HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-03-20 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
KAILUA VILLAGE DESIGN COMMISSION
COUNTY OF HAWAI‘I
MINUTES
Meeting Date: March 20, 2012
Time: 5:20 p.m.
Place: West Hawai‘i Civic Center
nd
Planning Department Conference Room – Building E, 2 Floor
74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway
Kailua-Kona, Hawai‘i, 96740
CALL TO ORDER
Commissioners Present: Shane Kitchens, Theresa Andreae, Fanny Au Hoy, Nancy Burns,
Stephen Herbert, John Hetherington and Sammie Stanbro
Absent and Excused: Riley Saito
Applicants/Representatives: Chad Raymond
Planning Department: Bennett Mark, Keola Childs and Noriko Sauer
Public: None
A quorum was present. Chair Kitchens called the meeting to order and the Commissioners
introduced themselves.
STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS
– None.
The Chair suggested that the Commission reorder the agenda and take up the New Business first.
There were no objections.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Design review of a sign permit application for a replacement marquee sign for RadioShack.
Applicant: John Allen Sign Company, LLC. Land Owners: Pres-Kona Coast LP and
Queen Lili‘uokalani Trust. TMK: 7-4-015:001. Located in the Kona Coast Shopping
Center at 74-5586 Palani Road, Kailua-Kona, on the northwest corner of Queen
Ka’ahumanu Hwy. and Palani Road.
Mr. Childs oriented the Commissioners regarding the subject and surrounding properties on the
location map and site plan, and described the proposed sign. He handed out to the Commissioners a
picture showing the existing marquee sign, which would be replaced. He noted that although the sign
area, lettering size, and type of material used did not follow the Sign Code or the signage guidelines
in the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona, the proposed sign did comply with the 1999 blanket sign
variance granted for the entire shopping center.
The applicant’s representative, Chad Raymond, introduced himself. In response to Commissioner
Andreae’s question, he said that the reason for the design change was to update the sign to match the
new company logo. Mr. Childs added that the company name, which had been “Radio Shack” with a
space in between, was now spelled as one word, “RadioShack.” Commissioner Andreae further
asked whether the proposed sign was in line with the other signs in the shopping center.
1
Commissioner Stanbro pointed out size consistency in particular, even though the proposed sign was
in compliance with the variance. However, no comparison information was available at that moment.
It was moved by Commissioner Hetherington, and seconded by Commissioner Burns, to recommend
to the Public Works Director the approval of the proposed sign as submitted. A roll call vote was
taken and the motion carried with six ayes (Hetherington, Burns, Andreae, Au Hoy, Herbert and
Stanbro), and one absent and excused (Saito).
2. Design Review of a sign variance application for a wall sign for Goodyear Auto Service
Center. Applicant: Goodyear Auto Service Center No. 8021. Landowner: Queen
Lili‘uokalani Trust. TMK: 7-4-015:010. Located in the Kailua Industrial Subdivision at
74-5488 Kaiwi Street, Kailua-Kona.
Mr. Childs oriented the Commissioners regarding the subject and surrounding properties on the
location map and site plan, and described the proposed sign and variance application. He also
distributed recent pictures of the subject property to the Commissioners. He noted that the applicant
could be expected to revise its application to add a variance also from Section 3-59(a)(4), as the
proposed mounting height appeared to exceed the limit set forth.
Mr. Chad Raymond represented the applicant.
Commissioner Burns said that she was having a problem with considering any sign applications
because of lack of enforcement; it seemed wrong for the Commission to deny any application from
someone trying to comply with the Sign Code, while there were many businesses that were allowed
to go on with illegal signs. Commissioner Andreae opined that it was prudent for the Commission to
make recommendations as to what should be acceptable or unacceptable in the Kailua Village.
Commissioner Hetherington said that even though the Commission was not the final decision-making
body, it was given the power to make recommendations and it should use that power consistently.
Regarding the subject sign, Commissioner Stanbro said that it should be looked at proportionally to
the building rather than by itself, and that accordingly the proposed size seemed acceptable. She
suggested, however, that the spacing between letters could be reduced in order to make the overall
area smaller, if necessary. Mr. Raymond responded that the applicant was very strict about their
corporate branding, which included the letter spacing.
Mr. Mark mentioned that changes in letter height restrictions were being proposed in amendments to
the Sign Code in progress. Commissioner Burns said that uniform height restrictions were not
practical in the Kailua Industrial Subdivision due to various building sizes and shapes in the district.
Mr. Childs gave a brief history of the Kailua Industrial Subdivision being incorporated into the
Kailua Village design district, and said that it had been subject to the more permissive County-wide
provisions of the Sign Code until then. Commissioner Au Hoy pointed out that the reason for the
incorporation was because the community wanted to clean up the area, and that they had not been
successful in achieving the objective because no enforcement was taking place. Commissioner
Stanbro commented that there might be a way to appropriate sign application fees for enforcement
personnel. Mr. Raymond said that more businesses would comply, if code restrictions were realistic.
Commissioners were in agreement that considering the size and architecture of the building, as well
as the setback from the street, the size of the proposed sign was acceptable, that the proposed
mounting height was appropriate for visibility to motorists where the primary traffic was vehicular,
2
and that all other signs, including banners, on the subject property should be taken down. The Chair
commented that a clean, in-compliance look in the midst of the impermissible signage clutter might
actually work to the applicant’s advantage in public relations, and that that would also give the
Commission a good example to point at to other applicants. He also suggested that the applicant
testify in front of the County Council.
It was moved by Commissioner Hetherington, and seconded by Commissioner Herbert, to
recommend to the Public Works Director that the sign variance application be approved as presented,
subject to the condition that no other signs or banners shall be kept on the subject property. A roll
call vote was taken and the motion carried with six ayes (Hetherington, Herbert, Andreae, Au Hoy,
Burns and Stanbro), and one absent and excused (Saito).
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
1. Approval of Minutes of the Meeting of March 6, 2012.
It was moved by Commissioner Burns and seconded by Commissioner Au Hoy that the minutes be
approved as submitted. The motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote of all Commissioners in
attendance.
Commissioner Burns asked about the status of the Sign Code Review Committee, which had been
formed on September 27, 2011, with Commissioners Burns, Dunlap, Hetherington and Kitchens as
its members. (Commissioner Dunlap who was to chair the Committee has since resigned from the
Commission.) The Chair requested the staff to place the matter on a future meeting agenda, so that
the Commission could: 1) disband the current Committee, and 2) form a new one.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mr. Childs made the following announcements:
The new sign permit application referral form that was mentioned at the last meeting is being
finalized and will be implemented shortly.
rd
The April 3 meeting is cancelled since no applications were received by the due date. There is a
thth
possibility that the following meeting may be rescheduled from April 17 to either April 10 or
th
April 24 due to staff schedule conflicts.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at 7:05 p.m., it was moved by Commissioner Hetherington and
seconded by Commissioner Au Hoy that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was unanimously
carried by a voice vote of all Commissioners in attendance.
Respectfully submitted,
A T T E S T:
Noriko Sauer, Secretary
Shane Kitchens, Chair
Kailua Village Design Commission
3