HomeMy WebLinkAboutTimeline and Workgroups County of Hawaii
Comprehensive Strategy Timeline
Timeline
November 2000 Community leaders from throughout the Island of Hawaii
were convened for an orientation.
January 2001 Mayor Harry Kim welcomed OJJDP staff and
consultants and committed his support for the
Comprehensive Strategy effort.
Hawaii County Legislators were briefed on the concepts
and benefits of the Comprehensive Strategy during the
opening weeks of the Legislature.
Key government, business and civic leaders were
convened for a Comprehensive Strategy orientation
session.
March 2001 Two-day Comprehensive Strategy Community Planning
Team Orientation held. The team structure was created
and members were assigned to each of the workgroups.
May 2001 Two-day workshop held for team members on
Community Assessment Training.
June 2001 Workgroups convened independently to work on
assignments.
July 2001 Team members met to review data findings. Four risk
factors were selected as priority for Hawaii County.
Technical assistance was provided by OJJDP
consultants to each workgroup for assistance in
preparing reports.
August 2001 Workgroups convened independently to complete
reports for the Community Assessment Report (CAR).
October 2001 Draft-2 of CAR presented to planning group.
Community Planning Training (CPT) workshop
conducted to develop strategic plan.
February 2002 CAR completed and presented to planning group.
CPT — 2 workshop held to evaluate gaps identified in the
CAR and prioritize strategies and best practices from the
planning group for inclusion in the plan.
Comprehensive Strategy Sub-Committees
• Data Collection and Analysis Workgroup
The primary tasks of the Data Collection and Analysis Workgroup are: (1)
developing a statistical and demographic data profile of the community, (2)
conducting an analysis of data sources and accessibility, and (3) analyzing
the data to identify priorities and key issues to be addressed by other work
groups.
• Resource Assessment Workgroup
The resource assessment workgroup is responsible for collecting
information about existing prevention and graduated sanction programs.
The workgroup will identify key issues and gaps related to the programs
and make recommendations for addressing the gaps and issues.
• Objective Decisionmaking Workgroup
The role of the objective decisionmaking workgroup is to map the current
juvenile justice system to identify the critical decision points and document
the current decisionmaking processes (objective, multidisciplinary teams,
subjective recommendations, staff expertise, etc.) used at each decision
point. The workgroup should identify who makes the
decision/recommendations and what data are collected and used at each
decision point, with particular attention to duplication in data collection,
variations in definitions of terms, and time required to complete each
process. This is not an inventory of the programs or options, but of the
processes by which youth are placed or moved through the system.
• Legislative/Policy/Systems Issues Workgroup
The legislative/policy/systems issues workgroup is responsible for (a)
reviewing and recommending changes to State and local laws and policies
related to all stages along the CS continuum, (b) assessing and making
recommendations related to information sharing and management
information systems among relevant agencies and organizations, and (c)
reviewing and making recommendations regarding case management
functions currently in place.
• Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation Workgroup
The planning, monitoring, and evaluation workgroup is responsible for
integrating all the issues and recommendations provided by the data
collection and analysis, resource assessment, objective decisionmaking,
and legislative/policy/systems issues workgroups. Based on the
recommendations and issues identified by these groups, the planning,
monitoring, and evaluation workgroup will develop a cohesive 5-year
comprehensive strategy plan and report. The report will include a prioritized
set of recommendations, specific goals and outcomes to measure success,
and a proposed timeline for implementing the prioritized recommendations.
• Outreach/Communication//Media Workgroup
The outreach/communication/media (external relations) workgroup is
responsible for (a) engaging community leaders and stakeholders
(including youth) in the process, (b) recruiting and training new members to
the planning board, (c) "selling" the CS to the greater community, and (d)
educating and updating community leaders, stakeholders, and the public
about the work of the planning board. The workgroup will work with the
other workgroups to prepare and disseminate all press releases, draft and
final documents, and other communications with the public.
• Youth Involvement Workgroup
The Youth involvement workgroup is made up of high school freshmen,
sophomore, junior, and senior students from various schools in Hawaii
County. Their goal is to articulate the youth perspective regarding the
juvenile justice system. This is accomplished through holding focus groups
on the issues impacting today's youths and conducting surveys to obtain
the opinions of their peers. Recommendations are then made by the
workgroup on how the system can be improved and are incorporated into
the comprehensive strategic plan.