EDR, 2018). 4.14 State Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries This database includes a listing of sites with engineering and/or institutional controls in place. There were no state engineering and/or institutional controls registered within one-half mile of the Site, and the Site is not registered (EDR, 2018). 4.15 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites This database includes a listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites. There are no state or tribal voluntary cleanup priority sites recorded within one-half mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.16 State Brownfields Sites This database includes an inventory of state and tribal "Brownfield sites" which are defined as: any real property where the expansion, redevelopment or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant (EDR, 2018). There were no state or tribal Brownfield site within one-half mile of the Site, and the Site is not listed (EDR, 2018). 4.17 State Land Records These records include the CERCLA Lien Information, which indicate where the EPA has spent Superfund monies to investigate releases and threatened releases of contamination. Additionally, records of land use control information pertaining to former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties, is included. There are no CERCLA Liens filed at the Site, and there are no records of land use control information within one-half mile of the Site (EDR, 2018). 4.18 Records of Emergency Release Reports This database includes the Hazardous Materials Incident Report System, which incorporates spills reported to the DOT. There are no records of Emergency Release Reports on the Site (EDR, 2018). 4.19 Other Ascertainable Records These records include inventories from a variety of select environmental databases; the full list of which is available in the EDR (EDR, 2018). There were no Other Ascertainable Records found for sites within one-quarter mile of the Site (EDR, 2018). 4.20 EDR Proprietary Records The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes an inventory of coal gas plants compiled by EDR researchers. There are no Manufactured Gas Plants found within a mile of the Site (EDR, 2018). This page is intentionally left blank. Section 5 Current/Historical Use Mr. Harvey Taira, Properties Manager for the previous owner, Suisan Company, Ltd. was interviewed as the Site contact. Mr. Taira has been familiar with the Site for at least 20 years, during which time it was used as a fruit warehouse and Quonset hut prior to being demolished in the early 1990s. Mr. Taira satisfied site contact responsibilities under ASTM E1527-13. None of the information obtained from Mr. Taira represents a REC for the Site. No information disclosed by current or historical owners/occupants represents a REC for the Site. This page is intentionally left blank. Section 6 Site Reconnaissance The Site visit was conducted on Monday, March 26, 2018 by LEI personnel. All observations were based on the Site's conditions at the time of LEl's reconnaissance. Photographs taken during the site visit are included in Appendix A. The Site has been unused and includes natural foliage and small amounts of abandoned tires and garbage. 6.1.1 USTs, Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs), Oil/Water Separators, Pipelines No USTs, ASTs, oil/water separators or pipelines were observed at the Site. 6.1.2 Drains No drains, pits, ponds, pools were observed at the Site. 6.1.3 Indication of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Containing Materials No potentially PCB containing materials were observed at the Site. 6.1.4 Mercury There was no indication of mercury-containing materials at the Site during the time of the Site reconnaissance. 6.1.5 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) No potential CFC-containing materials were observed at the Site. 6.1.6 Stains and Chemical Odors No staining or chemical odors were observed at the Site. 6.1. 7 Adjacent Properties Adjacent property uses include open land and Waiakea Pond to the west, open land to the east and residential and commercial uses to the south. There was no evidence of runoff or other potential contamination observed during the site reconnaissance. Section 7 Data Gaps A data gap is a lack of or inability to obtain information required by ASTM E 1527-13 despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice (ASTM, 2013). In performing this Phase I ESA, no data gaps were identified. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Section 8 Conclusions and Opinions This Phase I ESA has been performed in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13 for the Site. Any exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are described in Section 9 of this report. This assessment has not revealed evidence of a historical or current REC in connection with the Site. De Minimis Items of Concern •Abandoned tires and trash was observed at the Site. These materials should be properly disposed. Data Gaps •In performing this Phase I ESA, no data gaps were identified.19 This page is intentionally left blank. Section 9 Limitations The conclusions and recommendations of this ESA have been based on interpretation of the available historical and regulatory information, and a visual Site reconnaissance. No guarantee or warrant is made that the Site is free of contamination. This Phase I ESA was performed with the usual competence and thoroughness of the consulting profession, in accordance with the standard operating procedures of this time. LEI does not provide any other guarantee or warranty. This Phase I ESA is not a comprehensive site characterization and should not be construed as such. The opinions presented in this report are based on findings derived from a site reconnaissance and a review of specified regulatory records and historical sources. This Phase I ESA did not include any investigation with respect to lead, asbestos, arsenic, radon, methane, regulatory compliance, cultural and historical resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, endangered species, indoor air quality, or site geotechnical concerns. All information on UST and LUST sites are based on information reported to the DOH Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch. All information on DOH Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response (HEER) listed sites and release sites are based on information reported to the DOH HEER Office. There are no exceptions or deletions to ASTM practice in this Phase I ESA. This page is intentionally left blank. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK Parcel (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Section 10 References ASTM, 2013. Standard Practice for ESAs: Phase I ESA Process. ASTM, E 1527-13. COH, 2017. County of Hawaii Planning Department website. Accessed at http://www.cohplanningdept.com/ on March 20, 2013. DOH, 2004. DOH, UST/LUST Database. Available http://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/waste/ust/data.html. EDR, 2018. The EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck, Hilo, Hawai'i, online at: Giambelluca, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y.-L. Chen, P.-S. Chu, J.K. Eischeid, and D.M. Delparte, 2013: Online Rainfall Atlas ofHawai'i. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 94, 313-316, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00228. Google, 2007. Google Earth Imagery. HCC, 2005. Hawai'i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as amended). Macdonald, G.; Abbott, A.; and Peterson, F., 1983. Volcanoes in the Sea, University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu, Hawai'i. Mink, J. F. and Lau, S., 1990. Aquifer Identification and Classification for Hawaii: Groundwater Protection Strategy for Hawai'i. Water Resources Research Center, University ofHawai'i, Technical Report 179. February. 23 Appendix A: Photographs Appendix B: EDR Database Search 525 Piilani Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 5207731.2s March 05, 2018 The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck® �EDR' 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com FORM-LBC-RG ��--------T_A_B_L_E _o _F_c_o_N_T_E_N _T _s______ _ SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ______________________________________________________ _ ES1 Overview Map __________________________________________________________ _ 2 Detail Map _____________________________________________________________ _ 3 Map Findings Summary ___________________________________________________ _ 4 MapFlndinga __________________________________________________________ _ 8 Orphan Summary ________________________________________________________ . 56 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking _________________________ _ GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum__________________________________________ A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary ___________________________________________ . A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map ___________________________________________ A-5 Physical Setting Source Map ________________________________________________ A-7 Physical Setting Source Map Findings________________________________________ A-9 Physical Setting Source Records Searched ____________________________________ . PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice I I This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDA and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC5207731.2s Page 1 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDA). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 525 PIILANI STREET HILO, HI 96720 COORDINATES Latitude (North): 19.7172100 -19° 43' 1.95" Longitude (West): 155.0709960 -155° 4' 15.58" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 5 UTM X (Meters): 282938.7 UTM Y (Meters): 2181382.2 Elevation: 12 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: Version Date: 5949390 HILO, HI 2013 TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 � MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Pro�ert� Address: 525 PIILANI STREET HILO, HI 96720 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION KUAWA STREET SOCCER KAMEHAMEHA HWY AND M SHWS Lower 1689, 0.320, North A2 WAIAKEA UPLAND AASEN CORNER OF MILILANI A SHWS Higher 1698, 0.322, South A3 EXEMPT UST CLOSURE A 458 KEKUANAOA ST SHWS, SPILLS Higher 1771, 0.335, South A4 EXCELSIOR DAIRY 458 KEKAUANAOA ST LUST.UST Higher 1771, 0.335, South 5 S.K.ODA, LTD. 180 KALANIKOA ST LUST,UST Higher 1787, 0.338, ENE 6 PHILLIPS U DRIVE INC 920 PIILANI ST LUST.UST Higher 1841, 0.349, East 7 JACK'S TOURS 226 KANOELEHUA AVE LUST,UST Lower 2188, 0.414, ENE 8 SHIPMAN GENERATING S 20 BANYAN DRIVE RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-SQG Lower 2225, 0.421, NNE B9 WAIAKEA POND/HAWAIIA HILO SEMS Higher 2296, 0.435, West B10 LARRY'S CHEVRON 835 KILAUEA AVE SHWS, LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Higher 2361, 0.447, West 11 HELCO PIPELINE RELEA KANOELEHUA AVE & HUA SHWS Higher 2385, 0.452, ESE 12 UST EXCAVATED BISHOP BISHOP ST AND KAMEHA SHWS Lower 2406, 0.456, NW C13 TESORO GAS EXPRESS 8 1672 KAMEHAMEHA AVE LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Lower 2449, 0.464, NE C14 HARPER CAR & TRUCK R 1690 KAMEHAMEHA AVE LUST.UST Lower 2460, 0.466, NE D15 DUKE'S SHELL 1104 KILAUEA AVE. LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Higher 2508, 0.475, SW D16 PACIFIC RENT-ALL, IN 1080 KILAUEA AVE LUST.UST Higher 2523, 0.478, SW 17 AIM HILO 761 KEKUANAOA ST LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Higher 2629, 0.498, SE 18 HILO SHOPPING CENTER 1255 KILAUEA AVE SHWS, SPILLS Higher 2766, 0.524, SW 19 KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE 774 KAMEHAMEHA AVE SHWS, LUST, UST, INST CONTROL, SPILLS, Financial. .. Lower 2786, 0.528, NW 20 STATIONERS CORPORATI 708 KANOELEHUA AVE SHWS, SPILLS Higher 3356, 0.636, SE 21 HELCO PIPELINE ANOMA 126 BANYAN WY SHWS, SPILLS Lower 3459, 0.655, NE 22 SUN SUN LAU CHOP SUE 1055 KINOOLE ST SHWS, SPILLS Higher 3604, 0.683, WSW E23 HILO QUALITY WASHERE 210 HOKU ST SHWS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS Higher 3788, 0.717, West E24 HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST RCRA-CESQG, SHWS, SPILLS, FINDS, ECHO, AIRS Higher 4011, 0.760, West 25 HILO SODA WORKS 270 E KAWILI ST SHWS, LUST, UST Higher 4086, 0.774, South 26 HATADA BAKERY (FORME 55 KUKUAU ST SHWS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS Higher 4407, 0.835, WNW 27 HILO MACARONI FACTOR 639 KINOOLE ST SHWS, SPILLS Higher 4558, 0.863, West 28 WOOD PROTECTION COMP 150 KEAA ST SHWS, SPILLS Higher 4575, 0.866, ENE 29 HILO MECHANICAL, INC 50 HOLOMUA ST SHWS Higher 4651, 0.881, SSE 30 HILO GAS COMPANY LTD 51-53 PONAHAWAI ST EDR MGP Lower 4708, 0.892, WNW 31 USDA FOREST SERVICE 1643 KILAUEA AVE SHWS Higher 4712, 0.892, South 32 HAWAII PEST CONTROL 56 WIWOOLE ST SHWS Higher 4887, 0.926, SSE 33 KANOELEHUA INDUSTRIA 20 POOKELA ST SHWS, BROWNFIELDS Higher 4946, 0.937, SSE 34 HILO ARSENIC 33B LILIUOKALANI LN SHWS, ENG CONTROLS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS Higher 5037, 0.954, WNW 5207731.2s Page 2 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL ________________________ . National Priority List Proposed NPL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS ___________________ Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL ________________ National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCL/S list FEDERAL FACILITY _________ Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE _____________ Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS _________________ . Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG __________________ RCRA -Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG __________________ RCRA -Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG _______________ RCRA -Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls I engineering controls registries LUCIS _______________________ Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS _________ Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL _________ Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS ________________________ Emergency Response Notification System TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF ______________________ Permitted Landfills in the State of Hawaii State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST ________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST __________________ . Underground Storage Tank Listing UST _________________________ Underground Storage Tank Database INDIAN UST _________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal institutional control I engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS ____________ Engineering Control Sites INST CONTROL ____________ Sites with Institutional Controls State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP _________________________ Voluntary Response Program Sites INDIAN VCP _________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWN FIELDS _____________ . Brownfields Sites ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS __________ A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill I Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODL _______________ . Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 __________ Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODL ________________________ Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS ___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste I Contaminated Sites US HIST COL _______________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register COL ________________________ Clandestine Drug Lab Listing US COL ____________________ . National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2.. _____________________ CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS _______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I SPILLS ______________________ Release Notifications SPILLS 90 ___________________ SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen I NLR.. ________ RCRA-Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS ________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD _________________________ Department of Defense Sites SCRO DRYCLEANERS ______ State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR ______________ Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST ____________ EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION __________ . 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA _______________________ Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS _________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS ________________________ Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD _________________________ Records Of Decision RMP _________________________ Risk Management Plans RAATS ______________________ . RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP _________________________ Potentially Responsible Parties PADS ________________________ PCB Activity Database System ICIS _________________________ . Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS ________________________ FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System -FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) ML TS ________________________ Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE____________ Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA_ _____________ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER.. ______ . PCB Transformer Registration Database RAD INFO ____________________ Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS ___________________ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS ____________________ Incident and Accident Data CONSENT_ __________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV _____________ Indian Reservations FUS RAP _____________________ Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA_ _____________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS ____________ Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS _____________________ Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES ___________________ Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES ________ Abandoned Mines FINDS _______________________ Facility Index System/Facility Registry System DOCKET HWC _______________ Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO _________________________ Unexploded Ordnance Sites ECHO _______________________ . Enforcement & Compliance History Information FUELS PROGRAM ___________ EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing AIRS _________________________ List of Permitted Facilities DRYCLEANERS _____________ Permitted Drycleaner Facility Listing Financial Assurance __________ Financial Assurance Information Listing UIC __________________________ Underground Injection Wells Listing EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto _______________ . EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR Hist Cleaner_ ___________ . EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS ___________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF ______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST ___________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDA Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCL/S list SEMS: SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. A review of the SEMS list, as provided by EDA, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation WAIAKEA POND/HAWAIIA Address HILO Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Direction/ Distance Map ID Page W 1/4 -1/2 (0.435 mi.) 89 15 RCRA-TSDF: RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. A review of the RCRA-TSDF list, as provided by EDA, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I RCRA-TSDF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SHIPMAN GENERA TING S State-and tribal -equivalent CERCLIS 20 BANYAN DRIVE NNE 1/4 -112 (0.421 mi.) 8 SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Health. A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/23/2018 has revealed that there are 22 SHWS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID WAIAKEA UPLAND AASEN CORNER OF MILILANI A S 1/4 -1/2 (0.322 mi.) A2 EXEMPT UST CLOSURE A 458 KEKUANAOA ST S 1/4 -112 (0.335 mi.) A3 LARRY'S CHEVRON 835 KILAUEA AVE W 1/4 -112 (0.447 mi.) 810 HELCO PIPELINE RELEA KANOELEHUA AVE & HUA ESE 1/4 -1/2 (0.452 mi.) 11 HILO SHOPPING CENTER 1255 KILAUEA AVE SW 112 -1 (0.524 mi.) 18 STATIONERS CORPORA Tl 708 KANOELEHUA AVE SE 112 -1 (0.636 mi.) 20 SUN SUN LAU CHOP SUE 1055 KINOOLE ST WSW 112 -1 (0.683 mi.) 22 HILO QUALITY WASHERE 210 HOKU ST W 112-1 (0.717 mi.) E23 HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST W 112-1 (0.760 mi.) E24 HILO SODA WORKS 270 E KAW/LI ST S 112-1 (0.774 mi.) 25 HATADA BAKERY (FORME 55KUKUAU ST WNW 1/2 -1 (0.835 mi.) 26 HILO MACARONI FACTOR 639 KINOOLE ST W 112 -1 (0.863 mi.) 27 WOOD PROTECTION COMP 150KEAA ST ENE 112 -1 (0.866 mi.) 28 HILO MECHANICAL, INC 50 HOLOMUA ST SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) 29 USDA FOREST SERVICE 1643 KILAUEA AVE S 1/2 - 1 (0.892 mi.) 31 HAWAII PEST CONTROL 56 WIWOOLE ST SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.926 mi.) 32 KANOELEHUAINDUSTRIA 20 POOKELA ST SSE 112 -1 (0.937 mi.) 33 HILO ARSENIC 338 LILIUOKALANI LN WNW 112 -1 (0.954 mi.) 34 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID KUAWA STREET SOCCER KAMEHAMEHA HWY AND M N 1/4 -1/2 (0.320 mi.) 1 UST EXCAVATED BISHOP BISHOP ST AND KAMEHA NW 1/4 -1/2 (0.456 mi.) 12 KHI INC. OBA BAYSIDE 774 KAMEHAMEHA AVE NW 1/2 -1 (0.528 mi.) 19 HELCO PIPELINE ANOMA 126BANYAN WY NE 112 -1 (0.655 mi.) 21 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Health's Active Leaking Underground Storage Tank Log Listing. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/01/2017 has revealed that there are 1 O LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. 13 Page 8 9 16 18 28 33 36 37 39 44 46 47 49 50 51 52 53 53 Page 8 19 29 34 TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I Equal/Higher Elevation EXCELSIOR DAIRY Release ID: 990210 Facility Id: 9-603524 Address 458 KEKAUANAOA ST Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) S.K. ODA, LTD. 180 KALANIKOA ST Release ID: 900012 Facility Id: 9-600449 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) PHILLIPS U DRIVE INC 920 Pl/LANI ST Release ID: 940182 Facility Id: 9-600480 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) LARRY'S CHEVRON 835 KILAUEA AVE Release ID: 030044 Facility Id: 9-601136 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) DUKE'S SHELL 1104 KILAUEA AVE. Release ID: 020029 Release ID: 930099 Facility Id: 9-601320 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) PACIFIC RENT-ALL, IN 1080 KILAUEA AVE Release ID: 940099 Facility Id: 9-601678 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) AIM HILO 761 KEKUANAOA ST Release ID: 050009 Facility Id: 9-601195 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) Lower Elevation Address JACK'S TOURS 226 KANOELEHUA AVE Release ID: 030001 Facility Id: 9-603750 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) TESORO GAS EXPRESS 8 Release ID: 940057 Facility Id: 9-600708 1672 KAMEHAMEHA AVE Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) HARPER CAR & TRUCK R 1690 KAMEHAMEHA AVE Release ID: 960054 Facility Id: 9-603156 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) Direction / Distance Map ID Page S 1/4 -112 (0.335 mi.) A4 11 ENE 1/4 -112 (0.338 mi.) 5 E 1/4 -112 (0.349 mi.) 6 W 1/4 -112 (0.447 mi.) B10 SW 1/4 -112 (0.475 mi.) D15 SW 1/4 -112 (0.478 mi.) D16 SE 1/4 -1/2 (0.498 mi.) 17 Direction / Distance Map ID ENE 1/4 -112 (0.414 mi.) 7 NE 1/4 -112 (0.464 mi.) C13 NE 1/4 -112 (0.466 mi.) C14 11 12 16 23 26 26 Page 12 20 22 TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1 B00's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. A review of the EDR MGP list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR MGP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Lower Elevation Address HILO GAS COMPANY LTD 51-53 PONAHAWAI ST Direction/ Distance Map ID Page WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.892 mi.) 30 51 TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 ��--------Ex_E_c_u_T_iv_E _su_M_M_A_R_v_______ �' I Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 10 records. Site Name HILO JUDICIARY CENTER PROJECT HILO SAFEWAY/TARGET ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY #2 PACIFIC AQUACULTURE AND COASTAL RE HAWAII COUNTY KAMEHAMEHA AVENUE IM WAIAKEA MILL COMPANY -CAMP 1 ARSENIC MILILANI STREET IN HILO WAILOA RIVER STATE RECREATION AREA KILAUEA VOLCANO AIR MONITORING HILO BAY FRONT SOCCER FIELD Database(s) SHWS, ENG CONTROLS, INST CONTROL SHWS, ENG CONTROLS, INST CONTROL SHWS SHWS, BROWNFIELDS SHWS SHWS SHWS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS SHWS SEMS SEMS-ARCHIVE TC5207731.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 OVERVIEW MAP -5207731.2S 1 MIies N Target Property ... Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property •Sites at elevations lower than the target property .i. Manufactured Gas Plants •Sensitive Receptors EJ National Priority List Sites c:::J Dept. Defense Sites SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo HI 96720 ADDRESS: LAT/LONG: 19.71721 / 155.070996 DETAIL MAP-5207731.2S ���------, 0 1/16 [:] Indian Reservations BIA � 100-year flood zone W 500-year flood zone D National Wetland Inventory D State Wetlands INTERIM HEALTHCARE/ Hie INTERIM HEALTHCARE HILO 1/8 1/4Mlles This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC CONTACT: Kama INQUIRY#: 5207731.2s DATE: March 05, 2018 12:59 pm Copyright© 2018 EDR, Inc.© 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015. � MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 >1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCL/S list FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SEMS 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list $EMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls I engineering controls registries LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 State-and tribal -equivalent CERCLIS SHWS 1.000 0 0 6 16 NR 22 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 0 0 10 NR NR 10 INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TC5207731.2s Page 4 � MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 >1 Plotted UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal institutional control I engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWN FIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Landfill I Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste I Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Local Land Records LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 SPILLS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCAD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 TC5207731.2s Page 5 � MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 >1 Plotted TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LEAD SMEL TEAS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ABANDONED MINES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 uxo 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 -Totals --0 0 0 18 17 0 35 TC5207731.2s Page 6 ��---------M _ A _ P _ F _ 1N _ o _ 1 _ N _ G _ s _ s _ u _ M _ M _ A _ R _ v ________ � Database NOTES: TP = Target Property Search Distance (Miles) Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database <1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 >1 Total Plotted TC5207731.2s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. Elevation Site EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1 North 1/4-1/2 0.320 mi. 1689 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 3 ft. A2 South 1/4-1/2 0.322mi. 1698 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 19 ft. KUAWA STREET SOCCER FIELDS DEVELOPMENT SITE KAMEHAMEHA HWY AND MANONO ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Kuawa Street Soccer Fields Development Site HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: John Peard Hazard Priority: Medium Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Present Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Kuawa Street Soccer Fields Development Site HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Present Priority: Medium Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Ongoing SHWS S118422838 NIA Nature of Contamination: Found: Contaminants found over Tier 1 EALs in site screening: Lead and Arsenic. Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Controls Required to Manage Contamination Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported Document Date: Not reported Document Number: Not reported Document Subject: Not reported Project Manager: John Peard Contact Information: (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,HI 96720 WAIAKEA UPLAND ARSENIC SITE CORNER OF MILILANI AND KEKUANAO STREETS HILO, HI 96720 Site 1 of 3 in cluster A SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Portion of Hawaii Cane Products site Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Waiakea Upland Arsenic Site HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013775619 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: John Peard Hazard Priority: Low SHWS S110061849 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. WAIAKEA UPLAND ARSENIC SITE (Continued) Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Present Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Waiakea Upland Arsenic Site HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013775619 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Present Priority: Low Assessment: Assessment Ongoing Response: Not reported Nature of Contamination: Found: Arsenic in soil. Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Controls Required to Manage Contamination Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNeti�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported Document Date: Not reported Document Number: Not reported Document Subject: Not reported Project Manager: John Peard EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S110061849 Contact Information: (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,HI 96720 A3 South 1/4-1/2 0.335 mi. EXEMPT UST CLOSURE AT EXCELSIOR DAIRY 458 KEKUANAOA ST HILO, HI 96720 1771 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster A Relative: Higher Actual: 20 ft. SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Exempt UST Closure at Excelsior Dairy HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013781201 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Exempt UST Closure at Excelsior Dairy HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013781201 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Found: Diesel Nature of Residual Contamination: Use Restrictions: Engineering Control: Description of Restrictions: Institutional Control: Diesel No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential Use Not reported Not reported Not reported SHWS SPILLS 1006820203 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 9 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number EXEMPT UST CLOSURE AT EXCELSIOR DAIRY (Continued) Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 12/19/2005 Document Number: 2005-671-MS Document Subject: NFA letter for diesel UST at Excelsior Dairy Hilo Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Contact Information: (808)586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19991112-1052 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110013781201 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: No Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Exempt UST Closure @ Excelsior Dairy Diesel Fuel Not reported Not reported Not reported Response Bill Perry Not reported Refer to ISST Excelsior Dairy, Inc. 19.66932 -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19991112-1052 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110013781201 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: No Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Exempt UST Closure @ Excelsior Dairy Diesel Fuel Not reported Not reported Not reported Response Bill Perry Not reported Refer to ISST Excelsior Dairy, Inc. 19.71148 -155.071966 1006820203 TC5207731.2s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site A4 South 1/4-1/2 0.335 mi. EXCELSIOR DAIRY 458 KEKAUANAOA ST HILO, HI 96720 1771 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster A Relative: Higher Actual: 20 ft. 5 ENE 1/4-1/2 0.338 mi. 1787 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 13 ft. LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: 9-603524Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) 02/23/2006 990210 Shaobin Li 9-603524EXCELSIOR DIARY, INC C/O MOUNTAIN VIEW DAIRY, INC POB 101 Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.711522 Longitude: -155.071813 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: Address Matching Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: S.K. ODA, LTD. 180 KALANIKOA ST HILO, HI 96720 LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: R-2 01/01/1970 Permanently Out of Use 06/07/1999 550 Gasoline 9-600449 Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) 09/27/1994 900012 Eric Sadoyama 9-600449 S.K. ODA, LTD. 1088 WAIHOLO ST Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.719967 Longitude: -155.065869 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: Address Matching Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: R-103/21/1961 Permanently Out of Use Not reported 6000 Gasoline EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST U003711780 UST NIA LUST U001236872 UST NIA TC5207731.2s Page 11 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site 6 East 1/4-1/2 0.349 mi. 1841 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 21 ft. 7 ENE 1/4-1/2 0.414 mi. 2188 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 11 ft. PHILLIPS U DRIVE INC. 920 PIILANI ST HILO, HI 96720 LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: 9-600480Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)08/18/1994 940182 Eric Sadoyama 9-600480PHILLIPS U DRIVE INC. 920 PIILANI ST Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.716300 Longitude: -155.065379 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: Address Matching Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: JACK'S TOURS 226 KANOELEHUA AVE HILO, HI 96720 LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: R-104/24/1976 Permanently Out of Use 03/19/1991 8000 Gasoline 9-603750 Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) 01/31/2003 030001 Jose Ruiz 9-603750JACK IWAO MIYASHIRO RECOVABLE LIVING TRUST C/O ELLEN MIYASHIRO SAKAGAWA 5871 SOLEDAD ROAD Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.719360 Longitude: -155.064476 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: Address Matching Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: R-1Not reported Permanently out of Use 10/04/2002 10000 Gasoline EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST U001236891 UST NIA LUST U003886215 UST NIA TC5207731.2s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site 8 NNE 1/4-1/2 0.421 mi. 2225 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 8 ft. JACK'S TOURS (Continued) Tank ID: R-2Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: Not reportedPermanently out of Use 10/04/2002 10000 Diesel R-3Not reported Permanently out of Use 10/04/2002 1000 Used Oil SHIPMAN GENERATING STATION 20 BANYAN DRIVE HILO, HI 96720 RCRA-TSDF: Date form received by agency: 03/19/2003 Facility name: SHIPMAN GENERATING STATION Facility address: 20 BANYAN DRIVE HILO, HI 96720 EPA ID: HIT000610899 Mailing address: P.O. BOX 1027 HILO, HI 96721-1027 Contact: DONN F FUKADA Contact address: Contact country: Contact telephone: Contact email: EPA Region: Land type: Classification: Not reported Not reported us 808-543-4525Not reported 09 Private TSDF EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RCRA-TSDF RCRA-SQG U003886215 1007092162 HIT000610899 Description: Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: HAWAII ELEC LIGHT CO Owner/operator address: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner 01/01/1920 Not reported HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, INC. Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 13 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site SHIPMAN GENERATING STATION (Continued) HI Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Handler Activities Summary: us Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Operator 01/01/1920 Not reported U.S. importer of hazardous waste:No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: Yes Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D006 Waste name: CADMIUM Waste code: D008 Waste name: LEAD Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 10/05/1993 Site name: HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT CO SHIPMAN GEN STE Classification: Not a generator, verified Date form received by agency: 07/29/1993 Site name: HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT CO SHIPMAN GEN STE Classification: Not a generator, verified Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Regulation violated: Not reported Area of violation: Generators -Pre-transport Date violation determined: 01/18/2008 Date achieved compliance: 09/03/2008 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action date: 01/18/2008 Enf. disposition status: Not reported Ent. disp. status date: Not reported EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1007092162 TC5207731.2s Page 14 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site B9 West 1/4-1/2 0.435mi. 2296 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 19 ft. SHIPMAN GENERATING STATION (Continued) Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Not reported Generators -General 01/18/2008 09/03/2008 Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL 01/18/2008 Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Not reported Not reported Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Evaluation Action Summary: Evaluation date: 09/26/2007 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SIT E Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Generators -General 09/03/2008 Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: 09/26/2007 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SIT E Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Generators -Pre-transport 09/03/2008 Evaluation lead agency: State WAIAKEA POND/HAWAIIAN CANE PRDTS PLANT HILO HILO, HI 96720 Site 1 of 2 in cluster B SEMS: Site ID: EPAID: Cong District: FIPS Code: Latitude: Longitude: FF: NPL: Non NPL Status: SEMS Detail: Region: Site ID: EPAID: Site Name: NPL: FF: OU: Action Code: Action Name: 900302 HID982400475 2 15001 Not reported Not reported N Not on the NPL Other Cleanup Activity: State-Lead Cleanup 9 900302 HID982400475 WAIAKEA POND/H AWAII AN CANE PRDT S PLANT N N 0 SI SI EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1007092162 SEMS 1000147193 HID982400475 TC5207731.2s Page 15 B10 West 1/4-1/2 0.447mi. 2361 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 19 ft. WAIAKEA POND/HAWAIIAN CANE PRDTS PLANT (Continued) LARRY'S CHEVRON 835 KILAUEA AVE HILO, HI 96720 Site 2 of 2 in cluster B SHWS LUST UST Financial Assurance 1000147193 U001237010 NIA Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number LARRY'S CHEVRON (Continued) Facility Registry Identifier: 110013772471 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFAAssessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Not reported Nature of Residual Contamination: Petroleum contaminated soil Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 06/30/2004 Document Number: 2004-252-MS Document Subject: NFA letter for Larry's Kilauea Chevron Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: 9-601136Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)09/07/2004 030044 Richard Takaba 9-601136CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY91-480 MALAKOLE ST.Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.716121 Longitude: -155.07837 4Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: GPS Tank ID: R-1Date Installed: 07/17/1983 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 08/20/2003 Tank Capacity: 10000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: R-2Date Installed: 07/17/1983 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 08/20/2003 Tank Capacity: 10000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: R-3 Date Installed: 07/17/1983Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use U001237010 TC5207731.2s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M_A_P_F_IN_D_I_N_G_s _____ ___. Elevation Site 11 ESE 1/4-1/2 0.452mi. 2385 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 30 ft. LARRY'S CHEVRON (Continued) Date Closed: 08/20/2003 Tank Capacity: 10000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: HI Financial Assurance: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: R-407/17/1983 Permanently Out of Use 08/20/2003 1000 Used Oil 9-601136R-1Permanently Out of UseSelf InsuredNot reported 9-601136R-2Permanently Out of UseSelf InsuredNot reported 9-601136R-3Permanently Out of UseSelf InsuredNot reported 9-601136R-4Permanently Out of UseSelf InsuredNot reported HELCO PIPELINE RELEASE HUALANI HILO KANOELEHUA AVE & HUALANI ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: HELCO Pipeline Release Hualani Hilo HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Not reported Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: HELCO Pipeline Release Hualani Hilo EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U001237010 SHWS S106817545 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 18 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 12 NW 1/4-1/2 0.456mi. 2406 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 4 ft. HELCO PIPELINE RELEASE HUALANI HILO (Continued) HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Priority: NFA No Hazard Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Found: Oil pipeline break Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 02/16/2010 Document Number: 2010-123-RP S106817545 Document Subject: NFA -Hualani Pipeline Release, Removal Action Report, Hawaiian Electric Light Company, Hilo Hawaii Project Manager: Not reported Contact Information: (808)586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 UST EXCAVATED BISHOP AND KAMEHAMEHA BISHOP ST AND KAMEHAMEHA AVE HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: UST excavated Bishop and Kamehameha HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: John Peard Hazard Priority: Low Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: UST excavated Bishop and Kamehameha HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Priority: Low Assessment: Assessment Ongoing Response: Not reported Nature of Contamination: Not reported Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Undetermined Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported Document Date: Not reported SHWS S118943724 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 19 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site UST EXCAVATED BISHOP AND KAMEHAMEHA (Continued) Document Number: Document Subject: Project Manager: Not reported Not reported John Peard EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S118 943724 Contact Information: (808)933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,HI 96720 C13 NE 1/4-1/2 0.464mi. TESORO GAS EXPRESS 82 1672 KAMEHAMEHA AVE HILO, HI 96720 2449 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster C Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: Latitude: 9-600708 Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)06/19/2000 940057 Jeffrey Ung 9-600708Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company, LLC 3450 S. 344th Way, Suite 201 Hilo, 96720 96720 19.722237 Longitude: -155.065577 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: GPS Tank ID: R-1Date Installed: 05/11/1956 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 04/17/1994 Tank Capacity: 3000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: R-2 Date Installed: 05/11/1956 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 04/17/1994 Tank Capacity: 2000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: R-5Date Installed: 05/11/1956 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 04/17/1994 Tank Capacity: 500 Substance: Used Oil Tank ID: r-87Date Installed: 04/01/1988 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 05/04/2005 LUST UST Financial Assurance U003402964 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 20 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M_A_P_F_IN_D_I_N_G_s _____ ___. TESORO GAS EXPRESS 82 (Continued) Tank Capacity: 8000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: HI Financial Assurance: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: r-9204/01/1988Permanently Out of Use 05/04/2005 8000 Gasoline 9-600708r-87Permanently Out of UseOtherNot reported 9-600708r-92Permanently Out of UseGuaranteeNot reported 9-600708r-87Permanently Out of UseGuaranteeNot reported 9-600708R-5Permanently Out of UseOtherNot reported 9-600708R-2Permanently Out of UseOtherNot reported 9-600708R-2Permanently Out of UseGuaranteeNot reported 9-600708R-1Permanently Out of UseGuaranteeNot reported 9-600708R-1Permanently Out of Use EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U003402964 TC5207731.2s Page 21 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site C14 NE 1/4-1/2 0.466mi. TESORO GAS EXPRESS 82 (Continued) FRTYPE: Other Expiration Date: Not reported Alt Facility ID: 9-600708Tank Id: r-92 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use FRTYPE: OtherExpiration Date: Not reported Alt Facility ID: 9-600708Tank Id: R-5 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use FRTYPE: Guarantee Expiration Date: Not reported HARPER CAR & TRUCK RENTALS OF HAWAII 1690 KAMEHAMEHA AVE HILO, HI 96720 2460 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: Latitude: 9-603156 Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)06/24/2000 960054 Richard Takaba 9-603156Harper Car & Truck Rentals of Hawaii 4456 KALANIANAOLE AVE Hilo, 96720 96720 19.722400 Longitude: -155.064895 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: Address Matching Tank ID: R-1Date Installed: Not reported Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 04/02/1996 Tank Capacity: 1000 Substance: Diesel Tank ID: R-2 Date Installed: Not reported Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 04/02/1996 Tank Capacity: 8050 Substance: Gasoline EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST UST U003402964 U003222397 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 22 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. D15 SW 1/4-1/2 0.475 mi. Site DUKE'S SHELL 1104 KILAUEA AVE. HILO, HI 96720 2508 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster D Relative: Higher Actual: 23 ft. LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: 9-601320Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) 09/18/2002 020029 Jose Ruiz 9-601320Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) 06/19/2002 930099 Jose Ruiz 9-601320ALOHA PETROLEUM, LTD. 1132 BISHOP STREET, SUITE 1700 Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.712473 Longitude: -155.077 499 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: Map Tank ID: 1 Date Installed: 03/22/1990 Tank Status: Currently in Use Date Closed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance: Gasohol Tank ID: 2 Date Installed: 03/22/1990 Tank Status: Currently in Use Date Closed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance: Gasohol Tank ID: 3 Date Installed: 03/22/1990 Tank Status: Currently in Use Date Closed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance: Diesel Tank ID: R-1 Date Installed: 04/18/1972 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 03/22/1990 Tank Capacity: 8000 Substance: Gasoline Database(s) LUST UST Financial Assurance EDA ID Number EPA ID Number U001237039 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 23 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. DUKE'S SHELL (Continued) Tank ID: R-2 Date Installed: 04/18/1972 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 03/22/1990 Tank Capacity: 6000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: HI Financial Assurance: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: R-3 04/18/1972 Permanently Out of Use 03/22/1990 6000 Gasoline R-403/22/1990Permanently Out of Use 04/04/2002 550 Used Oil R-404/18/1972Permanently Out of Use 03/22/1990 550 Used Oil 9-601320R-2 Permanently Out of Use Not reported Not reported 9-601320 R-4Permanently Out of Use Not reported Not reported 9-601320 R-3 Permanently Out of Use Not reported Not reported 9-601320 R-1 Permanently Out of Use Not reported Not reported 9-601320 EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U001237039 TC5207731.2s Page 24 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. DUKE'S SHELL (Continued) Tank Id: 1 Tank Status: Currently in Use FRTYPE: Not reported Expiration Date: Not reported Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: 3 Tank Status: Currently in UseFRTYPE: Not reportedExpiration Date: Not reported Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: 2 Tank Status: Currently in UseFRTYPE: Not reportedExpiration Date: Not reported Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: R-2 Tank Status: Permanently Out of UseFRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 09/15/2016 Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: 1Tank Status: Currently in UseFRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 09/15/2016 Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: R-3 Tank Status: Permanently Out of UseFRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 09/15/2016 Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: R-1Tank Status: Permanently Out of UseFRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 09/15/2016 Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: 2 Tank Status: Currently in UseFRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 09/15/2016 Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: 3 Tank Status: Currently in UseFRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 09/15/2016 Alt Facility ID: 9-601320Tank Id: R-4Tank Status: Permanently Out of UseFRTYPE: Insurance EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U001237039 TC5207731.2s Page 25 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site D16 SW 1/4-1/2 0.478mi. DUKE'S SHELL (Continued) Expiration Date: PACIFIC RENT-ALL, INC 1080 KILAUEA AVE HILO, HI 96720 09/15/2016 2523 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D Relative: Higher Actual: 23 ft. 17 SE 1/4-1/2 0.498mi. 2629 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 27 ft. LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: 9-601678Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) 11/07/1995 940099 Roger Brewer 9-601678 MASAMI & MAE M. AITO Not reported Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.712573 Longitude: -155.077293 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAO Horizontal Collection Method Name: Address Matching Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: Tank ID: Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: Substance: AIM HILO 761 KEKUANAOA ST HILO, HI 96720 LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: r-1 04/12/1973Permanently Out of Use 03/04/1994 550 Gasoline r-104/12/1973 Permanently Out of Use 03/04/1994 550 Gasoline 9-601195Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)08/11/2008 050009 Josh Nagashima 9-601195 EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST UST LUST UST Financial Assur ance U001237039 U001237102 NIA U001237016 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 26 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. AIM HILO (Continued) Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: ALOHA PETROLEUM, LTD. 1132 BISHOP STREET, SUITE 1700 Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.711845 Longitude: -155.064567Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: GPS Tank ID: 87a Date Installed: 04/04/1985 Tank Status: Currently in Use Date Closed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 8000 Substance: Gasohol Tank ID: 92 Date Installed: 04/04/1985 Tank Status: Currently in Use Date Closed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 8000 Substance: Gasohol Tank ID: 98b Date Installed: 04/04/1985 Tank Status: Currently in Use Date Closed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 8000 Substance: Gasohol HI Financial Assurance: Alt Facility ID: 9-601195Tank Id: 5Tank Status: To be installedFRTYPE: InsuranceExpiration Date: 04/01/2015 Alt Facility ID: 9-601195Tank Id: 6 Tank Status: To be installedFRTYPE: InsuranceExpiration Date: 04/01/2015 Alt Facility ID: 9-601195Tank Id: 87a Tank Status: Currently in Use FRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 04/01/2015 Alt Facility ID: 9-601195Tank Id: 92 Tank Status: Currently in Use FRTYPE: Insurance Expiration Date: 04/01/2015 Alt Facility ID: 9-601195 EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U001237016 TC5207731.2s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 18 SW 1/2-1 0.524mi. 2766 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 35 ft. AIM HILO (Continued) Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: HILO SHOPPING CENTER 1255 KILAUEA AVE HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: 98b Currently in Use Insurance 04/01/2015 9-6011954To be installedInsurance04/01/2015 Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Hilo Shopping Center HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hilo Shopping Center HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Found: Diesel in soil Nature of Residual Contamination: Petroleum contaminated soil Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 10/03/2005 Document Number: 2005-508-MS Document Subject: NFA for 550-gallon diesel UST Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield U001237016 SHWS S10681n3o SPILLS NIA Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 20040510-1040 HID Number: Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 28 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 19 NW 1/2-1 0.528 mi. 2786 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 4 ft. HILO SHOPPING CENTER (Continued) Facility Registry Id: Lead and Program: ER: Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Not reported HEER EP&R No Hilo Shopping Center non-regulated UST release Diesel Fuel < 25 Gallons Response Liz Galvez Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Shopping Center 19.710069 -155.076339 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 20040510-1040 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: Not reported Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: No Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Shopping Center non-regulated UST release Diesel Fuel < 25 Gallons Response Liz Galvez Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Shopping Center 19.66932 -155.307075 KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON 774 KAMEHAMEHA AVE HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported SHWS LUST UST INST CONTROL SPILLS Financial Assurance Supplemental Location: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE corner Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Bayside Chevron Service HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013783646 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Anna Fernandez Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Bayside Chevron Service HID Number: Not reported S106817730 U001237007 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 29 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) Facility Registry Identifier: 110013783646 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Priority: NFAAssessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Found: TPH-O of 0.736 mg/I in groundwater in MW-3 U001237007 Nature of Residual Contamination: Subsurface soil with TPH-G, UH-d, UH-o and total xylene concentrations exceeding HDOH EALs remains on site 3 feet below the station building. Use Restrictions: Controls Required to Manage Contamination Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: A soil management plan is required. Institutional Control: Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Restricted Use Document Date: 04/27/2007 Document Number: 2007-269-AF Document Subject: No Further Action with Institutional Controls Determination Project Manager: Anna Fernandez Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: 9-601133Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)02/01/1999 970106 Richard Takaba 9-601133Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)04/20/2004 040017 Richard Takaba 9-601133KHI dba Bayside Chevron 774 Kamehameha Ave Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude: 19.721900 Longitude: -155.078450 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: GPS Tank ID: 1 Date Installed: 08/21/1983 Tank Status: Currently In Use Date Closed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 10000 Substance: Gasoline Tank ID: 2 Date Installed: 08/21/1983 Tank Status: Currently In Use Date Closed: Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 30 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) Tank Capacity: 10000 Substance: Gasohol Tank ID: 3 Date Installed: Tank Status: Date Closed: Tank Capacity: 08/21/1983 Currently In Use Not reported 10000 Substance: Tank ID: Date Installed: Gasohol R-00508/20/1969Tank Status: Date Closed: Permanently Out of Use 09/01/1983 Tank Capacity: Substance: Tank ID: Date Installed: 1000 Used Oil R-408/21/1983Tank Status: Date Closed: Permanently Out of Use 04/03/1997 Tank Capacity: 1000 Substance: Used Oil INST CONTROL: Potential hazards and controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Supplemental Location: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE corner Zip Suffix: Not reported Island: Hawaii Institutional Control: HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Supplemental Loe. Text: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE corner Case Number: 20040629-1542 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110013783646 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Bayside Chevron Contaminated Soil Substances: Not reported Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: Not reported Units: Not reported Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Mike Cripps Assignment End Date: 2005-08-30 00:00:00 Result: Refer to ISST File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Island: Chevron Products Company 19.66932 -155.307075 Hawaii EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U001237007 TC5207731.2s Page 31 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M_A_P_F_IN_D_I_N_G_s _____ ___. KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) Supplemental Loe. Text: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE corner Case Number: 20040629-1542 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110013783646 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Bayside Chevron Contaminated Soil Substances: Not reported Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: Not reported Units: Not reported Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Mike Cripps Assignment End Date: 2005-08-30 00:00:00 Result: Refer to ISST File Under: Latitude: Longitude: HI Financial Assurance: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Alt Facility ID: Tank Id: Tank Status: FRTYPE: Expiration Date: Chevron Products Company 19.722126 -155.079456 9-6011331Currently In UseInsurance05/09/2016 9-6011332Currently In UseInsurance05/09/2016 9-6011333Currently In UseInsurance05/09/2016 9-601133R-005Permanently Out of UseInsurance05/09/2016 9-601133R-4Permanently Out of UseInsurance05/09/2016 EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U001237007 TC5207731.2s Page 32 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 20 SE 1/2-1 0.636 mi. 3356 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 29 ft. �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Site Database(s) STATIONERS CORPORATION OF HAWAII 708 KANOELEHUA AVE HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: ESA Limited Phase II Investigation Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Stationers Corporation of Hawaii HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Clarence Calihan Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Stationers Corporation of Hawaii HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Not reported Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNeti�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 12/09/2005 Document Number: 2005-637-CAC Document Subject: Review of the Limited Phase II ESA Project Manager: Clarence Calihan SHWS SPILLS Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: ESA Limited Phase II Investigation Case Number: 20051123-0823 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: Not reported Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: No Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Building Materials Survey -Typewriter Cleaning Station Unknown Not reported Not reported Not reported Response Curtis Martin 2005-11-23 00 :00:00 SOSC NFA Stationers Corporation of Hawaii EDA ID Number EPA ID Number S108009231 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 33 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M_A_P_F_IN_D_I_N_G_s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 21 NE 1/2-1 0.655mi. 3459 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 3 ft. STATIONERS CORPORATION OF HAWAII (Continued) Latitude: 19.66932 Longitude: -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: ESA Limited Phase II Investigation Case Number: 20051123-0823 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: Not reported Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: No Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Building Materials Survey -Typewriter Cleaning Station Unknown Not reported Not reported Not reported Response Curtis Martin 2005-11-23 00 :00:00 SOSC NFA Stationers Corporation of Hawaii 19.709235 -155.064704 HELCO PIPELINE ANOMALY AT NORTHEAST SIDE OF SEASID 126 BANYAN WY HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Seaside Hotel Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: HELCO Shipman Plant Bunker Fuel Line HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Amelia Hicks Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: Island: Hawaii No Hazard SOAR Environmental Interest Name: HELCO Shipman Plant Bunker Fuel Line HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Priority: NFA No Hazard Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Not reported S108009231 SHWS S111677284 SPILLS NIA Nature of Residual Contamination: TPH detected at maximum concentrations of 1,800 mg/kg (below State Unrestricted Tier 2 Environmental Action Levels (HDOH EALs). No indications of leaks or other structural failures along the pipeline Use Restrictions: Engineering Control: Description of Restrictions: and the excavated area was backfilled. No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential Use Not reported Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 34 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HELCO PIPELINE ANOMAL VAT NORTHEAST SIDE OF SEASIDE HOTEL (Continued) S111677284 Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 07/16/2012 Document Number: 2012-433-AH Document Subject: No Further Action Determination for HELCO Shipman Plant Bunker Fuel Line Project Manager: Amelia Hicks Contact Information: (808)586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Seaside Hotel Case Number: 20100323-1647 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: Not reported Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: None Units: HELCO Shipman Plant Bunker Fuel Line Substances: Diesel Fuel Bunker Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: 25 Units: Gallons Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Liz Galvez Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Not reported Not reported Hawaii Electric Light Co., Inc. (HELCO) Not reported Not reported Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Seaside Hotel Case Number: 20100323-1655 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: Not reported Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: None Units: HELCO pipeline anomaly Substances: Bunker and Diesel Less Or Greater Than: < Numerical Quantity: 25 Units: Gallons Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Liz Galvez Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Not reported Not reported Hawaii Electric Light Co., Inc. (HELCO) Not reported Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 35 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 22 WSW 1/2-1 0.683 mi. 3604 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 48 ft. SUN SUN LAU CHOP SUEY HOUSE 1055 KINOOLE ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey House (Report) HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013778279 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey House (Report) HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013778279 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Not reported Nature of Residual Contamination: Petroleum contaminated soil Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNeti�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 04/28/2005 Document Number: 2005-223-MS Document Subject: NFA for diesel UST release Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield SHWS S106820539 SPILLS NIA Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19951212-2 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110013778279 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Sun Sun Lau, Ltd. Substances: Diesel Fuel Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Gallons Response Bill Perry Not reported 150 Not reported Refer to ISST Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey House TC5207731.2s Page 36 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site E23 West 1/2-1 0.717 mi. SUN SUN LAU CHOP SUEY HOUSE (Continued) Latitude: 19.66932 Longitude: -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19951212-2 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110013778279 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Sun Sun Lau, Ltd. Substances: Diesel Fuel Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Gallons Response Bill Perry Not reported 150 Not reported Refer to ISST Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey House 19.712697 -155.081073 HILO QUALITY WASHERETTE 210 HOKU ST HILO, HI 96720 3788 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E Relative: Higher Actual: 58 ft. SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Hilo Quality Washerette HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 1100137867 41 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Eric Sadoyama Hazard Priority: Low Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hilo Quality Washerette HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 1100137867 41 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Priority: Low Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Ongoing Nature of Contamination: Found: Diesel in soil Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Controls Required to Manage Contamination Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S106820539 SHWS 1006820674 INST CONTROL NIA SPILLS Institutional Control: Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Within Designated Areawide ContamiNeti�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 37 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. HILO QUALITY WASHERETTE (Continued) Document Date: Document Number: Document Subject: Project Manager: Not reported Not reported Not reported Eric Sadoyama EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1006820674 Contact Information: (808)586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 INST CONTROL: Potential hazards and controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Supplemental Location: Not reported Zip Suffix: Not reported Island: Hawaii Institutional Control: HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19960110-1425 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 1100137867 41 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: No Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Quality Washerette oil tank leaking diesel #2 Diesel Fuel #2 Gallons Response Not reported Not reported 200 Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Quality Washerette 19.66932 -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19960110-1425 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 1100137867 41 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: No Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Quality Washerette oil tank leaking diesel #2 Diesel Fuel #2 Gallons Response Not reported Not reported 200 Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Quality Washerette 19.715372 -155.08253 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site E24 West 1/2-1 0.760mi. 4011 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 64 ft. HILO QUALITY WASHERETTE (Continued) Case Number: HID Number: Facility Registry Id: Lead and Program: ER: Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: 19960124-0225 Not reported 110013786741 HEER EP&R Not reported Hilo Quality Washerette tank leaking diesel Diesel Fuel Gallons Response Not reported 200 Terry Corpus Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Quality Washerette 19.715372 -155.08253 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19960124-0225 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 1100137867 41 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Hilo Quality Washerette tank leaking diesel Substances: Diesel Fuel Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS 865 KINOOLE ST HILO, HI 96720 Site 2 of 2 in cluster E RCRA-CESQG: Not reported 200 Gallons Response Terry Corpus Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Quality Washerette 19.66932 -155.307075 Date form received by agency: 10/26/1990 Facility name: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS Facility address: 865 KINOOLE ST EPA ID: Mailing address: Contact: Contact address: Contact country: Contact telephone: HILO, HI 96720 HID982436487 KINOOLE ST HILO, HI 96720 RONALD JOHNSON 865 KINOOLE ST HILO, HI 96720 us 808-935-1620 EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1006820674 RCRA-CESQG 1004688848 SHWS HID982436487 SPILLS FINDS ECHO AIRS TC5207731.2s Page 39 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) Contact email: EPA Region: Classification: Description: Owner/Operator Summary: Not reported 09 Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste Owner/operator name: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Not reported 415-555-1212Not reportedNot reportedNot reported Owner Not reported Not reported Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported 415-555-1212Not reported Not reported Not reported Operator Not reported Not reported U.S. importer of hazardous waste:No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No 1004688848 TC5207731.2s Page 40 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) 1004688848 User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: No violations found SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Hilo Quality Cleaners HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110005726526 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Ross Kuge Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hilo Quality Cleaners HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110005726526 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Presumed: Unknown Nature of Residual Contamination: Unknown Use Restrictions: Undetermined Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNeti�orted Site Closure Type: Historic NFA -Incomplete Documentation Document Date: 07/17/1997 Document Number: 1997-250-RK Document Subject: Hazardous Waste Release Response Determination for Hilo Quality Cleaners, Facility at 865 Kinoole St, Hilo HI Project Manager: Ross Kuge Contact Information: (808)586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19971018-1909 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110005726526 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Hilo Quality Cleaners Diesel Spill Substances: Diesel Fuel Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Gallons Not reported 30 TC5207731.2s Page 41 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) Activity Type: Activity Lead: Response Bill Perry Assignment End Date: Result: Not reported SOSC NFA File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Quality Cleaners 19.66932 -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19971018-1909 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110005726526 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Hilo Quality Cleaners Diesel Spill Substances: Diesel Fuel Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Gallons Response Bill Perry Not reported 30 Assignment End Date: Result: Not reported SOSC NFA File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Quality Cleaners 19.715911 -155.082942 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19940111 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110005726526 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Hilo Quality Cleaners oil impacted soils Substances: diesel #6 bunker Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: Not reported Units: Not reported Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Terry Corpus Assignment End Date: Not reported Result: Refer to ISST File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Quality Cleaners 19.66932 -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19940111 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110005726526 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Hilo Quality Cleaners oil impacted soils Substances: diesel #6 bunker EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1004688848 TC5207731.2s Page 42 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Not reported Not reported Not reported Response Terry Corpus Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Quality Cleaners 19.715911 -155.082942 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19950111 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110005726526 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Hilo Quality Cleaners tank removal Substances: Diesel #6 Bunker Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: Not reported Units: Not reported Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Terry Corpus Assignment End Date: Not reported Result: Refer to ISST File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Quality Cleaners 19.715911 -155.082942 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19950111 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110005726526 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Hilo Quality Cleaners tank removal Substances: Diesel #6 Bunker Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: Not reported Units: Not reported Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Terry Corpus Assignment End Date: Not reported Result: Refer to ISST File Under: Latitude: Longitude: FINDS: Registry ID: Hilo Quality Cleaners 19.66932 -155.307075 110005726526 Environmental Interest/Information System EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1004688848 RCRAlnfo is a national information system that supports the Resource TC5207731.2s Page 43 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 25 South 1/2-1 0.774mi. 4086 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 58 ft. HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAlnfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and ECHO: Envid: Registry ID: DFR URL: AIRS: Facility ID: Island: Mailing Address: Locale: Business Phone: corrective action activities required under RCRA. STATE MASTER Click Ibis bitpecliok "llhile viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDA Site Report. 1004688848 110005726526 http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110005726526 0521-01-N Hawaii 865 Kinoole Street Not reported 808-935-1620Mailing City,St,Zip: Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Wayne Tajiri Contact Name: Contact Title: Date Permit Issue: Date Permit Expire: Engineer 05/31/2013 05/30/2018 Description: One (1) 150 hp Superior Boiler Works Boiler and One (1) 200 hp York-Shipley Boiler1. Attachment of this permit encompasses the following equipment and associated appurtenances:a.150 hp Superior Boiler Works Boiler, model no. S12-0-50-RM7840L-F7T-UL-CSD-1, serial no. 13537; andb.200 hp York-Shipley Boiler, series 564, serial no. 02-21314H-14833. HILO SODA WORKS 270 E KAWILI ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Hilo Soda Works Tank Closure HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013786803 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Unassigned Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hilo Soda Works Tank Closure HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013786803 SHWS LUST UST 1004688848 U003155315 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 44 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HILO SODA WORKS (Continued) Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Not reported Nature of Residual Contamination: Diesel and Gasoline USTs Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 09/15/1997 Document Number: 1997-340-RK Document Subject: NFA for Hilo Soda Works site Project Manager: Unassigned Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Status Date: Release ID: Project Officer: UST: Facility ID: Owner: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: Latitude: 9-603256Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)07/31/1997 970025 Jose Ruiz 9-603256HILO SODA WORKS 145 KEOULA ST Hilo, 96720 96720 19.705588 Longitude: -155.068516 Horizontal Reference Datum Name: NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name: Address Matching Tank ID: R-1Date Installed: 01/01/1970Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 12/04/1996 Tank Capacity: 550 Substance: Diesel Tank ID: R-2Date Installed: 01/01/1964Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Date Closed: 12/04/1996 Tank Capacity: 550 Substance: Gasoline U003155315 TC5207731.2s Page 45 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 26 WNW 1/2-1 0.835 mi. 4407ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 25 ft. �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Site HATADA BAKERY (FORMER) 55 KUKUAU ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Hatada Bakery, Former HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013789258 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Hazard Priority: Low Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hatada Bakery, Former HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013789258 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Priority: Low Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Ongoing Database(s) SHWS INST CONTROL SPILLS EDA ID Number EPA ID Number S106817321 NIA Nature of Contamination: Found: Soil-TPH-D, acenaphthene, fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene. watersheen and petroleum odor, benzene, acenaphthene, naphthalene, benzo[a]pyrene Nature of Residual Contamination: TPH-D, acenaphthene, floranthene, naphthalene and possibly Use Restrictions: Engineering Control: Description of Restrictions: benzo[a]pyrene in soil and possibly groundwater Controls Required to Manage Contamination Not reported Based on the site's tight working conditions, further site investigation is limited until demolition of the building or redevelopment of the property. Must resample when site is redeveloped. Institutional Control: Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported Document Date: Not reported Document Number: Not reported Document Subject: Not reported Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 INST CONTROL: Potential hazards and controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Supplemental Location: Not reported Zip Suffix: Not reported Island: Hawaii Institutional Control: HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19990108-1422 HID Number: Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 46 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M_A_P_F_IN_D_I_N_G_s _____ ___. Elevation Site 27 West 1/2-1 0.863 mi. 4558 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 39 ft. HATADA BAKERY (FORMER) (Continued) Facility Registry Id: Lead and Program: ER: Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: 110013789258 HEER EP&R Not reported Heating Oil Tank, Hatada Bakery Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Response Terry Corpus Not reported Refer to ISST Hatada Bakery 19.719821 -155.084015 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19990108-1422 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: 110013789258 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: Heating Oil Tank, Hatada Bakery Substances: Not reported Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: Not reported Units: Not reported Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Terry Corpus Assignment End Date: Not reported Result: Refer to ISST File Under: Latitude: Longitude: HILO MACARONI FACTORY 639 KINOOLE ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Hatada Bakery 19.66932 -155.307075 Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Hilo Macaroni Factory HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hilo Macaroni Factory HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S106817321 SHWS S10681TT24 SPILLS NIA TC5207731.2s Page 47 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M_A_P_F_IN_D_I_N_G_s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HILO MACARONI FACTORY (Continued) Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Found: Diesel Nature of Residual Contamination: Petroleum contaminated soil Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 04/22/2004 Document Number: 2004-178-MS Document Subject: Review of Underground Storage Tank Closure Report, Former Hilo Macaroni Factory Ltd, Mar 2004 Project Manager: Mark Sutterfield Contact Information: HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii (808)586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 20030918-1149 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: Not reported Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: 1,000 gal diesel tank removal Substances: Diesel Fuel Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Unknown Response Mike Cripps Not reported Not reported Assignment End Date: Result: Not reported SOSC NFA File Under: Latitude: Hilo Macaroni Factory Ltd 19.66932 Longitude: -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 20030918-1149 HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Id: Not reported Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Not reported Units: 1,000 gal diesel tank removal Substances: Diesel Fuel Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: Unknown Response Mike Cripps Not reported Not reported Not reported SOSC NFA S106817724 TC5207731.2s Page 48 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. Elevation Site EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 28 ENE 1/2-1 0.866 mi. 4575 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 18 ft. HILO MACARONI FACTORY (Continued) File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Macaroni Factory Ltd 19.718997 -155.0849 WOOD PROTECTION COMPANY (HPM BUILDING SUPPLY) 150 KEAA ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: HPM Building Supply OBA-Hawaii Wood Protection, Inc. HID Number: HID981164254 Facility Registry Identifier: 110002148658 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: John Peard Hazard Priority: Low Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Present Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: HPM Building Supply OBA-Hawaii Wood Protection, Inc. HID Number: HID981164254 Facility Registry Identifier: 110002148658 Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Present Priority: Low Assessment: Assessment Ongoing Response: Not reported Nature of Contamination: Presumed: Copper, chromium and arsenic in soil. Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Controls Required to Manage Contamination Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported Document Date: Not reported Document Number: Not reported Document Subject: Not reported Project Manager: John Peard S106817724 SHWS S104657437 SPILLS NIA Contact Information: (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,HI 96720 HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19900722 HID Number: HID981164254 Facility Registry Id: 110002148658 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Yes Units: HPM Building Supply (Wood Protection Co.) Substances: Chromated Copper Arsenate Less Or Greater Than: Not reported TC5207731.2s Page 49 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M_A_P_F_IN_D_I_N_G_s _____ ___. Elevation Site 29 SSE 1/2-1 0.881 mi. 4651 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 62 ft. WOOD PROTECTION COMPANY (HPM BUILDING SUPPL V) (Continued) Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: 4000 Gallons Response Mike Cripps Not reported Refer to SOAR HPM Building Supply 19.66932 -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19900722 HID Number: HID981164254 Facility Registry Id: 110002148658 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Yes Units: HPM Building Supply (Wood Protection Co.) Substances: Chromated Copper Arsenate Less Or Greater Than: Not reported Numerical Quantity: 4000 Units: Gallons Activity Type: Response Activity Lead: Mike Cripps Assignment End Date: Not reported Result: Refer to SOAR File Under: HPM Building Supply Latitude: 19.724579 Longitude: -155.058813 HILO MECHANICAL, INC 50 HOLOMUA ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Hilo Mechanical, Inc. HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013786778 Lead Agency: Not reported Program: State Project Manager: Unassigned Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hilo Mechanical, Inc. HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: 110013786778 Lead Agency: Not reported Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Priority: NFA Assessment: Assessment Ongoing Response: Not reported Nature of Contamination: Not reported EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S104657437 SHWS 1006820676 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 50 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. HILO MECHANICAL, INC (Continued) Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Undetermined Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action -Type Undetermined Document Date: 03/23/1995 Document Number: Document Subject: Project Manager: Not reported Not reported Unassigned EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1006820676 Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 30 WNW 1/2-1 0.892 mi. 4708 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 11 ft. 31 South 1/2-1 0.892 mi. 4712 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 46 ft. HILO GAS COMPANY LTD 51-53 PONAHAWAI ST HILO, HI 96720 Manufactured Gas Plants: No additional information available USDA FOREST SERVICE PSW EXPERIMENTAL STATION 1643 KILAUEA AVE HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: PSW Experimental Station Kawili St & Kilauea Ave Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: USDA Forest Service PSW Experimental Station HID Number: HI0122390008 Facility Registry Identifier: 110013772845 Lead Agency: EPA Program: State Project Manager: Unassigned Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: No Hazard Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: USDA Forest Service PSW Experimental Station HID Number: HI0122390008 Facility Registry Identifier: 110013772845 Lead Agency: EPA Potential Hazard And Controls: No Hazard Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Not reported Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential Use Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported EDA MGP 1008409004 NIA SHWS 1006819479 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 51 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 32 SSE 1/2-1 0.926 mi. 4887ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 53 ft. USDA FOREST SERVICE PSW EXPERIMENTAL STATION (Continued) Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: No Further Action Letter -Unrestricted Residential Use Document Date: 03/08/1986 Document Number: Not reported 1006819479 Document Subject: Project Manager: PA, Review, USDA Forest Service PSE Experimental Station Unassigned Contact Information: (808)586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 HAWAII PEST CONTROL 56 WIWOOLE ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Unit A Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: HID Number: Hawaii Pest Control HI0000603266 Facility Registry Identifier: 110013789132 Lead Agency: HEER Program: State Project Manager: John Peard Hazard Priority: Medium Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Present Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hawaii Pest Control HID Number: HI0000603266 Facility Registry Identifier: Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Priority: Medium 110013789132 Hazard Present Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Ongoing Nature of Contamination: Found: Organochlorine pesticides. Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Controls Required to Manage Contamination Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported Document Date: Not reported Document Number: Not reported Document Subject: Not reported Project Manager: John Peard SHWS 1006820888 NIA Contact Information: (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,HI 96720 TC5207731.2s Page 52 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G_s _____ ___. Elevation Site 33 SSE 1/2-1 0.937mi. 4946 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 66 ft. KANOELEHUA INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE 20 POOKELA ST HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Kanoelehua Industrial Warehouse Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: Kanoelehua Industrial Warehouse HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Program: Brownfields Project Manager: Unassigned Hazard Priority: Low Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Kanoelehua Industrial Warehouse HID Number: Not reported Facility Registry Identifier: Not reported Lead Agency: HEER Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Undetermined Priority: Low Assessment: Assessment Ongoing Response: Not reported Nature of Contamination: Not reported Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reported Use Restrictions: Undetermined Engineering Control: Not reported Description of Restrictions: Not reported Institutional Control: Not reported Within Designated Areawide ContamiNeti�orted Site Closure Type: Not reported Document Date: Not reported Document Number: Not reported Document Subject: Not reported Project Manager: Unassigned EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SHWS S110061615 BROWNFIELDS NIA Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 34 WNW 1/2-1 0.954mi. 5037ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 13 ft. BROWN FIELDS: Program: Brownfields Supplemental Location: Kanoelehua Industrial Warehouse Island: Hawaii Zip Suffix: Not reported HILO ARSENIC 338 LILIUOKALANI LN HILO, HI 96720 SHWS: Organization: Not reported Supplemental Location: Not reported Island: Hawaii Environmental Interest: HID Number: Hilo Arsenic Spill Site HI0001290816 SHWS ENG CONTROLS INST CONTROL SPILLS S108008859 NIA TC5207731.2s Page 53 Map ID Direction Distance �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. EDA ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HILO ARSENIC (Continued) Facility Registry Identifier: 110009278824 Lead Agency: EPA Program: Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Project Manager: Laura Young Hazard Priority: NFA Potential Hazards And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Island: Hawaii SOAR Environmental Interest Name: Hilo Arsenic Spill Site HID Number: HI0001290816 Facility Registry Identifier: 110009278824 Lead Agency: EPA Potential Hazard And Controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Priority: NFA Assessment: Response Necessary Response: Response Complete Nature of Contamination: Found: Arsenic in soil. Contaminated soil bound in concrete slab on site. Nature of Residual Contamination: Arsenic in soil. First 12-18 inches bound in concrete. Use Restrictions: Engineering Control: Description of Restrictions: Controls Required to Manage Contamination Engineering Control Required Prohibit Any Activity That May Disturb the Integrity of the Capping System Institutional Control: Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Within Designated Areawide ContamiNati�orted Site Closure Type: Historic NFA -Restricted Use Document Date: 09/04/1997 Document Number: 1997-326-L Y Document Subject: NFA letter for Hilo Arsenic Site Project Manager: Laura Young Contact Information: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782 ENG CONTROLS: Supplemental Location Text: Not reported Zip Suffix: Not reported Island: Hawaii Potential Hazards And Controls: Engineering Control: INST CONTROL: Hazard Managed With Controls Engineering Control Required Potential hazards and controls: Hazard Managed With Controls Supplemental Location: Not reported Zip Suffix: Not reported Island: Hawaii Institutional Control: HI SPILLS: Island: Hawaii Government -Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter Issued Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19950509 HID Number: HI0001290816 Facility Registry Id: 110009278824 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Yes Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Hilo Arsenic Sodium Arsenate, lead and cadmium Not reported S108008859 TC5207731.2s Page 54 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site �.__ ______ M _A _P _F _IN_D_I _N _G _s _____ ___. HILO ARSENIC (Continued) Numerical Quantity: 30 Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Gallons Response Mike Cripps Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Arsenic 19.66932 -155.307075 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19950509 HID Number: HI0001290816 Facility Registry Id: 110009278824 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Yes Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Arsenic Sodium Arsenate, lead and cadmium Not reported Gallons Response Mike Cripps 30 Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Arsenic 19.7204 -155.08506 Island: Hawaii Supplemental Loe. Text: Not reported Case Number: 19950509 HID Number: HI0001290816 Facility Registry Id: 110009278824 Lead and Program: HEER EP&R ER: Yes Units: Substances: Less Or Greater Than: Numerical Quantity: Units: Activity Type: Activity Lead: Assignment End Date: Result: File Under: Latitude: Longitude: Hilo Arsenic Sodium Arsenate, lead and cadmium Not reported Gallons Response Mike Cripps 30 Not reported Refer to ISST Hilo Arsenic 19.719482 -155.084692 EDA ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S108008859 TC5207731.2s Page 55 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Number of Days to Update: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Federal CERCLIS list Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSO facilities list Federal RCRA generators list GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls engineering controls registries GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list State-and tribal equivalent CERCLIS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists State and tribal leaking storage tank lists GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal registered storage tank lists GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal institutional control engineering control registries GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN INDIAN State and tribal Brownfields sites ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Landfill I Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDA: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDA Contact: 01/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDA Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDA: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 ODI: Open Dump Inventory Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDA Contact: 01/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDA Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDA: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDA Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDA Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: No Update Planned A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDA: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDA Contact: 02/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDA Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste I Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDA: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 CDL: Clandestine Drug Lab Listing A listing of clandestine drug lab site locations. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDA: 09/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2010 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDA Contact: 02/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDA Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4249 Last EDA Contact: 02/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDA Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5207731.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Land Records Records of Emergency Release Reports Other Ascertainable Records GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 53 AIRS: List of Permitted Facilities A listing of permitted facilities in the state. Date of Government Version: 01/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4200 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Permitted Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of permitted drycleaner facilities in the state. Date of Government Version: 01/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4200 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 12/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing A listing of underground injection well locations. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2013 Number of Days to Update: 56 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4226 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4258 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/ADate Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/ANumber of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5207731.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/ADate Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: NIA Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: NIA Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii. Date of Government Version: N/ADate Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 191 Source: Department of Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 200 Source: Department of Health Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii. TC5207731.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 186 OTHER DATABASE(S) Source: Department of Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: Varies Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities -schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes -where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates FloodInsurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and 03 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 TC5207731.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION GEOCHECK ®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS 525 PIILANI STREET 525 PIILANI STREET HILO, HI 96720 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Version Date: 19.71721 -19° 43' 1.96" 155.070996 -155° 4' 15.59" Zone 5 282938.7 2181382.2 12 ft. above sea level 5949390 HILO, HI 2013 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1.Groundwater flow direction, and2.Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC5207731.2s Page A-1 GEOCHECKID -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES North West Target Property Elevation: 12 ft. TP TP South East GEOCHECKID -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION FEMA FLOOD ZONE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW® GEOCHECKID -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION NIA *Target PropertyN SSURGO SoilN Water SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo HI 96720 LAT/LONG: 19.71721 / 155.070996 SSURGO SOIL MAP - 5207731.2s 1/16 lffl l/4Mil� CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC CONTACT: Kama INQUIRY#: 5207731.2s DATE: March 05, 2018 1 :00 pm Copyright© 2018 EDR, Inc.© 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015. GEOCHECKID -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Keaukaha muck Hydrologic Group: Class D -Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Partially hydric Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: Depth to Watertable Min: > O inches > O inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity micro m/sec 1 0inches ?inches muck A-8 Highly organic Max: 141 soils, Peat. Min: 42.34 2 ?inches 18 inches bedrock Not reported Not reported Max: 0.42 Min: 0.02 LOCAL/ REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDA Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE Federal USGS Federal FROS PWS State Database SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) 1.000 Nearest PWS within 0.001 miles 1.000 TC5207731.2s Page A-6 Soil Reaction (pH) Max: Min: Max: Min: GEOCHECKID -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION FEDERAL FROS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -5207731.2s N County Boundary N Major Roads N Contour Lines Airports @ Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater @ WaterWells ® Public Water Supply Wells • Cluster of Multiple Icons SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo HI 96720 LAT/LONG: 19.71721 / 155.070996 1/4 1/2 1 Miles ♦Groundwater Flow Direction � Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location � Groundwater Flow Varies at Location CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC CONTACT: Kama INQUIRY#: 5207731.2s DATE: March 05, 2018 1 :00 pm Copyright© 2018 EDR, Inc.© 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015. GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation A1 SSW 1/4-1/2 Mile Higher Org. Identifier: USGS-HI Formal name: Manioc Identifier: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194258155043401 Manioc name: Manioc type: Manioc desc: Hue code: 8-4204-01 WAIAKEA VILLAGEWell Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.073342Horiz Ace measure: 1 Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure units: feet Vert accmeasure units: feet Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: Horiz Ace measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val: Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: HILOCAL Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19710101 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth units: ft Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 A2 SSW 1/4-1/2 Mile Higher Wid: Well name: Yr drilled: Driller: Quad map: Long83dd: Lat83dd: Gps: Owner user: Land owner: Pump insta: Old number: Casing dia: Well depth: Solid case: Use: Use year: lnit head: lnit head3: lnit cl: Test date: 8-4204-001Waiakea Village1971Roscoe Moss Hawaii Inc67-155.07333319.713056 0 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 14 35 25 IND -Industrial Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 0 Not Reported Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Island: Old name: Utm: Well type: Ground el: Perl case: lnit head2: Test gpm: Database FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.7130724 24000 seconds 15.00 5 us 35 35 HI WELLS Hawaii Not Reported -1 PER Not Reported 35 Not Reported 1250 EDA ID Number USGS40000268579 Hl9000000004305 TC5207731.2s Page A-9 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Test ddown: 2.4 Test chlor: Not Reported Test temp: Not Reported Test unit: Not Reported Pump gpm: 700 Draft mgy: Not Reported Head feet: Not Reported Max chlor: Not Reported Min chlor: Not Reported Geology: QKL Pump yr: 0 Draft yr: Not Reported Bot hole: Not Reported Bot solid: Not Reported Bot perf: Not Reported Spec capac: 521 Pump mgd: 1.008 Draft mgd: Not Reported Pump elev: Not Reported Pump depth: Not Reported Tmk: Not Reported Aqui code: 80401 Latest hd: Not Reported Wcr: 06-AUG-71 Pir: Not Reported Surveyor: Not Reported T: Not Reported Site id: Hl9000000004305 B3 NNE HI WELLS Hl9000000004317 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Wid: 8-4304-002 Island: Hawaii Well name: Shipman 2 Old name: Not Reported Yr drilled: 1957 Driller: Bechtel Quad map: 67 Long83dd: -155.068889 Lat83dd: 19.723889 Gps: 0 Utm: -1 Owner user: Hawaii Electric Light Co., Inc., HELCO Land owner: Not Reported Pump insta: Not Reported Old number: Not Reported Well type: DUG Casing dia: 84 Ground el: 10 Well depth: 26 Solid case: Not Reported Perf case: Not Reported Use: UNU -Unused Use year: Not Reported lnit head: Not Reported lnit head2: Not Reported lnit head3: Not Reported lnit cl: 0 Test date: Not Reported Test gpm: Not Reported Test ddown: Not Reported Test chlor: Not Reported Test temp: Not Reported Test unit: Not Reported Pump gpm: 6600 Draft mgy: Not Reported Head feet: Not Reported Max chlor: Not Reported Min chlor: Not Reported Geology: QKL Pump yr: 0 Draft yr: Not Reported Bot hole: -16 Bot solid: Not Reported Bot perf: Not Reported Spec capac: Not Reported TC5207731.2s Page A-10 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pump mgd: 9.504 Draft mgd: Not Reported Pump elev: Not Reported Pump depth: Not Reported Tmk: (3)2-1-001 :024 Aqui code: 80401 Latest hd: Not Reported Wcr: 01-JAN-57 Pir: Not Reported Surveyor: Not Reported T: Not Reported Site id: Hl9000000004317 B4 NNE HI WELLS Hl9000000004316 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Wid: 8-4304-001 Island: Hawaii Well name: Shipman 1 A 1 B Old name: Not Reported Yr drilled: 1943 Driller: Bechtel Quad map: 67 Long83dd: -155.068889 Lat83dd: 19.723889 Gps: 0 Utm: -1 Owner user: Hawaii Electric Light Co., Inc., HELCO Land owner: Not Reported Pump insta: Not Reported Old number: Not Reported Well type: Not Reported Casing dia: 54 Ground el: 12 Well depth: 20 Solid case: Not Reported Perl case: Not Reported Use: IND -Geothermal, Thermoelectric Cooling, Power De Use year: Not Reported lnit head: Not Reported lnit head2: Not Reported lnit head3: Not Reported lnit cl: 0 Test date: Not Reported Test gpm: Not Reported Test ddown: Not Reported Test chlor: Not Reported Test temp: Not Reported Test unit: Not Reported Pump gpm: 5400 Draft mgy: Not Reported Head feet: Not Reported Max chlor: Not Reported Min chlor: Not Reported Geology: Not Reported Pump yr: 0 Draft yr: Not Reported Bot hole: -8 Bot solid: Not Reported Bot per!: Not Reported Spec capac: Not Reported Pump mgd: 7.776 Draft mgd: Not Reported Pump elev: Not Reported Pump depth: Not Reported Tmk: (3)2-1-001 :024 Aqui code: 80401 Latest hd: Not Reported Wcr: 01-JAN-43 Pir: Not Reported Surveyor: Not Reported T: Not Reported Site id: Hl9000000004316 TC5207731.2s Page A-11 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation BS NNE 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Wid: Well name: Yr drilled: Driller: Quad map: Long83dd: Lat83dd: Gps: Owner user: Land owner: Pump insta: Old number: Casing dia: Well depth: Solid case: Use: Use year: lnit head: lnit head3: lnit cl: Test date: Test ddown: Test temp: Pump gpm: Draft mgy: Max chlor: Geology: Pump yr: Draft yr: Bot solid: Spec capac: Pump mgd: Draft mgd: Pump depth: Aqui code: Latest hd: Pir: Surveyor: T: B6 NNE 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Wid: Well name: Yr drilled: Driller: Quad map: Long83dd: Lat83dd: Gps: Owner user: Land owner: GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 8-4304-004 Shipman 4A 4B 1970 Not Reported 67 -155.068889 19.723889 Island: Old name: O Utm: Hawaii Electric Light Co., Inc., HELCO Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Well type: Not Reported Ground el: 20 Not Reported Perl case: IND -Geothermal, Thermoelectric Cooling, Power De Not Reported Not Reported lnit head2: Not Reported 19000 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 8800 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 0 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 12.672 Not Reported Not Reported 80401 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 8-4304-003 Shipman 3 1971 Bechtel 67 -155.068889 19.723889 Test gpm: Test chlor: Test unit: Head feet: Min chlor: Bot hole: Bot per!: Pump elev: Tmk: Wcr: Site id: Island: Old name: 0 Utm: Hawaii Electric Light Co., Inc., HELCO Not Reported Database HI WELLS Hawaii Not Reported -1 DUG 10 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported -10 Not Reported Not Reported (3)2-1-001 :024 01-JAN-70 H 19000000004319 HI WELLS Hawaii Not Reported -1 EDA ID Number Hl9000000004319 Hl9000000004318 TC5207731.2s Page A-12 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pump insta: Not Reported Old number: Not Reported Well type: Casing dia: Not Reported Ground el: Well depth: 20 Solid case: Not Reported Perl case: Use: IND -Geothermal, Thermoelectric Cooling, Power De Use year: lnit head: lnit head3: lnit cl: Test date: Test ddown: Test temp: Pump gpm: Draft mgy: Max chlor: Geology: Pump yr: Draft yr: Bot solid: Spec capac: Pump mgd: Draft mgd: Pump depth: Aqui code: Latest hd: Pir: Surveyor: T: B7 NNE 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: Not Reported Not Reported lnit head2: Not Reported 10000 Not Reported Test gpm: Not Reported Test chlor: Not Reported Test unit: 6600 Not Reported Head feet: Not Reported Min chlor: QKL 0 Not Reported Bot hole: Not Reported Bot per!: Not Reported 9.504 Not Reported Pump elev: Not Reported Tmk: 80401 Not Reported Wcr: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Site id: USGS-HI Formal name: Monloc Identifier: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194337155041602 Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Hue code: 8-4304.01 B -04Well Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.0688978 Horiz Ace measure: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: NAD83 feet feet Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: Horiz Ace measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val: Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: HI LOCAL Countrycode: Not Reported Not Reported DUG 10 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported -10Not Reported Not Reported (3)2-1-001 :024 01-JAN-71 Hl9000000004318 FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.7239051 24000 seconds 8.00 3 us USGS40000268588 TC5207731.2s Page A-13 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported 19710101 ft ft Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 B8 NNE 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: USGS-HI Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194337155041801 Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Hue code: 8-4304-01 WAIAKEA DUG WELLWell Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.0688978Horiz Ace measure: 5 Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure units: feet Vert accmeasure units: feet Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: Horiz Ace measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val: Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: HILOCAL Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19440101 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth units: ft Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface 1972-04-05 12.47 B9 NNE 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: Sealevel USGS-HI Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194337155041802 8-4304.01AMonloc type: Monloc desc: Hue code: Well Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.0688978 Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: 16 16 FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.7239051 24000 seconds 12.00 2 us 20 20 FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.7239051 24000 USGS40000268590 USGS40000268591 TC5207731.2s Page A-14 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Ace measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Interpolated from map NAD83 feet feet Horiz Ace measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val: Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: HI LOCAL Countrycode: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 19700101 Not Reported Not Reported Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: O B10 NNE 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: USGS-HI Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194337155041701 Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Hue code: 8-4304-02 WAIAKEA DUG WELLWell Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.06862 Horiz Ace measure: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: NAD83 feet feet Level or other surveying method HILOCAL Hawaii volcanic-rock aquifers Not Reported Not Reported 19530101 ft ft Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 B11 NNE 1/4-1/2 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: USGS-HI Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: Horiz Ace measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val: Countrycode: Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194337155041601 Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Hue code: 8-4304-03 WAIAKEAWell Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.0683422 Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: seconds 8.00 us Not Reported Not Reported FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.7239052 24000 seconds 10.20 .1 us 20 20 FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.7239052 24000 USGS40000268589 USGS40000268587 TC5207731.2s Page A-15 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Ace measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: Interpolated from map NAD83 feet feet Level or other surveying method HILOCAL Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 19570101 ft ft Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: O 12 NE 1/2-1 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: USGS-HI Horiz Ace measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val: Countrycode: Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194334155035801 Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Hue code: 8-4303.02Well Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.0633422 Horiz Ace measure: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: NAD83 feet feet Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: Horiz Ace measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val: Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: HI LOCAL Countrycode: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 13 East 1/2-1 Mile Higher Org. Identifier: USGS-HI Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: USGS Hawaii Water Science Center USGS-194317155034601 Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Hue code: 8-4303.01Well Not Reported 20010000 Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Longitude: -155.0600088 Drainagearea value: Contrib drainagearea: Latitude: Sourcemap scale: seconds 10.20 .1 us 25.5 25.5 FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.7230719 24000 seconds 10.00 us Not Reported Not Reported FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 19.71835 24000 USGS40000268586 USGS40000268582 TC5207731.2s Page A-16 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Ace measure: 5 Horiz Ace measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 20.00 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 5 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: HILOCAL Countrycode: us Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: O C14 SE HI WELLS Hl9000000004300 1/2-1 Mile Higher Wid: 8-4203-013 Island: Hawaii Well name: Glover Quarry A Old name: Not Reported Yr drilled: 1948Driller: Jas. W. Glover, Ltd.Quad map: 67Long83dd: -155.059444Lat83dd: 19.709167Gps: 0 Utm: -1Owner user: Jas. W. Glover, Ltd.Land owner: Not ReportedPump insta: Not ReportedOld number: Not Reported Well type: DUG Casing dia: 72 Ground el: 23 Well depth: 25Solid case: Not Reported Perl case: Not Reported Use: IND -Mining, Dust ControlUse year: Not Reportedlnit head: Not Reported lnit head2: Not Reported lnit head3: Not Reportedlnit cl: 0Test date: Not Reported Test gpm: Not Reported Test ddown: Not Reported Test chlor: Not Reported Test temp: Not Reported Test unit: Not Reported Pump gpm: 600Draft mgy: Not Reported Head feet: Not Reported Max chlor: Not Reported Min chlor: Not Reported Geology: Not ReportedPump yr: 1984Draft yr: Not Reported Bot hole: -2Bot solid: Not Reported Bot pert: Not Reported Spec capac: Not Reported Pump mgd: .864 Draft mgd: Not Reported Pump elev: Not Reported Pump depth: Not Reported Tmk: Not Reported Aqui code: 80401 Latest hd: Not Reported Wcr: 01-JAN-48Pir: Not ReportedSurveyor: Not Reported T: Not Reported Site id: Hl9000000004300 TC5207731.2s Page A-17 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDA ID Number C15 SE HI WELLS Hl9000000004301 1/2-1 Mile Higher Wid: 8-4203-014 Island: Hawaii Well name: Glover Quarry B Old name: Not Reported Yr drilled: 1948Driller: Jas. W. Glover, Ltd.Quad map: 67Long83dd: -155.058889Lat83dd: 19.709444Gps: 0 Utm: -1Owner user: Jas. W. Glover, Ltd.Land owner: Not ReportedPump insta: Not ReportedOld number: Not Reported Well type: DUG Casing dia: 72 Ground el: 23 Well depth: 25Solid case: Not Reported Perl case: Not Reported Use: IND -Mining, Dust ControlUse year: Not Reportedlnit head: Not Reported lnit head2: Not Reported lnit head3: Not Reportedlnit cl: 0Test date: Not Reported Test gpm: Not Reported Test ddown: Not Reported Test chlor: Not Reported Test temp: Not Reported Test unit: Not Reported Pump gpm: 350Draft mgy: Not Reported Head feet: Not Reported Max chlor: Not Reported Min chlor: Not Reported Geology: Not ReportedPump yr: 1984Draft yr: Not Reported Bot hole: -2Bot solid: Not Reported Bot per!: Not ReportedSpec capac: Not ReportedPump mgd: .504Draft mgd: Not Reported Pump elev: Not Reported Pump depth: Not Reported Tmk: Not Reported Aqui code: 80401Latest hd: Not Reported Wcr: 01-JAN-48 Pir: Not ReportedSurveyor: Not Reported T: Not Reported Site id: H 19000000004301 TC5207731.2s Page A-18 GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION Federal EPA Radon Zone for HAWAII County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level> 4 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 96720 Number of sites tested: 43 Area Living Area -1st Floor Living Area -2nd Floor Basement Average Activity -0.112 pCi/LNot Reported-0.106 pCi/L %<4 pCi/L 100% Not Reported 100% %4-20 pCi/L 0% Not Reported 0% %>20 pCi/L 0% Not Reported 0% TC5207731.2s Page A-19 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1 :24,000-and 1 :25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates FloodInsurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and 03 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Office of Planning Telephone: 808-587-2895 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLowR Information SystemSource: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1 :2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS -11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1 :12,000 to 1 :63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5207731.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL/ REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION 525 Piilani Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 5207731.9 March 05, 2018 EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Site Name: Client Name: Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONL V. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice 5207731 -9 page 2 �EDR YEAR: _1'-"9=9=-2 ____ _ =500' �EDR YEAR: _1'-"9=8,,,_8 ____ _ �EDR YEAR: _1.,_,9=8=5 ____ _ =500' �EDR YEAR: _1'""'9-'--'77'------ = 500' �EDR YEAR: _1.,_,9'--'-7=5 ____ _ @1EDR=1000' �· =500' �EDR 525 Piilani Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 5207731.4 March 05, 2018 with QuadMatch ™ 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www .edrnet.com EDR Historical Topo Map Report 03/05/18 Site Name: 525 Piilani Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 EDR Inquiry# 5207731.4 Client Name: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC P.O. Box 1018 Kamuela, HI 96743 Contact: Kama EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC were identified for the years listed below. EDR's Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. Search Results: Coordinates: P.O.#NA Latitude: 19.71721 19° 43' 2" North Project: NA Longitude: -155.070996 -155° 4' 16" West Maps Provided: 2013 1995 1981 1980 1963 1932 1917 1914 UTMZone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice Zone 5 North 282942.00 2181512.15 11.97' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. All RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5207731 - 4 page 2 Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 2013 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 1995 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1995 1981 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1977 1980 Source Sheets HILO 15-minute, 50000 5207731 - 4 page 3 Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 1963 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1961 1932 Source Sheets I Hilo 15-minute, 62500 1917 Source Sheets Hilo 15-minute, 62500 1914 Source Sheets ,,. .. ;�!,":.; .. ��-r:���. • �:�i�;:·:�,��?-�-•• ., ... �;-�-F •: WAIAKEA 7.5-minute, 31680 5207731 - 4 page 4 �EDR" This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N SW S NE TP, Hilo, 2013, 7.5-minute E SE Historical Topo Map I 2013 Hilo Ray Lili'uokalani Gardens Pier Pier Number Number Three P11hiBay Kilhi6 Bay Ra Kau/a'intii-.•fi Island Kii.hio Hilo p 10 Bay llarbor }fay c5conutIsland Banyan 1'.owa Golf � o MokwWa \ Course,,....---Mokaoku Wa'ilwm1� ·-k t ReedsPonli a'.a ea � Bay 'i__} Pemnsula; KUAWA ST Bakers �jBeach _a_) ,,,,,.:.c it>'-�t11 KAMEHAMEHA AV --� t;; K � /\ �---l-..J �---+----+---ft--1----, "' .., E KAW/LI ST E MAKAALA ST t;; ::, :x: Q ::, :x: o Miles 0.25 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1.5 page 5 �EDR" This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N SW S NE TP, Hilo, 1995, 7.5-minute E SE Historical Topo Map o Miles 0.25 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 F CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1995 1.5 page 6 �EDR" AKU lealea Pt o> .......... This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N SW S NE TP, Hilo, 1981, 7.5-minute E SE Historical Topo Map I 30 Kaulainaiwi0,' lslandU. ,.. ,. JG Bay •g JO • ··�. • "°'· t 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 ■ BM 8 CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1981 1.5 page 7 �EDR" This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N NE SW S SE TP, HILO, 1980, 15-minute E Historical Topo Map 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1980 1.5 page 8 �EDR"Historical Topo Map 1963 lal ... ��f ,,:,,� .... ,, " I I/ Ii Ii ).� Waiak - r-� ..,�Reser ,, \\' * 4"' 40 -'o l L 0 t1 21 Wa . IS � I ..----LJ_ . . . This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N SW S NE TP, Hilo, 1963, 7.5-minute E SE 18 I 42 Kaulainaiwfl\' lslandU.* J,. .. JO JO ) .,.. �'====·-�--l o Miles 0.25 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1.5 page 9 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N SW S NE TP, Hilo, 1932, 15-minute E SE Historical Topo Map o Miles 0.25 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 • w CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1932 1.5 page 10 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N NE E SW S SE TP, Hilo, 1917, 15-minute Historical Topo Map o Miles 0.25 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 • CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1917 1.5 page 11 �EDR"Historical Topo Map HI O BAY This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). w NW N NE SW S SE TP, WAIAKEA, 1914, 7.5-minute E Mokuola . ..._. Cocoanut Island •' .. . • . f .. \ •E Wat... .. I 0 Miles 0.25 l 0.5 SITE NAME: 525 Piilani Street ADDRESS: 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 CLIENT: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 5207731 - 4 1914 1.5 page 12 525 Piilani Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 5207731.3 March 05, 2018 Certified Sanborn® Map Report 03/05/18 Site Name: 525 Piilani Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo, Hl96720 EDR Inquiry# 5207731.3 Client Name: Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC P.O. Box 1018 Kamuela, HI 96743 Contact: Kama �EDR' The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Certification # PO# Project Maps Provided: 1991 1987 1978 1974 1957 1921 9DEA-4820-AB9F NA NA Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® library search results Certification #: 9DEA-4B20-AB9F The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: � Library of Congress � University Publications of America (i'" EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866'M Lehua Environmental Consultants. LLC (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5207731 - 3 page 2 Sanborn Sheet Key This Certified Sanborn Map Report is based upon the following Sanborn Fire Insurance map sheets. 1991 Source Sheets 1 , ... ... . t•.;4 + .J .:., Volume 1, Sheet 30 1987 Source Sheets Volume 1, Sheet 30 1978 Source Sheets Volume 1, Sheet 30 1974 Source Sheets Volume 1, Sheet 30 5207731 - 3 page 3 Sanborn Sheet Key This Certified Sanborn Map Report is based upon the following Sanborn Fire Insurance map sheets. 1957 Source Sheets Volume 1, Sheet 30 1921 Source Sheets I . - . ·--&, .. -: . . .... - 'i _. ..• J • Volume 1, Sheet 30 5207731 - 3 page 4 Certified Sanborn® Map 1991 r-----------------------------------------------SiteName: 525Plllan1Street Address: 525 Piilanl Street City, ST, ZIP: Hilo, HI 96720 Client Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC EDA Inquiry: 520TT31.3 Order Date: 0lfOS/2018 Certification I 9DEA-4B20-AB9F Co • ht 1991 E9 8i 1 0 C\I m w 0 O> This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 30 I 30 o Feet Z-C.- I [tj l(fr.p/a.?s) I • IPA RJ:' -c- � . II 150 � � � 300 PAR I< 'G _Jl_PARK'G � <ii '< � ��]�] 5207731 - 3 AV. 600 page 5 Certified Sanborn® Map r-----------------------------------------------SiteName: 525Plllan1Street 8i 1 0 C\I m w 0 O> Address: 525 Piilanl Street City, ST, ZIP: Hilo, HI 96720 Client Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC EDA Inquiry: 520TT31.3 Order Date: 0lfOS/2018 Certification I 9DEA-4B20-AB9F Co • ht 1987 �;�\ -------,---------;::�� 'O ,.. This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 30 I 30 o Feet 150 � - @ Gfil � :;, rrn r:_ \; , •. ' -!1.l��i:r,"o\\ t ' ! 300 5207731 - 3 1987 E9 P A R K 600 page 6 Certified Sanborn® Map r-----------------------------------------------SiteName: 525Plllan1Street 8i 1 0 C\I m w 0 O> This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 30 l 30 I I �?.7� tj EJ ! � o Feet 150 <:m . Address: 525 Piilanl Street City, ST, ZIP: Hilo, HI 96720 Client Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC EDA Inquiry: 520TT31.3 Order Date: 0lfOS/2018 Certification I 9DEA-4B20-AB9F Co • ht 1978 !a;; ..; r;, [�} �r-/ , 0 300 5207731 - 3 1978 E9 PU AV. 600 page 7 Certified Sanborn® Map r-----------------------------------------------SiteName: 525Plllan1Street Address: 525 Piilanl Street City, ST, ZIP: Hilo, HI 96720 Client Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC 8i 1 0 C\I m w 0 O> This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 30 I 30 EJ � o Feet r, .I, ._ • .J EDA Inquiry: 520TT31.3 Order Date: 0lfOS/2018 Certification I 9DEA-4B20-AB9F Co • ht 1974 150 300 5207731 - 3 1974 E9 PIIL.ANI AV. 271?. page 8 I II 600 Certified Sanborn® Map r--------------------------------------------------SiteName: 525Plllan1Street 8i 1 0 C\I m w 0 O> This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets.Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 30 �": --:,;.: .. ,-" •�•C I 30 �� eJ o Feet �. 150 Address: 525 Piilanl Street City, ST, ZIP: Hilo, HI 96720 Client Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC EDA Inquiry: 520TT31.3 Order Date: 0lfOS/2018 Certification I 9DEA-4B20-AB9F Co • ht 1957 300 5207731 - 3 1957 E9 600 page 9 Certified Sanborn® Map r--------------------------------------------------SiteName: 525Plllan1Street � • 0) m 1 C\I m l 0 0) � C 0 , This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 30 lf� .. .·.f 436 � � C � o Feet 150 Address: 525 Piilanl Street City, ST, ZIP: Hilo, HI 96720 Client Lehua Environmental Consultants, LLC EDA Inquiry: 520TT31.3 Order Date: 0lfOS/2018 Certification I 9DEA-4B20-AB9F Coovriaht 1921 .' I I, 3q I . . . I I • I @··· - "' '� . � � 0 ,$l� � I I ' I I 111,11 I � �t Q .,, I " 300 5207731 - 3 1921 -E9 446 600 page 10 525 Piilan i Street 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 5207731.5 March 05, 2018 The EDR-City Directory Image Report �E DR" Environmental Data Resources Inc 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com ��---------TA_B_L_E_o_F_c_o_N_T _E _NT_s ________ �' I SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. ��--------E_x_E _c_u _1 _1v_E _s _u_M _M_A_Rv ________ �' I DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, lnc.'s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. Data by Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ □ @ @ Page 1 ��-----------F-1N _ o _ 1N _ G _ s __________ �' TARGET PROPERTY STREET 525 Piilani Street Hilo, HI 96720 CD Image Source PULANIST 5207731-5 ��-----------F-1N _ o _ 1N _ G _ s __________ �' CROSS STREETS Target Street Cross Street Source MANONOST 2014 Target Street Cross Street Source PIILANIST 2014 Target Street Cross Street ✓ MANONO ST 2010 Source Target Street Cross Street Source PIILANIST 2010 Target Street Cross Street Source MANONOST Target Street ✓ Cross Street PIILANIST Source Target Street Cross Street Source MANONOST Target Street ✓ Cross Street PIILANIST Source 2000 Target Street Cross Street Source MANONOST 1995 Target Street ✓ Cross Street PIILANIST Source 1995 Target Street Cross Street ✓ MANONO ST 1992 Source Target Street ✓ Cross Street PIILANIST Source 1992 Target Street Cross Street ✓ MANONO ST 1987 Source Target Street ✓ Cross Street PIILANIST Source 1987 Target Street ✓ Cross Street PIILANIST Source 1982 Target Street Cross Street ✓ MANONO ST 1977 Source Target Street ✓ Cross Street PIILANIST Source 1977 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PI'ILANI SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSE Appendix B Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF Pi'ilani Self Storage TMK (3) 2-2-033: 011 Prepared by: Engineering Partners, Inc. P.O. Box4159 455-B E. Lanikaula Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 January 2023 Table of Contents Executive Summary Storm Water T earn Nature of Construction Activities Emergency Related Projects Identification of Other Site Contractors Sequence and Estimated Dates of Construction Activities Site Map Construction Site Pollutants Sources of Non-Storm Water Buffer Documentation Description of Storm Water Control Measures Pollution Prevention Procedures Procedures for Inspection, Maintenance, and Corrective Action Staff Training Documentation of Compliance with Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection Control (UIC) Requirements for Certain Subsurface Storm Water Controls Inspection Report Form 1 1-2 2 3 3 4-5 6-8 9 10 10 10-11 11 11 12 12 13-15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The construction project "Pi'ilani Self Storage" will include a self storage warehouse in Hilo, Hawai'i. This Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after referred to as SWPPP, describes the procedures that will be used to prevent non-point source pollution from spreading beyond the project site during construction. These procedures are specific to preventing pollution spread by storm water passing through the project site. This SWPPP has been developed according to Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapter 11-55 with specific reference to Section 7 of Appendix C. The application of the procedures described herein will prevent pollutants from spreading beyond the project site by way of storm water runoff. STORM WATER TEAM (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.1) The persons described below as part of this project's Storm Water Team are responsible for the development, modification, and implementation of the SWPPP. Mr. Yen Wen Fang, P.E. Mr. Fang is the Civil Engineer of Record and is responsible for the initial draft{s) of the SWPPP and any revisions necessary to obtain approval from the Department of Health - Clean Water Branch. General Contractor Responsibilities: 1. Install and maintain storm water runoff controls and Best Management Practices {BMP's) through the duration of the construction. 2.Conduct weekly inspections of the site to check storm water runoff control measures and BMP' s to detect violations of and conditions which may cause violations. 3.Take immediate corrective action to repair, modify or replace any storm water control; dean up and properly dispose of spills and releases; remedy a permit violation. 4.Notify the Construction Project Manager of any violations, and corrective actions taken with regard to the storm water controls, BMPs, the Permit and the SWPPP. Contact info to be provided at least 30 days prior to construction Name: Telephone: Email: Construction Project Manager Responsibilities: 1. Oversee construction of the project and provide construction management services. 2.Submit additional information/ documents necessary to complete the NPDES permit to the Owner. 3.Submit information/ documents for compliance with the NPDES permit conditions to the Owner. 4.Conduct periodic site inspections for compliance with permit conditions. Check storm water runoff control measures and best management practices (BMPs) to detect violations of and conditions which may cause violations. 5.Recommend modification of the SWPPP to the Owner. Recommendations shall be based on site observations and input by other storm water team members. 6.Maintain records of any modifications to the SWPPP including monthly reports. 7.Ensure members of the storm water team are aware of changes to the SWPPP and ensure changes are implemented by the General Contractor at the construction site. 8.Immediately notify the Owner of any violations, and corrective actions taken with regard to the storm water controls, BMPs, the Permit and the SWPPP. 9.Notify the Owner of situations or occurrences which may impact use or operation of the facility or its employees and users. Contact info to be provided at least 30 days prior to construction Name: Telephone: Email: NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, 7.2.2) The parcel area is approximately 2.57 acres. Of the overall project area, approximately 2.52 acres will be disturbed by the proposed construction activities. Construction activities will include storage warehouse construction, AC paving, landscaping, concrete walkways/ pavement, possible retaining wall construction, drainage improvements utility installation and site grading. The area expected to be disturbed at any one time should be no greater than 2.52 acres. Construction areas, including support areas such as stockpiles, and storage, will be confined to the project site. EMERGENCY RELATED PROJECTS (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.3) This is not an emergency project. IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER SITE CONTRACTORS (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.4) At this time, the contractors and subcontractors for this project have not been determined. Upon their determination, and at least 30 prior to the start of construction, a revised SWPPP identifying all site contractors will be submitted. (General Contractor Company Name) TBD (General Contractor Contact Person Name) TBD (General Contractor Mailing Address) TBD (General Contractor Mailing City) TBD I (GC Mailing State and Zip Code) TBD (General Contractor Telephone Number) TBD (General Contractor Email Address) TBD (Sub-Contractor #1 Company Name, as needed) TBD (Sub-Contractor Contact Person Name) TBD (Sub-Contractor Mailing Address) TBD (Sub-Contractor Mailing City) TBD I (Sub Mailing State and Zip Code) TBD (Sub-Contractor Telephone Number) TBD (Sub-Contractor Email Address) TBD (Sub-Contractor #1 Company Name, as needed) TBD (Sub-Contractor Contact Person Name) TBD (Sub-Contractor Mailing Address) TBD (Sub-Contractor Mailing City) TBD I (Sub Mailing State and Zip Code) TBD (Sub-Contractor Telephone Number) TBD (Sub-Contractor Email Address) TBD Install Perimeter BMPs Interior BMPs Rough Grading Retaining Walls (if needed) Underground Utilities Building Erection Final Site Grading and Paving Site Finish Work and Landscaping Removal of Temporacy BMPs Hawaii Administrative Rules Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.6 / ,--f--I I w I I I w I et::: I --- f-- _J :r: w ••••·· •••••·· .. .. .. .. .. .. ..•♦ •♦ .. .. .. .. .. .. •••••••...... ZON[ X ••••••···· ••···· .. zo •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NEV[ OUT I IN ..... •··� TMK: 2- ZONE: V •·s1 o.oo' --1 ao· ••••••••••• ••. M I L I •••••••••••••••• ••♦ • . . L .. ..... - -,_\______\. ..·• ..LEGEND r;'\ A ____ B_M_P_S_IT_E_P_L_A_N_0 __ 4--i-0, __ 80, \!2j SCALE: 1" = 40' PROTECTED AREA SANDBAG MIN. LENGTH= 18" MIN. WIDTH= 12" MIN. THICKNESS=3" PLACE EVERY 6' TYP SANDBAG MIN. LENGTH= 18" MIN. WIDTH= 12" MIN. THICKNESS=3" PLACE EVERY 6' TYP FILTER SOCK WORK} AREA SECTION PROTECTED AREA .--+--r-----LIM ITS OF GRADING 6" MIN. OVERLAP WORK AREA RUNOFF FLOW FILTER SOCK OVERLAP �RUNOFF PROTECTEC AREA (_ SANDBAG SECURE EACH END � FWW !I 0�F=--=I;.;;;;;;;;;.L..;;;..;TE;;;;;;;;.;;R;;;....;;;....;S....;;;;...O....;;;;..C.;;;;;..;;;;K;....__ _______ _�J SCALE: NOT TO SCALE �o it1....-________________________ _ CONSTRUCTION SITE POLLUTANTS (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.7) Rough and Final Grading Concrete Pours AC Pavement Fertilization for Landscaping SOURCES OF NON-STORM WATER (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.8) BUFFER DOCUMENTATION (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2. 9) DESCRIPTION OF STORM WATER CONTROL MEASURES (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.1 0) Silt Fence Sediment Trapping Wattles (Biosock) Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit Compaction Vegetation POLLUTION PREVENTION PROCEDURES (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.11) Vehicle Maintenance Waste Transport PROCEDURES FOR INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, AND CORRECTIVE ACTION (HAR Chapter 11-55, Appendix C, Section 7.2.12) STAFF TRAINING (HAR Chapter 11-55. Appendix C. Section 7.2.13) Prior to commencement of earth-disturbing activities or pollutant-generating activities, whichever occurs first, the General Contractor must ensure that the following personnel understand the requirements of this permit and their specific responsibilities with respect to those requirements: 1 . Personnel who are responsible for the design, installation, maintenance, and/ or repair of storm water control (including pollution prevention measures). 2.Personnel responsible for the application and storage of chemicals. 3.Personnel who are responsible for conducting the required inspections. 4.Personnel who are responsible for taking corrective actions as required. The General Contractor is not required to provide or document formal training for subcontractors or other outside service providers, but must ensure that such personnel understand any requirements of the permit that may be affected by the work they are subcontracted to perform. At a minimum, personnel must be trained to understand the following if related to the scope of their job duties (e.g. only personnel responsible for conducting inspections need to understand how to conduct inspections): 1 . The location of all storm water control on the site required by this Permit, and how they are to be maintained. 2.The proper procedures to follow with respect to the Permit's pollution prevention requirements. 3.When and how to conduct inspections, record applicable findings, and take corrective measures. DOCUMENTATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN SUBSURFACE STORM WATER CONTROLS (HAR Chapter 11-55. Appendix C. Section 7.2.14) If using any of the following storm water controls at the site, as described below, the permittee must document any contact with the Department of Health's Safe Drinking Water Branch (SDWB) for implementing the requirements for underground injection wells in the Safe Drinking Water Act. 1 . Infiltration trenches (if storm water is directed to any bored, drilled, driven shaft or dug hole that is deeper than its widest surface dimension, or has a subsurface fluid distribution system. 2.Commercially manufactured precast or pre-built proprietary subsurface detention vaults, chambers, or other devices designed to capture and infiltrate storm water How. 3.Drywells, seepage pits, or improved sinkholes (if storm water is directed to any bored, drilled, driven shaft or dug hole that is deeper than its widest surface dimension, or has subsurface fluid distribution system). INSPECTION REPORT FORM Project/Site: ___________________ _ Permit No.: _________ _ Weather:. __________ _ :ruction Best Management Practices Yes No N/A Date Notes (SSCBMPs) Plan Corrected ; & SWPPP plan available at the site? rent and up-to-date? ms available at the site? s available at the site? Site Conditions Yes No N/A Notes and Corrective Actions !ring the construction site? DIiuted discharges off the site? DIiuted discharges from the site? i, or installation of sediment control ite? i, or installation of erosion control ite? irials/debris/trash/soil stored or It the site? 1g from the site to receiving streets? ire additional or revised BMPs are ire BMPs may no longer be necessary :ion indicate a need to update or revise m and/or accompanying drawings? Installed Per Needs Date Practices Location Specifications Adequate Maintenance N/A Corrected Notes (V/N) ter Flowing onto and through the Project ection 1d Sediment Barriers )etention Ponds ::!SS Structures :I Sediment Control BMPs Installed per Needs Date Practices Location Specifications Adequate Maintenance N/A Corrected Notes (Y/N) I Waste Management �as hide Fueling and Maintenance Practices n or Sediment Control BMPs Ps i SWPPP inspection documented above are: hed, or inserted. e person who performed the inspection documented above and that all information recorded on this form is a true and tion of what was observed at the construction site recorded above. Any photographs attached that were taken during true, accurate, and unaltered representation of what was observed during the inspection documented above. Date: _________________ _ FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PI'ILANI SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSE Appendix C Archaeological Inventory Survey FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 WAI.A.KEA AHUPUA'A SOUTH HILO DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAI'I HAUN 8c ASSOCIATES 1481-081018 ARCHAEOLOGICAL, CULTURAL, AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 73-4161 KAAO ROAD, KAILUA·KONA HI 96740 PHONE: 808-325-2402 FAX.: 808-325-1 520 FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 WAIAKEA AHUPUA' A SOUTH HILO DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAl'I Prepared by: Alan E. Haun, Ph.D. and Dave Henry, B.S. Prepared for: COLUMBUS East, LLC 2571 Lemon Road, Honolulu, HI 96815 August 2018 HAUN 8c ASSOCIATES 1481-081018 ARCHAEOLOGICAL, CULTURAL, AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 73-4161 KAAO ROAD, KAILUA·KONA HI 96740 PHONE: 808-325-2402 FAX: 808-325-1 520 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Repo rt No .1481-0 81 01 8 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Haun & Associates conducted an archaeological inventory survey (AIS) of the 2.57 acre TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 located in Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. The objective of the AIS is to satisfy current historic preservation regulatory review inventory requirements of the Department of Land and Natural Resources State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD), as contained within Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Title 13, DLNR, Subtitle 13, Chapters 276 and 284, State Historic Preservation Rules. The survey identified one site in the project area consisting of a concrete slab interpreted as an historic foundation or walkway (Site 50-10-35-308891). The site is assessed as significant solely for its information content. The site has yielded information important for understanding historic activity in the area. The mapping, written descriptions and photography of Site 30889 adequately document it and no further work or preservation is recommended. Four displaced isolated objects were also identified during the project. These consist of a metal gear (Isolated Object 1), a concrete post (Isolated Object 2), and two concrete platforms (Isolated Object 3 and 4). The displaced gear and the concrete post are probably associated with the historic use of the project area; however, the two concrete platforms were brought to the project area in the 1990s and were used to support cooling towers. The proposed project consists of the construction of a warehouse and adjacent office building with associated infrastructure to be located in the southern portion of the project area. There are no immediate plans for the development of the remainder of the parcel. The proposed project will consist of mechanically grading the project area in advance of the construction activity. Site 30889 will potentially be impacted during future development. This activity will have no effect on historic properties because Site 30889 requires no further work or preservation. Cover photo: Vegetation in eastern portion of project area (view to south) 1 All sites listed on the State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP). Site numbers are 5 digit sequential numbers by island : 50 = State of Hawai'i, 10= Island of Hawai'i, 35= Hilo quadrangle, 30889=Site number HAUN & ASSOCIATES I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Contents MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................ 1 Project Area Description ......................................................................................................... 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................. 6 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................... 8 Historical Documentary Research ........................................................................................... 8 Previous Archaeological Research ........................................................................................ 17 Project expectations .............................................................................................................. 19 CONSULTATION ..................................................................................................................... 19 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 20 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 30 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 30 Significance Assessments .................................................................................................... 30 Treatment Recommendations ............................................................................................... 30 TRANSLATION OF HAWAIIAN WORDS .................................................................................. 31 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 32 Figures Figure 1. Portion of 1995 7.5' Hilo quadrangle showing project area parcels ............................................................. 2 Figure 2. Tax Map Key 2-2-033 showing project area ................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Proposed development within project area .................................................................................................. 4 Figure 4. January 21, 2013 Aerial view of project area (from Google Earth) ................................................................ 5 Figure 5. Vegetation in western portion of the project area (view to east) ................................................................. 7 Figure 6. Modern debris within project area ................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 7. Portion of Lyon's 1882 Register Map No. 892 showing approximate locations of project area ................. 12 Figure 8. Mid-20th Century map of Hilo ..................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 9. January 16, 1965 aerial photograph of project area .................................................................................... 16 Figure 10. Previous archaeological work .................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 11. Site location map ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 12. Site 30889 plan map and photographs ...................................................................................................... 22 Figure 13. Test Pit 2 profile and photograph .............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 14. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to east) .............................................................................................. 24 Figure 15. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to northwest) ..................................................................................... 24 Figure 16. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to northeast) ................................................................................. 25 Figure 17. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to south) ....................................................................................... 25 Figure 18. Isolated Objects 3 and 4 plan map and photographs ................................................................................ 26 Figure 19. Test Pit 1 profile and photograph .............................................................................................................. 28 Figure 20. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 ................................................................................................ 29 Figure 21. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 ................................................................................................ 29 I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Tables Table 1. Land commission Awards in Waiakea Ahupua'a ............................................................................................. 9 Table 2. Previous archaeological work in Waiakea ..................................................................................................... 17 I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 INTRODUCTION At the request of Ms. Fumiyo Okuda of COLUMBUS East, LLC, Haun & Associates conducted an archaeological inventory survey (AIS) of the 2.57 acre TMK:(3) 2-2-033:011 located in Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The objective of the AIS is to satisfy current historic preservation regulatory review inventory requirements of the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD), as contained within Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Title 13, DLNR, Subtitle 13, Chapters 276 and 284, State Historic Preservation Rules (DLNR 2003). The developer, COLUMBUS East, LLC plans to construct a warehouse and adjacent office building with associated infrastructure within the southern portion of the project area (Figure 3). There are no immediate plans for the development of the remainder of the parcel. The proposed project will consist of mechanically grading the project area in advance of the construction activity. One archaeological site was identified during the project consisting of an historic concrete slab (Site 30889). This site was recommended for no further work. The site is located outside the area of proposed development but may potentially be impacted during future development. This AIS is prepared in conjunction with a Special Management Area (SMA) permit application for the County of Hawai'i Planning Department. The survey fieldwork was conducted between April 13 and April 18, 2018 by Haun & Associates Project Supervisor Solomon Kailihiwa, M.S and a crew of four archaeologists under the direction of Dr. Alan Haun. Approximately 16 person days of labor were required to complete the fieldwork portion of the project. Described in this final report are the project scope of work, field methods, background information, survey findings, and significance assessments of the sites with recommended treatments. Scope of Work Based on DLNR-SHPD rules for inventory surveys the following specific tasks were determined to constitute an appropriate scope of work for the project: 1.Conduct background review and research of existing archaeological and historical documentary literature relating to the project area and its immediate vicinity--including examination of Land Commission Awards, ahupua'a records, historic maps, archival materials, archaeological reports, and other historical sources; 2.Conduct a high intensity, 100% pedestrian survey coverage of the project area; 3.Conduct detailed recording of all potentially significant sites including scale plan drawings, written descriptions, and photographs, as appropriate; 4.Conduct limited subsurface testing (manual excavation) at selected sites to determine feature function; 5.Analyze background research and field data; and 6.Prepare and submit Final Report. Project Area Description The project area is a rectangular shaped 2.57 acre parcel located in Waiakea Ahupua'a between approximately 15 to 20 ft elevation. All elevations presented in this report are in feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The parcel is bordered to the south by Piilani Street and by vacant land to the north, west and east. The proposed extension of Mililani Street will extend along the west side of the parcel and the proposed Wehilani Street will extend along the north side (see Figure 3). Figure 4 is an aerial view of the project area vicinity taken on January 21, 2013. The Waiakea Fish Pond is located to the west of the project area. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 1 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 1. Portion of 1995 7.5' Hilo quadrangle showing project area parcels I Q) )> - (.;.) �� 1(,'.,,-.,;,, ,, ,, ., 'j," /'I', , , /�/ .,.�❖ ,._,,,. ,, ,, (,::.1/" ,, /1 V,'/ ,, .,,.:'L-:. j 1<,1,,,w,:;LOLANI --- ':,/,..-£pl ... -:,. ./r� /., .. / /l/ -.f.<1 / , ,.... ,/ .I //.' � I/ l/ .. ,-. .,."°" I«. t; I / / �::,�=4, ; / _./ <�;.,. .r-•-', I.W)/r. t--,' j C,4. 11•401• I) ' A/ I�� t .. � , . ., t.i:l I- .!1TRl!.�T ;cl·"· ®Iw,1a I �--� .. J / :I. 9"I 1: : --,,.,.., "-.ii N�lf/LMI rc-ty.r'H..,,.J/1 -· -----� (NH0/411-1( ----, ADt>fTION) ��--'( l,IKN�. r6, ... ,:, ,-.o...1 .... 0 ,, __ .," .. ,_,,, ::::::, r ;;; h 'C ... C•) .. IL--c .. --1 0 � Project area ,_,,..]!:. ).( IN(_,. o,,,_,, t;...-1,,.,.._ C• )( ,_1,,, ��:--,r, II L<t-...:: � la- 0 � "C !It s lk&!! J. Pl/LANI PL,#,,T l l ..... 1 il �.,.,) ,.,,. !'><cr; ''•"• ./ H•"'•" (C-ttly o/ H1w•il) E••G-Ord. I�� i' ,t :( r- J-IOOLULU PAIUC:. � !.I !JT�E.l!.T ,..::..;...,.;� / -· t--n'f /;,,";"._,.,.r 7 i �l,A� �I •n.H 1�1 i�$oi!-::f:i:;7 11.••"1' " , 'JJ: --)I, II lF7 llLOCX: W A I A ::. 1:: �1 � ./1l..OC.K l'1-H ,1 USE.' "G .BL:lC/< IS 'l.OT,5 PLAT , ..--l"LAT JS-I Figure 2. Tax Map Key 2-2-033 showing project area t "• l•1-· � � '" :::, �'" ij � "C 0 lo: --� "C .... 't' � h "C .... 'l I � z--33- j �� ,. i ' ��i n, ,c-,.,,_,_,_, .,. __ - AlJl'.·tl\'f"Jo: !'Iii-I-I \'UIJJJ:C7 TU t._'h_,..�tl "'6rc.l, Ors�J: 10,41,4, rHiit ·J·.�,;,r 'itlirli3T CONTNH\N• .1, l"AlltCt.LS �•••�n .. 100 it_ -I s:: ;,<: - (JJ - N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 ........ :;i:, It) "C 0 ...,,.. z 0 .... .i:,. 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 I )> C z Q) 0 () fT1 (f) � I h., m; "ii it I .m 7 I 6RANT ,, . .,,, ro I EtJ":.lRIG LJ6+("' UM'Nf'f, -;,_ I I I p!:,: � I � ..,."" -�,/, � ,1 -· --·· Wrt.N', LOTC. 134 SQ. FT. R10NJYM0�11",-»l1111..1.ANIT} SIDEYAAl)!IETIH:K:OFT FRONT YMDI TO IIE lNCIICAP£D � Rlll 1r) WAREHOUSE•�a311• 1,5009QFT OF1'1CE•2f'.:10'•!180SOFT TOTM. IU.DIHO AAfH l.09010 n IIWJIHGftEOUIREMEHTS! W.X. -.DING HEIGHT• ...,.-0" MiH DISTANCE 8ETWEEH ltAOIMOS• 1�-V Figure 3. Proposed development within project area -a -· C, .. At At TN, =+ :c�; =f �-2·]-03, oi:, STAT'E oP JW'\AI �J HOf'��PAA.J.:AODfrl0N) ZC/Nh6, V-l!lo �1"1I,teqJ FUXJL.f" � N4) ,-,:i;;,- LOT A 111,132 SG. FT TMK, 2-2-033, OIi ZONIN6, 1'1..-20 PROPOSED EXTENSION OF MILILANI STREET fWUtGA£0.MCMOO'KZONING· 1ITAU.1400ICIFTaDOIMA REQJaEJl'HIKNG-l,OIOl.aoD•ISTAU..S N;CLIA£0ACCUSa.£P,t,RKNG-1VN4ACCE.SSaf latiMlAI PNIQNO MJ90IS •Wfrl lTNCWIDITAU.IIZE•l'..-a11'4' •lotfrl I/NI.MX£115af.rALL•l'Vall'.0-•MW. ACCtSSA.18lf•ll,Vl ll'.V PMJYIDEDPAft!ONO• •IJSTNCWIOSl'AUS • 1 VAM ACC£SSa.E IT AU •1ACCIEIIHII.I SITE PLAN SCAU.11N,•30n. L.(W)NQZDfCRQM3P,t£Kt A.OOffARE.AUQ)-10.omlOFT•lu:w:JINGIPACl lCW>ING ZONE 0KNSIQI§; • I LCW)f«:J IE:UR[DNI) GROSS AA.EA c 5.00090 FT •MlH.LDliOINOZOtil•1(N'.ra'a.(J' • �UW>INO Z0NE (0PTIONAI.I • 1Nr • flNr LCW>INOZONEf!0'1!Mt •1-1.0,1,LW«lZONl•:tr-<ra'JIN/ 1 In.= JO rt. LOT B 134 SQ. FT. !!I I I PIILANI 11 PARTNERS, LLC -· �-Ot5CIIPll0N _..., IMPORVEMENTS AT TMK: 2-2-033: 011 "'PUNSTREET Hl.O,HIN72ll WNMEA.tclJTHHLO. 8.NCIOlw.wM TMK::1-2-0U.011 NnfflU SITE PlAN � ORA'MNO MJWIDI """'--'---A 1. 1 � � UII.._:_...SC -I s:: ;,<: -(JJ -1; 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) "C 0 ..., ,.. z 0 .... .I>, 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 :i:' t: I'll w GI ]> 0 11' E 0 ..::. I'll GI ..I'll tl GI 'o' ..0. 0 � ·;; iiij !'l'I ... 0 N ..i N � I'll :::, C I'll .... ,<i GI ..:::, .!!.O ... HAUN &ASSOCIATES I 5 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 The vegetation in the project area consists of bingabing (Macaranga mappa), tropical ash (Fraxinus uhdei) and banyan (Ficus benghalensis) trees, areca palms (Areca catechu), and various grasses and vines. The eastern half of the parcel is comprised of dense grass and trees that have been taken over by vines (see cover photo of this report). The western portion has a high canopy of trees with little grass (Figure 5). There is modern trash scattered throughout the parcel indicating the area has served as an informal dump for local residents (Figure 6). The terrain throughout the project area is relatively level soil. The soil is Keaukaha extremely rocky muck on 6-20% slopes (rKFD). This soil consists of a surface layer of dark brown muck (8") over pahoehoe bedrock (Sato et al. 1973:27). The Keaukaha soil has rock outcrops over 25% of the surface, has a rapid permeability, a medium runoff and a slight erosion hazard. It also is primarily in native forest with cleared areas suitable for pasture. The underlying lava was deposited 750 to 1,500 years ago from Mauna Loa Volcano (Wolfe and Morris 2001:11 and Sheet 2). Annual rainfall in the vicinity of the project area ranges from 3,550 to 4,400 mm (140 to 173 inches; Giambelluca et al. 2013). The mean average temperature in this general area is approximately 73.8 degrees F (usclimatedata.com). There are no surface water sources present in the project area. The project area is located approximately 600 meters inland from the shoreline at Hilo Bay and the mouth of the Wailea River (see Figure 1). Methods Archival research was conducted at the Hamilton Library Hawai'i and Pacific Collection at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa, the University of Hawai'i at Hilo Hawaiian Collection, the Land Survey Office and the Archives Division of the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services, the Bishop Museum Archives, the State Historic Preservation Division library in Hilo, the State Survey Division, and the Hawai'i State Public Libraries in Honolulu and Hilo. The field work portion of the project consisted of a 100% surface examination of the parcel with the surveyors walking transects at 10-meter intervals. Ground surface visibility throughout the parcel was fair to excellent. The features identified during the survey were flagged with pink and blue flagging tape and their locations were determined with the aid of a Garmin Global Positioning System (GPS) Model 60-series device using the North American Datum (NAO) 1983 datum. The accuracy of the GPS device for a single point is +/-3-5 m. This accuracy was increased to approximately 2-3 meters by taking multiple points including property corners and overlying the plotted points on a scaled map using AutoCAD software. The boundary for the sites documented during the project was defined based on proximity and probable age. Features that are likely of similar age (prehistoric, historic) and are less than 15 meters apart are considered to be one site. The sites in the project area were documented by preparing scaled plan maps, completing standardized site and feature forms, and photographic documentation. A total of 2.0 sq meters of excavation was conducted during the project. Test Pit 1 was situated in the southern portion of the project area and Test Pit 2 was located adjacent to the Site 30889 concrete slab. The test pits were excavated in arbitrary levels within stratigraphic layers. Test Pit 1 was terminated on the bedrock substrate and Test Pit 2 was terminated in a culturally sterile deposit. The soil removed during excavation was screened through inch mesh hardware cloth. Following the excavation, a section drawing depicting the stratigraphy was prepared and post-excavation photographs were taken. The test pits were described using standard terminology, referencing USDA Soil Survey descriptions and Munsell Soil and Rock color notations. Texture and inclusion content were also noted. Cultural material recovered during the excavations was placed in paper bags labeled with the appropriate provenience information and transported to Haun & Associated laboratory for analysis. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 6 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 5. Vegetation in western portion of the project area (view to east) Figure 6. Modern debris within project area I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Historical Documentary Research The project area is situated in the ahupua'a of Waiakea in South Hilo District. The ahupua'a is one of the largest in the district covering over 95,000 acres. The ahupua'a extends along the coast from the west side of Hilo Bay to the Puna District boundary and inland to approximately 6,000 ft elevation. Much of the following is summarized from Hilo Bay: A Chronological History {Kelly et al. 1981), an extensive and thorough compendium of historical information about Hilo including Waiakea. Hawaiian traditional and legendary accounts attest to the longstanding importance of Waiakea. The chief of the Hilo region, Kulukulu'a, who resided in Waiakea, was the first conquest of 'Umi-a-Liloa in his campaign to unify the districts of Hawai'i Island. Hilo with its large bay, fishponds, wet taro fields, and abundant freshwater was a population center for commoners and royalty. Kamehameha I and his court resided in Hilo in the 1890s. In preparation for his planned invasion of Kauai in 1802, Kamehameha built a canoe fleet at Hilo, reportedly consisting of 800 vessels. In 1824, a missionary station was established in Waiakea. Soon after, churches and schools were established. Whalers began stopping at Hilo in the mid-1820s. In the 1830s, a sawmill was built, and two stores were opened. By the end of the decade, a sugar cane plantation and mill were established on Ponahawai lands. By 1857, there were three sugar cane mills in the Hilo area. A sugar mill was established in Waiakea at the inland end of Waiakea Fishpond in the late 1870s. By 1880, 1,400 acres of sugar cane were in cultivation and by the end of the decade over 5,600 acres were cultivated. In the 1900s, the population of Hilo grew dramatically with the expansion of sugar cane cultivation, pineapple production, the timber industry, and other commercial developments. Early historic accounts also document the importance of Hilo. In 1823, Ellis estimated the population to be 2,000 people in 400 houses. Ellis described the extensive use of lauhala thatch in house construction in Hilo. He described the land as intensively cultivated with plantains, bananas, sugar cane, taro, potatoes, melons, coconuts and breadfruit. Wet taro was grown in marshland mounds {kipi). Hilo was a center for trade among the people of Ka'u, Hamakua, and Hilo. Between the 1790s and 1820s, sandalwood was cut and brought to Hilo for export. Pulu from tree ferns and pia {arrowroot) were also exported. Ellis also describes coastal fishing. In the 1840s, political acts of the Hawaiian Kingdom government would change the land tenure system in Hawai'i. All lands were segregated into one of three categories: "Crown Lands" owned by the occupant of the throne, "Government Lands" controlled by the state, and "Konohiki Lands" controlled by the chiefs; and "were all subject to the rights of native tenants" {Chinen 1958:29, Beamer 2014:143). In 1846, King Kamehameha Ill appointed a Board of Commissioners commonly known as the Land Commissioners, to "confirm or reject all claims to land arising previously to the 10th day of December, AD 1845." Notices were frequently posted in The Polynesian {Moffat and Kirkpatrick, 1995); however, the legislature did not acknowledge this act until June 7, 1848 {Chinen 1958:16; Moffat and Kirkpatrick 1995:48-49) and the act is known today as The Great Mahele. In 1850, the Kingdom government passed laws allowing foreigners to purchase fee simple lands {Speakman 2001:91). The Kuleana Act of 1850 allowed for fee simple land ownership by commoners. The Waihona 'Aina {2000) Mahele Database; which is a compilation of data from the Indices of Awards {Indices 1929), Native Register {NR n.d.), Native Testimony {NT n.d.), Foreign Register {FR n.d.) and Foreign Testimony {FT n.d.) provides information on the Land Commission Awards {LCA) during the Mahele The Waihona 'Aina database {2000) lists 51 parcels claimed by 37 claimants within Waiakea in the mid-1800s {Table 1). All claims are for parcels HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 8 {J) f'T1 {J) Table 1. Land commission Awards in Waiakea Ahupua'a Apana Sedlon awarded 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 6 1 0 Ill Keawe Kapu N/D N/D Alenoho Kolea Kolea Alenoho Alenoho Kamakola Puainako Alenoho Kalihi Koleaiki N/D Kialoa 1 N/D Alenoho Hinaauauwai or Mahina auwai 5 Kolea Kalonoho Kalonoho Kanahana Puahua Piopio Piopio Kalulunui Land Use Boundary North cultivated Konohikis waste land cultivated, partly fenced Kaulu N/D N/D house lot cultivated planting plot konohiki cultivated field Waiiani cultivated field Kukuau cultivated with 6 houses Iii Ohelo house lot with 2 houses, waste land e:rave house lot Kaapa partly enclosed with 5 Iii Alenoho houses breadfruit tress, sweet Kauhopu ootatoes coffee 2 kihapais; hala grove Kukuau Ahupua'a house lot with 4 houses; konohiki breafruit and kukui trees Keaniho 2 cultivated fields Aiko uncultivated konohiki 4 kihapai; two houses konohiki house lot with 3 houses Barenaba cultivated field Barenaba uncultivated with one house Iii Walenoho cultivated with house gov't land 3 field & 1 house Kaiana 3 wet taro plots & 2 houses fishpond 2 cultivated fields konohiki 4 cultivated kihapai & 2 Kolea houses 1 cultivated kihapai Kekuaaoa's garden 1 kihapai taro mounds Niihau 6 taro mounds Kane uncultivated idle land 2 cultivated fields Kahalelalu 2 cultivated kihapai, road konohiki throue.h lot ---.. ··--_ .. , ..... _ _ _,_ .... Boundary Boundary East South Mikaeleiki Kainea Kamanuhaku Konohiki's waste land N/D N/D ocean Kekuanaoa Kahauai Kaluahino Manu Kalana Stream Pouoki's field Mihaeleiki road to Volcano waste land new road waste land Iii Kolea Iii Koloa Iii Koleanui Iii Kalili konohiki Kahue Iii Kinaauauwai konohiki konohiki konohiki stream konohiki konohiki konohiki Iii Haanaauauwai konohiki Barenaba Samuela Samuela lliWaiuli Pahulu konohiki gov't road Moealoha Alanui Baranaba Iii Kuahua konohiki Iii Kialoa Nakai Kaihenui Niihau Kaaiana Kaihe Kane konohiki Kauhi idle land Samuela idle land Samuela konohiki konohiki Boundary Date Rec'd West Kainea Kalua N/D N/D Kaihenui's house Kahue 1840 Kahue road beside river waste land 1847 waste land 1847 stone wall/gov't land 1841 Iii Alenoho konohiki Iii Kealou 2 Kam.1 time konohiki main road konohiki 1847 Iii Kialoa/Kaiholena Kam.1 time Kam.1 time Keaonui Kukaiholo Kupelea konohiki Kam.1 time konohiki Iii Kaapea Iii Hanahaiau Kalua Kaihenui Kaiamo Iii Alenoho Kaihenui konohiki Giver Konohiki Pea Parents N/D Kapuaakuni Kuiana Kaiana Konhiki Pea Kaunuohua Kaunuohua Pea Konohiki Kahue parents Kaiana Kamahiai parents parents Makaimo Makaino Kuahopu Konohiki Pea Kamehamhea I Kamahiai Acrei 4.41 1.6 0.6 0 2.91 0 10.2 12.2 0 1.3 3.7! 0 0 1.2: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0! 0.2, 0 ;;,,:: (J.J N N 0 (J.J (J.J 0 :;o Ill -0 0 0 .i:,. 00 0 0 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 situated along the coast and immediately inland along the lower reaches of the Wailoa River less than 0.5 mi inland. No land commission awards are present within the project area. Twenty-six parcels were awarded to 24 claimants. Chiefess Kamamalu was awarded the entire iii of Pi'opi'o under Land Commission Award {LCA) No. 7713. The remaining claims are for kuleana parcels ranging from 0.24 to 13.14 acres in area with an average of 3.6 acres. All, except five claims, were for single parcels. The testimonies for several awarded kuleana include claims for parcels that were not awarded. The claim testimonies refer to 18 iii land divisions. Five iii; Kalonoho, Alenoho, Kolea, Pi'opi'o and Paeaahu; are mentioned two or more times and apparently were linear strips of land extending inland from the coast. Iii Kalonoho was situated next to the western ahupua'a boundary with Kukuau. Alenoho was the next iii to the east followed by Kolea, Pi'opi'o and Paeaahu. The latter two iii bordered the west bank of Wailoa River and Fishpond. Six iii for LCAs on the east side of the river, from the river mouth inland, consist of Kamakola, Keawe Kapu, Kialoa, Hinaauauwai, Puahua, a!J.f! Kanahana. Kalihi was situated inland between Alenoho and Kolea. The geographic location of the remaining"Wi cannot be determined because they are mentioned in testimony for claims that were not awarded. � 111 Land use described in thf LCA claim testimony included agriculture, pasture, burial, and residence. Thirty-four houses are mentioned ani LCA 2274 also describes the presence of a grave. Most of the claim testimony mentions 111 cultivated fields. Crops i�lude wet taro, sweet potatoes, breadfruit, coffee, and kukui. A ha/a (Pandanus spp.) 1111 grove and fishponds are 10 mentioned. By 1857, there were thre-! sugar cane mills in the Hilo area. Large tracts of land were put in cane cultivation and "CJ sugar cane was also gro\91 by individuals around their houses. A sugar mill was established in Waiakea at the� inland end of Waiakea Fi�pond in the late 1870s. A railroad transport system was constructed for the Waiakea C Mill between 1879 and j380. Figure 7 is a portions of Lyon's 1882 Register Map No. 892 obtained from the Archives Division oE the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services (http://ags.hawaii.gov/su�ey/map-search). This map shows the Waiakea Mill, located to the southwest of the project area, a wharf andi,e extent of an 1881 lava flow from Mauna Loa that threatened Hilo. Between the 1860s and �80s there were two wharf facilities on the west side of Waiakea Point, one on the CII Wailoa River, and on the ijest side of the bay at the foot of Waianuenue Street . By 1880, 1,400 acres of sugar cane.... were in cultivation and by the end of the decade over 5,600 acres were cultivated. In the 1900s, the population of HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 10 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Hilo grew dramatically with the expansion of sugar cane cultivation, pineapple production, the timber industry, and other commercial developments. Between 1900 and the 1930s, the population of Hilo grew dramatically with the expansion of sugar cane cultivation, pineapple production, timber industry and other commercial developments. In the 1910s, the Hilo Railroad Company expanded the rail system to Puna and Hilo Town. A railroad wharf was built north of the mouth of the Wailoa River. Between 1909 and 1913, the railroad was extended to the North Hilo and Hamakua Districts. The opening of the Panama Canal and anticipated increase in trans-Pacific shipping lead to serious efforts to build a breakwater to protect shipping in Hilo Bay. Construction of the breakwater began in 1908. The breakwater was initially planned for a location just east of Coconut Island, but the plan was modified and the selected site was approximately 6,000 ft east of the island. The initial plans called for a 10,000-ft long breakwater along Blonde Reef. Stone for the structure was brought by railroad from quarries in Puna and Waiakea. The breakwater was completed in 1929. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 11 I )> C z Q) 0 () fT1 en .- teh.. ,how,";!! Lara j'!,,w oJ 168'1 (:;:) <J> 0 ·;i H-;,Jo, /-lo.,ru..it,,. ror,,tc I 0� , A�-�-.; .B,,•,-,t:..,(1,•,l, �, ... ...:.-I"-"""' r1,.-, Jy•..,;--�.,_.,,.._,, ! & ,.,._.,._ CJ1.,n•� -.t oo..-,� CJ:L.!I,,.,..,.., Pi i,h,,OTVu,- / / --:;,_/'- �- ,,.,� .... ,.-,-..,, rz�o;.,.,•·-z ,.3 ..... �� / . -,, .,, ..----< I ,..) $, ..,-/ �r �-/r / 1.. 1j __ ..... .,,,r:-.,,. ,, ,,,, 4£, � '} �_,..,,.o"/,,. --• .,,, j I ., • _..,, • �� � .,.,,i.• ,-,4/ L .,,.;,, vi"' _,,,� ,""J.�t// r G,....t'""'"1"' ,,-✓ \ ,r ,7"',)J � /'. f '.I"'!../ .-, ,,.� ...--i �____,,/J. J/ / ,G' --� -T -----/�/•C-../_,, � 'J �n• 7,.,.���./ -✓-- .E'o-r•., t,. 0 Figure 7. Portion of Lyon's 1882 Register Map No. 892 showing approximate locations of project area �""---'•• """\'• Waiakea Village �1 . -ii. 'I " o.,, .. 0 l ... r..,._._ 'u .z.� oG> coo 0oo�o ◊ •1w ...... ..-\pprox.imatc location of project area 0-.Mdl \ Waiakca Mill Cu,/,.f.:.ZJ. ,.,�,'-, <Lt:, (,. {.,. B ",, C;:,"/j, {)� -I s:: ;,<: (JJ N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) -0 0 ..., ,.. z 0 .... .I>, 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 By the 1910s, the existing railroad and government wharf facilities were inadequate to support shipping. In 1912, the Territorial Government contracted the construction of a new wharf approximately one mile east of Coconut Island and dredging of the adjacent portion of the bay. The new wharf, designated Kuhio Wharf, was completed in 1916. From the beginning, the wharf was congested and plans for a second wharf were made. Construction of the wharf began in 1921 and it was completed in 1923. A third wharf was completed in 1927. In 1932 a Canec manufacturing plant was constructed along Waiakea Pond, located between the Waiakea Mill site and the project area. Canec was the brand name for a fiber board made from bagasse, the byproduct of sugarcane. Figure 8 is a mid-20th Century map of the Hilo area prepared by the Work Projects Administration {WPA) showing the location of the Canec plant and the project area, obtained from the Archives Division of the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services (http://ags.hawaii.gov/survey/map-search). The map also shows the railroad line extending past the project area to the west. The following description of the Canec plant is provided by Peter Young as follows: Between 1879 and 1948, Waiakea Mill Company conducted mill operations at Waiakea Pond. Bagasse -a by-product of sugarcane -became a secondary industry, first as a fuel for the mills' boilers, then as the main ingredient for a wallboard product. As commercial fuel oils became increasingly available in the late 1920s, the use of bagasse as a fuel declined. This byproduct of production was then creatively used to manufacture a wallboard product for construction. In 1929, Hawaiian Cellulose Ltd, a subsidiary of the Waiakea Mill Company applied for a patent for the manufacture of it. {County of Hawai'i) On May 23, 1930, "The leading plantation agencies and a group of business men organize a $2,250,000 corporation for the manufacture of wallboard and other universally used bagasse fiber products. The name chosen was the Hawaiian Cane Products, Limited." {The Friend, June 1930) Later that year, the directors of the company "authorized the purchase of a one-hundred-ton daily capacity plant for the manufacture of insulating board from bagasse." (The Friend, October, 1930) (It ended up costing $2.5-million.) April 27, 1932, the company's Hilo plant (at Waiakea, adjoining Wailoa Pond) was opened; the company emphasized "the overseas distribution for which the industry aims." (The Friend, June 1, 1932) (By 1934, "five carloads were shipped ... to Manchuria." (Friend, July 1, 1934)) Canec was originally the brand name for pressed fiber board made by Hawaiian Cane Products, Ltd., but it has become commonly used to refer to all pressed board of this type. It was formed into sheets similar in size to drywall, as well as other sizes for use as ceiling and wallboard. Canec was used for interior ceilings and walls in many residential and commercial structures throughout the state of Hawai'i. {DOH) Reportedly, Charles William Mason, a Scotsman who ended up in Ola'a on the Island of Hawai'i in 1919, was the inventor of Canec. Mason became the superintendent of Hawaiian Cane Products Company, Ltd., located in Hilo near the site of the Waiakea Mill Company. (Johnston) The use of Canec as a building material in Hawai'i gradually expanded during the 1930s, but greatly accelerated after World War II when construction volume rapidly increased. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 13 I )>C z Q) ffi 0 () � fT1 en .....� L3.J).C/,il,.,,,.D,I. HI L 0 STREET MAP OF HILO SHOWING POINTS OF INTEREST p, ....... by W,P A-. HILO. Scale '(4 1/2. .Y1 0 100 .IC)O '"' - 41111 ... -... - ,_ ......... Figure 8. Mid-20th Century map of Hilo BAY .H. �+£ U, COCONU7 ISLAND (s-� ... �, KUHIO B,,._Y I I ____________ ., HIL 0 AIRPORT ( I I I I I I I , , I , , : H«wa;; N•t% (iuor,I !Ri/1-R•"'J• I I I I � I' I'I ', 1 I ' I I ' I I ' '\.. ___________________ j ', ' ' ' 'rr===============:::, ', "'\ CHAMBER Printecl by OF COMMERCE HAWAII OF HILO -I s:: ;,<: (JJ N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) -0 0 ..,,.. z 0 .... .I>, 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 It was estimated that from the twelve plantations contributing bagasse to the canec plant, one million tons of bagasse would be available for the production of wallboard. Hawaiian Cane Products was sold to the Flintkote Company in 1948. That year, the Hilo plant manufactured 120,000,000-square feet of canec panels; from 1945 to 1955; the majority of the housing in the Islands featured cane walls and/or ceilings. (HHF) Some suggest the canec plant was destroyed by the May 23, 1960 tsunami that devastated Hilo; actually, a fire destroyed the canec plant a month earlier (April 3, 1960.) In 1971, the hotel complex known now as Waiakea Villas was built on the canec plant site (the adjacent Waiakea plant millpond was made part of Wailoa River State Park. (Young 2016 - imagesofolfhawaii.com) Several devastating tsunamis have impacted the coastal Hilo area in the immediate vicinity of the project area. In 1877, a 16-ft high tsunami struck the coast of Waiakea destroying all houses within 100 yards of the shore along with a wharf, storehouse, a quarantine hospital on Coconut Island and a bridge. On April 1, 1946, a 7.1 magnitude earthquake occurred in the Aleutian Islands, generating a 50 ft high tsunami that struck Hilo, killing 159 people. (Hawaiimagazine.com) Smaller tsunamis struck the area in 1952 and 1957, causing little damage to the Hilo area. Unfortunately, because of this many coastal Hilo residents refused to evacuate on May 23, 1960, when an 8.3 magnitude earthquake in Chile triggered a series of waves that struck the area (ibid.). Many that did leave returned when the first of the waves measured only 3 feet in height; however, subsequent waves would grow to a maximum height of 35 feet, resulting in the death of 61 people. Due to the devastation of the 1946 and 1960 tsunamis, much of Hilo's bayfront was not rebuilt and is now comprised of grassy park areas. Figure 9 is an aerial photograph of the area taken in January 16, 1965 obtained from the University of Hawai'i at Manoa online library (http://magis.manoa.hawaii.edu). This photograph shows a large structure present within the project area. According to Suisan Company's property manager Mr. Harvey Taira, the properties manager for the Suisan Company has owned the property since the 1990s. He said that the parcel formerly contained a warehouse used for receiving fresh produce, and a dilapidated Quonset hut that was not used. Both of these structures were removed in the early 1990s. Potential remnants of this facility were identified during the present project, discussed in the Findings section of this report. The northern portion of the project comprising approximately 23,000 sq feet (0.52 acres) was formerly designated as TMK: (3) 2-2-033:012 (see Figure 2) owned by the Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO) under Grant 13431. This areas was subsequently added to the adjacent Parcel 11, which was owned by Ruddle Sales and Service Company under Grant 11489 (see Figure 2 and Figure 3). In summary, historical documentary research indicates that the shoreline along Hilo Bay was intensively settled and cultivated. In the early 1800s, missionaries established a station at Hilo because of its large population, abundant freshwater and cultivation potential. Soon churches and schools were established. Whalers stopped at Hilo because of the protected anchorage and availability of freshwater and provisions. Sugar cane cultivation, cattle ranching, and trade rapidly changed the traditional subsistence economy during the early to mid-1800s. By the late 1800s, vast areas were producing sugar cane and large scale timber harvesting was underway. Transportation infrastructure included a railroad system and wharf facilities. The area underwent a dramatic increase in population as people came to the area to work for the plantations and other commercial enterprises. Despite the destructive effects of the multiple tsunamis that have impacted the area, Hilo continues to thrive as the largest community on the eastern coast of Hawai'i Island, due in large part to the resilience of the Hilo residents. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 15 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 9. January 16, 1965 aerial photograph of project area I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Previous Archaeological Research A search of the DLNR-SHPD archaeological report database and other sources identified 29 archaeological projects in Waiakea; however, no previous archaeological work has been conducted in the project area. Figure 10 shows the project locations and Table 2 summarizes the projects. Not included in the figure or table are the studies by Stokes (Stokes and Dye 1991), which focused on major sites, primarily heiau throughout Hawai'i Island, a survey of east Hawai'i by Hudson (1932), the fishpond study of Kikuchi (1973), and the general, primarily archival, studies of McEldowney (1979) and Moniz (n.d.). None of the previous studies included the current project area. Stokes (Stokes and Dye 1991), relying in part on the earlier observations of Thrum, listed six heiau for the Hilo area; however, all were destroyed at the time of Stokes fieldwork in 1906. Ohele Heiau, a /uakini temple, was reported for Waiakea. The surveys in Table 2 cover 1,800 acres of Waiakea between sea level and 5,100 ft elevation. The only traditional Hawaiian sites identified in the vicinity of the project area are an agricultural pit, the Puna Trail, and five ahu reported by Hammatt and Bush (2000), a sinkhole containing a human burial identified by Bush et al. (2000), and a terraced depression and associated low wall identified by Haun and Henry (2001). Hammatt and Bush attribute the absence of traditional sites to the massive ground disturbance of sugar cane cultivation and commercial and residential development of the Hilo area. Historic remains identified by the surveys consist of 38 sites with 357 features. Nearly all of the identified features are the result of stone clearing for sugar cane cultivation. Table 2. Previous archaeological work in Waiakea Author Study 1ype• Elevation (Ft Aaeap Historic LIie Noof Noof Trlldltlonll FeMures AMSll sites Fe• Kam (1983) Archival research 0-5 1 None 1 1 Heiau Haun and Henry (2000) Inventory survey 0-15 20 Port 1 4 Walker and Rosendahl (1996) Field inspection 0-460 130 Sugar cane/ developed 5 5 Haun and Henry (2001) Inventory survey 35-40 66 Ranching/Air Field 4 5 Terraced depression and wall Devereux, Borthwick, Hammatt and Orr (1997); Reconnaissance, Hammatt and Bush {2000); Wheeler, Bautista, 40-80 504 Military 4 8 Pit, 5 ahu, and Puna Trail Wilkinson and Hammatt(2014) Inventory survey Haun and Henry (2008) Assessment 59-78 4.0 Sugar cane 0 McGerty and Spear (1999) Inventory survey 70 3 Sugar cane 1 13 Maly, Walker and Rosendahl (1994); Spear Inventory survey, Data 70-80 5 Sugar cane 4 51 (1995) recoverv Kennedy and Ireland (1994) Reconnaissance 70-80 8 ? 0 Carson (1999) Inventory survey 98-131 176 ? 0 Haun and Henry (2016) Assessment 100-105 5 Flood control 0 Borthwick and Hammatt (1993) Inventory survey 120-140 11 Sugar cane 4 Rechtman and Henry (1998) Inventory survey 120-205 40 Sugar cane 1 117 Borthwick, Collins, Folk and Hammatt (1993) Inventory survey 140-330 163 Sugar cane 4 47 Haun and Henry (2007) Assessment 151-183 1.4 Sugar cane 0 Hunt (1992); Hunt and McDermott (1993); Reconnaissance, Robins and Spear (1996); Elbe,Denham and Pantaleo (1997); Spear (1998); McGerty and Inventory survey, 200-1500 106 Sugar cane 11 88 Spear (1999); Dega (2000) Excavation Robins, Fortinii and Spear (1996) Inventory survey 200-1500 264 Sugar cane 3 18 Rosendahl (1994) Field inspection 250-290 11 ? 1 1 Escott (2004) Inventory survey 300-380 258 Sugar cane 6 80 Bush, McDermott and Hammatt (2000); Inventory survey 300-360 20 Sugar cane 1 1 Sinkhole w/burial McDermott and Hammatt (2001) Rechtman (2001) Inventory survey 5000-5100 5 Ranching 0 Total 1800 42 388 HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 17 llstorlc FeMures 4 1 3 3 13 51 4 117 47 88 18 80 357 I )> C z Q) 0 () fT1 en ..... 00 Breakwater 1-Jjjo Bay Figure 10. Previous archaeological work 6000ft 0 2000m �*� �� + '\, � I = Kam (1983) �� 40 3 = Borthwick, Collins, Folk and Halnmntt (1993) 4 = Hunt ( 1992); Hunt and McDe11J1oll (1993); Robins and Spear (1996); Elbe, Denham and Pantaleo (1997); Spear ( 1998); McGerty and Spear (1999); Dega (2000) 5 = Kennedy and Ireland (1994) 6 = Rosendahl (1994) 7 = Maly, Walkerand Rosendahl (1994) Spear(l995) 8 = Walker et al (1996) 9 =Devereux.Borthwick, Hammatt and Orr(l997); Hammatt and Bush (2000) Wheeler, Bnutista, Wilkinson and Hamman (201( IO = Rcchunan and Henry (1998) I I = Carson ( 1999) 12 = McGcrty and Spear (1999) 13 = Haun and Henry (2000) 14 = Bush. McDennott and Hammatt (2000); McDennott and Hnmmatt (200 I) 15 = Haun and Henry (2001) 16 = J-laWt und Henry (2002) 17 = !faun and licnry (2003) I 8 = Escott (2004) 19 = !faun and Henry (2003) 20 = Maun and lienry (2003) 2 I = Hnun and Henry (20 I 6) Rechtman (200 I) Survey at Kulani Prison not depicted -I s:: ;,<: (JJ N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) "C 0 .., ,.. z 0 .....I>, 00 .... 0 00 ....0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 McEldowney {1979) lists 53 traditional Hawaiian sites for Waiakea and 31 historic sites, primarily buildings. Most of the traditional sites were located by Hudson (1932) and Kikuchi (1973). The remaining six were identified during the Statewide Inventory Survey Nearly all were situated along the coast. The sites include 17 fishponds, seven burials, six platforms, five enclosures, three heiau including one previously identified by Stokes, three house foundations, three trail segments, two shrines, several miscellaneous features, and two complexes of platforms, enclosures, and terraces. McEldowney used the limited site inventory and historic documentary evidence to develop a land use and settlement pattern model for the Hilo area. The model consists of five elevationally-defined zones: Coastal Settlement, Upland Agricultural, Lower Forest, Rainforest, and Sub-Alpine or Montane. The Coastal Settlement Zone extended approximately 0.5 miles inland from the shoreline between sea level and 50 ft elevation. The zone was the most densely populated with both permanent and temporary habitations, high status chiefly residences, and heiau. Settlements were concentrated at Hilo Bay and sheltered bays and coves. Also present were fishponds and gardens where breadfruit, coconut, kukui, banana, wauke, sugar cane, sweet potato, and wet and dryland taro were cultivated. The ocean provided fish and other marine resources. The Upland Agricultural Zone was situated between approximately 50 ft and 1,500 ft elevation. Settlement in the zone consisted of scattered residences among economically beneficial trees and agricultural plots of dryland taro and bananas. Lava tubes were utilized for shelter. A pattern of shifting cultivation is believed to have converted the original forest cover to parkland of grass and scattered groves of trees. Wetland cultivation of taro occurred along streams. The Lower Forest Zone ranged from 1,500 ft to 2,500 ft elevation. Timber and other forest resources such as medicinal plants, olona, and birds were gathered from the zone. Site types consisted of temporary habitations, trials, shrines, and minor agricultural features in forest clearings and along streams. Sites in the Rainforest Zone (2,500-5,000 ft elevation) and Subalpine or Montane Zone {5,000-9,000 ft) were limited to trails and associated temporary habitations. These zones were used for intra-island travel and gathering of valued resources including hardwoods, birds, and stone for tool making. Project expectations Based on previous archaeological research and historical documentary evidence, the project area is located in the McEldowney's densely populated Coastal Settlement Zone. The prehistoric use of this area may include permanent and temporary habitations, high status chiefly residences, and heiau. Due to the parcel within Hilo town proper and its proximity to the Waiakea Mill, historic structures may also be present. CONSULTATION The project area is currently owned by the Suisan Company. The project client, COLUMBUS East, LLC, is a developer who proposes to construct a warehouse and an office building on the property {see Figure 3). Consultation regarding the subject parcel was conducted by Dr. Alan Haun with Mr. Harvey Taira, the properties manager for Suisan Company on May 15, 2018. According to Mr. Taira, the project area was purchased by the Suisan Company in the early 1990s. Prior to the acquisition of the property contained a warehouse used for receiving fresh produce, and a dilapidated Quonset hut that was not in use. This warehouse is depicted in Figure 9. Soon after the Suisan Company purchased the land, the warehouse and Quonset hut were bulldozed. Mr. Taira was shown photographs of two concrete platforms identified during the project, designated as Isolated Objects 3 and 4 {see Figure 18). According to Mr. Taira, these platforms, which were used as cooling tower supports for a cold storage facility elsewhere, were brought to the property by the Suisan Company on a forklift in the 1990s. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 19 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 FINDINGS The archaeological inventory survey identified one archaeological site and four displaced isolated objects in the project area. The site consists of a concrete slab (Site 30889). The isolated objects consist of a large metal gear and axle (Isolated Object 1), a displaced concrete post (Isolated Object 2) and two concrete platforms (Isolated Objects 3 and 4). The location of the site and isolated objects is presented in Figure 11. Site 30889 is a formed concrete slab located in the northwestern portion of the project area. The slab is rectilinear in shape and is 32 feet, 9 inches (10.05 meters) long (west-northwest by east-southeast) and 6 feet, 1 inch (1.86 meters) wide. The southwestern corner of the slab is broken, with the remaining sides ranging in height from 0 to 6.25 inches (0.16 meters). A plan map and photographs of the site are presented in Figure 12. The central and portions of the west end of the slab are covered in a thick root mat, with the remainder comprised of exposed concrete. The root from a tropical ash tree extends across the western side of the slab. An Areca palm and several bingabing trees are growing on or adjacent to the slab. Modern debris is scattered around the site. A 1.0 by 1.0 meter test pit (Test Pit 2) was excavated adjacent to the Site 30089 slab (see Figure 12). This excavation revealed two deposits (Figure 13). Layer I consists of 0.3 to 0.36 meters of black (l0YR 2/1) silty clay with 60% cobble and pebble inclusions with no cultural material. Layer II consists of 0.9 to 1.09 meters of boulder, cobble and pebble fill material with no cultural material. Site 30889 is interpreted as an historic foundation or walkway based on its formal type and appearance. The site's integrity is altered and is in fair to good condition. The site is recommended for no further work as the mapping, written description and photography has adequately documented it. It is assessed as significant per HAR §13-284-6 under Criterion d (information content). As stated, four isolated objects were also identified during the AIS (see Figure 11). Isolated object 1 is a large metal gear with an attached axle located in the northern portion of the project area. The gear is 0.67 meters in diameter with 0.04 meter cogs along the perimeter. "SR188" and "20T" are imprinted on the exterior side of the gear. The axle is 1.73 meters long and 0.065 meters in diameter and extends through the center of the gear. There is a 0.11 meter diameter wide metal hub at the other end with remnants of broken metal around its perimeter. Scattered modern trash is present in the area. Overviews of the object are presented in Figure 14 and Figure 15. Isolated object 2 is a displaced formed concrete post lying on the ground in the southern portion of the project area. The post is 13 feet, 2 inches (4.06 meters) long, 9.75 inches (0.25 meters) wide and 7.75 inches (0.2 meters) thick with beveled edges. There is a rectangular concrete base at one end that is 34.5 inches (0.88 meters) long, 31.75 inches (0.81 meters) wide and 11.25 inches (0.28 meter) thick. There is a projection off the main post that is 0.78 meters long, with identical widths and thickness. The end of this projection is broken and metal rebar reinforcing is visible within the concrete. No cultural material was found in association with the post. Overviews of this post are presented in Figure 16 and Figure 17. Isolated Objects 3 and 4 consist of concrete platforms located in the north-central portion of the project area, 31.0 meters south of Site 30889. A plan map and photographs of these objects are presented in Figure 18. Isolated Object 3 is a collapsed concrete platform located at the western end of the site. It consists of a rectangular concrete pad that is 10 feet, 5 inches (3.2 meters) long (east-west) and 6 feet, 1 inch (1.88 meters) wide and 3.5 inches (0.09 meters) thick. The top of the pad is 13 inches to 15.5 inches (0.34 to 0.4 meters) in height above the surrounding ground surface. I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 /�------------------, I I Isolated Object 1I I I I Test Pit2I I I 'Site30889I I I I I 1--Project area boundary Isolated Object 3-� Isolated Object 4 Manono Street-- Test Pit 1 Isolated Object 2\ \ '� -----------------I L Piilani Street N --Mililani Street �*m 0 150 feet 0 50 meters Figure 11. Site location map HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 21 0 0 8.0 feet 2.5 meters Figure 12. Site 30889 plan map and photographs (9}L_J ;,<: :;i:, It) "C 0 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 0 100 150cm Test Pit2 South wall profile Unexcavated Report No.1481-081018 Layer I -Black (1 0YR 2/1) silty clay with 60% cobble and pebble inclusions; no cultural material Layer II -Boulder, cobble, pebble and gravel fill; no cultural material Test Pit 2 -Post-excavation (view to south) Figure 13. Test Pit 2 profile and photograph I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 14. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to east) Figure 15. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to northwest) I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 16. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to northeast) Figure 17. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to south) I 0 () N O'I Figure 18. Isolated Objects 3 and 4 plan map and photographs N 15.0 feet 5.0 meters TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 There are two vertical formed concrete posts set on the ground at the western end of the pad. These posts are 10.5 inches {0.26 meters) square with beveled edges, and are 43.5 to 44 inches {1.1 to 1.12 meters) tall. The top of each post is broken. There is a displaced post lying on the surface of the pad. Modern trash is scattered around the feature. Isolated Object 4 is located 13.4 meters to the east-southeast of Isolated Object 3. This platform is intact and consists of four vertical posts that support a concrete pad. The feature is rectangular in shape and is 10 feet, 1 inch {3.08 meters) long (northwest by southeast) and 5 feet (1.55 meters) wide. The surface of the platform is a formed concrete pad that is 17.5 inches {0.45 meters) thick. The posts are 10.5 inches {0.26 meters) square with beveled edges. The surface of the platform is 51 to 58.5 inches (1.3 to 1.49 meters) in height above the ground surface. The bottom of the concrete pad is 35.5 to 41 inches {0.9 to 1.04 meters) above the ground. Modern trash is also present in the area surrounding this feature. As stated in the Consultation section, according to Mr. Taira, these platforms which were used as cooling tower supports for a cold storage facility elsewhere and were brought to the property by the Suisan Company on a forklift in the 1990s. A 1.0 by 1.0 meter test pit (Test Pit 1) was excavated in the southern portion of the project area, 25.0 meters north of Piilani Street (see Figure 11). This excavation revealed similar deposits to that observed in Test Pit 1 (Figure 19). Layer I consists of 0.14 to 0.18 meters of black {lOYR 2/1) silty clay with 55% cobble and pebble inclusions. An intact section of asphalt paving is present in the northeast corner of the test pit. Cultural material from Layer I consists of amber, light green and colorless bottle glass fragments, and a threaded metal bolt (2.5 inches long with 3/4" square head). Layer II consists of 0.04 to 0.08 meters of dark reddish brown {5YR 3/4) cinder gravel fill with no cultural material. Layer Ill consists of 0.48 to 0.86 meters of boulder, cobble and pebble fill. There is a 0.31 meter thick remnant of a concrete block located along the western side of the test pit. Cultural material from Layer Ill consists of a 2.25 inch piece of wire and a metal rod with a copper disk at one end. The metal rod is 9 inches long and 1/2 inch in diameter (Figure 20). The copper disk is 1.5 inches in diameter and has "Lunkenheimer" and "Fig. 2129" embossed on one side (Figure 21). Lunkenheimer was a manufacturing company established in 1862 that produced bronze and iron valves (http://www.lunkenheimercvc.com). It is likely that this object is a portion of a valve designed to control the flow of water or other liquid. The subsurface testing indicates that the project area has been modified by the introduction of fill material. Layer II and Layer Ill in Test Pit 1 and Layer II in Test Pit 2 are interpreted as imported fills based on their material composition and appearance. The presence of the surface sites in the project area, built on top of the Layer I soil deposit, suggest this soil was also an imported fill layer. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 27 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 0 Concrete block 100cm Test Pit 1 North wall profile Report No.1481-081 018 Asphalt 100cm Layer I -Black (1 OYR 2/1) silty clay with 55% cobble and pebble inclusions; cultural material present Layer II -Dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4) cinder gravel fill; no cultural material Layer Ill -Very dark brown boulder, cobble, pebble and gravel fill; cultural material present Figure 19. Test Pit 1 profile and photograph I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 o 2 3 4 5cm Figure 20. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 Report No.1481-081018 0 1 2 3cm Figure 21. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 HAUN &ASSOCIATES I 29 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 CONCLUSION Discussion Report No.1481-081018 The results of historical and archaeological background research indicates that a warehouse was formerly located in the project area {see Figure 9). This facility was subsequently removed in the early 1990s. The potential remnants of this facility, represented by a concrete slab, a metal gear and a concrete post remain in the project area. The project area is located in close proximity to the Waiakea Fish Pond and it is probable that the area was once extensively used prehistorically. However, subsurface testing during the project indicates that the subject parcel was significantly impacted by the historic introduction of fill material. No evidence of the pre-contact use of the project area was observed during the archaeological inventory survey. Significance Assessments The sites identified during the survey are assessed for significance based on Hawai'i Administrative Rules {HAR) §13-284-6. According to {HAR) §13-284-6 {b), a site must possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association and shall meet one or more of the following criteria: 1.Criterion "a": Be associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns of our history; 2.Criterion "b": Be associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3.Criterion "c": Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master; or possess high artistic value; 4.Criterion "d": Have yielded, or is likely to yield, information important for research on prehistory or history; and 5.Criterion "e": Have an important traditional cultural value to the native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group of the state due to associations with traditional cultural practices once carried out, or still carried out, at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs, events or oral accounts-these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity. The site in the project area possesses integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship. It is assessed as significant under Criterion "d". The site has yielded information important for understanding the historic use of the project area. Treatment Recommendations The mapping, written description and photography of the Site 30889 adequately document it and no further work or preservation is recommended. The developer plans to construct a warehouse and adjacent office building with associated infrastructure to be located in the southern portion of the project area. There are no immediate plans for the development of the remainder of the parcel. The proposed project will consist of mechanically grading the project area in advance of the construction activity. Site 30889 will likely be impacted during future development. This activity will have no effect on historic properties because Site 30889 requires no further work or preservation. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 30 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 TRANSLATION OF HAWAIIAN WORDS1 ahupua'a -traditional Hawaiian land unit usually extending from the uplands to the sea ha/a -The pandanus or screw pine (Pandanus odoratissimus) heiau -Pre-Christian place of worship, shrine 'iii -next in importance to ahupua'a and usually a subdivision of an ahupua'a konohiki -headman of an ahupua'a land division under the chief kukui -Candlenut tree (Aleurites moluccana), a large tree in the spurge family bearing nuts containing oily kernels kuleana -small piece of property, as within an ahupua'a Miihele -land division of 1848 mauka -inland olona - A native shrub (Touchardia latifolia), with large, ovate, fine-toothed leaves pahoehoe -Smooth, unbroken type of lava, contrasting with a'ii lava pia -General name for starch; starch made from arrowroot is called pia Hawai'i to distinguish from other starches pu/u -soft, glossy, yellow wool on the base of tree fern leaf stalks (Cibotium spp.). 1 -from wehewehe.org HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 31 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 REFERENCES Archives Division of the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services. 2017 http://ags.hawaii.gov/survey/map-search Beamer, Kamanamaikalani 2014 No Miikou Ka Mana Liberating a Nation. Kamehameha Publishing 2014, Honolulu, HI. Borthwick, D., and H.H. Hammatt 1993 Supplemental Archaeological Survey and Testing of the Proposed University of Hawai'i at Hilo Expansion Area (TMK:2-4-01:10). Prepared for Engineering Concepts. Borthwick D., J. Collins, W.H. Folk and H.H. Hammatt 1993 Archaeological Survey and Testing of Lands Proposed for Research and Technology Lots at the University of Hawai'i at Hilo (TMK:2-4-01:7 and 41). Prepared for Engineering Concepts. Bush, A., M. McDermott, and H. Hammatt 2000 Archaeological Inventory Survey of an Approximately 20-Acre Parcel Proposed for the USDA Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center located near the Intersection of Komohana and Puainako Streets, South Hilo, Hawai'i Island (TMK: 2-4-01:por. 122). Cultural Surveys Hawai'i, Inc Report prepared for SSFM International Inc. Carson, M.T. 1999 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the 176-acre Pana'ewa Campus Site, Waiakea Ahupua'a, Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (TMK:2-1-13:154) Chinen, Jon J. 1958 The Great Miihele: Hawaii's Land Division of 1848. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. DNLR (Department of Land and Natural Resources) 2003 Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Title 13, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Subtitle 13, State Historic Preservation Division Rules. Dega, M. 2000 Addendum to: Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project, Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukua 1 and 2, South Hilo District, Hilo, Island of Hawai'i. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. report Prepared for Okahara and Associates. Devereux, T.K., D.F. Borthwick, H. Hammatt, and M. Orr 1997 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Keaukaka Military Reservation, South Hilo District, Hawai'i Island, Cultural Surveys Hawai'i. Eble, F.J., T. Denham, and J. Pantaleo 1997 Draft Report of Supplemental Archaeological Testing Conducted Along the Proposed Alternate Alignments of Puainako Street (TMK:2-4-01), Hilo, Hawai'i. On file at State Historic Preservation Division, Kapolei, Hawai'i. I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Ellis, W. 1963 Journal of William Ellis, Narrative of a Tour of Hawai'i, or Owhyee ... Honolulu: Advertiser Publishing Company. FR n.d. Foreign Register of Kuleana Claims Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. FT n.d.Foreign Testimony Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. Giambelluca, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y.-l. Chen, P.-S. Chu, J.K. Eischeid, and D.M. Delparte 2013 Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawai'i. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 94, 313-316, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11- 00228.1. Hammatt, H.H. and A.R. Bush 2000 Archaeological Inventory Survey of Selected Portions of the Hawai'i Army National Guard 503.6-acre Keaukaha Military Reservation, Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Hawai'i Island {TMK:2-1-12:3 and 2-1-13:10). Haun and Henry 2000 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Hilo Harbor Facilities Expansion, TMK: 3-2-1-09: 2, 12, 41, 42 and TMK: 3-2-1-07: 20-37, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Prepared by Haun & Associates for R.M. Towill Corporation. 2001 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Hilo International Airport Improvements, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK:2-1-12:por 9). Haun & Associates Report 015 prepared for Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. 2002 Archaeological Inventory Survey, DHHL Project at Panaewa, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK: (3) 2-2-47: 01). Haun & Associates Report 173 prepared for Mr. Brian Nishimura. 2003 Archaeological Inventory Survey, DHHL Project at Panaewa, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK: 2-2-47:por 64), Haun & Associates Report 300 prepared for PBR Hawai'i. 2007 Archaeological Assessment, TMK: (3) 2-4-01: 116, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Haun & Associates report 577 prepared for Mr. Sidney Fuke. 2008 Archaeological Assessment, TMK: (3) 2-2-30: Parcels 17 and 19 Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Haun & Associates report 571 prepared for Hooluana Place LLC. 2018 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK: 2-1- 013:Por. 148), Haun & Associates Report 1102 prepared for PBR Hawai'i. Hawaii Magazine 2018 hawaiimagazine.com HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 33 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Hudson, A.E. 1932 Archaeology of East Hawai'i. B.P. Bishop Museum Manuscript. Honolulu. Hunt, T.L. 1992 Interim Report: Archaeological Inventory Survey Puainako Street, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i, Prepared for Okahara & Associates, Engineering Consultants, Ms. on file at State Historic Preservation Division, Kapolei, Hawai 'i. Hunt, T.L., and M.J. McDermott 1993 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Puainako Street Extension Project, Lands of Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2, and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Hawai'i. Prepared for Okahara & Associates, Hilo. Indices 1929 Indices of Awards Made by the Board of Land Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Images of Old Hawaii 2016 magesofoldhawaii.com Kam,W. 1983 Letter Report: Unrecorded Heiau on State Lands, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai'i (TMK:2-1-07:11). Kelly, M., B. Nakamura and D.B Barrere 1981 Hilo Bay: A Chronological History, Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai'i. Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Honolulu. Kennedy, J. and S. Ireland 1994 An Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Hilo Forestry Office Complex Extension located at TMK: 2- 2-2701, in Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i, Archaeological Consultants of Hawai'i, Inc. Kikuchi, W.K. 1973 Hawaiian Aquacultural Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona. Maly, K. 1996 Historical Documentary Research and Oral History Interviews: Waiakea Cane Lots (12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 20a). Prepared for UHH Hooikaika Club. Maly, K., A.T. Walker and P.H. Rosendahl 1994 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Waiakea Cane Lots, Portion of Parcel 6.Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (TMK:2-4-57:01) PHRI Report 1370. Prepared for Roy Takemoto. McDermott, M. and H. Hammatt 2001 Addendum to: Archaeological Inventory Survey of an Approximately 20-Acre Parcel Proposed for the USDA Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center located near the Intersection of Komohana and Puainako Streets, South Hilo, Hawai'i Island (TMK: 2-4-01:por. 122). Cultural Surveys Hawai'i, Inc Report prepared for SSFM International Inc. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 34 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 McEldowney, H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawai'i. Prepared for the U.S. Army Engineer District, Honolulu prepared by the Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum. McGerty, L. and R.L. Spear 1999 An Inventory Survey of an Additional Unsurveyed Portion of TMK:2-4-57:1, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Prepared for R.M. Towill Corp. Moffat, R. M. and G.L. Kirkpatrick 1995 Surveying the Mahele: Mapping the Hawaiian Land Revolution. Palapala'aina. Honolulu: Editions Limited. Moniz, J.J. n.d.Historical and Archaeological Synthesis of Land Use and Settlement Patterns, Waiakea Ahupua'a, Hilo District. NR n.d.Native Register of Kuleana Claims Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. NT n.d.Native Testimony Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. Rechtman, R. and J.D. Henry 1998 University of Hawai'i-Hilo, Kawili Street Development, Archaeological Inventory Survey (TMK:3-2-4- 01:5), Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. PHRI Report 1877 prepared for Inaba Engineering, Inc. Rechtman, R. 2001 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility at Kulani Correctional Facility (TMK: 3-2-4-08:9). Rechtman Consulting Report RC- 0078 prepared for Ron Terry, Ph.D. Robins, J., W. Fortini, and R. Spear 1996 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Proposed Mohouli Connector Road, Ahupua'a of Kukuau 1 and 2, Ponahawai and Punahoa, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Scientific Consultant Services of Hawai'i report 085-2 prepared for Youngki Hahn, Ph.D. Robins, J.J., and R.L. Spear 1996 An Inventory Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1-2, and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Report prepared for Okahara and Associates. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 35 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Rosendahl, P.H. 1994 Archaeological Field Inspection, Hale Nani Work Release Center, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. PHRI Letter Report 1516. Prepared for Belt Collins Hawai'i. Sato, H.H., E.W. Ikeda, R. Paeth, R. Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and University of Hawai'i Agricultural Experiment Station. Washington D.C. Government Printing Office. Speakman, C.E., Jr. 1978 An Informal History of the Hawaiian Island. San Rafael: Pueo Press. Spear, R.L. 1995 Data Recovery Excavations for Sites 50-10-35 19431, 19432, 19433 and 19434, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (TMK:2-4-57:01). Report prepared for Roy Takemoto. 1998 Letter Report concerning Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2 and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai 'i. Scientific Consultant Services Inc., Honolulu, Hawai'i. Stokes, J. and T. Dye 1991 Heiau of the Island of Hawai'i. Bishop Museum Bulletin in Anthropology 2. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. U.S. Climate Data website (http://www.usclimatedata.com) University of Hawai'i at Manoa online library 2017 http://magis.manoa.hawaii.edu Waihona 'Aina Corporation 1998 The Mahele Database, waihona.com. Walker, A.T. and P.H. Rosendahl 1996 Archaeological Assessment Study, Hilo Judiciary Complex Project, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. PHRI report 1721 prepared for State of Hawai'i, Dept. of Accounting and General Services. Wehewehe.org 2016 Hawai'i Electronic Library -Na Puke Wehewehe '(J/elo Hawai'i Wheeler, M., 0. Bautista, S. Wilkinson, and H. Hammatt 2014 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Monitoring Plan, Phase I, Keaukaha Military Reservation (KMR), Hawai'i Army National Guard Facility Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i, TMKs: [3]2-1-012:003, 131 and [3] 2-1-013:010, Cultural Surveys Hawai'i report prepared for Hawai'i Army National Guard. Wolfe, E., and J. Morris 2001 Geological Map of the Island of Hawai'i. U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S Geological Survey HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 36 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PI'ILANI SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSE AppendixD Traffic Impact Analysis Report Pi'ilani Self Storage Warehouse Traffic Impact Analysis Report TMK (3) 2-2-033:011 Hilo, Hawaii Prepared by SSFm INTERNATIONAL SSFM International Table of Contents I.PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................... - 4 - II.EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................... -7 - A.Geometric Configuration .............................................................................................................. - 7 - B.Study Intersections ....................................................................................................................... - 9 - 1.Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street ................................................................... - 9 - 2.Mano no Street & Piilani Street ................................................................................................. - 9 - 3.Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street ............................................................................................... - 9 - 4.Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ....................................................................................... - 13 - 5.Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street ......................................................................................... - 13 - C.Vehicle Volumes .......................................................................................................................... - 13 - 1.24-Hour Volume ...................................................................................................................... - 13 - 2.Intersection Peak Turning Movement Counts ........................................................................ -14 - 3.Transit Facilities ...................................................................................................................... -15 - 4.Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes ............................................................................................. -15 - D.Existing Automobile LOS ............................................................................................................. -17 - 1.Methodology ........................................................................................................................... -17 - 2.Existing Intersection LOS Results ............................................................................................ -18 - Ill. FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... -21- A.Upcoming Planned Projects ........................................................................................................ -21- 1.STIP .......................................................................................................................................... -21- 2.ERP (Previously OEQC) ............................................................................................................ -21- 3.Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii ........................... -23 - B.Volumes ...................................................................................................................................... -24 - 1.Background Growth ................................................................................................................ -24 - C.Future Without Project LOS ........................................................................................................ -29 - 1.Future (2027) Without Project Conditions ............................................................................. -29 - 2.Future (2027) Without Project Mitigation .............................................................................. -30 - 3.Future (2032) Without Project Conditions ............................................................................. -30 - 4.Future (2032) Without Project Mitigation .............................................................................. -31- 5.Future (2042) Without Project Conditions ............................................................................. -32 - 6.Future (2042) Without Project Mitigation .............................................................................. -33 - - 1 - SSFM International IV.FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. -35 - D.Future With Project Generated Volumes ................................................................................... -35 - 1.Project Related Volumes ......................................................................................................... -35 - E.Future With Project Volumes ...................................................................................................... -37 - 1.Future (2027) With Project Conditions ................................................................................... -42 - 2.Future (2027) With Project Mitigation ................................................................................... -43 - 3. Future (2032) With Project Conditions ................................................................................... -43 - 4. Future (2032) With Project Mitigation ................................................................................... -45 - 5.Future (2042) With Project Conditions ................................................................................... -47 - 6.Future (2042) With Project Mitigation ................................................................................... -49 - V.SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... -54- VI. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... -56 - List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location Map ................................................................................................................. - 5 - Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan .................................................................................................................. - 6 - Figure 3: Study Intersections and HDOT Tube Count Stations ............................................................... -10 - Figure 4: Existing Multimodal Facilities .................................................................................................. -11- Figure 5: Existing Intersection Lane Configurations ................................................................................ -12 - Figure 6: 24-Hour Volume Distribution on Manono Street between Kuawa Street and Piilani Street .. -14 - Figure 7: Existing (2022) Intersection Peak Hour Volumes ..................................................................... -16 - Figure 8: Vehicular Points (a) with a Median Refuge Lane vs (b) a Standard Intersection ..................... -20- Figure 9: Study Intersection Regional Traffic Volume Movements ........................................................ -25 - Figure 10: Future (2027) Without Project Peak Hour Volumes .............................................................. -26 - Figure 11: Future (2032) Without Project Peak Hour Volumes .............................................................. -27 - Figure 12: Future (2042) Without Project Peak Hour Volumes .............................................................. -28 - Figure 13: Kanaka Beverage & Cafe Project Related Trips ...................................................................... -38 - Figure 14: Future (2027) With Project Peak Hour Volumes ................................................................... -39 - Figure 15: Future (2032) With Project Peak Hour Volumes ................................................................... -40 - Figure 16: Future (2042) With Project Peak Hour Volumes ................................................................... -41- Figure 17: Peak Hour Volume Thresholds at Manono Street and Piilani Street (2032 With Project) .... -46 - Figure 18: Peak Hour Volume Thresholds at Manono Street and Piilani Street (2042 With Project) .... -50 - Figure 19: Conceptual Mini-Roundabout at Manono Street and Piilani Street.. .................................... -52 - Figure 20: Mini Roundabout at Halekii Street and Mamao Street in Kealakekua .................................. -52 - -2 - SSFM International List of Tables Table 1: 24-Hour Volume on Manono Street between Kuawa Street and Piilani Street ...................... -13 - Table 2: Peak Hour Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes .............................................................................. -15 - Table 3: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ............................................................................... -17 - Table 4: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections ................................................................................... -17 - Table 5: Existing (2022) LOS .................................................................................................................... -19 - Table 6: Island Naturals Complex Trip Generation ................................................................................. -23 - Table 7: Traffic Forecast -Daily Vehicles Trips in South Hilo .................................................................. -24 - Table 8: Future (2027) Without Project Conditions ................................................................................ -29 - Table 9: Future (2032) Without Project Conditions ................................................................................ -31- Table 10: Future (2042) Without Project Conditions .............................................................................. -32 - Table 11: Future (2042) Without Project Mitigation LOS Comparison at Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street ....................................................................................................................................................... -34 - Table 12: Land Use Development Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................... -35 - Table 13: Pass-By-Rate (Trip Reduction ) at Fast-Food Restaurant ......................................................... -35 - Table 14: Project Related Development Phasing and Trips Generated .................................................. -36 - Table 15: HPMS 2018 Roadway Volumes .............................................................................................. -36 - Table 16: Future (2027) With Project Conditions ................................................................................... -42 - Table 17: Future (2032) With Project Conditions .................................................................................. -44 - Table 18: Peak Hour Warrant Analysis for Future (2032) With Project Conditions at Manono Street and Piilani Street ............................................................................................................................................ -45 - Table 19: Manono Street and Piilani Street Future (2032) With Project Peak Hour Volumes ............... -47 - Table 20: Manono Street and Piilani Street Future (2032) With Project Intersection Operations ........ -47 - Table 21: Future (2042) With Project Conditions ................................................................................... -48 - Table 22: Peak Hour Warrant Analysis for Future (2042) With Project Conditions at Manono Street and Piilani Street ............................................................................................................................................ -SO- Table 23: Mini-Roundabout Benefits and Constraints (F HWA ) .............................................................. -51- Table 24: Manono Street and Piilani Street Future (2042) With Project Intersection Operations ........ -53 - List of Appendices Appendix A -Traffic Count Data Appendix B -Bus Routes and Maps Appendix C -Analysis Reports -Existing Conditions Appendix D -Analysis Reports -Future Without Project Conditions Appendix E -Analysis Reports -Future Without Project -Mitigation Appendix F -Analysis Reports -Future With Project Appendix G -Analysis Reports -Future With Project -Mitigation -3 - SSFM International I.PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed use is consistent with the property class "Industrial" and zoning "ML-20 Limited Industrial District" and is a three-floor self-storage warehouse with accompanying restrooms and elevators to serve the tenants. The design includes two porte-cochere on either end, North and South, to allow for large trucks and ADA parking stalls to park under roofed shelter and load/unload to the storage warehouse. The conceptual floor plan includes 88 storage units per floor for a total of 264 storage units within the warehouse. The self-storage warehouse schematic site plan includes 24' wide two-way access driveways at Piilani Street and Mililani Street. The site plan provides for 28 total full size parking stalls including 2 ADA van accessible stalls. The site plan also provides for seven 12x50 foot loading zones for customer convenience. The schematic design is three floors (12'-0" ground floor, 10'-0" floors 2 and 3 for a total height of 41 '-8" which is compliant with the zoning height limit of 45'-0". The schematic design aesthetic is meant to evoke the 1920's era of Hilo Town. This traffic impact analysis report (TIAR) analyzed traffic operations and impacts for the AM and PM peak hours in alignment with County Code Section 25-2-46 Analysis was completed for Existing (2022) conditions, as well as for the Future Without Project, and Future With Project conditions for periods of five (5), ten (10), and twenty (20) years into the future corresponding to 2027, 2032, and 2042, respectively. -4- -.:::. Figure 1: Project Location Map - 5 - SSFM International Project Location .... ---1 • , I SSFM International II.EXISTING CONDITIONS The Pi'ilani Self Storage Warehouse development is proposed within the NE corner of Piilani Street and Mililani Street. The area to the NW is primarily forested/undeveloped and is surrounded by the Waiakea Pond. The area to the NE has numerous recreational facilities, sporting fields, and an auditorium. The area to the south largely consists of single-family residential homes although there are also numerous small office buildings, restaurants, and shops interspersed through the area. Hilo town is located approximately 1.25 miles NW of the development while Hilo International Airport (ITO) is located approximately 2.00 miles to the east of the development. The University of Hawaii at Hilo and Hawaii Community College are located south of the development, approximately 1.60 miles and 0.80 miles, respectively. A.Geometric Configuration Hawaii Route 19 (also known as Kamehameha Avenue, Kalanianaole Street, Mamalahoa Highway and Hawaii Belt Road, but referred to as Hawaii Route 19 throughout this report for simplicity) is a State of Hawaii (State) owned roadway, extending from the Kuhio Wharf on Kuhio Street in the east (located in Hilo) to Lindsey Road in the west (located in Waimea), approximately 56-miles away. In the surrounding project area, Hawaii Route 19 is called Kamehameha Avenue and classified as a small urban principal arterial. In the study area, Hawaii Route 19 is a two-way, four-lane road travelling primarily in the east west direction. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter exist along both sides of the roadway. Between the study limits of Manono Street and Hawaii Route 11, there are marked five-foot wide curbside bike lanes in each direction along Hawaii Route 19. Within the study area, parking is not permitted along Hawaii Route 19. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH in the study area. Hawaii Route 11 (also known as Mamalahoa Highway, Hawaii Belt Road, Volcano Road, and Kanoelehua Avenue, but referred to as Hawaii Route 11 throughout this report for simplicity) is a State-owned roadway, starting at Hawaii Route 19 in the north (located in Hilo) and circumnavigating the island until its intersection with Hawaii Route 190/Palani Road (located in Kailua-Kona), approximately 122-miles away. In the surrounding project area, it is called Kanoelehua Avenue and classified as a small urban principal arterial travelling primarily in the north-south direction. In the study area, Hawaii Route 11 is a two-way, five-lane, roadway divided by a landscaped median of varying width. Along Hawaii Route 11, there are three travel lanes in the southbound (SB) direction between Hawaii Route 19 and Piilani Street, while there are only two travel lanes in the northbound (NB) direction. There are no dedicated bike facilities along this stretch of roadway. There is a six-foot-wide shoulder in the SB direction, and a tenfoot-wide shoulder in the NB direction. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter exist along the west side of the roadway. Within the study area, parking is not permitted along Hawaii Route 11.The posted speed limit is 35 MPH in the study area. Manono Street is a County of Hawaii (County) owned roadway, extending from Hawaii Route 19 in the north (located in Hilo) to Kawili Street in the south (located in Hilo), 0.70-miles away, at which points it continues as Kawili Street. In the surrounding project area, it is classified as a major collector. In the study area, Manono Street is a two-way, two-lane road travelling primarily in the north-south direction. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter exist along both sides of the roadway between Piilani Street and Hawaii Route 19; however, neither are present south of Piilani Street until just before the Kekuanaoa Street - 7 - SSFM International intersection. There are no dedicated bike facilities along this stretch of roadway. There are marked shoulders of varying widths (four to six feet) along both sides of the roadway between Piilani Street and Hawaii Route 19; however, these drop off south of the Piilani Street intersection. Within the study area, parking is not permitted along Manono Street. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH in the study area. Piilani Street is a County owned roadway, extending from the Wailoa River State Recreation Area parking lot (located in Hilo) in the west to Hawaii Route 11 (located in Hilo) in the east. In the surrounding project area, it is classified as a residential roadway. In the study area, Piilani Street is a two-way, two-lane, road travelling primarily in the east-west direction. Paved sidewalks and curb and gutter are not present along Piilani Street. East of Manono Street, a minimal width paved shoulder is present along the south side of the roadway, while a larger eight-foot shoulder is present along the north side of the roadway. No shoulders are provided along Piilani Street west of the Manono Street intersection. There are no dedicated bike facilities along the corridor. Posted signs along the corridor indicate that a pedestrian with visual impairments may live adjacent to the corridor. Within the study area, parking is not permitted along Piilani Street. Numerous vehicles were observed parked perpendicular to the roadway, outside of the paved shoulder. There is no posted speed limit along the entirety of the corridor, representative of a default 25 MPH requirement. Kekuanaoa Street is a County owned roadway, extending from Kilauea Avenue (located in Hilo) in the west to Hawaii Route 11 (located in Hilo) in the east, at which point it continues as Airport Road towards Hilo International Airport (ITO). In the surrounding project area, it is classified as a major collector. In the study area, Kekuanaoa Street is a two-way, two-lane road travelling primarily in the east-west direction. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter exist sporadically throughout the corridor but are not continuous throughout the study limits between Manono Street and Hawaii Route 11. There are no marked bike facilities along this stretch of roadway, nor are there shoulders. Within the study area, parking is not permitted along Kekuanaoa Street. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH in the study area. Mililani Street, Hinano Street, Laukapu Street, and Kalanikoa Street are all County owned residential roadways of similar characteristics in the vicinity of the project area. In general, they are two-way, two lane roads that travel primarily in the north-south direction between Piilani Street in the north (located in Hilo) and Kawili Street in the south (located in Hilo), although Kalanikoa Street extends all the way to Hawaii Route 19 in the north. In general, pavement width varies between 18-to 22-feet. Marked center lane lines are present on both Mililani Street and Kalanikoa Street throughout; however, they are only present at intersection approaches along Hinano Street and Laukapu Street. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter are generally not present along these corridors, although some are sporadically located at intersections. There are no dedicated bike facilities along these corridors. Within the study area, the pavement width is not wide enough to permit parking; however, it is numerous vehicles were observed parked parallel to the roadway outside of the paved shoulder. The posted speed limit along these corridors is 25 MPH. Mililani Street north of Piilani Street, adjacent to the proposed development, is unimproved. - 8 - B.Study Intersections SSFM International In the surrounding area, five study intersections were analyzed, as shown in Figure 3. These were selected by identifying significant intersections anticipated to be impacted by project-related trips which would add 3% or greater traffic to their forecasted volumes, per HDOT standard practice. Existing multimodal facilities are shown in Figure 4, and existing intersection lane configurations are shown in Figure 5. 1.Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street Hawaii Route 19 at Manono Street/Lihiwai Street is a signalized, four-leg, intersection. Manono Street is the southern approach to the intersection, which turns into Lihiwai Street north of the intersection. Both the westbound (WB) and eastbound (EB) approaches of Hawaii Route 19 have dedicated left and right turn lanes, along with two through lanes. The NB and SB approaches of Manono Street and Lihiwai Street have dedicated left turn lanes, along with a shared through-right lane. All approaches have protected permitted left turn phasing. There are marked crosswalks on all legs of the intersection. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter are provided on all sides of the intersection, with curb ramps at each corner. Auxiliary acceleration lanes for right-turning vehicles are provided along Hawaii Route 19 on both sides of the intersection. Through observation, it was determined that the traffic signal controller at Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street was fully-actuated. It was also observed that phase lengths varied each cycle depending on the vehicular demand. During numerous cycles, the protected-left turn phases along Hawaii Route 19 would be skipped if no vehicles were queued in the left turn only lanes. Vehicular loop detectors were identified in both the left turn only, as well as the through lanes at all four approaches to the intersection. Therefore, the traffic signal was modeled as actuated-uncoordinated. 2.Manono Street & Piilani Street Manono Street at Piilani Street is a four-leg, stop-controlled, intersection. Stop-control is provided in the WB and EB directions along Piilani Street. All approach legs have one shared left-through-right lane. There is a marked crosswalk on the north side of the intersection with curb ramps provided. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter are provided along Manono Street to the north of the intersection, but not to the south. The project site is situated NW of this intersection. 3.Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Hawaii Route 11 at Piilani Street is a three-leg, stop-controlled, intersection. Stop-control is provided in the EB direction along Piilani Street. The NB approach of Hawaii Route 11 has a dedicated left turn lane, along with two through lanes. The SB approach of Hawaii Route 11 has two through lanes, along with a shared through-right lane. The EB approach of Piilani Street functions as a shared left-right turn lane. An auxiliary median refuge lane on NB Hawaii Route 11 is provided for left-turning vehicles from Piilani Street, thereby allowing for EB left-turn traffic to only have to navigate one direction of Hawaii Route 11 at a time and reducing movement delay. There is a marked crosswalk on the west side of the intersection with curb ramps provided. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter are provided along the western side of Hawaii Route 19. - 9 - SSFM International ���=■�=.-;.�;:;:c;..,:1 Legend Q Study Intersections 1: Hawaii Route 19 at Manono Street 2: Manono Street at Piilani Street 3: Hawaii Route 11 at Piilani Street 4: Mililani Street at Kekuanaoa Street 5: Manono Street at Kekuanaoa Street -HOOT Traffic Count Station Manono Street between Piilani Street and Kuawa Street Project Area Figure 3: Study Intersections and HOOT Tube Count Stations -10 - SSFM International Existing Sidewalks @jjjjjjjm/M Existing Pedestrian Crossing Existing Bike Lane ---Bus Route eJ Bus Stop D Signalized Intersection ... ,: , Study Intersection ,_, Project Area Figure 4: Existing Multimodal Facilities -11- Lihiwai Street 1 \__ 4� +--+---\y - � +��---.... u-----t r � --.--� ------tu 1----- -t � Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection � 1 ! ----tu -fr \ii @] Unsignalized Intersection Figure 5: Existing Intersection Lane Configurations -12 - SSFM International Not To Scale � Stop Sign 4. Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street SSFM International Manono Street at Kekuanaoa Street is a signalized, four-leg, intersection. All approaches have dedicated left turn lanes with protected-permitted left turn phasing, along with a shared through-right lane. There are marked crosswalks on all legs of the intersection. Paved sidewalks with curb and gutter are provided on all sides of the intersection, with curb ramps at each corner. Vehicular detection is unknown at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street. As a result, the traffic signal was modeled as pretimed, with cycle length and splits optimized for each peak hour. 5.Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Mililani Street at Kekuanaoa Street is a four-leg, stop-controlled, intersection. Stop-control is provided in the NB and SB directions along Mililani Street. All approach legs have one shared left-through-right lane. There are no marked crosswalks, paved sidewalk, or curb and gutter provided at the intersection. C.Vehicle Volumes 1.24-Hour Volume Historic Hawaii Department of Transportation (HOOT) annual average daily traffic counts (AADT) on Manono Street between Kuawa Street and Piilani Street (see Figure 3 for count location) were available between 2013-2021, with the exception of 2017-2018 when no data was collected. 24-hour, two directional counts were also collected on Wednesday, April 6th, 2022, at the same location. Appendix A includes the detailed historical HOOT traffic data and the 2022 24-hour tube count data results. A summary of the historical HOOT and recent 2022 counts is shown in Table 1. Table 1: 24-Hour Volume on Manono Street between Kuawa Street and Piilani Street Year 24-Hour Average ADT 2013 10,723 2014 10,370 2015 8,905 2016 8,031 2017 - 2018 - 2019 10,320 2020* 8,763 2021* 9,953 2022** 10,149 *Collected during Covid-19 Pandemic **Non-HOOT 24-Hour Counts Figure 6 shows the 24-hour volume distribution between 2019-2022 along Manono Street between Kuawa Street and Piilani Street. Although traffic volumes fluctuated from year to year, peak hour volumes generally occurred around the same time. The 2022 AM and PM peak hours were found to occur between 7:30-8:30 AM and 3:45-4:45 PM, respectively, with the PM peak hour having the heaviest daily volumes. -13 - SSFM International 1600 -2019 1400 -2020 -2021 1200 2022 c 1000 ;;· 800 ;;,-600 400 200 0 � � "' (,) ... 0, 0) -.J 0, <D � :::: "' (,) ... 0, 0) -.J 0, <D � :::: ":' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "? "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N w .I, 01 a, -'.,, &, <l, .!. � � � N w .I, 01 a, -'.,, &, <l, .!. � � 8 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 )> )> )> )> )> )> )> )> 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0 0 0 )> :;:: s: :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: )> 0 0 -0 :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: :;:: -0 0 0 :;:: :;:: )> -0 :;:: :;:: -0 )> s: s: s: Figure 6: 24-Hour Volume Distribution on Manono Street between Kuawa Street and Piilani Street (1)Covid-19 Traffic Impacts The Covid-19 pandemic led to a 14-day quarantine of incoming travelers and the closure of non-essential businesses in the State of Hawaii beginning in March 2020. Towards the end of 2020, businesses began reopening, and non-essential employees began going back to work. Tourism slowly started to return as well. Beginning in the 2021 school year, Hawaii public schools reinstated in-person learning. Based on data from Table 1, the 2022 24-hour volumes were similar to the pre-pandemic 2019 AADT. Additionally, throughout the pandemic, HDOT has periodically collected traffic counts at various stations to analyze traffic volumes and how they compare to pre-pandemic levels. The closest station to the proposed development is located on Hawaii Route 11 between Halekauila Street and Pohaku Street, approximately 0.90 miles south of the study intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street. The most recent data provided by HDOT was taken on December 15th, 2021, in which traffic volumes were approximately 5% higher than 2019 data. As a result, it can be assumed that counts collected on April 6th, 2022, are reflective of typical traffic volumes in the area, and no adjustment for Covid is needed. 2.Intersection Peak Turning Movement Counts Turning movement counts were taken at the five study intersections on Wednesday, April 6th, 2022, from 6:30-9:30 AM, and 3:00-6:00 PM. The AM and PM peak hours occurred between 7:30-8:30 AM and 3:45- -14- SSFM International 4:45 PM, respectively. Appendix A includes the raw traffic count data at the study intersections. Figure 7 shows the AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. 3.Transit Facilities The County public bus transit system (Hele-On) operates numerous routes throughout Hilo and the surrounding region. However, there are no existing bus stops within a half-mile radius of the proposed development. The closest bus stop is located at Banyan Drive east of Lihiwai Street (Stop ID 127), approximately 0.7 miles north of the development (~13-minute walk). This bus stop serves Route 101 - Intra-Hilo Keaukaha, which runs along Hawaii Route 19 and serves the Keaukaha community to the NE of Hilo, as well as ITO. The route operates Monday-Sunday between 6:15-7:43 PM (shortened schedules on Sundays), with busses arriving at the stop every hour. The next closest bus stops are located on Kawili Street at the Hawaii Community College Campus (Stop IDs 107, 175), approximately 0.9 miles south of the development (~19-minute walk). These bus stops serve numerous destinations via the following routes: Route 10 -Hilo to Ocean View, Route 11/Red Line -Hilo to Volcano, Route 101 -Intra-Hilo Keaukaha, and Route 103 -Waiakea-Uka. Service times vary between the routes. Bus ridership data is unavailable. Appendix B includes detailed bus route schedules and maps for each of these routes. 4.Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Peak hour intersection pedestrian and bicycle volumes were taken at the existing study intersections on Wednesday, April 6th, 2022, from 6:30-9:30 AM and 3:00-6:00 PM. Pedestrian and bike volumes were minimal throughout all analyzed peaks. Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street had the highest amount of pedestrian activity, with up to six peak hour pedestrian crossings (PM peak), while Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street had the highest amount of bicycle activity, with six peak hour bicyclist movements recorded during the PM peak hour. Table 2 shows a summary of pedestrian and bicycle counts during the vehicular peak hours. Table 2: Peak Hour Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Pedestrian Bicyle Intersection AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 2 6 1 1 Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street 2 0 1 6 Manono Street & Piilani Street 1 4 2 0 Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 1 6 0 0 Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street 5 3 0 0 -15 - \__ 12(9] -720(605]✓57(64] s � i � \__ 7 (9) 527 (478]�,.., '° ✓5(4]✓i�u-�- 171181 _/' � ! ( 396 (538] ➔ -;:;,.-;:;--� 5 [16] "\ Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection _,..., "' 00 ,..,--er, N Lil Lil"' __,✓'------'i--1 u � t 10(8]/' 52 (109] "\ N <J> 0 � .... 01 �-::J N 01 ID v, -- Unsignalized Intersection 89 [106] 268 (385] 32 (61] "\ � Stop Sign SSFM International XX [XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) Figure 7: Existing (2022) Intersection Peak Hour Volumes -16 - D.Existing Automobile LOS 1.Methodology SSFM International Level of service (LOS) is a rating system used in traffic engineering to measure the effectiveness of roadway operating conditions. There are six LOS ranging from A to F. LOS A is defined as being the least interrupted flow conditions with little or no delays, whereas LOS Fis defined as conditions where extreme delays exist. Guidelines state that LOS D or better is appropriate for the study intersection and movements. Intersection LOS and delay was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro Version 10 .0 traffic analysis software. As stated in the HCM6 (TRB, 2016), LOS for an all-way stop controlled (AWSC) and a two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersection is determined by the measured control delay (see Table 3). Delay at an AWSC intersection is defined for the intersection as a whole and for each movement. Delay at a TWSC intersection is defined by each minor movement and not for the intersection as a whole. Vehicles traveling along the major, free-flow road of a TWSC intersection, proceed through with minimal delay. Those vehicles approaching the intersection along the minor movement (side-street) are controlled by a stop sign and thus experience delay attributable to the volume of vehicles passing along the free-flow road and the gaps available. As stated in the HCM6 (TRB, 2016), roundabouts (including mini-roundabouts) share the same control delay thresholds as AWSC and TWSC intersections. Table 3: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Average Control Delay (s/veh) LOS by v/c Ratio <=1.0 >1.0 s 10.0 A F >10 and s15 B F >15 and S25 C F >25 and s35 D F >35 and s50 E F >50 F F Source: HCM6 (TRB, 2016) The LOS analysis for signalized intersections is determined by average total vehicle delay based on the methodologies of the HCM6 (TRB, 2016), shown in Table 4. High numbers of vehicles passing through the intersection, long cycle lengths, inappropriate signal phasing, or poor signal progression can result in long delays, and consequently poor LOS. Table 4: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Control Delay (s/veh) LOS by v/c Ratio <=1.0 >1.0 s 10.0 A F >lOand s20 B F >20 and s35 C F >35 and S55 D F >55 and S80 E F >80 F F Source: HCM6 (TRB, 2016) -17 - SSFM International Another measure of intersection operation is the volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. This is the ratio of the volume of traffic utilizing the intersection compared to the maximum volume of vehicles that can be accommodated by the intersection during a specific period of time. A v/c ratio under 0.85 means the intersection is operating under capacity and excessive delays are not experienced. An intersection is operating near its capacity when v/c ratios range from 0.85 to 0.95. Unstable flows are expected when the v/c ratio is between 0.95 and 1.0. Any v/c ratio greater than or equal to 1.0 indicates that the intersection is operating at or above capacity which results in a LOS F per the HCM (TRB, 2016). A traffic movement can have a poor LOS but low v/c which suggests that the traffic volumes along that movement are low but must wait a long time to make the movement. This is common for low volume protected turn movements or side streets that must wait through a long cycle length for their phase to come up. 2.Existing Intersection LOS Results Existing LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software. Table 5 shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection, with the shaded rows indicating the overall intersection delay (applicable at signalized intersections only). Movements that operated at LOSE/F or v/c 2: 1.0 are highlighted in yellow. Synchro reports for the Existing {2022) conditions can be found in Appendix C. (1)Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (2)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street As Synchro is unable to analyze the impacts of a median refuge lane when analyzing the EB left turning movements at Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street, NB through volumes were omitted as to only analyze the ability for EB left turning vehicles to find gaps in the SB traffic and NB left turning movements. With a median refuge lane, turning vehicles can complete their turn in two separate movements, limiting the number of potential conflict points when compared to a standard intersection (see Figure 8). All other movements at this intersection were analyzed with volumes as shown in Figure 7. All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (3)Manono Street & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (4)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (5)Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. -18 - SSFM International Table 5: Existing (2022) LOS AM PM Intersection Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 19.4 -B 23.2 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 12.S 0.27 B 15.1 0.27 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 15.1 0.35 B 19.5 0.44 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 18.0 0.48 B 26.7 0.68 C Hawaii Route 19WB Left 11.6 0.16 B 14.8 0.22 B Hawaii Route 19WBThrough 17.6 0.52 B 20.3 0.48 C Hawaii Route 19WB Right 12.8 0.02 B 15.8 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 26.0 0.60 C 27.0 0.71 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.S 0.37 C 22.3 0.23 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.0 0.08 C 27.7 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 35.0 0.74 D 37.5 0.76 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 19.3 0.50 C 19.9 0.37 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - - - -- Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - - - - - Piilani Street EB Left-Right 20.2 0.23 C 20.8 0.39 C Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.01 A 8.2 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 21.6 0.16 C 22.6 0.20 C Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 17.2 0.35 C 20.9 0.41 C Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 29.2 -C 29.0 -C Manono Street NB Left 21.8 0.25 C 21.0 0.16 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 32.3 0.64 C 28.6 0.51 C Manono Street SB Left 22.7 0.28 C 21.5 0.26 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 30.0 0.56 C 32.5 0.65 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 22.6 0.35 C 20.5 0.31 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 25.8 0.52 C 32.0 0.72 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 17.2 O.Q7 B 22.3 0.33 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 33.4 0.75 C 29.2 0.63 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 22.1 0.13 C 16.0 0.08 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 17.3 0.15 C 12.8 0.12 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 8.8 0.02 A 8.4 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.01 A 8.6 0.00 A -19 - (a) SSFM International " � • • • • ·············r � • T T • (b) Figure 8: Vehicular Points (a) with a Median Refuge Lane vs (b) a Standard Intersection -20 - SSFM International Ill. FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS Regional traffic growth and future surrounding area development's traffic were added to the roadway network and analyzed for Future conditions for the years 2027, 2032, and 2042. A.Upcoming Planned Projects 1.STIP Research was completed on March 29th, 2022 at the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP) FY 2019-2022 website. The STIP is a four-year forecast that identifies state and county transportation projects to be funded with Federal Highway and Federal Transit funds. There were no roadway construction or other projects listed in the STIP (2019-2022) that would impact the project area. 2.ERP (Previously OEQC) Research was completed on March 29th, 2022 at the State of Hawaii Environmental Review Program (ERP) website, which as of July 2021 took the place of the former Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC) website. The ERP website provides Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) and Environmental Assessments (EA) available to the public. Projects from the ERP website in the surrounding area from 2017-2022 were reviewed. (1)Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Hale Ola O Mohouli is an expansion of the existing Mohouli Senior Residences located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street, approximately two miles southwest (SW) of the proposed development project site. The Hale Ola o Mohouli Affordable Residential Development TIAR (AECOM, 2021) was completed to analyze this expansion, which was reviewed to determine the potential future impact. The project proposes to add up to an additional 90 affordable residential units, and thus anticipates an additional 48 AM Peak Hour trips, and 68 PM Peak Hour trips. Due to its location two miles away, it can be assumed that the Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing expansion will have minimal impact on the Hawaiian Kingdom Brands project site, and therefore no trips from this facility were added. (2)Hilo Iron Works The Hilo Iron Works TIAR (SSFM, 2019) was reviewed to determine the potential future impact. The existing facility is located at the NW corner of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street, approximately 2,200 feet north of the proposed Hawaiian Kingdom Brands project site. The TIAR studied existing traffic within property. No new development was proposed within the property, and no significant change in vehicle trips was anticipated. Therefore, it can be assumed that traffic from this facility is already accounted for in the collected 2022 volumes, and therefore no additional trips from this facility were added. (3)Bank of Hawaii Bank of Hawaii is proposing a new facility at 1339 Kinoole Street in Hilo, Hawaii, approximately one mile SW of the proposed development. The Hilo Bank of Hawaii TIAR (SSFM, 2018) was completed to analyze this development, which was reviewed to determine the potential future impact. The project proposes to redevelop four existing single family dwelling units on the existing property, creating a 7,500 sf bank. The project's original complete build out was expected by 2020; however, as of March 2022, construction had yet to begin. It was anticipated that the project would add 53 additional AM Peak Hour trips, and 163 -21 - SSFM International additional PM Peak Hour trips. However, the majority of this generated traffic was projected to be added along Lanikaula Street. Therefore, due to minimal impact in the area surrounding the Hawaiian Kingdom Brands project site, no additional trips from this facility were added. (4)South Hilo Sanitary Landfill Closure The Traffic Assessment (TA) For The South Hilo Sanitary landfill (Wilson Okamoto, 2017) analyzed the traffic impacts projected as a result of closing the landfill (SHSL). With this closure, county waste trucks as well as commercial haulers will be diverted to the West Hawaii Sanitary Landfill (WHSL) located in Puuanahulu, 70-miles west of the existing site. These vehicles are projected to be rerouted to the WHSL via Saddle Road, with an anticipated 29 additional AM Peak Hour trips, and 12 additional PM Peak Hour trips. As of June 2020, the SHSL closure was nearly complete. Therefore, it can be assumed that traffic impacts from this closure were accounted for in the collected 2022 volumes, and thus no additional volume adjustments are needed. (5)Island Naturals Complex COH planners noted that Island Naturals Properties, LLC applied for a special management area (SMA) use permit in April 2021, proposing to construct a 67,685 sf retail and office complex at the NW corner of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street on an existing 4.045-acre undeveloped lot, as detailed in the County of Hawaii Planning Department Background Report -SMA 21-000079 (COH Planning Department, April 2021). The applicant currently operates a grocery store within a nearby strip mall in the Hilo Shopping Center located at the SE corner of the intersection of Kekuanaoa Street and Kilauea Avenue, approximately 0.25-miles away from the proposed site. The developer is looking to relocate their grocery store to this new site and develop a one-stop commercial retail and office center with other businesses aimed at providing goods and everyday services for both residents and visitors. The phasing of the development is still undecided; however, the applicant forecasts that full-buildout is anticipated by 2026. No TIAR was completed as a part of this development's application. However, as a part of the permit, the applicant projects that the development will generate at least 50 vehicular movements during the peak hours. The developer also noted that retail operations will generally start post AM peak hour, around 10:00 AM, and that 50% of the applicant's employees begin work after 8:30 AM. It was also noted that at least 75% of employees leave before 3:30 PM and/or after 6:30 PM. With no TIAR and no specific trip generation or distribution provided for the development, the traffic impact specifics cannot be accurately predicted. It should be noted that trip generation done based solely upon the proposed land uses documented in the application add up to 282 additional AM peak hour trips and 486 additional PM peak hour trips (see Table 6). The application estimates these total number of peak hour trips to be lower due to various trip reduction factors that are not explicitly explained. It is noted that due to the existing location of the grocery store, these trips are largely already in place within the surrounding roadway network. This would mean that cumulative trip generation may be limited to the other developments proposed within this complex. However, even without the trips resulting from the grocery store, total AM and PM peak hour trips result in 208 and 226 vehicles, respectively. It should be noted that the trip generation anticipated -22 - SSFM International by the Kanaka Beverage & Cafe development (to be discussed in a later section) is projected to be significantly lower than the unadjusted trip generation as part of the Island Naturals development. Table 6: Island Naturals Complex Trip Generation Phase/Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Area (1000 SF) ITE Land Use In Out Total In Out Total Phase 1 Island Naturals Store 26.0 850-Supermarket 44 30 74 130 130 260 Office Space 8.9 710-General Office Building 18 3 21 4 18 22 Total: 62 33 95 134 148 282 Phase 2 Drive-Through Restaurant 3.0 934-Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through 68 66 134 52 47 99 Total: 68 66 134 52 47 99 Phase 3 Retail Space 10.3 822-Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)18 11 29 40 40 80 Office Space 10.3 710-General Office Building 21 3 24 4 21 25 Total: 39 14 53 44 61 105 Total of All Phases: 169 113 282 230 256 486 As a part of the buildout of the site, the Island Naturals Complex developer is proposing two full movement access driveways off of Mililani Street as well as Hualani Street. The proposal predicts that splitting left turn movements between these side-street accesses will help reduce backup. The developer is also proposing two right-in right-out (RIRO) driveways off Kekuanaoa Street, which they state will eliminate or minimize back up of traffic along Kekuanaoa Avenue. In response to the Island Naturals Complex proposal, the COH Department of Public Works (DPW) recommended they install a left-turn lane in the EB direction at the intersection of Kekuanaoa Street and Mililani Street; however, the applicant believes traffic impacts to the surrounding roadways will be reduced by the limited aforementioned accesses, and the status of this additional left-turn lane is unclear. No other known improvements are planned along the surrounding roadway network as a result of this proposed development. Without a TIAR detailing more specific trip generation and distribution, future traffic volumes for this development cannot be accurately forecast and distributed as part of this report. 3.Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii The Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan (HOOT, 2014) lists various Roadway Infrastructure Potential Solutions on corridors throughout the study area, including: •Hawaii Route 11 between Hawaii Route 19/Kalanianaole Avenue and Makalika Street: Proposed improvements include providing an additional two travel lanes with turn lanes at major intersections, bicycle facilities and sidewalks. •Hawaii Route 19 at Manono Street: Proposed intersection operational improvements, although it is not specified what these specifically entail. •Manono Street between Hawaii Route 19 and Kawili Street Proposed improvements include installing bike lanes. •Kekuanaoa Street between Kilauea Avenue and Hawaii Route 11 - 23 - SSFM International Proposed improvements include providing an additional two travel lanes with separate turning lanes at major intersections, as well as bike lanes. No specific construction dates were listed for these improvements. As such, for consideration of the worst-case scenario that utilizes the existing lane configurations, it was assumed that they will not be constructed in the near future and therefore were not applied to future analysis years. B.Volumes 1.Background Growth Various transportation plans and historical traffic volumes were considered when determining the background growth volume for the surrounding region. Covid-19 impacts to traffic volumes were considered as well. The Statewide Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the State of Hawaii (CH2M, 2014) forecasts a compounded annual increase in traffic volumes of 1.28% between 2007 and 2035 in the South Hilo planning district (see Table 7). Table 7: Traffic Forecast -Daily Vehicles Trips in South Hilo Year Statewide Federal-Aid Highway 2035 Transportation Plan Population Daily Vehicle Trips 2007 47,620 157,290 2035 50,540 224,570 Growth Rate 0.21% 1.28% Historical HOOT traffic volumes along Manono Street varied between 2013-2022, with recorded traffic volumes being higher in 2013 (10,723) than pre-pandemic volumes in 2019 (10,320). Conservatively, a 1.28% growth rate, to align with the transportation plan forecast, was applied to high-volume regional traffic movements (identified with red arrows), as shown in Figure 9. Traffic impacts resulting from regional or other projects not identified in the STIP and ERP are assumed to be included in the 1.28% annual growth rate. Figures 10-12 show the resulting Future Without Project volumes forecast for 2027, 2032, and 2042, respectively. -24 - Lihiwai Street 1 "-)!� - { _/ s \i( - � � ✓!"-. �7---u---- � r �jr \ -.- ,J _._ -�ir\ Legend # Analyzed Intersection (';\ Signalized \V Intersection Hawaii Route 11 )!� "- { s _/ \i(- � Unsignalized Intersection Figure 9: Study Intersection Regional Traffic Volume Movements - 25 - SSFM International , Stop Sign 17 (18] .)' 6(9)- 6(13]� '\__ 7(9]553 [501] ✓ 5[4] u , _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ 17(18] .)' � ! ( 422 [573] ➔ ';::;"'j."';:. --�5 [16] � Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection @ -"' a, a, .... --..... NO "'r--..._✓"--�i--u � t 10 [8] .)' NI-' oO .... 0 - 0 0 ,_._52 (109] � N 00 "' .... -� Unsignalized Intersection 89 (106] 294 (420] 32 [61] � , Stop Sign SSFM International XX [XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) Figure 10: Future (2027) Without Project Peak Hour Volumes - 26 - 17 [18]/'6 [9]- 6 [13]), \_,_ 12(9] -818 (6871 ✓57 (64] \_,_ 7 [9] 581 [525] ✓5[4] U1----,,...- 17[18] /' � ! ( 450(611] ➔ -;:;,.-;:; --� 5 [16]), Legend # Analyzed Intersection 0 Signalized Intersection @ - a, a, a, ,,,- 00 N st U') ..... --✓"--"'"""i -,.U 10 [8] /' 52 (109] � � t N ,_. 00 .... -.J _ ... ..,._N 00 \,0 "' -� Unsignalized Intersection , Stop Sign SSFM International XX[XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) Figure 11: Future (2032) Without Project Peak Hour Volumes - 27 - �o� --N <O 0� 0 N ;' i 88 [96] 606 [742]--+ 374[502] � 17 [18] /' 6 [9)--+ 6[13)� Legend # Analyzed Intersection \,__ 12(9] �i � "' "' "'W ._. 00 Ul __ -c..n.i:. w .c::. u, ..,. __ 0 ;,:, It> Signalized Intersection @ N _ .... a, .... m-o NII> "' <O ✓ i-4--"�-----tU 10 [8) /' 52 (109) "'. Unsignalized Intersection 89 [106) 383 [541) 32 (61) � , Stop Sign SSFM International XX [XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) Figure 12: Future (2042) Without Project Peak Hour Volumes - 28 - C.Future Without Project LOS 1.Future (2027) Without Project Conditions SSFM International Future (2027) Without Project LOS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software. Table 8 shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection, with the shaded rows indicating the overall intersection delay (applicable at signalized intersections only). Movements that operated at LOS E/F or v/c � 1.0 are highlighted in yellow. Synchro reports for the Future (2027) Without Project conditions can be found in Appendix D. Table 8: Future (2027) Without Project Conditions AM PM Intersection Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 20.2 -C 24.0 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 13.2 0.28 B 15.5 0.29 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 15.8 0.38 B 20.2 0.47 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 19.1 0.52 B 29.0 0.72 C Hawaii Route 19WB Left 12.1 0.17 B 15.2 0.23 B Hawaii Route 19WBThrough 18.7 0.56 B 21.1 0.51 C Hawaii Route 19WB Right 13.2 0.02 B 16.0 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 26.6 0.62 C 27.8 0.73 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.4 0.36 C 22.2 0.22 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.8 0.08 C 27.9 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.0 0.74 D 37.8 0.77 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 20.8 0.52 C 21.7 0.40 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - - - - - Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - - - - - Piilani Street EB Left-Right 21.7 0.25 C 22.6 0.42 C Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.01 A 8.2 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 22.8 0.16 C 24.0 0.22 C Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 18.1 0.37 C 22.3 0.43 C Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 31.1 -C 31.3 -C Manono Street NB Left 21.3 0.25 C 19.8 0.15 B Manono Street NB Through-Right 31.8 0.65 C 26.9 0.50 C Manono Street SB Left 22.1 0.28 C 20.1 0.25 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 29.6 0.58 C 30.8 0.65 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 25.1 0.39 C 23.1 0.36 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 28.0 0.58 C 40.1 0.83 D Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.1 0.08 B 25.8 0.40 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 38.7 0.83 D 31.9 0.68 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 24.0 0.15 C 16.9 0.08 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 18.3 0.16 C 13.1 0.12 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 8.9 0.02 A 8.5 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.01 A 8.7 0.00 A -29 - SSFM International (1)Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (2)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (3)Manono Street & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (4)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (5)Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. 2.Future (2027) Without Project Mitigation No further mitigation is needed at any intersection for the Future (2027) Without Project conditions. 3.Future (2032) Without Project Conditions Future (2032) Without Project LOS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software. Table 9 shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection, with the shaded rows indicating the overall intersection delay (applicable at signalized intersections only). Movements that operated at LOSE/F or v/c � 1.0 are highlighted in yellow. Synchro reports for the Future (2032) Without Project conditions can be found in Appendix D. (1)Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (2)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (3)Manono Street & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. -30 - SSFM International (4)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (5)Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. Table 9: Future (2032) Without Project Conditions AM Intersection Delay v/c (sec/veh) Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 20.6 - Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 13.6 0.30 Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 16.1 0.40 Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 19.9 0.55 Hawaii Route 19WB Left 12.2 0.18 Hawaii Route 19WBThrough 19.3 0.60 Hawaii Route 19WB Right 13.2 0.02 Manono Street NB Left 28.3 0.67 Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.4 0.36 Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.8 0.08 Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.0 0.74 Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 22.6 0.55 Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - Piilani Street EB Left-Right 23.8 0.27 Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.2 0.01 Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.2 0.05 Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 24.3 0.18 Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 19.1 0.38 Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 33.2 - Manono Street NB Left 21.7 0.27 Manono Street NB Through-Right 33.1 0.69 Manono Street SB Left 22.6 0.29 Manono Street SB Through-Right 30.7 0.62 Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 26.9 0.43 Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 29.3 0.63 Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.5 0.09 Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 43.1 0.87 Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 26.0 0.16 Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 19.4 0.17 Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.0 0.02 Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.4 0.01 4.Future (2032) Without Project Mitigation PM Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) C 25.2 - B 16.2 0.30 B 21.1 0.51 B 32.4 0.78 B 15.9 0.24 B 22.1 0.55 B 16.4 0.02 C 27.6 0.74 C 21.9 0.22 C 28.3 0.08 D 38.3 0.77 Unsignalized (TWSC) C 24.0 0.43 - - - - - - C 24.9 0.45 Unsignalized (TWSC) A 8.3 0.01 A 8.2 0.07 C 25.6 0.23 C 24.0 0.46 C 33.0 - C 21.1 0.17 C 28.6 0.54 C 21.2 0.26 C 34.2 0.72 C 22.8 0.36 C 42.2 0.86 B 26.5 0.42 D 31.7 0.70 Unsignalized (TWSC) D 17.9 0.09 C 13.5 0.12 A 8.6 0.02 A 8.8 0.00 LOS C B C C B C B C C C D C - - C A A D C C C C C C C D C C C B A A No further mitigation is needed at any intersection for the Future (2032) Without Project Conditions. -31- 5.Future (2042) Without Project Conditions SSFM International Future (2042) Without Project LOS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software. Table 10 shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection, with the shaded rows indicating the overall intersection delay (applicable at signalized intersections only). Movements that operated at LOSE/F or v/c � 1.0 are highlighted in yellow. Synchro reports for the Future (2042) Without Project conditions can be found in Appendix D. Table 10: Future (2042) Without Project Conditions AM PM I nte rsecti on Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/lihiwai Street 23.3 -C 28.7 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 16.2 0.36 B 17.7 0.35 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 18.6 0.47 B 23.2 0.58 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 24.3 0.65 C 43.5 0.89 D Hawaii Route 19WB Left 13.9 0.20 B 17.2 0.28 B Hawaii Route 19 WB Through 23.2 0.71 C 24.5 0.63 C Hawaii Route 19 WB Right 14.6 0.02 B 17.2 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 27.7 0.68 C 29.6 0.78 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 24.4 0.32 C 21.9 0.21 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 28.1 0.09 C 29.5 0.08 C lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 37.8 0.75 D 40.1 0.78 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 28.3 0.63 D 30.8 0.51 D Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - - - - - Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - - - - - Piilani Street EB left-Right 30.7 0.34 D 32.7 0.54 D Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.4 0.01 A 8.5 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.05 A 8.4 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 28.1 0.20 D 30.9 0.27 D Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 21.9 0.43 C 29.7 0.53 D Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 39.3 -D 40.4 -D Manono Street NB Left 23.9 0.31 C 23.4 0.21 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 39.1 0.79 D 31.5 0.62 C Manono Street SB left 25.1 0.34 C 22.7 0.30 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 35.7 0.73 D 43.6 0.85 D Kekuanaoa Street EB left 30.7 0.50 C 23.6 0.39 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 31.3 0.71 C 56.7 0.97 E Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.7 0.10 B 31.6 0.52 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 53.9 0.96 D 33.6 0.76 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 32.2 0.20 D 20.4 0.11 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 22.5 0.20 C 14.5 0.14 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.3 0.02 A 8.7 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.6 0.01 A 9.1 0.01 A - 32 - SSFM International (1)Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (2)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (3)Manono Street & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (4)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street At the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street, the EB through-right lane resulted in poor LOS E during the PM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.97). With increased traffic volumes along both Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street, due to forecasted background growth, LOS deteriorates over time compared to the Existing (2022) conditions. All other movements at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (5)Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. 6.Future (2042) Without Project Mitigation Potential mitigation was considered at Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street for the Future (2042) Without Project Conditions. (1)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street Under the existing traffic signal configuration, the Kekuanaoa Street EB through-right lane is projected to operate at LOSE during the PM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.97). De lay for this lane will increase compared to the Existing (2022) conditions due to continual background growth along both Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street. Currently, each approach has a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through-right lane, with each Kekuanaoa Street leg being 45-feet wide. With excess roadway width present at the intersection, dedicated right turn lanes can be marked along Kekuanaoa Street in both the EB and WB directions, allowing the existing through-right lanes to be converted to through-only lanes. By separating turning movements, intersection capacity will increase, improving the overall LOS, which can be seen in Table 11. Synchro reports for the Future (2042) Without Project Mitigation can be found in Appendix E. -33 - SSFM International Table 11: Future (2042) Without Project Mitigation LOS Comparison at Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street AM PM Traffic Signal (Existing Lane Configuration) Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 39.3 -D 40.4 -D Manono Street NB Left 23.9 0.31 C 23.4 0.21 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 39.1 0.79 D 31.5 0.62 C Manono Street SB Left 25.1 0.34 C 22.7 0.30 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 35.7 0.73 D 43.6 0.85 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 30.7 0.50 C 23.6 0.39 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 31.3 0.71 C 56.7 0.97 E Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.7 0.10 B 31.6 0.52 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 53.9 0.96 D 33.6 0.76 C Traffic Signal (Additional Right-Turn Lanes along AM PM Delay Delay Kekuanaoa Street) (sec/veh) v/c LOS (sec/veh) v/c LOS Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 35.8 -D 34.1 -C Manono Street NB Left 23.9 0.31 C 23.4 0.21 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 39.1 0.79 D 31.5 0.62 C Manono Street SB Left 25.1 0.34 C 22.7 0.30 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 35.7 0.73 D 43.6 0.85 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 27.9 0.45 C 22.1 0.36 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through 29.0 0.64 C 40.0 0.85 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Right 19.3 0.06 B 19.9 0.11 B Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.1 0.09 B 25.9 0.42 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through 45.5 0.90 D 30.4 0.69 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Right 19.2 0.05 B 19.4 0.07 B Therefore, as part of mitigation for the Future (2042) Without Project conditions, it is recommended to consider reconfiguring the EB and WB approaches along Kekuanaoa Street to have dedicated right turn lanes, allowing the existing through-right lanes to be converted to through-only lanes. -34- SSFM International IV.FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS The proposed development construction is anticipated to begin by early 2026, with completion expected by early 2027. Therefore, it is assumed that all project-related trips will be in place for all three Future With Project scenarios (2027, 2032, and 2042). D.Future With Project Generated Volumes 1.Project Related Volumes The expected traffic from the proposed project was determined using the following four-step methodology: trip generation, trip distribution, modal choice, and route assignment. (1)Trip Generation Trip generation was calculated using rates from Trip Generation, 11th Edition (ITE, September 2021) which is standard traffic engineering practice. The following land uses were considered for use with the proposed project: •Manufacturing (ITE Land Use Code 140) facilities are defined as areas where raw materials or parts are converted into finished products. Sizes and types of activity vary between facilities. This land use accounts for the manufacturing facility itself, as well as associated offices, warehouses, and research areas. •Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window {ITE Land Use Code 934) are defined as restaurants with a large drive-through and carry-out clientele, with high turnover rates for any eat-in customers. The resulting trip generation rates for the proposed development are provided in Table 12. Table 12: Land Use Development Trip Generation Rates Land Use Code ITE Independent Variable AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Equation In% Out% Equation In% Out% Manufacturing 140 lOOOSq. Ft. GFA T = 0.61 (X) + 9.54 76 24 T = 0.87 (X) -17.50 31 69 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through 934 lOOOSq. Ft. GFA T=44.61(X) 51 49 T=33.03(X) 52 48 Window Trip Generation, 11th Edition (ITE, September 2021) also provides average pass-by rates to be used for retail or commercial developments. Pass-by trips are characterized as trips that are made by traffic currently passing the site on an adjacent street or roadway. Pass-by rates for a Fast-Food Restaurant With Drive-Through are assumed to be applicable during the PM peak hour only (see Table 13). Table 13: Pass-By-Rate (Trip Reduction) at Fast-Food Restaurant Land Use Code Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive Through Window ITE Code -Average Pass-By-Rate (Trip Reduction) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 55.0"/o The resulting estimated trips expected from the development were calculated and are shown in Table 14. - 35 - SSFM International Table 14: Project Related Development Phasing and Trips Generated 2024 Manufacturing 140 30 lOOOSq. Ft. GFA 21 7 28 3 6 9 2024 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 934 1.8 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 41 39 80 30 29 59 Trip Reduction (Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window) -16 -16 -32 Totals 62 46 108 17 19 36 (2)Trip Distribution/ Assignment Project related trips were distributed/assigned along the four primary roadways in the surrounding area (Hawaii Route 19, Hawaii Route 11, Kekuanaoa Street, and Manono Street) based on their two-directional ADTs. These ADTs were based on information sourced from the 2018 Highway Performance Monitoring System Roads for Hawaii GIS Database (see Table 15). 2018 data was used to reflect pre-Covid traffic patterns as 2019 data was not available. It was assumed that project related trips would utilize these four local roadways in a manner similar with the 2018 traffic distributions. HPMS 2018 volumes can be seen in Appendix A. Table 15: HPMS 2018 Roadway Volumes HPMS 2018 G/5 Hawaii Route 19 (at Manono) 16,800 25% Hawaii Route 11 (at Piilani) 24,900 38% Kekuanaoa Street (at Mililani and Kekuanaoa) 13,700 21% Manono Street (at Kekuanaoa) 10,300 16% Total 65,700 100% *Source: 2018 Highway Performance Monitoring System Roads for Hawaii GIS Database Based on the ADT assessment: •25% of project related trips were distributed/assigned along Hawaii Route 19 via Manono Street. At the intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street, trips were distrusted based on the 2022 intersection turning movement volumes. It was assumed that an insignificant percent of traffic would from the north leg of the intersection (Lihiwai Street) due to the minimal development north of the intersection. Therefore, no traffic was distributed/assigned along this leg of the intersection. •38% of project related trips were distributed/assigned along Hawaii Route 11 via Piilani Street. At the intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street, trips were distributed based on the 2022 intersection turning movement volumes. •21% of project related trips were distrusted/assigned along Kekuanaoa Street via both Manono Street and Mililani Street. It was assumed that no project related trips would be coming from/going towards Airport Road and Hilo Airport. Additionally, all project related trips travelling on Hawaii Route 11 were assumed be distributed/assigned to the site via Piilani Street. Therefore, all project related trips along Kekuanaoa Street were assumed to be coming from/heading towards the west. Of the 21% of project related trips along Kekuanaoa Street, half were assumed to travel along Mililani Street, while the remaining half were assumed to travel along Mano no Street. This assumption was made as Kekuanaoa - 36 - SSFM International Street and Manono Street is a signalized intersection, while Kekuanaoa Street and Mililani Street is an unsignalized intersection. Vehicles are estimated to use both corridors dependent on observed traffic at the signalized intersection. •16% of project related trips were distrusted/assigned along the southern portion of Manono Street, which later continues as Kawili Street. This roadway may likely be used by students at the University of Hawaii at Hilo, located on Kawili Street, as well as by some residents in the single-family homes located south of Puainako Street. Figure 13 shows the forecasted project related trips at the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours which are expected to align with the calculated trips and proposed uses of the development. (3)Modal Choice To assume the worst-case conditions for traffic, all project related external trips were assumed to be by private vehicle only, as opposed to considering some trips be taken by foot, bike, or bus. This aligns with the limited multimodal infrastructure and limited transit use in the area. E.Future With Project Volumes Future With Project conditions were calculated through the following methods: •Future (2027) With Project (see Figure 14) is a sum of Future (2027) Without Project (see Figure 10) and the additional site generated trips expected to be produced by the development (see Figure 13). •Future (2032) With Project (See Figure 15) is a sum of Future (2032) Without Project (see Figure 11) and the additional site generated trips expected to be produced by the development (see Figure 13). •Future (2042) With Project (See Figure 16) is a sum of Future (2042) Without Project (see Figure 12) and the additional site generated trips expected to be produced by the development (see Figure 13). -37 - �---oo� "a"o✓ i \. 12 [5] ,/ 17[7)--+ 12 (5) "\ Legend # Analyzed Intersection :::c 0 C: -�-�,;;�if t;; [O] 24 [6] [O] f ,_. 0 0 "' ---oo�-- Signalized Intersection @ �£ 3 [OJ 15 [7] Unsignalized Intersection � t ,I �� -o�-"\ , Stop Sign SSFM International XX [XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) Figure 13: Kanaka Beverage & Cafe Project Related Trips - 38 - 29 [23]/ 23 [16]_. 18 (18)". \__ 12 [9] +----767 [645] ✓60[65] s �if \__ 7 [9) +-558 [503) ✓ 5[4] u f 24 [20) )' � ..,. co 429[575) ➔ 5[16) \ Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection @ -m 0 a, <t --N r-- 0I/') r----=�'-------'-i ---1 u � i 13 [8) )' 67 (116] '. Iv .... Iv 0 00 - co ,__._ w co ......-,';:! Unsignalized Intersection Hawaii 96 [108) 294 [420) 32 [61) '. � Stop Sign SSFM International XX [XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour} Figure 14: Future (2027) With Project Peak Hour Volumes - 39 - '\_ 7[9] +-586 [527] ✓ 5[4] u-�-.,,..._ 24 [20] ,/' � ! (456 [613) ➔ ,:; ,.-,:; --� 5 [16] "\ Legend # Analyzed Intersection 0 Signalized Intersection @ -"' 0"' st -- 00 ,.._ st U') ,.._ --✓"'-�i ---t u 13 [8] ,/' 67 (116] "\ Unsignalized Intersection 96 [108] 322 [458) 32 (61] "\ , Stop Sign SSFM International XX [XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM) (veh/hour) Figure 15: Future (2032) With Project Peak Hour Volumes - 40 - m ............. \._ 7[9) 647 [579) � m"' ✓ 5 [4] ✓ i \. u -�---=- �NO --- 24 1201 .,! � l t 517 [696) ➔ ,:;'j;;. --� 5 [16]), Legend # Analyzed Intersection Signalized Intersection @ _....,0 ..... � --o r- Lil Lil co -'✓"---'-i ---1 u � t 13 [8] _,J N ... ...,..., 67 (116] ), 0N _o ,...._ w U) .... 00 -� -;::; :;; m 25 [39) � ';;:; � 512 [442) �"' 1/l r-N r-✓ 25 (95] -✓ i \.®� i �·96 [108] / '-' � ,. 383 (541] ::::_ "' u, � ,::; 'j; 32 (61)), -�2?. SSFM International Unsignalized Intersection , Stop Sign XX [XX] Peak Hour Volumes AM[PM] (veh/hour) Figure 16: Future (2042) With Project Peak Hour Volumes - 41- 1.Future (2027) With Project Conditions SSFM International Future (2027) With Project LOS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software. Table 16 shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection, with the shaded rows indicating the overall intersection delay (applicable at signalized intersections only). Movements that operated at LOSE/For v/c 2: 1.0 are highlighted in yellow. Synchro reports for the Future {2027) With Project conditions can be found in Appendix F. Table 16: Future (2027) With Project Conditions AM PM Intersection Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 20.4 -C 24.3 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 13.2 0.28 B 15.7 0.29 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 15.9 0.38 B 20.5 0.47 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 19.7 0.54 B 29.8 0.74 C Hawaii Route 19WB Left 12.1 0.18 B 15.5 0.23 B Hawaii Route 19WBThrough 18.7 0.56 B 21.4 0.51 C Hawaii Route 19WB Right 13.2 0.02 B 16.2 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 27.6 0.65 C 27.1 0.73 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.5 0.37 C 22.1 0.22 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 26.8 0.08 C 28.1 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.0 0.74 D 38.1 0.77 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 22.6 0.57 C 22.2 0.41 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - - - - - Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - - - - - Piilani Street EB Left-Right 25.3 0.34 D 23.4 0.44 C Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.03 A 8.3 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.1 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 32.6 0.42 D 27.6 0.32 D Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 26.5 0.53 D 25.5 0.49 D Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 32.0 -C 31.4 -C Manono Street NB Left 20.7 0.25 C 19.9 0.15 B Manono Street NB Through-Right 30.9 0.65 C 27.0 0.50 C Manono Street SB Left 21.5 0.27 C 20.1 0.25 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 29.0 0.58 C 31.1 0.66 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 27.5 0.44 C 23.2 0.37 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 29.3 0.60 C 40.1 0.83 D Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.8 0.08 B 25.8 0.40 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 42.0 0.85 D 31.9 0.68 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 25.4 0.15 D 17.0 0.09 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 18.5 0.18 C 13.2 0.13 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.0 0.03 A 8.5 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.4 0.01 A 8.7 0.00 A - 42 - SSFM International (1)Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (2)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (3)Manono Street & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (4)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (5)Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. 2.Future (2027) With Project Mitigation No further mitigation is needed at any intersection for the Future (2027) With Project Conditions. 3.Future (2032) With Project Conditions Future (2032) With Project LOS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software. Table 17 shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection, with the shaded rows indicating the overall intersection delay (applicable at signalized intersections only). Movements that operated at LOSE/F or v/c � 1.0 are highlighted in yellow. Synchro reports for the Future (2032) With Project Conditions can be found in Appendix F. (1)Hawaii Route 19 at Manono Street/Lihiwai Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (2)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. -43 - SSFM International Table 17: Future (2032) With Project Conditions AM PM Intersection Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 21.3 -C 25.4 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 14.1 0.31 B 16.4 0.31 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 16.8 0.41 B 21.4 0.51 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 21.2 0.58 C 33.3 0.79 C Hawaii Route 19WB Left 12.7 0.19 B 16.0 0.25 B Hawaii Route 19WBThrough 20.0 0.61 B 22.3 0.55 C Hawaii Route 19WB Right 13.7 0.02 B 16.6 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 27.8 0.66 C 27.5 0.75 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 25.1 0.35 C 21.9 0.22 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 27.3 0.08 C 28.4 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 36.6 0.75 D 38.6 0.77 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 25.0 0.61 D 24.6 0.45 C Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - - - - - Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - - - - - Piilani Street EB Left-Right 30.2 0.40 D 25.9 0.48 D Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.03 A 8.3 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.2 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 36.3 0.46 E 29.8 0.34 D Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 29.3 0.57 D 27.7 0.51 D Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 33.7 -C 33.2 -C Manono Street NB Left 22.1 0.27 C 21.2 0.17 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 33.9 0.71 C 28.7 0.55 C Manono Street SB Left 23.0 0.30 C 21.2 0.27 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 31.6 0.65 C 34.7 0.73 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 28.0 0.46 C 22.9 0.37 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through-Right 29.3 0.63 C 42.4 0.87 D Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.5 0.09 B 26.5 0.42 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through-Right 43.4 0.88 D 31.8 0.70 C Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 27.9 0.17 D 18.0 0.09 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 19.7 0.19 C 13.6 0.13 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.1 0.03 A 8.6 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.5 0.01 A 8.9 0.00 A (3)Manono Street & Piilani Street At the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street, the EB left-through-right lane will operate poorly at LOSE during the AM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.46). With increased traffic volumes along Manono Street due to forecasted background growth, LOS will deteriorate compared to the previously analysis year, Future (2027) With Project conditions. All other movements at the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. -44- SSFM International (4)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (5)Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. 4.Future (2032) With Project Mitigation Potential mitigation was considered at Manono Street and Piilani Street for the Future (2032) With Project conditions. (1)Manono Street & Piilani Street (i) Traffic Signal The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (FHWA, 2009) was used to perform a traffic signal warrant analysis at the intersection. The MUTCD states that a traffic control signal should not be installed unless one or more of these warrants are met. However, it also states that, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control system." The MUTCD states that the Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant is only applicable at locations such as at a factory or school where shift changes or school hours cause a significant amount of traffic over a short period of time. It is not assumed that traffic volumes needed for the Eight-Hour and Four-Hour Traffic Signal warrants can be accurately forecasted to determine future traffic volumes in a manner similar to future peak hour traffic volumes. Therefore, the Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant was the only warrant available for a future analysis. To satisfy this warrant and merit the consideration of installing a traffic control signal, volume thresholds must fall above the applicable curve for any of the three peak hours throughout the day. Note that for this intersection, the lower curve (1 Lane & 1 Lane) was used for analysis. Table 18 shows the approach traffic volumes used for analysis at Manono Street and Piilani Street. After plotting the corresponding traffic volumes, neither peak hour fell above the minimum (see Figure 17). Therefore, a traffic signal installation at the intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street was not deemed appropriate at this time. Table 18: Peak Hour Warrant Analysis for Future (2032) With Project Conditions at Manono Street and Piilani Street Time 7:30 -8:30 AM 3:45-4:45 PM Manono Street at Piilani Street Major Approach Volume 779 889 -45 - Minor Approach Volume 218 196 Pass Peak Hour Warrant? No No SSFM International MINOR STREET HIGHER-VOLUME PPROACH VPH 600 500 400 300 200 100 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 7"--.::::1=�....;;,:=---+----l 150" l-_j_ _ _j_ _ _j__-!.-_-I-_--L--_ _j_ _ _j____:���--+--=:::t:::::::i.,,j._....j 1 oo· 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET -TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHESVEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-streetapproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lowerthreshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 17: Peak Hour Volume Thresholds at Manono Street and Piilani Street (2032 With Project) (ii)All-Way Stop Control Conversion of a TWSC intersection to All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) will reduce delay on the minor-street stop-controlled approaches; however, it will introduce additional delay along the major-street that would not be present in existing TWSC conditions. The MUTCD provides criteria for implementing AWSC at an intersection, which are shown below, along with their applicability: ■Minimum volumes: 1)The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vph for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2)The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3)If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in the previous two statements. (/t is not assumed that Existing (2022) traffic volumes can be accurately forecasted with background growth rate to determine future traffic volumes in a manner similar to future peak hour traffic volumes. As a result, this analysis was only done using the Future (2032) With Project peak hour volumes, as shown in Figure 15. As seen in Table 19, the vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches averaged over 300 vph, and the minor street combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume averaged at least 200 units over both peak hours. Therefore, the minimum volume criteria for implementing A WSC at the intersection was met when averaging the AM and PM peak hours.) -46 - SSFM International Table 19: Manono Street and Piilani Street Future (2032) With Project Peak Hour Volumes Major Street Minor Street Time Approach Volume Approach Volume 7:30 AM -8:30 AM 779 218 4:00 PM -5:00 PM 889 196 Hourly Average Volume 834 207 Table 20 shows the intersection results of Manono Street and Piilani Street as it would operate under AWSC. The EB left-through-right lane improved from LOS E (v/c ratio of 0.46) in its existing TWSC configuration to LOS B (v/c ratio of 0.18) in the AWSC configuration during the AM peak hour. All movements resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. Table 20: Manono Street and Piilani Street Future (2032) With Project Intersection Operations AM PM TWSC (Existing Configuration) Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 8.3 0.03 A 8.3 0.01 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.2 0.05 A 8.2 0.07 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 36.3 0.46 E 29.8 0.34 D Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 29.3 0.57 D 27.7 0.51 D AM PM AWSC Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 15.5 0.57 C 16.7 0.61 C Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 22.3 0.74 C 30.6 0.85 D Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 11.4 0.18 B 11.3 0.17 B Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 12.4 0.33 B 12.2 0.31 B By Future (2032) With Project conditions, it is recommended to consider reconfiguring the intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street to AWSC to mitigate excessive delay on the uncontrolled Piilani Street approaches. 5.Future (2042) With Project Conditions Future (2042) With Project LOS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software. The intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street was analyzed under AWSC conditions, as recommended and discussed in the Future (2032) With Project conditions. Additionally, the lane reconfiguration mitigative measures at Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street discussed in the Future (2042) Without Project analysis were assumed to be implemented by this time, and the following results are based off this preferred configuration. Table 21 shows the existing vehicular delay and LOS at each intersection, with the shaded rows indicating the overall intersection delay (applicable at signalized intersections only). Movements that operated at LOS E/F or v/c ;:: 1.0 are highlighted in yellow. Synchro reports for the Future (2042) With Project conditions can be found in Appendix F. -47 - SSFM International Table 21: Future {2042) With Project Conditions AM PM Intersection Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street 23.6 -C 29.1 -C Hawaii Route 19 EB Left 16.3 0.36 B 17.9 0.35 B Hawaii Route 19 EB Through 18.7 0.48 B 23.5 0.58 C Hawaii Route 19 EB Right 25.3 0.68 C 45.1 0.90 D Hawaii Route 19WB Left 14.0 0.21 B 17.4 0.28 B Hawaii Route 19WBThrough 23.3 0.71 C 24.7 0.63 C Hawaii Route 19WB Right 14.7 0.02 B 17.4 0.02 B Manono Street NB Left 28.7 0.70 C 29.4 0.78 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 24.4 0.33 C 21.9 0.21 C Lihiwai Street SB Left 28.1 0.09 C 29.7 0.08 C Lihiwai Street SB Through-Right 37.8 0.75 D 40.3 0.78 D Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Hawaii Route 11 NB Left 32.3 0.69 D 31.7 0.53 D Hawaii Route 11 NB Through - - - - Hawaii Route 11 SB Through-Right - - - - - - Piilani Street EB Left-Right 44.2 0.51 E 34.7 0.57 D Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (AWSC) Unsignalized (AWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 20.8 0.69 C 19.5 0.67 C Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 39.8 0.89 E 43.6 0.94 E Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 12.3 0.20 B 11.4 0.15 B Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 13.6 0.36 B 12.5 0.30 B Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street 36.6 -D 34.4 -C Manono Street NB Left 24.4 0.32 C 23.6 0.21 C Manono Street NB Through-Right 40.9 0.81 D 31.7 0.63 C Manono Street SB Left 25.7 0.35 C 22.8 0.30 C Manono Street SB Through-Right 37.0 0.75 D 44.8 0.86 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Left 29.1 0.49 C 22.2 0.37 C Kekuanaoa Street EB Through 29.1 0.65 C 40.2 0.86 D Kekuanaoa Street EB Right 19.3 0.06 B 19.9 0.11 B Kekuanaoa Street WB Left 18.1 0.09 B 25.9 0.42 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Through 45.7 0.91 D 30.4 0.69 C Kekuanaoa Street WB Right 19.2 0.05 B 19.4 0.07 B Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Unsignalized (TWSC) Unsignalized (TWSC) Mililani Street NB Left-Through-Right 34.7 0.21 D 20.6 0.11 C Mililani Street SB Left-Through-Right 22.9 0.22 C 14.5 0.14 B Kekuanaoa Street EB Left-Through-Right 9.4 0.03 A 8.8 0.02 A Kekuanaoa Street WB Left-Through-Right 8.7 0.01 A 9.1 0.01 A (1)Hawaii Route 19 & Manono Street/Lihiwai Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Hawaii Route 19 and Manono Street/Lihiwai Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (2)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street At the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street, the EB left-right lane will operate poorly at LOS E during the AM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.51). With increased traffic volumes along Hawaii -48 - SSFM International Route 11 due to forecasted background growth, LOS will deteriorate compared to the previous analysis year, Future (2032) With Project conditions. All other movements at the unsignalized intersection of Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (3)Manono Street & Piilani Street At the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street, even after implementation of AWSC as recommended in the Future (2032) With Project analysis, the SB left-through-right lane will operate poorly at LOSE during the AM and PM peak hours (v/c ratio of 0.89 and 0.94, respectively). With increased traffic volumes along Manono Street due to forecasted background growth, LOS will deteriorate compared to the previous analysis year, Future (2032) With Project conditions. All other movements at the unsignalized intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street resulted in appropriate LOS C or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (4)Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street The intersection and all movements at the signalized intersection of Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. (5)Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street All movements at the unsignalized intersection of Mililani Street and Kekuanaoa Street resulted in appropriate LOS Dor better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. 6.Future (2042) With Project Mitigation Potential mitigation was considered at Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street and at Manono Street and Piilani Street for the Future (2042) With Project conditions. (1)Hawaii Route 11 & Piilani Street Although the shared EB left-right lane at Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street is projected to operate poorly at LOS E (v/c ratio of 0.51) during the AM peak hour, traffic volumes along Piilani Street are not expected to significantly change from the previous analysis year, Future (2032) With Project conditions. However, EB left-turning movements at the intersection will experience higher overall delay, needing to find gaps in the SB traffic to cross three lanes, compared to EB right-turning movements, who only need to find gaps in the SB traffic to cross the nearest lane. EB left-turning volumes at the intersection are extremely low, with only 13 vehicles making this movement in the AM peak hour and 8 making it in the PM peak hour. The mainline movements along Hawaii Route 11 make up the majority of the intersection volume, all which operate at appropriate LOS D or better and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, the shared EB left-right lane is not approaching capacity, with a v/c ratio of only 0.51 during the AM peak hour, and 0.57 during the PM peak hour. It is recommended to monitor the intersection, but no mitigation is deemed appropriate at this time. (2)Manono Street & Piilani Street (i)Traffic Signal The MUTCD was used to perform a traffic signal warrant analysis at the intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street, similar to the analysis performed in the Future (2032) With Project conditions. Table 22 -49 - SSFM International shows the approach traffic volumes used for analysis at Manono Street and Piilani Street. After plotting the corresponding traffic volumes, neither peak hour fell above the minimum threshold (1 Lane & 1 Lane) (see Figure 18). Therefore, a traffic signal installation at the intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street was not deemed appropriate at this time. It is recommended to monitor the intersection, take future traffic counts, and re-run a traffic signal warrant (either an Eight-Hour or Four-Hour Warrant) into the future. Table 22: Peak Hour Warrant Analysis for Future (2042) With Project Conditions at Manono Street and Piilani Street 600 500 MINOR 400 STREET HIGHER-VOLUME 300 PPROACH-VPH 200 100 Time 7:30 -8:30 AM 3:45 -4:45 PM Manono Street at Piilani Street Major Approach Volume 855 987 Minor Approach Volume 218 196 Pass Peak Hour Warrant? No No Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 7""'--�-....,-:--+----1 150" 1--1-___j�___j _ _j _ _j _ _j_--+---+-����➔-=::::t==--� 100* 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET -TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHESVEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-streetapproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lowerthreshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 18: Peak Hour Volume Thresholds at Manono Street and Piilani Street (2042 With Project) (ii)Mini-Roundabout Mini-roundabouts share many commonalities as standard roundabouts in terms of their operational efficiency, intersection safety benefits, and traffic calming tendencies; however, unlike standard roundabouts, mini-roundabouts have a much more compact size, allowing them to be implemented at smaller intersections where there may be insufficient room for a standard roundabout. Additionally, the -50 - SSFM International center island within a mini-roundabout is typically fully traversable, allowing large heavy-vehicles to navigate the intersection without damaging the installation. FHWA released a technical summary on Mini Roundabouts (FHWA, 2010) detailing the benefits and constraints of mini-roundabouts, which can be seen in Table 23. Table 23: Mini-Roundabout Benefits and Constraints (FHWA) Benefit Descnpt1on and Constraining Factors A mini-roundabout can often be developed to fit within existing right- of-way constraints. Note that mini-roundabouts are generally not Compact Size recommended for intersections with more than four legs. However, in some cases there may be adequate spacing between legs to allow for two closely-spaced mini-roundabouts. A mini-roundabout may provide less delay for a critical movement or for an overall intersection in comparison to other intersection Operational Efficiency alternatives. However, as with all roundabout types, mini-roundabouts do not provide explicit priority to specific users such as trains, transit, or emergency vehicles. Mini-roundabouts have been used successfully in the U.K. to improve Traffic Safety safety at intersections with known crash problems, with reported crash rate reductions of approximately 30 percent as compared to signalized intersections. Designed properly, a mini-roundabout reduces speeds and can be implemented as part of a broader traffic calming scheme. The low- Traffic Calming speed environment also enhances the intersection for non-motorized users. However, mini-roundabouts cannot provide the same level of speed reduction as their larger counterparts and thus are less suited for roadways with speeds exceeding 30to 35 mph (SO to 55 km/h). A mini-roundabout can be used to provide efficient access to a new or existing development. However, in the cases of large trucks and other Access Management large vehicles, the diameter may be too small to accommodate U-turn maneuvers that would be readily accommodated at a larger roundabout. In comparison to full-size roundabouts, mini-roundabouts do not allow Aesthetics opportunities for landscaping in the central island. As with comparably sized traditional intersections, landscaping opportunities are limited to the periphery of the intersection. A mini-roundabout may offer an environmental benefit compared to Environmental Benefits conventional intersections through reduced delay, fuel consumption, and vehicle emissions. *Source: Mini-Roundabouts Technical Summary (FHWA, 2010} Operationally, FHWA recommends mini-roundabouts for intersections with total entering volumes no greater than 1,600 vehicles/hour (vph). Peak hour volumes at the Manono Street and Piilani Street intersection during the Future (2042) With Project conditions are 1,073 and 1,183 during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, both considerably below the recommended hourly capacity. At mini-roundabouts, the inscribed circular diameter (ICD), or the diagonally measured distance between the corners of the intersection, is typically between SO to 80 feet, while the central island is between 16 to 45 feet in diameter. The existing diagonal measurement between TMK parcels is approximately 65-70 feet with approximately 60 feet of paved travelway. This is an adequate width to reconfigure as a mini roundabout with a 5 feet shoulder on all sides. A conceptual rendering of a mini-roundabout at this intersection can be seen in Figure 19. -51 - SSFM International Manono Street Figure 19: Conceptual Mini-Roundabout at Manono Street and Piilani Street Mini-roundabouts have been implemented elsewhere on Hawaii island, including one at Halekii Street and Mamao Street in Kealakekua (see Figure 20). Figure 20: Mini Roundabout at Halekii Street and Mamao Street in Kealakekua - 52 - SSFM International Table 24 shows the intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street as it would operate with a mini roundabout. The SB left-through-right lane will improve from LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours (v/c ratio of 0.89 and 0.94, respectively) in AWSC configuration (recommended to be implemented in Future (2032) With Project) to LOS A in the mini-roundabout configuration. All movements resulted in appropriate LOS A and v/c < 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro reports for the Future (2042) With Project mitigation can be found in Appendix G. Table 24: Manono Street and Piilani Street Future (2042} With Project Intersection Operations AM PM AWSC (Proposed in Future [2032) With Project) Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Manono Street & Piilani Street Unsignalized (AWSC) Unsignalized (AWSC) Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 20.8 0.69 C 19.5 0.67 C Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 39.8 0.89 E 43.6 0.94 E Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 12.3 0.20 B 11.4 0.15 B Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 13.6 0.36 B 12.5 0.30 B AM PM Mini-Roundabout Delay v/c Delay v/c (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS Manono Street & Piilani Street 7.0 -A 7.0 -A Manono Street NB Left-Through-Right 7.0 0.37 A 6.0 0.36 A Manono Street SB Left-Through-Right 8.0 0.48 A 8.0 0.50 A Piilani Street EB Left-Through-Right 6.0 0.14 A 6.0 0.10 A Piilani Street WB Left-Through-Right 6.0 0.21 A 6.0 0.18 A By Future (2042) With Project conditions, it is recommended to consider reconfiguring the intersection of Manono Street and Piilani Street to a mini-roundabout. Alternatively, it is recommended to take traffic counts and monitor the intersection into the future for potential signal warrants passing. -53 - SSFM International V.SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed use is consistent with the property class "Industrial" and zoning "ML-20 Limited Industrial District" and is a three-floor self-storage warehouse with accompanying restrooms and elevators to serve the tenants. The design includes two porte-cochere on either end, North and South, to allow for large trucks and ADA parking stalls to park under roofed shelter and load/unload to the storage warehouse. The conceptual floor plan includes 88 storage units per floor for a total of 264 storage units within the warehouse. The self-storage warehouse schematic site plan includes 24' wide two-way access driveways at Piilani Street and Mililani Street. The site plan provides for 28 total full size parking stalls including 2 ADA van accessible stalls. The site plan also provides for seven 12x50 foot loading zones for customer convenience. The schematic design is three floors (12'-0" ground floor, 10'-0" floors 2 and 3 for a total height of 41 '-8" which is compliant with the zoning height limit of 45'-0". The schematic design aesthetic is meant to evoke the 1920's era of Hilo Town. This TIAR analyzed traffic conditions for the Existing (2022) conditions, as well as Future Without and Future With Project conditions corresponding to five (2027), ten (2032), and twenty (2042) years into the future. Anticipated future traffic growth and trips resulting from surrounding area development were included in Future Without as well as the Future With conditions. Additionally, the /TE Trip Generation, 11th Edition was used to determine the number of project generated trips expected based on the development size. Five study intersections which projected to add 3% or greater traffic to their forecasted volumes were analyzed, per HOOT standard practice. In the Existing (2022) conditions, all intersections and individual lane movements operate with appropriate LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Similarly, all intersections and individual lane movements are projected to operate with appropriate LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours for the Future (2027) and Future (2032) Without Project conditions. Concurrent with the Future (2042) Without Project conditions, it is projected that the EB through-right lane at Manono Street and Kekuanaoa Street will operate at LOSE during PM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.97). With excess roadway width present at the intersection, it is recommended to consider reconfiguring both the EB and WB approaches to include 10-11 foot wide separated right turn lanes, allowing the existing through-right lanes to be converted to through-only lanes. In doing so, the intersection capacity will increase, improving the LOS for the EB through-right lane to an acceptable manner. Concurrent with the Future (2032) With Project conditions, it is projected that the EB left-through-right lane at Manono Street and Piilani Street will operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.46). A MUTCD Peak Hour traffic signal warrant was analyzed at the intersection but did not pass. Additionally, the intersection was analyzed under AWSC, where the intersection met minimum MUTCD volume thresholds averaged over the AM and PM peak hours. It is therefore recommended to consider reconfiguring the intersection to AWSC, which will result in acceptable LOS for all intersection movements. Concurrent with the Future (2042) With Project conditions, it is project that the EB left-right lane at Hawaii Route 11 and Piilani Street will operate at LOSE during the AM peak hour (v/c ratio of 0.51). However, all mainline movements along Hawaii Route 11, which make up the majority of the intersection volume, will operate at appropriate LOS. The EB volume at the intersection is extremely low, particularly in in the EB left-turning direction, which will tend to have a higher delay than EB right- turning vehicles. The EB leftright lane is not approaching capacity. It is recommended to monitor the intersection, but no mitigation is deemed appropriate. - 54- SSFM International Concurrent with the Future (2042) With Project conditions, it is projected that the SB left-through-right lane at Manono Street and Piilani Street will operate at LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours (v/c ratio of 0.89 and 0.94, respectively), even after reconfiguring the AWSC, as recommended in the Future (2032) With Project conditions. A MUTCD Peak Hour traffic signal warrant was analyzed at the intersection but did not pass. Alternatively, the intersection was analyzed as a mini-roundabout, which shares many commonalities with standard roundabouts in terms of operational efficiency, intersection safety, and traffic calming, yet can be implemented at smaller intersections such as Manono Street and Piilani Street. Peak hour intersection volumes at the intersection are projected to be considerably below the FHWA recommended hourly capacity of a mini-roundabout. Alternatively, it is recommended to take traffic counts and monitor the intersection into the future for potential signal warrants passing. -55 - VI.REFERENCES SSFM International AECOM, Traffic Impact Analysis Report Hale Ola o Mohouli Affordable Residential Development (2020). C.H.M.H.I.L.L. (2012). Federal -Aid Functional Classification Update: Policy and Procedures. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Planning Branch. County of Hawaii. Hele-On Bus, < http://www.heleonbus.org/> County of Hawaii, Street Design Manual (October 2020). Federal Highway Administration. 2018 Highway Performance Monitoring System, https://www.arcgis.com/home/webma p/viewer .htm l?u rl=https%3A%2 F%2 Fgeo.dot.gov%2 Fserver %2Frest%2Fservices%2FHosted%2FHawaii_2018_PR%2FFeatureServer&source=sd Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2009 Edition). Federal Highway Administration. Mini-Roundabouts -Technical Summary (February 2010) Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 11th Edition: An /TE Informational Report, September 2021. Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC). EA and EIS Online Library, Accessed 2022, <http://oeqc.doh.Hawaii.gov/default.aspx>. SSFM International, Traffic Impact Analysis Report Bank of Hawaii (2018). SSFM International, Traffic Impact Analysis Report Hilo Iron Works (2019). State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii, July 2014. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Historical Traffic Station Maps. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Statewide Transportation Improvements Program, FY 2019-2022 <http://Hawaii.gov/dot/highways/ST! P>. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Highway Capacity Manual, Washington, D.C., 2010 Edition. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Highway Capacity Manual, Washington, D.C., 2016 Edition. Wilson Okamoto Corporation, Traffic Assessment South Hilo Sanitary Landfill (2017). - 56 - Appendix A -Traffic Count Data Traffic Data Service .. Traffic Station Sketch Island: Hawaii Area: Hilo Section ID/Station#: B71277000332 I. Piilani Street D2 ------------------------------- D1 I Meter# File Name bw89 D0718009_B71277000332 D0718010_B71277000332 Station Description: Manono Street: Piilani Street to Kuawa Street Survey Beginning Date/Time: 7/18/13@0000 Survey Method: Road Tube Survey Crew: LM Sketch Updated: Remarks: I FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC CLASS Manono Street 17 DI= Direction to End D2= Direction to Begin Manono Street ----------------------- Kuawa Street GPS 19.72071, -155.07 Survey Ending Date/Time: 7 /19/13 @ 2400 Data Type: Class CIB By: SR AREA ROUTE TYPE NO. I MILE 2770 I DI: Kuawa Street / Kamehameha A venue D2: Piilani Street / Haihai Street Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2013 Program Count -Summary 3AN :COLLECTOR Town: Hawaii Count Type: CLASS DIR 1: +MP DIR 2:-MP Counter Type: Tube Final AADT: 10300 Route No: 2770 eet -Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 16 06:00-06:15 33 33 66 12:00-12:15 109 114 223 06:00-06:15 32 62 94 15 06:15-06:30 42 43 85 12:15-12:30 108 114 222 06:15-06:30 45 76 121 20 06:30-06:45 30 36 66 12:30-12:45 94 115 209 06:30-06:45 55 63 118 13 06:45-07:00 57 67 124 12:45-01 :00 110 116 226 06:45-07:00 39 70 109 5 07:00-07:15 64 51 115 01 :00-01 :15 108 118 226 07:00-07:15 31 52 83 3 07:15-07:30 71 69 140 01 :15-01 :30 120 125 245 07:15-07:30 34 55 89 10 07:30-07:45 98 87 185 01 :30-01 :45 96 101 197 07:30-07:45 27 45 72 11 07:45-08:00 75 84 159 01 :45-02:00 84 111 195 07:45-08:00 38 33 71 14 08:00-08:15 75 79 154 02:00-02:15 85 100 185 08:00-08:15 36 38 74 4 08:15-08:30 83 77 160 02:15-02:30 82 109 191 08:15-08:30 30 28 58 5 08:30-08:45 76 81 157 02:30-02:45 107 113 220 08:30-08:45 31 42 73 8 08:45-09:00 80 75 155 02:45-03:00 99 137 236 08:45-09:00 23 20 43 5 09:00-09:15 76 81 157 03:00-03:15 97 126 223 09:00-09:15 16 20 36 3 09:15-09:30 88 80 168 03:15-03:30 81 117 198 09:15-09:30 20 16 36 9 09:30-09:45 87 89 176 03:30-03:45 83 124 207 09:30-09:45 22 29 51 10 09:45-10:00 83 98 181 03:45-04:00 82 132 214 09:45-10:00 21 21 42 7 10:00-10:15 87 79 166 04:00-04:15 117 134 251 10:00-10:15 23 19 42 9 10:15-10:30 85 83 168 04:15-04:30 96 108 204 10:15-10:30 9 14 23 11 10:30-10:45 80 98 178 04:30-04:45 99 138 237 10:30-10:45 13 11 24 23 10:45-11 :00 83 123 206 04:45-05:00 112 117 229 10:45-11 :00 6 9 15 26 11:00-11:15 109 103 212 05:00-05:15 84 87 171 11:00-11:15 6 6 12 25 11:15-11:30 81 118 199 05:15-05:30 61 92 153 11:15-11:30 7 11 18 33 11:30-11:45 92 126 218 05:30-05:45 53 108 161 11:30-11:45 9 2 11 42 11:45-12:00 87 107 194 05:45-06:00 69 61 130 11 :45-12:00 7 9 16 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR1 DIR2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 331 327 658 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 424 497 921 6.33 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.86 50.30 49.70 100.00 PM-0(%) 46.04 53.96 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 331 327 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 424 512 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 365 470 835 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 424 497 921 8.03 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.86 43.71 56.29 100.00 PM-0(%) 46.04 53.96 100.00 1:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,822 1,967 3,789 12:30 PM to 01 :30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 2,002 2,114 4,116 432 474 906 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,236 2,717 4,953 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,816 3,468 6,284 12:45 PM to 01 :45 PM 12:30 PM to 01 :30 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 4,818 5,582 10,400 434 474 0(%) 46.33 53.67 100.00 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2013 Program Count -Summary 3AN :COLLECTOR Town: Hawaii Count Type: CLASS DIR 1: +MP DIR 2:-MP Counter Type: Tube Final AADT: 10300 Route No: 2770 eet -Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 17 06:00-06:15 22 27 49 12:00-12:15 89 114 203 06:00-06:15 55 68 123 8 06:15-06:30 32 34 66 12:15-12:30 96 111 207 06:15-06:30 78 70 148 12 06:30-06:45 33 42 75 12:30-12:45 122 107 229 06:30-06:45 47 69 116 8 06:45-07:00 47 40 87 12:45-01 :00 93 115 208 06:45-07:00 61 59 120 16 07:00-07:15 47 56 103 01 :00-01 :15 104 116 220 07:00-07:15 56 64 120 5 07:15-07:30 56 58 114 01 :15-01 :30 96 114 210 07:15-07:30 40 71 111 7 07:30-07:45 81 88 169 01 :30-01 :45 92 113 205 07:30-07:45 56 73 129 8 07:45-08:00 83 74 157 01 :45-02:00 88 99 187 07:45-08:00 40 49 89 5 08:00-08:15 62 77 139 02:00-02:15 89 111 200 08:00-08:15 39 40 79 2 08:15-08:30 56 100 156 02:15-02:30 98 103 201 08:15-08:30 40 45 85 6 08:30-08:45 85 69 154 02:30-02:45 84 109 193 08:30-08:45 25 35 60 4 08:45-09:00 86 99 185 02:45-03:00 110 105 215 08:45-09:00 33 43 76 5 09:00-09:15 87 90 177 03:00-03:15 89 130 219 09:00-09:15 33 32 65 4 09:15-09:30 88 89 177 03:15-03:30 74 108 182 09:15-09:30 50 36 86 9 09:30-09:45 72 120 192 03:30-03:45 111 117 228 09:30-09:45 33 40 73 8 09:45-10:00 84 113 197 03:45-04:00 96 121 217 09:45-10:00 42 30 72 10 10:00-10:15 71 95 166 04:00-04:15 119 121 240 10:00-10:15 33 41 74 16 10:15-10:30 75 91 166 04:15-04:30 98 144 242 10:15-10:30 27 32 59 16 10:30-10:45 73 109 182 04:30-04:45 106 118 224 10:30-10:45 29 23 52 14 10:45-11 :00 92 111 203 04:45-05:00 103 136 239 10:45-11 :00 40 28 68 16 11:00-11:15 103 104 207 05:00-05:15 107 109 216 11:00-11:15 17 27 44 24 11:15-11:30 112 120 232 05:15-05:30 68 80 148 11:15-11:30 14 23 37 36 11:30-11:45 106 133 239 05:30-05:45 82 99 181 11:30-11:45 19 26 45 53 11:45-12:00 110 95 205 05:45-06:00 67 99 166 11 :45-12:00 14 15 29 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR1 DIR2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 289 345 634 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 426 519 945 5.74 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.56 45.58 54.42 100.00 PM-0(%) 45.08 54.92 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 289 345 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 426 519 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 11 :00 AM to 12:00 PM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 431 452 883 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 426 519 945 7.99 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.56 48.81 51.19 100.00 PM-0(%) 45.08 54.92 100.00 1:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,763 2,034 3,797 11 :00 AM to 12:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,926 2,180 4,106 431 452 883 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,281 2,699 4,980 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 3,202 3,738 6,940 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM 24 HOUR PERIOD 5,128 5,918 11,046 431 468 0(%) 46.42 53.58 100.00 Run Date: 2014/05/28 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2013 Site ID: B71277000332 Town: Hawaii Route No: 2770 Direction: +MP Date From: 2013/07/18 0:00 Location: Manono Street -Piilani Street to Kuawa St Date To: 2013/07/19 23:45 Functional Classification: 17 URBAN:COLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS -48 HOURS RECORDED Cycles PC 2A-4T LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS Bus SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 3A-SU 4A-SU SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS AXLE CORRECTION FACTOR (A/C) = 0_997 PEAK HOUR PEAK VOLUME : 945 HOUR 2013/07/19 16:00 TRUCK VOLUME SINGLE UNIT TRUCKS (TYPE 4-7) 1 COMBINATION (TYPE 8-13) 2 VOLUME 122 15394 5746 21262 % 0.57% 71.78% 26.79% 99.14% HEAVY VEHICLES 74 57 16 3 21 10 0 0 0 2 183 21445(A) 0.35% 0.27% 0.07% 0.01% 0.10% 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.85% 100.00% 0.00% NUMBER OF AXLES 244 30788 11492 42525 185 114 48 12 84 50 0 0 0 14 507 43032 (B) ROADTUBE EQUIVALENT(B/2) = 21516 (C) %TOTAL HPMS PEAK 24 HOUR K-FACTOR HOUR TRUCK %OF (PEAK/AADT) VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) (65A-1) (65A-2) 0.11% 75 0.73% 9.17% (65B-1) 10300 (65B-2) 0.21% 16 0.16% 9.17% Traffic Data Service .. Traffic Station Sketch Island: Hawaii Area: Hilo Section ID/Station#: B71277000332 I. Piilani Street D2 ------------------------------- D1 I Meter# File Name bt31 D0310013_B71277000332 D0310014_B71277000332 Station Description: Manono Street: Piilani Street to Kuawa Street Survey Beginning Date/Time: 3/10/14@0000 Survey Method: Road Tube Survey Crew: LM Sketch Updated: Remarks: I FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC CLASS Manono Street 17 DI= Direction to End D2= Direction to Begin Manono Street ----------------------- Kuawa Street GPS 19.72071, -155.07 Survey Ending Date/Time: 3/11/14@2400 Data Type: Class CIB By: SR AREA ROUTE TYPE NO. I MILE 2770 I DI: Kuawa Street / Kamehameha A venue D2: Piilani Street / Haihai Street 0 3AN :COLLECTOR Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count -Summary Town: Hawaii Count Type: CLASS DIR 1: +MP DIR 2:-MP Counter Type: Tube Final AADT: 9900 Route No: 2770 eet -Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 8 06:00-06:15 14 17 31 12:00-12:15 90 114 204 06:00-06:15 53 67 120 8 06:15-06:30 28 38 66 12:15-12:30 98 97 195 06:15-06:30 52 87 139 6 06:30-06:45 47 59 106 12:30-12:45 72 92 164 06:30-06:45 38 59 97 5 06:45-07:00 43 52 95 12:45-01 :00 95 96 191 06:45-07:00 56 38 94 7 07:00-07:15 46 51 97 01 :00-01 :15 84 87 171 07:00-07:15 39 59 98 7 07:15-07:30 65 74 139 01 :15-01 :30 83 90 173 07:15-07:30 40 37 77 11 07:30-07:45 66 91 157 01 :30-01 :45 87 75 162 07:30-07:45 33 32 65 7 07:45-08:00 80 107 187 01 :45-02:00 78 85 163 07:45-08:00 33 29 62 4 08:00-08:15 78 73 151 02:00-02:15 79 112 191 08:00-08:15 25 29 54 3 08:15-08:30 58 92 150 02:15-02:30 84 111 195 08:15-08:30 23 33 56 4 08:30-08:45 70 79 149 02:30-02:45 89 109 198 08:30-08:45 14 16 30 3 08:45-09:00 77 100 177 02:45-03:00 82 123 205 08:45-09:00 32 16 48 6 09:00-09:15 72 79 151 03:00-03:15 98 105 203 09:00-09:15 23 24 47 7 09:15-09:30 67 81 148 03:15-03:30 95 84 179 09:15-09:30 14 19 33 10 09:30-09:45 72 83 155 03:30-03:45 98 96 194 09:30-09:45 12 18 30 13 09:45-10:00 81 75 156 03:45-04:00 98 115 213 09:45-10:00 16 19 35 11 10:00-10:15 69 105 174 04:00-04:15 129 131 260 10:00-10:15 15 20 35 10 10:15-10:30 85 97 182 04:15-04:30 91 102 193 10:15-10:30 12 13 25 15 10:30-10:45 83 82 165 04:30-04:45 89 126 215 10:30-10:45 10 19 29 19 10:45-11 :00 100 88 188 04:45-05:00 115 133 248 10:45-11 :00 11 8 19 27 11:00-11:15 79 88 167 05:00-05:15 95 83 178 11:00-11:15 5 13 18 30 11:15-11:30 86 112 198 05:15-05:30 107 91 198 11:15-11:30 7 9 16 29 11:30-11:45 83 117 200 05:30-05:45 74 89 163 11:30-11:45 8 12 20 41 11:45-12:00 89 125 214 05:45-06:00 56 98 154 11 :45-12:00 3 8 11 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM CO MMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR1 DIR2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 282 363 645 PM -PEAK HR VO LUME 424 492 916 6.61 PM - K FACTOR (%) 9.38 43.72 56.28 100.00 PM-0(%) 46.29 53.71 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:15AM to 08:15AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 289 363 PM -PEAK HR VO LUME 424 492 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 11 :00 AM to 12:00 PM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 337 442 779 PM -PEAK HR VO LUME 424 492 916 7.98 PM - K FACTOR (%) 9.38 43.26 56.74 100.00 PM-0(%) 46.29 53.71 100.00 1:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,638 1,965 3,603 11:15AM to 12:15 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,794 2,100 3,894 348 468 816 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,166 2,444 4,610 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,740 3,128 5,868 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM 11:15AMto 12:15 PM 24 HO UR PERIOD 4,534 5,228 9,762 360 468 0(%) 46.45 53.55 100.00 0 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count -Summary Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP FinalAADT: 99003AN :COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 2770 eet - Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 11 06:00-06:15 19 20 39 12:00-12:15 97 98 195 06:00-06:15 72 84 156 14 06:15-06:30 46 54 100 12:15-12:30 84 117 201 06:15-06:30 67 95 162 15 06:30-06:45 50 50 100 12:30-12:45 104 104 208 06:30-06:45 53 93 146 11 06:45-07:00 50 52 102 12:45-01 :00 96 108 204 06:45-07:00 48 80 128 7 07:00-07:15 58 61 119 01 :00-01 :15 96 104 200 07:00-07:15 55 65 120 5 07:15-07:30 66 89 155 01 :15-01 :30 81 129 210 07:15-07:30 37 69 106 15 07:30-07:45 84 86 170 01 :30-01 :45 97 129 226 07:30-07:45 26 42 68 7 07:45-08:00 81 117 198 01 :45-02:00 76 115 191 07:45-08:00 18 24 42 7 08:00-08:15 72 104 176 02:00-02:15 107 119 226 08:00-08:15 36 36 72 5 08:15-08:30 87 91 178 02:15-02:30 102 117 219 08:15-08:30 28 22 50 8 08:30-08:45 86 91 177 02:30-02:45 95 120 215 08:30-08:45 37 38 75 8 08:45-09:00 74 100 174 02:45-03:00 95 131 226 08:45-09:00 36 16 52 3 09:00-09:15 75 83 158 03:00-03:15 105 130 235 09:00-09:15 29 30 59 4 09:15-09:30 90 98 188 03:15-03:30 103 118 221 09:15-09:30 24 29 53 10 09:30-09:45 82 106 188 03:30-03:45 102 126 228 09:30-09:45 28 28 56 14 09:45-10:00 69 74 143 03:45-04:00 97 138 235 09:45-10:00 18 19 37 13 10:00-10:15 76 93 169 04:00-04:15 143 134 277 10:00-10:15 10 23 33 9 10:15-10:30 74 101 175 04:15-04:30 125 124 249 10:15-10:30 15 13 28 15 10:30-10:45 72 89 161 04:30-04:45 103 151 254 10:30-10:45 19 14 33 20 10:45-11 :00 88 100 188 04:45-05:00 106 118 224 10:45-11 :00 7 8 15 12 11:00-11:15 89 92 181 05:00-05:15 118 119 237 11:00-11:15 8 12 20 24 11:15-11:30 91 111 202 05:15-05:30 104 146 250 11:15-11:30 9 9 18 28 11:30-11:45 85 111 196 05:30-05:45 86 94 180 11:30-11:45 7 16 23 50 11:45-12:00 107 89 196 05:45-06:00 74 81 155 11 :45-12:00 6 5 11 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR1 DIR2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 326 403 729 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 468 547 1015 6.64 PM - K FACTOR (%) 9.25 44.72 55.28 100.00 PM-0(%) 46.11 53.89 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 326 403 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 477 547 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 11 :00 AM to 12:00 PM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 372 403 775 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 468 547 1015 7.06 PM - K FACTOR (%) 9.25 48.00 52.00 100.00 PM-0(%) 46.11 53.89 100.00 1:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,771 2,062 3,833 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,936 2,212 4,148 399 487 886 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,396 2,870 5,266 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 3,089 3,740 6,829 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 01 :15 PM to 02:15 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 5,025 5,952 10,977 399 492 0(%) 45.78 54.22 100.00 Run Date: 2015/04/14 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2014 Site ID: B71277000332 Town: Hawaii Route No: 2770 Direction: +MP Date From: 2014/03/10 0:00 Location: Manono Street -Piilani Street to Kuawa St Date To: 2014/03/11 23:45 Functional Classification: 17 URBAN:COLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS -48 HOURS RECORDED Cycles PC 2A-4T LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS Bus SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 3A-SU 4A-SU SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS AXLE CORRECTION FACTOR (A/C) = 0_995 PEAK HOUR PEAK VOLUME : 1004 HOUR 2014/03/11 16:00 TRUCK VOLUME SINGLE UNIT TRUCKS (TYPE 4-7) 8 COMBINATION (TYPE 8-13) 0 VOLUME 158 14991 5340 20489 % 0.76% 72.28% 25.75% 98.79% HEAVY VEHICLES 113 59 34 3 24 13 3 0 0 250 20739(A) 0 0.54% 0.28% 0.16% 0.01% 0.12% 0.06% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.21% 100.00% 0.00% NUMBER OF AXLES 315 29982 10680 40977 283 118 102 12 96 65 18 5 0 0 699 41676 (B) ROADTUBE EQUIVALENT(B/2) = 20838 (C) %TOTAL HPMS PEAK 24 HOUR K-FACTOR HOUR TRUCK %OF (PEAK/AADT) VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) (65A-1) (65A-2) 0.80% 104 1.05% 10.14% (65B-1) 9900 (65B-2) 0.00% 20 0.20% 10.14% Traffic Data Service .. Traffic Station Sketch Island: Hawaii Area: Hilo Section ID/Station#: B71277000332 Piilani Street D2 Manono Street ------------------------------�----------------------- D1 I Kuawa Street Meter# File Name GPS I. bt31 D0806019_B71277000332 19.72071, -155.07 D0806020_B71277000332 Station Description: Manono Street: Piilani Street to Kuawa Street Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 8/6/15@0000 8/7/15@2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM CIB Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: I FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. I MILE Manono Street 17 2770 I DI= Direction to End DI: Kuawa Street / Kamehameha A venue D2= Direction to Begin D2: Piilani Street / Haihai Street 9 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count -Summary Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP FinalAADT: 8200 �AN :COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 2770 eet - Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 13 06:00-06:15 29 17 46 12:00-12:15 90 71 161 06:00-06:15 45 70 115 15 06:15-06:30 43 50 93 12:15-12:30 90 72 162 06:15-06:30 64 70 134 25 06:30-06:45 41 49 90 12:30-12:45 64 86 150 06:30-06:45 61 67 128 11 06:45-07:00 58 56 114 12:45-01 :00 70 79 149 06:45-07:00 55 61 116 17 07:00-07:15 51 42 93 01 :00-01 :15 60 68 128 07:00-07:15 40 51 91 13 07:15-07:30 65 61 126 01 :15-01 :30 73 73 146 07:15-07:30 36 63 99 17 07:30-07:45 76 75 151 01 :30-01 :45 65 78 143 07:30-07:45 38 42 80 8 07:45-08:00 55 88 143 01 :45-02:00 58 85 143 07:45-08:00 35 23 58 8 08:00-08:15 68 82 150 02:00-02:15 80 80 160 08:00-08:15 29 39 68 9 08:15-08:30 53 63 116 02:15-02:30 64 75 139 08:15-08:30 36 22 58 6 08:30-08:45 66 51 117 02:30-02:45 55 80 135 08:30-08:45 42 27 69 5 08:45-09:00 58 66 124 02:45-03:00 63 82 145 08:45-09:00 34 26 60 12 09:00-09:15 56 36 92 03:00-03:15 87 62 149 09:00-09:15 36 24 60 15 09:15-09:30 59 64 123 03:15-03:30 79 71 150 09:15-09:30 17 19 36 13 09:30-09:45 54 63 117 03:30-03:45 64 75 139 09:30-09:45 46 19 65 4 09:45-10:00 60 77 137 03:45-04:00 79 74 153 09:45-10:00 28 19 47 15 10:00-10:15 71 48 119 04:00-04:15 93 85 178 10:00-10:15 24 19 43 17 10:15-10:30 47 65 112 04:15-04:30 86 79 165 10:15-10:30 21 19 40 20 10:30-10:45 73 60 133 04:30-04:45 102 86 188 10:30-10:45 17 17 34 19 10:45-11 :00 80 88 168 04:45-05:00 91 86 177 10:45-11 :00 17 6 23 28 11:00-11:15 60 71 131 05:00-05:15 75 68 143 11:00-11:15 13 14 27 26 11:15-11:30 65 70 135 05:15-05:30 61 68 129 11:15-11:30 15 12 27 38 11:30-11:45 49 81 130 05:30-05:45 48 89 137 11:30-11:45 16 11 27 54 11:45-12:00 90 67 157 05:45-06:00 60 86 146 11:45-12:00 12 7 19 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 264 306 570 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 372 336 708 6.73 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.36 46.32 53.68 100.00 PM-D(o/o) 52.54 47.46 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 264 308 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 372 336 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 264 306 570 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 372 336 708 6.73 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.36 46.32 53.68 100.00 PM-0(%) 52.54 47.46 100.00 I:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,427 1,490 2,917 11 :45 AM to 12:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,669 1,656 3,325 334 296 630 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 1,757 1,858 3,615 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,534 2,605 5,139 11 :45 AM to 12:45 PM 01 :45 PM to 02:45 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 4,203 4,261 8,464 334 320 0(%) 49.66 50.34 100.00 9 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count -Summary Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP FinalAADT: 8200 �AN :COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 2770 eet - Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 13 06:00-06:15 24 20 44 12:00-12:15 76 89 165 06:00-06:15 86 65 151 14 06:15-06:30 47 51 98 12:15-12:30 85 82 167 06:15-06:30 81 66 147 14 06:30-06:45 39 39 78 12:30-12:45 76 96 172 06:30-06:45 66 74 140 19 06:45-07:00 58 42 100 12:45-01 :00 96 81 177 06:45-07:00 62 55 117 8 07:00-07:15 56 43 99 01 :00-01 :15 63 100 163 07:00-07:15 48 58 106 7 07:15-07:30 70 56 126 01 :15-01 :30 83 76 159 07:15-07:30 47 42 89 10 07:30-07:45 68 54 122 01 :30-01 :45 83 79 162 07:30-07:45 45 40 85 7 07:45-08:00 69 70 139 01 :45-02:00 90 65 155 07:45-08:00 37 59 96 10 08:00-08:15 55 80 135 02:00-02:15 79 83 162 08:00-08:15 47 38 85 4 08:15-08:30 71 66 137 02:15-02:30 78 77 155 08:15-08:30 42 27 69 4 08:30-08:45 66 52 118 02:30-02:45 82 92 174 08:30-08:45 30 37 67 3 08:45-09:00 68 70 138 02:45-03:00 90 90 180 08:45-09:00 34 34 68 9 09:00-09:15 74 56 130 03:00-03:15 90 87 177 09:00-09:15 23 56 79 15 09:15-09:30 74 74 148 03:15-03:30 106 70 176 09:15-09:30 46 24 70 12 09:30-09:45 49 62 111 03:30-03:45 83 80 163 09:30-09:45 34 40 74 24 09:45-10:00 74 67 141 03:45-04:00 96 107 203 09:45-10:00 36 32 68 15 10:00-10:15 62 74 136 04:00-04:15 106 82 188 10:00-10:15 32 24 56 12 10:15-10:30 94 77 171 04:15-04:30 120 81 201 10:15-10:30 21 37 58 15 10:30-10:45 86 86 172 04:30-04:45 86 82 168 10:30-10:45 19 23 42 20 10:45-11 :00 71 75 146 04:45-05:00 90 78 168 10:45-11 :00 23 32 55 17 11:00-11:15 84 63 147 05:00-05:15 71 70 141 11:00-11:15 24 20 44 17 11:15-11:30 93 73 166 05:15-05:30 56 71 127 11:15-11:30 14 17 31 24 11:30-11:45 81 80 161 05:30-05:45 79 71 150 11:30-11:45 18 30 48 47 11:45-12:00 99 67 166 05:45-06:00 80 67 147 11:45-12:00 17 14 31 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 263 270 533 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 408 352 760 5.70 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.13 49.34 50.66 100.00 PM-D(o/o) 53.68 46.32 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 263 270 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 408 352 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 11 :00 AM to 12:00 PM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 357 283 640 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 408 352 760 6.85 PM - K FACTOR (%) 8.13 55.78 44.22 100.00 PM-0(%) 53.68 46.32 100.00 I:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,632 1,497 3,129 12:00 PM to 01 :00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,803 1,666 3,469 333 348 681 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,044 1,956 4,000 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,976 2,900 5,876 11 :00 AM to 12:00 PM 12:15 PM to 01:15 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 4,779 4,566 9,345 357 359 0(%) 51.14 48.86 100.00 Run Date: 2016/05/19 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 Site ID: B71277000332 Town: Hawaii Route No: 2770 Direction: +MP Date From: 2015/08/06 0:00 Location: Manono Street -Piilani Street to Kuawa St Date To: 2015/08/07 23:45 Functional Classification: 17 URBAN:COLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS -48 HOURS RECORDED Cycles PC 2A-4T LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS Bus SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 3A-SU 4A-SU SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS AXLE CORRECTION FACTOR (A/C) = 0_991 PEAK HOUR VOLUME : 725 PEAK HOUR TRUCK 2015/08/07 16:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT TRUCKS (TYPE 4-7) 9 COMBINATION (TYPE 8-13) 5 VOLUME 37 12913 4574 17524 % 0.21% 72.51% 25.68% 98.40% HEAVY VEHICLES 86 79 48 13 22 8 2 2 17 8 285 17809(A) -0 0.48% 0.44% 0.27% 0.07% 0.12% 0.04% 0.01% 0.01% 0.10% 0.04% 1.60% 100.00% -0.00% NUMBER OF AXLES 75 25826 9148 35049 215 158 144 52 88 40 12 10 102 56 877 35926 (B) ROADTUBE EQUIVALENT(B/2) = 17963 (C) %TOTAL HPMS PEAK 24 HOUR K-FACTOR HOUR TRUCK %OF (PEAK/AADT) VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) (65A-1) (65A-2) 1.24% 113 1.38% 8.84% (65B-1) 8200 (65B-2) 0.69% 29 0.35% 8.84% Traffic Data Service � Traffic Station Sketch Island: Hawaii Area: Hilo Section ID/Station#: B71277000332 Piilani Street D2 Manono Street ------------------------------------------------------ D1 I Kuawa Street Meter# File Name GPS I.bt31 D0413025_B71277000332 19.72071, -155.07 D0413026_B71277000332 Station Description: Manono Street: Piilani Street to Kuawa Street Survey Beginning Dateffime: Survey Ending Dateffime: 4/13/16 @ 0000 4/14/16 @ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Vol Survey Crew: LM Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: I FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. I MILE Manono Street 17 2770 IDI= Direction to End DI: Kuawa Street / Kamehameha Avenue D2= Direction to Begin D2: Piilani Street / Haihai Street 4 �AN :COLLECTOR Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count -Summary Town: Hawaii DIR 1: +MP DIR 2:-MP Count Type: VOLUME Counter Type: Tube Final AADT: 7600 Route No: 2770 eet -Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 12 06:00-06:15 25 22 47 12:00-12:15 64 67 131 06:00-06:15 66 42 108 17 06:15-06:30 41 21 62 12:15-12:30 64 69 133 06:15-06:30 58 41 99 11 06:30-06:45 56 24 80 12:30-12:45 58 65 123 06:30-06:45 35 51 86 6 06:45-07:00 51 34 85 12:45-01 :00 64 59 123 06:45-07:00 59 53 112 6 07:00-07:15 48 32 80 01 :00-01 :15 56 62 118 07:00-07:15 39 24 63 8 07:15-07:30 52 46 98 01 :15-01 :30 52 73 125 07:15-07:30 52 33 85 8 07:30-07:45 67 48 115 01 :30-01 :45 61 82 143 07:30-07:45 34 21 55 6 07:45-08:00 48 69 117 01 :45-02:00 58 90 148 07:45-08:00 28 14 42 4 08:00-08:15 62 45 107 02:00-02:15 84 76 160 08:00-08:15 25 12 37 2 08:15-08:30 69 54 123 02:15-02:30 71 81 152 08:15-08:30 32 13 45 3 08:30-08:45 57 40 97 02:30-02:45 74 77 151 08:30-08:45 26 7 33 3 08:45-09:00 60 48 108 02:45-03:00 59 60 119 08:45-09:00 24 9 33 2 09:00-09:15 58 40 98 03:00-03:15 88 83 171 09:00-09:15 20 13 33 3 09:15-09:30 59 46 105 03:15-03:30 75 77 152 09:15-09:30 15 10 25 4 09:30-09:45 46 67 113 03:30-03:45 78 63 141 09:30-09:45 15 11 26 7 09:45-10:00 50 62 112 03:45-04:00 79 61 140 09:45-10:00 13 6 19 3 10:00-10:15 58 62 120 04:00-04:15 86 59 145 10:00-10:15 8 9 17 12 10:15-10:30 52 75 127 04:15-04:30 98 83 181 10:15-10:30 13 13 26 9 10:30-10:45 76 73 149 04:30-04:45 85 90 175 10:30-10:45 8 3 11 17 10:45-11 :00 64 86 150 04:45-05:00 93 78 171 10:45-11 :00 14 9 23 10 11:00-11:15 62 67 129 05:00-05:15 77 56 133 11:00-11:15 10 3 13 14 11:15-11:30 67 97 164 05:15-05:30 69 61 130 11:15-11:30 6 3 9 24 11:30-11:45 64 71 135 05:30-05:45 68 45 113 11:30-11:45 8 1 9 37 11:45-12:00 73 67 140 05:45-06:00 46 43 89 11:45-12:00 5 5 10 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 246 216 462 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 362 310 672 6.35 PM - K FACTOR (%) 9.24 53.25 46.75 100.00 PM-D(o/o) 53.87 46.13 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 248 216 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 362 310 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 10:30 AM to 11 :30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 269 323 592 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 362 310 672 8.14 PM - K FACTOR (%) 9.24 45.44 54.56 100.00 PM-0(%) 53.87 46.13 100.00 I:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,365 1,296 2,661 01 :45 PM to 02:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,517 1,372 2,889 287 324 611 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 1,707 1,660 3,367 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,320 2,066 4,386 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 01 :30 PM to 02:30 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 3,837 3,438 7,275 288 329 0(%) 52.74 47.26 100.00 4 �AN :COLLECTOR Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count -Summary Town: Hawaii DIR 1: +MP DIR 2:-MP Count Type: VOLUME Counter Type: Tube Final AADT: 7600 Route No: 2770 eet -Piilani Street to Kuawa St 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 3 06:00-06:15 28 11 39 12:00-12:15 85 92 177 06:00-06:15 67 73 140 4 06:15-06:30 49 24 73 12:15-12:30 72 93 165 06:15-06:30 65 77 142 10 06:30-06:45 52 28 80 12:30-12:45 92 78 170 06:30-06:45 54 65 119 3 06:45-07:00 47 28 75 12:45-01 :00 68 103 171 06:45-07:00 43 75 118 8 07:00-07:15 58 22 80 01 :00-01 :15 79 83 162 07:00-07:15 33 75 108 4 07:15-07:30 49 40 89 01 :15-01 :30 80 89 169 07:15-07:30 36 56 92 10 07:30-07:45 69 53 122 01 :30-01 :45 84 75 159 07:30-07:45 27 37 64 4 07:45-08:00 57 69 126 01 :45-02:00 70 86 156 07:45-08:00 37 28 65 4 08:00-08:15 68 69 137 02:00-02:15 83 72 155 08:00-08:15 33 17 50 2 08:15-08:30 68 39 107 02:15-02:30 76 87 163 08:15-08:30 26 24 50 6 08:30-08:45 71 43 114 02:30-02:45 99 100 199 08:30-08:45 21 16 37 3 08:45-09:00 69 44 113 02:45-03:00 99 97 196 08:45-09:00 38 15 53 5 09:00-09:15 63 51 114 03:00-03:15 84 125 209 09:00-09:15 23 20 43 1 09:15-09:30 66 54 120 03:15-03:30 101 103 204 09:15-09:30 16 15 31 4 09:30-09:45 67 64 131 03:30-03:45 88 102 190 09:30-09:45 19 17 36 5 09:45-10:00 65 82 147 03:45-04:00 85 97 182 09:45-10:00 14 20 34 12 10:00-10:15 50 65 115 04:00-04:15 119 100 219 10:00-10:15 13 6 19 9 10:15-10:30 51 64 115 04:15-04:30 102 101 203 10:15-10:30 20 7 27 12 10:30-10:45 62 82 144 04:30-04:45 106 149 255 10:30-10:45 7 12 19 13 10:45-11 :00 73 87 160 04:45-05:00 96 138 234 10:45-11 :00 15 7 22 14 11:00-11:15 72 76 148 05:00-05:15 78 99 177 11:00-11:15 7 6 13 24 11:15-11:30 79 78 157 05:15-05:30 108 72 180 11:15-11:30 14 6 20 13 11:30-11:45 77 78 155 05:30-05:45 79 105 184 11:30-11:45 13 6 19 23 11:45-12:00 78 73 151 05:45-06:00 89 74 163 11:45-12:00 9 7 16 10-09:00) DIR1 DIR2 PM CO MMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 262 230 492 PM -PEAK HR VO LUME 423 488 911 5.60 PM - K FACTOR (%) 10.37 53.25 46.75 100.00 PM-D(o/o) 46.43 53.57 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM 07:15 AM to 08:15AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 276 231 PM -PEAK HR VO LUME 423 488 PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 10:45AM to 11:45AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 301 319 620 PM -PEAK HR VO LUME 423 488 911 7.06 PM - K FACTOR (%) 10.37 48.55 51.45 100.00 PM-0(%) 46.43 53.57 100.00 I:00-15:00) 6-HR, 12-HR, 24-HR PERIODS DIR1 DIR2 Total AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,488 1,324 2,812 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,622 1,386 3,008 357 356 713 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,122 2,320 4,442 PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,772 3,007 5,779 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 12:00 PM to 01 :00 PM 24 HO UR PERIOD 4,394 4,393 8,787 357 366 0(%) 50.01 49.99 100.00 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) Run Date: 24-M AR-2 2 State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71277000332 Town: DIR 1: +MP DIR2: -MP Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Location: DATE: 18-SEP-19 AM COMMUTER PERIOD (05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 07:30 to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:15 to 05:15 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 351 468 819 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 478 AM -K FACTOR(%) 7.52 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 42.86 57.14 100 PM-D(%) 47.51 5, DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 07:45 to 08:45 AM 07:30 to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 360 468 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 497 5, AM PERIOD (00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 07:30 to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 04:15 to 05:15 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 351 468 819 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 478 5, AM -K FACTOR(%) 7.52 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 42.86 57.14 100 PM-D(%) 47.51 5, NON COMMUTER PERIOD (09:00-15:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 6-HR. 12-HR. 24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,857 2, PEAK HR TIME 02:30 to 03:30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 2,040 2, PEAK HR VOLUME 398 435 833 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,406 2, DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 3,046 3, PEAK HR TIME 02:30 to 03:30 PM 01 :00 to 02:00 PM 24-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 5,086 5, PEAK HR VOLUME 398 443 D% 46.69 5: TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIM 12:00-12:15 5 5 10 06:00 -06:15 29 40 69 12:00-12:15 104 107 211 06:0C 12:15-12:30 7 5 12 06:15 -06:30 64 59 123 12:15 -12:30 96 100 196 06:15 12:30 -12:45 6 10 16 06:30 -06:45 60 59 119 12:30 -12:45 81 113 194 06:3( 12:45 -01 :00 2 4 6 06:45-07:00 55 70 125 12:45 -01 :00 97 86 183 06:45 01:00-01:15 2 4 6 07:00 -07:15 79 77 156 01:00-01:15 93 98 191 07:0C 01:15-01:30 9 10 07:15 -07:30 69 87 156 01:15-01:30 87 117 204 07:15 01 :30 -01 :45 5 7 12 07:30 -07:45 91 126 217 01:30-01:45 97 121 218 07:3( 01 :45 -02:00 2 3 07:45 -08:00 79 122 201 01 :45 -02:00 93 107 200 07:45 02:00 -02:15 4 6 10 08:00 -08:15 86 106 192 02:00 -02:15 107 92 199 08:0C 02:15 -02:30 3 1 4 08:15 -08:30 95 114 209 02:15 -02:30 81 99 180 08:15 02:30 -02:45 0 9 9 08:30 -08:45 100 79 179 02:30 -02:45 101 110 211 08:3( 02:45 -03:00 4 6 10 08:45-09:00 74 72 146 02:45 -03:00 102 115 217 08:45 03:00 -03:15 4 6 10 09:00 -09:15 74 80 154 03:00 -03:15 94 102 196 09:0C 03:15 -03:30 7 6 13 09:15 -09:30 68 90 158 03:15 -03:30 101 108 209 09:15 03:30 -03:45 6 3 9 09:30 -09:45 78 86 164 03:30 -03:45 91 85 176 09:3( 03:45 -04:00 10 7 17 09:45-10:00 83 102 185 03:45 -04:00 124 115 239 09:45 04:00 -04:15 11 6 17 10:00-10:15 83 95 178 04:00 -04:15 120 102 222 10:0C 04:15 -04:30 4 9 13 10:15 -10:30 73 82 155 04:15 -04:30 124 116 240 10:15 04:30-04:45 10 11 21 10:30 -10:45 72 94 166 04:30 -04:45 129 144 273 10:3( 04:45 -05:00 15 13 28 10:45-11:00 98 90 188 04:45 -05:00 104 148 252 10:45 05:00 -05:15 18 11 29 11:00-11:15 94 123 217 05:00 -05:15 121 120 241 11:0C 05:15 -05:30 16 12 28 11:15-11:30 96 99 195 05:15 -05:30 102 111 213 11:15 05:30 -05:45 17 13 30 11:30-11:45 85 116 201 05:30 -05:45 83 149 232 11:3( 05:45 -06:00 24 23 47 11:45-12:00 72 104 176 05:45 -06:00 74 93 167 11:45 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) release 48 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) Run Date: 24-M AR-2 2 State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71277000332 Town: DIR 1: +MP DIR2: -MP Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Location: DATE: 19-SEP-19 AM COMMUTER PERIOD (05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 07:15 to 08:15 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 318 467 785 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 437 AM -K FACTOR(%) 8.05 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 40.51 59.49 100 PM-D(%) 45.71 5' DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 08:30 to 09:30 AM 07:15 to 08:15 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:15 to 04:15 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 320 467 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 462 AM PERIOD (00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 11:45 to 12:45 PM PM -PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 381 445 826 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 414 SE AM -K FACTOR(%) 8.48 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 40.51 59.49 100 PM-D(%) 45.71 5' NON COMMUTER PERIOD (09:00-15:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 6-HR. 12-HR. 24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,770 2, PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,972 2, PEAK HR VOLUME 414 563 977 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,368 1, DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 3,480 1, PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM 02:45 to 03:45 PM 24-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 5,452 4, PEAK HR VOLUME 414 563 D% 55.94 TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIM 12:00-12:15 6 9 15 06:00 -06:15 33 31 64 12:00-12:15 91 104 195 06:0C 12:15-12:30 2 3 06:15 -06:30 57 121 12:15 -12:30 88 105 193 06:15 12:30 -12:45 3 4 06:30 -06:45 60 52 112 12:30 -12:45 116 113 229 06:3( 12:45 -01 :00 4 3 7 06:45-07:00 54 60 114 12:45 -01 :00 89 96 185 06:45 01:00-01:15 6 6 12 07:00 -07:15 66 85 151 01:00-01:15 101 95 196 07:0C 01:15-01:30 4 4 8 07:15 -07:30 72 105 177 01:15-01:30 70 115 185 07:15 01 :30 -01 :45 3 7 10 07:30 -07:45 87 105 192 01:30-01:45 107 104 211 07:3( 01 :45 -02:00 7 4 11 07:45 -08:00 84 132 216 01 :45 -02:00 100 115 215 07:45 02:00 -02:15 4 6 10 08:00 -08:15 75 125 200 02:00 -02:15 103 116 219 08:0C 02:15 -02:30 10 11 08:15 -08:30 65 81 146 02:15 -02:30 98 118 216 08:15 02:30 -02:45 4 3 7 08:30 -08:45 87 81 168 02:30 -02:45 105 113 218 08:3( 02:45 -03:00 7 12 19 08:45-09:00 77 83 160 02:45 -03:00 96 152 248 08:45 03:00 -03:15 10 2 12 09:00 -09:15 80 161 03:00 -03:15 92 150 242 09:0C 03:15 -03:30 9 9 18 09:15 -09:30 75 89 164 03:15 -03:30 119 131 250 09:15 03:30 -03:45 7 7 14 09:30 -09:45 65 95 160 03:30 -03:45 107 130 237 09:3( 03:45 -04:00 8 6 14 09:45-10:00 67 78 145 03:45 -04:00 119 108 227 09:45 04:00 -04:15 6 9 15 10:00-10:15 82 96 178 04:00 -04:15 117 55 172 10:0C 04:15 -04:30 9 7 16 10:15 -10:30 80 110 190 04:15 -04:30 0 94 10:15 04:30-04:45 13 11 24 10:30 -10:45 82 87 169 04:30 -04:45 91 0 91 10:3( 04:45 -05:00 12 11 23 10:45-11:00 79 114 193 04:45 -05:00 110 0 110 10:45 05:00 -05:15 11 7 18 11:00-11:15 86 99 185 05:00 -05:15 118 0 118 11:0C 05:15 -05:30 15 9 24 11:15-11:30 77 89 166 05:15 -05:30 81 0 81 11:15 05:30 -05:45 25 21 46 11:30-11:45 93 92 185 05:30 -05:45 76 0 76 11:3( 05:45 -06:00 26 27 53 11:45-12:00 86 123 209 05:45 -06:00 80 0 80 11:45 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) release 48 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) Run Date: 24-M AR-2 2 State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71277000332 Town: DIR 1: +MP DIR2: -MP Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Location: DATE: 10-DEC-20 AM COMMUTER PERIOD (05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 246 246 492 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 337 3, AM -K FACTOR(%) 6.01 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 50 50 100 PM-D(%) 47.33 5; DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 246 246 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 341 3! AM PERIOD (00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 10:45 to 11:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 312 364 676 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 337 3, AM -K FACTOR(%) 8.25 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 100 PM-D(%) 47.33 NON COMMUTER PERIOD (09:00-15:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 6-HR. 12-HR. 24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,396 1, PEAK HR TIME 02:15 to 03:15 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,548 1, PEAK HR VOLUME 302 398 700 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 1,789 2, DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,315 2, PEAK HR TIME 10:30 to 11:30 AM 02:1 S to 03:15 PM 24-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 3,863 4, PEAK HR VOLUME 342 398 D% 47.17 5; TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIM 12:00-12:15 5 9 14 06:00 -06:15 22 16 38 12:00-12:15 73 98 171 06:0C 12:15-12:30 10 11 06:15 -06:30 28 52 80 12:15 -12:30 63 96 159 06:15 12:30 -12:45 4 4 8 06:30 -06:45 31 40 71 12:30 -12:45 72 78 150 06:3( 12:45 -01 :00 4 06:45-07:00 38 35 73 12:45 -01 :00 78 72 150 06:45 01:00-01:15 0 2 2 07:00 -07:15 39 35 74 01:00-01:15 75 73 148 07:0C 01:15-01:30 3 2 5 07:15 -07:30 54 52 106 01:15-01:30 93 87 180 07:15 01 :30 -01 :45 1 3 4 07:30 -07:45 57 58 115 01:30-01:45 75 85 160 07:3( 01 :45 -02:00 2 4 6 07:45 -08:00 50 56 106 01 :45 -02:00 75 96 171 07:45 02:00 -02:15 3 4 08:00 -08:15 65 68 133 02:00 -02:15 72 78 150 08:0C 02:15 -02:30 6 7 08:15 -08:30 52 56 108 02:15 -02:30 72 96 168 08:15 02:30 -02:45 5 1 6 08:30 -08:45 52 45 97 02:30 -02:45 63 100 163 08:3( 02:45 -03:00 4 7 11 08:45-09:00 57 66 123 02:45 -03:00 72 94 166 08:45 03:00 -03:15 6 7 09:00 -09:15 64 62 126 03:00 -03:15 95 108 203 09:0C 03:15 -03:30 7 8 09:15 -09:30 66 59 125 03:15 -03:30 78 81 159 09:15 03:30 -03:45 6 3 9 09:30 -09:45 59 59 118 03:30 -03:45 73 95 168 09:3( 03:45 -04:00 3 3 6 09:45-10:00 49 63 112 03:45 -04:00 95 77 172 09:45 04:00 -04:15 6 3 9 10:00-10:15 61 90 151 04:00 -04:15 76 94 170 10:0C 04:15 -04:30 4 2 6 10:15 -10:30 62 72 134 04:15 -04:30 72 84 156 10:15 04:30-04:45 7 2 9 10:30 -10:45 97 70 167 04:30 -04:45 94 120 214 10:3( 04:45 -05:00 11 6 17 10:45-11:00 89 87 176 04:45 -05:00 57 96 153 10:45 05:00 -05:15 6 5 11 11:00-11:15 79 92 171 05:00 -05:15 78 82 160 11:0C 05:15 -05:30 17 7 24 11:15-11:30 77 84 161 05:15 -05:30 62 86 148 11:15 05:30 -05:45 21 12 33 11:30-11:45 67 101 168 05:30 -05:45 75 79 154 11:3( 05:45 -06:00 25 13 38 11:45-12:00 81 72 153 05:45 -06:00 51 94 145 11:45 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) release 48 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) Run Date: 24-M AR-2 2 State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71277000332 Town: DIR 1: +MP DIR2: -MP Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Location: DATE: 11-DEC-20 AM COMMUTER PERIOD (05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 08:30 to 09:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 276 277 553 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 405 31 AM -K FACTOR(%) 5.92 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 49.91 50.09 100 PM-D(%) 51.2 41 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM 08:30 to 09:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:15 to 04:15 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 287 277 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 411 4( AM PERIOD (00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 11:45 to 12:45 PM PM -PEAK HR TIME 12:00 to 01 :00 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 358 448 806 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 385 4E AM -K FACTOR(%) 8.63 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 49.91 50.09 100 PM-D(%) 51.2 41 NON COMMUTER PERIOD (09:00-15:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 6-HR. 12-HR. 24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,514 1, PEAK HR TIME 12:00 to 01:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,684 1, PEAK HR VOLUME 385 461 846 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,142 2, DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,749 3, PEAK HR TIME 12:00 to 01 :00 PM 12:00 to 01 :00 PM 24-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 4,433 4, PEAK HR VOLUME 385 461 D% 47.49 5; TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIM 12:00-12:15 2 5 7 06:00 -06:15 18 13 31 12:00-12:15 90 118 208 06:0C 12:15-12:30 10 8 18 06:15 -06:30 20 46 66 12:15 -12:30 95 111 206 06:15 12:30 -12:45 3 5 8 06:30 -06:45 31 37 68 12:30 -12:45 97 117 214 06:3( 12:45 -01 :00 10 06:45-07:00 45 41 86 12:45 -01 :00 103 115 218 06:45 01:00-01:15 2 3 5 07:00 -07:15 41 40 81 01:00-01:15 74 95 169 07:0C 01:15-01:30 7 3 10 07:15 -07:30 51 42 93 01:15-01:30 86 97 183 07:15 01 :30 -01 :45 2 8 10 07:30 -07:45 77 54 131 01:30-01:45 108 113 221 07:3( 01 :45 -02:00 2 4 6 07:45 -08:00 78 76 154 01 :45 -02:00 96 100 196 07:45 02:00 -02:15 4 5 9 08:00 -08:15 58 44 102 02:00 -02:15 82 103 185 08:0C 02:15 -02:30 2 4 6 08:15 -08:30 44 59 103 02:15 -02:30 99 94 193 08:15 02:30 -02:45 4 2 6 08:30 -08:45 63 68 131 02:30 -02:45 82 94 176 08:3( 02:45 -03:00 2 2 4 08:45-09:00 67 62 129 02:45 -03:00 87 102 189 08:45 03:00 -03:15 3 3 6 09:00 -09:15 67 70 137 03:00 -03:15 82 130 212 09:0C 03:15 -03:30 5 3 8 09:15 -09:30 79 77 156 03:15 -03:30 99 89 188 09:15 03:30 -03:45 8 7 15 09:30 -09:45 74 56 130 03:30 -03:45 100 93 193 09:3( 03:45 -04:00 4 3 7 09:45-10:00 64 68 132 03:45 -04:00 100 83 183 09:45 04:00 -04:15 10 4 14 10:00-10:15 73 86 159 04:00 -04:15 112 101 213 10:0C 04:15 -04:30 5 6 11 10:15 -10:30 70 92 162 04:15 -04:30 89 97 186 10:15 04:30-04:45 11 7 18 10:30 -10:45 88 84 172 04:30 -04:45 104 105 209 10:3( 04:45 -05:00 15 4 19 10:45-11:00 74 98 172 04:45 -05:00 69 103 172 10:45 05:00 -05:15 11 6 17 11:00-11:15 75 92 167 05:00 -05:15 89 83 172 11:0C 05:15 -05:30 16 12 28 11:15-11:30 95 100 195 05:15 -05:30 76 86 162 11:15 05:30 -05:45 13 6 19 11:30-11:45 86 103 189 05:30 -05:45 70 82 152 11:3( 05:45 -06:00 24 21 45 11:45-12:00 76 102 178 05:45 -06:00 53 117 170 11:45 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) release 48 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) Run Date: 24-M AR-2 2 State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71277000332 Town: DIR 1: +MP DIR2: -M P Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Location: DATE: 26-APR-21 AM COMMUTER PERIOD (05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 07:45 to 08:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 290 324 614 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 496 5' AM -K FACTOR(%) 5.81 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 47.23 52.77 100 PM-D(%) 47.51 5; DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 07:45 to 08:45 AM 07:30 to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 290 324 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 496 5' AM PERIOD (00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 11:30to 12:30 PM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 404 436 840 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 496 5' AM -K FACTOR(%) 7.95 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 47.23 52.77 100 PM-D(%) 47.51 NON COMMUTER PERIOD (09:00-15:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 6-HR. 12-HR. 24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 1,710 1, PEAK HR TIME 02:30 to 03:30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 1,875 2, PEAK HR VOLUME 431 526 957 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 2,320 2, DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 2,876 3, PEAK HR TIME 02:30 to 03:30 PM 02:30 to 03:30 PM 24-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 4,751 5, PEAK HR VOLUME 431 526 D% 44.94 5! TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIM 12:00-12:15 5 11 16 06:00 -06:15 34 21 55 12:00-12:15 94 113 207 06:0C 12:15-12:30 5 8 13 06:15 -06:30 36 46 82 12:15 -12:30 98 109 207 06:15 12:30 -12:45 4 8 12 06:30 -06:45 43 43 86 12:30 -12:45 84 110 194 06:3( 12:45 -01 :00 4 9 06:45-07:00 56 56 112 12:45 -01 :00 113 131 244 06:45 01:00-01:15 3 5 8 07:00 -07:15 40 51 91 01:00-01:15 90 129 219 07:0C 01:15-01:30 5 5 10 07:15 -07:30 66 69 135 01:15-01:30 75 101 176 07:15 01 :30 -01 :45 4 6 10 07:30 -07:45 68 82 150 01:30-01:45 81 92 173 07:3( 01 :45 -02:00 0 2 2 07:45 -08:00 78 86 164 01 :45 -02:00 82 122 204 07:45 02:00 -02:15 1 2 3 08:00 -08:15 62 80 142 02:00 -02:15 93 119 212 08:0C 02:15 -02:30 3 3 6 08:15 -08:30 76 76 152 02:15 -02:30 71 112 183 08:15 02:30 -02:45 2 3 5 08:30 -08:45 74 82 156 02:30 -02:45 122 130 252 08:3( 02:45 -03:00 2 2 4 08:45-09:00 61 77 138 02:45 -03:00 107 132 239 08:45 03:00 -03:15 4 5 9 09:00 -09:15 62 63 125 03:00 -03:15 103 140 243 09:0C 03:15 -03:30 7 7 14 09:15 -09:30 71 80 151 03:15 -03:30 99 124 223 09:15 03:30 -03:45 6 7 09:30 -09:45 76 74 150 03:30 -03:45 93 123 216 09:3( 03:45 -04:00 2 8 10 09:45-10:00 71 91 162 03:45 -04:00 123 136 259 09:45 04:00 -04:15 6 7 10:00-10:15 87 99 186 04:00 -04:15 133 132 265 10:0C 04:15 -04:30 4 11 15 10:15 -10:30 83 115 198 04:15 -04:30 111 138 249 10:15 04:30-04:45 8 6 14 10:30 -10:45 88 93 181 04:30 -04:45 129 142 271 10:3( 04:45 -05:00 9 6 15 10:45-11:00 84 102 186 04:45 -05:00 101 119 220 10:45 05:00 -05:15 14 9 23 11:00-11:15 95 116 211 05:00 -05:15 77 133 210 11:0C 05:15 -05:30 18 10 28 11:15-11:30 87 114 201 05:15 -05:30 88 107 195 11:15 05:30 -05:45 19 14 33 11:30-11:45 109 109 218 05:30 -05:45 83 94 177 11:3( 05:45 -06:00 29 23 52 11:45-12:00 103 105 208 05:45 -06:00 70 90 160 11:45 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) release 48 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) Run Date: 24-M AR-2 2 State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71277000332 Town: DIR 1: +MP DIR2: -M P Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Location: DATE: 27-APR-21 AM COMMUTER PERIOD (05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD (15:00-19:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 382 366 748 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 1,080 AM -K FACTOR(%) 5.36 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 51.07 48.93 100 PM-D(%) 57.05 4; DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM 07:30 to 08:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 382 370 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 1,080 AM PERIOD (00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL PM PERIOD (12:00-24:00) DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM -PEAK HR TIME 10:30 to 11:30 AM PM -PEAK HR TIME 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM -PEAK HR VOLUME 473 459 932 PM -PEAK HR VOLUME 1,080 AM -K FACTOR(%) 6.68 PM -K FACTOR(%) AM-D(%) 51.07 48.93 100 PM-D(%) 57.05 4; NON COMMUTER PERIOD (09:00-15:00) DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 6-HR. 12-HR. 24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 D TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD (06:00-12:00) 2,102 2, PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD (00:00-12:00) 2,268 2, PEAK HR VOLUME 887 803 1,690 PM 6-HR PERIOD (12:00-18:00) 4,138 3, DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 4,731 4, PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM 02:00 to 03:00 PM 24-HR PERIOD (12:00-24:00) 6,999 6, PEAK HR VOLUME 887 803 D% 50.14 4! TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIM 12:00-12:15 8 9 06:00 -06:15 21 22 43 12:00-12:15 132 115 247 06:0C 12:15-12:30 4 6 10 06:15 -06:30 37 43 80 12:15 -12:30 129 108 237 06:15 12:30 -12:45 5 9 14 06:30 -06:45 51 60 111 12:30 -12:45 98 114 212 06:3( 12:45 -01 :00 3 7 10 06:45-07:00 39 48 87 12:45 -01 :00 114 105 219 06:45 01:00-01:15 0 1 07:00 -07:15 56 59 115 01:00-01:15 177 202 379 07:0C 01:15-01:30 1 3 4 07:15 -07:30 74 70 144 01:15-01:30 202 180 382 07:15 01 :30 -01 :45 5 6 11 07:30 -07:45 69 94 163 01:30-01:45 171 187 358 07:3( 01 :45 -02:00 7 8 07:45 -08:00 105 116 221 01 :45 -02:00 223 187 410 07:45 02:00 -02:15 5 2 7 08:00 -08:15 85 82 167 02:00 -02:15 230 211 441 08:0C 02:15 -02:30 0 4 4 08:15 -08:30 80 78 158 02:15 -02:30 215 199 414 08:15 02:30 -02:45 4 6 10 08:30 -08:45 78 74 152 02:30 -02:45 191 203 394 08:3( 02:45 -03:00 3 8 08:45-09:00 80 87 167 02:45 -03:00 220 190 410 08:45 03:00 -03:15 0 4 4 09:00 -09:15 99 86 185 03:00 -03:15 214 196 410 09:0C 03:15 -03:30 3 6 9 09:15 -09:30 116 90 206 03:15 -03:30 211 212 423 09:15 03:30 -03:45 4 4 8 09:30 -09:45 87 103 190 03:30 -03:45 242 205 447 09:3( 03:45 -04:00 8 9 09:45-10:00 111 88 199 03:45 -04:00 271 202 473 09:45 04:00 -04:15 5 5 10 10:00-10:15 105 86 191 04:00 -04:15 267 193 460 10:0C 04:15 -04:30 3 8 11 10:15 -10:30 114 82 196 04:15 -04:30 300 213 513 10:15 04:30-04:45 10 16 26 10:30 -10:45 115 115 230 04:30 -04:45 101 132 233 10:3( 04:45 -05:00 12 6 18 10:45-11:00 116 122 238 04:45 -05:00 100 129 229 10:45 05:00 -05:15 13 8 21 11:00-11:15 123 118 241 05:00 -05:15 93 91 184 11:0C 05:15 -05:30 28 11 39 11:15-11:30 119 104 223 05:15 -05:30 79 98 177 11:15 05:30 -05:45 23 19 42 11:30-11:45 112 103 215 05:30 -05:45 76 107 183 11:3( 05:45 -06:00 30 23 53 11:45-12:00 110 107 217 05:45 -06:00 82 97 179 11:45 HOOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v48) release 48 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Manono St --Hawaii Route 19/Mamalahoa Hwy CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI QCJOB#: 15767801 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 _J 1 L... at � tl 7 ... I 0 _J: �L N/A • • N/A • •• + N/A ,/rel\. • .. - -"\ ---r .. 7: t :1 N/A 15-Min Count ManonoSt Period (Northbound) Beginning At Left Thru Right 6:30AM 21 11 7 6:45AM 21 12 147:00AM 47 12 8 7:15 AM 46 15 10 7:30AM 55 14 177:45AM 40 18 148:00AM 37 15 178:15AM 48 14 20 8:30AM 31 11 18 8:45AM 47 12 30 9:00AM 39 12 199:15AM 48 14 11 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right All Vehicles 220 56 68Heavy Trucks 4 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 4/14/2022 4:25 PM u Left 0 20 2 0 6 0 2 0 50 4 0 8 0 9 0 705 0 10 0 9 u Left 0 20 0 0 Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -8:30 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM --7:45 AM cr Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts _!l .i l L +---- +---- � ---+ ---+ �7 i rr ManonoSt Hawaii Route 19/Mamalahoa (Southbound) Hwy (Eastbound) Thru Right u Left Thru Right u 4 12 0 7 57 47 0 6 15 0 13 80 47 0 17 18 0 20 103 63 0 16 12 0 21 116 74 0 21 23 0 15 133 79 0 10 34 0 26 124 88 0 19 28 0 23 110 65 0 20 23 0 24 103 58 0 26 37 0 22 113 72 0 24 16 0 26 124 88 0 16 27 0 17 105 63 0 21 29 0 19 105 61 0 Southbound Eastbound Thru Right u Left Thru Right u 84 92 0 60 532 316 0 0 0 4 48 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 _J; t L14 0 •.. 3.1+34,I \. 0 + 3 4.7 • ... • 2.9 4.4 • 4.1 "\ ("53♦4.4 7�3��, 3.8 42 Hawaii Route 19/Mamalahoa Hwy Total Hourly(Westbound) Totals Left Thru Right u 3 105 3 0 2795 115 2 0 332 10 144 1 0 44912 157 2 0 483 1543 11 198 4 1 576 1840 14 185 4 0 561 206920 170 2 0 514 2134 11 167 2 0 499 2150 20 156 4 0 517 209111 119 4 0 506 203612 121 9 0 450 197216 137 4 0 474 1947 Westbound Total Left Thru Right u 44 792 16 4 2304 0 12 0 88 0 4 0 0 0 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC {http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Manono St --Hawaii Route 19/Mamalahoa Hwy CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI QCJOB#: 15767803 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 188EJ158 _J; 70 l1L., ... 968•96.t 1,,9•678 �575. � • fa;�100) • 389 '\ t' 64 • 641 7� � �r--s�E];) 2 ... � ... 1 15-Min Count ManonoSt Period (Northbound) Beginning At Left Thru Right 3:00 PM 61 8 153:15 PM 58 11 11 3:30 PM 59 8 11 3:45 PM 55 18 14 4:00 PM 77 15 13 4:15 PM 63 13 9 4:30 PM 70 8 9 4:45 PM 51 20 155:00 PM 51 13 13 5:15 PM 47 21 14 5:30 PM 55 16 6 5:45 PM 29 11 4 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right All Vehicles 308 60 52 Heavy Trucks 4 0 4 Buses Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 4/14/2022 4:26 PM u Left05 0 60 601 0 10 0 5 0 5 0 50 9 0 30 3 0 12 u Left0 40 0 0 Peak-Hour: 3:45 PM -4:45 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM --4:15 PM cr Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts L +--- +--- ---+ ---+ 7 i rr ManonoSt Hawaii Route 19/Mamalahoa (Southbound) Hwy (Eastbound) Thru Right u Left Thru Right u 17 19 0 23 126 84 0 17 16 0 28 131 74 0 10 24 0 28 126 98 0 16 24 0 27 143 97 0 21 28 0 27 149 105 0 17 27 0 22 127 87 1 16 18 0 19 156 100 0 10 14 0 27 122 90 0 13 28 0 31 117 59 0 19 28 0 22 114 70 0 16 20 0 26 103 56 0 15 27 0 23 113 63 0 Southbound Eastbound Thru Right u Left Thru Right u 84 112 0 108 596 420 0 0 0 0 4 4 8 8 0 0 0 0 4 05 13 _J�t L0 0 •.. 05 • 1 .t 1,, 0 • 04 0.7 • ... • 05 0.7 • 05 '\ ('0 •0.8 7� • �, 1.9 04 0.8 Hawaii Route 19/Mamalahoa Hwy Total Hourly(Westbound) Totals Left Thru Right u 12 156 3 0 529 12 178 1 0 543 11 160 2 0 543 14 129 5 0 543 2158 14 147 1 0 607 2236 15 169 0 0 555 2248 21 160 3 0 585 229010 131 2 0 497 2244 11 107 4 0 456 2093 7 110 2 0 457 19956 118 5 0 430 1840 9 78 3 0 387 1730 Westbound Total Left Thru Right u 56 588 4 0 2428 0 4 0 20 0 16 0 0 0 4 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC {http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: System-wide Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hawaii Route 11/Mamalahoa Hwy --Piilani St CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI QCJOB#: 15767804 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -8:30 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM --7:45 AM cr 0 • ... • 0 4.8•5.8'\ I" 0 • 0 Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts 0 ... � _ju l... 0 ---t i T 15_Min Count Hawaii Rout� 11/M amalahoa Hawaii Rout� 11/M amalah oa Piilani St Piilani St Perio d wy wy (Eastb oun d) (Westb oun d) Total Hourly Beginning At 1----�(N_o_rt_h_b_o_u _n _d�) ______ (�So_u_t_h _b _ou_n_d�) ___ ,__ _____________________ __,Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 6:30 AM 35 171 0 0 0 88 2 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 AM 44 183 0 1 0 123 3 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 59 229 0 1 0 135 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 48 210 0 0 0 164 2 0 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 70 279 0 0 0 146 11 0 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 56 218 0 0 0 182 11 0 2 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 37 251 0 1 0 177 17 0 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 36 198 0 1 0 154 13 0 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 31 206 0 0 0 173 25 0 2 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 41 177 0 0 0 191 29 0 2 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 AM 28 169 0 0 0 183 19 0 3 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 AM 26 191 0 0 0 201 14 1 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 Peak 15-Min t-----,,---N...,.o_rt_h_b_o_u _n,....d ___ +----,,---s,....ou_t_h _b_ou_n...,.d _____ -,---.,...Ea_s _tb_o_u _n ...,.d _____ -,--_W-,--es_t_b_ou_n...,.d ___ -tFlowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 280 1116 0 0 0 584 44 0 16 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Trucks 20 44 0 0 44 16 0 0 4 0 0 0 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: 306 364 441 437 1548 523 1765 485 1886 499 1944 413 1920 481 1878 461 1854 426 1781 445 1813 Total 2092 128 0 0 Report generated on 4/15/2022 6:54 AM SOURCE : Quality Counts, LLC {http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: System-wide Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hawaii Route 11/Mamalahoa Hwy --Piilani St CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI QCJOB#: 15767806 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 913E]m _J: 874 �L ., . .. 1Ei6•8J ..,o .. o [§Jo• � .. oQJ 117 • 103 "\ I' 0 • 0 7;� �r--�E]�I 0 ... � ... 0 Peak-Hour: 3:45 PM -4:45 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM --4:15 PM cr Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts _ju l ---t i T 27 _J� 2.6 • 2.8 "\ 7� 3A t 2.9 0 ... L 15_Min Count Hawaii Rout� 11/Mamalahoa Hawaii Rout� 11/Mamalahoa Piilani St Piilani St Period wy wy (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At 1----�(N_o_rt_h_b_o_u _n _d�) ______ (�So_u_t _h _b _ou_n_d�) ___ ,__ _____________________ __,Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:00 PM 37 222 0 2 0 196 10 0 2 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 PM 17 218 0 1 0 218 9 0 3 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 PM 44 212 0 2 0 211 7 0 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 PM 44 199 0 0 0 210 7 0 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM 28 199 0 1 0 232 15 0 2 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 29 181 0 0 0 186 8 0 2 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 26 186 0 1 0 246 9 0 3 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 42 171 0 0 0 192 1 0 2 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 11 158 0 0 0 172 8 0 1 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 19 157 0 0 0 166 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 22 170 0 0 0 174 4 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 21 149 0 0 0 176 6 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 Peak 15-Min t-----,,,--N...,.o_rt_h_b_o_u_n,....d ___ +----,,---s,....ou_t_h _b_ou_n...,.d _____ -,---.,...Ea_s_tb_o_u_n...,.d _____ -,--_W-,--es_t_b_ou_n...,.d ___ -tFlowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 112 796 0 4 0 928 60 0 8 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Trucks 4 24 0 0 40 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: 503 491 498 480 1972 511 1980 436 1925 497 1924 435 1879 377 1745 360 1669 386 1558 366 1489 To tal 2044 72 0 0 Report generated on 4/15/2022 6:58 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC {http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: System-wide Peak LOCATION: Manono St --Piilani St CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI 3916299 _J; 315 :L ., ♦ .. 51•17.J \,77+124 �6• � •16� 29♦6'\ 1"31•131 7; � ;r--�E]�I 0 ... � ... 0 _J: N/A �L♦ • N/A • •• • N/A .J rel\. • • - -'\ ---r • 7: t :1 N/A 15-Min Count ManonoSt Period (Northbound) Beginning At Left Thru Right 6:30AM 1 26 14 6:45AM 0 31 16 7:00AM 0 54 15 7:15 AM 2 40 13 7:30AM 2 61 22 7:45AM 0 47 19 8:00AM 4 42 17 8:15AM 2 55 18 8:30AM 0 48 14 8:45AM 0 so 21 9:00AM 1 44 14 9:15AM 1 49 14 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right All Vehicles 8 244 88 Heavy Trucks 0 12 4 Buses Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 4/15/2022 6:54 AM u Left 0 9 0 6 0 11 0 10 0 8 0 14 0 15 0 12 0 14 0 12 0 20 0 12 u Left 0 32 4 0 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -8:30 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM --7:45 AM cr Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts -+ -, ManonoSt Piilani St (Southbound) (Eastbound) Thru Right u Left Thru Right 38 1 0 2 1 0 43 4 0 1 2 0 61 10 0 0 0 3 55 5 0 6 3 1 86 7 0 5 2 3 77 6 0 4 2 0 90 8 0 3 0 1 62 6 0 5 2 2 83 7 0 5 1 1 87 8 0 5 3 2 75 5 0 1 9 3 74 4 0 2 5 3 Southbound Eastbound Thru Right u Left Thru Right 344 28 0 20 8 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 Left 4 2 1 4 6 3 13 9 5 8 9 3 Left 24 0 0 QCJOB#: 15767807 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 3.8 _J� 0 • 59 J 43 3.8 6·1L ♦ .. \.39•4.8 16.7♦ .... • 0 Piilani St Hourly(Westbound) Total Thru Right u Totals 2 7 0 105 4 11 0 120 3 8 0 166 7 18 0 164 555 3 16 0 221 671 3 19 0 194 745 7 15 0 215 794 3 27 0 203 833 4 19 0 201 813 12 22 0 230 849 2 30 0 213 847 5 19 0 191 835 Westbound Total Thru Right u 12 64 0 884 0 0 28 0 0 4 0 4 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: Manono St --Piilani St CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI 467E]358 _J: 361 !L., ♦ .. 2 ... � ... 0 _J: N/A �L♦ • N/A • •• + N/A ,/rel\. • .. - -"\ ---r .. 7: t :1 N/A 15-Min Count ManonoSt Period (Northbound) Beginning At Left Thru Right 3:00 PM 1 41 13 3:15 PM 4 56 13 3:30 PM 1 60 20 3:45 PM 3 71 15 4:00 PM 0 66 13 4:15 PM 2 59 24 4:30 PM 1 67 15 4:45 PM 0 63 13 5:00 PM 3 62 13 5:15 PM 0 54 11 5:30 PM 1 48 17 5:45 PM 0 58 10 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right All Vehicles 12 284 60 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 Buses Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 4/14/2022 4:26 PM u Left 0 9 0 22 0 9 0 12 0 21 0 21 0 22 0 23 0 11 0 15 0 12 0 7 u Left 0 48 0 0 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Peak-Hour: 3:45 PM -4:45 PM Peak 15-Min: 3:45 PM --4:00 PM cr Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts -+ -, ManonoSt Piilani St (Southbound) (Eastbound) Thru Right u Left Thru Right 95 9 0 1 6 2 66 5 0 8 6 2 88 5 0 6 4 1 95 8 0 3 3 6 101 4 0 5 2 1 71 12 0 7 3 3 94 6 0 3 1 3 81 10 0 6 0 3 80 6 0 1 2 1 77 2 0 4 0 2 57 5 0 6 4 1 63 2 0 3 3 1 Southbound Eastbound Thru Right u Left Thru Right 380 32 0 12 12 24 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 u Left 0 9 0 8 0 6 0 10 0 7 0 13 0 9 0 12 0 2 0 5 0 8 0 4 u Left 0 40 0 0 QCJOB#: 15767809DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 0.4 _J� Q.6 t 0.6 0 ♦.. L \,0 +0.8 ... +59 r o .. o 7� 05 Piilani St Hourly(Westbound) Total Thru Right u Totals 8 20 0 214 6 16 0 212 5 18 0 223 5 19 0 250 899 5 22 0 247 932 5 21 0 241 961 2 15 0 238 976 7 14 0 232 958 6 20 0 207 918 2 12 0 184 861 8 14 0 181 804 8 6 0 165 737 Westbound Total Thru Right u 20 76 0 1000 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: Manono St --Kekuanaoa StCITY/STATE: Hilo, HI _J3:EJ�L 69 204 75 ., ... 538•89.J \. 25 • 447 �Zffi .. §] •397� 389 • 32 '\ f' 25 • 392 7., t .-r; 244 :12618365 _J at7 1 ... � ...0 _J: N/A �L• .. N/A • •• • N/A J rel\. .. • - -"---(' • 7: t :1 N/A 15-Min Count ManonoSt Period (Northbound) Beginning At Left Thru Right 6:30AM 8 33 19 6:45AM 8 44 13 7:00AM 10 so 9 7:15 AM 14 53 127:30AM 25 68 177:45AM 27 60 7 8:00AM 8 64 14 8:15AM 12 52 11 8:30AM 10 42 4 8:45AM 15 53 9 9:00AM 11 33 139:15AM 12 so 5 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right All Vehicles 100 272 68Heavy Trucks 12 4 0 Buses Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 4/14/2022 4:25 PM u0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u0 Left 139 1317 17 181822 142617 19 Left 680 0 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -8:30 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM --7:45 AM cr Quality CountsO.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts L _.,.... 7 ManonoSt Kekuanaoa St (Southbound) (Eastbound) Thru Right u Left Thru Right 27 6 0 16 46 322 9 0 7 65 1 43 13 0 10 54 6 43 13 0 24 57 13 40 13 0 26 73 9 61 21 0 20 64 8 55 20 0 24 71 8 48 15 0 19 60 7 38 12 0 23 66 8 68 19 0 23 82 13 43 24 0 16 73 1256 25 0 19 72 7 Southbound Eastbound Thru Right u Left Thru Right 160 52 0 104 292 36 0 4 4 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 u0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u0 Left 46 446 7 6 6 4 8 8 11 Left 24 0 0 QCJOB#: 15767810DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 4.6 4.2 _J 7 � t L25 8 •.. 35•22J \. 4 • 27 2.6 • ... .. 25 23♦0'\('4 ♦3.8 7� •:114.9 23 4.9 Kekuanaoa St Hourly(Westbound) Total Thru Right u Totals 48 4 0 22761 5 0 250 94 7 0 313 93 6 0 349 1139 120 6 0 420 1332 91 4 0 388 1470 94 8 0 390 1547 92 7 0 351 154987 8 0 316 144586 15 0 417 1474 93 15 0 358 1442 74 10 0 360 1451 Westbound Total Thru Right u480 24 0 1680 8 0 40 0 4 0 0 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: System-wide Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Manono St --Kekuanaoa St CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI QC JOB#: 15767812 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 05 1A 441E]359 _J� 258 �L ., ... Peak-Hour: 3:45 PM -4:45 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM --4:45 PM _J �o411L ., ... 479 • 106 J 02•09J �385 .. � cr 16 ..... •03 Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts 3 ... � L ... 1 ... 7 15-Min Count Manono St Manono St Kekuanaoa St Kekuanaoa St Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beg ·1nn1·ng At t------=--......,.---�----t----=-�....,...----,-�---+--,,...-�-,-----�------11-----=--.,_,..-----,-�---t Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:00 PM 11 43 8 0 25 76 25 0 15 95 8 0 11 110 10 0 3:15 PM 19 67 13 0 14 54 18 0 21 82 8 0 14 85 6 0 3:30 PM 13 69 12 0 17 66 17 0 26 99 7 0 15 112 5 0 3:45 PM 10 44 16 0 22 66 26 0 30 101 13 0 13 83 15 0 4:00 PM 13 58 10 0 22 62 27 0 30 86 18 0 36 84 4 0 4:15 PM 11 52 10 0 23 57 20 0 25 105 15 0 23 82 11 0 4:30 PM 12 60 12 0 26 73 17 0 21 93 15 0 23 94 9 0 4:45 PM 13 65 9 0 19 59 16 0 26 87 6 0 19 76 7 0 5:00 PM 10 49 2 0 20 65 15 0 22 84 10 0 25 67 4 0 5:15 PM 11 46 2 0 12 72 10 0 26 66 10 0 8 54 6 0 5:30 PM 7 54 8 0 13 54 14 0 20 60 7 0 11 56 5 0 5:45 PM 8 48 20 0 14 44 13 0 16 55 4 0 2 57 4 0 Pe ak 15-Min Northbound Sou thbound Eastbound Westbound Flowra tes ,__L_e_ft __ T_h_r _u_R_i _g-ht--U---Le-ft--T-hru--R-ig_h_t--U---L-e ft--T-h-ru--R-ig_h_t--U---L-e ft--T-h-ru--R-ig_h_t--U--t All Vehicles 48 240 48 0 104 292 68 0 84 372 60 0 92 376 36 0 Heavy Trucks 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 Buses Pedestrians Bicycles Scooters Comments: 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 437 401 458 439 1735 450 1748 434 1781 455 1778 402 1741 373 1664 323 1553 309 1407 285 1290 Total 1820 20 8 0 Report generated on 4/15/2022 6:58 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.quahtycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: Mililani St --Kekuanaoa StCITY/STATE: Hilo, HI _J at 7 2 ... � ... 3 _J: N/A �L • • N/A • •• + N/A ,/rel\. • .. - -"\ ---r .. 7: t :1 N/A 15-Min Count Mililani St Period (Northbound) Beginning At Left Thru Right 6:30AM 2 0 1 6:45AM 2 1 3 7:00AM 0 2 0 7:15 AM 1 1 0 7:30AM 1 1 2 7:45AM 6 0 2 8:00AM 1 0 0 8:15AM 0 0 4 8:30AM 3 1 0 8:45AM 0 1 1 9:00AM 1 0 2 9:15AM 1 0 0 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right All Vehicles 24 0 8 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 Buses Pedestrians 12 Bicycles 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 4/14/2022 4:25 PM u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 Left 1 2 1 0 4 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 Left 4 0 0 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -8:30 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM --8:00 AM cr Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts L +- -+ 7 Mililani St Kekuanaoa St (Southbound) (Eastbound) Thru Right u Left Thru Right 0 1 0 1 57 1 1 5 0 1 70 1 1 18 0 7 71 0 0 7 0 7 75 1 2 7 0 5 113 1 1 7 0 7 90 1 0 5 0 1 98 2 0 10 0 4 95 1 0 8 0 5 79 0 1 15 0 8 110 1 1 6 0 4 105 3 0 7 0 3 103 0 Southbound Eastbound Thru Right u Left Thru Right 4 28 0 28 360 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 Left 0 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 2 Left 4 0 0 QCJOB#:15767813 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 0 0 _J� t L0 0 •.. 3 + 0 ,I \,0+32 25 • ... + 32 2.4 ♦0"\ ,0 .. 2.4 7� t ,. I0 0 t 0 0 Kekuanaoa St Hourly(Westbound) Total Thru Right u Totals 62 0 0 126 77 0 0 163 99 3 0 204 124 2 0 218 711 129 4 0 271 856 157 1 0 274 967 125 1 0 235 998 116 1 0 232 1012 103 3 0 203 944 121 2 0 261 931 121 2 0 247 943 112 1 0 229 940 Westbound Total Thru Right u 628 4 0 1096 20 0 28 0 12 0 0 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: Mililani St --Kekuanaoa StCITY/STATE: Hilo, HI 43631 _J :1 2 �L., ... 520•18.I \,9•491 �538 • � • 478� 572•16"\ 1'4•552 7 ? ! �r--�E]�I _J at7 15-Min CountPeriodBeginning At 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Peak 15-Min Flowrates All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Buses Pedestrians Bicycles Scooters Comments: 2 ... � ... 1 Mililani St (Northbound) Left Thru Right 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 4 0 3 4 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 3 1 0 Northbound Left Thru Right 0 12 16 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Report generated on 4/14/2022 4:27 PM u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 Left 0 0 0 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Peak-Hour: 3:45 PM -4:45 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:15 PM --4:30 PM cr Quality Counts O.U-4 11 a c-•N"m.ts L+- 7 Mililani St Kekuanaoa St (Southbound) (Eastbound) Thru Right u Left Thru Right 3 12 0 6 119 0 1 11 0 8 112 2 1 10 0 5 133 1 0 15 0 4 129 4 1 6 0 4 135 3 1 13 0 5 139 5 0 7 0 5 135 4 1 7 0 4 118 4 0 11 0 2 112 1 0 9 0 4 100 0 1 10 0 5 93 3 4 10 0 7 78 1 Southbound Eastbound Thru Right u Left Thru Right 4 52 0 20 556 20 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 Left 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Left 4 0 0 QCJOB#:15767815 DATE: Wed, Apr 6 2022 4.7 0 _J� t L0 0 •.. 04•0,I \. 0 .. 0 0.7 • ... .. 0 09•63"\ (' 0 • 09 7� • :110 4.5 53 Kekuanaoa St Hourly(Westbound) Total Thru Right u Totals 142 3 0 289 139 2 0 278 120 3 0 274 122 3 0 282 1123 116 2 0 275 1109 119 2 0 292 1123 121 2 0 276 1125 110 3 0 251 1094 77 6 0 211 1030 80 4 0 206 944 57 5 0 176 844 86 2 1 193 786 Westbound Total Thru Right u 476 8 0 1168 0 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of report: Tube Count -Volume Data LOCATION: Manono St btwn Kuawa St and Piilani St SPECIFIC LOCATION: CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week 6 Apr 22 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00AM 40 40 40 01:00AM 28 28 28 02:00AM 34 34 34 03:00AM 23 23 23 04:00AM 57 57 57 05:00AM 144 144 144 06:00AM 328 328 328 07:00AM 674 674 674 08:00AM 724 724 724 09:00AM 684 684 684 10:00AM 749 749 749 11:00AM 12:00 PM 818 818 818 01:00 PM 789 789 789 02:00 PM 715 715 715 03:00 PM 765 765 765 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 620 620 620 06:00 PM 471 471 471 07:00 PM 301 301 301 08:00 PM 236 236 236 09:00 PM 154 154 154 10:00 PM 102 102 102 11:00 PM 56 56 56 Day Total 10149 10149 10149 %Weekday 100% Average %Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:00AM 11:00AM 11:00AM Volume 803 803 803 PM Peak 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 4:00 PM Volume 834 834 834 Comments: Report generated on 4/14/2022 4:23 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts Page 1 of 1 ArcGIS v My Map 0 Details I 88 Basemap About @ Content g Legend Contents r.i Hawai· 20� 8 PR -�awaii PR 2018 i� m � v I ► G) Topograph·c ◄ + Q 0 C 0 C .. ArcGIS v My Map 0 Details I 88 Basemap 0 About CB Content g Legend Contents r.i Hawai· 2018 PR -Hawaii PR 2018 i� m J ,1 I ►G>-opographic ◄ + Q ArcGIS v My Map 0 Details I �8 Basemap About G Conte"lt ;; Legend ◄ Contents � Hawai· 20 • 8 PR -Hawaii PR 2018 ;j 1ml _ � I ► CJ) Topograph·c 1Etkt1Dli8GB 51 ArcGIS v My Map 0 Deta·ls I B8 Basemap 4)About � Conte"t i:: Legend Contents � Hawaii 2018 PR -Hawaii PR 2018 ·-"""' .r, i..!IEEl_ 'fl" ►G>-opograph·c ◄ [Q] Waltoa River State Park .,, .. ... ,.. ::a 0. Appendix B -Bus Route Maps Bus Stop ID# A B en (") -:c ro_ .!: (l) ro ..: ::J (l) E > (U - .... <( 0.. C <D ro (l) I-..c @) (..) C) (/) (l) ·-C ::J E Q) § :a co ro (l) a.= ::J ..c � ::J ::J ro <D en <( co <D E ·-->, c--..c (l) ::J (l) C _o E a. (l) ::J o ro ::J � 0 �::::.:::: <( en o 100 101 C cn E(/) 0e� 0 (/) "C'<( (/) (l) @) e c0 (l) (l) � (..) ::J - C) C (l) C (l) (l) ·-> .... a.<( -a.en o ro ro ..c � ro en � ..c .Q ·- 0 ·-::::.:::: ::::.:::: :::c 103 Hilo D -en �0::J =ro :::C � I ·c ==ro ro ....J � @)� --en o ·->,C:t= ro cn -.... 0 (l) ·->Q. ._ <U C ::::.:::: :::> 105 Kea'au E F G H ::J (/) ro ...-... (l) C -ro 8ro 0 (l) (l) ·-(l) £�::::.:::: � � ·ro .... (/) @)� ro � a. - � ro (l) >, "O (/) C)@) 0 -:::c (l) ro o ro <D @) 0 -�E 0 a. @) lB -o o::: en u5 0 -(..) � ro :::c 0 :::> (l) >, c"-" 0 (l) -en N � = ..c .... ·-::J � C (U "O -C .2 0::: ·3: 0 en ::J ..c a. (l) ro en = E 0 0 .... o ro > 0::::.:::: ..c ·-E ::J :c � � 0 "O ..c. C) ..c ::J ..c s:c - ro ::::.:::: (..) O:::S::::(..) 0 a. 106 107 110 901 This route operates Monday-Saturday only. There is no Sunday or holiday service. --- = bus does not serve timepoint. Effective A� Southbound to Oceanvi Fern Mo, Kurtistown Acres V J z c...-... - -� .... o2 0 0 ti Q) (l) (l) "O "O ·-..ct:: (/)·w ·w........ ::J ::::.:::: (/) � � ::J @) ..0 @) @) (/)..... "O ..... (/) ..... ..... 0 ..... � ...... >, .... � 0::: >, ro o ro ��� ·c �..c � ..c ro ..c C) .... c,-C) ·- ro ·- ::J :E :::c a. :::c ::::.:::: 903 TBA f To read the timetable, read from left to right to follow the course of the route and then read down for the times that the bus without notice. Times are approximate and may vary depending on traffic conditions, weather and other conditions. Not all Hele-On bus stops are shown. Please flag the bus along its route at safe intersections where the bus can safely pul $15. 00 entrance fee or a visitor pass required to get off the bus at Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park. Entrance fees are vai --co =II:"' co 0 co 0 w �I co 0 ;J:> I o, �I co 0 ;J:>1-...J � (.,.) co Ooco ....>. I CO 0 (0 (0 ....i. co -t ;J:>I� (0 ....i. (0 011 � 'l> C) Ocean View Park & Ride @ <o -· (') -t CD CD Prince Kuhio Blvd � II) = -:e IHwy 11 @ Kamaoa Road (in I 1 5- front Wong Yuen Store) c,n =. :::, C -I Hwy 11 @ Ohai Road z II) (Naalehu Elementary II) :::a i' School) ':r C -I Punaluu Road @ Punaluu Beach Park 1° 11 c .,, Kamani St @ Pahala II) .,, ':r Shopping Center II) < Z O ::C I l .,,�nm !Crater Rim Drive @ Visitor Center 0 II)-· II) ::e -,0:::,11) �:::, 0 -·!. Cl) -� IOld Volcano Road @ across S:Volcano General Store 1 < < -· 0=nII) II) CQ Cooper Center Park & Ride I Cl) g Lot z G') !Highway 11 @ Glenwood Park (across Hirono Store) I· II 0 C. s: !Highway 11 @St.Theresa's I" I� § r.h11rl"'h < - 1� m �::I-Sl =r -· C" < 0 CD5� Bus Stop A Q)>-<(� ro·-.cE a>.._ Ea> roI- .cr/) Q) :::J Ecc Q) :::J E ro ro �� Oa, -0 N �� B .c ro �:::J Q) ro -c.. � (§)0 C)·-C Q) § :aQ) a.= � :::J :::J(/) <( cc ·c-=:�:::J Q) C a. Q) :::J :::J � 0<( (/) () C Hilo D -(/) ro .Q"5:f(U I � ··-·roC � ro ro....J :::c@--0 (/) �·-·wC '- � Q) 0 >·a. ·cro :::>�. E ro�ro � (§)u5 00=.c"§ 0 ro Cl) � .c • O>s :f F Effective April 3, 2022 Southbound to Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park G Kea'au H 1n0c.. (§)� "O;;�a:: et:: ro 0 0C .C ro rooC.. 0 :::J...-... > ro a>-0 -o ro Ii= o�o Kurtistown c_� ...0 Q) -.:!::: r/) Q) ·-.ct:: r/) :::J � r/) :::J (§) .0r/) ..... r/) ..... 0 >, ... ro o��.c � O> ...·-ro:::c c.. Fern Acres J (§) ..... "O..- ro 0 lu a:: � ·c.c ro 0>·-:::J :::c � Mo \ ..... ..... >, ro �.c .!2>:::c ID# 100 101 103 105 106 107 110 901 903 TBA 5:00AM 5:04AM 5:06AM 5:08AM 5:11AM 5:12AM 5:17AM 5:27AM 5:32AM 5:37 AM 7:40AM 7:44AM 7:48AM 7:51 AM 7:52AM 8:07 AM 8:12 AM 8:17 AM 1 �--� Monday through Friday only Everyday service --- = bus does not serve timepoint. To read the timetable, read from left to right to follow the course of the route and then read down for the times that the bus opi boldface type. Schedules are subject to change without notice. Times are approximate and may vary depending on traffic co Not all Hele-On bus stops are shown. Please flag the bus along its route at safe intersections where the bus can safely pull o "Bus Stop" sign. $15.00 entrance fee or a visitor pass required to get off the bus at Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park. Entrance fees are vaild f, Effective April 3, 2022 Northbound to Hilo Hawai'i Volcanoes National Volcano Mountain Park Village Glenwood View Fern Acres Kurtistown Kea'au 0 M N L K J I H G ... Q) -E <( (/) 0 "O "O � 0 CJ) Q) C: _. a:: � 0 Q) ·u;� 0 O ·c -= .!: � 5 � 0 _. (/) J: ©) � ;:: CJ) co (/) ©) :;-... ©) � C: 0 "3 0 a.. _(I) "O Q) ... Q) C: � ... >, co (!) co -o .,.;_c 0 "O co ©)o.-.. Q) a.. (!) .!:::CJ) 0 CJ) <( � CO O ,-... co Q) > 0 0 ... 0 c:: Q) _. � E·;:: c:: C: ... ©) J:@i ©)©) cu c:: co :-2 �-o Q) 0 0 co _. (/) ...... a.. O O � _. co J: C: ...... () E C: .2 Q) ...... (/)......C: .c co CJ) N � ...... 0 ...... (/) ............ C: a:: CO 0 () >, ... >, ;:: co co -::::, .!!! C: .2 >>, ->, 0 a.. -... co 0 co co co CO 0 -I C) .c a.. Q) ......0 (/) Q) ;:: �;:: l3 ;:: "O ;:: ti 0 ::::, C: 0 0 ... Q)Q) > (/) Q) a. > co ·-16 c -o e o 0 _. .c � .c ... .c co .c ·-co "O ::::, :.c: � C) ... C) Q) .Q> 0 C) t::"O Q) =... Q) -0 _. 0 0 ·-co ·-.c ·-::::, o�E .c ::::, .c () () 0 co CJ) () ....J J: a.. J: I-J: c:: J: � 0 � () Bus Stop ID# 809 918 TBA 919 920 TBA 921 924 110 6:15 AM 6:20AM 6:21 AM 6:27 AM 6:33AM 6:38AM 6:43AM 6:49AM 7:02AM 9:15 AM 9:20AM 9:21 AM 9:27 AM 9:33AM 9:38AM 9:43AM 9:49AM 10:02 AM ' one-way trip. Bus lo round trip fares ct to change. >change is given! General Discount* $2.00 $1.00 $15.00 $7.50 $60.00 $45.00 FREE FREE FREE FREE with valid school ID rsity, seniors age 60 showing age, persons inty of Hawai'i Mass nt Card and Medicare other passengers pay nthly Passes are , of Hawai'i Mass :'lau Bus Terminal, or check, credit card or 1ty of Hawai'i) & the tickets requested to Transit Agency, 25 s, questions or -On transit servicesof Hawai'i Mass18)961-8744, fax to:unty of Hawai'i Masstreet, Hilo, HI 967201waiicounty.gov. ·ransit Administrator Each of our routes has a unique name and number and the route destination is on the front and right side of the bus. The schedule shows the departure times of the bus as it travels along the route. Read the timetable from left to right. Time points are shown on the map and on the timetable. See the timetable to estimate the arrival time at your bus stop. Since safe driving is always a priority, traffic, weather and other conditions can change arrival times. Please plan accordingly. Prior to boarding a Hele-On bus, wait at a blue and white Hele-On Bus Stop, red and white bus stop or Kona Trolley sign and wait on the proper side of the roadway. In some cases, you may need to flag the bus (at a safe pullover location) due to no sign being available. Arrive at least five (5) minutes before the bus is due to arrive. •If you are unfamiliar with your stop, sit or standbehind the white line in the front of the bus andask the bus operator to notify you when yourstop is approaching. •Ask the bus operator if you are not sure if thebus goes to your desired bus stop. •Be mindful of changes in the schedule, overallconditions and weather. •No eating, drinking or smoking of any kind. •No boarding with surfboards or body boards. •Electronic devices may be played withearphones set a at low level and talking oncellular phones are to not be used on the bus. •Shoes and shirt are required to ride. •No rowdy behavior on the bus. •No spitting or expectorating on the bus. •No flammable, explosive, sharp or toxicmaterials. •No obstructing, fighting or interfering with thebus operator or bus operations. •Only five bags are allowed on the bus. Violators of these rules can result in a fine, suspension from riding the bus and/or imprisonment as defined in the Hawaii County Code 2-27-3 and/or Hawaii Revised Statutes. Take The Tripi 7 day a week service between Downtown Hilo @ Mo'oheau Bus Terminal and King's Landing in Hilo Telephone: (808) 961-87 44 TDD/TTY: 711 www.heleonbus.org Effective Sunday, October 3, 2021 Route 101: Keaukaha (Monday-Saturday) Effective October 3, 2021 Hele-On Bus Schedule -#101 Intra-Hilo Keaukaha Counter Clockwise Loop to Mo'oheau Bus Terminal Legend Hilo L N 0 p Q R A •Ei:iJ•t1011ntra•Hilo Koukaha :::, ., -mJ-�un�ay Servkt ;;; Cl. .c 0 .,Q) Ill £ 'i�.!!! ;;; (.) 121 l:55AM r:55AM l:55AM 122 7:00AM 8:00AM 9:00AM 123 7:01 AM 8:01 AM 9:01 AM E :::, C � Q) @� QJ � �1: Q) 0 -.::: 0 C ., .,C Q) -� 0 co J!! ' ., -� en 124 7:02 AM 8:02 AM 9:02 AM 125 126 7:03 AM 7:06AM 8:03 AM 8:06AM 9:03 AM 9:06AM <U i .!: <( E ., � .c Q) Q) t- E (I) ., :::, .c Ill a, :::i E ., .,��Om -0 N ::!E� 100 7:11 AM 8:11 AM 9:11 AM l:55AM 10:00AM 10:01AM 10:02AM 10:03AM 10:06AM 10:11AM 0:55AM 11:00AM 11:01 AM 11:02AM 11:03AM 11:06AM 11:11 AM 1:55 AM 12:00 PM 12:01 PM 12:02 PM 12:03 PM 12:06 PM 12:11 PM 2:55 PM 1 :00 PM I :55 PM 2:00 PM !:55 PM 3:00 PM 1:55 PM 4:00 PM 1:55 PM 5:00 PM i:55 PM 6:00 PM i:55 PM 7:00 PM 1:01 PM 1:02 PM 1:03 PM 1:06 PM 1:11 PM 2:01 PM 2:02 PM 2:03 PM 2:06 PM 2:11 PM 3:01 PM 3:02 PM 3:03 PM 3:06 PM 3:11 PM 4:01 PM 4:02 PM 4:03 PM 4:06 PM 4:11 PM 5:01 PM 5:02 PM 5:03 PM 5:06 PM 5:11 PM 6:01 PM 6:02 PM 6:03 PM 6:06 PM 6:11 PM 7:01 PM 7:02 PM 7:03 PM 7:06 PM 7:11 PM Route 101: Keaukaha (Sunday & Holidays) L M (§)-� Q) g ct -e c ro Q) .c "' 0 -� ro O'. ti ffi ch Q) ·c .s II'. ro u-"' m ffi ro Q) � -• n. -0 � -�� .iii "'Q) C: £ Q) W S:: ID 118 120 !Bus Stop ID# 51 AM 9:53 AM :51 AM 10:53AM ·51 AM 11:53AM :51 PM 12:53 PM 51 PM 1:53 PM 51 PM 2:53 PM 51 PM 3:53 PM 51 PM 4:53 PM 51 PM 5:53 PM 1en read down for otice. Times are ms. M (§)-� Q) g J: -e ro Q) .c 0 -� ro O'. ffi chC -� ro u -"' ro ffi ro "' -' 0.. � -6> M C: -� Q) W S:: ID 120 9:53 AM 10:53 AM 11:53AM 12:53 PM 1:53 PM 2:53 PM 3:53 PM 4:53 PM --- Counter Clockwise Loop to Mo'oheau Bus Terminal L -"' @iii Q) 0.. > .c <( u "'Q) Q) olD"' .c c-.!!! .EC en ��"' "'� (.) 121 9:55AM 10:55AM 11:55AM 12:55 PM 1:55 PM 2:55 PM 3:55 PM 4:55 PM --- Effective October 3, 2021 N � "'0.. ©) .c u "' Q) -0 Q) > II'. ID <( "' "' Q)-"'-"' o�� ���•-m ro C .S:: .C "'Q) Q) cij C C: �00 122 10:00AM 11:00AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM --- Hilo 0 "' :::, 0.. ©) Q) .g 'E > --Q) <( � (.) � a.. Q) o I� �I::2 .!!! :, u C "'"' Q) :::, «i > � <( <( 123 10:01 AM 11:01 AM 12:01 PM 1:01 PM 2:01 PM 3:01 PM 4:01 PM 5:01 PM --- :::, "' p :::, C � Q) ©)� Q) 52 �c Q) 0 0 -= «l C C «l "'Q) ·-u co .!!! ' � en 124 Q 125 10:02 AM 10:03 AM 11:02 AM 11:03 AM 12:02 PM 12:03 PM 1:02PM 1:03PM 2:02 PM 2:03 PM 3:02 PM 3:03 PM 4:02 PM 4:03 PM 5:02 PM 5:03 PM R "O C "' ©)� Q) 0.. >-·;:: C: □ .!!! en C «l C "'-"' Q) � _g "Em = m ID ::::i C) 126 10:06AM 11:06AM 12:06 PM 1:06 PM 2:06 PM 3:06 PM 4:06 PM 5:06 PM --- [!Jr,..� or�tt,b 0Medc.lllfdty o,__.,, 0"""' oic.,o.- A - <( � "'·- .c E ., � E �� en Q) :::, E ID Q) :::, E "' Q)"' .c �_o a, ON ::;; � 100 10:11 AM 11:11AM 12:11 PM 1:11 PM 2:11 PM 3:11 PM 4:11 PM 5:11 PM --- Not all Hele-On bus stops are shown. Please flag the bus along its route at safe intersections where the bus can safely pull over or board at a bus shelter, a Kana Trolley Stop sign, a Hele-On Bus Stop or a red/white or blue Bus Stop sign. - - -means timepoint is not served. AM times are shown in lightface type. PM times are in boldface type. �� Please recycle. Share� ._ this bus schedule withW"' J;/1 someone else if you do'WI .,.. not need it. Bus Stop ID A B � (U .c (U �·- .c ::J Q) E a, (U -a_ C ._ E Q) Q) (U @ (.) C)I- .c1/) Q)·-C Q) § :a ::, ECD a,Q) a.:= ::, E � ::J ::JCl) <( CD (U (U ·-->, � � c-- 0 0) -::J Q) C a. Q) ::J-0 N Q) ::J � 0 :?C")> .._.,<( <( (/) (.) 100 101 7:15 AM 7:20AM 8:15 AM 8:20AM 9:15 AM 9:20AM 10:15 AM 10:20 AM 11:15AM 11:20 AM 12:15 PM 12:20 PM 1:15 PM 1:20 PM 2:15 PM 2:20 PM 3:15 PM 3:20 PM 4:15 PM 4:20 PM 5:15 PM 5:20 PM 6:15 PM 6:20 PM C -Q) Q) @-=a� Q) (/) := Q) ::,cu:::c--C C (U E Q) � .c O (.) <(�� C)C (U 1/) 1/) ·-Q) 1/) 1/) a.::Jooa.(U .... t 0 :: o<(.c � <( -(/) 103 7:23 AM 8:23 AM 9:23 AM 10:23 AM 11:23 AM 12:23 PM 1:23 PM 2:23 PM 3:23 PM 4:23 PM 5:23 PM 6:23 PM D (U I "5 ==(U (U.::t:. � ·-(Uffi :::c....J ..... @�-u5 "§·-Q)C >(U ·-- C .Q ::> Q. I 0 (U -:=� (/) :::c 105 7:27 AM 8:27 AM 9:27 AM 10:27 AM 11:27 AM 12:27 PM 1:27 PM 2:27 PM 3:27 PM 4:27 PM 5:27 PM 6:27 PM E F (U Q).::t:. ·n;(U � Q) � (U C):::c Q) @o@_u u5 0 Q)>, 0 Q):!: :=-£ � C (/) ::J� (/) = E� .c .:§ E. C) (U 0 s:i: � (.) 106 107 7:28AM 7:29 AM 8:28AM 8:29 AM 9:28AM 9:29 AM 10:28 AM 10:29 AM 11:28 AM 11:29 AM 12:28 PM 12:29 PM 1:28 PM 1:29 PM 2:28 PM 2:29 PM 3:28 PM 3:29 PM 4:28 PM 4:29 PM 5:28 PM 5:29 PM 6:28 PM 6:29 PM H -1/) (U w @_Q) Q)::J �c-Q) (/)> (U<( Q)(U a.Q) 0 ::J (U (U .c := (U �� 158 6:33AM 7:33AM 8:33AM 9:33AM 10:33 AM 11:33 AM 12:33 PM 1:33 PM 2:33 PM 3:33 PM 4:33 PM 5:33 PM 6:33 PM (0 Q) Q) -a. 0 0 (0 g .J:: ·-(0 :::i:::: :::i:::: ro �� (§)� - 0 O> en -0 .5 Q) C: Cl) -·-:::, 0 :::,C::: 0 g I I ·-..., I.... :::i:::: en en 159 6:34AM 7:34AM 8:34AM 9:34AM 10:34 AM 11:34AM 12:34 PM 1:34 PM 2:34 PM 3:34 PM 4:34 PM 5:34 PM 6:34 PM This route operates Monday-Saturday only. There is no Sunday or holiday service. ---= bus does not serve timepoint. J ·n;(U a.. @ Q) ::JC Q) > <( (U Q) -::J Q)(U Q)-....·--� (/) 160 6:35 AM 7:35 AM 8:35 AM 9:35 AM 10:35 AM 11:35 AM 12:35 PM 1:35 PM 2:35 PM 3:35 PM 4:35 PM 5:35 PM 6:35 PM K � Q).E 1/) i .Q g·-(.)@:::C .....-•oQ) -(9Q) Q) � � Q) (/) --·-(/) .9-(U (U .2 :f: "5 C (U (U ::J:::c ....J:? 162 6:36AM 7:36AM 8:36AM 9:36AM 10:36 AM 11:36 AM 12:36 PM 1:36 PM 2:36 PM 3:36 PM 4:36 PM 5:36 PM 6:36 PM To read the timetable, read from left to right to follow the course of the route and then read down for the times that the bus< shown in lightface type. PM times are in boldface type. Schedules are subject to change without notice. Times are approx depending on traffic conditions, weather and other conditions. Not all Hele-On bus stops are shown. Please flag the bus along its route at safe intersections where the bus can safely pull Hele-On Bus Stop sign or a red/white or blue "Bus Stop" sign. Appendix C -Analysis Report Existing Conditions HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2022 AM -Base Conditions 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/15/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 470 290 57 720 Future Volume (veh/h) 88 470 290 57 720 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1826 1841 1826 1856 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 528 326 62 783 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 5 4 5 3 Cap, veh/h 371 1501 674 386 1492 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3469 1558 1739 3526 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 528 326 62 783 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1735 1558 1739 1763 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 7.8 11.4 1.5 12.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 7.8 11.4 1.5 12.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 371 1501 674 386 1492 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.35 0.48 0.16 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 408 1501 674 417 1492 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 12.1 14.5 15.5 11.4 16.3 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.6 2.5 0.2 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 2.9 4.3 0.5 4.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.5 15.1 18.0 11.6 17.6 LnGre LOS B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 953 858 Approach Delay, s/veh 15.8 17.1 Approach LOS B B imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 38.0 7.2 22.4 9.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 33.0 5.0 47.0 6.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.5 13.4 3.0 7.5 4.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.4 HCM 6th LOS B 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 12 180 61 68 12 180 61 68 0 0 0 0 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1841 1856 1841 13 200 68 76 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 4 3 4 666 331 182 204 0.42 0.10 0.23 0.23 1575 1753 800 894 13 200 0 144 1575 1753 0 1693 0.4 7.0 0.0 5.5 0.4 7.0 0.0 5.5 1.00 1.00 0.53 666 331 0 386 0.02 0.60 0.00 0.37 666 331 0 1044 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 12.8 22.9 0.0 24.9 0.1 3.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 2.1 12.8 26.0 0.0 25.5 B C A C 344 25.8 C 6 7 8 37.3 13.0 16.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 32.0 8.0 44.0 14.6 9.0 10.2 5.0 0.0 1.3 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 26 70 108 26 70 108 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1885 1870 28 75 116 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 2 340 101 157 0.03 0.15 0.15 1810 666 1031 28 0 191 1810 0 1697 1.0 0.0 8.2 1.0 0.0 8.2 1.00 0.61 340 0 258 0.08 0.00 0.74 405 0 979 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 25.9 0.0 30.9 0.1 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.6 26.0 0.0 35.0 C A D 219 33.9 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC AM -Route 11 and Piilani with Refuge Lane Modeled 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street 05/31/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL EBR Lane Configurations V Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 52 Future Vol, veh/h 10 52 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 MvmtFlow 12 60 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1237 389 Stage 1 747 Stage 2 490 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.96 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 202 512 Stage 1 358 Stage 2 568 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 101 511 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 101 Stage 1 180 Stage 2 567 roach EB HCM Control Delay, s 20.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL Capacity (veh/h) 494 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.496 HCM Control Delay s) 19.3 HCM Lane LOS C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT SBT SBR � tt tttt 201 0 659 52 201 0 659 52 2 0 0 2 Free Free Free Free -None -None 425 0 0 0 0 82 82 92 92 4 0 9 23 245 0 716 57 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 775 0 0 5.38 3.14 495 494 NB SB 19.3 0 NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR-309 -0.233-20.2 C 0.9 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Future Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 79 79 79 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 11 17 0 9 8 7 0 MvmtFlow 23 8 8 39 20 97 9 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 854 839 379 802 810 287 394 Stage 1 491 491 -304 304 Stage 2 363 348 -498 506 Critical Hdwy 7.21 6.67 6.2 7.19 6.58 6.27 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Follow-up Hdwy 3.599 4.153 3.3 3.581 4.072 3.363 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 269 286 672 294 307 740 1176 Stage 1 543 524 -691 652 Stage 2 638 608 -541 530 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 209 267 671 269 286 739 1175 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 209 267 -269 286 Stage 1 538 493 -685 646 Stage 2 531 603 -494 498 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 21.6 17.2 0.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1175 -257 450 1218 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 -0.155 0.349 0.046 HCM Control Delay s) 8.1 0 -21.6 17.2 8.1 HCM Lane LOS A A C C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.5 1.5 0.1 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 205 76 49 205 76 49 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 85 85 87 4 1 4 241 89 56 Ma'or2 0 0 330 -4.14 -2.236 -1218 -1218 SB SBT SBR 0 A 2022 AM -Base Conditions 04/15/2022 SBT SBR * 315 27 315 27 0 1 Free Free -None 0 0 87 87 4 0 362 31 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 89 268 32 25 397 Future Volume (veh/h) 89 268 32 25 397 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 298 36 29 467 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 Cap, veh/h 287 577 70 394 620 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1624 196 1753 1742 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 0 334 29 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1820 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.1 0.0 13.0 0.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.1 0.0 13.0 0.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 287 0 647 394 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.52 0.07 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 0 647 394 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 19.3 0.0 22.9 16.8 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 5.8 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.6 0.0 25.8 17.2 0.0 LnGre LOS C A C B A Approach Vol, veh/h 433 525 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.1 32.5 Approach LOS C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.0 17.4 2.9 15.0 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.7 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.2 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 25 72 25 72 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1841 1811 29 87 0.85 0.83 4 6 38 346 0.36 0.06 108 1725 496 87 1851 1725 21.2 3.0 21.2 3.0 0.06 1.00 658 346 0.75 0.25 658 346 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.5 20.1 7.8 1.7 0.0 0.0 10.2 1.3 33.4 21.8 C C 6 7 33.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 28.0 5.0 15.1 5.1 1.4 0.0 2022 AM -Base Conditions t � NBT NBR � 244 49 244 49 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1826 1841 294 59 0.83 0.83 5 4 459 92 0.31 0.31 1476 296 0 353 0 1773 0.0 15.4 0.0 15.4 0.17 0 551 0.00 0.64 0 551 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 26.7 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 32.3 A C 440 30.2 C 8 37.0 5.0 32.0 23.2 2.0 04/15/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 75 204 69 75 204 69 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 1796 86 234 79 0.87 0.87 0.87 8 2 7 311 416 140 0.06 0.31 0.31 1697 1338 452 86 0 313 1697 0 1789 3.0 0.0 13.1 3.0 0.0 13.1 1.00 0.25 311 0 557 0.28 0.00 0.56 311 0 557 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 20.5 0.0 25.9 2.2 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 6.0 22.7 0.0 30.0 C A C 399 28.4 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 396 5 5 527 7 Future Vol, veh/h 17 396 5 5 527 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 MvmtFlow 19 450 6 6 620 8 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 630 0 0 459 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 962 -1113 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 960 -1110 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 242 960 -1110 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.133 0.02 -0.005 HCM Control Delay s) 22.1 8.8 0 -8.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 8 1 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 15 2 15 Minor1 1152 1136 456 494 494 - 658 642 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.3 176 204 609 561 550 - 457 472 - 154 196 607 154 196 - 544 534 - 413 467 - NB 22.1 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -344 -0.151 0 -17.3 A C 0.5 SBL 6 6 0 Stop 73 0 8 Minor2 1138 638 500 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 180 468 557 169 169 454 527 SB 17.3 C 2022 AM -Base Conditions 04/15/2022 SBT SBR * 3 29 3 29 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 73 73 0 0 4 40 1135 626 638 497 6.5 6.2 5.5 5.5 4 3.3 204 488 474 548 196 487 196 469 532 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2022 PM -Base Conditions 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/15/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 575 389 64 605 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 575 389 64 605 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 102 612 414 70 658 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 376 1394 612 322 1382 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.39 0.39 0.05 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1572 1810 3610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 612 414 70 658 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1791 1572 1810 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 10.3 17.9 1.9 11.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 10.3 17.9 1.9 11.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 376 1394 612 322 1382 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.44 0.68 0.22 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 452 1394 612 367 1382 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 14.7 18.5 20.8 14.5 19.2 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 1.0 5.9 0.3 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 4.2 7.3 0.7 4.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.1 19.5 26.7 14.8 20.3 LnGre LOS B B C B C Approach Vol, veh/h 1128 738 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.8 19.7 Approach LOS C B imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 37.0 7.2 29.0 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.9 19.9 3.0 6.1 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.7 0.1 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.2 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 9 265 54 45 9 265 54 45 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1870 1870 10 305 62 52 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0 0 2 2 615 428 274 230 0.38 0.16 0.29 0.29 1606 1810 939 788 10 305 0 114 1606 1810 0 1727 0.3 10.9 0.0 4.1 0.3 10.9 0.0 4.1 1.00 1.00 0.46 615 428 0 504 0.02 0.71 0.00 0.23 615 469 0 987 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 15.8 22.4 0.0 22.1 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.9 0.0 1.6 15.8 27.0 0.0 22.3 B C A C 419 25.7 C 6 7 8 36.5 18.1 18.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 30.0 15.0 37.0 13.3 12.9 11.6 4.0 0.2 1.3 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 21 70 97 21 70 97 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1885 26 88 121 0.80 0.80 0.80 0 0 1 343 115 158 0.03 0.16 0.16 1810 723 994 26 0 209 1810 0 1717 1.0 0.0 9.6 1.0 0.0 9.6 1.00 0.58 343 0 273 0.08 0.00 0.76 404 0 773 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 27.6 0.0 33.1 0.1 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.3 27.7 0.0 37.5 C A D 235 36.4 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC Route 11 and Piilani with Refuge Lane Modeled 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street 05/31/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Movement EBL EBR Lane Configurations V Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 109 Future Vol, veh/h 8 109 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 MvmtFlow 10 135 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1273 507 Stage 1 993 Stage 2 280 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.93 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 193 435 Stage 1 253 Stage 2 722 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 122 435 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 122 Stage 1 160 Stage 2 722 roach EB HCM Control Delay, s 20.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL Capacity (veh/h) 380 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.369 HCM Control Delay s) 19.9 HCM Lane LOS C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.7 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT SBT SBR � tt tttt 129 0 874 39 129 0 874 39 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free -None -None 425 0 0 0 0 92 92 90 90 4 3 3 0 140 0 971 43 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 1014 0 0 5.38 3.14 380 380 NB SB 19.9 0 NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR-370-0.39-20.8 C 1.8 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Future Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 85 85 85 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 MvmtFlow 23 12 17 46 20 91 6 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 955 933 406 911 914 318 422 Stage 1 570 570 -328 328 Stage 2 385 363 -583 586 Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.56 6.2 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.054 3.3 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 240 268 649 257 269 727 1148 Stage 1 510 509 -689 640 Stage 2 642 628 -502 491 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 182 242 648 224 243 726 1146 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 182 242 -224 243 Stage 1 505 463 -684 636 Stage 2 539 624 -435 447 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 22.6 20.9 0.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1146 -256 380 1219 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 -0.203 0.412 0.067 HCM Control Delay s) 8.2 0 -22.6 20.9 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A C C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.7 2 0.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 263 67 76 263 67 76 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 94 94 93 1 0 0 280 71 82 Ma'or2 0 0 351 -4.1 2.2 -1219 -1219 SB 1.3 SBT SBR 0 A 2022 PM -Base Conditions 04/15/2022 SBT SBR * 361 30 361 30 0 2 Free Free -None 0 0 93 93 1 0 388 32 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 106 385 61 95 343 Future Volume (veh/h) 106 385 61 95 343 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 112 405 64 100 361 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 Cap, veh/h 362 560 89 303 577 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1575 249 1795 1675 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 112 0 469 100 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1824 1795 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 20.1 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 20.1 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 362 0 649 303 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.00 0.72 0.33 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 362 0 649 303 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 18.3 0.0 25.2 19.4 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.0 6.9 2.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 0.0 9.4 1.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.5 0.0 32.0 22.3 0.0 LnGre LOS C A C C A Approach Vol, veh/h 581 502 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.8 27.8 Approach LOS C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.3 13.6 5.2 22.1 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.0 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.0 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 39 46 39 46 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 1900 41 50 0.95 0.92 0 0 66 321 0.34 0.06 190 1810 402 50 1865 1810 16.2 1.6 16.2 1.6 0.10 1.00 642 321 0.63 0.16 642 321 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24.7 20.0 4.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.7 29.2 21.0 C C 6 7 33.0 11.0 5.0 5.0 28.0 6.0 17.7 5.5 1.6 0.0 2022 PM -Base Conditions t � NBT NBR � 214 48 214 48 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1870 1841 233 52 0.92 0.92 2 4 460 103 0.31 0.31 1479 330 0 285 0 1810 0.0 11.6 0.0 11.6 0.18 0 563 0.00 0.51 0 563 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 25.3 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 28.6 A C 335 27.5 C 8 36.0 5.0 31.0 18.2 1.9 04/15/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 93 258 90 93 258 90 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 1900 98 272 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0 0 380 418 146 0.06 0.31 0.31 1795 1344 469 98 0 367 1795 0 1814 3.3 0.0 15.7 3.3 0.0 15.7 1.00 0.26 380 0 564 0.26 0.00 0.65 380 0 564 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 19.9 0.0 26.8 1.6 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 7.4 21.5 0.0 32.5 C A C 465 30.2 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 538 16 4 478 9 Future Vol, veh/h 18 538 16 4 478 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 6 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 19 560 17 4 493 9 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 504 0 0 578 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 1071 -1006 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1069 -1005 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 354 1069 -1005 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 0.018 -0.004 HCM Control Delay s) 16 8.4 0 8.6 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 1 4 14 1 4 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 68 68 68 0 0 7 1 6 21 Minor1 1144 1120 570 608 608 - 536 512 - 7.1 6.5 6.27 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.363 179 208 512 486 489 - 532 540 - 155 201 512 155 201 - 473 476 - 473 536 - NB 16 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -520 -0.115 0 -12.8 A B 0.4 SBL 0 0 0 Stop 72 0 0 Minor2 1128 508 620 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 183 551 479 167 167 536 442 SB 12.8 B 2022 PM -Base Conditions 04/15/2022 SBT SBR * 2 41 2 41 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 72 72 0 5 3 57 1124 500 508 616 6.5 6.25 5.5 5.5 4 3.345 207 565 542 485 200 564 200 538 472 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Appendix D -Analysis Report Future Without Project Conditions HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM -Without Project 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/19/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 500 309 57 767 Future Volume (veh/h) 88 500 309 57 767 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1826 1841 1826 1856 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 562 347 62 834 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 5 4 5 3 Cap, veh/h 348 1495 671 366 1487 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3469 1558 1739 3526 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 562 347 62 834 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1735 1558 1739 1763 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 8.6 12.8 1.5 14.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 8.6 12.8 1.5 14.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 348 1495 671 366 1487 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.38 0.52 0.17 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 361 1495 671 395 1487 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 12.8 15.1 16.3 11.9 17.1 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.7 2.8 0.2 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.3 4.9 0.6 5.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.2 15.8 19.1 12.1 18.7 LnGre LOS B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 1008 909 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.7 18.1 Approach LOS B B imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 38.7 7.3 23.5 9.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 33.0 5.0 47.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.5 14.8 3.0 7.5 4.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.2 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 12 193 61 68 12 193 61 68 0 0 0 0 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1841 1856 1841 13 214 68 76 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 4 3 4 664 345 190 212 0.42 0.12 0.24 0.24 1575 1753 800 894 13 214 0 144 1575 1753 0 1693 0.4 7.7 0.0 5.5 0.4 7.7 0.0 5.5 1.00 1.00 0.53 664 345 0 401 0.02 0.62 0.00 0.36 664 345 0 1017 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 13.2 23.2 0.0 24.9 0.1 3.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.3 0.0 2.2 13.2 26.6 0.0 25.4 B C A C 358 26.1 C 6 7 8 38.0 14.0 16.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 33.0 9.0 43.0 16.0 9.7 10.4 5.3 0.0 1.3 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 26 70 108 26 70 108 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1885 1870 28 75 116 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 2 335 101 156 0.03 0.15 0.15 1810 666 1031 28 0 191 1810 0 1697 1.0 0.0 8.4 1.0 0.0 8.4 1.00 0.61 335 0 256 0.08 0.00 0.74 398 0 933 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 26.7 0.0 31.8 0.1 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.7 26.8 0.0 36.0 C A D 219 34.9 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: ./Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations V " tt ttft Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 52 201 0 702 52 Future Vol, veh/h 10 52 201 0 702 52 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 -425 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 82 82 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 4 0 9 23 MvmtFlow 12 60 245 0 763 57 Ma·or/Minor Minor2 Ma·or1 Ma·or2 Conflicting Flow All 1284 412 822 0 0 Stage 1 794 Stage 2 490 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.22 5.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.96 3.14 Pot Car:t1 Maneuver 190 495 470 Stage 1 335 Stage 2 568 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 90 494 469 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 90 Stage 1 160 Stage 2 567 roach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 21.7 20.8 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 469 -287 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.523 -0.251 HCM Control Delay s) 20.8 -21.7 HCM Lane LOS C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3 1 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2027 AM -Without Project 05/31/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Future Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 79 79 79 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 11 17 0 9 8 7 0 MvmtFlow 23 8 8 39 20 97 9 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 891 876 401 839 847 302 416 Stage 1 513 513 -319 319 Stage 2 378 363 -520 528 Critical Hdwy 7.21 6.67 6.2 7.19 6.58 6.27 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Follow-up Hdwy 3.599 4.153 3.3 3.581 4.072 3.363 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 254 272 653 277 292 726 1154 Stage 1 528 512 -678 642 Stage 2 626 599 -527 518 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 196 253 652 252 271 725 1153 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 196 253 -252 271 Stage 1 522 480 -671 636 Stage 2 519 593 -480 486 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 22.8 18.1 0.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1153 -242 430 1203 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 -0.164 0.365 0.047 HCM Control Delay s) 8.1 0 -22.8 18.1 8.1 HCM Lane LOS A A C C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.6 1.6 0.1 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 218 76 49 218 76 49 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 85 85 87 4 1 4 256 89 56 Ma'or2 0 0 345 -4.14 -2.236 -1203 -1203 SB SBT SBR 0 A 2027 AM - Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 334 27 334 27 0 1 Free Free -None 0 0 87 87 4 0 384 31 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 89 294 32 25 423 Future Volume (veh/h) 89 294 32 25 423 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 327 36 29 498 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 Cap, veh/h 252 566 62 359 603 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1642 181 1753 1750 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 0 363 29 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1823 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.2 0.0 14.7 0.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2 0.0 14.7 0.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 252 0 628 359 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.58 0.08 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 252 0 628 359 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 20.6 0.0 24.1 17.7 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 4.5 0.0 3.9 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 0.0 6.7 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.1 0.0 28.0 18.1 0.0 LnGre LOS C A C B A Approach Vol, veh/h 462 556 Approach Delay, s/veh 27.4 37.6 Approach LOS C D imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 34.0 10.0 36.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 29.0 5.0 31.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.0 18.2 2.9 16.7 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.8 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.1 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 25 72 25 72 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1841 1811 29 87 0.85 0.83 4 6 35 344 0.34 0.06 102 1725 527 87 1852 1725 23.5 3.0 23.5 3.0 0.06 1.00 638 344 0.83 0.25 638 344 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 27.0 19.5 11.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 11.8 1.3 38.7 21.3 D C 6 7 34.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 29.0 5.0 16.0 5.2 1.6 0.0 2027 AM -Without Project t � NBT NBR � 260 49 260 49 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1826 1841 313 59 0.83 0.83 5 4 481 91 0.32 0.32 1494 282 0 372 0 1775 0.0 16.2 0.0 16.2 0.16 0 572 0.00 0.65 0 572 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 26.2 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 31.8 A C 459 29.8 C 8 36.0 5.0 31.0 25.5 1.6 04/19/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 75 223 69 75 223 69 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 1796 86 256 79 0.87 0.87 0.87 8 2 7 311 442 136 0.06 0.32 0.32 1697 1371 423 86 0 335 1697 0 1794 3.0 0.0 14.0 3.0 0.0 14.0 1.00 0.24 311 0 578 0.28 0.00 0.58 311 0 578 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 19.9 0.0 25.4 2.2 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 6.4 22.1 0.0 29.6 C A C 421 28.1 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 422 5 5 553 7 Future Vol, veh/h 17 422 5 5 553 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 MvmtFlow 19 480 6 6 651 8 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 661 0 0 489 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 937 -1085 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 935 -1082 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 221 935 -1082 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.145 0.021 -0.005 HCM Control Delay s) 24 8.9 0 8.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 8 1 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 15 2 15 Minor1 1213 1197 486 524 524 - 689 673 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.3 160 187 585 540 533 - 439 457 - 139 179 583 139 179 - 523 516 - 394 452 - NB 24 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -323 -0.161 0 -18.3 A C 0.6 SBL 6 6 0 Stop 73 0 8 Minor2 1199 669 530 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 164 450 536 154 154 437 506 SB 18.3 C 2027 AM -Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 3 29 3 29 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 73 73 0 0 4 40 1196 657 669 527 6.5 6.2 5.5 5.5 4 3.3 188 468 459 532 180 467 180 454 516 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM -Without Project 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/19/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 612 414 64 644 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 612 414 64 644 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 102 651 440 70 700 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 357 1384 608 306 1373 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.39 0.39 0.05 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1572 1810 3610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 651 440 70 700 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1791 1572 1810 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 11.3 19.7 1.9 12.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 11.3 19.7 1.9 12.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 357 1384 608 306 1373 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.47 0.72 0.23 0.51 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 433 1384 608 349 1373 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 15.1 19.0 21.6 14.9 19.7 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 1.1 7.3 0.4 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 4.6 8.2 0.8 5.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.5 20.2 29.0 15.2 21.1 LnGre LOS B C C B C Approach Vol, veh/h 1193 780 Approach Delay, s/veh 23.0 20.5 Approach LOS C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 37.0 7.3 29.5 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.9 21.7 3.0 6.1 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.0 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 9 276 54 45 9 276 54 45 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1870 1870 10 317 62 52 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0 0 2 2 611 435 278 233 0.38 0.16 0.30 0.30 1606 1810 939 788 10 317 0 114 1606 1810 0 1727 0.3 11.5 0.0 4.1 0.3 11.5 0.0 4.1 1.00 1.00 0.46 611 435 0 512 0.02 0.73 0.00 0.22 611 465 0 980 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 16.0 22.5 0.0 21.9 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.2 0.0 1.6 16.0 27.8 0.0 22.2 B C A C 431 26.3 C 6 7 8 36.5 18.6 18.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 30.0 15.0 37.0 14.3 13.5 11.7 4.2 0.2 1.3 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 21 70 97 21 70 97 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1885 26 88 121 0.80 0.80 0.80 0 0 1 342 115 158 0.03 0.16 0.16 1810 723 994 26 0 209 1810 0 1717 1.0 0.0 9.7 1.0 0.0 9.7 1.00 0.58 342 0 273 0.08 0.00 0.77 402 0 767 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 27.8 0.0 33.3 0.1 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.3 27.9 0.0 37.8 C A D 235 36.7 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¥ " ++ ttftTraffic Vol, veh/h 8 109 129 0 931 39 Future Vol, veh/h 8 109 129 0 931 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 -425 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 92 92 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 4 3 3 0 MvmtFlow 10 135 140 0 1034 43 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 1336 539 1077 0 0 Stage 1 1056 Stage 2 280 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.16 5.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.93 3.14 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 177 415 354 Stage 1 232 Stage 2 722 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 107 415 354 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 107 Stage 1 140 Stage 2 722 roach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.6 21.7 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 354 -347 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.396 -0.416 HCM Control Delay s) 21.7 -22.6 HCM Lane LOS C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2027 PM -Without Project 05/31/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Future Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 85 85 85 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 MvmtFlow 23 12 17 46 20 91 6 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 993 971 433 949 952 329 449 Stage 1 597 597 -339 339 Stage 2 396 374 -610 613 Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.56 6.2 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.054 3.3 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 226 255 627 242 255 717 1122 Stage 1 493 495 -680 633 Stage 2 633 621 -485 477 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 170 230 626 210 230 716 1120 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 170 230 -210 230 Stage 1 489 449 -675 629 Stage 2 531 617 -418 433 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 24 22.3 0.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1120 -241 362 1208 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 -0.216 0.432 0.068 HCM Control Delay s) 8.2 0 24 22.3 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A C C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.8 2.1 0.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 274 67 76 274 67 76 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 94 94 93 1 0 0 291 71 82 Ma'or2 0 0 362 -4.1 2.2 -1208 -1208 SB 1.3 SBT SBR 0 A 2027 PM -Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 386 30 386 30 0 2 Free Free -None 0 0 93 93 1 0 415 32 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 106 420 61 95 365 Future Volume (veh/h) 106 420 61 95 365 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 112 442 64 100 384 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 Cap, veh/h 312 532 77 250 562 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1596 231 1795 1687 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 112 0 506 100 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1828 1795 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 23.0 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 23.0 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 312 0 609 250 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.00 0.83 0.40 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 312 0 609 250 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 19.9 0.0 27.7 21.1 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 12.5 4.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 11.6 1.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.1 0.0 40.1 25.8 0.0 LnGre LOS C A D C A Approach Vol, veh/h 618 525 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.0 30.7 Approach LOS D C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 35.0 10.0 35.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 30.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.2 13.9 5.2 25.0 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.4 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.3 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 39 46 39 46 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 1900 41 50 0.95 0.92 0 0 60 331 0.33 0.06 180 1810 425 50 1867 1810 17.7 1.6 17.7 1.6 0.10 1.00 622 331 0.68 0.15 622 331 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.9 18.9 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.7 31.9 19.8 C B 6 7 35.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 18.5 5.7 1.8 0.0 2027 PM -Without Project t � NBT NBR � 228 48 228 48 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1870 1841 248 52 0.92 0.92 2 4 499 105 0.33 0.33 1498 314 0 300 0 1813 0.0 11.9 0.0 11.9 0.17 0 604 0.00 0.50 0 604 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 24.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 26.9 A C 350 25.9 C 8 35.0 5.0 30.0 19.7 1.8 04/19/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 93 283 90 93 283 90 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 1900 98 298 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0 0 398 460 147 0.06 0.33 0.33 1795 1380 440 98 0 393 1795 0 1819 3.2 0.0 16.5 3.2 0.0 16.5 1.00 0.24 398 0 606 0.25 0.00 0.65 398 0 606 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 18.6 0.0 25.5 1.5 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 7.7 20.1 0.0 30.8 C A C 491 28.7 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 573 16 4 500 9 Future Vol, veh/h 18 573 16 4 500 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 6 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 19 597 17 4 515 9 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 526 0 0 615 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 1051 -974 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1049 -973 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 331 1049 -973 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 0.018 -0.004 HCM Control Delay s) 16.9 8.5 0 -8.7 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 1 4 14 1 4 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 68 68 68 0 0 7 1 6 21 Minor1 1203 1179 607 645 645 - 558 534 - 7.1 6.5 6.27 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.363 163 192 487 464 471 - 518 528 - 141 185 487 141 185 - 451 457 - 459 524 - NB 16.9 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -502 -0.119 0 -13.1 A B 0.4 SBL 0 0 0 Stop 72 0 0 Minor2 1187 530 657 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 167 536 457 152 152 520 420 SB 13.1 B 2027 PM -Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 2 41 2 41 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 72 72 0 5 3 57 1183 522 530 653 6.5 6.25 5.5 5.5 4 3.345 191 549 530 467 184 548 184 526 453 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2032 AM -Without Project 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/19/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 533 329 57 817 Future Volume (veh/h) 88 533 329 57 817 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1826 1841 1826 1856 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 599 370 62 888 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 5 4 5 3 Cap, veh/h 331 1495 671 351 1487 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3469 1558 1739 3526 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 599 370 62 888 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1735 1558 1739 1763 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 9.3 13.9 1.5 15.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 9.3 13.9 1.5 15.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 331 1495 671 351 1487 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.40 0.55 0.18 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 344 1495 671 402 1487 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 13.0 15.3 16.6 12.0 17.5 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.8 3.2 0.2 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.5 5.3 0.6 6.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.6 16.1 19.9 12.2 19.3 LnGre LOS B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 1068 963 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.2 18.7 Approach LOS B B imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 38.7 7.3 23.5 9.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.5 15.9 3.0 7.5 4.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.6 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 12 207 61 68 12 207 61 68 0 0 0 0 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1841 1856 1841 13 230 68 76 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 4 3 4 664 345 190 212 0.42 0.12 0.24 0.24 1575 1753 800 894 13 230 0 144 1575 1753 0 1693 0.4 8.4 0.0 5.5 0.4 8.4 0.0 5.5 1.00 1.00 0.53 664 345 0 401 0.02 0.67 0.00 0.36 664 345 0 1017 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 13.2 23.5 0.0 24.9 0.1 4.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.7 0.0 2.2 13.2 28.3 0.0 25.4 B C A C 374 27.2 C 6 7 8 38.0 14.0 16.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 33.0 9.0 43.0 17.2 10.4 10.4 5.5 0.0 1.3 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 26 70 108 26 70 108 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1885 1870 28 75 116 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 2 335 101 156 0.03 0.15 0.15 1810 666 1031 28 0 191 1810 0 1697 1.0 0.0 8.4 1.0 0.0 8.4 1.00 0.61 335 0 256 0.08 0.00 0.74 398 0 933 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 26.7 0.0 31.8 0.1 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.7 26.8 0.0 36.0 C A D 219 34.9 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¥ " ++ ttftTraffic Vol, veh/h 10 52 201 0 748 52 Future Vol, veh/h 10 52 201 0 748 52 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 -425 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 82 82 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 4 0 9 23 MvmtFlow 12 60 245 0 813 57 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 1334 437 872 0 0 Stage 1 844 Stage 2 490 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.22 5.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.96 3.14 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 178 477 445 Stage 1 312 Stage 2 568 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 79 476 444 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 79 Stage 1 139 Stage 2 567 roach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 23.8 22.7 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 444 -263 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.552 -0.274 HCM Control Delay s) 22.6 -23.8 HCM Lane LOS C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.3 1.1 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2032 AM -Without Project 05/31/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Future Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 79 79 79 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 11 17 0 9 8 7 0 MvmtFlow 23 8 8 39 20 97 9 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 931 916 424 879 887 319 439 Stage 1 536 536 -336 336 Stage 2 395 380 -543 551 Critical Hdwy 7.21 6.67 6.2 7.19 6.58 6.27 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Follow-up Hdwy 3.599 4.153 3.3 3.581 4.072 3.363 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 238 257 634 261 277 710 1132 Stage 1 513 500 -664 631 Stage 2 613 588 -511 506 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 182 238 633 237 257 709 1131 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 182 238 -237 257 Stage 1 507 468 -657 625 Stage 2 506 582 -464 474 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 24.3 19.1 0.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1131 -226 411 1186 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 -0.176 0.382 0.047 HCM Control Delay s) 8.2 0 -24.3 19.1 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A C C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.6 1.8 0.1 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 232 76 49 232 76 49 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 85 85 87 4 1 4 273 89 56 Ma'or2 0 0 362 -4.14 -2.236 -1186 -1186 SB 0.9 SBT SBR 0 A 2032 AM - Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 354 27 354 27 0 1 Free Free -None 0 0 87 87 4 0 407 31 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 89 321 32 25 450 Future Volume (veh/h) 89 321 32 25 450 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 357 36 29 529 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 Cap, veh/h 232 571 58 338 605 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1658 167 1753 1757 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 0 393 29 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1825 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.2 0.0 16.2 0.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2 0.0 16.2 0.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 232 0 629 338 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.00 0.63 0.09 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 232 0 629 338 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 21.2 0.0 24.6 18.0 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.0 4.6 0.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 0.0 7.5 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.9 0.0 29.3 18.5 0.0 LnGre LOS C A C B A Approach Vol, veh/h 492 587 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.8 41.9 Approach LOS C D imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 34.0 10.0 36.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 29.0 5.0 31.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.0 19.3 2.9 18.2 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.9 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.2 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 25 72 25 72 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1841 1811 29 87 0.85 0.83 4 6 33 328 0.34 0.06 96 1725 558 87 1853 1725 25.4 3.0 25.4 3.0 0.05 1.00 638 328 0.87 0.27 638 328 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 27.7 19.7 15.4 2.0 0.0 0.0 13.3 1.3 43.1 21.7 D C 6 7 34.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 29.0 5.0 17.2 5.2 1.6 0.0 2032 AM -Without Project t � NBT NBR � 277 49 277 49 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1826 1841 334 59 0.83 0.83 5 4 487 86 0.32 0.32 1511 267 0 393 0 1778 0.0 17.3 0.0 17.3 0.15 0 573 0.00 0.69 0 573 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 26.5 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 33.1 A C 480 31.0 C 8 36.0 5.0 31.0 27.4 1.2 04/19/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 75 243 69 75 243 69 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 1796 86 279 79 0.87 0.87 0.87 8 2 7 297 452 128 0.06 0.32 0.32 1697 1402 397 86 0 358 1697 0 1799 3.0 0.0 15.2 3.0 0.0 15.2 1.00 0.22 297 0 580 0.29 0.00 0.62 297 0 580 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 20.2 0.0 25.8 2.5 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 7.0 22.6 0.0 30.7 C A C 444 29.1 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 449 5 5 580 7 Future Vol, veh/h 17 449 5 5 580 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 MvmtFlow 19 510 6 6 682 8 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 692 0 0 519 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 912 -1057 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 910 -1054 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 203 910 -1054 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.158 0.021 -0.006 HCM Control Delay s) 26 9 0 -8.4 HCM Lane LOS D A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 8 1 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 15 2 15 Minor1 1274 1258 516 554 554 - 720 704 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.3 145 172 563 520 517 - 422 443 - 126 165 561 126 165 - 503 500 - 378 438 - NB 26 D WBT WBRSBLn1 -302 -0.172 0 -19.4 A C 0.6 SBL 6 6 0 Stop 73 0 8 Minor2 1260 700 560 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 149 433 516 139 139 420 486 SB 19.4 C 2032 AM -Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 3 29 3 29 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 73 73 0 0 4 40 1257 688 700 557 6.5 6.2 5.5 5.5 4 3.3 173 450 444 515 166 449 166 439 499 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2032 PM -Without Project 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/19/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 652 441 64 687 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 652 441 64 687 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 102 694 469 70 747 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 335 1370 601 288 1358 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1572 1810 3610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 694 469 70 747 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1791 1572 1810 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9 12.4 22.0 1.9 13.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9 12.4 22.0 1.9 13.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 335 1370 601 288 1358 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.51 0.78 0.24 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 388 1370 601 330 1358 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 15.7 19.8 22.8 15.4 20.5 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.3 9.7 0.4 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.1 9.4 0.8 5.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.2 21.1 32.4 15.9 22.1 LnGre LOS B C C B C Approach Vol, veh/h 1265 827 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.9 21.5 Approach LOS C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 37.0 7.3 30.4 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 7.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.9 24.0 3.0 6.1 4.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.2 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 9 289 54 45 9 289 54 45 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1870 1870 10 332 62 52 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0 0 2 2 604 447 285 239 0.38 0.17 0.30 0.30 1606 1810 939 788 10 332 0 114 1606 1810 0 1727 0.3 12.1 0.0 4.1 0.3 12.1 0.0 4.1 1.00 1.00 0.46 604 447 0 524 0.02 0.74 0.00 0.22 604 503 0 970 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 16.4 22.5 0.0 21.7 0.1 5.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.5 0.0 1.6 16.4 27.6 0.0 21.9 B C A C 446 26.2 C 6 7 8 36.5 19.4 18.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 31.0 17.0 35.0 15.6 14.1 11.8 4.5 0.3 1.3 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 21 70 97 21 70 97 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1885 26 88 121 0.80 0.80 0.80 0 0 1 340 114 157 0.03 0.16 0.16 1810 723 994 26 0 209 1810 0 1717 1.0 0.0 9.8 1.0 0.0 9.8 1.00 0.58 340 0 272 0.08 0.00 0.77 399 0 718 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 28.2 0.0 33.8 0.1 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.4 28.3 0.0 38.3 C A D 235 37.2 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¥ " ++ ttftTraffic Vol, veh/h 8 109 129 0 992 39 Future Vol, veh/h 8 109 129 0 992 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 -425 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 92 92 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 4 3 3 0 MvmtFlow 10 135 140 0 1102 43 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 1404 573 1145 0 0 Stage 1 1124 Stage 2 280 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.16 5.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.93 3.14 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 162 394 327 Stage 1 211 Stage 2 722 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 394 327 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 Stage 1 121 Stage 2 722 roach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 24.9 24 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 327 -323 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.429 -0.447 HCM Control Delay s) 24 -24.9 HCM Lane LOS C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 2.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2032 PM - Without Project 05/31/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Future Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 85 85 85 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 MvmtFlow 23 12 17 46 20 91 6 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 1036 1014 462 992 995 343 478 Stage 1 626 626 -353 353 Stage 2 410 388 -639 642 Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.56 6.2 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.054 3.3 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 212 240 604 227 241 704 1095 Stage 1 475 480 -668 624 Stage 2 623 612 -468 463 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 158 216 603 195 216 703 1093 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 158 216 -195 216 Stage 1 471 434 -663 620 Stage 2 521 608 -401 419 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 25.6 24 0.1 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1093 -226 343 1194 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 -0.23 0.456 0.068 HCM Control Delay s) 8.3 0 -25.6 24 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A D C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.9 2.3 0.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 287 67 76 287 67 76 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 94 94 93 1 0 0 305 71 82 Ma'or2 0 0 376 -4.1 2.2 -1194 -1194 SB 1.2 SBT SBR 0 A 2032 PM - Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 413 30 413 30 0 2 Free Free -None 0 0 93 93 1 0 444 32 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 106 457 61 95 389 Future Volume (veh/h) 106 457 61 95 389 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 112 481 64 100 409 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 Cap, veh/h 309 556 74 237 585 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1616 215 1795 1698 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 112 0 545 100 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1831 1795 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 0.0 25.0 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 0.0 25.0 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 309 0 631 237 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.00 0.86 0.42 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 309 0 631 237 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 19.5 0.0 27.5 21.1 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 0.0 14.7 5.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 12.9 1.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.8 0.0 42.2 26.5 0.0 LnGre LOS C A D C A Approach Vol, veh/h 657 550 Approach Delay, s/veh 38.9 30.7 Approach LOS D C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 34.0 10.0 36.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 29.0 5.0 31.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.2 14.9 5.2 27.0 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.3 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.0 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 39 46 39 46 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 1900 41 50 0.95 0.92 0 0 59 297 0.34 0.06 170 1810 450 50 1868 1810 18.7 1.6 18.7 1.6 0.09 1.00 644 297 0.70 0.17 644 297 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.5 19.9 6.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.7 31.7 21.1 C C 6 7 34.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 29.0 5.0 20.3 5.6 1.7 0.0 2032 PM -Without Project t � NBT NBR � 243 48 243 48 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1870 1841 264 52 0.92 0.92 2 4 489 96 0.32 0.32 1517 299 0 316 0 1815 0.0 12.9 0.0 12.9 0.16 0 585 0.00 0.54 0 585 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 25.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 28.6 A C 366 27.6 C 8 36.0 5.0 31.0 20.7 2.0 04/19/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 93 310 90 93 310 90 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 1900 98 326 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0 0 372 455 133 0.06 0.32 0.32 1795 1413 412 98 0 421 1795 0 1824 3.2 0.0 18.3 3.2 0.0 18.3 1.00 0.23 372 0 588 0.26 0.00 0.72 372 0 588 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 19.4 0.0 26.9 1.7 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 8.8 21.2 0.0 34.2 C A C 519 31.7 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 610 16 4 524 9 Future Vol, veh/h 18 610 16 4 524 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 6 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 19 635 17 4 540 9 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 551 0 0 653 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 1029 -943 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1027 -942 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 307 1027 -942 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.091 0.018 -0.004 HCM Control Delay s) 17.9 8.6 0 -8.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 1 4 14 1 4 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 68 68 68 0 0 7 1 6 21 Minor1 1266 1242 645 683 683 - 583 559 - 7.1 6.5 6.27 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.363 147 176 463 442 452 - 502 514 - 126 169 463 126 169 - 429 438 - 443 510 - NB 17.9 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -482 -0.124 0 -13.5 A B 0.4 SBL 0 0 0 Stop 72 0 0 Minor2 1250 555 695 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 151 520 436 137 137 504 399 SB 13.5 B 2032 PM -Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 2 41 2 41 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 72 72 0 5 3 57 1246 547 555 691 6.5 6.25 5.5 5.5 4 3.345 175 531 516 449 168 530 168 512 436 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2042 AM -Without Project 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/19/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 606 374 57 928 Future Volume (veh/h) 88 606 374 57 928 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1826 1841 1826 1856 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 681 420 62 1009 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 5 4 5 3 Cap, veh/h 276 1434 644 304 1427 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.05 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3469 1558 1739 3526 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 681 420 62 1009 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1735 1558 1739 1763 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 11.7 17.7 1.7 19.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 11.7 17.7 1.7 19.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 276 1434 644 304 1427 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.47 0.65 0.20 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 288 1434 644 351 1427 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 15.4 17.5 19.2 13.6 20.2 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 1.1 5.1 0.3 3.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 4.5 7.0 0.6 7.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.2 18.6 24.3 13.9 23.2 LnGre LOS B B C B C Approach Vol, veh/h 1200 1084 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.4 22.6 Approach LOS C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.8 38.7 7.3 26.7 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.7 19.7 3.1 7.6 4.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.3 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 12 239 61 68 12 239 61 68 0 0 0 0 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1841 1856 1841 13 266 68 76 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 4 3 4 637 393 213 238 0.40 0.15 0.27 0.27 1575 1753 800 894 13 266 0 144 1575 1753 0 1693 0.4 9.9 0.0 5.6 0.4 9.9 0.0 5.6 1.00 1.00 0.53 637 393 0 451 0.02 0.68 0.00 0.32 637 395 0 976 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 14.6 23.2 0.0 24.0 0.1 4.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.3 0.0 2.2 14.6 27.7 0.0 24.4 B C A C 410 26.6 C 6 7 8 38.0 16.9 17.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 33.0 12.0 40.0 21.5 11.9 10.8 5.3 0.0 1.3 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 26 70 108 26 70 108 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1885 1870 28 75 116 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 2 329 99 154 0.03 0.15 0.15 1810 666 1031 28 0 191 1810 0 1697 1.1 0.0 8.8 1.1 0.0 8.8 1.00 0.61 329 0 253 0.09 0.00 0.75 387 0 833 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 28.0 0.0 33.3 0.1 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.9 28.1 0.0 37.8 C A D 219 36.5 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¥ " ++ ttftTraffic Vol, veh/h 10 52 201 0 849 52 Future Vol, veh/h 10 52 201 0 849 52 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 -425 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 82 82 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 4 0 9 23 MvmtFlow 12 60 245 0 923 57 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 1444 492 982 0 0 Stage 1 954 Stage 2 490 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.22 5.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.96 3.14 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 153 439 393 Stage 1 268 Stage 2 568 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 57 438 392 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 57 Stage 1 100 Stage 2 567 roach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 30.7 28.3 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 392 -211 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.625 -0.342 HCM Control Delay s) 28.3 -30.7 HCM Lane LOS D D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.1 1.4 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2042 AM -Without Project 07/01/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Future Vol, veh/h 17 6 6 31 16 77 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 79 79 79 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 11 17 0 9 8 7 0 MvmtFlow 23 8 8 39 20 97 9 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 1021 1006 476 969 977 357 491 Stage 1 588 588 -374 374 Stage 2 433 418 -595 603 Critical Hdwy 7.21 6.67 6.2 7.19 6.58 6.27 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Follow-up Hdwy 3.599 4.153 3.3 3.581 4.072 3.363 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 207 227 593 226 245 676 1083 Stage 1 480 473 -633 607 Stage 2 584 566 -479 479 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 155 209 592 203 226 675 1082 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 155 209 -203 226 Stage 1 474 441 -626 600 Stage 2 477 560 -432 446 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 28.1 21.9 0.2 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1082 -195 367 1148 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 -0.204 0.428 0.049 HCM Control Delay s) 8.4 0 -28.1 21.9 8.3 HCM Lane LOS A A D C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.7 2.1 0.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 264 76 49 264 76 49 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 85 85 87 4 1 4 311 89 56 Ma'or2 0 0 400 -4.14 -2.236 -1148 -1148 SB 0.9 SBT SBR 0 A 2042 AM - Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 399 27 399 27 0 1 Free Free -None 0 0 87 87 4 0 459 31 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 89 382 32 25 511 Future Volume (veh/h) 89 382 32 25 511 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 424 36 29 601 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 Cap, veh/h 198 600 51 305 629 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1686 143 1753 1769 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 0 460 29 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1830 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.1 0.0 19.5 0.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.1 0.0 19.5 0.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 198 0 650 305 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.71 0.10 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 198 0 650 305 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 22.0 0.0 25.0 18.0 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 8.7 0.0 6.4 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 9.1 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.7 0.0 31.3 18.7 0.0 LnGre LOS C A C B A Approach Vol, veh/h 559 659 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.2 52.4 Approach LOS C D imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.0 22.1 2.9 21.5 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.0 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.3 HCM 6th LOS D 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 25 72 25 72 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1841 1811 29 87 0.85 0.83 4 6 30 279 0.36 0.06 85 1725 630 87 1855 1725 29.8 3.0 29.8 3.0 0.05 1.00 660 279 0.96 0.31 660 279 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 28.3 21.0 25.6 2.9 0.0 0.0 17.1 1.4 53.9 23.9 D C 6 7 33.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 28.0 5.0 20.2 5.1 1.5 0.0 2042 AM -Without Project t � NBT NBR � 314 49 314 49 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1826 1841 378 59 0.83 0.83 5 4 480 75 0.31 0.31 1542 241 0 437 0 1783 0.0 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.14 0 555 0.00 0.79 0 555 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 28.3 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 39.1 A D 524 36.6 D 8 37.0 5.0 32.0 31.8 0.1 04/19/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 75 288 69 75 288 69 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 1796 86 331 79 0.87 0.87 0.87 8 2 7 253 454 108 0.06 0.31 0.31 1697 1459 348 86 0 410 1697 0 1808 3.0 0.0 18.2 3.0 0.0 18.2 1.00 0.19 253 0 562 0.34 0.00 0.73 253 0 562 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 21.5 0.0 27.6 3.6 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 8.7 25.1 0.0 35.7 C A D 496 33.9 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 510 5 5 641 7 Future Vol, veh/h 17 510 5 5 641 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 MvmtFlow 19 580 6 6 754 8 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 764 0 0 589 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 858 -996 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 -993 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 164 856 -993 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 0.023 -0.006 HCM Control Delay s) 32.2 9.3 0 -8.6 HCM Lane LOS D A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 8 1 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 15 2 15 Minor1 1416 1400 586 624 624 - 792 776 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.3 116 142 514 477 481 - 385 410 - 99 135 513 99 135 - 460 464 - 341 405 - NB 32.2 D WBT WBRSBLn1 -257 -0.203 0 -22.5 A C 0.7 SBL 6 6 0 Stop 73 0 8 Minor2 1402 772 630 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 119 395 473 110 110 381 442 SB 22.5 C 2042 AM -Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 3 29 3 29 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 73 73 0 0 4 40 1399 760 772 627 6.5 6.2 5.5 5.5 4 3.3 142 409 412 479 135 408 135 407 462 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2042 PM -Without Project 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� 04/19/2022 ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 741 501 64 780 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 741 501 64 780 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 102 788 533 70 848 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 296 1360 597 254 1350 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1572 1810 3610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 788 533 70 848 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1791 1572 1810 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 15.2 27.6 2.0 16.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 15.2 27.6 2.0 16.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 296 1360 597 254 1350 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.58 0.89 0.28 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 325 1360 597 273 1350 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 17.0 21.4 25.3 16.7 22.3 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 1.8 18.2 0.6 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 6.3 12.9 0.8 7.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.7 23.2 43.5 17.2 24.5 LnGre LOS B C D B C Approach Vol, veh/h 1423 928 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.4 23.9 Approach LOS C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 38.0 7.3 32.5 9.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 33.0 5.0 47.0 6.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.0 29.6 3.0 6.2 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.7 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 9 317 54 45 9 317 54 45 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1870 1870 10 364 62 52 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0 0 2 2 600 468 297 249 0.37 0.19 0.32 0.32 1606 1810 939 788 10 364 0 114 1606 1810 0 1727 0.3 13.9 0.0 4.2 0.3 13.9 0.0 4.2 1.00 1.00 0.46 600 468 0 546 0.02 0.78 0.00 0.21 600 525 0 934 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 17.1 23.0 0.0 21.7 0.1 6.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 6.4 0.0 1.7 17.2 29.6 0.0 21.9 B C A C 478 27.8 C 6 7 8 37.5 21.2 18.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 32.0 19.0 33.0 18.7 15.9 12.2 4.8 0.4 1.2 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 21 70 97 21 70 97 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1885 26 88 121 0.80 0.80 0.80 0 0 1 334 113 155 0.03 0.16 0.16 1810 723 994 26 0 209 1810 0 1717 1.0 0.0 10.2 1.0 0.0 10.2 1.00 0.58 334 0 268 0.08 0.00 0.78 389 0 652 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 29.4 0.0 35.2 0.1 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 4.6 29.5 0.0 40.1 C A D 235 38.9 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¥ " ++ ttftTraffic Vol, veh/h 8 109 129 0 1127 39 Future Vol, veh/h 8 109 129 0 1127 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 -425 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 92 92 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 4 3 3 0 MvmtFlow 10 135 140 0 1252 43 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 1554 648 1295 0 0 Stage 1 1274 Stage 2 280 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.16 5.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.93 3.14 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 132 352 276 Stage 1 170 Stage 2 722 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 65 352 276 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 65 Stage 1 84 Stage 2 722 roach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 32.7 30.8 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 276 -270 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.508 -0.535 HCM Control Delay s) 30.8 -32.7 HCM Lane LOS D D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 2.9 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2042 PM -Without Project 07/01/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Future Vol, veh/h 18 9 13 39 17 77 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 85 85 85 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 MvmtFlow 23 12 17 46 20 91 6 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 1141 1119 527 1097 1100 383 543 Stage 1 691 691 -393 393 Stage 2 450 428 -704 707 Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.56 6.2 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.054 3.3 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 179 209 555 192 209 669 1036 Stage 1 438 449 -636 599 Stage 2 592 588 -431 432 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 130 186 554 163 186 668 1034 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 130 186 -163 186 Stage 1 434 402 -631 594 Stage 2 490 583 -364 387 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 30.9 29.7 0.1 HCM LOS D D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1034 -190 298 1154 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 -0.273 0.525 0.071 HCM Control Delay s) 8.5 0 -30.9 29.7 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A D D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.1 2.9 0.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 324 67 76 324 67 76 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 94 94 93 1 0 0 345 71 82 Ma'or2 0 0 416 -4.1 2.2 -1154 -1154 SB 1.1 SBT SBR 0 A 2042 PM - Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 473 30 473 30 0 2 Free Free -None 0 0 93 93 1 0 509 32 0 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 106 540 61 95 442 Future Volume (veh/h) 106 540 61 95 442 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 112 568 64 100 465 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 Cap, veh/h 285 587 66 194 612 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1650 186 1795 1720 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 112 0 632 100 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1836 1795 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 30.4 3.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 30.4 3.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 285 0 653 194 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.97 0.52 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 285 0 653 194 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 19.6 0.0 28.5 22.1 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 28.2 9.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 17.6 1.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.6 0.0 56.7 31.6 0.0 LnGre LOS C A E C A Approach Vol, veh/h 744 606 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.7 33.3 Approach LOS D C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.3 16.8 5.1 32.4 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.4 HCM 6th LOS D 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' WBR NBL 1'j 39 46 39 46 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 1900 41 50 0.95 0.92 0 0 54 240 0.36 0.06 152 1810 506 50 1872 1810 21.5 1.6 21.5 1.6 0.08 1.00 666 240 0.76 0.21 666 240 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.6 21.5 8.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.8 33.6 23.4 C C 6 7 33.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 28.0 5.0 24.2 5.5 1.1 0.0 2042 PM -Without Project t � NBT NBR � 275 48 275 48 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1870 1841 299 52 0.92 0.92 2 4 483 84 0.31 0.31 1551 270 0 351 0 1821 0.0 14.8 0.0 14.8 0.15 0 566 0.00 0.62 0 566 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 26.5 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 31.5 A C 401 30.5 C 8 37.0 5.0 32.0 23.5 2.0 04/19/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 93 370 90 93 370 90 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 1900 98 389 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0 0 332 459 112 0.06 0.31 0.31 1795 1474 360 98 0 484 1795 0 1834 3.3 0.0 22.2 3.3 0.0 22.2 1.00 0.20 332 0 571 0.30 0.00 0.85 332 0 571 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 20.4 0.0 29.0 2.3 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 11.6 22.7 0.0 43.6 C A D 582 40.0 D Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 693 16 4 577 9 Future Vol, veh/h 18 693 16 4 577 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 6 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 19 722 17 4 595 9 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 606 0 0 740 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 982 -876 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 980 -875 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 261 980 -875 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.107 0.019 -0.005 HCM Control Delay s) 20.4 8.7 0 -9.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 1 4 14 1 4 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 68 68 68 0 0 7 1 6 21 Minor1 1408 1384 732 770 770 - 638 614 - 7.1 6.5 6.27 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.363 118 145 413 396 413 - 468 486 - 100 139 413 100 139 - 383 399 - 409 482 - NB 20.4 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -440 -0.136 0 -14.5 A B 0.5 SBL 0 0 0 Stop 72 0 0 Minor2 1392 610 782 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 121 485 390 108 108 468 353 SB 14.5 B 2042 PM -Without Project 04/19/2022 SBT SBR * 2 41 2 41 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 72 72 0 5 3 57 1388 602 610 778 6.5 6.25 5.5 5.5 4 3.345 144 494 488 410 138 493 138 484 396 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Appendix E -Analysis Report Future Without Project Conditions Mitigation 2042 AM Without Project - Left Turn Lanes along Kekuanaoa Street 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j t 7' 1'j t Traffic Volume (veh/h) 89 382 32 25 511 Future Volume (veh/h) 89 382 32 25 511 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 424 36 29 601 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 Cap, veh/h 219 660 572 328 665 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1856 1608 1753 1870 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 424 36 29 601 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1856 1608 1753 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.1 17.2 1.3 0.9 27.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.1 17.2 1.3 0.9 27.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 219 660 572 328 665 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.64 0.06 0.09 0.90 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 219 660 572 328 665 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 21.3 24.2 19.1 17.6 27.5 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 4.8 0.2 0.5 18.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 8.0 0.5 0.4 14.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.9 29.0 19.3 18.1 45.5 LnGre LOS C C B B D Approach Vol, veh/h 559 659 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.2 43.1 Approach LOS C D imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.0 22.1 2.9 19.2 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.1 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.8 HCM 6th LOS D 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 25 72 314 49 25 72 314 49 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1841 1811 1826 1841 29 87 378 59 0.85 0.83 0.83 0.83 4 6 5 4 554 279 480 75 0.36 0.06 0.31 0.31 1558 1725 1542 241 29 87 0 437 1558 1725 0 1783 1.1 3.0 0.0 20.1 1.1 3.0 0.0 20.1 1.00 1.00 0.14 554 279 0 555 0.05 0.31 0.00 0.79 554 279 0 555 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 19.0 21.0 0.0 28.3 0.2 2.9 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.4 0.0 9.8 19.2 23.9 0.0 39.1 B C A D 524 36.6 D 6 7 8 33.0 10.0 37.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 20.2 5.1 29.5 1.5 0.0 1.0 04/20/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 75 288 69 75 288 69 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 1796 86 331 79 0.87 0.87 0.87 8 2 7 253 454 108 0.06 0.31 0.31 1697 1459 348 86 0 410 1697 0 1808 3.0 0.0 18.2 3.0 0.0 18.2 1.00 0.19 253 0 562 0.34 0.00 0.73 253 0 562 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 21.5 0.0 27.6 3.6 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 8.7 25.1 0.0 35.7 C A D 496 33.9 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2042 PM Without Project - Left Turn Lanes along Kekuanaoa Street 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j t 7' 1'j t Traffic Volume (veh/h) 106 540 61 95 442 Future Volume (veh/h) 106 540 61 95 442 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 112 568 64 100 465 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 Cap, veh/h 312 665 570 239 676 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1870 1603 1795 1900 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 112 568 64 100 465 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1870 1603 1795 1900 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 25.3 2.4 3.1 18.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 25.3 2.4 3.1 18.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 312 665 570 239 676 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.85 0.11 0.42 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 312 665 570 239 676 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 18.9 26.8 19.5 20.6 24.7 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 13.2 0.4 5.3 5.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 13.0 0.9 1.6 9.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.1 40.0 19.9 25.9 30.4 LnGre LOS C D B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 744 606 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.6 28.9 Approach LOS D C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.3 16.8 5.1 27.3 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.1 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t � WBR NBL NBT NBR 7' 1'j � 39 46 275 48 39 46 275 48 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1870 1841 41 50 299 52 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 2 4 570 240 483 84 0.36 0.06 0.31 0.31 1603 1810 1551 270 41 50 0 351 1603 1810 0 1821 1.5 1.6 0.0 14.8 1.5 1.6 0.0 14.8 1.00 1.00 0.15 570 240 0 566 0.07 0.21 0.00 0.62 570 240 0 566 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 19.2 21.5 0.0 26.5 0.2 2.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.0 6.9 19.4 23.4 0.0 31.5 B C A C 401 30.5 C 6 7 8 33.0 10.0 37.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 28.0 5.0 32.0 24.2 5.5 20.8 1.1 0.0 2.2 04/20/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 93 370 90 93 370 90 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 1900 98 389 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0 0 332 459 112 0.06 0.31 0.31 1795 1474 360 98 0 484 1795 0 1834 3.3 0.0 22.2 3.3 0.0 22.2 1.00 0.20 332 0 571 0.30 0.00 0.85 332 0 571 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 20.4 0.0 29.0 2.3 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 11.6 22.7 0.0 43.6 C A D 582 40.0 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Appendix F -Analysis Report Future With Project Conditions HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� ,> -+ • • +-'-' t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt 7' 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 501 322 60 767 12 202 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 88 501 322 60 767 12 202 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1826 1841 1826 1856 1900 1841 1856 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 563 362 65 834 13 224 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 5 4 5 3 0 4 3 Cap, veh/h 348 1491 670 365 1487 664 345 185 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3469 1558 1739 3526 1575 1753 782 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 563 362 65 834 13 224 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1735 1558 1739 1763 1575 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 8.6 13.5 1.6 14.0 0.4 8.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 8.6 13.5 1.6 14.0 0.4 8.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 348 1491 670 365 1487 664 345 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.38 0.54 0.18 0.56 0.02 0.65 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 361 1491 670 392 1487 664 345 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 12.8 15.2 16.6 11.9 17.1 13.2 23.4 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.7 3.1 0.2 1.5 0.1 4.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.3 5.2 0.6 5.5 0.1 3.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.2 15.9 19.7 12.1 18.7 13.2 27.6 0.0 LnGre LOS B B B B B B C A Approach Vol, veh/h 1024 912 371 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.0 18.1 26.8 Approach LOS B B C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.8 38.6 7.3 23.5 9.4 38.0 14.0 16.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 33.0 5.0 47.0 5.0 33.0 9.0 43.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.6 15.5 3.0 7.7 4.4 16.0 10.1 10.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.3 0.0 1.3 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.4 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2027 AM -With Project � NBR 71 71 0 1.00 1.00 1841 79 0.90 4 215 0.24 909 147 1691 5.7 5.7 0.54 401 0.37 1016 1.00 1.00 24.9 0.6 0.0 2.2 25.5 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 26 70 108 26 70 108 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1885 1870 28 75 116 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 2 335 101 156 0.03 0.15 0.15 1810 666 1031 28 0 191 1810 0 1697 1.0 0.0 8.4 1.0 0.0 8.4 1.00 0.61 335 0 256 0.08 0.00 0.74 398 0 933 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 26.7 0.0 31.8 0.1 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.7 26.8 0.0 36.0 C A D 219 34.9 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2027 AM -Hawaii Rt 11 and Piilani Street Acceleartion Lane Modeled 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street 06/01/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7 Movement EBL EBR Lane Configurations V Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 66 Future Vol, veh/h 12 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 MvmtFlow 14 77 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1330 414 Stage 1 796 Stage 2 534 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.96 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 178 493 Stage 1 334 Stage 2 540 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 76 492 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 76 Stage 1 143 Stage 2 539 roach EB HCM Control Delay, s 25.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL Capacity (veh/h) 467 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.572 HCM Control Delay s) 22.5 HCM Lane LOS C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.5 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT SBT SBR � tt tttt 219 0 702 56 219 0 702 56 2 0 0 2 Free Free Free Free -None -None425 0 0 0 0 82 82 92 92 4 0 9 23 267 0 763 61 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 826 0 0 5.38 3.14 468 467 NB SB 22.5 0 NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR-267-0.34-25.3 D 1.4 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 23 18 31 40 77 24 Future Vol, veh/h 29 23 18 31 40 77 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 79 79 79 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 11 17 0 9 8 7 0 MvmtFlow 40 32 25 39 51 97 28 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 954 923 410 906 903 302 434 Stage 1 522 522 -357 357 Stage 2 432 401 -549 546 Critical Hdwy 7.21 6.67 6.2 7.19 6.58 6.27 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Follow-up Hdwy 3.599 4.153 3.3 3.581 4.072 3.363 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 230 255 646 250 271 726 1136 Stage 1 522 507 -646 618 Stage 2 585 576 -508 508 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 156 232 645 201 246 725 1135 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 156 232 -201 246 Stage 1 505 475 -626 599 Stage 2 449 558 -428 476 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 32.6 26.5 0.6 HCM LOS D D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1135 -224 350 1203 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 -0.428 0.535 0.047 HCM Control Delay s) 8.3 0 -32.6 26.5 8.1 HCM Lane LOS A A D D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 2 3 0.1 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 218 76 49 218 76 49 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 85 85 87 4 1 4 256 89 56 Ma'or2 0 0 345 -4.14 -2.236 -1203 -1203 SB 0.9 SBT SBR 0 A SBT * 334 334 0 Free 2027 AM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 43 43 1 Free -None 0 0 87 4 384 0 87 0 49 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 294 32 25 423 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 294 32 25 423 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 107 327 36 29 498 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 Cap, veh/h 239 547 60 345 583 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1642 181 1753 1750 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 107 0 363 29 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1823 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 14.9 0.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 14.9 0.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 239 0 608 345 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.00 0.60 0.08 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 239 0 608 345 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 21.5 0.0 25.0 18.4 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 6.0 0.0 4.3 0.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 6.9 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.5 0.0 29.3 18.8 0.0 LnGre LOS C A C B A Approach Vol, veh/h 470 556 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.9 40.8 Approach LOS C D imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 35.0 10.0 35.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 30.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.9 18.5 2.9 16.9 4.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.7 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.0 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t WBR NBL NBT 1'j � 25 72 270 25 72 270 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1841 1811 1826 29 87 325 0.85 0.83 0.83 4 6 5 34 348 501 0.33 0.06 0.33 102 1725 1504 527 87 0 1852 1725 0 23.9 2.9 0.0 23.9 2.9 0.0 0.06 1.00 617 348 0 0.85 0.25 0.00 617 348 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 28.0 19.0 0.0 14.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 1.3 0.0 42.0 20.7 0.0 D C A 471 29.0 C 6 7 8 35.0 10.0 35.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 30.0 16.5 5.5 25.9 1.7 0.0 1.2 2027 AM -With Project � NBR 49 49 0 1.00 1.00 1841 59 0.83 4 91 0.33 273 384 1777 16.5 16.5 0.15 592 0.65 592 1.00 1.00 25.5 5.4 0.0 7.5 30.9 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 75 230 74 75 230 74 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 1796 86 264 85 0.87 0.87 0.87 8 2 7 317 452 145 0.06 0.33 0.33 1697 1355 436 86 0 349 1697 0 1792 2.9 0.0 14.5 2.9 0.0 14.5 1.00 0.24 317 0 597 0.27 0.00 0.58 317 0 597 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 19.4 0.0 24.8 2.1 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 6.6 21.5 0.0 29.0 C A C 435 27.5 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 429 5 5 558 7 Future Vol, veh/h 24 429 5 5 558 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 MvmtFlow 27 488 6 6 656 8 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 666 0 0 497 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 933 -1077 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 931 -1074 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 208 931 -1074 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.154 0.029 -0.005 HCM Control Delay s) 25.4 9 0 8.4 HCM Lane LOS D A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 8 1 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 15 2 15 Minor1 1246 1226 494 548 548 - 698 678 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.3 152 180 579 524 520 - 434 455 - 129 170 577 129 170 - 501 498 - 383 450 - NB 25.4 D WBT WBRSBLn1 -325 -0.181 0 -18.5 A C 0.7 SBL 6 6 0 Stop 73 0 8 Minor2 1228 674 554 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 156 448 520 145 145 429 484 SB 18.5 C SBT * 3 3 0 Stop 2027 AM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 34 34 0 Stop -None 0 0 73 0 4 1225 674 551 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 180 457 519 170 170 452 497 73 0 47 662 6.2 3.3 465 464 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� ,> -+ • • +-'-' t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt 7' 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 613 418 65 645 9 281 54 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 613 418 65 645 9 281 54 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 102 652 445 71 701 10 323 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 Cap, veh/h 354 1376 604 303 1366 607 442 279 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1572 1810 3610 1606 1810 930 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 652 445 71 701 10 323 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1791 1572 1810 1805 1606 1810 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 11.4 20.2 1.9 12.5 0.3 11.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 11.4 20.2 1.9 12.5 0.3 11.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 354 1376 604 303 1366 607 442 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.47 0.74 0.23 0.51 0.02 0.73 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 429 1376 604 346 1366 607 505 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 15.3 19.3 22.0 15.1 20.0 16.2 22.5 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 1.2 7.8 0.4 1.4 0.0 4.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 4.7 8.5 0.8 5.2 0.1 5.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.7 20.5 29.8 15.5 21.4 16.2 27.1 0.0 LnGre LOS B C C B C B C A Approach Vol, veh/h 1199 782 438 Approach Delay, s/veh 23.5 20.8 25.8 Approach LOS C C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 37.0 7.3 30.0 9.5 36.5 19.1 18.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 8.0 30.0 17.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.9 22.2 3.0 6.2 4.8 14.5 13.7 11.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 4.2 0.3 1.3 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.3 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2027 PM -With Project � NBR 46 46 0 1.00 1.00 1870 53 0.87 2 239 0.30 795 115 1725 4.2 4.2 0.46 518 0.22 974 1.00 1.00 21.9 0.2 0.0 1.6 22.1 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 21 70 97 21 70 97 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1885 26 88 121 0.80 0.80 0.80 0 0 1 340 114 157 0.03 0.16 0.16 1810 723 994 26 0 209 1810 0 1717 1.0 0.0 9.7 1.0 0.0 9.7 1.00 0.58 340 0 272 0.08 0.00 0.77 400 0 721 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 28.0 0.0 33.6 0.1 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.3 28.1 0.0 38.1 C A D 235 37.0 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations V � tt tttt Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 116 134 0 931 40 Future Vol, veh/h 8 116 134 0 931 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 -425 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 92 92 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 4 3 3 0 MvmtFlow 10 143 146 0 1034 44 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 1348 539 1078 0 0 Stage 1 1056 Stage 2 292 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.16 5.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.93 3.14 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 174 415 353 Stage 1 232 Stage 2 712 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 102 415 353 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 102 Stage 1 136 Stage 2 712 roach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 23.4 22.2 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 353 -346 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.413 -0.442 HCM Control Delay s) 22.2 -23.4 HCM Lane LOS C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 2.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2027 PM -With Project 06/01/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 16 18 39 23 77 11 Future Vol, veh/h 23 16 18 39 23 77 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 85 85 85 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 MvmtFlow 30 21 23 46 27 91 12 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 1015 989 437 974 972 331 455 Stage 1 601 601 -353 353 Stage 2 414 388 -621 619 Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.56 6.2 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.054 3.3 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 219 249 624 233 249 715 1116 Stage 1 491 493 -668 624 Stage 2 620 612 -478 474 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 159 223 623 192 223 714 1114 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 159 223 -192 223 Stage 1 483 447 -659 615 Stage 2 509 603 -399 430 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 27.6 25.5 0.3 HCM LOS D D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1114 -232 336 1206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 -0.319 0.487 0.068 HCM Control Delay s) 8.3 0 -27.6 25.5 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A D D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.3 2.5 0.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 275 67 76 275 67 76 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 94 94 93 1 0 0 293 71 82 Ma'or2 0 0 364 -4.1 2.2 -1206 -1206 SB 1.3 SBT SBR 0 A SBT * 387 387 0 Free 2027 PM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 34 34 2 Free -None 0 0 93 1 416 0 93 0 37 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 108 420 61 95 366 Future Volume (veh/h) 108 420 61 95 366 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 114 442 64 100 385 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 Cap, veh/h 312 532 77 250 562 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1596 231 1795 1687 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 114 0 506 100 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1828 1795 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 23.0 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 23.0 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 312 0 609 250 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.00 0.83 0.40 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 312 0 609 250 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 19.9 0.0 27.7 21.1 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 0.0 12.5 4.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 11.6 1.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.2 0.0 40.1 25.8 0.0 LnGre LOS C A D C A Approach Vol, veh/h 620 526 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.0 30.8 Approach LOS D C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 35.0 10.0 35.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 30.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.2 14.0 5.2 25.0 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.4 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.4 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t WBR NBL NBT 1'j � 39 46 231 39 46 231 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1870 41 50 251 0.95 0.92 0.92 0 0 2 60 327 501 0.33 0.06 0.33 180 1810 1502 426 50 0 1867 1810 0 17.7 1.6 0.0 17.7 1.6 0.0 0.10 1.00 622 327 0 0.68 0.15 0.00 622 327 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 25.9 18.9 0.0 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.7 0.0 31.9 19.9 0.0 C B A 353 26.0 C 6 7 8 35.0 10.0 35.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 30.0 18.9 5.7 19.7 1.8 0.0 1.8 2027 PM -With Project � NBR 48 48 0 1.00 1.00 1841 52 0.92 4 104 0.33 311 303 1813 12.0 12.0 0.17 604 0.50 604 1.00 1.00 24.0 3.0 0.0 5.4 27.0 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 93 287 92 93 287 92 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 1900 98 302 97 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0 0 396 459 147 0.06 0.33 0.33 1795 1377 442 98 0 399 1795 0 1819 3.2 0.0 16.9 3.2 0.0 16.9 1.00 0.24 396 0 606 0.25 0.00 0.66 396 0 606 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 18.7 0.0 25.6 1.5 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 7.9 20.1 0.0 31.1 C A C 497 29.0 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 575 16 4 503 9 Future Vol, veh/h 20 575 16 4 503 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 6 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 21 599 17 4 519 9 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 530 0 0 617 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 1048 -973 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1046 -972 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 327 1046 -972 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 0.02 -0.004 HCM Control Delay s) 17 8.5 0 8.7 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 1 4 14 1 4 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 68 68 68 0 0 7 1 6 21 Minor1 1214 1189 609 651 651 - 563 538 - 7.1 6.5 6.27 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.363 160 190 486 461 468 - 514 526 - 137 182 486 137 182 - 446 453 - 453 522 - NB 17 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -500 -0.125 0 -13.2 A B 0.4 SBL 0 0 0 Stop 72 0 0 Minor2 1197 534 663 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 164 534 454 149 149 516 416 SB 13.2 B SBT * 2 2 0 Stop 2027 PM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 43 43 0 Stop -None 0 0 72 72 0 5 3 60 1193 526 534 659 6.5 6.25 5.5 5.5 4 3.345 188 546 528 464 180 545 180 524 449 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� ,> -+ • • +-'-' t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt 7' 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 534 342 60 818 12 216 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 88 534 342 60 818 12 216 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1826 1841 1826 1856 1900 1841 1856 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 600 384 65 889 13 240 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 5 4 5 3 0 4 3 Cap, veh/h 323 1470 660 343 1466 655 362 193 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.05 0.42 0.42 0.13 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3469 1558 1739 3526 1575 1753 782 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 600 384 65 889 13 240 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1735 1558 1739 1763 1575 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 9.6 15.0 1.7 15.6 0.4 8.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.5 9.6 15.0 1.7 15.6 0.4 8.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 323 1470 660 343 1466 655 362 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.41 0.58 0.19 0.61 0.02 0.66 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 336 1470 660 391 1466 655 362 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 13.6 15.9 17.5 12.4 18.1 13.7 23.3 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.8 3.7 0.3 1.9 0.1 4.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.7 5.8 0.6 6.2 0.1 3.9 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.1 16.8 21.2 12.7 20.0 13.7 27.8 0.0 LnGre LOS B B C B B B C A Approach Vol, veh/h 1083 967 387 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.1 19.4 26.8 Approach LOS B B C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.8 38.6 7.3 24.6 9.4 38.0 15.0 16.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 5.0 33.0 10.0 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.7 17.0 3.0 7.7 4.5 17.6 10.8 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.3 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.3 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2032 AM -With Project � NBR 71 71 0 1.00 1.00 1841 79 0.90 4 225 0.25 909 147 1691 5.7 5.7 0.54 418 0.35 1001 1.00 1.00 24.6 0.5 0.0 2.2 25.1 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 26 70 108 26 70 108 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1885 1870 28 75 116 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 2 333 100 155 0.03 0.15 0.15 1810 666 1031 28 0 191 1810 0 1697 1.0 0.0 8.6 1.0 0.0 8.6 1.00 0.61 333 0 255 0.08 0.00 0.75 394 0 898 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 27.1 0.0 32.3 0.1 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.8 27.3 0.0 36.6 C A D 219 35.4 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSEAM -With Project -Hawaii Rt 11 and Piilani Street Acceleration Lane Modeled 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street 06/27/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.7 Movement EBL EBR Lane Configurations V Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 67 Future Vol, veh/h 13 67 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 MvmtFlow 15 78 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1382 440 Stage 1 846 Stage 2 536 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.96 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 166 474 Stage 1 311 Stage 2 539 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 65 473 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 65 Stage 1 122 Stage 2 538 roach EB HCM Control Delay, s 30.2 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL Capacity (veh/h) 441 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.608 HCM Control Delay s) 25 HCM Lane LOS D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.9 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT SBT SBR � tt tttt 220 0 748 57 220 0 748 57 2 0 0 2 Free Free Free Free -None -None 425 0 0 0 0 82 82 92 92 4 0 9 23 268 0 813 62 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 877 0 0 5.38 3.14 442 441 NB SB 25 0 NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR-234 -0.398-30.2 D 1.8 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 23 18 31 40 77 24 Future Vol, veh/h 29 23 18 31 40 77 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 79 79 79 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 11 17 0 9 8 7 0 MvmtFlow 40 32 25 39 51 97 28 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 995 964 433 947 944 320 457 Stage 1 545 545 -375 375 Stage 2 450 419 -572 569 Critical Hdwy 7.21 6.67 6.2 7.19 6.58 6.27 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.21 5.67 -6.19 5.58 Follow-up Hdwy 3.599 4.153 3.3 3.581 4.072 3.363 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 215 241 627 234 256 709 1114 Stage 1 507 495 -632 607 Stage 2 572 565 -493 496 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 143 218 626 186 232 708 1113 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 143 218 -186 232 Stage 1 490 463 -612 588 Stage 2 436 547 -413 464 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 36.3 29.3 0.6 HCM LOS E D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1113 -208 330 1185 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 -0.461 0.568 0.048 HCM Control Delay s) 8.3 0 -36.3 29.3 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A E D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 2.2 3.3 0.1 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 233 76 49 233 76 49 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 85 85 87 4 1 4 274 89 56 Ma'or2 0 0 363 -4.14 -2.236 -1185 -1185 SB 0.9 SBT SBR 0 A SBT * 354 354 0 Free 2032 AM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 43 43 1 Free -None 0 0 87 4 407 0 87 0 49 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 322 32 25 451 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 322 32 25 451 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 107 358 36 29 531 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 Cap, veh/h 230 571 57 337 605 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1658 167 1753 1757 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 107 0 394 29 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1825 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 16.2 0.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 16.2 0.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 230 0 629 337 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.00 0.63 0.09 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 230 0 629 337 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 21.4 0.0 24.7 18.0 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 0.0 4.7 0.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 7.5 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.0 0.0 29.3 18.5 0.0 LnGre LOS C A C B A Approach Vol, veh/h 501 589 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.0 42.2 Approach LOS C D imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 34.0 10.0 36.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 29.0 5.0 31.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.0 20.0 2.9 18.2 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.9 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.7 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t WBR NBL NBT 1'j � 25 72 287 25 72 287 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1841 1811 1826 29 87 346 0.85 0.83 0.83 4 6 5 33 317 490 0.34 0.06 0.32 96 1725 1520 560 87 0 1853 1725 0 25.6 3.0 0.0 25.6 3.0 0.0 0.05 1.00 638 317 0 0.88 0.27 0.00 638 317 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 27.7 19.9 0.0 15.7 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 1.3 0.0 43.4 22.1 0.0 D C A 492 31.8 C 6 7 8 34.0 10.0 36.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 29.0 5.0 31.0 18.0 5.5 27.6 1.6 0.0 1.2 2032 AM -With Project � NBR 49 49 0 1.00 1.00 1841 59 0.83 4 84 0.32 259 405 1779 18.0 18.0 0.15 573 0.71 573 1.00 1.00 26.8 7.2 0.0 8.4 33.9 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB . 1'j � 75 251 74 75 251 74 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 1796 86 289 85 0.87 0.87 0.87 8 2 7 289 447 132 0.06 0.32 0.32 1697 1388 408 86 0 374 1697 0 1797 3.0 0.0 16.0 3.0 0.0 16.0 1.00 0.23 289 0 579 0.30 0.00 0.65 289 0 579 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 20.3 0.0 26.1 2.6 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 7.4 23.0 0.0 31.6 C A C 460 30.0 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 456 5 5 586 7 Future Vol, veh/h 24 456 5 5 586 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 MvmtFlow 27 518 6 6 689 8 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 699 0 0 527 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 907 -1050 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 905 -1047 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 189 905 -1047 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.17 0.03 -0.006 HCM Control Delay s) 27.9 9.1 0 -8.5 HCM Lane LOS D A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR* 8 1 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 15 2 15 Minor1 1309 1289 524 578 578 - 731 711 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.3 138 165 557 505 504 - 416 439 - 116 156 555 116 156 - 482 481 - 366 434 - NB 27.9 D WBT WBRSBLn1 -304 - 0.194 0 -19.7 A C 0.7 SBL 6 6 0 Stop 73 0 8 Minor2 1291 707 584 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 142 429 501 131 131 410 465 SB 19.7 C SBT * 3 3 0 Stop 2032 AM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 34 34 0 Stop -None 0 0 73 0 4 1288 707 581 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 165 441 503 156 156 436 480 73 0 47 695 6.2 3.3 446 445 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� ,> -+ • • +-'-' t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt 7' 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 653 445 65 687 9 293 54 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 653 445 65 687 9 293 54 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 102 695 473 71 747 10 337 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 Cap, veh/h 334 1364 599 286 1353 602 452 285 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1572 1810 3610 1606 1810 930 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 695 473 71 747 10 337 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1791 1572 1810 1805 1606 1810 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9 12.5 22.4 2.0 13.7 0.3 12.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9 12.5 22.4 2.0 13.7 0.3 12.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 334 1364 599 286 1353 602 452 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.51 0.79 0.25 0.55 0.02 0.75 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 1364 599 328 1353 602 522 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 15.8 20.0 23.1 15.6 20.7 16.5 22.5 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.4 10.2 0.4 1.6 0.1 5.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.2 9.7 0.8 5.7 0.1 5.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.4 21.4 33.3 16.0 22.3 16.6 27.5 0.0 LnGre LOS B C C B C B C A Approach Vol, veh/h 1270 828 452 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 21.7 26.0 Approach LOS C C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 37.0 7.3 30.7 9.5 36.5 19.7 18.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 7.0 31.0 18.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.0 24.4 3.0 6.2 4.9 15.7 14.4 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 4.5 0.4 1.3 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.4 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2032 PM -With Project � NBR 46 46 0 1.00 1.00 1870 53 0.87 2 243 0.31 795 115 1725 4.2 4.2 0.46 528 0.22 965 1.00 1.00 21.7 0.2 0.0 1.6 21.9 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 21 70 97 21 70 97 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1885 26 88 121 0.80 0.80 0.80 0 0 1 339 114 157 0.03 0.16 0.16 1810 723 994 26 0 209 1810 0 1717 1.0 0.0 9.8 1.0 0.0 9.8 1.00 0.58 339 0 271 0.08 0.00 0.77 397 0 694 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 28.3 0.0 33.9 0.1 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.4 28.4 0.0 38.6 C A D 235 37.5 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2032 PM -With Project -Hawaii Rt 11 and Piilani Acceleration Lane Modeled 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street 06/27/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.2 Movement EBL EBR Lane Configurations V Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 116 Future Vol, veh/h 8 116 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 MvmtFlow 10 143 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1417 574 Stage 1 1125 Stage 2 292 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.93 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 159 394 Stage 1 210 Stage 2 712 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 88 394 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 88 Stage 1 116 Stage 2 712 roach EB HCM Control Delay, s 25.9 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL Capacity (veh/h) 327 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.445 HCM Control Delay s) 24.6 HCM Lane LOS C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT SBT SBR � tt tttt 134 0 993 40 134 0 993 40 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free -None -None 425 0 0 0 0 92 92 90 90 4 3 3 0 146 0 1103 44 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 1147 0 0 5.38 3.14 327 327 NB SB 24.6 0 NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR-322 -0.475-25.9 D 2.4 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 16 18 39 23 77 11 Future Vol, veh/h 23 16 18 39 23 77 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 85 85 85 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 MvmtFlow 30 21 23 46 27 91 12 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All 1056 1030 466 1015 1013 343 484 Stage 1 630 630 -365 365 Stage 2 426 400 -650 648 Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.56 6.2 4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.56 Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4.054 3.3 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 205 235 601 219 235 704 1089 Stage 1 473 478 -658 616 Stage 2 610 605 -461 460 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 148 210 600 179 210 703 1087 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 148 210 -179 210 Stage 1 465 432 -649 607 Stage 2 500 597 -382 416 roach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 29.8 27.7 0.3 HCM LOS D D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL Capacity (veh/h) 1087 -218 318 1194 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 -0.34 0.514 0.068 HCM Control Delay s) 8.3 0 -29.8 27.7 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A D D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.4 2.8 0.2 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBT NBR SBL * 287 67 76 287 67 76 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 94 94 93 1 0 0 305 71 82 Ma'or2 0 0 376 -4.1 2.2 -1194 -1194 SB 1.2 SBT SBR 0 A SBT * 414 414 0 Free 2032 PM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 34 34 2 Free -None 0 0 93 1 445 0 93 0 37 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street ,> -+ • • +- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Lane Configurations 1'j � 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 108 458 61 95 390 Future Volume (veh/h) 108 458 61 95 390 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 114 482 64 100 411 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 Cap, veh/h 308 557 74 237 585 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1616 215 1795 1699 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 114 0 546 100 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1831 1795 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 25.1 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 25.1 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 308 0 631 237 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.00 0.87 0.42 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 308 0 631 237 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 19.5 0.0 27.6 21.1 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 0.0 14.8 5.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 12.9 1.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.9 0.0 42.4 26.5 0.0 LnGre LOS C A D C A Approach Vol, veh/h 660 552 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.0 30.9 Approach LOS D C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 34.0 10.0 36.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 29.0 5.0 31.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.2 15.0 5.2 27.1 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.3 0.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.2 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline '-' t WBR NBL NBT 1'j � 39 46 246 39 46 246 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1870 41 50 267 0.95 0.92 0.92 0 0 2 58 292 490 0.34 0.06 0.32 169 1810 1520 452 50 0 1869 1810 0 18.8 1.6 0.0 18.8 1.6 0.0 0.09 1.00 644 292 0 0.70 0.17 0.00 644 292 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 25.5 20.0 0.0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.7 0.0 31.8 21.2 0.0 C C A 369 27.7 C 6 7 8 34.0 10.0 36.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 29.0 5.0 31.0 20.7 5.7 20.8 1.6 0.0 2.0 2032 PM -With Project � NBR 48 48 0 1.00 1.00 1841 52 0.92 4 95 0.32 296 319 1816 13.0 13.0 0.16 585 0.55 585 1.00 1.00 25.1 3.6 0.0 5.9 28.7 C 06/27/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 93 314 92 93 314 92 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 1900 98 331 97 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0 0 370 455 133 0.06 0.32 0.32 1795 1411 413 98 0 428 1795 0 1824 3.2 0.0 18.7 3.2 0.0 18.7 1.00 0.23 370 0 588 0.27 0.00 0.73 370 0 588 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 19.5 0.0 27.0 1.7 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 9.0 21.2 0.0 34.7 C A C 526 32.2 C Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 613 16 4 527 9 Future Vol, veh/h 20 613 16 4 527 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 6 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 21 639 17 4 543 9 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 554 0 0 657 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 1026 -940 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1024 -939 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 304 1024 -939 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.092 0.02 -0.004 HCM Control Delay s) 18 8.6 0 8.9 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 1 4 14 1 4 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 68 68 68 0 0 7 1 6 21 Minor1 1278 1253 649 691 691 - 587 562 - 7.1 6.5 6.27 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.363 144 174 461 438 449 - 499 513 - 122 167 461 122 167 - 424 434 - 438 509 - NB 18 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -481-0.13 0 -13.6 A B 0.4 SBL 0 0 0 Stop 72 0 0 Minor2 1261 558 703 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 148 518 431 133 133 500 393 SB 13.6 B SBT * 2 2 0 Stop 2032 PM -With Project 06/27/2022 SBR 43 43 0 Stop -None 0 0 72 72 0 5 3 60 1257 550 558 699 6.5 6.25 5.5 5.5 4 3.345 173 529 515 445 166 528 166 511 430 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� ,> -+ • • +-'-' t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt 7' 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 606 387 60 929 12 248 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 88 606 387 60 929 12 248 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1826 1841 1826 1856 1900 1841 1856 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 99 681 435 65 1010 13 276 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 5 4 5 3 0 4 3 Cap, veh/h 275 1428 641 302 1425 636 394 209 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.15 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3469 1558 1739 3526 1575 1753 782 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 681 435 65 1010 13 276 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1735 1558 1739 1763 1575 1753 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 11.7 18.6 1.7 19.5 0.4 10.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 11.7 18.6 1.7 19.5 0.4 10.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 275 1428 641 302 1425 636 394 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.48 0.68 0.21 0.71 0.02 0.70 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 1428 641 348 1425 636 394 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 15.5 17.6 19.6 13.6 20.3 14.6 23.3 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 1.1 5.7 0.4 3.0 0.1 5.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 4.6 7.4 0.7 8.0 0.2 4.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.3 18.7 25.3 14.0 23.3 14.7 28.7 0.0 LnGre LOS B B C B C B C A Approach Vol, veh/h 1215 1088 423 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 22.7 27.2 Approach LOS C C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 38.6 7.4 26.8 9.5 38.0 17.0 17.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 32.0 5.0 47.0 5.0 33.0 12.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.7 20.6 3.1 7.7 4.6 21.5 12.4 10.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.3 0.0 1.3 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.6 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2042 AM -With Project � NBR 71 71 0 1.00 1.00 1841 79 0.90 4 243 0.27 909 147 1691 5.7 5.7 0.54 452 0.33 973 1.00 1.00 24.0 0.4 0.0 2.2 24.4 C 06/28/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 26 70 108 26 70 108 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1885 1870 28 75 116 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 2 328 99 154 0.03 0.15 0.15 1810 666 1031 28 0 191 1810 0 1697 1.1 0.0 8.8 1.1 0.0 8.8 1.00 0.61 328 0 253 0.09 0.00 0.75 387 0 832 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 28.0 0.0 33.3 0.1 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.9 28.1 0.0 37.8 C A D 219 36.6 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2042 AM -With Project -Rt 11 and Piilani Acceleration Lane Modeled 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street 06/28/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 9.5 Movement EBL EBR Lane Configurations V Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 67 Future Vol, veh/h 13 67 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 MvmtFlow 15 78 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1493 495 Stage 1 957 Stage 2 536 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.96 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 143 437 Stage 1 267 Stage 2 539 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 45 436 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 45 Stage 1 83 Stage 2 538 roach EB HCM Control Delay, s 44.2 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL Capacity (veh/h) 390 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.688 HCM Control Delay s) 32.3 HCM Lane LOS D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT SBT SBR � tt tttt 220 0 850 57 220 0 850 57 2 0 0 2 Free Free Free Free -None -None 425 0 0 0 0 82 82 92 92 4 0 9 23 268 0 924 62 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 988 0 0 5.38 3.14 391 390 NB SB 32.3 0 NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR-181 -0.514-44.2 E 2.6 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6thAWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street 2042 AM -With Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street .J-� • 'f � '- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations "'i +r "'i +rTraffic Volume (veh/h) 96 383 32 25 512 25Future Volume (veh/h) 96 383 32 25 512 25Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1900 1841 1870 1841 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 107 426 36 29 602 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 4 2 4 Cap, veh/h 218 660 572 327 665 554 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1856 1608 1753 1870 1558 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 107 426 36 29 602 29 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1856 1608 1753 1870 1558 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 17.3 1.3 0.9 27.5 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 17.3 1.3 0.9 27.5 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 218 660 572 327 665 554 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.65 0.06 0.09 0.91 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 218 660 572 327 665 554 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 21.5 24.3 19.1 17.6 27.6 19.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 7.7 4.8 0.2 0.5 18.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1 .8 8.1 0.5 0.4 14.9 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.1 29.1 19.3 18.1 45.7 19.2 LnGre LOS C C B B D B Approach Vol, veh/h 569 660 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.5 43.3 Approach LOS C D imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), t0.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax�.S 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1ey,is 23.0 2.9 19.3 5.0 21.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.6 HCM 6th LOS D 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline � t I" NBL NBT NBR "'i ft 72 325 49 72 325 49 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1811 1826 1841 87 392 59 0.83 0.83 0.83 6 5 4 269 482 73 0.06 0.31 0.31 1725 1551 233 87 0 451 1725 0 1784 3.0 0.0 21.0 3.0 0.0 21.0 1.00 0.13 269 0 555 0.32 0.00 0.81 269 0 555 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 21.2 0.0 28.6 3.2 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 10.4 24.4 0.0 40.9 C A D 538 38.2 D 7 8 10.0 37.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 32.0 5.4 29.5 0.0 1.0 '. ! SBL SBT "'i � 75 295 75 295 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1781 1870 86 339 0.87 0.87 8 2 244 449 0.06 0.31 1697 1443 86 0 1697 0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.00 244 0 0.35 0.00 244 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 21.7 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 25.7 0.0 C A 510 35.1 D 2042 AM -With Project � SBR 74 74 0 1.00 1.00 1796 85 0.87 7 113 0.31 362 424 1805 19.0 19.0 0.20 562 0.75 562 1.00 1.00 27.9 9.1 0.0 9.2 37.0 D 06/28/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 517 5 5 647 7 Future Vol, veh/h 24 517 5 5 647 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 MvmtFlow 27 588 6 6 761 8 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 771 0 0 597 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 853 -989 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 -986 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 153 851 -986 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.21 0.032 -0.006 HCM Control Delay s) 34.7 9.4 0 -8.7 HCM Lane LOS D A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR* 8 1 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 15 2 15 Minor1 1451 1431 594 648 648 - 803 783 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.3 110 136 509 462 469 - 380 407 - 91 128 508 91 128 - 439 446 - 329 402 - NB 34.7 D WBT WBRSBLn1 -260 -0.227 0 -22.9 A C 0.8 SBL 6 6 0 Stop 73 0 8 Minor2 1433 779 654 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 113 392 459 104 104 373 423 SB 22.9 C SBT * 3 3 0 Stop 2042 AM -With Project 06/28/2022 SBR 34 34 0 Stop -None 0 0 73 0 4 1430 779 651 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 136 409 468 128 128 404 445 73 0 47 767 6.2 3.3 405 404 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Manono Street/Lihiwai Street & Route 19 �Mamalahoa Hi9hwal� ,> -+ • • +-'-' t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations 1'j tt 7' 1'j tt 7' 1'j � Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 742 505 65 780 9 321 54 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 742 505 65 780 9 321 54 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 102 789 537 71 848 10 369 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 Cap, veh/h 294 1354 595 253 1344 598 472 297 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.19 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1572 1810 3610 1606 1810 930 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 789 537 71 848 10 369 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1791 1572 1810 1805 1606 1810 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 15.3 28.2 2.1 16.8 0.3 14.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 15.3 28.2 2.1 16.8 0.3 14.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 294 1354 595 253 1344 598 472 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.58 0.90 0.28 0.63 0.02 0.78 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 322 1354 595 271 1344 598 543 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 17.2 21.6 25.6 16.8 22.5 17.3 23.0 0.0 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 1.8 19.5 0.6 2.3 0.1 6.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 6.4 13.3 0.9 7.1 0.1 6.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.9 23.5 45.1 17.4 24.7 17.4 29.4 0.0 LnGre LOS B C D B C B C A Approach Vol, veh/h 1428 929 484 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.2 24.1 27.6 Approach LOS C C C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 38.0 7.3 32.8 9.6 37.5 21.6 18.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 33.0 5.0 47.0 6.0 32.0 20.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.1 30.2 3.0 6.2 5.0 18.8 16.1 12.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 4.8 0.4 1.2 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.1 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline 2042 PM -With Project � NBR 46 46 0 1.00 1.00 1870 53 0.87 2 254 0.32 795 115 1725 4.2 4.2 0.46 550 0.21 929 1.00 1.00 21.7 0.2 0.0 1.7 21.9 C 06/28/2022 '. +� SBL SBT SB. 1'j � 21 70 97 21 70 97 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1900 1885 26 88 121 0.80 0.80 0.80 0 0 1 333 113 155 0.03 0.16 0.16 1810 723 994 26 0 209 1810 0 1717 1.0 0.0 10.2 1.0 0.0 10.2 1.00 0.58 333 0 268 0.08 0.00 0.78 388 0 629 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 29.6 0.0 35.4 0.1 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 4.6 29.7 0.0 40.3 C A D 235 39.2 D Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2042 PM -With Project -Rt 11 and Piilani Acceleration Lane Modeled 2: Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway) & Piilani Street 06/28/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.2 Movement EBL EBR Lane Configurations V Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 116 Future Vol, veh/h 8 116 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 MvmtFlow 10 143 Ma'or/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1566 648 Stage 1 1274 Stage 2 292 Critical Hdwy 6.25 7.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.6 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 3.65 3.93 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 130 352 Stage 1 170 Stage 2 712 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 61 352 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 61 Stage 1 80 Stage 2 712 roach EB HCM Control Delay, s 34.7 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL Capacity (veh/h) 276 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.528 HCM Control Delay s) 31.7 HCM Lane LOS D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.9 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT SBT SBR � tt tttt 134 0 1127 40 134 0 1127 40 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free -None -None 425 0 0 0 0 92 92 90 90 4 3 3 0 146 0 1252 44 Ma'or1 Ma'or2 1296 0 0 5.38 3.14 276 276 NB SB 31.7 0 NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR-269 -0.569-34.7 D 3.2 Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6thAWSC 3: Manono Street & Piilani Street 2042 PM -With Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 4: Manono Street & Kekuanaoa Street .J-� • 'f � '- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations "'i +r "'i +rTraffic Volume (veh/h) 108 541 61 95 442 39Future Volume (veh/h) 108 541 61 95 442 39Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 1900 Ad' Flow Rate, veh/h 114 569 64 100 465 41 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 0 1 0 0 Cap, veh/h 312 665 570 239 676 570 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1870 1603 1795 1900 1603 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 114 569 64 100 465 41 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1870 1603 1795 1900 1603 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 25.4 2.4 3.1 18.8 1.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 25.4 2.4 3.1 18.8 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 312 665 570 239 676 570 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.86 0.11 0.42 0.69 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 312 665 570 239 676 570 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay {d), s/veh 18.9 26.9 19.5 20.6 24.7 19.2 Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 13.3 0.4 5.3 5.7 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1 .7 13.1 0.9 1.6 9.1 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.2 40.2 19.9 25.9 30.4 19.4 LnGre LOS C D B C C B Approach Vol, veh/h 747 606 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.7 28.9 Approach LOS D C imer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), t0.0 33.0 10.0 37.0 10.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax�.S 28.0 5.0 32.0 5.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1ey,3; 17.0 5.1 27.4 3.6 24.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summa!1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.4 HCM 6th LOS C 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline � t I" NBL NBT NBR "'i ft 46 279 48 46 279 48 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1900 1870 1841 50 303 52 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 2 4 235 484 83 0.06 0.31 0.31 1810 1555 267 50 0 355 1810 0 1821 1.6 0.0 15.0 1.6 0.0 15.0 1.00 0.15 235 0 567 0.21 0.00 0.63 235 0 567 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 21.6 0.0 26.5 2.1 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 7.0 23.6 0.0 31.7 C A C 405 30.7 C 7 8 10.0 37.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 32.0 5.6 20.8 0.0 2.2 '. ! SBL SBT "'i � 93 374 93 374 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1885 1900 98 394 0.95 0.95 1 0 329 458 0.06 0.31 1795 1471 98 0 1795 0 3.3 0.0 3.3 0.0 1.00 329 0 0.30 0.00 329 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 20.5 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 22.8 0.0 C A 589 41.1 D 2042 PM -With Project � SBR 92 92 0 1.00 1.00 1900 97 0.95 0 113 0.31 362 491 1833 22.7 22.7 0.20 570 0.86 570 1.00 1.00 29.2 15.6 0.0 11.9 44.8 D 06/28/2022 Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Mililani Street & Kekuanaoa Street Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations * * Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 696 16 4 579 9 Future Vol, veh/h 20 696 16 4 579 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 6 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 21 725 17 4 597 9 Ma'or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Conflicting Flow All 608 0 0 743 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -4.1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 Pot CaR::1 Maneuver 980 -873 - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 978 -872 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 - Stage 2 - roach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 258 978 -872 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 0.021 -0.005 HCM Control Delay s) 20.6 8.8 0 -9.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 0 5:00 pm 03/22/2022 Baseline NBL NBT NBR * 1 4 14 1 4 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop -None 0 0 68 68 68 0 0 7 1 6 21 Minor1 1418 1393 735 777 777 - 641 616 - 7.1 6.5 6.27 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 3.5 4 3.363 116 143 411 393 410 - 466 485 - 97 136 411 97 136 - 378 394 - 404 481 - NB 20.6 C WBT WBRSBLn1 -440 -0.142 0 -14.5 A B 0.5 SBL 0 0 0 Stop 72 0 0 Minor2 1401 612 789 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 119 484 387 105 105 465 349 SB 14.5 B SBT * 2 2 0 Stop 2042 PM -With Project 06/28/2022 SBR 43 43 0 Stop -None 0 0 72 72 0 5 3 60 1397 604 612 785 6.5 6.25 5.5 5.5 4 3.345 142 493 487 407 135 492 135 483 392 Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Appendix G -Analysis Report Future With Mitigation �,a �\JSpack SOLUTIONS Project Name: Project/File#: Scenario: tD Roundabout Capacity Analysis HCM 6th Edition Methodology Manono Street at Piilani Street HCM 6th Edition -2042 AM W Project olume Inputs and Roundabout Flows Manono Street LJ □ □ D 0 d] � � � LJ 95 I� � 107 I <===i <===i 'a, 01 �ll 0� :;; 0 � ·c:291 c::D-1} � a: 231 c=> c=> 181 c:==:) I 7).. 101 Ped/Bike Manono Street �L!liiJL:l!.ll.!.L!ilJI :{ellhht:hTeH••• 1r:1a·a.1._""111 hhll.'.I • 1,:11 I a.:1•T�W �#•_l_••nUif:,\ Approach: Northbound Southbound Eastbound Street Name: Manono Street Manono Street Piilani Street Configuration: Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) Right Turn Bypass: No Separate Bypass No Separate Bypass No Separate Bypass Peak Hour Factor: 0.85 0.87 0.73 % Bicycles: 0% 0% 0% % Heavy Vehicles: 4% 4% 7% Adjusted Entry Flow: 428 564 97 Capacity: 1154 1172 718 v/c Ratio: 0.37 0.48 0.14 Delay (seconds/veh): 7 8 6 Level of Service {LOS): A A A 95th %ile Queue (veh): 1.7 2.7 0.5 Approach Delay: 7 Seconds/Vehicle 8 Seconds/Vehicle 6 Seconds/Vehicle Approach LOS: A A A Exit Lanes Required: Minimum 1 Exit Lane Minimum 1 Exit Lane Minimum 1 Exit Lane HCM 6th Edition Roundabout Analysis Overall Intersection Results t North Ped/Bike 21 771 401 311 � :;; 01 ·c:� a: 148 Westbound Piilani Street Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) No Separate Bypass 0.79 0% 5% 187 879 0.21 6 A 0.8 6 Seconds/Vehicle A Minimum 1 Exit Lane Average Control Delay is 7 seconds and LOS A. All Approach Lanes have a v/c ratio under 0.85. Spack Academy is part of the Spack Enterprise family of companies Mike8n SPACK traffic ACADEMY cmUN1rlNG cars.�cm � �\JSpack SOLUTIONS Project Name: Project/File#: Scenario: tD Roundabout Capacity Analysis HCM 6th Edition Methodology Manono Street at Piilani Street HCM 6th Edition -2042 PM W Project olume Inputs and Roundabout Flows Manono Street LJ □ □ D 0 d] � � � LJ 73 I� � 68 I <===i <===i 'a, 01 �ll � � :;; 0 � ·c:231 c::D-1} � a: 161 c=> c=> 181 c:==:) I 7).. 115 Ped/Bike Manono Street �L!liiJL:l!.ll.!.L!ilJI :{ellhht:hTeH••• 1r:1a·a.1._""111 hhll.'.I • 1,:11 I a.:1•T�W �#•_l_••nUif:,\ Approach: Northbound Southbound Eastbound Street Name: Manono Street Manono Street Piilani Street Configuration: Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) Right Turn Bypass: No Separate Bypass No Separate Bypass No Separate Bypass Peak Hour Factor: 0.94 0.93 0.77 % Bicycles: 0% 0% 0% % Heavy Vehicles: 1% 0% 0% Adjusted Entry Flow: 428 628 74 Capacity: 1198 1260 718 v/c Ratio: 0.36 0.50 0.10 Delay (seconds/veh): 6 8 6 Level of Service {LOS): A A A 95th %ile Queue (veh): 1.6 2.9 0.3 Approach Delay: 6 Seconds/Vehicle 8 Seconds/Vehicle 6 Seconds/Vehicle Approach LOS: A A A Exit Lanes Required: Minimum 1 Exit Lane Minimum 1 Exit Lane Minimum 1 Exit Lane HCM 6th Edition Roundabout Analysis Overall Intersection Results t North Ped/Bike 21 771 231 391 � :;; 01 ·c:� a: 159 Westbound Piilani Street Left/Thru/Right {1 lane) No Separate Bypass 0.85 0% 1% 164 920 0.18 6 A 0.6 6 Seconds/Vehicle A Minimum 1 Exit Lane Average Control Delay is 7 seconds and LOS A. All Approach Lanes have a v/c ratio under 0.85. Spack Academy is part of the Spack Enterprise family of companies Mike8n SPACK traffic ACADEMY cmUN1rlNG cars.�cm FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PI'ILANI SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSE Appendix E Comments in Response to Early Consultation OMITTED, NON APPLICABLE CSFSCS Project Number 2908-CIA-l Appendix F A CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 525 PI'ILANI STREET WAIAKEA AHUPUA'A, SOUTH HILO DISTRICT, ISLAND OF HAW AI'I [TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011] Prepared By: Glenn G. Escott, M.A. SEPTEMBER 2023 Prepared For: Talon Properties, LLC 3333 East Camelback Rd STE 275 Phoenix, AZ 85018-2386 Sc1Drr1nc CoNSULTANT SERVICES Jnc. 1357 Kapi'olani Boulevard, Suite 900 Honolulu, HI 96814 a13ooome. l94ooome. 2Q6000mE. 21sooome. 2JQOOOmE. 242ooome. 254ooome. 266000mE. 279ooome. 29oooome, WGS84 Zone SQ l21 OOOm E. E S84 Zone 4Q s 16ooom E. � !I.� 10- <HAWAII COt ,._ ... , .,.,-..(' l\ul� 195000mf. 2Q]OOOmf. 219ooomf. 2J}OOOmf. 243000mE, 255ooomf, 257000mE. 279000mf. 291000mE. 3QJOOOmf. 319000mf. 0 S 10 U 20 :Umtlts 10 IS 20 ll 30 35 JO km E E N N ,./ t ,;;: ll • KAWl!:LOLANI , .-._ �-a,•Jtof> e./-. i t:3o.••of (t:t:,.0<>0,f) ./ r1-114-�,i,,. .r.,,,..,vood, li',;.)I,, t'At. ""40:� State of Haw ii WK,V < (,"" ii 3/ 13 0 I Gr. ��78 I l!_ __ � __ J KEY □ -PROJECT AREA 50 100 meters ..$rl•lo t1/ Ha,u1ii (Covm'r ,::,( HaNall) HooLuLu 150 I-! €1 *U •• rfl .:Jl.>I• •I'" H•-•#;• ,e_,,�j, ,,; 1-16-•u) ��"6-. DNI L,� Figure 3: Portion of TMK: (3) 2-2-033 Map Showing Project Area Location (County ofHawai'i Planning 3 METHODOLOGY This Cultural Impact Assessment was prepared in accordance with the methodology and content protocol provided in the Guidelines for Assessing Cultural Impacts (OEQC 1997). In outlining the "Cultural Impact Assessment Methodology", the OEQC states: .. .information may be obtained through scoping, community meetings, ethnographic interviews and oral histories ... (1997). The report contains archival and documentary research, as well as communication with organizations having knowledge of the project area, its cultural resources, and its practices and beliefs. This Cultural Impact Assessment was prepared in accordance with the methodology and content protocol provided in the Guidelines for Assessing Cultural Impacts (OEQC 1997). The assessment concerning cultural impacts should address, but not be limited to, the following matters: (1)a discussion of the methods applied and results of consultation with individuals and organizations identified by the preparer as being familiar with culturalpractices and features associated with the project area, including any constraintsof limitations with might have affected the quality of the information obtained; (2)a description of methods adopted by the preparer to identify, locate, and select the persons interviewed, including a discussion of the level of effort undertaken; (3)ethnographic and oral history interview procedures, including the circumstancesunder which the interviews were conducted, and any constraints or limitationswhich might have affected the quality of the information obtained; (4)biographical information concerning the individuals and organizations consulted,their particular expertise, and their historical and genealogical relationship to theproject area, as well as information concerning the persons submitting information or interviewed, their particular knowledge and cultural expertise, if any, and their historical and genealogical relationship to the project area; ( 5)a discussion concerning historical and cultural source materials consulted, theinstitutions and repositories searched, and the level of effort undertaken, as well as the particular perspective of the authors, if appropriate, any opposing views, and any other relevant constraints, limitations or biases; ( 6)a discussion concerning the cultural resources, practices and beliefs identified,and for the resources and practices, their location within the broad geographical area in which the proposed action is located, as well as their direct or indirect significance or connection to the project site; 6 (7)a discussion concerning the nature of the cultural practices and beliefs, and thesignificance of the cultural resources within the project area, affected directly or indirectly by the proposed project; (8)an explanation of confidential information that has been withheld from publicdisclosure in the assessment; (9)a discussion concerning any conflicting information in regard to identified cultural resources, practices and beliefs; (10)an analysis of the potential effect of any proposed physical alteration on culturalresources, practices or beliefs; the potential of the proposed action to isolate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting; and the potential of the proposed action to introduce elements which may alter the setting in whichcultural practices take place, and; (11)the inclusion of bibliography of references, and attached records of interviews, which were allowed to be disclosed. Based on the inclusion of the above information, assessments of the potential effects on cultural resources in the project area and recommendations for mitigation of these effects can be proposed. ARCHIVAL RESEARCH Archival research focused on a historical documentary study involving both published and unpublished sources. These included legendary accounts of native and early foreign writers; early historical journals and narratives; historic maps and land records such as Land Commission Awards, Royal Patent Grants, and Boundary Commission records; historic accounts, and previous archaeological project reports. INTERVIEW METHODOLOGY Interviews are conducted in accordance with applicable state laws and guidelines. Individuals and/or groups who have knowledge of traditional practices and beliefs associated with a project area or who know of historical properties within a project area are sought for consultation. Individuals who have particular knowledge of traditions passed down from preceding generations and a personal familiarity with the project area are invited to share their relevant information. Often people are recommended for their expertise, and indeed, organizations, such as Hawaiian Civic Clubs, the Island Branch of Office of Hawaiian Affairs, historical societies, Island Trail 7 1 -.. ,,. ··--'I - .. 6.-L' ....... ...,. ... ..I 5 ,,,-: $ +\ 5 6 0 See. i] Figure 5: Portion of 1825 Map of Hilo Bay and Project Area Location (Malden 1825). 15 five ahupua 'a ( administrative divisions under konohiki control) that included, from west to east, Pi'ihonua, Punahoa 1 s1, Punahoa 2nd, Ponahawai, Kiikiiau, and Waiakea. From a traditional Hawaiian cultural point of view, the ahupua 'a can be understood as a most basic land-use unit. Families and individuals felt they were deeply connected to the ahupua 'a that they lived within (Handy and Handy 1972:42). There was not so much a sense that people owned the land, but that people belonged to the land in which they lived and had a responsibility to nurture it. It was this deep connection to the land that informed each individual's right to collect the produce of their ahupua 'a. Each ahupua 'a was administered by a konohiki, or lesser chief-landlord who was subject to an ali 'i 'ai ahupua 'a, or the chief who controlled the resources of an ahupua 'a (Maly and Maly 2001 :7). The maka 'iiinana tended the fields and collected the abundance of their ahupua 'a for their own needs, as well as those of the konohiki and the ali 'i. Those who lived in each ahupua 'a had claim to the differing resources from all elevations of their ahupua 'a. The timing of planting and harvesting, the timing and quotas for fishing, the religious rituals and ceremonies that promoted the abundance of natural resources, and the cultural mores that laid out how food was distributed to all members of Hawaiian society were regulated by traditional cultural and religious practices so that all members of each ahupua 'a shared in the bounty of the ahupua 'a. The natural environment and resources within the ahupua 'a were imbued with sacredness and were the focus of the traditional Hawaiian religious and social practices (Maly and Maly 2001:5). Many of the religious rituals, practices, and ceremonies were centered on maintaining the fertility and abundance of the natural resources. "The significance of rituals and ceremonial observances in cultivation and indeed in all aspects oflife was of great importance to the well-being of the ancient Hawaiians, and cannot be over-emphasized, or overlooked when viewing traditional sites of the cultural landscape" (Maly and Maly 2001 :6). HILO BAY AREA HEIAU There were several heiau that once existed in Hilo (Figure 6). The heiau were wholly or partially destroyed during the Historic era and their exact locations are no longer known. Several of the heiau were luakini class or po 'okanaka class heiau 17 .- � • 11 ' I',,, d�u I 1) . '( I }J f, I ..... , .. ,,,���-'.t-17 .--., � ...... Pl'OPl'O BOUNDARY .....,..,t!>:!!-"':'!i.lt!_ -� , .. c.,,r rr1,, rv .... .,. ... , .. ,v· /} -I I . / I PROJECT �REA ---�'"-j iv VER �£ { �!,. \\ ,>-J"0'1· - W.D Alexander .I I-IiiO I -TQWN .. AND VICINITY lap ftnd urYev by E.D. Baldwin Pclll o ' lion °fhm·1 �,1 n arral' '\-Vainaku 'Map. 0 I I Sce:e I 2 DO 200 400 600 800 l<onoh,k, Lands r==::J Covemment do C.:=:::l Crown do r==::J C,own Sain r==::J L.C.Aw.,d, c::=::::i � feet 1 Figure 7: Portion of Hilo Town and Vicinity Map Showing Locations of Project Area, the 'Iii Kiipono of Pi'opi'o, and Neighboring Fishponds (Baldwin 1891). 21 ........_ HI LO ... ...• . ...... : . ·, ..\ 11 I L 0 ....... ......... ·······,...... ..··--· •····. ... . . .... ...... . Figure 8: Fishponds Identified by Kikuchi (1973:33). 22 0 WAIAKEA D PROJECT AREA 0.1 0.2 ., 0.3 m1e 0.4 K) 0.5 Prior to the Mahele, Waiakea Ahupua' a belonged to King Kamehameha I, then Lihiliho, and was later held by the chiefess Ka-unu-o-hua, granddaughter of Keawe-mau hili (Kelly et al. 1981 :40). Waiakea Ahupua'a became Crown Lands during the Mahele of 1848 and was awarded to Victoria Kamamalu (Princess Ka'ahumanu IV), with the exception of kuleana awards made to others, and later became part of Bishop Estate lands. In the following years, at least twenty-five LCAs were awarded along the Wailoa River north and northwest of the current project area (Table 1 and Figure 9). The largest LC award was LCA 7713, Apana 16 to Victoria Kamamalu which was the 'iii kupono of Pi'opi'o, with the exception of kuleana awards made to others, and totaled 44.15 acres. The remaining LCAs ranged in size from 0.80 to 13.40 acres and the average size was 5.25 acres. Many of the awards were for fenced/enclosed lands with houses, cultivated fields and small gardens. For their part in aiding King Kamehameha, he gave John Young the ahupua 'a of Kuk:uau 1 and he gave the ahupua 'a of Kuk:uau 2 to Isaac Davis (Kelly et al. 1981: 11 ). Twenty five small claims were awarded to native claimants in the coastal lands of both ahupua'a. The ahupua 'a of Ponahawai was given by King Kamehameha I to Keawe-a Heulu, one of his trusted warriors (Kelly et al. 1981 :40). At the start of the Mahele, Ponahawai was given up by Keawe-a-Heulu's nephew Kinimaka. The ahupua 'a became Crown Lands and then Government Lands during the Mahele. In the following years, 25 small Land Commission Awards (LCA) were awarded within the ahupua 'a. Pi'ihonua Ahupua'a belong to King Kamehameha I prior to the Mahele. It was given to Ka-lae-oke-koi by Kamehameha III or Boki in 1828 (Kelly et al. 1981 :40). Punahoa 2nd Ahupua'a was given to the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM) by Queen Ka'ahumanu during the Mahele (Kelly et al. 1981:39). Numerous small LCAs were awarded in the coastal lands of both ahupua 'a. The project area parcels are not associated with any LCA. The Hilo Bay area was the seat of government for Hawai'i Island. Princess Ruth Ke'elikolani was the governor of Hawaii Island and had a house near the beach at Hilo Bay (See Figure 9, LCA 1279). She was a staunch defender of Hawaiian culture and Hilo. 26 o .... ae and UI' y by E.D. Baldwin 1S8l Konoh,k1 Lends Government do Crown • do. Crown Sales L.C.Awa,ds C,-ents. Martha Davis 1905D • Kilauea Ho _, 1900 Wharf Shipwreck Railro d The government initiated construction in 1897 of a larger wharf just north of Reed's Landing known as the Government Ship Wharf (Kelly et al. 1981: 107). Soon thereafter plans were made to increase the size of the wharf (Kelly et al. 1981: 178), but efforts quickly changed to construction of the "railroad wharf' just to the south (over old Reed's Landing). The railroad wharf was completed in 1893, and after that this "new railroad wharf accommodated all vessels coming into Hilo Harbor" (Kelly et al. 1981: 178). During this period larger steam vessels with deeper drafts were rapidly replacing sailing ships. Many large steam ships could not be accommodated by the railroad wharf. By 1909 the only workable wharves were the railroad wharf and the territorial wharf [the Government Wharf], which was in "a condition of decay and beyond repair" (Kelly et al. 1981:184). And by this time the breakwater at Hilo Bay was under construction. The old government wharf was finally removed in February, 1912 (Kelly et al. 1981 :185). Simultaneously, a considerable effort was expended to building a new wharf that would eventually become known as Kuhio Wharf. By 1916 Kuhio Wharf was busy to capacity. A detailed map of the proposed developments at Kuhio Wharf in 1926 indicates that the railroad landing near Ohele had been abandoned by that time (Figure 84 in Kelly et al. 1981:201 ). Based on available maps, the railroad landing was abandoned sometime between 1907 and 1921. Sampans were a major water going vessel after their inauguration in 1910 (Warshauer 2004b ). They were docked along the east boundary of the project area and beyond to the south along the Wailoa River. They were repaired, however, by bringing them out of the water along a short "rail line" just to the north of the project area (H. Yada interview). The sampan was hauled out of the water along this rail line using pulleys and winches, and repaired on the land just north of the eastern side of the project area. Only one of the wharves at Hilo Bay was directly within the project area: Spencer's Landing. The precise location is for this landing is not provided on any maps, due to its early demise. There were various constructions at the landing: stone house, stone pier, bridge elements. A rather unique aspect of the stone structures there is that "the stone used for construction of Spencer's Landing were gathered from the Mokuola (Coconut Island) heiau" (Ecklund 1940, in Kelly et al. 1981:97). Stones presumed to have been taken from the heiau to build the tsunami-destroyed landing were photographed by Theo. Kelsey circa 1920 (see Kelly et al. 1981:98, Figure 32). 34 There were two shipwrecks along the coast north of the project area (Rogers 1999:115- 116). The Martha Davis (Figure 11) caught fire in 1905 just offshore from Reed's Landing, just beyond the project area. The S.S. Kilauea Hou was forced onto the beach at Kanukuokamanu in 1900 (Figure 12). The 119 foot long vessel was left to rot there, and "In April of 1904, an attempt was made by R.T. guard, by means of a winch and giant powder, to loosen the boilers of the wrecked Kilauea Hou, which had been lying in the sand on the beach for three years" (Rogers 1999:115). BUILDINGS Hilo Iron Works building and railroad spur was built and began operations in 1913 (Warshauer 2003:28). Two acres of"swamp land" was sucked up from the Wailoa River into molds to pour concrete as foundations for expanding the Iron Works in 1919. The building that still stands today was built in 1935. The foundry at the Iron Works closed in 1958. Other fabrication continued there until finally closing completely in 1983. Many buildings once existed just to the north of the project area. Residences and small businesses associated with the Japanese American enclave here situated along Kamehameha Avenue during much of the area in the first half of the 20th century (Figure 13). Those were destroyed in the tsunami of 1946. Subsequent to the 1946 tsunami, industrial buildings were erected in this area (Figure 14). Those buildings were destroyed in the 1960 tsunami (Figure 15). Some of the area west of the project area was not built on during the "Shinmachi Era", or the subsequent "Industrial Era" of use here. The park-like setting of some of the eastern edge of the shoreline seems to have been maintained throughout these developments. However, much of that area was modified during the raising of the land for the railroad, and paving for the various roads and bridges that were built and destroyed there. The project area (Parcel 011) is depicted on the 1932 TKM (3) 2-2-033 map as portions of former ( canceled) Parcels O 12, 019 and 020 ( see Figure 3 ). The northern portion (Parcel 12) was Land Grant 13431 made to Hilo Electric Light Company, Ltd (Figure 16). The south and middle portions of Parcel 011 was Land Grant 11489 made to Ruddle Sales and Services Company, Ltd (Fukuya and Yonamine 1954). Parcel 013 was surveyed and recorded in 1953 (C.S.F 11633) and is labeled CSF 11633 on the Wailoa Park River Park map of 1954 (Fukuya and Yonamine 1954) and "Government Land" on the Wailoa Park River Park map of 1978 (Sakamoto and Kurosaki 1978). Aerial photographs of the project area taken in the 1950s and 35 . 7 •. ...... ,,.,11,,:,011 � •+-·,. II \ '°· I fl 11 f1 .14 14 • • . • . 1,,,-..---....._�..._ -•• � ·:/'· ·&' �·:.�� II 11 Iii ...,, ,, ,. .. 1 (9 ,. 11 14 f1 .()' rr If � � (1 .I/ JO 20 •i ,II IT r7 � II II 2C> 4 ·� f1 ·�.. ., 14 ,c, • '<-••.; 11 ' "' 1l 16 r� .. ., .-,,..__,� 1'5 I!> 14 � .,, c• • � ...,_ •=--.-' tl .. .f"' 7 ._..,, ,,..-/.' ���£�:;:����::::=;-. :?:-� 'tf:( ·,i , ,. .. �r<'. -.f . Figure 13: 1932 Map of Hilo Bay Showing Industrial Buildings Along Coast and Project Area Outlined R 38 ,, I\ I\ \\ ---\\ ----------rt ..,.,ide) ___ __ KEY □-PROJECT AREA� TN\ WAILOAPOND Figure 16: Portion ofWailoa Park River Park Map (Fukuya and Yonamine 1954). 41 -,.. < 0 E C L • > � 1960s show industrial buildings, likely warehouses, constructed on the project area lot and on Parcel 013 (see Figure 14 and Figure 15). Ruddle Sales and Services Company, Ltd sold automobiles, automobile parts and tires (The Star of Hawaii October 19, 1938). The warehouses on Parcel 011 and Parcel 013 were removed in the early 1990s (Haun and Henry 2021 :27). CANOEING IN THE 20™ CENTURY Canoe racing was "revived" in 1952 with the implementation of the "Julian R. Yates Hawaiian Canoe Racing Championships" in Kailua (Anonymous 2002). Prior to that Julian Yates had staged "regattas" along the Kona coast in the 1930's. Honolulu teams routinely were victorious in those regattas until Mr. Yates began more rigorous training and practicing with paddlers from Miloli'i to Kailua. Kona based teams began winning more often. Subsequent to that, regattas began to be conducted in Hilo Bay. Local, statewide, and international canoe regattas are now regularly held at Hilo Bay. The canoe houses at Hilo Bay are located near the eastern end of the project area. THE CHANGING SHORELINE Historical maps from 1825 to 1932 indicate that the shoreline of Hilo Bay stayed the same for that 100 year period. Sometime between 1932 and 1951, the shoreline in the eastern part of Hilo Bay began to advance into the bay. This initial encroachment occurred around the drainage ditch (Figure 16), so it is possible that the drainage ditch is responsible for this land migration outward into the ocean. By 1960, the shoreline has moved outward along a much wider area. SURFING IN HILO BAY Surfing is an ancient Hawaiian pastime conducted by ali 'i and maka 'ainana (Finney and Houston 1966). "Sometimes the greater part of the inhabitants of a village go out to this sport, when the wind blows fresh towards the shore, and spend the greater part of the day in the water. All ranks and ages appear equally fond of it" (Ellis 1969:371). Hilo Bay was a popular place to surf during ancient times. There are several surf breaks at Hilo Bay. The documents that provide information on where those spots were located (Finney 1959; Finney and Houston 1966; Kelly et al. 1981) provide conflicting information on this matter. Finney marked six locations gathered from four different sources in his master's thesis (Finney 1959). Kelly ( et al. 1981 :276) shows three identified along the shoreline by A. Sinoto. Wolforth (2007) documented the surf breaks at Hilo Bay based on the previous authors' work (Table 3). 42 Table 3: Surf Breaks at Hilo Bay. From Kelly From Finney (1959) et al. (1981) Independent Assessment Surf name Reference (from A. Full Reference Description Same as Sinoto) Ahua Thrum Ahua ( off Coconut Island) (1896:113) Huia I'i I'i (1959:134) "Piihonua has one, Pi'ihonua named Huia" Kaipalaoa Beckwith Bay Front I'i (1959:134) Huia (1919:504) Ka-nuku-o-ka-manu I'i I'i (1959:134) Pi'ihonua I'i I'i (1959:134) "Pi'ihonua has one, Huia named Huia" Pua'o M.Pukui*No known I'i (1959:134) "There is also the (near Wailuku name surf at Paula at River) Puueo"** I'i (1959:134) "Punahoa has one" *Finney (1959) cites M. Pukui as a source for some surflocations, then Pukui et al. (1974) cites Finney andHouston (1966) as a source for those same surflocations. Consequently, the origin of this information is not clear. ** Pua'o in Pukui, Elbert and Mookini (1974:191) is described as an, "Ancient surfing area, Ka-laupapa, north Moloka'i (Finney and Houston 1966: 30)". Indeed, Finney corrected this between the time of presenting it in his 1959 master's thesis, and publishing with Houston in 1966. However, there is a Paula at Pu'ueo (l'i 1959:134) that is not listed in Finney and Houston (1966:26). Pi'ihonua is a very "thin" ahupua 'a. It is approximately 170 meters wide (550 feet). Kaipalaoa is within Pi'ihonua. Consequently, it is very likely that there is only one surf place within Pi'ihonua, and this is the one referred to as Kaipalaoa by Beckwith (1970). I'i (1959:134) is clear that the one in Pi'ihonua is called Huia. Based on this, it appears that the three places identified by Finney (1959) as "Huia", "Kaipalaoa", and "Pi'ihonua", and that Kelly (et al. 1981 :276) refers to as "Bay Front", are different names for one surfing location that is near the mouth of the Wailuku River, at Kaipalaoa Point in Pi'ihonua ahupua 'a. Next to Pi'ihonua to the east is the ahupua 'a of Punahoa. It, too, is a thin ahupua 'a, approximately 170 meters wide. It is conceivable that the surf at Huia rolls into Punahoa. In contrast, I'i (1959:134) clearly distinguishes Punahoa from Pi'ihonua in his list of surfing spots. 44 Further support for the distinction of the two places comes from one of the legends of Hilo: the story of the daughters ofHina and their bid to save the people from famine. There are several versions of this complex story that includes, among other things, places of springs in Hilo (Beckwith 1970; Kelsey 1926; Pukui 1995; Westervelt 1977), but one version includes a reference to surfing. The precise location of this spot is given in reference to one of the many springs that (daughter) Hina had created during her mythical movements underground. Diving for the last time she came to the surface in the spring ofHina-au-au-wai at the foot of Haili street just above the present track (on John Kai's boundary) a little to the side toward Hamakua from where water now flows into the sea. Below the tracks and a few yards to the north was an ancient place for hauling up canoes (kau lana waa) named Ka pali iki (the little cliff), a large rock now covered with sand where women of old gathered moss and shell-fish. It is said by one informant that this represents the surfboard of Hina who rode the waves in the early morning returning to the imu [Kelsey 1926]. This precisely described location is in Punahoa ahupua 'a. This reference to a goddess surfing in Hilo Bay appears to support the notion that there is a surf in Punahoa that is separate from the surf in nearby Pi'ihonua. The surfing spot called Pa'ula is interesting, because it is identified by I'i (1959:134) and Pukui et al. (1974:181), but not by Finney (1959). Nor do Pukui et al. (1974) provide a reference for their information, but they do add that, "Queen Lili'u-o-ka-lani planted seaweed here" (Pukui et al. 1974:181). Based on the available information, it appears that the historical references identify five surfing spots in Hilo Bay between Pu 'ueo and Coconut Island ( others occur outside the breakwater, and just to the north of Hilo Bay) (Figure 17). These are (from west to east around the arc of Hilo Bay): 1.Pa'ula at Pu'ueo 2.Hiua, also known as Kaipalaoa, also known as Bay Front, at Pi'ihonua 3."No name" at Punahoa at Ka pali iki 4.Kanukuokamanu at the mouth of the Wailoa River 5.Ahua at Coconut Island 45 Kanukuokaman nahoa \ 280□□om E. 281 ooom E. 282□□om E. WGS84 Zone SQ 284C z�=Rh���9�:5\l�-��=====4=�-----,-C1-��=-- E 0 0 0 fri Ca;�t-.,-:,:.1.....:......-4-��M:!,-l N z E 0 0 0 ...... CX) ,-l "' 2aoooom E. 2a1oo□mE. 2a2ooom E. 0 .5 1 MILE 0 1® FE.ET O 500 1000 METERS F3 &3 F3 I f--3 f--3 F---3 f--3 E-i-3 D Project Area Rechtman 2009 D Haun & Henry 2021 WGS84 Zone SQ 2a4c Figure 19: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area and Previous Ai (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). 49 Last First Name Organization Responded Project Area Name Knowledee Nelsen Trask Lakea Waiakea Ahupua' a Crown Land Yes Yes Heirs Vicente Dwight Hawai'i Resident Yes Some In his telephone call, Mr. Dwight Vicente stated that the United States (U.S.) federal government and Hawai'i State government lack legal jurisdiction to conduct property review processes due to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom in 1893. Hawai'i was granted protectorate status only under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, even though that ordinance only refers to lands of the continental United States of America. Furthermore, there are no articles in the U.S. Constitution annul the Hawaiian Kingdom and/or grant the U.S. governance over the lands of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Mr. Vicente stated that the Hawaiian Kingdom still exists because the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875, as amended 1887, was never abrogated and it was affirmed several times, including in Article 94 of the Constitution of the Republic ofHawai'i and in the 1898 Treaty of Annexation by the Republic ofHawai'i and the U.S. Congress. Mr. Vicente stated that only the Hawaiian Kingdom has legal jurisdiction over land review. Over the course of two meetings (January 14 and 31, 2022), Waiakea Ahupua'a Crown Land Heirs members Ms.Terri Napeahi, Mr. Iokepa Kaolulo Kaeo and Mr. Lakea Trask provided mana 'o concerning the development of the current project and future projects in the wider region of Hilo. In general the members stated that their vision for Hilo is to see the restoration of pre-Contact era traditional Hawaiian cultural sites. In addition, development projects should strive to incorporate past cultural sites and cultural practices, including heiau and gardens, into their planning designs. The Hilo Bay area was once an agricultural cornucopia with numerous agricultural heiau and gardens that sustained the people that lived there. These are the traditional cultural features that that make the Hilo Bay area historically and culturally unique. Historical and cultural sites and practices provide educational opportunities that residents can be proud of and that residents and visitors can be proud of, can learn from and can enjoy as well. Ms. Napeahi's 'ohana were awarded a kuleana property, LCA 2603, during the Mahele (see Table 1 and Figure 9). The property is located 300 meters north of the proposed skate park 51 Handy, E.S.C., and E.G. Handy 1972 Native Planters in Old Hawai'i. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Haun, A., and D. Henry 2021 Draft Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: (3) 2-2-033:013, Waiakea Ahupua 'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai 'i. Haun & Associates Report #1679-082021 prepared for Bow Engineering & Development, Inc. Honolulu. Hawai'i County Planning Department 2015 Hawai 'i County TMK Maps. http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/taxmaps/ current. Henry, Teuira and Others I'i, J.P. 1995 Voyaging Chiefs of Havai 'i. Kalamuku Press, Honolulu. 1959 Fragments of Hawaiian History. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Kahn, J., Rieth, P. Kirch, J. Athens, and G. Murakami 2014 Re-dating of the Kuli'ou'ou rockshelter, O'ahu, Hawai'i: Location of the first radiocarbon date from the Pacific Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 123(1):67-90. Kalakaua, D. l 990 The Legends and Myths of Hawai 'i. Mutual Publishing. Honolulu. Kam, W. 1983 Kamakau, S. 1961 Unrecorded Heiau on State Lands, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai 'i. Historic Sites Section, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu. Ruling Chiefs of Hawai 'i. The Kamehameha School Press. Honolulu. 1976 The Works of the People of Old. B.P. Bishop Museum Special Publication No. 61. B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. 1992 Ruling Chiefs of Hawai 'i. The Kamehameha School Press. Honolulu. Kame'eleihiwa, L. 1992 Native Land and Foreign Desires: Pehea La E Pono Ai? Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu. Kaau'a, J. 2002 The Aunties. Tribune-Herald Pullout: 2002 State Canoe Racing Championships, page 6, Hilo. 57 Malden, C.R. 1825 Map of Hilo Bay. Malo, D. 1951 Hawaiian Antiquities. Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu. Maly, K. and 0. Maly 2001 He Wahi Mo 'olelo No Na 'Aina, A Me Na Ala Hele I Hehi 'Ia, Mai Keauhou A I Kealakekua, Ma Kona, Hawai 'i (A Historical Overview of the Lands, And Trails Traveled, Between Keauhou and Kealakekua, Kona, Hawai 'i. Ku.mu Pono and Associates report prepared for Na Ala Hele Program Manager (Hawai'i Island), State Division of Forestry and Wildlife, Hilo. 2004 Ka Hana Lawai 'i A Me Na Kai 'Ewalu. Ku.mu Pono Associates report prepared for the Nature Conservancy, Honolulu, HI. McEldowney, H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawaii, Department of Anthropology, Bishop Museum. Prepared for the U.S. Army Engineer District, Pacific Ocean. Mulrooney, M, S. Bickler, M. Allen, and T. Ladefoged 2011 High-precision dating of colonization and settlement in East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:E192-E194. National Geographic, Topo! 2003 Seamless USGS Topographic Maps on CD-ROM, Hawai 'i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Washington, D.C. Nordhoff, C OEQC 1974 Northern California, Oregon, and the Sandwich Islands. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley. 2010 Office of Environmental Quality Control OEQC Bulletin. Honolulu. Pearson, R.J., P.V. Kirch, and M. Pietrusewsky 1971 An Early Prehistoric Site at Bellows Beach, Waimanalo, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania, 6:204-234. Pukui, M.K., S.H. Elbert, and E.T. Mookini 1974 Place Names of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. Pukui, M.K. with L.C.S. Green l 995 Folktales of Hawai 'i. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. 59 USCOE 1983 Reed's Bay Harbor, Hawaii: A Reevaluation Report and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Small-Craft Navigation Improvements. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pacific Ocean Division. U.S. Geological Survey 1954 Aerial Photograph ofUSGS Piihoa South Quadrangle Region. 1954 Series aerial photograph No. 1767, photographed 1954. University ofHawai'i at Manoa Library, MAGIS Aerial Photograph Collection, Aerial Photograph No. 1642. University ofHawai'i, Manoa. Waihona 'Aina 2012 Mahele online database. www.waihona.com. Warshauer, K. 2001 Destruction awaited Hilo's seaport debut. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, December 30, pages 7 and 9, Hilo. 2002a Wailoa Bridge had a long history of trouble. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, May 12, pages 17-18, Hilo. 2002b Hilo's Wailoa bridge was a costly venture. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, May 12, pages 21-22, Hilo. 2002c Rotating swing bridge survived two tsunamis. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, March 10, 21 and 23, Hilo. 2002d Hilo's railroad wharf opened in 1903. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, January 6, pages 33 and 35, Hilo. 2003a Hilo Iron Works an early steel success. Hawai'i Tribune-Herald, May 18, pages 27-28, Hilo. 2003b Some Banyan Drive Signs Need Correction. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, April 27, 2003, Hilo. 2004a Famed Trees of Banyan Drive Still Mislabeled. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, April 11, 2004, Hilo. 2004b Hilo's Wailoa River was once a busy waterway. Hawai'i Tribune-Herald, February 18 pages Fl-2, Hilo. 2005 Orchid Isle Hotel Once Stood on Banyan Drive Lot. Hawai 'i Tribune-Herald, July 25, 2005, Hilo. Westervelt, W.D. 1977 Hawaiian Historical Legends. Charles E. Tuttle Company, Rutland, Vermont. 61 APPENDIX A: THEODORE KELSEY HILO PLACE NAMES A-1 Hawai'i State Archives M86, Folder 487 Provided by Halena Kapuni-Reynolds Hawaiian Land Names, from trip with Mrs. Ka-'ouli Kaai and her brother Ka-hau-olo-pua of Keaukaha, June 25, 1925. Leaving the auto near the junction ofKalihiwai and Ka-nuku-o-ka-manu St., Waiakea, Ka-ouli and I went makai to two little coves where Ke One Wali o Ohele, where the noted sand of the stout chiefess Ohele is located (waliwali ke kino o Ohelea me na Iii wahine e a'e). Every day after riding the breakers ofKawili-Ka Nalu Ha'i o Kawili --that broke near the mouth of the Wailoa River and landing mauka, the chiefesses would lie on the sand of Ohele. Poo nahoahoa (Mr. Spencer), Mgr. of Amauulu Plantation, had a wharf running out over Ka Lae o Ohele, from which he shipped whale-oil, boiled from the blubber where the third fish-market counting from the Coconut Is. side is located. Ka Lau o Kukui is the next little point N., where Uapo Mahoe (double wharf) of the Inter Island Co. was located. When the sea was rough passengers were landed up the mouth of the river. This point was probably named because of the numerous (lau) lights of the whaleships in port. Women would put clothes in a container and swim to the ships. Hawaiians got whale-oil to burn in their lamps with wicks. Reed's Wharf ran out from where there is a square mile of concreted rock. The old Railroad wharf ran out at the end of Lau Kukui where the piles are now in the water. (Makai aku o Ohele malaila Ka-lua-aha, he uapo no ka hui o Hacif,,eld mamua. Nalimu).1 Waipahu is a little spring and cove with young hau trees at the head of it. The Lae o Waipahu is there. The spring is at the head of the cove. (Ka uapo o Waihonu makai aku o ka uapo o Ka Lau o Kukui. ka Huapala a inoa o ka uapo o Ka Lau-o-kukui). Waihonu, probably a pond for breeding turtles, had its outlet, now covered by the road, just beyond the lae of Waipahu, where there was a sluice-gate, or makaha'. Beyond is an old stone house known as Uapo Lei Lehua (o ka uapo o Wa), which used to be a wharf but now a govt. oil warehouse. 0 Kahiwa ka inoa kahiko.Nalimu We now started for the house ofKa-hau-olo-pua at Keaukaha. The place where he lives is Ka-iole-wai is so-called he says, because a rat got into a calabash of potato poi, which is left to sour for three days, and was drowned. This incident happened in the time of his father and other relatives. He says that Ke-au-kaha was so caled because only potato was raised there and that fish was exchanged for poi with Hilo Pali Ku. Ke-o-kea was named, he stated, because white hala (hala ke'oke'o---kea also means white) was made into leis and given by one sex to the other. These gifts were termed 'o', just as luncheon is called 'o'. The fruit of the hala ke' oke' o is light yellow. Maka-o-Ku was a chief. Wai opae, lake on C.I. Ku-a-ka-ananuu (I received the name Kua-a-ka-ananuu from Kahaku, Kekaula, and some other kamaainas) was a hunch-backed chief. Ku -aole. Kua. Nalimu. This is the name of the heiau on 1 Italicized texts are hand-written notes on the document that were possibly added by Henry Nalimu. A-2 the land ofMaka-o-Ku opp. C.I., also the name of the cove on the east. Some of the One o Ohele is under the R.R. Lokoaka should be Loko Waka, as I also heard from aged Nalimu and Ka ouli---named for the grandmother of La-ie-i-ka-wai. After taking some 'snaps' of the family the three ofus set out in the auto for Loko Waka. Wai-ahole (nui na aholehole) was a lake in front ofKa-hau-olo-pua's. Ka-hiwa (niu hiwa malaila i keia manawa) was a lowland on the right. Ka-puu-pili (pili-grass hill) with a lake of the same name, out of sight, came next. A garage is at the further boundry. 2 Puu o Kamalii (school-children played there), Princess Pauahi Bishop's land, low and rough. Honohononui ka aina o Pihopa, aole o Puu o K Nalimu. Makai aku o Kahiwa o Na 0laa. Makai aku o na 0laa o Ke One Kahakaha. Makai aku o KOK o Honohononui. Makai aku oia wahi he wahi o Ka 'ulekahe. 0 Ala-opuhi makai aku o Keonekahakaha o Makai aku o Ka-ulekahe oia o Kaupo, he awa pae waa. Mauka a 'e o ia awa o Haleolono, he loko. Wai-aka (shadow water), he ulu 'ulu malaila. 0 Wai-ahole he loko i'a malaila. A ditch is the boundry on the far side. Aole waiaka malaila. Nalimu. Moku-'ulu, on the left of Wai-aka. Ka-ule-kahe (kahe ka ule o na keiki malaila) is makai by the beach. There is good swimming there. Aia mauka aku o Kaulekahe aia malaila o Moku'ulu, he aina kauhale. Kapaa-laho (malo), a lake ending land of Bishop. Ki-'ona-o-Ka-pahu (place of excrement of chief), lake beyond. Papa-kahakaha, stretch of pahoehoe, maked with names, where there used to be a school of a hundred or so pupils attended by Nalimu. The building was of cane-leaves. The rocks were covered with moenas. 0 Loko Waka ka inoa nui o ia wahi aole o Ka papa kahakaha kahi o ka hale kula. Looking across Loko Waka we saw a coconut tree, near which in about two fathoms of water is a long broad stone called Waka in a hole named La-ie-i-ka-wai. If you don't touch this stone with your hand you don't know Loko Waka. Aole lohe o Nalimu. When it rained we sat in the car. I as told that the shower, which Ka-hau-olo-pua though might be of considerable length, because there was no wind, I was told that this was the way the kupunas said 'Thankyou' for recording the place-names. Mahaikea (perhaps so called because the white hinano-flower was used as an unuunu to kapu the place--mahai, kipaku). Beyond was a lake named Hau-a-ni'o (hahau a pani'o ke kapa mamaki). Hana ia ke kapa mamaki ma 0laa. We saw a black lava point called Pohakea where 2 Page 1 A-3 the surf broke (poha' ke kai a ke'oke'o). Looking toward the Seaside Club we saw the sand of Kah.a-i po mauka of the cove (?) Kaupo ' ili-ili, aole one -limu oolu o kela limu -iliili o Kaupo. (lei ka i'a ma ka a-i' i ka po). (Kahai mai nei oe i ka pahu pa'i kii ma kou a-i!. 0 Kahai-po' ka lae a me ke one. Hele hee nalu iloko o ka nalu o Lumi lani (lmnilumi ia ke lii i ka nalu) Kaulekahe a uwa' na Iii ma ka moku o Lumi-lani no ka lumilumi o ka po'e hee nalu. Ma-hi '-kea (Nalimu) he loko kai e pili ana i ke kai. Makai aku o M o Hauani 'o, he awa pa waa, a makai aku o ia wahi o Kau mliui, he kulanakauhale, he ulu niu. Makai aku oia wahi o Waiolena, he awa pae waa. Wai-'Uli makai aku oia wahi. We now drove back to Kahauolopua's where we left him and I went on with Ka-ouli to Mokuola. See Mokuola Paper. Ka-ouli took dinner with me and then we went to learn the names about the Waiakea Ponds, starting in on the E. side of the Wailoa River going up as far as the Filipino Strike Camp and finishing our names from there. Niu-ula is a cave in back of the mauka side of the rear of Hilo Iron Works, about the middle of the stream, in front of a small promentory. From here to the RR bridge the land is Niu-ula. Ki'o-pua (pond for raising fish-fry (pua) till they are lau 'alo, 2 or 3 in. long), where Iron Works is. A little pond mauka of the I. W. is the boundry of Ki' opua and Kaholoina (ka holoi ana?) which extends to Pooke'oke'o (burial place) makai. Aia mawaho o ka loko o Waiakea aia malaila na ki 'o pua pake e hooholo ai i ka pua noe a nunui a hookomo i ka loko o Wai. 0 ko 'u mau kaikuaana o Kuahopu a me Niihau o laua na konohiki o Waiakea. Nalimu. Niuula he ulu nui H9-akc1i akH e }1-iHHki makai aku o Kaoloina. Kioloa (where people went ashore after wading Kaholoina, the crossing-some people were tall, loa, which perhaps explains the name) promentory and cove. Mauka mai o Kaholoina Ka Lae Ku 'i Hili Hanakahi Makai aku o Niu 'ula oia o Hanakahi. (name of chief for which Hilo is called Hilo Hanakahi) a little elevation on Waiakea side of Kioloa. Hanakahi lived there. across road. 3 Kuahua, a stone in the river near the end of a sampan building shed. Kuahua was sometimes a woman and sometimes a shark. Her human body was buried between two coconuttrees on the opposite side of the sampan building shed. If anyone goes there with red clothes he faints and dreams of the woman. He will revive directly if someone chews up a bit of mau 'u 'aki'aki, which may be obtained on the little promontory ofKu'ihili,just down stream. You mustn't bath in the river with red clothes until you are beyond Ku'ihili. At low tide when the top of the stone was above water the shark's food, awa, sugar-cane, bananas, etc. was set on top of the stone. This kupua shark woamn was killed by Pele as were other akuas. Ka Lae Ku'ihili, the first promontory on Waiakea side below the sluice-gate (makaha') known as Umi, for King Umi a Liloa. Hili kukui for staining nets and kapa red was pounded there. There was a little pond there, now dug away. In the stream there are two unnamed holes 3 Page 2. A-4 filled with anae, aholehole, and other fish, on mauka side. 0 ka makaha mua oia o Umi, (2) Piikea, (3) Hua-a', (4) Halauwai, (5) Ka 'Ohi'a. Ka nukuokamani aole like o Nalimu (the scolding of the woman? Same name as peninsula on Hilo side off mouth ofriver.) promontory across from Kuahua. The pond of Wai'eli, dug for raising fish-fry is on the land ofKanukuokamanu. Laukapalili,pili ka loko o Waiakea ma ka aoao ma Puna mai o ka loko, he aina mauka a he wahi moku pohaku iloko o ka wai, oia o Laikapapalili -kanakai aholehole i --illegible-- Kalahu, promontory beyond Laukapalili. Stayed at Camp and got names. Paepae ( one meaning, to support as head with hand) long cove beyond. Lae o Ka Ohe, pahoehoe promontory beyond. Lae o Nanahu, rocky point--pahoehoe. Ka-lima-alae (the five alae birds), spring by Waiakea Warehouse. The stupms (sic.) of ancient coconut trees may still be seen in the water there, showing how the land has sunk. Ka-puna-kea, long pond of spring-water (also name of spring) by Waiakea Mill. Wai-ahole, pond where we saw a little unpainted Chinese house from camp. Moho-uli pond. Ulu o Namu, bread-fruit grove at lower end ofMohouli pond where not are fig and banana trees seen from Camp. Kano-kapa (hapai i ke kapa o na Iii), land by big red house and two mango trees. Kahi e pili ana i ke ka 'e kai oia o Kanokapa a maluna aku oia wahi oia o Kaipalaoa kahi hooluu kaaahi. Kano-kapa, he kanoa kahi i kapala i ai ke kapa. Ka-puka-wai, mouth of Waiakea Pond. Hua'i-niu aia ke pili la mawaho o ka loko o Waiakea. Kanokapa aia i Hilo kahi hoolulu Kaaahi. (uncover cooked coconut?) a long lake that runs to Ka-ohi'a, the other mouth of Waiakea Pond. Ka-ohi'a (hoomoe i ka makaha' me ke kua ohi'a) is the fifth and last makaha', named for a wife of Umi as are the others, Piikea, the large second makaha', a lock, with a gate at each end, Moho a' Hua (moho, bird; a, ua hoohalike ka u'i me ka a ana o ke ahi) 3d makaha', Halau-wai (hale no ka lokomaika'i) 4th makaha'. Men were summone dto cut the timbers for these makaha' s. When the timbers were laid there was a feast. 4 Makole (red-eyed, like old folks), where Umi and his son Maalo lived just on makai side of Piikea. There is a fish box there called Umi. 4 Page 3. A-5 Hau-maka-puu (strike (hahau) swollen eye) where red house by mango trees is a little below Dranga Camp on other side. The servants and lake guards (kia'i loko) lived here. There are some stone piles (puu pohaku) here. Lu-'ae, a squid-stone near three coconut trees and red house across from Dranga Camp. Piko o Wakea, spring in the middle of the upper part of Waiakea Pond. Ka-imu-ki', a fish-house made of a pile of stones in a deep place in the river by Pukawai, now filled with mud perhaps. When you dive or fish here you see a rainbow in the water. Moho-uli Names. Ka-imu-ki', He pua 'i wai iloko o Mohouli, a lua moo in front of La-La'-kea's (formerly Wise's) house. Ka-lihi-wai, a hole in the land by Korean shoemaker's, on opp. side, from La-la'-kea's, now filled perhaps. Opae-nui (opae, ma'i o ke kani kekahi), a large hole between Waiahole and Mohouli ponds. Waiahole Names. Ki'o-pua, pond on E. side ofWaiahole where Chinese raises gold-fish. Lua-ko'ako'a (ko'ako'a, change character?), where the shark Ku-hai-moana came into the pond. He was reared in Ka-lepolepo Pond, from which he made his way to toehr (sic.) ponds through underground passages and went to the island of Ka-'ula. Wailoa Cont. Ka-i'a-nui, cave of a black shark of this name had hole on E. side ofriver across from Iron Works, perhaps about 50 yards from RR bridge beyond the landing. This shark was related to the Namau'u family who lived where Matson house is, south of tracks on Waiakea side of street. Aole lua mano' ma Kalepolepo, he mau pua 'i wai wale no. Nalimu. Aole paha hanai o Kuhaimoana malaila. Mai Keaau mai ka makuahine o Ka-ouli. 5 5 Page 4. A-6 Hawai'i State Archives M86, Folder 487 Provided by Halena Kapuni-Reynolds Hawaiian Place Names. H.B.Nalimu. Sent museum? Na-olaa, that place makai ofKeokea. Na-olaa is makai of where I farmed 'uala with my parents. Makai ofHonohono-nui. I went to school at Loko-aka (Loko Waka, for grandmother of La-'ie-i-ka-wai) with my younger brother. Waiwai was my kumu, he wheezed, he couldn't speak very well. Wai-akea, from Lele-'iwi all the way to Mauna Loa, from Kalana-kamaa (ancient stream. H.E. Kelsey property located in bed. Cor. Hualalai and Kilauea Ave.) all the way to Mawae, that's it's breadth. Hauna (Hanauna, says Mrs. Ka-'ouli Pahi'o. Hauna (bad air) was a fish-pond behind Hata Store by show place) a pond within Loko-aka. Wai-ahole, mauka of the pond named Hauna. Ki-'ona o Ka-pahu, a pond makai ofWai-ahole. Hale o Lono, a pond makai ofKi-'ona o Ka-pahu, where the Japanese hotel is located. Kapa a laho (the brim of the scrotum), a pond mauka ofKi-'ona a Ka-pahu. Ki-'ona o Ka-pahu is where Ka-haku died ( old fisherman). The place where canoes are filled called Kau-me-Ii-eli is in Pi'opi'o, as well as the mortar of the man named Kau-me-li-eli who also owns the canoes. Moho-uli, pond mauka of the pond named Waiakea. Waiahole, pond mauka ofMoho-uli. Ka-lepolepo, pond mauka ofMoho-uli. Lehia, a canoe landing for the folks living mauka of that place. Makai is Wai-uli. It is there where the pit of Kua is located, the shark of my ancestors and the chiefKa-lani-opuu. Ka lae o Kibe, mauka of Lehia. Wai-uli, mauka of Ka lae o Kihe. Wai-olena, land and ocean mauka ofWai-uli. Kau Maui, mauka of Wai-olena. There is a coconut grove there and a village in ancient days. A-7 Hau-a-ni'o (possibly meaning mottled), a bay and canoe landing mauka of Kau-Maui.6 6 Page 2. A-8 DAVIDY.IGE GOVER'-'ORO!' HAWAll STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES STA 1E lllSTORIC PRESERVATION DNISION KAKUHIHEWA BUILDING August 10, 2018 Melissa Dacayanan County of Hawaii, Planning Department 101 Pauahi St, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 96720 Melissa.Dacayanan@hawaiicounty.com Dear Ms. Dacayanan: 601 KAMOKILA BLVD, STE 555 KAPOLEI, HAW All 96707 SUBJECT: Slrl,ANNE D. CASII CIWRPIWON BOAAOOf1.ANDANONATURALRESOURCES COl,IMJSSION ON WATER RESOURCEMANAGEMEITT ROBERT J(. MASUDA FlRST DEPIJTY Jl!rFREY T. PEARSON DEPUTY txRF..CTOR.. WATER AQUATIC RESOURCF..S BOA TINO ANO OC1lAN JUiCREAl!Oll BURFAU Of CONVEYANCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOUKCB MANAOEMENT CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LAlIDS CONSER VA TI� ANO RESOURCF.S ENFORCf,� mGINlililUNU FORESTRY J,.}JnW11nl.TFR IUSTORfC PRESERVATION KAIIOOI..AWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION 1.AND STATE PARKS IN REPLY REFER TO: LOG NO: 2018.01269 2018.01322 DOC NO: 1808SN02 Archaeology Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review -Request for Revocation of SMA Permit No. 334 (SMA 92-000003) SMA Permit Application (SMA 18-000070) Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92 122 (REZ 727) Request to Amend Condition C (Plan Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction) Archeological Inventory Survey of TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 Applicant: Piilani Partners, LLC (Formerly Suisan Co., Ltd.) Waiil.kea Abupua'a, South Hilo District, Island ofHawai'i TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the subject permit applications received on June 6, 2018 (Log No. 2018.01322), and review of the draft archaeological inventory survey (AIS) report prepared in support of the proposed project. The AIS was conducted to satisfy historic preservation review requirements prior to several HRS 6E permit issuances. The report is titled Archaeological inventory Survey TMK: (3)2-2-033:011, Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (Haun and Henry, May 2018). Wereceived the draft AIS report on Jun.e 7, 2018 (Log No. 01269). SHPD requested revisions via email on August 9,2018 (Sean Naleimaile [SHPD] to Alan Haun [Haun & Associates]) and received the revised draft report via emailon August I 0, 2018 (Alan Haun to Sean Naleimaile ). The AIS was prepared at the request of the applicant, Ms. Fumiko Okuda of Columbus East, LLC. on behalf of the landowner, Matsuno Enterprises Ltd. The applicant proposes to construct a warehouse and adjacent office building on the 2.57-acre parcel. Ground disturbance will involve excavations for the building foundations or footings, utilily lirn:s, grading and grubbing activities and the installation of a well in the southern portion of the parcel. There are no immediate plans for additional development of the rest ofthe parcel. The AIS report indicates that several previous archaeological studies have been completed for the surrounding vicinity (Hammatt and Bush 2000; Bush et al. 2001; and Haun and Henry 2001). These studies have identified traditional Hawaiian sites: an agricultural pit, the Puna trail, and five traditional ahu (Hammatt and Bush (2000); a sinkhole burial (Bush et al. 2001); and a terraced depression and low wall (Haun and Henry 2001). The current project area has been subject to ground disturbance associated with sugar cultivation and commercial and residential development. Historic era remains in the general vicinity consist of38 sites with 357 features. Ms. Dacayanan August 10, 2018 Page2 The AIS :fieldwork involved a pedestrian survey of the project area and subsurface testing. The AIS identified one archaeological site (Site 50-10-35-30889), a concrete slab which was interpreted as a historic foundation or walkway and four displace isolated objects, metal gear (Object 1), a concrete post (Object 2), two concrete platforms (Objects 3 and 4). Objects 1 and 2 were determined to be a part of the historic use of the project area, while Object 3 and 4 were a part of more recent use of the project area. Site 30889 is described as a formed concrete slab measuring 10.05 meters long and l .86 meters wide. A test pit (Test Pit 2) was excavated adjacent to Site 30889 which yielded no cultural material. Site 30889 is in fair condition and is recommended for no further work based on adequate mapping, documentation, and photography. rt has been assessed as significant under Criterion d. No cultural materials were identified near Objects 1 and 2. A test pit (Test Pit 1) was excavated near Object 2 which consisted of a similar depositional composition as Test Pit 2, an intact section of asphalt paving was identified in a comer of the test pit. Cultural materials were found in Layer I which consisted of bottle glass fragments and a metal bolt. Layer II had no cultural material. Cultural material in Layer ill consisted of a piece of wire and a metal rod with a copper disc. The report indicates that based on subsurface testing, the project area appears to have been modified by the introduction of fill material. The AIS indicates that a warehouse was located within the project area and removed in the early l 990s. Site 30889 retains integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship and is assessed as significant under Criterion d; it has yielded information important for understanding the historic use of the area. Mapping, written description. and photography adequately document this site, which will likely be affected by the proposed grading and development. No further work or preservation is recommended for Site 30889. SHPD concurs with the report's significance assessments and treatment recommendation. Pursuant to HAR §13-284-7, SHPD's project effect determination is no historic properties affected for the proposed project. Pursuant toHAR §13-284-7(e) "When the SHPD comments that the action sha11 not affect any significant historic properties,the historic preservation review ends". The historic preservation review process has ended. Permitting for the subjectproject may procee<l. Attach to permit: In the unlikely event that subsurface historic resources, including human skeletal remains, structural remains, cultural deposits, sand deposits, or sink holes are identified during the demolition and/or construction work, cease work in the immediate vicinity of the find, protect the find from additional disturbance, and contact the State Historic Preservation Division at (808) 933-7651. The revisions adequately address the issues and concerns identified in our previous correspondence. The report meets the requirements specified in HAR §13-276-5. The report is accepted. Please send via US mail two hard copies of the document, clearly marked FINAL, along with a copy of this review letter and a text-searchable PDF version to the Kapolei SHPD office, attention SHPD Library. Please contact Sean Nii.leimaile at (808) 933-7651 or at Sean.P.Naleimaile@hawaii.gov if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha, A4v1 .JA?w1ter Alan S. Downer, PhD Administrator, State Historic Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer cc: Christian Kay (Christian.Kay@hawaiicounty.gov) Alan Haun ( ahaun@haunandassociates.com) Fumiko Okuda ( okuda.f@gmail.com) Sid Fuke (sidfuke@hawaiiantel.net) FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 WAI.A.KEA AHUPUA'A SOUTH HILO DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAI'I HAUN 8c ASSOCIATES 1481-081018 ARCHAEOLOGICAL, CULTURAL, AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 73-4161 KAAO ROAD, KAILUA·KONA HI 96740 PHONE: 808-325-2402 FAX.: 808-325-1 520 FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 WAIAKEA AHUPUA' A SOUTH HILO DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAl'I Prepared by: Alan E. Haun, Ph.D. and Dave Henry, B.S. Prepared for: COLUMBUS East, LLC 2571 Lemon Road, Honolulu, HI 96815 August 2018 HAUN 8c ASSOCIATES 1481-081018 ARCHAEOLOGICAL, CULTURAL, AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 73-4161 KAAO ROAD, KAILUA·KONA HI 96740 PHONE: 808-325-2402 FAX: 808-325-1 520 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Repo rt No .1481-0 81 01 8 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Haun & Associates conducted an archaeological inventory survey (AIS) of the 2.57 acre TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 located in Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. The objective of the AIS is to satisfy current historic preservation regulatory review inventory requirements of the Department of Land and Natural Resources State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD), as contained within Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Title 13, DLNR, Subtitle 13, Chapters 276 and 284, State Historic Preservation Rules. The survey identified one site in the project area consisting of a concrete slab interpreted as an historic foundation or walkway (Site 50-10-35-308891). The site is assessed as significant solely for its information content. The site has yielded information important for understanding historic activity in the area. The mapping, written descriptions and photography of Site 30889 adequately document it and no further work or preservation is recommended. Four displaced isolated objects were also identified during the project. These consist of a metal gear (Isolated Object 1), a concrete post (Isolated Object 2), and two concrete platforms (Isolated Object 3 and 4). The displaced gear and the concrete post are probably associated with the historic use of the project area; however, the two concrete platforms were brought to the project area in the 1990s and were used to support cooling towers. The proposed project consists of the construction of a warehouse and adjacent office building with associated infrastructure to be located in the southern portion of the project area. There are no immediate plans for the development of the remainder of the parcel. The proposed project will consist of mechanically grading the project area in advance of the construction activity. Site 30889 will potentially be impacted during future development. This activity will have no effect on historic properties because Site 30889 requires no further work or preservation. Cover photo: Vegetation in eastern portion of project area (view to south) 1 All sites listed on the State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP). Site numbers are 5 digit sequential numbers by island : 50 = State of Hawai'i, 10= Island of Hawai'i, 35= Hilo quadrangle, 30889=Site number HAUN & ASSOCIATES I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Contents MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................ 1 Project Area Description ......................................................................................................... 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................. 6 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................... 8 Historical Documentary Research ........................................................................................... 8 Previous Archaeological Research ........................................................................................ 17 Project expectations .............................................................................................................. 19 CONSULTATION ..................................................................................................................... 19 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 20 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 30 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 30 Significance Assessments .................................................................................................... 30 Treatment Recommendations ............................................................................................... 30 TRANSLATION OF HAWAIIAN WORDS .................................................................................. 31 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 32 Figures Figure 1. Portion of 1995 7.5' Hilo quadrangle showing project area parcels ............................................................. 2 Figure 2. Tax Map Key 2-2-033 showing project area ................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Proposed development within project area .................................................................................................. 4 Figure 4. January 21, 2013 Aerial view of project area (from Google Earth) ................................................................ 5 Figure 5. Vegetation in western portion of the project area (view to east) ................................................................. 7 Figure 6. Modern debris within project area ................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 7. Portion of Lyon's 1882 Register Map No. 892 showing approximate locations of project area ................. 12 Figure 8. Mid-20th Century map of Hilo ..................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 9. January 16, 1965 aerial photograph of project area .................................................................................... 16 Figure 10. Previous archaeological work .................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 11. Site location map ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 12. Site 30889 plan map and photographs ...................................................................................................... 22 Figure 13. Test Pit 2 profile and photograph .............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 14. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to east) .............................................................................................. 24 Figure 15. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to northwest) ..................................................................................... 24 Figure 16. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to northeast) ................................................................................. 25 Figure 17. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to south) ....................................................................................... 25 Figure 18. Isolated Objects 3 and 4 plan map and photographs ................................................................................ 26 Figure 19. Test Pit 1 profile and photograph .............................................................................................................. 28 Figure 20. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 ................................................................................................ 29 Figure 21. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 ................................................................................................ 29 I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Tables Table 1. Land commission Awards in Waiakea Ahupua'a ............................................................................................. 9 Table 2. Previous archaeological work in Waiakea ..................................................................................................... 17 I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 INTRODUCTION At the request of Ms. Fumiyo Okuda of COLUMBUS East, LLC, Haun & Associates conducted an archaeological inventory survey (AIS) of the 2.57 acre TMK:(3) 2-2-033:011 located in Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The objective of the AIS is to satisfy current historic preservation regulatory review inventory requirements of the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD), as contained within Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Title 13, DLNR, Subtitle 13, Chapters 276 and 284, State Historic Preservation Rules (DLNR 2003). The developer, COLUMBUS East, LLC plans to construct a warehouse and adjacent office building with associated infrastructure within the southern portion of the project area (Figure 3). There are no immediate plans for the development of the remainder of the parcel. The proposed project will consist of mechanically grading the project area in advance of the construction activity. One archaeological site was identified during the project consisting of an historic concrete slab (Site 30889). This site was recommended for no further work. The site is located outside the area of proposed development but may potentially be impacted during future development. This AIS is prepared in conjunction with a Special Management Area (SMA) permit application for the County of Hawai'i Planning Department. The survey fieldwork was conducted between April 13 and April 18, 2018 by Haun & Associates Project Supervisor Solomon Kailihiwa, M.S and a crew of four archaeologists under the direction of Dr. Alan Haun. Approximately 16 person days of labor were required to complete the fieldwork portion of the project. Described in this final report are the project scope of work, field methods, background information, survey findings, and significance assessments of the sites with recommended treatments. Scope of Work Based on DLNR-SHPD rules for inventory surveys the following specific tasks were determined to constitute an appropriate scope of work for the project: 1.Conduct background review and research of existing archaeological and historical documentary literature relating to the project area and its immediate vicinity--including examination of Land Commission Awards, ahupua'a records, historic maps, archival materials, archaeological reports, and other historical sources; 2.Conduct a high intensity, 100% pedestrian survey coverage of the project area; 3.Conduct detailed recording of all potentially significant sites including scale plan drawings, written descriptions, and photographs, as appropriate; 4.Conduct limited subsurface testing (manual excavation) at selected sites to determine feature function; 5.Analyze background research and field data; and 6.Prepare and submit Final Report. Project Area Description The project area is a rectangular shaped 2.57 acre parcel located in Waiakea Ahupua'a between approximately 15 to 20 ft elevation. All elevations presented in this report are in feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The parcel is bordered to the south by Piilani Street and by vacant land to the north, west and east. The proposed extension of Mililani Street will extend along the west side of the parcel and the proposed Wehilani Street will extend along the north side (see Figure 3). Figure 4 is an aerial view of the project area vicinity taken on January 21, 2013. The Waiakea Fish Pond is located to the west of the project area. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 1 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 1. Portion of 1995 7.5' Hilo quadrangle showing project area parcels I z Q) )> - (.;.) 11r:r:======:;===-===================================;:::;:=======:!:!:!!:+I �� 1(,'.,,-.,;,, .,3- II ' II ., 'j," /'I', , , /�/ .,.�❖ ,._,,,. ,, ,, (,::.1/" ,, ,,,,/1 V,'/ ,, .,,.:'L-:. j 1<,1,,,w,:;LOLANI --- ':,/,..-£pl ... -:,. ./r� /., .. / /l/ -.f.<1 / , ,.... ,/ .I //.' � I/ l/ .. ,-. .,."°" I«. t; I / /�::,�=4, ; / _./ <�;.,. .r-•-', I.W)/r. t--,' j C,4. 11•401• I) ' A/ I�� t.. � , . ., t.i:l I- .!1TRl!.�T ;cl·"· ®I w,1a I �--� .. J / :I. 9"I 1: : --,,.,.., "-.ii N�lf/LMI rc-ty.r'H..,,.J/1 -· -----� (NH0/411-1( ----, ADt>fTION) ��--'( l,IKN�. r6, ... ,:, ,-.o...1 .... 0 ,, __ .," .. ,_,,, ::::::, r ;;; h 'C ... C•) ..IL--c .. --1 0 � 'l Project area ,_,,..]!:. ).( IN(_,. o,,,_,, t;...-1,,.,.._ C• )( ,_1,,, ��:--,r, II L<t-...:: � la- 0 � "C !It s lk&!! J. Pl/LANI PL,#,,T l l ..... 1 il �.,.,) ,.,,.! '><cr; ''•"• ./ H•"'•" (C-ttly o/ H1w•il) E••G-Ord. I�� i' ,t :( r- J-IOOLULU PAIUC:. � !.I !JT�E.l!.T ,..::..;...,.;� / -· t--n'f /;,,";"._,.,.r 7 i�l,A� �I •n.H 1�1 i�$oi!-::f:i:;7 11.••"1' " , 'JJ: --)I, lF7 llLOCX: W A I A ::. 1:: �1 � ./1l..OC.K l'1-H ,1 USE.' "G .BL:lC/< IS 'l.OT,5 PLAT , ..--l"LAT JS- Figure 2. Tax Map Key 2-2-033 showing project area t l· 1-· � "J :::, �"J ij � "C 0 lo: .... � "C ...."C 't' � h "C .... 'l I j .��,. i ' ��i n, ,c-,.,,_,_,_, .,. __ - AlJl'.·tl\'f"Jo: !'Iii-I-I \'UIJJJ:C7 J'U t._'h_,..�tl "'6rc.l, Ors�J: 10,41,4, rHiit ·J·.�,;,r 'itlirli3T CONTNH\N• .1, l"AlltCt.LS �•••�n .. 100 it_ -I s:: ;,<: - (JJ - N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 ........ :;i:, It) "C 0 ...,,.. z 0 .... .i:,. 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 I )> C z Q) 0 () fT1 (f) � I h., m; "ii it I .m 7 I 6RANT ,, . .,,, ro I EtJ":.lRIG LJ6+("' UM'Nf'f, -;,_ I I I p!:,: � I � ..,."" -�,/, � ,1 -· --·· Wrt.N', LOTC. 134 SQ. FT. R10NJYM0�11",-»l1111..1.ANIT} SIDEYAAl)!IETIH:K:OFT FRONT YMDI TO IIE lNCIICAP£D � Rlll 1r) WAREHOUSE•�a311• 1,5009QFT OF1'1CE•2f'.:10'•!180SOFT TOTM. IU.DIHO AAfH l.09010 n IIWJIHGftEOUIREMEHTS! W.X. -.DING HEIGHT• ...,.-0" MiH DISTANCE 8ETWEEH ltAOIMOS• 1�-V Figure 3. Proposed development within project area -a -· C, .. At At TN, =+ :c�; =f �-2·]-03, oi:, STAT'E oP JW'\AI �J HOf'��PAA.J.:AODfrl0N) ZC/Nh6, V-l!lo �1"1I,teqJ FUXJL.f" � N4) ,-,:i;;,- LOT A 111,132 SG. FT TMK, 2-2-033, OIi ZONIN6, 1'1..-20 PROPOSED EXTENSION OF MILILANI STREET fWUtGA£0.MCMOO'KZONING· 1ITAU.1400ICIFTaDOIMA REQJaEJl'HIKNG-l,OIOl.aoD•ISTAU..S N;CLIA£0ACCUSa.£P,t,RKNG-1VN4ACCE.SSaf latiMlAI PNIQNO MJ90IS •Wfrl lTNCWIDITAU.IIZE•l'..-a11'4' •lotfrl I/NI.MX£115af.rALL•l'Vall'.0-•MW. ACCtSSA.18lf•ll,Vl ll'.V PMJYIDEDPAft!ONO• •IJSTNCWIOSl'AUS • 1 VAM ACC£SSa.E IT AU •1ACCIEIIHII.I SITE PLAN SCAU.11N,•30n. L.(W)NQZDfCRQM3P,t£Kt A.OOffARE.AUQ)-10.omlOFT•lu:w:JINGIPACl lCW>ING ZONE 0KNSIQI§; • I LCW)f«:J IE:UR[DNI) GROSS AA.EA c 5.00090 FT •MlH.LDliOINOZOtil•1(N'.ra'a.(J' • �UW>INO Z0NE (0PTIONAI.I • 1Nr • flNr LCW>INOZONEf!0'1!Mt •1-1.0,1,LW«lZONl•:tr-<ra'JIN/ 1 In.= JO rt. LOT B 134 SQ. FT. !!I I I PIILANI 11 PARTNERS, LLC -· �-Ot5CIIPll0N _..., IMPORVEMENTS AT TMK: 2-2-033: 011 "'PUNSTREET Hl.O,HIN72ll WNMEA.tclJTHHLO. 8.NCIOlw.wM TMK::1-2-0U.011 NnfflU SITE PlAN � ORA'MNO MJWIDI """'--'---A 1. 1 � � UII.._:_...SC -I s:: ;,<: -(JJ -1; 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) "C 0 ..., ,.. z 0 .... .I>, 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 :i:' t: I'll w GI ]> 0 11' E 0 ..::. I'll GI ..I'll tl GI 'o' ..0. 0 � ·;; iiij !'l'I ... 0 N ..i N � I'll :::, C I'll .... ,<i GI ..:::, .!!.O ... HAUN &ASSOCIATES I 5 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 The vegetation in the project area consists of bingabing (Macaranga mappa), tropical ash (Fraxinus uhdei) and banyan (Ficus benghalensis) trees, areca palms (Areca catechu), and various grasses and vines. The eastern half of the parcel is comprised of dense grass and trees that have been taken over by vines (see cover photo of this report). The western portion has a high canopy of trees with little grass (Figure 5). There is modern trash scattered throughout the parcel indicating the area has served as an informal dump for local residents (Figure 6). The terrain throughout the project area is relatively level soil. The soil is Keaukaha extremely rocky muck on 6-20% slopes (rKFD). This soil consists of a surface layer of dark brown muck (8") over pahoehoe bedrock (Sato et al. 1973:27). The Keaukaha soil has rock outcrops over 25% of the surface, has a rapid permeability, a medium runoff and a slight erosion hazard. It also is primarily in native forest with cleared areas suitable for pasture. The underlying lava was deposited 750 to 1,500 years ago from Mauna Loa Volcano (Wolfe and Morris 2001:11 and Sheet 2). Annual rainfall in the vicinity of the project area ranges from 3,550 to 4,400 mm (140 to 173 inches; Giambelluca et al. 2013). The mean average temperature in this general area is approximately 73.8 degrees F (usclimatedata.com). There are no surface water sources present in the project area. The project area is located approximately 600 meters inland from the shoreline at Hilo Bay and the mouth of the Wailea River (see Figure 1). Methods Archival research was conducted at the Hamilton Library Hawai'i and Pacific Collection at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa, the University of Hawai'i at Hilo Hawaiian Collection, the Land Survey Office and the Archives Division of the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services, the Bishop Museum Archives, the State Historic Preservation Division library in Hilo, the State Survey Division, and the Hawai'i State Public Libraries in Honolulu and Hilo. The field work portion of the project consisted of a 100% surface examination of the parcel with the surveyors walking transects at 10-meter intervals. Ground surface visibility throughout the parcel was fair to excellent. The features identified during the survey were flagged with pink and blue flagging tape and their locations were determined with the aid of a Garmin Global Positioning System (GPS) Model 60-series device using the North American Datum (NAO) 1983 datum. The accuracy of the GPS device for a single point is +/-3-5 m. This accuracy was increased to approximately 2-3 meters by taking multiple points including property corners and overlying the plotted points on a scaled map using AutoCAD software. The boundary for the sites documented during the project was defined based on proximity and probable age. Features that are likely of similar age (prehistoric, historic) and are less than 15 meters apart are considered to be one site. The sites in the project area were documented by preparing scaled plan maps, completing standardized site and feature forms, and photographic documentation. A total of 2.0 sq meters of excavation was conducted during the project. Test Pit 1 was situated in the southern portion of the project area and Test Pit 2 was located adjacent to the Site 30889 concrete slab. The test pits were excavated in arbitrary levels within stratigraphic layers. Test Pit 1 was terminated on the bedrock substrate and Test Pit 2 was terminated in a culturally sterile deposit. The soil removed during excavation was screened through inch mesh hardware cloth. Following the excavation, a section drawing depicting the stratigraphy was prepared and post-excavation photographs were taken. The test pits were described using standard terminology, referencing USDA Soil Survey descriptions and Munsell Soil and Rock color notations. Texture and inclusion content were also noted. Cultural material recovered during the excavations was placed in paper bags labeled with the appropriate provenience information and transported to Haun & Associated laboratory for analysis. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 6 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 5. Vegetation in western portion of the project area (view to east) Figure 6. Modern debris within project area I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Historical Documentary Research The project area is situated in the ahupua'a of Waiakea in South Hilo District. The ahupua'a is one of the largest in the district covering over 95,000 acres. The ahupua'a extends along the coast from the west side of Hilo Bay to the Puna District boundary and inland to approximately 6,000 ft elevation. Much of the following is summarized from Hilo Bay: A Chronological History {Kelly et al. 1981), an extensive and thorough compendium of historical information about Hilo including Waiakea. Hawaiian traditional and legendary accounts attest to the longstanding importance of Waiakea. The chief of the Hilo region, Kulukulu'a, who resided in Waiakea, was the first conquest of 'Umi-a-Liloa in his campaign to unify the districts of Hawai'i Island. Hilo with its large bay, fishponds, wet taro fields, and abundant freshwater was a population center for commoners and royalty. Kamehameha I and his court resided in Hilo in the 1890s. In preparation for his planned invasion of Kauai in 1802, Kamehameha built a canoe fleet at Hilo, reportedly consisting of 800 vessels. In 1824, a missionary station was established in Waiakea. Soon after, churches and schools were established. Whalers began stopping at Hilo in the mid-1820s. In the 1830s, a sawmill was built, and two stores were opened. By the end of the decade, a sugar cane plantation and mill were established on Ponahawai lands. By 1857, there were three sugar cane mills in the Hilo area. A sugar mill was established in Waiakea at the inland end of Waiakea Fishpond in the late 1870s. By 1880, 1,400 acres of sugar cane were in cultivation and by the end of the decade over 5,600 acres were cultivated. In the 1900s, the population of Hilo grew dramatically with the expansion of sugar cane cultivation, pineapple production, the timber industry, and other commercial developments. Early historic accounts also document the importance of Hilo. In 1823, Ellis estimated the population to be 2,000 people in 400 houses. Ellis described the extensive use of lauhala thatch in house construction in Hilo. He described the land as intensively cultivated with plantains, bananas, sugar cane, taro, potatoes, melons, coconuts and breadfruit. Wet taro was grown in marshland mounds {kipi). Hilo was a center for trade among the people of Ka'u, Hamakua, and Hilo. Between the 1790s and 1820s, sandalwood was cut and brought to Hilo for export. Pulu from tree ferns and pia {arrowroot) were also exported. Ellis also describes coastal fishing. In the 1840s, political acts of the Hawaiian Kingdom government would change the land tenure system in Hawai'i. All lands were segregated into one of three categories: "Crown Lands" owned by the occupant of the throne, "Government Lands" controlled by the state, and "Konohiki Lands" controlled by the chiefs; and "were all subject to the rights of native tenants" {Chinen 1958:29, Beamer 2014:143). In 1846, King Kamehameha Ill appointed a Board of Commissioners commonly known as the Land Commissioners, to "confirm or reject all claims to land arising previously to the 10th day of December, AD 1845." Notices were frequently posted in The Polynesian {Moffat and Kirkpatrick, 1995); however, the legislature did not acknowledge this act until June 7, 1848 {Chinen 1958:16; Moffat and Kirkpatrick 1995:48-49) and the act is known today as The Great Mahele. In 1850, the Kingdom government passed laws allowing foreigners to purchase fee simple lands {Speakman 2001:91). The Kuleana Act of 1850 allowed for fee simple land ownership by commoners. The Waihona 'Aina {2000) Mahele Database; which is a compilation of data from the Indices of Awards {Indices 1929), Native Register {NR n.d.), Native Testimony {NT n.d.), Foreign Register {FR n.d.) and Foreign Testimony {FT n.d.) provides information on the Land Commission Awards {LCA) during the Mahele The Waihona 'Aina database {2000) lists 51 parcels claimed by 37 claimants within Waiakea in the mid-1800s {Table 1). All claims are for parcels HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 8 {J) f'T1 {J) Table 1. Land commission Awards in Waiakea Ahupua'a Apana Sedlon awarded 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 6 1 0 Ill Keawe Kapu N/D N/D Alenoho Kolea Kolea Alenoho Alenoho Kamakola Puainako Alenoho Kalihi Koleaiki N/D Kialoa 1 N/D Alenoho Hinaauauwai or Mahina auwai 5 Kolea Kalonoho Kalonoho Kanahana Puahua Piopio Piopio Kalulunui Land Use Boundary North cultivated Konohikis waste land cultivated, partly fenced Kaulu N/D N/D house lot cultivated planting plot konohiki cultivated field Waiiani cultivated field Kukuau cultivated with 6 houses Iii Ohelo house lot with 2 houses, waste land e:rave house lot Kaapa partly enclosed with 5 Iii Alenoho houses breadfruit tress, sweet Kauhopu ootatoes coffee 2 kihapais; hala grove Kukuau Ahupua'a house lot with 4 houses; konohiki breafruit and kukui trees Keaniho 2 cultivated fields Aiko uncultivated konohiki 4 kihapai; two houses konohiki house lot with 3 houses Barenaba cultivated field Barenaba uncultivated with one house Iii Walenoho cultivated with house gov't land 3 field & 1 house Kaiana 3 wet taro plots & 2 houses fishpond 2 cultivated fields konohiki 4 cultivated kihapai & 2 Kolea houses 1 cultivated kihapai Kekuaaoa's garden 1 kihapai taro mounds Niihau 6 taro mounds Kane uncultivated idle land 2 cultivated fields Kahalelalu 2 cultivated kihapai, road konohiki throue.h lot ---.. ··--_ .. , ..... _ _ _,_ .... Boundary Boundary East South Mikaeleiki Kainea Kamanuhaku Konohiki's waste land N/D N/D ocean Kekuanaoa Kahauai Kaluahino Manu Kalana Stream Pouoki's field Mihaeleiki road to Volcano waste land new road waste land Iii Kolea Iii Koloa Iii Koleanui Iii Kalili konohiki Kahue Iii Kinaauauwai konohiki konohiki konohiki stream konohiki konohiki konohiki Iii Haanaauauwai konohiki Barenaba Samuela Samuela lliWaiuli Pahulu konohiki gov't road Moealoha Alanui Baranaba Iii Kuahua konohiki Iii Kialoa Nakai Kaihenui Niihau Kaaiana Kaihe Kane konohiki Kauhi idle land Samuela idle land Samuela konohiki konohiki Boundary Date Rec'd West Kainea Kalua N/D N/D Kaihenui's house Kahue 1840 Kahue road beside river waste land 1847 waste land 1847 stone wall/gov't land 1841 Iii Alenoho konohiki Iii Kealou 2 Kam.1 time konohiki main road konohiki 1847 Iii Kialoa/Kaiholena Kam.1 time Kam.1 time Keaonui Kukaiholo Kupelea konohiki Kam.1 time konohiki Iii Kaapea Iii Hanahaiau Kalua Kaihenui Kaiamo Iii Alenoho Kaihenui konohiki Giver Konohiki Pea Parents N/D Kapuaakuni Kuiana Kaiana Konhiki Pea Kaunuohua Kaunuohua Pea Konohiki Kahue parents Kaiana Kamahiai parents parents Makaimo Makaino Kuahopu Konohiki Pea Kamehamhea I Kamahiai Acrei 4.41 1.6 0.6 0 2.91 0 10.2 12.2 0 1.3 3.7! 0 0 1.2: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0! 0.2, 0 ;;,,:: (J.J N N 0 (J.J (J.J 0 :;o Ill -0 0 0 .i:,. 00 0 0 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 situated along the coast and immediately inland along the lower reaches of the Wailoa River less than 0.5 mi inland. No land commission awards are present within the project area. Twenty-six parcels were awarded to 24 claimants. Chiefess Kamamalu was awarded the entire iii of Pi'opi'o under Land Commission Award {LCA) No. 7713. The remaining claims are for kuleana parcels ranging from 0.24 to 13.14 acres in area with an average of 3.6 acres. All, except five claims, were for single parcels. The testimonies for several awarded kuleana include claims for parcels that were not awarded. The claim testimonies refer to 18 iii land divisions. Five iii; Kalonoho, Alenoho, Kolea, Pi'opi'o and Paeaahu; are mentioned two or more times and apparently were linear strips of land extending inland from the coast. Iii Kalonoho was situated next to the western ahupua'a boundary with Kukuau. Alenoho was the next iii to the east followed by Kolea, Pi'opi'o and Paeaahu. The latter two iii bordered the west bank of Wailoa River and Fishpond. Six iii for LCAs on the east side of the river, from the river mouth inland, consist of Kamakola, Keawe Kapu, Kialoa, Hinaauauwai, Puahua, a!J.f! Kanahana. Kalihi was situated inland between Alenoho and Kolea. The geographic location of the remaining"Wi cannot be determined because they are mentioned in testimony for claims that were not awarded. � 111 Land use described in thf LCA claim testimony included agriculture, pasture, burial, and residence. Thirty-four houses are mentioned ani LCA 2274 also describes the presence of a grave. Most of the claim testimony mentions 111 cultivated fields. Crops i�lude wet taro, sweet potatoes, breadfruit, coffee, and kukui. A ha/a (Pandanus spp.) 1111 grove and fishponds are 10 mentioned. By 1857, there were thre-! sugar cane mills in the Hilo area. Large tracts of land were put in cane cultivation and "CJ sugar cane was also gro\91 by individuals around their houses. A sugar mill was established in Waiakea at the� inland end of Waiakea Fi�pond in the late 1870s. A railroad transport system was constructed for the Waiakea C Mill between 1879 and j380. Figure 7 is a portions of Lyon's 1882 Register Map No. 892 obtained from the Archives Division oE the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services (http://ags.hawaii.gov/su�ey/map-search). This map shows the Waiakea Mill, located to the southwest of the project area, a wharf andi,e extent of an 1881 lava flow from Mauna Loa that threatened Hilo. Between the 1860s and �80s there were two wharf facilities on the west side of Waiakea Point, one on the CII Wailoa River, and on the ijest side of the bay at the foot of Waianuenue Street . By 1880, 1,400 acres of sugar cane.... were in cultivation and by the end of the decade over 5,600 acres were cultivated. In the 1900s, the population of HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 10 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Hilo grew dramatically with the expansion of sugar cane cultivation, pineapple production, the timber industry, and other commercial developments. Between 1900 and the 1930s, the population of Hilo grew dramatically with the expansion of sugar cane cultivation, pineapple production, timber industry and other commercial developments. In the 1910s, the Hilo Railroad Company expanded the rail system to Puna and Hilo Town. A railroad wharf was built north of the mouth of the Wailoa River. Between 1909 and 1913, the railroad was extended to the North Hilo and Hamakua Districts. The opening of the Panama Canal and anticipated increase in trans-Pacific shipping lead to serious efforts to build a breakwater to protect shipping in Hilo Bay. Construction of the breakwater began in 1908. The breakwater was initially planned for a location just east of Coconut Island, but the plan was modified and the selected site was approximately 6,000 ft east of the island. The initial plans called for a 10,000-ft long breakwater along Blonde Reef. Stone for the structure was brought by railroad from quarries in Puna and Waiakea. The breakwater was completed in 1929. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 11 I )> C z Q) 0 () fT1 en .- teh.. ,how,";!! Lara j'!,,w oJ 168'1 (:;:) <J> 0 ·;i H-;,Jo, /-lo.,ru..it,,. ror,,tc I 0� , A�-�-.; .B,,•,-,t:..,(1,•,l, �, ... ...:.-I"-"""' r1,.-, Jy•..,;--�.,_.,,.._,, ! & ,.,._.,._ CJ1.,n•� -.t oo..-,� CJ:L.!I,,.,..,.., Pi i,h,,OTVu,- / / --:;,_/'- �- ,,.,� .... ,.-,-..,, rz�o;.,.,•·-z ,.3 ..... �� / . -,, .,, ..----< I ,..) $, ..,-/ �r �-/r / 1.. 1j __ ..... .,,,r:-.,,. ,, ,,,, 4£, � '} �_,..,,.o"/,,. --• .,,, j I ., • _..,, • �� � .,.,,i.• ,-,4/ L .,,.;,, vi"' _,,,� ,""J.�t// r G,....t'""'"1"' ,,-✓ \ ,r ,7"',)J � /'. f '.I"'!../ .-, ,,.� ...--i �____,,/J. J/ / ,G' --� -T -----/�/•C-../_,, � 'J �n• 7,.,.���./ -✓-- .E'o-r•., t,. 0 Figure 7. Portion of Lyon's 1882 Register Map No. 892 showing approximate locations of project area �""---'•• """\'• Waiakea Village �1 . -ii. 'I " o.,, .. 0 l ... r..,._._ 'u .z.� oG> coo 0oo�o ◊ •1w ...... ..-\pprox.imatc location of project area 0-.Mdl \ Waiakca Mill Cu,/,.f.:.ZJ. ,.,�,'-, <Lt:, (,. {.,. B ",, C;:,"/j, {)� -I s:: ;,<: (JJ N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) -0 0 ..., ,.. z 0 .... .I>, 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 By the 1910s, the existing railroad and government wharf facilities were inadequate to support shipping. In 1912, the Territorial Government contracted the construction of a new wharf approximately one mile east of Coconut Island and dredging of the adjacent portion of the bay. The new wharf, designated Kuhio Wharf, was completed in 1916. From the beginning, the wharf was congested and plans for a second wharf were made. Construction of the wharf began in 1921 and it was completed in 1923. A third wharf was completed in 1927. In 1932 a Canec manufacturing plant was constructed along Waiakea Pond, located between the Waiakea Mill site and the project area. Canec was the brand name for a fiber board made from bagasse, the byproduct of sugarcane. Figure 8 is a mid-20th Century map of the Hilo area prepared by the Work Projects Administration {WPA) showing the location of the Canec plant and the project area, obtained from the Archives Division of the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services (http://ags.hawaii.gov/survey/map-search). The map also shows the railroad line extending past the project area to the west. The following description of the Canec plant is provided by Peter Young as follows: Between 1879 and 1948, Waiakea Mill Company conducted mill operations at Waiakea Pond. Bagasse -a by-product of sugarcane -became a secondary industry, first as a fuel for the mills' boilers, then as the main ingredient for a wallboard product. As commercial fuel oils became increasingly available in the late 1920s, the use of bagasse as a fuel declined. This byproduct of production was then creatively used to manufacture a wallboard product for construction. In 1929, Hawaiian Cellulose Ltd, a subsidiary of the Waiakea Mill Company applied for a patent for the manufacture of it. {County of Hawai'i) On May 23, 1930, "The leading plantation agencies and a group of business men organize a $2,250,000 corporation for the manufacture of wallboard and other universally used bagasse fiber products. The name chosen was the Hawaiian Cane Products, Limited." {The Friend, June 1930) Later that year, the directors of the company "authorized the purchase of a one-hundred-ton daily capacity plant for the manufacture of insulating board from bagasse." (The Friend, October, 1930) (It ended up costing $2.5-million.) April 27, 1932, the company's Hilo plant (at Waiakea, adjoining Wailoa Pond) was opened; the company emphasized "the overseas distribution for which the industry aims." (The Friend, June 1, 1932) (By 1934, "five carloads were shipped ... to Manchuria." (Friend, July 1, 1934)) Canec was originally the brand name for pressed fiber board made by Hawaiian Cane Products, Ltd., but it has become commonly used to refer to all pressed board of this type. It was formed into sheets similar in size to drywall, as well as other sizes for use as ceiling and wallboard. Canec was used for interior ceilings and walls in many residential and commercial structures throughout the state of Hawai'i. {DOH) Reportedly, Charles William Mason, a Scotsman who ended up in Ola'a on the Island of Hawai'i in 1919, was the inventor of Canec. Mason became the superintendent of Hawaiian Cane Products Company, Ltd., located in Hilo near the site of the Waiakea Mill Company. (Johnston) The use of Canec as a building material in Hawai'i gradually expanded during the 1930s, but greatly accelerated after World War II when construction volume rapidly increased. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 13 I )>C z Q) ffi 0 () � fT1 en .....� L3.J).C/,il,.,,,.D,I. HI L 0 STREET MAP OF HILO SHOWING POINTS OF INTEREST p, ....... by W,P A-. HILO. Scale '(4 1/2. .Y1 0 100 .IC)O '"' - 41111 ... -... - ,_ ......... Figure 8. Mid-20th Century map of Hilo BAY .H. �+£ U, COCONU7 ISLAND (s-� ... �, KUHIO B,,._Y I I ____________ ., HIL 0 AIRPORT ( I I I I I I I , , I , , : H«wa;; N•t% (iuor,I !Ri/1-R•"'J• I I I I � I' I'I ', 1 I ' I I ' I I ' '\.. ___________________ j ', ' ' ' 'rr===============:::, ', "'\ CHAMBER Printecl by OF COMMERCE HAWAII OF HILO -I s:: ;,<: (JJ N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) -0 0 ..,,.. z 0 .... .I>, 00 .... 0 00 .... 0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 It was estimated that from the twelve plantations contributing bagasse to the canec plant, one million tons of bagasse would be available for the production of wallboard. Hawaiian Cane Products was sold to the Flintkote Company in 1948. That year, the Hilo plant manufactured 120,000,000-square feet of canec panels; from 1945 to 1955; the majority of the housing in the Islands featured cane walls and/or ceilings. (HHF) Some suggest the canec plant was destroyed by the May 23, 1960 tsunami that devastated Hilo; actually, a fire destroyed the canec plant a month earlier (April 3, 1960.) In 1971, the hotel complex known now as Waiakea Villas was built on the canec plant site (the adjacent Waiakea plant millpond was made part of Wailoa River State Park. (Young 2016 - imagesofolfhawaii.com) Several devastating tsunamis have impacted the coastal Hilo area in the immediate vicinity of the project area. In 1877, a 16-ft high tsunami struck the coast of Waiakea destroying all houses within 100 yards of the shore along with a wharf, storehouse, a quarantine hospital on Coconut Island and a bridge. On April 1, 1946, a 7.1 magnitude earthquake occurred in the Aleutian Islands, generating a 50 ft high tsunami that struck Hilo, killing 159 people. (Hawaiimagazine.com) Smaller tsunamis struck the area in 1952 and 1957, causing little damage to the Hilo area. Unfortunately, because of this many coastal Hilo residents refused to evacuate on May 23, 1960, when an 8.3 magnitude earthquake in Chile triggered a series of waves that struck the area (ibid.). Many that did leave returned when the first of the waves measured only 3 feet in height; however, subsequent waves would grow to a maximum height of 35 feet, resulting in the death of 61 people. Due to the devastation of the 1946 and 1960 tsunamis, much of Hilo's bayfront was not rebuilt and is now comprised of grassy park areas. Figure 9 is an aerial photograph of the area taken in January 16, 1965 obtained from the University of Hawai'i at Manoa online library (http://magis.manoa.hawaii.edu). This photograph shows a large structure present within the project area. According to Suisan Company's property manager Mr. Harvey Taira, the properties manager for the Suisan Company has owned the property since the 1990s. He said that the parcel formerly contained a warehouse used for receiving fresh produce, and a dilapidated Quonset hut that was not used. Both of these structures were removed in the early 1990s. Potential remnants of this facility were identified during the present project, discussed in the Findings section of this report. The northern portion of the project comprising approximately 23,000 sq feet (0.52 acres) was formerly designated as TMK: (3) 2-2-033:012 (see Figure 2) owned by the Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO) under Grant 13431. This areas was subsequently added to the adjacent Parcel 11, which was owned by Ruddle Sales and Service Company under Grant 11489 (see Figure 2 and Figure 3). In summary, historical documentary research indicates that the shoreline along Hilo Bay was intensively settled and cultivated. In the early 1800s, missionaries established a station at Hilo because of its large population, abundant freshwater and cultivation potential. Soon churches and schools were established. Whalers stopped at Hilo because of the protected anchorage and availability of freshwater and provisions. Sugar cane cultivation, cattle ranching, and trade rapidly changed the traditional subsistence economy during the early to mid-1800s. By the late 1800s, vast areas were producing sugar cane and large scale timber harvesting was underway. Transportation infrastructure included a railroad system and wharf facilities. The area underwent a dramatic increase in population as people came to the area to work for the plantations and other commercial enterprises. Despite the destructive effects of the multiple tsunamis that have impacted the area, Hilo continues to thrive as the largest community on the eastern coast of Hawai'i Island, due in large part to the resilience of the Hilo residents. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 15 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 9. January 16, 1965 aerial photograph of project area I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Previous Archaeological Research A search of the DLNR-SHPD archaeological report database and other sources identified 29 archaeological projects in Waiakea; however, no previous archaeological work has been conducted in the project area. Figure 10 shows the project locations and Table 2 summarizes the projects. Not included in the figure or table are the studies by Stokes (Stokes and Dye 1991), which focused on major sites, primarily heiau throughout Hawai'i Island, a survey of east Hawai'i by Hudson (1932), the fishpond study of Kikuchi (1973), and the general, primarily archival, studies of McEldowney (1979) and Moniz (n.d.). None of the previous studies included the current project area. Stokes (Stokes and Dye 1991), relying in part on the earlier observations of Thrum, listed six heiau for the Hilo area; however, all were destroyed at the time of Stokes fieldwork in 1906. Ohele Heiau, a /uakini temple, was reported for Waiakea. The surveys in Table 2 cover 1,800 acres of Waiakea between sea level and 5,100 ft elevation. The only traditional Hawaiian sites identified in the vicinity of the project area are an agricultural pit, the Puna Trail, and five ahu reported by Hammatt and Bush (2000), a sinkhole containing a human burial identified by Bush et al. (2000), and a terraced depression and associated low wall identified by Haun and Henry (2001). Hammatt and Bush attribute the absence of traditional sites to the massive ground disturbance of sugar cane cultivation and commercial and residential development of the Hilo area. Historic remains identified by the surveys consist of 38 sites with 357 features. Nearly all of the identified features are the result of stone clearing for sugar cane cultivation. Table 2. Previous archaeological work in Waiakea Author Study 1ype• Elevation (Ft Aaeap Historic LIie Noof Noof Trlldltlonll FeMures AMSll sites Fe• Kam (1983) Archival research 0-5 1 None 1 1 Heiau Haun and Henry (2000) Inventory survey 0-15 20 Port 1 4 Walker and Rosendahl (1996) Field inspection 0-460 130 Sugar cane/ developed 5 5 Haun and Henry (2001) Inventory survey 35-40 66 Ranching/Air Field 4 5 Terraced depression and wall Devereux, Borthwick, Hammatt and Orr (1997); Reconnaissance, Hammatt and Bush {2000); Wheeler, Bautista, 40-80 504 Military 4 8 Pit, 5 ahu, and Puna Trail Wilkinson and Hammatt(2014) Inventory survey Haun and Henry (2008) Assessment 59-78 4.0 Sugar cane 0 McGerty and Spear (1999) Inventory survey 70 3 Sugar cane 1 13 Maly, Walker and Rosendahl (1994); Spear Inventory survey, Data 70-80 5 Sugar cane 4 51 (1995) recoverv Kennedy and Ireland (1994) Reconnaissance 70-80 8 ? 0 Carson (1999) Inventory survey 98-131 176 ? 0 Haun and Henry (2016) Assessment 100-105 5 Flood control 0 Borthwick and Hammatt (1993) Inventory survey 120-140 11 Sugar cane 4 Rechtman and Henry (1998) Inventory survey 120-205 40 Sugar cane 1 117 Borthwick, Collins, Folk and Hammatt (1993) Inventory survey 140-330 163 Sugar cane 4 47 Haun and Henry (2007) Assessment 151-183 1.4 Sugar cane 0 Hunt (1992); Hunt and McDermott (1993); Reconnaissance, Robins and Spear (1996); Elbe,Denham and Pantaleo (1997); Spear (1998); McGerty and Inventory survey, 200-1500 106 Sugar cane 11 88 Spear (1999); Dega (2000) Excavation Robins, Fortinii and Spear (1996) Inventory survey 200-1500 264 Sugar cane 3 18 Rosendahl (1994) Field inspection 250-290 11 ? 1 1 Escott (2004) Inventory survey 300-380 258 Sugar cane 6 80 Bush, McDermott and Hammatt (2000); Inventory survey 300-360 20 Sugar cane 1 1 Sinkhole w/burial McDermott and Hammatt (2001) Rechtman (2001) Inventory survey 5000-5100 5 Ranching 0 Total 1800 42 388 HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 17 llstorlc FeMures 4 1 3 3 13 51 4 117 47 88 18 80 357 I )> C z Q) 0 () fT1 en ..... 00 Breakwater 1-Jjjo Bay Figure 10. Previous archaeological work 6000ft 0 2000m �*� �� + '\, � I = Kam (1983) �� 40 3 = Borthwick, Collins, Folk and Halnmntt (1993) 4 = Hunt ( 1992); Hunt and McDe11J1oll (1993); Robins and Spear (1996); Elbe, Denham and Pantaleo (1997); Spear ( 1998); McGerty and Spear (1999); Dega (2000) 5 = Kennedy and Ireland (1994) 6 = Rosendahl (1994) 7 = Maly, Walkerand Rosendahl (1994) Spear(l995) 8 = Walker et al (1996) 9 =Devereux.Borthwick, Hammatt and Orr(l997); Hammatt and Bush (2000) Wheeler, Bnutista, Wilkinson and Hamman (201( IO = Rcchunan and Henry (1998) I I = Carson ( 1999) 12 = McGcrty and Spear (1999) 13 = Haun and Henry (2000) 14 = Bush. McDennott and Hammatt (2000); McDennott and Hnmmatt (200 I) 15 = Haun and Henry (2001) 16 = J-laWt und Henry (2002) 17 = !faun and licnry (2003) I 8 = Escott (2004) 19 = !faun and Henry (2003) 20 = Maun and lienry (2003) 2 I = Hnun and Henry (20 I 6) Rechtman (200 I) Survey at Kulani Prison not depicted -I s:: ;,<: (JJ N N 0 (JJ (JJ 0 .... .... :;i:, It) "C 0 .., ,.. z 0 .....I>, 00 .... 0 00 ....0 .... 00 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 McEldowney {1979) lists 53 traditional Hawaiian sites for Waiakea and 31 historic sites, primarily buildings. Most of the traditional sites were located by Hudson (1932) and Kikuchi (1973). The remaining six were identified during the Statewide Inventory Survey Nearly all were situated along the coast. The sites include 17 fishponds, seven burials, six platforms, five enclosures, three heiau including one previously identified by Stokes, three house foundations, three trail segments, two shrines, several miscellaneous features, and two complexes of platforms, enclosures, and terraces. McEldowney used the limited site inventory and historic documentary evidence to develop a land use and settlement pattern model for the Hilo area. The model consists of five elevationally-defined zones: Coastal Settlement, Upland Agricultural, Lower Forest, Rainforest, and Sub-Alpine or Montane. The Coastal Settlement Zone extended approximately 0.5 miles inland from the shoreline between sea level and 50 ft elevation. The zone was the most densely populated with both permanent and temporary habitations, high status chiefly residences, and heiau. Settlements were concentrated at Hilo Bay and sheltered bays and coves. Also present were fishponds and gardens where breadfruit, coconut, kukui, banana, wauke, sugar cane, sweet potato, and wet and dryland taro were cultivated. The ocean provided fish and other marine resources. The Upland Agricultural Zone was situated between approximately 50 ft and 1,500 ft elevation. Settlement in the zone consisted of scattered residences among economically beneficial trees and agricultural plots of dryland taro and bananas. Lava tubes were utilized for shelter. A pattern of shifting cultivation is believed to have converted the original forest cover to parkland of grass and scattered groves of trees. Wetland cultivation of taro occurred along streams. The Lower Forest Zone ranged from 1,500 ft to 2,500 ft elevation. Timber and other forest resources such as medicinal plants, olona, and birds were gathered from the zone. Site types consisted of temporary habitations, trials, shrines, and minor agricultural features in forest clearings and along streams. Sites in the Rainforest Zone (2,500-5,000 ft elevation) and Subalpine or Montane Zone {5,000-9,000 ft) were limited to trails and associated temporary habitations. These zones were used for intra-island travel and gathering of valued resources including hardwoods, birds, and stone for tool making. Project expectations Based on previous archaeological research and historical documentary evidence, the project area is located in the McEldowney's densely populated Coastal Settlement Zone. The prehistoric use of this area may include permanent and temporary habitations, high status chiefly residences, and heiau. Due to the parcel within Hilo town proper and its proximity to the Waiakea Mill, historic structures may also be present. CONSULTATION The project area is currently owned by the Suisan Company. The project client, COLUMBUS East, LLC, is a developer who proposes to construct a warehouse and an office building on the property {see Figure 3). Consultation regarding the subject parcel was conducted by Dr. Alan Haun with Mr. Harvey Taira, the properties manager for Suisan Company on May 15, 2018. According to Mr. Taira, the project area was purchased by the Suisan Company in the early 1990s. Prior to the acquisition of the property contained a warehouse used for receiving fresh produce, and a dilapidated Quonset hut that was not in use. This warehouse is depicted in Figure 9. Soon after the Suisan Company purchased the land, the warehouse and Quonset hut were bulldozed. Mr. Taira was shown photographs of two concrete platforms identified during the project, designated as Isolated Objects 3 and 4 {see Figure 18). According to Mr. Taira, these platforms, which were used as cooling tower supports for a cold storage facility elsewhere, were brought to the property by the Suisan Company on a forklift in the 1990s. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 19 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 FINDINGS The archaeological inventory survey identified one archaeological site and four displaced isolated objects in the project area. The site consists of a concrete slab (Site 30889). The isolated objects consist of a large metal gear and axle (Isolated Object 1), a displaced concrete post (Isolated Object 2) and two concrete platforms (Isolated Objects 3 and 4). The location of the site and isolated objects is presented in Figure 11. Site 30889 is a formed concrete slab located in the northwestern portion of the project area. The slab is rectilinear in shape and is 32 feet, 9 inches (10.05 meters) long (west-northwest by east-southeast) and 6 feet, 1 inch (1.86 meters) wide. The southwestern corner of the slab is broken, with the remaining sides ranging in height from 0 to 6.25 inches (0.16 meters). A plan map and photographs of the site are presented in Figure 12. The central and portions of the west end of the slab are covered in a thick root mat, with the remainder comprised of exposed concrete. The root from a tropical ash tree extends across the western side of the slab. An Areca palm and several bingabing trees are growing on or adjacent to the slab. Modern debris is scattered around the site. A 1.0 by 1.0 meter test pit (Test Pit 2) was excavated adjacent to the Site 30089 slab (see Figure 12). This excavation revealed two deposits (Figure 13). Layer I consists of 0.3 to 0.36 meters of black (l0YR 2/1) silty clay with 60% cobble and pebble inclusions with no cultural material. Layer II consists of 0.9 to 1.09 meters of boulder, cobble and pebble fill material with no cultural material. Site 30889 is interpreted as an historic foundation or walkway based on its formal type and appearance. The site's integrity is altered and is in fair to good condition. The site is recommended for no further work as the mapping, written description and photography has adequately documented it. It is assessed as significant per HAR §13-284-6 under Criterion d (information content). As stated, four isolated objects were also identified during the AIS (see Figure 11). Isolated object 1 is a large metal gear with an attached axle located in the northern portion of the project area. The gear is 0.67 meters in diameter with 0.04 meter cogs along the perimeter. "SR188" and "20T" are imprinted on the exterior side of the gear. The axle is 1.73 meters long and 0.065 meters in diameter and extends through the center of the gear. There is a 0.11 meter diameter wide metal hub at the other end with remnants of broken metal around its perimeter. Scattered modern trash is present in the area. Overviews of the object are presented in Figure 14 and Figure 15. Isolated object 2 is a displaced formed concrete post lying on the ground in the southern portion of the project area. The post is 13 feet, 2 inches (4.06 meters) long, 9.75 inches (0.25 meters) wide and 7.75 inches (0.2 meters) thick with beveled edges. There is a rectangular concrete base at one end that is 34.5 inches (0.88 meters) long, 31.75 inches (0.81 meters) wide and 11.25 inches (0.28 meter) thick. There is a projection off the main post that is 0.78 meters long, with identical widths and thickness. The end of this projection is broken and metal rebar reinforcing is visible within the concrete. No cultural material was found in association with the post. Overviews of this post are presented in Figure 16 and Figure 17. Isolated Objects 3 and 4 consist of concrete platforms located in the north-central portion of the project area, 31.0 meters south of Site 30889. A plan map and photographs of these objects are presented in Figure 18. Isolated Object 3 is a collapsed concrete platform located at the western end of the site. It consists of a rectangular concrete pad that is 10 feet, 5 inches (3.2 meters) long (east-west) and 6 feet, 1 inch (1.88 meters) wide and 3.5 inches (0.09 meters) thick. The top of the pad is 13 inches to 15.5 inches (0.34 to 0.4 meters) in height above the surrounding ground surface. I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 /�------------------, I I Isolated Object 1I I I I Test Pit2I I I 'Site30889I I I I I 1--Project area boundary Isolated Object 3-� Isolated Object 4 Manono Street-- Test Pit 1 Isolated Object 2\ \ '� -----------------I L Piilani Street N --Mililani Street �*m 0 150 feet 0 50 meters Figure 11. Site location map HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 21 0 0 8.0 feet 2.5 meters Figure 12. Site 30889 plan map and photographs (9}L_J ;,<: :;i:, It) "C 0 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 0 100 150cm Test Pit2 South wall profile Unexcavated Report No.1481-081018 Layer I -Black (1 0YR 2/1) silty clay with 60% cobble and pebble inclusions; no cultural material Layer II -Boulder, cobble, pebble and gravel fill; no cultural material Test Pit 2 -Post-excavation (view to south) Figure 13. Test Pit 2 profile and photograph I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 14. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to east) Figure 15. Isolated object 1; metal gear (view to northwest) I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Figure 16. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to northeast) Figure 17. Isolated object 2; concrete post (view to south) I 0 () N O'I Figure 18. Isolated Objects 3 and 4 plan map and photographs N 15.0 feet 5.0 meters TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 There are two vertical formed concrete posts set on the ground at the western end of the pad. These posts are 10.5 inches {0.26 meters) square with beveled edges, and are 43.5 to 44 inches {1.1 to 1.12 meters) tall. The top of each post is broken. There is a displaced post lying on the surface of the pad. Modern trash is scattered around the feature. Isolated Object 4 is located 13.4 meters to the east-southeast of Isolated Object 3. This platform is intact and consists of four vertical posts that support a concrete pad. The feature is rectangular in shape and is 10 feet, 1 inch {3.08 meters) long (northwest by southeast) and 5 feet (1.55 meters) wide. The surface of the platform is a formed concrete pad that is 17.5 inches {0.45 meters) thick. The posts are 10.5 inches {0.26 meters) square with beveled edges. The surface of the platform is 51 to 58.5 inches (1.3 to 1.49 meters) in height above the ground surface. The bottom of the concrete pad is 35.5 to 41 inches {0.9 to 1.04 meters) above the ground. Modern trash is also present in the area surrounding this feature. As stated in the Consultation section, according to Mr. Taira, these platforms which were used as cooling tower supports for a cold storage facility elsewhere and were brought to the property by the Suisan Company on a forklift in the 1990s. A 1.0 by 1.0 meter test pit (Test Pit 1) was excavated in the southern portion of the project area, 25.0 meters north of Piilani Street (see Figure 11). This excavation revealed similar deposits to that observed in Test Pit 1 (Figure 19). Layer I consists of 0.14 to 0.18 meters of black {lOYR 2/1) silty clay with 55% cobble and pebble inclusions. An intact section of asphalt paving is present in the northeast corner of the test pit. Cultural material from Layer I consists of amber, light green and colorless bottle glass fragments, and a threaded metal bolt (2.5 inches long with 3/4" square head). Layer II consists of 0.04 to 0.08 meters of dark reddish brown {5YR 3/4) cinder gravel fill with no cultural material. Layer Ill consists of 0.48 to 0.86 meters of boulder, cobble and pebble fill. There is a 0.31 meter thick remnant of a concrete block located along the western side of the test pit. Cultural material from Layer Ill consists of a 2.25 inch piece of wire and a metal rod with a copper disk at one end. The metal rod is 9 inches long and 1/2 inch in diameter (Figure 20). The copper disk is 1.5 inches in diameter and has "Lunkenheimer" and "Fig. 2129" embossed on one side (Figure 21). Lunkenheimer was a manufacturing company established in 1862 that produced bronze and iron valves (http://www.lunkenheimercvc.com). It is likely that this object is a portion of a valve designed to control the flow of water or other liquid. The subsurface testing indicates that the project area has been modified by the introduction of fill material. Layer II and Layer Ill in Test Pit 1 and Layer II in Test Pit 2 are interpreted as imported fills based on their material composition and appearance. The presence of the surface sites in the project area, built on top of the Layer I soil deposit, suggest this soil was also an imported fill layer. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 27 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 0 Concrete block 100cm Test Pit 1 North wall profile Report No.1481-081 018 Asphalt 100cm Layer I -Black (1 OYR 2/1) silty clay with 55% cobble and pebble inclusions; cultural material present Layer II -Dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4) cinder gravel fill; no cultural material Layer Ill -Very dark brown boulder, cobble, pebble and gravel fill; cultural material present Figure 19. Test Pit 1 profile and photograph I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 o 2 3 4 5cm Figure 20. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 Report No.1481-081018 0 1 2 3cm Figure 21. Metal rod and copper disk from Test Pit 1 HAUN &ASSOCIATES I 29 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 CONCLUSION Discussion Report No.1481-081018 The results of historical and archaeological background research indicates that a warehouse was formerly located in the project area {see Figure 9). This facility was subsequently removed in the early 1990s. The potential remnants of this facility, represented by a concrete slab, a metal gear and a concrete post remain in the project area. The project area is located in close proximity to the Waiakea Fish Pond and it is probable that the area was once extensively used prehistorically. However, subsurface testing during the project indicates that the subject parcel was significantly impacted by the historic introduction of fill material. No evidence of the pre-contact use of the project area was observed during the archaeological inventory survey. Significance Assessments The sites identified during the survey are assessed for significance based on Hawai'i Administrative Rules {HAR) §13-284-6. According to {HAR) §13-284-6 {b), a site must possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association and shall meet one or more of the following criteria: 1.Criterion "a": Be associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns of our history; 2.Criterion "b": Be associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3.Criterion "c": Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master; or possess high artistic value; 4.Criterion "d": Have yielded, or is likely to yield, information important for research on prehistory or history; and 5.Criterion "e": Have an important traditional cultural value to the native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group of the state due to associations with traditional cultural practices once carried out, or still carried out, at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs, events or oral accounts-these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity. The site in the project area possesses integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship. It is assessed as significant under Criterion "d". The site has yielded information important for understanding the historic use of the project area. Treatment Recommendations The mapping, written description and photography of the Site 30889 adequately document it and no further work or preservation is recommended. The developer plans to construct a warehouse and adjacent office building with associated infrastructure to be located in the southern portion of the project area. There are no immediate plans for the development of the remainder of the parcel. The proposed project will consist of mechanically grading the project area in advance of the construction activity. Site 30889 will likely be impacted during future development. This activity will have no effect on historic properties because Site 30889 requires no further work or preservation. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 30 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 TRANSLATION OF HAWAIIAN WORDS1 ahupua'a -traditional Hawaiian land unit usually extending from the uplands to the sea ha/a -The pandanus or screw pine (Pandanus odoratissimus) heiau -Pre-Christian place of worship, shrine 'iii -next in importance to ahupua'a and usually a subdivision of an ahupua'a konohiki -headman of an ahupua'a land division under the chief kukui -Candlenut tree (Aleurites moluccana), a large tree in the spurge family bearing nuts containing oily kernels kuleana -small piece of property, as within an ahupua'a Miihele -land division of 1848 mauka -inland olona - A native shrub (Touchardia latifolia), with large, ovate, fine-toothed leaves pahoehoe -Smooth, unbroken type of lava, contrasting with a'ii lava pia -General name for starch; starch made from arrowroot is called pia Hawai'i to distinguish from other starches pu/u -soft, glossy, yellow wool on the base of tree fern leaf stalks (Cibotium spp.). 1 -from wehewehe.org HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 31 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 REFERENCES Archives Division of the Hawai'i Department of Accounting and General Services. 2017 http://ags.hawaii.gov/survey/map-search Beamer, Kamanamaikalani 2014 No Miikou Ka Mana Liberating a Nation. Kamehameha Publishing 2014, Honolulu, HI. Borthwick, D., and H.H. Hammatt 1993 Supplemental Archaeological Survey and Testing of the Proposed University of Hawai'i at Hilo Expansion Area (TMK:2-4-01:10). Prepared for Engineering Concepts. Borthwick D., J. Collins, W.H. Folk and H.H. Hammatt 1993 Archaeological Survey and Testing of Lands Proposed for Research and Technology Lots at the University of Hawai'i at Hilo (TMK:2-4-01:7 and 41). Prepared for Engineering Concepts. Bush, A., M. McDermott, and H. Hammatt 2000 Archaeological Inventory Survey of an Approximately 20-Acre Parcel Proposed for the USDA Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center located near the Intersection of Komohana and Puainako Streets, South Hilo, Hawai'i Island (TMK: 2-4-01:por. 122). Cultural Surveys Hawai'i, Inc Report prepared for SSFM International Inc. Carson, M.T. 1999 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the 176-acre Pana'ewa Campus Site, Waiakea Ahupua'a, Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (TMK:2-1-13:154) Chinen, Jon J. 1958 The Great Miihele: Hawaii's Land Division of 1848. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. DNLR (Department of Land and Natural Resources) 2003 Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Title 13, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Subtitle 13, State Historic Preservation Division Rules. Dega, M. 2000 Addendum to: Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project, Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukua 1 and 2, South Hilo District, Hilo, Island of Hawai'i. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. report Prepared for Okahara and Associates. Devereux, T.K., D.F. Borthwick, H. Hammatt, and M. Orr 1997 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Keaukaka Military Reservation, South Hilo District, Hawai'i Island, Cultural Surveys Hawai'i. Eble, F.J., T. Denham, and J. Pantaleo 1997 Draft Report of Supplemental Archaeological Testing Conducted Along the Proposed Alternate Alignments of Puainako Street (TMK:2-4-01), Hilo, Hawai'i. On file at State Historic Preservation Division, Kapolei, Hawai'i. I TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Ellis, W. 1963 Journal of William Ellis, Narrative of a Tour of Hawai'i, or Owhyee ... Honolulu: Advertiser Publishing Company. FR n.d. Foreign Register of Kuleana Claims Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. FT n.d.Foreign Testimony Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. Giambelluca, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y.-l. Chen, P.-S. Chu, J.K. Eischeid, and D.M. Delparte 2013 Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawai'i. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 94, 313-316, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11- 00228.1. Hammatt, H.H. and A.R. Bush 2000 Archaeological Inventory Survey of Selected Portions of the Hawai'i Army National Guard 503.6-acre Keaukaha Military Reservation, Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Hawai'i Island {TMK:2-1-12:3 and 2-1-13:10). Haun and Henry 2000 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Hilo Harbor Facilities Expansion, TMK: 3-2-1-09: 2, 12, 41, 42 and TMK: 3-2-1-07: 20-37, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Prepared by Haun & Associates for R.M. Towill Corporation. 2001 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Hilo International Airport Improvements, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK:2-1-12:por 9). Haun & Associates Report 015 prepared for Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. 2002 Archaeological Inventory Survey, DHHL Project at Panaewa, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK: (3) 2-2-47: 01). Haun & Associates Report 173 prepared for Mr. Brian Nishimura. 2003 Archaeological Inventory Survey, DHHL Project at Panaewa, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK: 2-2-47:por 64), Haun & Associates Report 300 prepared for PBR Hawai'i. 2007 Archaeological Assessment, TMK: (3) 2-4-01: 116, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Haun & Associates report 577 prepared for Mr. Sidney Fuke. 2008 Archaeological Assessment, TMK: (3) 2-2-30: Parcels 17 and 19 Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Haun & Associates report 571 prepared for Hooluana Place LLC. 2018 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i {TMK: 2-1- 013:Por. 148), Haun & Associates Report 1102 prepared for PBR Hawai'i. Hawaii Magazine 2018 hawaiimagazine.com HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 33 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Hudson, A.E. 1932 Archaeology of East Hawai'i. B.P. Bishop Museum Manuscript. Honolulu. Hunt, T.L. 1992 Interim Report: Archaeological Inventory Survey Puainako Street, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i, Prepared for Okahara & Associates, Engineering Consultants, Ms. on file at State Historic Preservation Division, Kapolei, Hawai 'i. Hunt, T.L., and M.J. McDermott 1993 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Puainako Street Extension Project, Lands of Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2, and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Hawai'i. Prepared for Okahara & Associates, Hilo. Indices 1929 Indices of Awards Made by the Board of Land Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Images of Old Hawaii 2016 magesofoldhawaii.com Kam,W. 1983 Letter Report: Unrecorded Heiau on State Lands, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai'i (TMK:2-1-07:11). Kelly, M., B. Nakamura and D.B Barrere 1981 Hilo Bay: A Chronological History, Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai'i. Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Honolulu. Kennedy, J. and S. Ireland 1994 An Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Hilo Forestry Office Complex Extension located at TMK: 2- 2-2701, in Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i, Archaeological Consultants of Hawai'i, Inc. Kikuchi, W.K. 1973 Hawaiian Aquacultural Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona. Maly, K. 1996 Historical Documentary Research and Oral History Interviews: Waiakea Cane Lots (12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 20a). Prepared for UHH Hooikaika Club. Maly, K., A.T. Walker and P.H. Rosendahl 1994 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Waiakea Cane Lots, Portion of Parcel 6.Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (TMK:2-4-57:01) PHRI Report 1370. Prepared for Roy Takemoto. McDermott, M. and H. Hammatt 2001 Addendum to: Archaeological Inventory Survey of an Approximately 20-Acre Parcel Proposed for the USDA Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center located near the Intersection of Komohana and Puainako Streets, South Hilo, Hawai'i Island (TMK: 2-4-01:por. 122). Cultural Surveys Hawai'i, Inc Report prepared for SSFM International Inc. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 34 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 McEldowney, H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawai'i. Prepared for the U.S. Army Engineer District, Honolulu prepared by the Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum. McGerty, L. and R.L. Spear 1999 An Inventory Survey of an Additional Unsurveyed Portion of TMK:2-4-57:1, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Prepared for R.M. Towill Corp. Moffat, R. M. and G.L. Kirkpatrick 1995 Surveying the Mahele: Mapping the Hawaiian Land Revolution. Palapala'aina. Honolulu: Editions Limited. Moniz, J.J. n.d.Historical and Archaeological Synthesis of Land Use and Settlement Patterns, Waiakea Ahupua'a, Hilo District. NR n.d.Native Register of Kuleana Claims Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. NT n.d.Native Testimony Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. Rechtman, R. and J.D. Henry 1998 University of Hawai'i-Hilo, Kawili Street Development, Archaeological Inventory Survey (TMK:3-2-4- 01:5), Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. PHRI Report 1877 prepared for Inaba Engineering, Inc. Rechtman, R. 2001 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility at Kulani Correctional Facility (TMK: 3-2-4-08:9). Rechtman Consulting Report RC- 0078 prepared for Ron Terry, Ph.D. Robins, J., W. Fortini, and R. Spear 1996 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Proposed Mohouli Connector Road, Ahupua'a of Kukuau 1 and 2, Ponahawai and Punahoa, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Scientific Consultant Services of Hawai'i report 085-2 prepared for Youngki Hahn, Ph.D. Robins, J.J., and R.L. Spear 1996 An Inventory Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1-2, and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Report prepared for Okahara and Associates. HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 35 TMK:(3)2-2-033:011 Report No.1481-081018 Rosendahl, P.H. 1994 Archaeological Field Inspection, Hale Nani Work Release Center, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. PHRI Letter Report 1516. Prepared for Belt Collins Hawai'i. Sato, H.H., E.W. Ikeda, R. Paeth, R. Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and University of Hawai'i Agricultural Experiment Station. Washington D.C. Government Printing Office. Speakman, C.E., Jr. 1978 An Informal History of the Hawaiian Island. San Rafael: Pueo Press. Spear, R.L. 1995 Data Recovery Excavations for Sites 50-10-35 19431, 19432, 19433 and 19434, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i (TMK:2-4-57:01). Report prepared for Roy Takemoto. 1998 Letter Report concerning Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2 and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai 'i. Scientific Consultant Services Inc., Honolulu, Hawai'i. Stokes, J. and T. Dye 1991 Heiau of the Island of Hawai'i. Bishop Museum Bulletin in Anthropology 2. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. U.S. Climate Data website (http://www.usclimatedata.com) University of Hawai'i at Manoa online library 2017 http://magis.manoa.hawaii.edu Waihona 'Aina Corporation 1998 The Mahele Database, waihona.com. Walker, A.T. and P.H. Rosendahl 1996 Archaeological Assessment Study, Hilo Judiciary Complex Project, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. PHRI report 1721 prepared for State of Hawai'i, Dept. of Accounting and General Services. Wehewehe.org 2016 Hawai'i Electronic Library -Na Puke Wehewehe '(J/elo Hawai'i Wheeler, M., 0. Bautista, S. Wilkinson, and H. Hammatt 2014 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Monitoring Plan, Phase I, Keaukaha Military Reservation (KMR), Hawai'i Army National Guard Facility Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i, TMKs: [3]2-1-012:003, 131 and [3] 2-1-013:010, Cultural Surveys Hawai'i report prepared for Hawai'i Army National Guard. Wolfe, E., and J. Morris 2001 Geological Map of the Island of Hawai'i. U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S Geological Survey HAUN & ASSOCIATES I 36 1 Caudia Rohr 369 Nene St. Hilo, HI 96720 808-640-5976 crohr4@gmail.com March 10, 2025 Re: Comments on Talon 1 Properties Self-Storage Warehouse Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact. The Draft Environmental Assessment is incomplete and the Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact is wrong, in my opinion. The DEA admits that “the site's proximity to Wailoa River/Waiakea Fishpond prompt an analysis of potentially adverse social, visual, and environmental impacts in the CZM area.” [DEA digital page 121.] In most instances, an action shall be determined to have a significant effect on the environment if it may: (2) Curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment; (3) Conflict with the State's environmental policies or long-term environmental goals established by law; (6) Involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities; (12) Have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and viewplanes, during day or night, identified in county or state plans or studies; HAR §11-200.1-13(b) Significance criteria. Since the above significance criteria apply to this project, an environmental impact statement shall be required per HRS 343-5(e),as follows: 2 A. HAR §11-200.1-18 Preparation and contents of a draft environmental assessment. Under HAR §11-200.1-18(b), “analyses in a draft EA shall be commensurate with the importance of the impact,” and (c) the level of detail in a draft EA “shall be more specific for components of the program for which site specific, project-level impacts are discernible.” The DEA is incomplete because it failed to provide adequate detail and analysis of the primary component—a 93,603 Sq. Ft. three story self-storage warehouse and its potentially adverse social, visual, and environmental impacts in the surrounding SMA and Wailoa River Area. “[I]n the design and review of any improvements, due consideration shall be given to the minimization of noise and adverse visual impacts through appropriate siting, height, bulk, color schemes, signage, and landscaping.” Rezone Ordinance 1992-122, Section 2 (E). The DEA unreasonably omits due consideration of appropriate siting, height, bulk, color schemes, signage, landscaping and all outside dimensions of the building in the narratives and figures. See, SUMMARY OF PROJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES (SUPPLEMENTAL CHANGE OF USE & SIZE) digital page 16; Self-storage Warehouse in Figure 7: Conceptual Site Plan Self-storage warehouse digital page 18, Figure 8: Conceptual Floor Plan of Self- storage warehouse digital page 19, Figure 9: Conceptual Elevations of Self-storage warehouse digital page 20. A member of the public has to add up minor dimensions to determine the outside measurements of the building. The DEA unreasonably relies on screening provided by trees on the vacant lots across the street that it has no control over to claim: “[t]he proposed improvements should not have any adverse impact to the recreational resources of the area.” DEA, digital page 118. “Wailoa River State Park is located roughly 625 feet to the west of the subject Property and is an open space resource. The park is not visible from the subject site as it is adjacent to an uncleared, vacant lot. The vegetation on the vacant 3 lot is mostly tall trees, which obstructs visual impacts to and from the park to the subject site.” DEA, digital page 119. B.Zoning. The applicant unreasonably wants to resurrect previously abandoned Rezone Ordinance 1992-122, which changed the district classification from RESORT- HOTEL, SAFETY (V-5-.75) TO LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (ML-20). Rezone Ordinance 1992-122 is a legislative anomaly. The rezoning was disfavored by the planning director and the County council decided to rezone the property anyway in order to allow Suisan Company Ltd. to build a new fish processing facility convenient to Suisan Fish Market and the mouth of the Wailoa River to expand the fishing industry to support local fishermen. Suisan Ltd. abandoned that location for its operations sometime after 1994. This project is not the same thing. It offers few jobs once the warehouse is completed and little impact on the Hilo economy. 1.Feasibility Study – Suisan Limited. The DEA’s background section is incomplete without a discussion of the Feasibility Study requested by the county council by resolution in 1990, as follows: Feasibility Study – Suisan Limited The Hawaii County Council adopted Resolution No. 151-90 on March 23, 1990 which requested the Planning Director to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of redesignating the land areas identified as Tax Map Key 2-2-33:4, 11, 19 and 20 from Medium Density Urban to Industrial Area on the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map. The lands involved are situated between the Hoolulu Park complex and Wailoa River state Recreation Area in Waiakea, City of Hilo, south Hilo, Hawaii. According to the County Real Property Tax Office, parcel 4 contains an area of approximately 5.29 acres and is owned by Bishop Estate. Parcels 4 11, 19 and 20, consisting a total area of approximately 2.04 acres, are owned by Toshiaki Shioda. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. The adoption of Resolution No. 151-90 is in support of the request made by Suisan Company, Limited to the County Council to redesignate the subject lands for industrial use to enable the company to eventually relocate their fish processing operation and back-up storage facilities to these properties. In support of the requested Industrial Area, the resolution states the following rationale: STATE AND COUNTY PLANNING DOCUMENTS 2. The subject properties are classified Urban by the State Land Use Commission. 3. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map designates the area as Medium Density Urban. This urban designation may include uses such as village and neighborhood commercial, residential and related functions (3 story commercial; residential--up to 35 units per acre). 4. The Hilo Community Development Plan which was adopted by the Planning Commission in 1975 recommends the area for Multiple Family Residential zoning at a density of four (4) units per acre. It recommends Industrial area expansion at the airport mauka areas, and in-filling at the harbor and Kanoelehua Industrial areas. 5. The County zoning designation is Resort-Hotel, Safety with 750 square feet of land area per unit (V-S-.75). 6. The subject area is situated within the Special Management Area (SMA) of the County of Hawaii. The objectives of the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program, as expressed through Chapter 205A, HRS, and Rule 9 of the Hawaii County Planning Commission relating to SMA, are the protection of coastal recreational resources, historical and cultural resources, scenic values, coastal ecosystems and coastal dependent economic uses. An SMA Use Permit would be necessary for the development of the subject area. PREVIOUS LAND USE ACTIONS 5 7. In 1985, the landowners of the subject properties submitted suggestions on land use changes to the Planning Director for consideration during the recent General Plan comprehensive review. 8. The Kamehameha Schools/Bishop Estate submitted a suggestion for General Plan revision from Resort and Open Area to High Density Urban, Medium Density Urban and Industrial designations for the area along Mililani and Manono Streets; adjacent to the Waiakea Village complex, Wailoa River State Recreation Area and across from the Hoolulu Park complex. These properties were identified by Tax Map Key 2-2-31:10, 11, 12 and 14, and 2-2-33:4. The suggestion was submitted to allow for a mixed use of commercial, multi-family residential and light industrial activities on those properties. The Planning Director had recommended that the area mauka of Piilani Street and adjacent to the Waiakea Village complex be redesignated to High Density Urban and the area makai of Piilani and along Manono Streets be redesignated to Medium Density Urban. The Planning Director determined that the Industrial designation was inappropriate due to the scenic and recreational resources of the adjacent Wailoa River State Recreation Area as well as the mix of residential and commercial uses of the surrounding area. 9. Jack Ujimori, on behalf of Toshiaki Shioda, submitted a suggestion for a change from Resort and Open to Medium Density Urban for the area on the northeast corner of the intersection of Mililani and Piilani Streets. The properties involved were identified by Tax Map Key 2-2-33:11, 19 and 20. The suggestion was submitted in order to establish commercial activities which would benefit users of the Wailoa River State Recreation Park and the events at the Hoolulu Park complex as well as the residents in the area. The Planning Director had recommended that this area be also redesignated to Medium Density Urban. Subsequently in 1989, the County Council had requested the Planning Director to reconsider designating this area for Industrial. While the subject area included some ongoing non-conforming industrial uses, the Planning Director determined that the Industrial designation for the area would be inappropriate due to the scenic and recreational resources of the Wailoa River State Recreation Area as well as the mix of residential and commercial uses of the surrounding area. 10. In consideration of the foregoing, the present General Plan Medium Density Urban designation for the area makai of Piilani Street, along Manono Street and adjacent to the Wailoa River State Recreation 6 Area became effective on November 14, 1989 pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance No. 89-142, County of Hawaii General Plan, by the Hawaii County Council. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY 11. The site is located adjacent to the Hoolulu Park complex and the Wailoa River State Recreation Area. More specifically, parcel 4 lies across the Hoolulu Park Complex fronting Manono Street and abuts portion of the Wailoa River State Recreation Area to the north, Bishop Estate lands on the west and State-owned lands on the south. The parcel is overgrown with vegetation and presently vacant of any uses. 12. The area of parcels 11, 19 and 20 lies approximately 176 feet south of parcel 4 at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mililani and Piilani Streets. It also abuts the Bishop Estate lands to the west and the State lands to the east. Parcel 11 contains an existing nonconforming warehouse which is partially utilized by Hawaiian Sun Products, Inc. for fruit processing. Parcel 19 is vacant of any structures or uses. Parcel 20 also contains an existing nonconforming warehouse but has collapsed and is vacant of any uses. 13. The two subject areas are separated by a proposed 60-foot wide road right-of-way (Wehilani Street) and a vacant 23,292 square foot parcel owned by Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. 14. The Soil Survey Report, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, classifies the land as Keaukaha Series (rKFD) extremely rocky muck, 6 to 20 percent slopes. The soils consist of well-drained, thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. In a representative profile the surface layer is very dark brown muck about 8 inches thick. The soils above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable, but water moves rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. 15. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) classifies a major portion of the subject site as Zone X, areas determined to be outside 500-year flood plain. A small portion along the northwest corner of parcel 4 is within the Special Flood Hazard Zone AE with base flood elevations ranging from 11 to 17 feet. Any development on the site would have to conform with the design and structure requirements of the County of Hawaii flood control ordinances. 7 SURROUNDING LAND USE 16. The surrounding lands are also classified Urban by the State Land Use Commission. 17. Lands to the north and east of the subject site are designated by the LUPAG Map as Open Area, to the west and south are Medium Density Urban and lands to the southwest as High Density Urban. 18. General Plan Industrial designation is located along and extends eastward of Kanoelehua Avenue from Kalanianaole Avenue to Puainako Street. Industrial designation also parallels Kanoelehua Avenue on the west side along Kalanikoa Street, approximately 1,500 feet or three (3) blocks east of the subject site. Since 1970 there have been several industrial zone requests for lands in those areas which have being reviewed and approved by the County Council. 19. The Hilo Community Development Plan recommends that the area to the west of the subject site be developed for multi-family residences so as the recreational amenities can be enjoyed by residents. It also recommends that lands to the north and east be kept in open space for recreational purposes. 20. The Hoolulu Park complex and Wailoa River State Recreation Area, situated to the north and east, are zoned Open. The properties to the south and southeast of the site are zoned General Commercial-7,500 square feet (CG-7.5). Several retail stores, offices and restaurant establishments have been constructed in the area within the past ten years. Properties to the west and southwest are similarly zoned Resort- Hotel, Safety-.75 square feet (V-S-.75) and are presently vacant of any uses. The adjoining properties owned by the State and BELCO are also zoned Resort-Hotel, Safety-.75 square feet (V-S-.75). The state-owned parcel contains an existing dilapidated warehouse which is vacant of any uses. The HELCO parcel is vacant of any structures or uses. These zone designations have been in place since the adoption of the City of Hilo Zone Map in 1968. 21. The Waiakea Houselots which were created by the Territory of Hawaii in the early 1900's are generally zoned Single Family Residential and range from 10,000+ to 20,000+ square feet in size. The majority of the single family dwellings situated within this area are still habitable and are in airly good condition. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND FACILITIES 8 22. Access to the site is from Manono and Piilani Streets. Manono Street has a right-of-way width of 50 feet with a 34-foot pavement. Piilani Street is 60 feet wide with a 22-foot wide pavement. 23. All essential utilities are available to the subject area. [End][See attachment] 2.Rezone Ordinance 1992-122. Rezone Ordinance 1992-122, changing the district classification from RESORT-HOTEL, SAFETY (V-5-.75) TO LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (ML-20), has long expired. The time to apply for a time extension to Rezone Ordinance 1992-122, Section 2, (C) plan approval started on October 24, 1995, one-year after October 24, 1994: Effective date of final approval for Consolidation 831-Revised, which consolidated TMKs 2-2-033: 011, 012, 019, and 020 into one lot identified by the current TMK: (3) 2-2-033: 011. Rezone Ordinance 1992-122, section 2(N) mandates: “[s]hould any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Director shall initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation. The DEA does not explain: (1) Why the Director should not initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation? (2) Why as an alternative, Talon 1 Properties, LLC should not initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation? C.General plan: The Talon 1 Properties Self-storage Warehouse project must be consistent with the framework of the General Plan. HRS §46-4(a) mandates in relevant part: “Zoning in all counties shall be accomplished within the framework of a long-range, comprehensive general plan prepared or being prepared to guide the overall future 9 development of the county.” Moreover, HRS §205A-26(2)(C) mandates that “No development shall be approved unless the authority has first found that the development is consistent with the county general plan, community plan and zoning, provided that a finding of consistency shall not preclude concurrent processing where a general plan, community plan or zoning amendment may also be required. The DEA fails to discuss and sufficiently explain: (1) how reviving the industrial zoning1 in this location provides “the most desirable use of land within the County that achieves an ecological balance providing residents and visitors the quality of life and an environment in which the natural resources of the island are viable and sustainable”? [2005 GP, Environmental Quality Goals, §4.2(a).] (2) how the “development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social, and cultural environments of the Island of Hawaii”? [2005 GP, §14.4.2 Industrial, Goals: (a) Designate and allocate industrial areas in appropriate proportions and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. (3) exactly how the applicant intends to mitigate the project’s adverse visual impacts on the view planes from nearby “extraordinary places of natural beauty”– the Wailoa River Area and Waiakea Fish Pond, (and the portion of the Hilo Bay trail system that is planned to pass through it), which are protected as a Place of Natural Beauty in the General Plan? [2005 General Plan, §7.5.2: South Hilo and Table 7-3. Natural Beauty Sites, District of South Hilo. Digital page 116. C.Hilo Community Development Plan The Hilo Community Development Plan which was adopted by the Planning Commission in 1975 recommends the area for Multiple Family Residential zoning at 1 14.4.2 Industrial, Goals: (a) Designate and allocate industrial areas in appropriate proportions and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. 10 a density of four (4) units per acre. It recommends Industrial area expansion at the airport mauka areas, and in-filling at the harbor and Kanoelehua Industrial areas. The DEA’s statement that the reasons supporting the FONSI determination includes that the project is consistent with the Hilo Community Development is wrong. The DEA fails to discuss and sufficiently explain: (1)Why Multiple Family Residential zoning is not a more appropriate zone designation? (2)Why a Multiple Family Residential project is not a more desirable alternative? D.The state and county Special Management Area Program. The DEA admits that site's proximity to Wailoa River Recreational Area and Waiakea Fishpond creates potentially adverse social, visual, and environmental impacts in the CZM area. [DEA digital page 121.] 1.HRS section 205A-26(2) HRS §205A-26(2) mandates that “No development shall be approved unless the authority has first found: (A) That the development will not have any significant adverse environmental or ecological effect, except as any adverse effect is minimized to the extent practicable and clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interests. Those adverse effects shall include but not be limited to the potential cumulative impact of individual developments, each of which taken by itself might not have a significant adverse effect, and the elimination of planning options; (B) That the development is consistent with the objectives, policies, and special management area guidelines of this chapter and any guidelines enacted by the legislature; and (C) That the development is consistent with the county general plan, community plan, and zoning; provided that a finding of 11 consistency shall not preclude concurrent processing where a general plan, community plan, or zoning amendment may also be required. The warehouse project conflicts with HRS §205A-2 Coastal zone management program; objectives and policies: (b) Objectives (5) Economic uses; (A) Provide public or private facilities and improvements important to the State's economy in suitable locations. (10) Marine and coastal resources; (A) Promote the protection, use, and development of marine and coastal resources to assure their sustainability. (c) Policies. (1)Recreational resources; (B) Provide adequate, accessible, and diverse recreational opportunities in the coastal zone management area by: (i)Protecting coastal resources uniquely suited for recreational activities that cannot be provided in other areas; (ii)Requiring restoration of coastal resources that have significant recreational and ecosystem value (3) Scenic and open space resources; (B) Ensure that new developments are compatible with their visual environment by designing and locating those developments to minimize the alteration of natural landforms and existing public views to and along the shoreline; (C) Preserve, maintain, and, where desirable, improve and restore shoreline open space and scenic resources; and (D) Encourage those developments that are not coastal dependent to locate in inland areas; 1447g FEASIBILITY STUDY -SUISAN COMPANY, LIMITED BACKGROUND The Hawaii County Council adopted Resolution No. 151-90 on March 23, 1990 which requested the Planning Director to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of redesignating the land areas identified as Tax Map Key 2-2-33:4, 11, 19 and 20 from Medium Density Urban to Industrial Area on the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LOPAG) Map. The lands involved are situated between the Hoolulu Park complex and Wailoa River State Recreation Area in Waiakea, City of Hilo, South Hilo, Hawaii. According to the County Real Property Tax Office, parcel 4 contains an area of approximately 5.29 acres and is owned by Bishop Estate. Parcels 11, 19 and 20, consisting a total area of approximately 2.04 acres, are owned by Toshiaki Shioda. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.The adoption of Resolution No. 151-90 is in support of the request made by Suisan Company, Limited to the County Council to redesignate the subject lands for industrial use to enable the company to eventually relocate their fish processing operation and back-up storage facilities to these properties. In support of the requested Industrial Area, the resolution states the following rationale: (SEE ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. 151-90) 0 ( STATE AND COUNTY PLANN[NG DOCUMENTS 2.The subject properties are classified Urban by the State Land Use Commission. 3.The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map designates the area as Medium Density Urban. This urban designation may include uses such as village and neighborhood commercial, residential and related functions (3 story commercial; residential--up to 35 units per acre). 4.The Hilo Community Development Plan which was adopted by the Planning Commission in 1975 recommends the area for Multiple Family Residential zoning at a density of four (4) units per acre. It recommends Industrial area expansion at the airport mauka areas, and in-filling at the harbor and Kanoelehua Industrial areas. 5.The County zoning designation is Resort-Hotel, Safety with 750 square feet of land area per unit (V-S-.75). 6.The subject area is situated within the Special Management Area (SMA) of the County of Hawaii. The objectives of the Coastal Zone Management (CZ M) Program, as expressed through Chapter 205A, HRS, and Rule 9 of the Hawaii County Planning Commission relating to SMA, are the protection of coastal recreational resources, historical and cultural resources, scenic values, coastal ecosystems and coastal dependent economic uses. An SMA Use Permit wou ld be necessary for the development of the subject area. PREVIOUS LAND USE ACTIONS 7.In 1985, the landowners of the subject properties submitted suggestions on land use changes to the Planning Director for consideration during the recent General Plan comprehensive review. -2- C 8.The Kamehameha Schools/Bishop Estate submitted a suggestion for General Plan revision from Resort and Open Area to High Density Urban, Medium Density Urban and Industrial designations for the area along Mililani and Manono Streets� adjacent to the Waiakea Village complex, Wailoa River State Recreation Area and across from the Hoolulu �ark complex. These properties were identified by Tax Map Key 2-2-31:10, 11, 12 and 14, and 2-2-33:4. The suggestion was submitted to allow for a mixed use of commercial, multi-family residential and light industrial activities on those properties. The Planning Director had recommended that the area mauka of Piilani Street and adjacent to the Waiakea Village complex be redesignated to High Density Urban and the area makai of Piilani and along Manono Streets be redesignated to Medium Density Urban. The Planning Director determined that the Industrial designation was inappropriate due to the scenic and recreational resources of the adjacent Wailoa River State Recreation Area as well as the mix of residential and commercial uses of the surrounding area. 9.Jack Ujimori, on behalf of Toshiaki Shioda, submitted a suggestion for a change from Resort and Open to Medium Density Urban for the area on the northeast corner of the intersection of Mililani and Piilani Streets. The properties involved were identified by Tax Map Key 2-2-33:11, 19 and 20. The suggestion was submitted in order to establish commercial activities which would benefit users of the Wailoa River State Recreation Park and the events at the Hoolulu Park complex as well as the residents in the area. The Planning Director had recommended that this area be also redesignated to Medium Density Orban. Subsequently in 1989, the County Council had -3- C G requested the Planning Director to reconsider designating this area for Industrial. While the subject area included some ongoing non-conforming industrial uses, the Planning Director determined that the Industrial designation for the area would be inappropriate due to the scenic and recreational resources of the Wailoa River State Recreation Area as well as the mix of residential and commercial uses of the surrounding area. 10.In consideration of the foregoing, the present General Plan Medium Density Urban designation for the area makai of Piilani Street, along Manono Street and adjacent to the Wailoa River State Recreation Area became effective on November 14, 1989 pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance No. 89-142, County of Hawaii General Pl an, by the Hawaii County Council. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY 11.The site is located adjacent to the Hooluiu Park complex and the Wailoa River State Recreation Area. More specifically, parcel 4 lies across the Hoolulu Park Complex fronting Manono Street and abuts portion of the Wailoa River State Recreation Area to the north, Bishop Estate lands on the west and State-owned lands on the south. The parcel is ove�grown with ve getation and presently vacant of any uses. 12.The area of parcels 11, 19 and 20 lies approximately 176 feet south of parcel 4 at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mililani and Piilani Streets. It also abuts bhe Bishop Estate lands to the west and the State lands to the east. Parcel 11 contains an existing nonconforming warehouse which is partially utilized by Hawaiian Sun Products, Inc. for fruit processing. Pa rcel 19 is -4- C C vacant of any structures or uses. Parcel 20 also contains an existing nonconforming warehouse but has collapsed and is vacant of any uses. 13.The two subject areas are separated by a proposed 60-foot wide road right-of-way (Wehilani Street) and a vacant 23,292 square foot parcel owned by Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. 14.The Soil Survey Report, prepared by the u.s. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, classifies the land as Keaukaha Series (rKFD) extremely rocky muck, 6 to 20 percent slopes. The soils consist of well-drained, thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. In a representative profile the surface layer is very dark brown muck about 8 inches thick. The soils above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable, but water moves rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. 15.The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) classifies a major portion of the subject site as Zone x, areas determined to be outside 500-year flood plain. A small portion along the northwest corner of parcel 4 is within the Special Flood Hazard Zone AE with base flood elevations ranging from 11 to 17 feet. Any development on the site would have to conform with the design and structure requirements of the County of Hawaii flood control ordinances. SURROUNDING LAND USE 16.Surrounding lands are also classified Urban by the State Land Use Commission. 17.Lands to the north and east of the subject site are designated by the LUPAG Map as Open Area, to the west and south are Medium -5- C Density Urban and lands to the southwest as High Density Urban. 18.General Plan Industrial designation is located along and extends eastward of Kanoelehua Avenue from Kalanianaole Avenue to Puainako Street. Industrial designation also parallels Kanoelehua Avenue on the west side along Kalanikoa Street, approximately 1,500 feet or three (3) blocks east of the subject site. Since 1970 there have been several industrial zone requests for lands in those areas which have being reviewed and approved by the County Council. 19.The Hi]o Community Development Plan recommends that the area to the west of the subject site be developed for multi-family residences so as the recreational amenities can be enjoyed by residents. It also recommends that lands to the north and east be kept in open space for recreational purposes. 20.The Hoolulu Park complex and Wailoa River State Recreation Area, situated to the north and east, are zoned Open. The properties to the south and southeast of the site are zoned General Commerciai-7,500 square feet (CG-7.5). Several retail stores, offices and restaurant establishments have been constructed in the area within the past ten years. Properties to the west and southwest are similarly zoned Resort-Hotel, Safety-.75 square feet (V-S-.75) and are presently vacant of any uses. The adjoining properties owned by the State and HELCO are also zoned Resort-Hotel, Safety-.75 square feet (V-S-.75). The state-owned parcel contains an existing dilapitated warehouse which is vacant of any uses. The HELCO parcel is vacant of any structures or uses. These zone designations have been in place since the adoption of the City of Hilo Zone Map in 1968. -6- C 21.The Waiakea Houselots which were created by the Territory of Hawaii in the early 1900's are generally zoned Single Family Residential and range from 10,000+ to 20,000+ square feet in size. The majority of the single family dwellings situated within this area are still habitable and are in �airly good condition. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND FAClLITIES 22.Access to the site is from Manono and Piilani Streets. Manono Street has a right-of�way width of 50 feet with a 34-foot pavement. Piilani Street is 60 feet wide with a 22-foot wide pavement. 23.All essential utilities are available to the subject area. -7- BILL NO. 668 ORDINANCE NO. _9_2_122 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-114 {CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 3, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM RESORT-HOTEL, SAFETY {V-5-.75) TO LIMITED INDUSTRIAL {ML-20) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 2-2-33:11, 12, 19 AND 20. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 25-114, Article 3, Chapter 25 {Zoning Code) of the Hawaii County Code, is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii, shall be Limited Industrial (ML-20): Beginning at the Northwest corner of this piece of land and at the Southeast corner of the intersection of Wehilani and Mililani Streets, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station "HALAI" being 496.51 feet North and 8,689.91 feet East, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1.270 °00' 2.0° 00' 200.00 feet along the South side of Wehilani Street; 560.00 feet along Government Land covered by General Lease 3419 and 3478 to Hawaiian Fern-Wood, Ltd.; 3 . 90 ° 00' 4.180 ° 00' 200.00 feet along the North side of Piilani Street; 560.00 feet along the East side of Mililani Street to the point of beginning and containing an area of 112,000 square feet. All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. This change in district classification is conditioned upon the following: (A) the applicant, its successors or assigns shall comply with all of the stated conditions of approval; {B) final consolidation approval of the subject properties shall be secured within one year from the effective date of the change of zone; (C) final plan approval for the proposed fish processing/ warehouse/office facility and related improvements shall be secured from the Planning Department within one year from the date of Final Consolidation Approval. To assure adequate time for plan approval review and in accordance with Chapter 25-244 (Zoning Code), plans shall be submitted a minimum of forty-five {45) days prior to the date for which plan approval must be secured. Plans shall indicate proposed structures, landscaping and parking associated with the proposed development; {D) construction shall commence· within one year from the date of receipt of Final Plan Approval and be completed within two years thereafter; (E) in the design and review of any improvements, due consideration shall be given to the minimization of noise and adverse visual impacts through appropriate siting, height, bulk, color schemes, -2- signage, and landscaping; (F) access to the project site shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works; (G)the method of sewage and solid waste disposal shall meet with the approval of the appropriate governmental agencies; (H)that portion of Piilani Street fronting the project site shall be improved to commercial standards. This improvement shall be constructed in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed development; (I) upon the development of parcels along the unconstructed portion of Mililani Street in the immediate vicinity of the subject properties, the applicant shall either participate in the construction of Mililani Street or a fair share contribution of its construction (280 feet) at a time and in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works; (J) a drainage system, if required, shall be installed meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works; (K) comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and requirements, including those of the Departments of Public Works, Health and Fire; (L) should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for the imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein may, at the developer"s election, be satisfied by performance in accordance with the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance; (M) an annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date of the effective date of this Change of Zone. The report -3- / / , , , V-!!!!J• -78 0 MILILANI MANONO 0 Ar'OO"'- - CHINEN C1'V1C J'I.U01TC�/UM F�NC19 NONC3 9TAOJUM 0 RE,,01"':tT-HOTEL,9.Ar-eT-Y (V-5-. 75 i TO L-JM ITe!C> INOUSTRTAl-(ML-"20) AREA.., Jl"2,000 S4Q.p=T- 0 0 3 YIIAt..TC.-R ID YICTO� ? 6TAOIUM AMENOtNCS 5ECT10H "2.S-114 (C1T'Y OF HtLO 'ZONE MAP) ARTteLe 3, CHAPTER "25 ('Z.OHrNG eooe) OF THe HAV'IA11 COUNT"Y cooe 19'"'?' CHANG1Ne THE C>IBTR1CT CLASS1F1CAT10N FROM �!!�ORT-HOTEL, 9At=ETY (V-S-.75, TO L1M1TEO INOUSTAtAL (ML-::20) AT INAIAKeA, SOUTH H1LO, HAt,l"iAII. PREPAl"lll.eo e-y � pLANNIN6 OS'PAR,MENT COUNT7' OJ"l HAV-.A 11 EXHIBIT •�• (SUJSAN COMPANY, LIMITEO) � I z 0 www.koaarchitects.com ● tel 808-217-6707 65-1285C Kawaihae Road Kamuela, HI 96743 Proud members of the American Institute of Architects and US Green Building Council DEA PUBLIC COMMENT RESPONSE TO: CLAUDIA ROHR 369 Nene St. Hilo, HI 96720 DATE: March 27, 2025 JOB NAME: Piilani Self Storage TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 Aloha, Thank you for your time and consideration and your review of our DEA for the new self-storage building at the intersection of Piilani and Mililani Streets in Hilo. We are striving to create a project that will be an attractive architectural element of this area and be of benefit to the local community and improve upon what has been the history of this parcel. Our proposed project is intended to provide a much-needed storage service to our Hilo residents and also offer good paying jobs at this facility. In response to your opinion of the adverse affects of our project, we respectfully note: (2) Curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment; +our proposed project expounds upon this underutilized vacant parcel, which has been cleared of all dumping and rubbish (3) Conflict with the State's environmental policies or long-term environmental goals established by law; +our proposed project does not conflict with environmental policies. In fact, we intend to improve upon the previous environment at this parcel (6) Involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities; +we cannot find any adverse secondary impacts – i.e. no population changes or any effect on public facilities (12) Have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and viewplanes, during day or night, identified in county or state plans or studies; +there are no existing scenic vistas or viewplanes that this proposed project would adversely affect. Per your review comment: The LUPAG designation for the subject property is medium density urban today and on the proposed 2045 General Plan maps. Therefore a general plan amendment will be required for consistency before development may be approved under HRS section 205A-26(2)(C). Our response: The General Plan (LUPAG) is only a reference. Furthermore, the new LUPAG has not been approved yet. 2 In Resolution No. 151-90, the Hawai‘i County Council previously stated that "the General Plan should not encourage residential developments to occur so close to the Wailoa River Estuary and tsunami safety zone," and further expressed that light industrial activities were considered a more appropriate use of the property at that time. Zoning changes and associated entitlements typically remain with the property, regardless of ownership changes, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the ordinance, which is not the case. If the ordinance does not specify that the zoning is contingent solely upon Suisan's ownership or operations, the current zoning designation remains applicable. The good thing about the proposed project is that it will become an asset to the area, is aesthetically beautiful, will produce low/no noise, will produce a much needed service to the community, will produce light traffic, and will provide jobs and economic value for the community, both during construction and thereafter. To reiterate, In Resolution No. 151-90, the Hawai‘i County Council previously stated that "the General Plan should not encourage residential developments to occur so close to the Wailoa River Estuary and tsunami safety zone," and further expressed that light industrial activities were considered a more appropriate use of the property at that time. We appreciate your concerns, and thank you for taking the time to address them to us. Matthew Kilgore AIA NCARB Koa Architects LLC From: Honda, Eric T. To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: PL-SMA-2025-000085 Date: Thursday, July 9, 2026 10:17:56 AM Attachments:PL-SMA-2025-000085 TMK2-2-033--011.pdf Eric Honda District Environmental Health Program Chief Hawai’I State Department of Health | Ka ‘Oihana Olakino 1582 Kamehameha Ave., Hilo HI 96720 Office: (808) 933-0917 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This mail message (and attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain confidential and/or privileged information. It might also be protected from disclosure under the Hawai’i Uniform Information Practice Act (UIPA) or other laws and regulations. Review, use, disclosure, or distribution by unintended recipients is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately in a separate e-mail and destroy the original message and any copies. JOSH GREEN, M.D. KENNETH S. FINK, M.D, MGA, MPH GOVERNOR OF HAWAII DIRECTOR OF HEALTH KE KIA’AINA O KA MOKU’AINA O HAWAI’I KA LUNA HO’OKELE STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P.O. BOX 916 HILO, HAWAII 96721-0916 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 9, 2026 TO: Mr. Jeffrey W. Darrow Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Eric Honda District Environmental Health Program Chief SUBJECT: Special Management Area Use Permit Application (PL-SMA-2025-000085) Applicant: Talon 1 Properties Request: To Construct and Operate a 3-Story, Approximately 98,500-Square-Foot Self Storage Warehouse with Associated Parking, Loading Areas, and Related Development TMK: 2-2-033:011, Waiākea, South Hilo, Hawaiʻi In most cases, the District Health Office will no longer provide individual comments to agencies or project owners to expedite the land use review and process. Agencies, project owners, and their agents should apply Department of Health “Standard Comments” regarding land use to their standard project comments in their submittal. Standard comments can be found on the Land Use Planning Review section of the Department of Health website: https://health.hawaii.gov/epo/landuse/. Contact information for each Branch/Office is available on that website. Note: Agencies and project owners are responsible for adhering to all applicable standard comments and obtaining proper and necessary permits before the commencement of any work. General summary comments have been included for your convenience. However, these comments are not all-inclusive and do not substitute for review of and compliance with all applicable standard comments for the various DOH individual programs. Clean Air Branch 1. All project activities shall comply with the Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Jeffrey W. Darrow July 9, 2026 Page 2 of 4 Chapters 11-59 and 11-60.1. 2. Control of Fugitive Dust: You must reasonably control the generation of all airborne, visible fugitive dust and comply with the fugitive dust provisions of HAR §11-60.1-33. Note that activities that occur near existing residences, businesses, public areas, and major thoroughfares exacerbate potential dust concerns. It is recommended that a dust control management plan be developed which identifies and mitigates all activities that may generate airborne and visible fugitive dust and that buffer zones be established wherever possible. 3. Standard comments for the Clean Air Branch are at: https://health.hawaii.gov/epo/landuse/ Clean Water Branch 1. All project activities shall comply with the HAR, Chapters 11-53, 11-54, and 11-55. 1. The following Clean Water Branch website contains information for agencies and/or project owners who are seeking comments regarding environmental compliance for their projects with HAR, Chapters 11-53, 11-54, and 11-55: https://health.hawaii.gov/cwb/clean-water-branch-home- page/cwb- standard-comments/. Hazard Evaluation & Emergency Response Office 1. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Phase II Site Investigation should be conducted for projects wherever current or former activities on site may have resulted in releases of hazardous substances, including oil or chemicals. Areas of concern include current and former industrial areas, harbors, airports, and formerly and currently zoned agricultural lands used for growing sugar, pineapple or other agricultural products. 2. Standard comments for the Hazard Evaluation & Emergency Response Office are at: https://health.hawaii.gov/epo/landuse/. Indoor and Radiological Health Branch 1. Project activities shall comply with HAR Chapters 11-39, 11-45, 11-46, 11-501, 11-502, 11-503, and 11-504. 2. Noise may be generated during demolition and/or construction. The applicable maximum permissible sound levels, as stated in Title 11, HAR, Chapter 11-46, “Community Noise Control,” shall not be exceeded unless a noise permit is obtained from the Department of Health. 3. Construction/Demolition Involving Asbestos: If the proposed project includes renovation/demolition activities that may involve asbestos, the applicant should contact the Asbestos and Lead Section of the Branch at https://health.hawaii.gov/irhb/asbestos/. Safe Drinking Water Branch Jeffrey W. Darrow July 9, 2026 Page 3 of 4 1. Agencies and/or project owners are responsible for ensuring environmental compliance for their projects in the areas of 1) Public Water Systems; 2) Underground Injection Control; and 3) Groundwater and Source Water Protection in accordance with HAR Chapters 11-19, 11-20, 11-21, 11-23, 11-23A, and 11- 25. They may be responsible for fulfilling additional requirements related to the Safe Drinking Water program: https://health.hawaii.gov/sdwb/. 2. Standard comments for the Safe Drinking Water Branch can be found at: https://health.hawaii.gov/epo/landuse/. Solid & Hazardous Waste Branch 1. Hazardous Waste Program - The state regulations for hazardous waste and used oil are in HAR Chapters 11-260.1 to 11-279.1. These rules apply to the identification, handling, transportation, storage, and disposal of regulated hazardous waste and used oil. 2. Solid Waste Programs - The laws and regulations are contained in HRS Chapters 339D, 342G, 342H, and 342I, and HAR Chapters 11-58.1 and 11-282. Generators and handlers of solid waste shall ensure proper recycling or disposal at DOH-permitted solid waste management facilities. If possible, waste prevention, reuse, and recycling are preferred options over disposal. The Office of Solid Waste Management also oversees the electronic device recycling and recovery law, the glass advanced disposal fee program, and the deposit beverage container program. 3. Underground Storage Tank Program – The state regulations for underground storage tanks are in HAR Chapter 11-280.1. These rules apply to the design, operation, closure, and release response requirements for underground storage tank systems, including unknown underground tanks identified during construction. 4. Standard comments for the Solid & Hazardous Waste Branch can be found at: https://health.hawaii.gov/epo/landuse/. Wastewater Branch For comments, please email the Wastewater Branch at doh.wwb@doh.hawaii.gov. Sanitation / Local DOH Comments: 1. According to HAR §11-26-35, No person, firm, or corporation shall demolish or clear any structure without first ascertaining the presence or absence of rodents that may endanger public health by dispersal from such premises. Should any such inspection reveal the presence of rodents, the rodents shall be eradicated before demolishing or clearing the structure. A demolition permit is required prior to demolition. Jeffrey W. Darrow July 9, 2026 Page 4 of 4 Other 1. CDC - Healthy Places - Healthy Community Design Checklist Toolkit recommends that state and county planning departments, developers, planners, engineers, and other interested parties apply these principles when planning or reviewing new developments or redevelopment projects. 2. If new information is found or changes are made to your submittal, DOH reserves the right to implement appropriate environmental health restrictions as required. Should there be any questions on this matter, please contact the Department of Health, Hawaii District Health Office, at (808) 933-0917. TO: DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAl'I 345 KEKUANAO'ASTREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAl'l 96720 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Director Planning Department July 24, 2026 COH PLANNING DEPT JUL 27 2026 PM2:42 REC'D HAND DELIVERED FROM: Keith K. Okamoto, Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Special Management Area Use Permit Application (PL-SMA-2025-000085) Request-To Construct and Operate a 3-Story, approximately 98,500-Square-Foot Self Storage Warehouse with Associated Parking, Loading Areas, and Related Development Change of Zone Amendment Application (PL-REZ-2026-000104) Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122 (Amend REZ 727) Request -Amend Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122 for a 5-Year Time Extension to Comply with Condition C (Final Plan Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction) Applicant -Talon 1 Properties Tax Map Key 2-2-033:011 We have reviewed the subject applications and have the following comments and conditions. Water can be made available from an existing 6-inch waterline within Pi'ilani Street fronting the subject parcel. The subject parcel was previously served by an existing 5/8-inch meter (Account No. 100-65700), which is adequate for only one (1) single-family dwelling, at an average usage of 400gallons per day (gpd). The Department has no objections to the proposed Special Management Area Use Permit application and 5-year time extension to comply with Conditions "C" and "D" of Ordinance No. 92-122, subject to the applicant understanding and accepting the following conditions: 1.Based on the information provided, the Department requests that the applicant submit water usagecalculations for the proposed uses, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State ofHawai' i, for review and approval. The water usage calculations should include the estimated peakflow in gallons per minute, and the total estimated average daily water usage in gallons per day.After reviewing the calculations, the Department will determine water system improvementsrequired for water service, applicable facilities charge due, and other conditions for final approval. 2.The proposed zoning will require the installation of a reduced pressure type backflow preventionassembly, by a licensed contractor, within five (5) feet of the meter on private property. If a larger ... Water, Our ?rfost <Precious <R.§source ... 'l(a Wai J1. 'l(iine ... The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Director Page 2 July 24, 2026 or additional meter is required, a backflow prevention assembly will also be required for that meter. The installation of the backflow prevention assembly(s)must be inspected and approved by the Department before commencement of water service. 3. Subject to other agencies' requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the property affected by the proposed development, the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities, should they be necessary. For your information, the existing 6-inch waterline within Pi`ilani Street and the existing 8-inch waterline within Manono Street are both inadequate to provide the required 2,000-gallons per minute of flow for fire protection, as per the Department's Water System Standards. Please be informed, this letter shall not be construed as a water commitment. In other words, unless a water commitment is officially issued, water availability is subject to change without notice. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Jacob Sakaguchi of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 260. Sincerely yours, Keith K. Okamoto Manager-Chief Engineer JS:dfg copy— Talon 1 Properties DWS Cross Connection Section From: Gonzalez, Tanner S To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: OPSD - PL-SMA-2025-000085 - 525 Piʻilani St, Hilo, Hawaiʻi Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 9:29:27 AM Attachments:Outlook-ln1zvxpp.png Outlook-2ei4b05j.png OPSD-Hawaii-Hilo-525 Piilani St-SMA_Final-Letter_26-7-21.pdf Good morning County of Hawaiʻi, Per the above referenced SMA comment request, please find the attached response letter from the State of Hawaiʻi Office of Planning & Sustainable Development (OPSD) - Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program. Should you have any questions or comments, please see the response instructions contained therein. Thank you and have a great day. Tanner Gonzalez Planner | Coastal Zone Management Program State of Hawaiʻi - Office of Planning & Sustainable Development (OPSD) 235 S Berentania St, 6th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813 P.O. Box 2359, Honolulu, HI 96804 Phone: (808) 587-2846 Website: https://planning.hawaii.gov OF JOSH GREEN, M. D.o-STATE OF HAWAII GOVERNOR v o i SYLVIALUKE LT. GOVERNOR OFFICE OF PLANNING o MARYALICEEVANS g•. od', DIRECTOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 235 South Beretania Street, 6th Floor, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Telephone: 808) 587-2846 Mailing Address: P. O. Box 2359, Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 Fax: 808) 587-2824 Web: https:Hplanning.hawaii.gov/ DTS202607071340MOCoastal zone Management Program July 21, 2026 Environmental Review Mr. Jeffrey W. Darrow, Director Planning Department Program Land Use Commission County of Hawai`i East Hawaii Office Land Use Division 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Special Plans Branch Hilo, Hawai` i 96720 State Transit-Oriented Attn: Alex RoyDevelopment Statewide Geographic Dear Mr. Darrow, Information System Subject: Special Management Area Use Permit Application PL-SMA-2025-Statewide Sustainaeility Branch 000085 to Construct and Operate a 3-Story, Self-Storage Warehouse with Associated Parking, Loading Areas, and Related Development Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai` i Tax 2-2-033: 011Map Key: ( 3) The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development( OPSD) is in receipt of your comment request, transmitted via memorandum dated July 7, 2026, on the Special Management Area( SMA) Use Permit Application PL-SMA-2025- 000085, to construct and operate a 3-story, self-storage warehouse with associated parking, loading areas and related development, in Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii. According to the subject SMA Use Permit application, the applicant' s proposal on a 2. 57-acre parcel is as follows: 0 3-story, approximately 98,500-square-foot self-storage warehouse with 264 individual storage units. o Seven 12' x50' loading zones and twenty-four full size parking stalls. o Extension of Mililani St, North of Pi` ilani St, to County of Hawaii dedication standards. o Extension of the County of Hawaii sewer line to the North from its terminus near the intersection of Mililani St and Pi` ilani St. Construction is anticipated to be completed within five years, and the estimated cost is $ 5, 000, 000. Mr. Jefffrey W. Darrow July 21, 2026 Page 2 The property was previously heavily vegetated, used for lumber treatment and warehousing, and contained trash and other debris before being cleared. On November 20, 1992, County of Hawaii Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122 became effective which changed the zoning of the subject property from Resort-Hotel-Safety-7, 500 square foot( V-S-7. 5) district to the Limited Industrial-20, 000 square feet( ML-20) zoning district, which allows for manufacturing, processing and storage uses. The entire property is located approximately 1, 969 feet away from the nearest coastline, outside the 3. 2-foot sea level rise exposure area, and within the Flood Zone " Y', areas outside the 500-year flood plain. The OPSD has reviewed the subject SMA Use Permit Application, and has the following comments to offer: 1. The OPSD recommends that the subject SMA Use Permit Application provides a location map to include the regional location of the project site on the Island of Hawaii, and a map to illustrate the parcel in relation to the County of Hawaii designated SMA. 2. The OPSD acknowledges that the request for a 5-year time extension to secure final plan approval and complete construction of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122 is highly justified for the proposed self-storage warehouse project given that the 5-year time extension was recommended for approval by the Windward Planning Commission on December 6, 2018, for the previously proposed bottling plant at the subject parcel. 3. As the supporting document, the subject SMA Use Permit Application frequently refers to the information provided by the Environmental Assessment( EA). The application should provide the weblink of the Final EA for the proposed Talon 1 Properties Self Storage Warehouse Project at https:// files. hawaii. gov/ dbedt/ erp/ Doc_ Library/ 2025-09- 08-HA-FEA-Talon-I-Self-Storage-Warehouse-Project.pdf for the application review. 4. If the proposed action disturbs one acre or more of land, or involves dewatering discharge activities, the applicant should consult with the Clean Water Branch, State of Hawaii Department of Health, for the requirement of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for the associated construction activities. 5. The subject property is vegetated and currently vacant. Low Impact Development LID), which consists of natural drainage design, including infiltration basins or trenches, rain gardens, green roofs, and vegetated filter strips, to preserve or enhance the natural hydrology of a place that existed prior to development, should be Mr. Jefffrey W. Darrow July 21, 2026 Page 3 considered. OPSD recommends the proposed development refer to LID Practitioner' s Guide for Hawaii when developing mitigation approaches for runoff control at https:// files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/czm/ormp/ormp implementation/2023LIDPractitioner sGuide. pdf If you respond to this comment letter, please include DTS202607071340MO in the subject line. For any questions regarding this letter, please contact Tanner Gonzalez of our office at( 808) 587- 2830 or by email at Tanner. S. Gonzalezghawaii._ gov Sincerely, 1 1 l0 A l l e.e_. ins Mary Ali Evans Director Damian, Jesse '.• From: Lebo, Susan A <susan.a.lebo@hawaii.gov> fJ; I.\[\'-.'.:\'.-....... -:-• -.. , ,__,. J. if· • -1 , !1-.. ·, _;r• "i::N.-Sent: r,,.... 1:-.. ·r 1 --.,-.. ..: • �. � • !._l I Monday, August 13, 2018 5:04 PM ,..,ul.,,1-. 1 r l)r 1-i;\Vv,'.,,i/ To: Planning Internet Mail; Kay, Christian; ahaun@haunandassociates.com; Dacayanan, Melissa Cc: aleimaile, Sean P Subject: Attachments: : (3) 2-2-033:011 3-2-2-033_2018-01269_1808SN02_ARCHY_6E42_AIS_ACCP.pdfHello, Attached is a pdf copy of our division's review of the following submittal: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review-Request for Revocation of SMA Permit No. 334 (SMA 92-000003) SMA Permit Application (SMA 18-000070) Request to Develop a Portable Water Well and Bottling Facility with Improvements Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92 122 (REZ 727) Request to Amend Condition C (Plan Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction) Archeological Inventory Survey of TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 Applicant: Piilani Partners, LLC (Formerly Suisan Co., Ltd.) Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island ofHawai'i TMK: (3) 2-2-033:011 Sincerely; Susan Susan A. Lebo, PhD Archaeology Branch Chief State Historic Preservation Division Department of Land and Natural Resources Kakuhihewa Building, Suite 555 Kapolei, HI 96707 (808)692-8019Susan.A.Lebo@hawaii.gov 1 11998.i ,·. Harry Kim Mayor William A. Kucharski Director Wilfred M. Okabe Managing Director Diane A. Noda Deputy Director Qruuntv nf �afuati DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AL MANAGEMENT 345 Kekiianiio'a Street, Suite 41 • Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Ph: (808) 961-8083 • Fax: (808) 961-8086 cohdem@co.hawaii.hi.us http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/environmental-management/ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Michael Yee, Director Planning Department �William A. Kucharski, Director • 1 Environmental Management Dep June 25, 2018 Special Management Area Use Permit No. 334 (SMA 92-000003) Request: Revocation of SMA Permit No. 334 Special Management Area Use Permit Application (SMA 18-000070) Request: To Develop a Potable Water Well and Bottling Facility with Related Improvements Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92-122 (REZ 727) Request: Amendment to Condition C (Plan Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction) Applicant: Piilani Partners, LLC (formerly Suisan Co., Ltd.) Tax Map Key: (3) 2-2-033:011 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Solid Waste Division for details): ( X ) No comments. ( ) Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. ( ) Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. ( ) Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. ( ) Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West Hawai'i Organics Facility and East Hawai'i Organics Facility, or other suitable diversion programs. ( ) Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. County of Hawal'i Is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 119180 "� <...-:..,-,_' F-' �- h_) I u-1 TO: FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HAWAII HILO, HAWAII gineering Division DATE: June 27, 2018 ��: �:� :n '3T _:; SUBJECT: SMA USE PERMIT No. 334 (SMA 92-000003) Request: Revocation of SMA Permit No. 334 ,;;;:::::-; ._._:, $� ....,_--..:-� ,C:::r,-, (J1 SMA USE PERMIT APPLICATION (SMA 18-000070) --� ..i:: Request: To Develop a Potable Water Well and Bottling Facility with Related Improvements AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORD. NO. 92 122 (REZ 727) Request: Amendment to Condition C (Plan Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction) Applicant: Piilani Partners, LLC (formerly Suisan Co., Ltd.) TMK: 2-2-033:011 We have reviewed the subject applications and have the following comments: We have no objections to the revocation of SMA Permit No. 334. We have no objections to the amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 92 122 to Condition C (Plan Approval) and Condition D (Complete Construction). Regarding the SMA Use Permit Application, SMA 18-000070, the subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and_ not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system shall be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. The portion of Piilani Street fronting the project site shall be improved to commercial standards to include but not limited to concrete sidewalks with curbs, gutters and drainage improvements. The portion of Mililani Street fronting the project site is considered a paper road and not currently constructed. Therefore, we recommend that the property owner at some time in the future be required to participate in the construction of Mililani Street or be required to pay their fair share contribution of the cost of construction of Mililani Street. Install streetlights and control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Questions may be referred to Robyn Matsumoto at 961-8924. 119248