Laserfiche WebLink
Communication No. 2014-66 <br /> September 9, 2014 <br /> TO: Sea View Estate Residents Petitioning CL 931 <br /> FROM: Marlene Hapai, Chairperson, Puna Community Development Plan(PCDP) <br /> Connectivity and Emergency Response Subcommittee <br /> VIA: Patti Pinto, Chairperson, PCDP Action Committee <br /> RE: Connectivity Location 931 connecting Kamoamoa to One Ele presented in the <br /> Emergency Response Subcommittee of the Puna Community Development Plan <br /> Report on Prioritized Connectivity Locations, May 13, 2014 <br /> Dear Sea View Estate Residents, <br /> Our Puna Community Development Plan Subcommittee on Connectivity and Emergency <br /> Response met Tuesday, August 26, 2014 to discuss the petitions emailed to us on August 7, <br /> 2014. <br /> Under discussion was Connectivity Location 931 Kamoamoa to One Ele located in Sea View Estates. <br /> Two petitions were received dated August 7, 2014. The first petition, signed by 103 residents of SeaView <br /> Estates, stated CL 931 would not be welcomed by Sea View Estate residents as it would bring much <br /> unwanted traffic into the subdivision. The petition further asked that it be removed from the CL priority <br /> list before the PREP Fair on August 30,2014. <br /> As the present Connectivity Prioritization list is a snapshot in time,presented in a document submitted to <br /> the Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee dated May 13,2014,to be updated each year <br /> taking account viability of suggestions made and further community input,the list will remain as shown <br /> in the May 13th document,but the request to be removed from the list as written in the petition will be <br /> reflected on the Community Comments section at the PREP Fair and will be acknowledged in the 2015 <br /> update. <br /> A second petition submitted with the first suggested an alternate route as well as alternate services. 76 <br /> residents signed this,the smaller number reflecting those that did not want any additional roads in the <br /> area. The additional services and road maintenance do not fit within the parameters of this subcommittee, <br /> but it is recommended that the alternate connection be clarified if this is one the residents want considered <br /> so it can be added to the suggestions provided thus far by the Puna community. <br /> Please be aware that the Subcommittee's report is a compilation of the suggestions received from <br /> communities and individuals all over Puna and reflects the desire of the people to have more than <br /> one way to safely access and evacuate their communities. <br /> Points of connectivity that have been suggested by the community will be further evaluated for <br /> feasibility and community support/opposition. You have clarified substantial reasons to avoid <br /> this route and your comments will become a permanent part of the Subcommittee's 2015 report. <br />