HomeMy WebLinkAboutMulti-Hazard Mitigation Plan: Plan Review Crosswalk CIVIL DEFENSE AGENCY
COUNTY OF HAWAII
920 ULULANI STREET HILO,HAWAII 96720
r
f
LJ
23. Plan Review Crosswalk
-4L MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FOR REVIEW OF LOCAL MITIGATION PLANS
Attached is a Plan Review Crosswalk based on the Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance,published by FEMA in July,2008. This Plan Review
Crosswalk is consistent with the Robert T Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act(Stafford Act),as amended by Section 322 of the Disaster
Mitigation Act of 2000(P.L.106-390),the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968,as amended by the National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004(P.L.108-264)
and 44 Code of Federal Regulations(CFR)Part 201—Mitigation Planning,inclusive of all amendments through October 31,2007.
SCORING SYSTEM
N—Needs Improvement: The plan does not meet the minimum for the requirement. Reviewer's comments must be provided.
S—Satisfactory: The plan meets the minimum for the requirement. Reviewer's comments are encouraged,but not required.
Each requirement includes separate elements.All elements of a requirement must be rated"Satisfactory'in order for the requirement to be fulfilled and receive a
summary score of"Satisfactory." A"Needs Improvement"score on elements shaded in gray(recommended but not required)will not preclude the plan from
passing.
When reviewing single jurisdiction plans,reviewers may want to put an N/A in the boxes for multi-jurisdictional plan requirements.When reviewing multi-
jurisdictional plans,however,all elements apply. States that have additional requirements can add them in the appropriate sections of the Local Multi-Hazard
Mitigation Planning Guidance or create a new section and modify this Plan Review Crosswalk to record the score for those requirements. Optional matrices for
assisting in the review of sections on profiling hazards,assessing vulnerability,and identifying and analyzing mitigation actions are found at the end of the Plan
Review Crosswalk.
The example below illustrates how to fill in the Plan Review Crosswalk.:
Assessing Vulnerability: Overview
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph(c)(2)(i)of this section.
This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community.
Location in the
Plan(section or SCORE
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
N S
A. Does the new or updated plan include an Section II,pp.4-10 The plan describes the types of assets that are located within geographically defined
overall summary description of the hazard areas as well as those that would be affected by winter storms.
jurisdiction's vulnerability to each
hazard?
B. Does the new or updated plan address Section II,pp.10- The plan does not address the impact of two of the five hazards addressed in the plan.
the impact of each hazard on the 20 Required Revisions:
jurisdiction?
Include a description of the impact of floods and earthquakes on the assets.
Recommended Revisions:
This information can be presented in terms of dollar value or percentages of damage.
SUMMARY SCORE
J U L Y i , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M ) A- 1
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
Local Mitigation Plan Review and Approval Status
Jurisdiction: County of Hawaii Title of Plan: Date of Plan:
County of Hawaii Mult-Hazard Miti ation Plan Aril 2010
Local Point of Contact:Quince T.Mento Address:
Title:Administrator
Agency:Count of Hawaii Civil Defense Agency
Phone Number: 808 935-0031 E-Mail:gmento@co.hawaii.hi.us
State Reviewer:Dawn Johnson Title: Date:
FEMA Reviewer: Title: Date:
Diane Earl Plan Reviewer July 19,2010
Date Received in FEMA Region Insert#
Plan Not Approved X
Plan Approved
Date Approved
dFIRM Adopted Participating Risk Mitigation NFIP Status
in Ian? Assessment Action
Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N N NIA CRS
Jurisdiction: Class
1. Y Y Y Y Y Y
2.
3. [ATTACH PAGE(S)WITH
ADDITIONAL JURISDICTIONS
Notes: Y=Participating N=Not Participating N/A=Not Mapped
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 2
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
The plan cannot be approved if the plan has not been formally adopted. Each SCORING SYSTEM
requirement includes separate elements.All elements of the requirement must be Please check one of the following for each requirement.
rated"Satisfactory"in order for the requirement to be fulfilled and receive a score of
"Satisfactory."Elements of each requirement are listed on the following pages of the N-Needs Improvement: The plan does not meet the minimum for the
Plan Review Crosswalk. A"Needs Improvement"score on elements shaded in gray requirement.Reviewer's comments must be provided.
(recommended but not required)will not preclude the plan from passing. Reviewer's
comments must be provided for requirements receiving a"Needs Improvement" S-Satisfactory: The plan meets the minimum for the requirement.
score. Reviewer's comments are encouraged,but not required.
Prerequisite(s)(Check Applicable Box) NOT MET MET Mitigation Strategy N S
1. Adoption by the Local Governing Body: X 13.Local Hazard Mitigation Goals:§201.6(c)(3)(i)
§201.6(c)(5) OR
14.Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions:
§201.6(c)(3)(ii)
2. Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption:§201.6(c)(5) NIA 15. Identification and Analysis of Mitigation
AND Actions: NFIP Compliance.§201.6(c)(3)(ii)
3. Multi-Jurisdictional Planning Participation:§201.6(a)(3) NIA 16. Implementation of Mitigation Actions: X
§201.6(c)(3)(iii)
17. Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Actions: NIA
Planning Process N S §201.6(c)(3)(iv)
4. Documentation of the Planning Process:§201.6(b)
and§201.6(c)(1) Plan Maintenance Process N S
18. Monitoring,Evaluating,and Updating the Plan:
Risk Assessment N S §201.6(c)(4)(ii)
19. Incorporation into Existing Planning
5. Identifying Hazards:§201.6(c)(2)(i) X Mechanisms:§201.6(c)(4)(ii)
6. Profiling Hazards:§201.6(c)(2)(i) 20.Continued Public Involvement:§201.6(c)(4)(iii) X
7. Assessing Vulnerability: Overview:§201.6(c)(2)(ii) X
8.Assessing Vulnerability: Addressing Repetitive Additional State Requirements` t* S
Loss Properties.§201.6(c)(2)(11)
9. Assessing Vulnerability: Identifying Structures, Insert State Requirement
Infrastructure,and Critical Facilities: 201.6 c 2 ii B X
§ O( )()O Insert State Requirement
10. Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential Losses:
§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B) X Insert State Requirement
11. Assessing Vulnerability: Analyzing Development X
Trends:§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C)
12. Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment:§201.6(c)(2)(iii) NIA LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN APPROVAL STATUS
PLAN NOT APPROVED EEI
'States that have additional requirements can add them in the appropriate sections of
the Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance or create a new section and See Reviewer's Comments
modify this Plan Review Crosswalk to record the score for those requirements. PLAN APPROVED
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) See`Summary of Significant Plan Revisions 3
Subsequent to FEMA July 23,2010 Crosswalk."
LOCAL MITIGATION P
PREREQUISITE(S)
1. Adoption by the Local Governing Body
Requirement§201.6(c)(5): [The local hazard mitigation plan shall include]documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of
the jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan(e.g.,City Council,County Commissioner, Tribal Council).
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or NOT
Element annex and page# Reviewer's Comments MET MET
A. Has the local governing body adopted new See August 16,2010 The updated plan must be adopted by the County of Hawaii.
or updated plan? Approval Required Revision: Adoption by the County of Hawaii. X
B. Is supporting documentation,such as a See August 16,2010 Required:County Resolution documentation.
resolution,included? Approval Required Revision:Documentation of adoption of the April 20 X
IO plan by the County of Hawaii.
SUMMARY SCORE
2. Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption
Requirement§201.6(c)(5): For multi jurisdictional plans,each jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan must document that it has been forma ly adopted.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or NOT
Element annex and a e#) Reviewer's Comments MET MET
A.Does the new or updated plan indicate the N/A
specific jurisdictions re resented in the Ian?
B. For each jurisdiction,has the local governing N/A
body adopted the new or updated Ian?
C.Is supporting documentation,such as a resolution, N/A
included for each participating jurisdiction?
SUMMARYSCORE
3. Multi-Jurisdictional Planning Participation
Requirement§201.6(a)(3): Multi jurisdictional plans(e.g.,watershed plans)may be accepted,as appropriate,as long as each jurisdiction has participa ed in
the process...Statewide plans will not be accepted as multi jurisdictional plans.
SCORE
Location in the Plan(section NOT
Element or annex and page# Reviewer's Comments MET MET
A. Does the updated plan document how the planning team NIA
reviewed and analyzed this section of the plan and
whether this section was revised as part of the update
process?
B. Does the new or updated plan describe how each N/A
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 4
jurisdiction participated in the plan's development?
C. Does the updated plan identify all participating
jurisdictions,including new,continuing,and the
jurisdictions that no longer participate in the Ian?
SLIMMARYSCORE
N/A
PLANNING PROCESS: §201.6(75): An open public involvernen1 process is essenlial to the developmeru of an ejjeclive plan.
4.Documentation of the Planning Process
Requirement§201.6(b): In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters,the planning process shall include:
(1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval;
(2) An opportunity for neighboring communities,local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities,and agencies that have the authority to
regulate development,as well as businesses,academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process;and
(3) Review and incorporation,if appropriate,of existing plans,studies,reports,and technical information.
Requirement§201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document]the planning process used to develop the plan,including how it was prepared,who was involved in the
process,and how the public was involved.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the plan provide a narrative description of the Chapter 2 Element satisfied in Chapter 2 X
process followed to prepare the new or updated plan?
B. Does the updated plan document how the planning Chapter 1 Element discussed in Chapter 1,Appendix A.This Appendix
team reviewed and analyzed each element of this Appendix A discusses the overall reorganization of the 2010 Plan.It addresses
section of the plan and whether this section was revised the updates and revisions in the updated 2010 plan.
as part of the update process?
Referenced Although it contains a good description of this element;there is a
sentence is portion missing in the 4n,section which states,"Each hazard-
completed. specific chapter discusses previous/current mitigation efforts and
future mitigation plan activities,so that specific recommendations
are focused on each hazard.These recommendations are then----
--" that is where it ends.They need to finish the sentence. X
Recommended Revision:
• Complete the above referenced sentence.
• Provide a more detailed statement of how the planning
team reviewed each element of the plan.
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A-5
�ATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
4.Documentation of the Planning Process
Requirement§201.6(b): In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters,the planning process shall include:
(1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval;
(2) An opportunity for neighboring communities,local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities,and agencies that have the authority to
regulate development,as well as businesses,academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process;and
(3) Review and incorporation,if appropriate,of existing plans,studies,reports,and technical information.
Requirement§201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document]the planning process used to develop the plan,including how it was prepared,who was involved in the
process,and how the public was involved.
Location in the SCORE
C. Does the new or updated plan indicate who was Chapter 2, Element satisfied in Chapter 2
involved in the current planning process? (For section 2.1.1
example,who led the development at the staff level and
were there any external contributors such as
contractors?Who participated on the plan committee,
provided information,reviewed drafts,etc.?
D. Does the new or updated plan indicate how the public Chapter 2, Element addressed in Ch 2 Mitigation Planning.
was involved? (Was the public provided an opportunity Section 2.1.2
to comment an the plan during the drafting stage and There is a lot of discussion about various public venues;however,
prior to the plan approval?) the only substantial documentation I could find is a Survey.The
narrative and/or the Survey do not show figures as to how many
people responded to the survey.As far as I could tell by looking at
the graphical sampling of the results is that one question received
the most responses and the total who answered that question was
1,111 respondents.That is LESS than 1%of the island's residents
(175,784).
There is a good analysis of the survey;response may be low
based on the population,however,the data collected yields
useable information for Mitigation Actions.
Recommend Revision: X
• P.2-3 states there is a draft available for review on the
State website.The link is broken;upload the approved
plan on the State website.
• Hawaii County Resident Survey:Could use more
information on the number of people who filled out the
surveys.The number of respondents varies widely with
each question.
E. Does the new or updated plan discuss the Chapter 2 narrative discusses agencies,academia and various
opportunity for neighboring communities,agencies, interested parties,but does not discuss businesses or X
businesses,academia,nonprofits,and other interested nonprofits(e.g.the Pacific Tsunami Museum).It does state that
parties to be involved in the planning process? the American Red Cross was involved.
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A-6
�ATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
4.Documentation of the Planning Process
Requirement§201.6(b): In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters,the planning process shall include:
(1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval;
(2) An opportunity for neighboring communities,local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities,and agencies that have the authority to
regulate development,as well as businesses,academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process;and
(3) Review and incorporation,if appropriate,of existing plans,studies,reports,and technical information.
Requirement§201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document]the planning process used to develop the plan,including how it was prepared,who was involved in the
process,and how the public was involved.
Location in the SCORE
Recommended Revision:
• Include any representation from the private sector such as
the hotel industry or other businesses that have been
involved with the planning process.
• Recommend briefing the Chamber of Commerce,health
care and retail sectors.
F. Does the planning process describe the review and Several plans and studies have been reviewed and portions
incorporation,if appropriate,of existing plans,studies, incorporated into this plan.Specifically—Hawaii State Drought
reports,and technical information? Plan,County of Hawaii General Plan,Hurricane Flood X
Insurance Study,Structural Assessment of Buildings for
Hurricane Shelter Classifications and ASCE 7-10.
SLIMMARYSCORE
RISK ASSESSMENT: y201.6(c)(2): The plan shall include a risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce losses
from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the.jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation
actions to reduce losses from identified hazards.
5.Identifying Hazards
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the type...of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1,Appendix,pgs.Al-1 through A1-5 provides a good
how the planning team reviewed and description of the review and updates.
analyzed this section of the plan and X
whether this section was revised as
part of the update process?
B. Does the new or updated plan Chapter 4,Section 4.1 Each Hazard is described and discussed in depth in separate
include a description of the types of Chapter 5,Section 5.1 chapters.
all natural hazards that affect the
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) X 7
jurisdiction? Chapter 6,Section 6.1
Chapter 7,Section 7.1
Chapter 8,Section 8.1
Chapter 9,Section 9.1
Chapter 10,Section 10.1
Chapter 11,Section 11.1
Chapter 12,Section 12.1
Chapter 13,Section 13.1
Chapter 14,Section 14.1
Chapter 15,Section 15.1
Chapter 16,Section 16.1
Chapter 17
SLIMMARYSCORE
6.Profiling Hazards X
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the...location and extent of all natural hazards that can affect the
jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page# Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A meets this requirement.
how the planning team reviewed and
analyzed each element in this section
of the plan and whether any was
revised as part of the update
process?
B. Does the risk assessment identify the Chapter 4,Section 4.1 Well described in each hazard's chapter.
location(i.e.,geographic area Chapter 5,Section 5.3.2
affected)of each natural hazard Chapter 6,Section 6.1.1,Section 6.4 Recommended Revision:
addressed in the new or updated Chapter 7,Section 7.1,Section Landslides:Figure 6-3 is hard to read.Include an 11/17
plan? 7.3.1.1,Section 7.3.1.2 sized map.
Chapter 8,Section 8.1.1,Section Dam Failure:There are 13 dams included in the list for the
8.3.1 Island of Hawaii;however,Figure 11-1 shows just 11.
Chapter 9,Section 9.3.2 Include the additional two dams.
Chapter 10,Section 10.1.2,Section Coastal Erosion:Location could be discusses more
10.3.1 substantially in narrative.
Chapter 11,Section 11.1 X
Chapter 12,Section 12.2
Chapter 13,Section 13.1
Chapter 14,Section 14.3.1
Chapter 15,Section 15.3
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A-8
C. Does the risk assessment identify the Chapter 4,Section 4.4 Magnitude or severity is described for Hurricane,Landslides and
extent(i.e.,magnitude or severity)of Chapter 5,Section 5.3.2 Rock Falls,Earthquakes,Lava and Vag,Tsunami,Floods,High
each hazard addressed in the new or Chapter 6,Section 6.3 Surf,Drought.
updated plan? Chapter 7,Section 7.3.1 Recommended Revision:
Chapter 8,Section 8.3.1 Ch.11 Dams-Briefly described in narrative.Mapping done
Chapter 9,Section 9.3.2 by Pacific Disaster Center could be added to further
Chapter 10,Section 10.3.1 illustrate actual scenarios of dam failures in Hawaii County.
Chapter 11,Section 11.2 Ch.13 Coastal Erosion is not a major risk so extent is not
Chapter 12,Section 12.2 addressed.Suggest inclusion of cliff erosion that has
Chapter 13,Section 13.2 impacted structures in the past. X
Chapter 14,Section 14.2 Ch.15 Wildfires-briefly discussed.Expand to include a
Chapter 15,Section 15.2 detailed narrative or map.
D.Does the plan provide information on Chapter 4,Section 4.2 Previous occurrences for all hazards are discussed,some in more
previous occurrences of each Chapter 5,Section 5.2 detail than others.If there have been no occurrences of a specific
hazard addressed in the new or Chapter 6,Section 6.2 hazard since 2007,i.e.,high winds,hurricanes and wildfires,make
updated plan? Chapter 7,Section 7.2 a statement to that effect in each of the appropriate chapters.
Chapter 8,Section 8.2 Recommended Revision:
Chapter 9,Section 9.2 Landslides:List the year the occurrence(s)occurred in
Chapter 10,Section 10.2 Figure 6-6
Chapter 11,Section 11.2 Lava:State if there has been no occurrence(s)since 2005
Chapter 12,Section 12.2 Tsunami:The information is from 1975.If there are more
Chapter 13,Section 13.2 recent occurrence(s),include this information.
Chapter 14,Section 14.2 Flooding:Update Figure 10-3 X
Chapter 15,Section 15.2 Dam Failure:Delete information related to Kauai's dam
failures or provide a statement of how this information is
Current Drought conditions are relative to the County of Hawaii.
discussed. Drought:include more recent occurrence if applicable.
E. Does the plan include the probability Chapter 4,Section 4.3 Probability of future events is discussed for High Wind Storms,
of future events(i.e.,chance of Chapter 5,Section 5.3 Hurricane,Landslides and Rock Falls,Earthquakes,Lava and
occurrence)for each hazard Chapter 6,Section 6.3 Vog,Tsunami,Floods,Dam Failures,High Surf,Coastal Erosion,
addressed in the new or updated Chapter 7,Section 7.3 Drought,Wildfires.
plan? Chapter 8,Section 8.3 Recommended Revisions:
Chapter 9,Section 9.3 Dam Failure:The HMP discusses it in terms of Hawaii State;
Chapter 10,Section 10.3 provide a narrative or discussion specifically for the County
Chapter 11,Section 11.3 of Hawaii.
Chapter 12,Section 12.3 Coastal Erosion:discusses probability of future events in a
Chapter 13,Section 13.3 general way;provide a narrative or discussion specifically X
Chapter 14,Section 14.3 for the County of Hawaii.
Chapter 15,Section 15.3 Drought&Wildfire probabilities should include more detail.
SUMMARYSCORE
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) X A-9
7.Assessing Vulnerability: Overview
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph(c)(2)(i)
of this section. This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A meets this requirement.
how the planning team reviewed and
analyzed each element in this section
of the plan and whether any was
revised as part of the update
process?
B. Does the new or updated plan Executive Summary The summary descriptions of vulnerability to each hazard are quite
include an overall summary Chapter 18,Sections 18.1,18.2 varied in the detail;a few chapters indicate specific vulnerability to
description of the jurisdiction's Chapter 18,Section 18.3.3 the hazard discussed;others have indications of vulnerability
vulnerability to each hazard? scattered throughout the text.The plan would be much more"user
friendly"if there were a consistent statement of vulnerability within
each chapter.
Recommended Revision:
• Provide a statement/discussion/narrative for each hazard
within the specific chapter that clearly states the County of
Hawaii's vulnerability to the hazard.
• Coastal Erosion and Wildfire should have additional X
information that states vulnerability to these hazards.
• Include a discussion of historical/cultural areas in the
vulnerability statements.
C.Does the new or updated plan Chapter 4,Section 4.4 Hazard impact is not included for all hazards.
address the impact of each hazard Chapter 5,Section 5.4
on the jurisdiction? Chapter 6,Section 6.5 Required Revision:
Chapter 7,Section 7.4 The information for the impact of dam failures on pg.11-7 is
Chapter 8,Section 8.4 generic to the State of Hawaii.There must be a discussion
Chapter 9,Section 9.4 of the impact of dam failure specific for the County of
Chapter 10,Section 10.3.1 Hawaii.This could be inferred from the provided information;
however,the requirement is for the jurisdiction of this plan.
Chapter 11,Section 11.4 X
Chapter 12,Section 12.4 Wildfire information is inadequate.Again,most of it is for the
Chapter 13,Section 13.4 State of Hawaii and not specific to the County of Hawaii.
Chapter 14,Section 14.4
Chapter 15,Section 15.4
• See revised section 11.5.2.2
and new Figure 11-9.
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A- 10
• See revised Chapter 15 which
has Hawaii County specific
information and mitigation
actions further developed by the
Hawaii Wildfire Management
Or anization.
SUMMARYSCORE X
B. Assessing Vulnerability: Addressing Repetitive Loss Properties
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment]must also address National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)insured structures that have been
repetitively damaged floods.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the Ch.10 Floods satisfies this element,well done.
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section
was revised as part of the update rocess?
B.Does the new or updated plan describe Chapter 10,Section 10.3.1.2 Ch.10 Floods satisfies this element. X
vulnerability in terms of the types and See 10.3.1.1 NFIP Flood Insurance Profile for Hawaii County.
numbers of repetitive loss properties X
located in the identified hazard areas? Note:This requirement becomes effective for all local
plans approved after October 1,2008.
SUMMARYSCORE
9. Assessing Vulnerability: Identifying Structures X
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A): The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of existing and future buildings,infrastructure,and
critical facilities located in the identified hazard area....
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A meets this requirement.
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section
was revised as part of the update rocess?
B. Does the new or updated plan describe Chapter 5,Section 5.5.1.1 This element is addressed in Ch 5,Ch 7,Ch 8,and Ch 18. X
vulnerability in terms of the types and Chapter 7,Section 7.4
numbers of existing buildings,infrastructure, Chapter 7,Section 7.5.1 Note: A"Needs Improvement"score on this requirement will X
and critical facilities located in the identified Chapter 8,Section 8.4 not preclude the plan from passing.
hazard areas? Chapter 18,Sections
18.1.7,18.1.8,18.3.3
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 11
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CF
C. Does the new or updated plan describe Chapter 3,Section 3.3.1 This element is discussed in Ch 3 and Ch 17.
vulnerability in terms of the types and Chapter 17,Section 17.3 Note: A"Needs Improvement"score on this requirement will
numbers of future buildings,infrastructure, Chapter 17,Section 17.4 not preclude the plan from passing. X
and critical facilities located in the identified
hazard areas?
SUMMARY SCORE X
10.Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential Losses
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(8): [The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of an]estimate of the potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures
identified in paragraph(c)(2)(ii)(A)of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate....
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A meets this requirement.
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section X
was revised as part of the update process?
B. Does the new or updated plan estimate Chapter 7,Section 7.4 This element is discussed in Ch 7,Section 7.4;Ch 8,Section 8.4;
potential dollar losses to vulnerable Chapter 8,Section 8.4 Ch 18,Sections 18.1.7,18.1.8(University of Hawaii)and 18.3.3
structures? Chapter 18,Sections X
18.1.7,18.1.8,18.3.3 Note: A"Needs Improvement"score on this requirement will
not preclude the plan from passing.
C.Does the new or updated plan describe the Chapter 5,Section 5.4 This element is satisfied in Ch 5,section 5.4;Ch 8,Section 8.4;
methodology used to prepare the estimate? Chapter 8,Section 8.4 and Ch 18,Sections 18.1.7,18.1.8,and 18.3.3
Chapter 18,Sections X
18.1.7,18.1.8,18.33 Note: A"Needs Improvement"score on this requirement will
not preclude the plan from passing.
SUMMARYSCORE X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 12
CRC
11.Assessing Vulnerability:Analyzing Development Trends
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C): (The plan should describe vulnerability in terms oq providing a general description of land uses and development trends
within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and pa e# Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the See updated Chapter 3, There is no documentation as to how the planning team reviewed,
planning team reviewed and analyzed this Section 3.4 analysis for this analyzed and/or revised each element in this section.
section of the plan and whether this section statement. Required revision:
was revised as part of the update process? Provide a statement which describes how the planning team X
reviewed the vulnerability of any development trends to the
identified hazards.Recommend reviewing FEMA How-To-Guide
42(FEMA 386-2)
B. Does the new or updated plan describe land Chapter 3,Sections 3.1, This element is satisfied in Chapter 3 and Chapter 18.
uses and development trends? 3.2,3.3 X
Chapter 18,Section 18.3 Note: A"Needs Improvement"score on this requirement will
not preclude the plan from passing.
SUMMARYSCORE X
12.Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(iii): For multi jurisdictional plans,the risk assessment must assess each jurisdiction's risks where they vary from the risks facing the
entire planning area.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and a e# Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the N/A
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section
was revised as part of the update process?
B.Does the new or updated plan include a risk N/A
assessment for each participating jurisdiction
as needed to reflect unique or varied risks?
SUMMARYSCORE
N/A
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 13
L MITH
MITIGATION STRATEGY: §201.6(e)(3): The plan shall include a mitigation strategy that provides the jrnisdiction's hlueprintfijr reducing the potential losses
identified ht the risk assessment,based on existing authorities,policies,programs and resources,and its ahility to expand on and improve these existing tools.
13.Local Hazard Mitigation Goals
Requirement§201.6(c)(3)(i): [The hazard mitigation strategy shall include a]description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the
identified hazards.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and a e# Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A satisfies this requirement.
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section
was revised as part of the update rocess?
B.Does the new or updated plan include a Chapter 19,Section 19.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals are listed in Ch 19,Section 19.1 X
description of mitigation goals to reduce or
avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the
identified hazards?
SUMMARYSCORE X
14.Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions X
Requirement§201.6(c)(3)(ii): [The mitigation strategy shall include a]section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions
and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard,with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and a e# Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A satisfies this requirement.
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section
was revised as part of the update rocess?
B.Does the new or updated plan identify and Chapter 4,Section 4.5.2 Ch.19 section 19.1 lists Mitigation Goals and Objectives X
analyze a comprehensive range of specific Chapter 5,Section 5.5.2 Section 19.2 discusses Mitigation Actions by category(i.e.,
mitigation actions and projects for each Chapter 6,Section 6.5.2 prevention,property protection,public education and
hazard? Chapter 7,Section 7.5.2 awareness,etc.
Chapter 8,Section 8.5.2 In Sections 19.2.10-19.2.7 specific hazards(Hurricanes and
Chapter 9,Section 9.5.2 Wind Storm,Earthquakes,Tsunamis,Rainfall Flooding and
Chapter 10,Section 10.4.2 High Waves,Lava Flows,Droughts and Wildfires and
Chapter 11,Section 11.5.3 Landslides and Sea Cliff Erosion)are discussed.
Chapter 12,Section 12.5 X
Chapter 13,Section 13.5 Ch.17-is dedicated totally to shelters.
Chapter 14,Section 14.5.2
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A- 14
Chapter 15,Section 15.5.1
Chapter 16,Section
Chapter 17,Section 17.5
Chapter 19,Section 19.2 and
19.4
C.Do the identified actions and projects Chapter 5,Section 5.5.2 This element is satisfied in Ch 5(Tropical Cyclone),
address reducing the effects of hazards on Chapter 9,Section 9.5.2 Section 5.5.2;Ch 9(Tsunami),Section 9.5.2,and Ch 17
new buildings and infrastructure? Chapter 17,Section 17.5 (Shelters),Section 17.5. X
Chapter 19,Section 19.4
Chapter 19,Section 19.5
D. Do the identified actions and projects Chapter 5,Section 5.5.2 This element is satisfied in Ch 5(Tropical Cyclone),
address reducing the effects of hazards on Chapter 17,Section 17.5 Section 5.5.2 and Ch 17(Shelters),Section 17.5. X
existing buildings and infrastructure? Chapter 19,Section 19.4 19.5 Mitigation Actions also satisfies this element.Nicely
Chapter 19,Section 19.5 done.
SUMMARYSCORE
15.Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions: National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)Compliance X
Requirement:§201.6(c)(3)(ii): [The mitigation strategy]must also address the jurisdiction's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP),and
continued compliance with NFIP requirements,as appropriate.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and a e#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A satisfies this requirement.
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section
was revised as part of the update process?
B. Does the new or updated plan describe Chapter 10,Section 10.4.1.1 This element is satisfied in Ch 10,Section 10.4.1.1 X
the jurisdiction(s)participation in the Note:This requirement becomes effective for all local
NFIP? mitigation plans approved after October 1,2008.
X
Recommended Revision:
• Explicitly state that the County of Hawaii is a NFIP
participant.
C.Does the mitigation strategy identify, Chapter 10,Section 10.3.1 This element is satisfied in Ch 10,Section 10.3.1 and
analyze and prioritize actions related to Section 10.4.1.1 Section 10.4.1.1
continued compliance with the NFIP?
Note:This requirement becomes effective for all local
mitigation plans approved after October 1,2008.
SUMMARYSCORE
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) X 15
16.Implementation of Mitigation Actions
Requirement:§201.6(c)(3)(iii): [The mitigation strategy section shall include]an action plan describing how the actions identified in section(c)(3)(4)will be
prioritized,implemented,and administered by the local jurisdiction. Prioritization shall include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized
according to a cost benefit review of the proposed projects and their associated costs.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and a e#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A satisfies this requirement.
planning team reviewed and analyzed this
section of the plan and whether this section
was revised as part of the update rocess?
B.Does the new or updated mitigation strategy Chapter 19,Section 19.4 Ch 19,Section 19.4 addresses mitigation strategies X
include how the actions are prioritized?(For and how the actions were prioritized.The STAPLE-E X
example,is there a discussion of the process process was used.
and criteria used?
C.Does the new or updated mitigation strategy Chapter 19,Section 19.5 Ch 19,Section 19.5 Implementation Actions satisfies
address how the actions will be implemented this element.
and administered,including the responsible
department,existing and potential resources
and the timeframe to complete each action?
D.Does the new or updated prioritization Chapter 18,Sections 18.1.7,18.3.3 Ch 18,Sections 18.1.7 and 18.3.3 and Ch 19,
process include an emphasis on the use of a Chapter 19,Section 19.4 Section 19.4 satisfy this element. X
cost-benefit review to maximize benefits?
E.Does the updated plan identify the Executive Summary xiv to xviiii The mitigation strategy,actions and implementation
completed,deleted or deferred mitigation Chapter 4,Section 4.5.1 plan in Chapter 19 are excellent.I do not find any
actions as a benchmark for progress,and if Chapter 5,Section 5.5.1 reference to the review of the 2007 plan mitigation
activities are unchanged(i.e.,deferred),does Chapter 6,Section 6.5.1 actions or comments as required in this element.
the updated plan describe why no changes Chapter 7,Section 7.5.1
occurred? Chapter 8,Section 8.5.1 Required Revision:
Chapter 9,Section 9.5.1 Provide a table/narrative/discussion of
Chapter 10,Section 10.4.1 completed,deleted or deferred mitigation X
Chapter 11,Section 11.5.2 actions as an indication of progress.
Chapter 14,Section 14.5.1 . If the activities are unchanged,provide a
statement as to why.
See new Section 19.5 Discussion of
Past Implementation Actions,and
editorially revised Section 19.6
Present Implementation Actions.
SLIMMARYSCORE X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 16
17.Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Actions
Requirement§201.6(c)(3)(iv): For multi jurisdictional plans,there must be identifiable action items specific to the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or
credit of the plan.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page# Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the planning team
reviewed and analyzed this section of the plan and whether
this section was revised as part of the update process?
B.Does the new or updated plan include identifiable action
items for each jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval of
the Ian?
C. Does the updated plan identify the completed,deleted or
deferred mitigation actions as a benchmark for progress,
and if activities are unchanged(i.e.,deferred),does the
updated plan describe why no changes occurred?
SUMMARY SCORE
PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCESS N/A
18. Monitoring,Evaluating,and Updating the Plan
Requirement§201.6(c)(4)(i):[The plan maintenance process shall include a]section describing the method and schedule of monitoring,evaluating,and
updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and a e#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the planning team Chapter 1 Appendix Chapter 1—Appendix A satisfies this requirement.
reviewed and analyzed this section of the plan and whether A
this section was revised as part of the update process?
B. Does the new or updated plan describe the method and Chapter 20 The HMP Committee will meet on a semi-annual basis.
schedule for monitoring the plan,including the responsible The HMP Committee will include members from each X
department? county agency or department.
C.Does the new or updated plan describe the method and Chapter 20 The semi-annual reports will enable the Planning
schedule for evaluating the plan,including how,when and by committee to participate in an annual workshop which X X
whom(i.e.the responsible department)? I will serve as an evaluation tool measuring the progress.
D.Does the new or updated plan describe the method and Chapter 20 Annual briefing will be conducted with semi-annual X
schedule for updating the plan within the five-year cycle? reports.
SUMMARYSCORE
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) X 17
19. Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms
Requirement§201.6(c)(4)(ii):[The plan shall include a]process by which local governments incorporate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other
planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans,when appropriate.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the planning team
reviewed and analyzed this section of the plan and whether X
this section was revised as part of the update process?
B. Does the new or updated plan identify other local planning The table in Chapter 20,pg 20-2 satisfies this
mechanisms available for incorporating the mitigation requirement.
requirements of the mitigation Ian?
C.Does the new or updated plan include a process by which As above.Nicely described.
the local government will incorporate the mitigation strategy Process for monitoring projects in described on pg 20- X
and other information contained in the plan(e.g.,risk 1.
assessment)into other planning mechanisms,when
appropriate?
D. Does the updated plan explain how the local government As above. X
incorporated the mitigation strategy and other information X
contained in the plan(e.g.,risk assessment)into other
planning mechanisms,when appropriate?
SUMMARYSCORE
X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 18
20. Continued Public Involvement
Requirement§201.6(c)(4)(iii): [The plan maintenance process shall include a]discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan
maintenance process.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page# Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the updated plan document how the planning team See revised Chapter There is no information as to how the planning team
reviewed and analyzed this section of the plan and whether 20 for completion of reviewed this section of the plan.Pg.Al-5.#20,states
this section was revised as part of the update process? the revision. that the Plan Maintenance chapter is presently being
revised.Has this been completed?
Required Revision: X
• Provide a discussion that describes how this section
of the plan was reviewed and analyzed for updating
to the 2010 plan.
B.Does the new or updated plan explain how continued Chapter 20 The Plan Update Procedures on pg.20-3 reference public
public participation will be obtained?(For example,will awareness community-based workshops and symposia.It
there be public notices,an on-going mitigation plan is unclear if these are intended as education or public
committee,or annual review meetings with stakeholders?) participation in the planning process.
Required Revision: X
• Provide information regarding how the
public/community will be continually involved with
the plan update process.
SUMMARYSCORE X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) 19
-4L MITIGATION PLAN R
MATRIX A:PROFILING HAZARDS
This matrix can assist FEMA and the State in scoring each hazard. Local jurisdictions may find the matrix useful to ensure that their plan addresses each natural
hazard that can affect the jurisdiction. Completing the matrix is not required.
Note: First,check which hazards are identified in requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i). Then,place a checkmark in either the N or S box for each applicable
hazard. An"N"for any element of any identified hazard will result in a"Needs Improvement"score for this requirement. List the hazard and its related
shortcoming in the comments section of the Plan Review Crosswalk.
Hazard Type Hazards Identified C. Previous D. Probability of
Per Requirement A. Location B. Extent Occurrences Future Events
201.6 c 2 i
Yes N S N s N s N S T
Avalanche C/i b
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ occk 1) o xes \
Coastal Erosion ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® Change th t he bpX o4b/e 1.
Coastal Storm ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® \- to.. a defa4/t and
Dam Failure ® E] ® E] ® El ® E] E] Checked"Va 14e
Drought ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ®
Earthquake ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Expansive Soils ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Levee Failure ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Flood ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Hailstorm ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Hurricane ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Land Subsidence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Landslide ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ❑
Severe Winter Storm ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Tornado ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Tsunami ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Volcano ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Wildfire ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Windstorm ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Other Shelters ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Volcanic Gas ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑
Other HAZMAT ® ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Legend:
§201.6(c)(2)(i)profiling Hazards
A. Does the risk assessment identify the location(i.e.,geographic area affected)of each hazard addressed in the new or updated plan?
B. Does the risk assessment identify the extent(i.e.,magnitude or severity)of each hazard addressed in the new or updated plan?
C. Does the plan provide information on previous occurrences of each natural hazard addressed in the new or updated plan?
D. Does the plan include the probability of future events(i.e.,chance of occurrence)for each hazard addressed in the plan?
JULY 1 , 2008 (WIDFIRM) A-20
TIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
MATRIX B:ASSESSING VULNERABILITY
This matrix can assist FEMA and the State in scoring each hazard. Local jurisdictions may find the matrix useful to ensure that the new or updated plan addresses
each requirement. Completing the matrix is not required.
Note: First,check which hazards are identified in requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i). Then,place a checkmark in either the N or S box for each applicable hazard. An
"N"for any element of any identified hazard will result in a"Needs Improvement"score for this requirement. List the hazard and its related shor.q no in the
comments section of the Plan Review Crosswalk. Note: Receiving an N in the shaded columns will not preclude the plan from passing. r—,/ r�
r,ehee
Hazards A.Overall A.Types and Number B.T s and e cA-
Identified Per Summary B. Hazard of Existing Structures Number of Future char rhehe boxan bre
A. Loss Estimate B. Methodolo y to.,c o'e fa tl
Hazard Type Requirement Description of Impact in Hazard Area Structures in Hazard hee�ed�rV a%e
§201.6(c)(2)(1) Vulnerability Estimate Area Estimate w \
Yes N S N S N S N S I N S N S
Avalanche ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ — ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Coastal Erasion ® v ❑ ® ❑ ® m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Coastal Storm ® 2 ❑ E ❑ ® a ❑ S ❑ ❑ a ❑ S ❑ S
Dam Failure E O' ❑ E ❑ E - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Drought ® 2 ❑ ® ❑ ® c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Earthquake ® - ❑ E ❑ S a ❑ E ❑ ❑ E ❑ S ❑ S
Expansive Soils ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Levee Failure ® 3 ❑ ® ❑ ® ? ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Flood ® s ❑ ® ❑ ® ❑ E ❑ ❑ _ ❑ S ❑ S
Hailstorm ❑ 5 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Hurricane S ❑ S ❑ S > ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ S
Land Subsidence ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Landslide E _ ❑ E ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Severe Winter Storm E ❑ E ❑ E ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Tornado ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ G ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Tsunami E ❑ E ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Volcano E ❑ E ❑ E _ ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ E
Wildfire S ❑ E ❑ S ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Windstorm S ❑ E ❑ S ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Shelters E ❑ E ❑ E ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
other Volcanic Gas ® ❑ S ❑ E ❑ S ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other HAZMAT S ❑ E ❑ S ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Legend:
§201.6(c)(2)(ii)Assessing Vulnerability:Overview
A. Does the new or updated plan include an overall summary description of the jurisdiction's B. Does the new or updated plan describe vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of
vulnerability to each hazard? future buildings,infrastructure,and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas?
B. Does the new or updated plan address the impact of each hazard on the jurisdiction?
§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B)Assessing Vulnerability:Estimating Potential Lasses
§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A)Assessing Vulnerability: Identifying Structures A. Does the new or updated plan estimate potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures?
A. Does the new or updated plan describe vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of B. Does the new or updated plan describe the methodology used to prepare the estimate?
existing buildings,infrastructure,and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas?
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A-21
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
MATRIX C:IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION ACTIONS
This matrix can assist FEMA and the State in scoring each hazard. Local jurisdictions may find the matrix useful to ensure consideration of a range of actions for
each hazard. Completing the matrix is not required.
Note: First,check which hazards are identified in requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i). Then,place a checkmark in either the Nor S box for each applicable hazard. An
"N"for any identified hazard will result in a"Needs Improvement"score for this requirement. List the hazard and its related shortcoming in the comments section
of the Plan Review Crosswalk.
Hazards Identified A. Comprehensive
Per Requirement Range of Actions To
Hazard Type 201.6 c 2 i and Pro'ects �l heck
Yes N S (� ch rck,c box QS,
Avalanche ❑ ❑ ❑ �_
an the de bo,anb 1.
Coastal Erosion ® ❑ ® �"the kea.,V d
Coastal Storm ® ❑ ® Ckety„ dl4e
Dam Failure
® ❑
Drought ® ❑
Earthquake ® ❑
Expansive Soils ❑ ❑ ❑
Levee Failure ® ❑
Flood ® ❑
Hailstorm ❑ ❑ ❑
Hurricane ® ❑
Land Subsidence ❑ ❑ ❑
Landslide ® ❑
Severe Winter Storm ® ❑
Tornado ❑ ❑ ❑
Tsunami ® ❑
Volcano ® ❑
Wildfire ® ❑
Windstorm ® ❑
Other Shelters ® ❑
other Volcanic Gas— ® ❑
Other HAZMAT ® ❑
Legend:
§201.6(c)(3)(ii)Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions
A. Does the new or updated plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects for
each hazard?
JULY 1 , 2008 (WIDFIRM) A-22
Chapter 23:Plan Review Crosswalk
Summary of Significant Plan Revisions
Subsequent to FEMA July 23, 2010 Crosswalk
Section/Chapter Revision
Executive Summary . Description of Section 406(2)of the Stafford Act clarified
• Change to Plan Update and Maintenance chapter is
described
1. Introduction . Appendix A: Overall reorganization and reformatting of the
2010 plan recommendation in Chapter 19
• Changes to the new Plan Maintenance chapter described
2. Mitigation Planning Minor editorial corrections
3. Land Use and . Section on Economy-Agriculture discussion
Development . Section of Analysis of Development Trends impacting
hazard mitigation planning is added
5. Tropical Cyclones . Reference added to Figure 5-2
• Future Plans—Hawaii Residential Safe Room discussion is
updated for new mitigation project
11. Dam Failure . Figure numbers are corrected
• Section on PDC Dam Failure Inundation Map Project and
Future Plans are updated relating to hazard mitigation
measures
14. Droughts . Discussion of current drought conditions is added to the
Section on Significant Historic Events Table 14-2
• Future Plans Projects are updated
15. Wildfires • Discussion of recent wildfires is added to Significant
Historic Events
• A new section on Community Wildfire Protection Plans is
added
• Section on Mitigation Strategies is updated and completed as
of 2010,and establishes priorities
17. Shelters Future Mitigation Plans are updated for anew 2010 project follow-
up for the Hawaii Residential Safe Room
19. Mitigation Strategy . Section 19.5 discusses the status of past implementation
actions listed in the 2005 plan.
• Section 19.6 is editorially revised to indicate actions that are
similar or continuations of the 2005 plan actions
20. Plan Update Procedures The revised approach to Chapter 20 is explained.Elaborated
information is given by other anticipated work in the next 1 to 4
years(in addition to the specific maintenance checklist).
21. References Updated list
23. Plan Review Crosswalk The responses to the July 23,2010 FEMA Crosswalk Review is
given, along with this summary of significant changes to the Final
Plan.
Hawaii County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan