Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 26, 2015 FINAL SC MinutesWilliam P. Kenoi Mayor County of Hawaii PLANNING DEPARTMENT Duane Kanuha Director Bobby Command Deputy Director HAMAKUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone (808) 961-8288 • Fax (808) 961-8742 Saturday, September 26, 2015 Meeting Minutes CALL TO ORDER: Vice -Chairperson Farrah -Marie Gomes called the Hamakua Community Development Plan (HCDP) Steering Committee to order at 8:46 a.m. at the Papa`ikou Community Center in Papa`ikou. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Brad Kurokawa, Farrah -Marie Gomes, Glenn Carvalho, Lorraine Mendoza, and Craig Neff. Members Absent: Ku`ulei Badua, Scott Enright, Jason Moniz, and Ka`iulani Pahi`6. Staff. LeAna Gloor — Hamakua CDP Project Manager, Planner, Ron Whitmore — Hawai`i County Planner, Keiko Mercado — Hamakua CDP Planning Assistant, and Bob Agres — HACBED. Members of the public: 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Kurokawa moved to accept the February 3, 2015 minutes as submitted. Second by Ms. Mendoza. Motion passed with S votes aye and 0 votes nay. MEETING OVERVIEW: Ms. Gomes (Vice -Chair) provided an overview of the meeting, including an explanation of the purpose and scope of the CDP, the roles of the Steering Committee, and the meeting agenda. The purpose and scope of the CDP is as follows: • Implement the broad goals within the General Plan on a regional basis [and] translate the broad General Plan statements to specific actions. • Serve as the forum for community input into... coordinating the delivery of government services to the community. • Direct land use, zoning, growth, development and design. • Plan for watersheds and other natural features. • Direct public improvements, including infrastructure, public facilities, transportation, drainage, and recreation. The roles and responsibility of the Steering Committee continue to be: • To help the County tailor the planning process to the unique characteristics of Hamakua and its stakeholders. Hawai `i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Page I 1 • Promote the planning process within the community to maximize participation while maintaining an objective, approachable posture in the community. • Monitor the development of the CDP to ensure that the best interests of the Hamakua region as a whole are incorporated. Role of the Steering Committee during this Draft Review Workshop: • Maintain an objective viewpoint throughout the review process; • Understand the contents of the CDP; • Verify the CDP draft represents the Community's Vision and Objectives; • Suggest revision of policies as appropriate; • Prepare to answer questions and help community members navigate and understand the CDP; • Prepare to have an active role in Phase 2, the Community Review Process Ms. Gloor went over the timeline and next steps for the Hamakua CDP pointing out key decision points: • Affirm the draft CDP strategies for community review; • Review community input; • Recommend approval of CDP Ms. Gloor introduced Bob Agres from HACBED who will be working as the facilitator during this review phase and the community review phase that follows. Mr. Agres outlined the process for the Steering Committees Review of the Preliminary Working Draft: • Step 1 will consist of a review of the preliminary strategies. The September 26, 2015 and October 10, 2015 meetings are dedicated to ensuring that Steering Committee members have a complete understanding of the "Preliminary Working Draft" CDP. These meetings will include presentations, questions from the Steering Committee, and short activities to assess members' understanding. The presentations will provide an overview of the "Preliminary Working Draft" CDP, including sections focused on: o The types of CDP strategies, their legal applicability, and roles in their implementation o How the draft CDP strategies were identified o Draft strategies related to community infrastructure and services, including water, roads, mass transit, emergency facilities and services, solid waste, schools, libraries, and parks o Draft strategies related to economic development, including regional coordination, workforce development, local purchasing, agriculture, renewable energy, payment for ecosystem services, health and wellness, education and research, visitors, and retail o Draft strategies to advance preferred conservation and settlement patterns, including the land use policy map, land use permitting, and commercial, industrial, and resort areas o Draft strategies for natural and cultural resource management, including the expansion of preserves, ecosystem management, cultural resource management, access and trail management, and land use policy to protect coastal areas, agricultural land, scenic areas, and mauka forests Steering Committee concerns, suggestions for improvement, areas for discussion, and requests for additional information or stakeholder input will be logged and saved for Step 2 (Discussion and consideration of potential revisions, affirmation of the revised Draft CDP for Community Review, and agreement on the Community Review Process.) Page 12 Ms. Gomes reviewed the Aloha Etiquette and opened the floor to public testimony. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: There was no public comment at this time. BUSINESS: Overview of the "Preliminary Working Draft" of the Hamakua CDP: Ms. Gloor reiterated that the goal of this agenda item is to ensure that all Steering Committee members have a complete understanding of the "Preliminary Working Draft" CDP and reminded the Steering Committee that the CDP was developed through extensive community and stakeholder engagement which resulted in the following documents: • Hamakua Community Profile (2010) • Values and Vision Statement (2011) • Hamakua proposed Strategies for Consideration (2011) • Community Objectives (2013) • Draft Analysis Documents (2014) Ms. Gloor continued by explaining the three documents the Steering Committee would be using during the meeting: • CDP Draft — Concise document that includes all the strategies • CDP Rationale Document — More comprehensive document that includes the Policies and Kokua Actions with their explanations — but does not include Community Actions • CDP Community Action Guide — Includes the Community Actions and background information to help the community implement the actions. Ms. Gloor emphasized that this is a preliminary working draft and that revisions are expected based on Steering Committee feedback as well as Community feedback. She went on to provide a detailed explanation of the structure and navigation of the Draft CDP document, using a projected electronic version. Ms. Gloor emphasized the importance of Section 2, Applicability, which states the purpose of the CDP, the CDPs relationship with the Hawaii County General Plan, the types of strategies that govern the CDP, and their roles in implementation. There are two types of County Policies: • Land Use Polices — the official land use policy guidance for the Hamakua CDP planning area and shall be implemented though all County of Hawaii actions. • County Actions — the official County policies to guide future County priorities and initiatives, including operating and capital budgets. Because none of the Hamakua Community Objectives can be achieved by the County alone, there are two additional types of Strategies: • Kokua Actions — actions that would help advance CDP Objectives, but are within the jurisdiction of non -County governmental agencies or other entities. • Community Actions — community-based, collaborative actions are initiatives that must be led by the community with support from a broad range of organizations and agencies. Section 5 Overview Mr. Agres outlined the process — after Ms. Gloor provides an overview of Section 5, the SC will have the opportunity to ask any quick clarifying questions that can be easily addressed. After Page 13 clarifying questions are answered, the SC will participate in a "walkabout" activity where each SC member will be asked to identify additional questions and concerns. Ms. Gloor provided an overview of Section 5 — Strengthen Infrastructure, Facilities, and Services. Infrastructure includes water systems, roadway networks, mass transit emergency facilities, environmental management facilities, and educational and park facilities. Ms. Gloor used an interactive map of the Hamakua planning area to show where the proposed infrastructure will or could be located. Ms. Gloor answered additional clarifying questions. Break Steering Committee "Walkabout" Exercise Mr. Agres explained the walkabout exercise to the Steering Committee. For each strategy listed in Section 5, Steering Committee members were to indicate on charts which were posted on the walls, which proposed policies they understood, and which they did not. If there were questions, concerns, or additional informational needs, Steering Committee members were to write these on Post -it notes, along with their initials, and place them on the respective policy chart. The public was also invited to participate in a walkabout activity separate from the Steering Committee. Following this exercise, Mr. Agres facilitated a question and answer session based on the questions written on Post -it notes by Steering Committee members and the public. Break for Lunch Ms. Gloor, Mr. Agres and Mr. Whitmore continued to answer clarifying questions that were written on Post -it notes by Steering Committee members and members of the public. Ms. Gomes facilitated a discussion with the Steering Committee to determine which questions, concerns or additional informational should be documented and discussed in detail during Business Item 92 of the meeting. Section 6 Overview Ms. Gloor provided an overview of Section 6 — Build a Sustainable, Local Economy. Most of Section 6 is organized by sectors — local agriculture, health and wellness services, creative, education and research, place -based visitor, local retail and town centers, and green industries. Ms. Gloor explained that there is little Hawaii County can do in terms of promoting economic development, primarily just land use control and infrastructure. Economic development is interwoven throughout the CDP and is largely dependent on collaborative Community and K61cua actions. Section 6.1— Coordinate Regional Economic Development; guides the implementation of regional economic development strategies, including an education, enterprise development, and research network and regional strategies to increase "buying local." Section 6.2 — Strengthening Local Agriculture; guides efforts to strengthen the local agriculture value chain, including agricultural land acquisition, agricultural parks and water systems, the diversification of agriculture -based businesses on agricultural land, and agricultural tourism. Section 6.3 — Expand Health and Wellness Industry; guides the efforts to increase the health and wellness industry. Section 6.4 — Promote the Creative, Education, & Research Sector; guides the development of a regional education, enterprise development, and research network. Page 14 Section 6.5 — Develop a Place -Based Visitor Industry; Guides the development of a regional ho`okipa network — a place -based approach to community tourism. Section 6.6 — Revitalize Local Retail & Hamakua's Town Centers; guides regional strategies to increase "buying local" and revitalizing the Planning Area's commercial centers. Section 6.7 — Encourage Green Industries; guides sustainable, ecologically sensitive approaches to economic development. Section 6.8 — Preserve Informal Economies and Living off the Land; preserves traditional subsistence living, reciprocity arrangements, and opportunities to live off the land. Ms. Gloor answered additional clarifying questions. Steering Committee "Walkabout" Exercise The Steering Committee completed a walkabout exercise for Section 6. Following the completion of the walkabout exercise, Mr. Agres facilitated a question and answer session based on the questions written on Post -it notes by Steering Committee members and the public. Ms. Gomes facilitated a discussion with the Steering Committee to determine which questions, concerns or additional informational from Section 6 should be documented and discussed in detail during Business Item 92 of the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: There was no public comment at this time. MOTION TO CONTINUE: Ms. Mendoza moved to recess the September 26th meeting and continue it at 8: 30am on Saturday, October 10th at Honoka'a High School Cafeteria. Second by Mr. Neff. Motion passed with S votes aye and 0 votes nay. The meeting recessed at 3: 46pm. CONTINUANCE: October 10, 2015 Vice -Chairperson Farrah -Marie Gomes called the Hamakua Community Development Plan (HCDP) Steering Committee to order at 8:45 a.m. at Honoka`a High School Cafeteria. She noted that this was a continuation of the September 26, 2015 meeting and that the committee would be continuing with Business Item 91: Discussion of and Recommendations for the "Preliminary Working Draft" of the Hamakua CDP. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Brad Kurokawa, Farrah -Marie Gomes, Glenn Carvalho, Lorraine Mendoza, Jason Moniz, and Craig Neff. Ka`iulani Pahi`6 arrived at 1:20pm. Members Absent: Ku`ulei Badua, and Scott Enright were absent. Ka`iulani Pahi`6 were absent. Staff LeAna Gloor — Hamakua CDP Project Manager, Planner, Ron Whitmore — Hawai`i County Planner. Keiko Mercado — Hamakua CDP Planning Assistant, and Bob Agres — HACBED. Members of the public: 2 MEETING OVERVIEW: Ms. Gomes (Vice -Chair) provided an overview of the meeting, including an explanation of the purpose and scope of the CDP, the roles of the Steering Committee and the meeting agenda. Ms. Gloor reviewed the timeline and next steps for the Hamakua CDP, and briefly outlined the content that would be covered. Page 15 Ms. Gomes reviewed the Steering Committees Aloha Etiquette and opened the floor to public testimony. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Jim Cain from Waipi`o testified on behalf of himself in regards to the Draft CDP. He began by stating his appreciation for the Steering Committees dedication and all the hard work put in by the entire team. There are many changes occurring in Waipi`o already and a balance needs to be maintained. He named several organizations that would be important to collaborate with, and who would be instrumental in the implementation of the CDP actions. In addition, he provided written testimony with specific comments related to Waipi`o Valley (see page 10). BUSINESS: Continuation of the "Overview of the "Preliminary Working Draft" of the Hamakua CDP": Mr. Agres reiterated the process for the Steering Committees Review of the Preliminary Working Draft and reviewed that the September 26th meeting covered strategies in Sections 5 and 6. Today's meeting will conclude the review of strategies in the remaining sections (3 & 4) and identify questions, concerns and additional informational needs. The next step would be to confirm the Draft CDP is ready for community review, followed by an agreement on the best way to present the Draft CDP to the community for their input and comment. Ms. Gloor reviewed the organization of the CDP binders and reminded the Steering Committee that the points identified for further discussion from this meeting will be added to the list from the September 26th meeting and will be discussed at the next meeting. Steering Committee members had questions on the structure of the document relating to additional links being included and the different versions of the Draft as it changes. Ms. Gloor acknowledged the importance of the questions and provided answers. She also assured the Steering Committee that any questions that may come up would definitely be noted and addressed. Mr. Agres explained that today's meeting would follow the same process as the September 26th meeting: • Overview of the Section • Answer quick clarifying questions • Walkabout exercise • Discuss questions to determine which need to be brought back at the next meeting. Section 3 Overview Ms. Gloor provided an overview of Section 3 — Preferred Land Use & Settlement Patterns. This section uses Land Use Policies to focus future residential development in existing villages, towns, and subdivisions, and seeks to preserve larger -lot productive agricultural lands for agriculture by accommodating rural development close to urban centers. It also guides future lands use permitting to be consistent with CDP objectives and policies. Ms. Gloor reviewed some basic land use terms and reminded the Steering Committee that the two main reasons to control land use is to ensure public health and safety and to create spaces to thrive in, in order to ensure quality of life. She thanked Mr. Neff for bringing forth the idea of "what is good for the land, is good for the people" (`O ka mea kupono `dina ka mea kupono kanaka). This idea should resonate throughout the plan. Page 16 Questions posed by Steering Committee members regarding land use, permitting and zoning were answered by the planning team to ensure understanding. Ms. Gloor continued by providing information on land use policy, including the differences in jurisdiction between the State and the County, an explanation of zoning, and the different types of permitting. She also explained the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map and its various designations. Land Use Guidance is covered in the following way: • The CDP guides land use through the official Land use Policy map for Polices 1, 2, 3, 4; 5, & 11. • The CDP provides guidance for variances and zoning code amendments in Policies 7, 8, & 10. • The CDP guides land use decisions for future industrial areas in Policy 6. Ms. Gloor answered additional clarifying questions. Break Ms. Gloor answered additional clarifying questions. Steering Committee "Walkabout" Exercise Mr. Agres detailed the walkabout exercise for the Steering Committee, reiterating that clarifying questions and questions that require additional information should be written on the Post -it notes available and posted by the respective policies. Community members in attendance were also invited to participate in a walkabout exercise. The Steering Committee completed a walkabout exercise for Section 3. Following the completion of the walkabout exercise, Mr. Agres facilitated a question and answer session based on the questions written on Post -it notes by Steering Committee members and the public. Ms. Gloor answered clarifying questions and compiled a list of questions that require additional information. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: There was no public comment at this time. Section 4 Overview Ms. Gloor provided an overview of Section 4 — Protect and Enhance Natural and Cultural Resources. This section guides the expansion of lands held in public trust, supports landowners establishing conservation and agricultural easements and suing agricultural and forestry land preservation programs, and encourages natural Area Reserves to pursue acquisition priorities. Ms. Gloor identified that the County's primary role over resource protection is regulation — zoning, setbacks etc. Some tools utilized for resource protection are incentives (e.g. tax incentives, conservation easements), acquisition (e.g. The Nature Conservancy), private covenants (e.g. covenants), community based actions and regulations. Ms. Gloor also touched on Conservation Easements and Special Management Areas (SMA). Section 4 overview was covered in two segments because of the amount of content within the section; however, it is important to remember that each of the sections extensively overlap one another. Sections 4.1— 4.6 Section 4.1— Expand the Local System of Preserves — Guides the expansion of lands held in public trust, supports landowners establishing conservation and agricultural easements and using agriculture and forestry land preservation programs, and encourages Natural Area Reserves to pursue acquisition priorities. Page 17 Section 4.2 — Protect Coastal Resources — protects coastal resources with the CDP Land Use Policy Map, shoreline setbacks, the Special Management Area, and encourages the State to strengthen protections and the community voice in land use decisions. Section 4.3 — Protect Agricultural Lands & Open Space — protects agricultural land and open space from non-agricultural development with the CDP Land Use Policy Map, stronger farm dwelling regulations, minimum lot sizes, tax incentive programs, development of transfer of development rights, land bank programs, and State Important Agricultural Land designations. Section 4.4 — Protect Mauka Forests — protects mauka forests from development with the CDP Land Use Policy map. Section 4.5 — Preserve Scenic Areas and Viewsheds — protects open space, areas with natural beauty, and scenic viewsheds with permitting controls and by prioritizing viewshed regulations, scenic overlooks, and scenic routes. Section 4.6 — Protect and Enhance Ecosystems and Watersheds — encourages the collaborative development and implementation of resource management plans, and the enforcement necessary to protect ecosystems. Steering Committee "Walkabout" Exercise The Steering Committee completed a walkabout exercise for Sections 4.1 — 4.6. Following the completion of the walkabout exercise, Mr. Agres facilitated a question and answer session based on the questions written on Post -it notes by Steering Committee members and the public. Ms. Gloor answered clarifying questions and compiled a list of questions that require additional information. Break Before continuing with Section 4, Ms. Gloor referred back to Section 3 to be sure all Steering Committee members are comfortable and familiar with the proposed LUPAG maps. Using the Rational Section in the Draft CDP binder, Steering Committee members were able to compare existing LUPAG mags with the proposed LUPAG maps. Steering Committee members were encouraged to contact Ms. Gloor should they come have any additional questions/comments regarding the LUPAG maps. Ms. Gloor then continued with the overview of Section 4: Sections 4.7 — 4.9 Section 4.7 — Protect and Enhance Cultural Assets — prioritizes the preservation of historic building and roads and the development of historic streetscapes and rural road standards, also guides community -led efforts. Section 4.8 — Establish and Manage Public Access and Trails — directs appropriate public access to the shoreline and mauka forests, guides community -led access management, and prioritizes a County public access program. Section 4.9 — Preserving Sacred Places: Waipi`o Valley and Mauna Kea — Identifies Waipi`o Valley and Mauna Kea as sacred places needing special attention. Steering Committee "Walkabout" Exercise The Steering Committee completed a walkabout exercise for Sections 4.7 — 4.9. Following the completion of the walkabout exercise, Ms. Gloor, Mr. Agres and Mr. Whitmore discussed questions written on Post -it notes by Steering Committee members and the public. Ms. Gloor answered clarifying questions and compiled a list of questions that require additional information. This additional information will be brought back to the Steering Committee for discussion during the next continued meeting. Page 18 FUTURE MEETINGS: Ms. Gloor facilitated a conversation with the Steering Committee to determine a specific date, time, and place to continue the meeting. The continued meeting would be a facilitated discussion organized around the concerns, suggestions for improvement, areas for discussion, and additional information previously identified during Business Item 91. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: There was no public comment at this time. ANNOUNCEMENTS: None MOTION TO CONTINUE: Ms. Mendoza moved to recess the meeting and continue it to 10: 00am on Saturday, November]4th at Laupahoehoe Library Humanities Room. Second by Ms. Pahi'o. Motion passed with 6 votes aye and 0 votes nay. The meeting recessed at 4: 51pm. NOTE: The September 26th meeting was originally continued to October 10th and later continued to November 14th. Due to lack of quorum, the November 14' continued meeting was cancelled. With the cancellation on November 14th, the original September 26th meeting has officially closed and a new agenda (reflecting the unfinished business of the September 26th agenda) has been generated for a November 21' 2015 meeting. Page 19 Written Testimony from Jim Cain — October 10, 2015 Pg. 22 1.6.2 Challenges Limited capture of high volume visitor traffic (this is not necessarily bad) Pg. 26 Objective 13 Promote appropriate? Community accepted rural tourism that welcomes guests for an alternative visitor experience but does not have a negative impact on the host community as it pertains to privacy, public safety and appropriate public infrastructure. Pg. 50 Land Use Policy Policy 14 *An assessment of existing or proposed improvements to access roads as it pertains to public safety and carrying capacity of access roads. Pg. 61 Policy 41 7. Collaborate with the Waipi`o Valley community in implementing the Waipi`o valley Stream Management Plan Pg. 66 Policy 48 "shall establish responsible public access.... Such public access shall include host community in planning, implementation and maintenance activities and must be managed for public safety, carrying capacity and the promoting of traditional values. Pg. 68 Policy 52 ...and create a resource protection overlay and regulations that will protect Waipi`o's natural resources, preserve Waipi`o's storied past and perpetuate its agricultural traditions and unique rural lifestyle. • Collaborate with the Waipi`o Valley community to develop a long range management plan for Waipi`o that addresses public access, carrying capacity, resource management and potential funding sources for on-going maintenance of streams and roads. Pg. 68 Policy 52 *Support community organizations such as the Waipi`o Community Circle, The Waipi`o Taro Farmers Assoc., and Ha Ola O Waipi`o Valley in developing and implementing a community-based watershed plan based on the Waipi`o Valley streams and roads. Pg. 68 Policy 55 Such a route must be designated as to minimize impacts related to Waipi`o Valley as it pertains to view plane, light and noise pollution, and must be evaluated for impacts to the carrying capacity of Waipi`o Access Road. Pg. 68 Policy 57 Enforce existing zoning and SMA laws pertaining to conducting visitor industry activities on agriculturally zoned laws. Pg. 69 Policy 58 Waipi`o Valley Heritage Center Pg. 69 Policy 59 Heritage Center Pg. 73 Policy 60 Waipi`o Valley Heritage Center Pg. 80 Policy 85 Include Waipi`o Valley on the County Flood Map Pg. 88 Policy 105 • Establish a county level Department of Agriculture to implement the County of Hawaii Ag Development Plan Pg. 91 Policy 111 • Will not have a negative impact on the host rural community relating to privacy, public safety and rural lifestyle. Pg. 91 Policy 112 With appropriate zoning? Page 110