HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-9-21Hamakua SC Decision-Making Tool POST DeliberationsHAMAKUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS DOCUMENT
Decision -Making Tool for Considering Revisions to the
Ha-ma-kua CDP Land Use Policy Map
Alternatives Relative to Objectives, Factors, Community Input, and the Steering Committee Deliberations from Sept. 10, 2016
Content Revised
9/21/2016
This is a revised version of the decision-making matrix tool discussed at the September 10, 2016 Steering Committee Meeting. The document content has
been revised to reflect new information presented, Steering Committee deliberations, and preliminary decisions.
Decision -Making Tool for Considering Revisions to the Hamakua CDP Land Use Policy Map:
Alternatives Relative to Objectives, Factors, Community Input, and the Steering Committee Deliberations from Sept. 10, 2016
Focus on O`okala
• Option 1: No change to the Draft CDP
• Option 2: Designate parcel TMK 3-9-001:023 (13.9 acres) Low Density Urban
• Preliminary SC Decision: Option 2 plus the reduction of LDU on parcel 3-9-001:034 to protect viewsheds from Highway 191
1
Objective 1: Protect
Factor 1:
Current GP LUPAG:
Draft CDP eliminates Urban
Some residents expressed
Include parcel 3-9-001:023 as Low Density
Option 2: In order to accommodate
restore,o
Industrial on coastal parcel 3-9-001:005.
Expansion Area and
desire to maintain Urban
Urban to accommodate flexibility in
flexibility for growth options near the
watershedCoastal ecosystems,
o Entire coastal area between O'okala town and
Industrial designations on
Expansion Area to
growth in O`okala while still ensuring
center of O`okala and not on coastal
Development.
shoreline is Urban Expansion. This is the only area
coastal parcels.
develop these coastal
growth is not on shoreline parcels.
parcels, the Steering Committee selected
:
, spaces,
open
designated Urban Expansion in the Planning Area.
properties for residential
Option 2 for parcel 3-9-001:023.
mauka forests to makai
and commercial uses.
In order to protect viewshed and open
shorelines, while
• Urban Expansion Area (UEA) is flexible enough to allow
Some residents opposed
space visible from HWY 19, the Steering
assuring responsible
for heavy industrial and high density urban (HDU), neither
the change on coastal
Committee designated as Agriculture the
public access ...
of which are consistent with Objective 1 and Factor 1.
parcels from Industrial to
corner of the parcel nearest HWY 19
Agriculture.
(TMK 3 -9-001:034), which is owned by
• Most of the larger
COH and is currently designated LUPAG
community input was
LDU. See Footnote 1.
supportive of minimizing
new coastal
Objective Protect d
Factor
• Current GP LUPAG includes UEA and Low Density Urban
Draft CDP removes the Urban
Factor 2 should be carefully considered.
Option 2: The Steering Committee did
restore
(LDU) on coastal agricultural lands
Expansion Area from the
developments and
Parcel 3-9-001:023 is currently zoned Ag-
not consider the designation of parcel 3 -
agricultural lands.
Encroachmentcoastal
agriculture lands and
encroachment on
20 but does not appear to be in active
9-001:023 as LDU to be in conflict with
. .
• im
shrinks the LDU area from
agricultural land.
agricultural use.
Factor 2 because that parcel is not
Agricultural
agriculture areas between
considered productive/core agricultural
Lands.O`okala
and Highway 19, and
land. It is adjacent to other urban parcels
away from the adjacent camp
and is considered an appropriate area for
neighborhood of Nui Village
O`okala to grow due to its central
location.
1 Notes: Current zoning determines permitted uses for parcels. In addition, CDP land use designations do not automatically change the General Plan's LUPAG maps. If there is a direct conflict between a Community Development Plan and the General Plan, the General Plan shall be
controlling. (See the Hawai'i County General Plan, Ch. 15)
CKo]IIIaI1r:1iLVJNIame]f►Awill [:7
Factor 3: Alig-MEF
In the Current GP LUPAG:
Draft CDP more closely aligns
• Factor 3 should be carefully considered.
Factors 3 & 4:
With SLU
o The LDU is consistent with the SLU Urban district,
LDU with current SLU
Option 2 would extend LDU into the SLU
Option 2: The addition of parcel 3 -9 -
Boundary.
except the (small) parcel 3-9-005:010 is LDU in LUPAG
districts and County
Agriculture district.
001:023 does extend the LDU into the
but split between SLU Urban and Agriculture districts.
residential and commercial
SLU Agriculture district and onto
Factor 4: Alig�--q
o Coastal parcels 3-9-001:005 and 3-9-001:004 are SLU
zoning.
• Factor 4 should be carefully considered.
agriculturally zoned land, but the Steering
With County
Urban ( zoned Industrial)
Exception is coastal parcel 3-
The parcel is zoned Agriculture.
Committee did not see this as significant
9-001:005 (9+ acres), which is
considering the location and size of the
o There are split designations between LDU/ Agriculture
SLU Urban & zoned Industrial
• Factor 5 should be considered carefully:
parcel. See Factor 2 above.
Factor 5:
in line with existing split SLU district designations near
but designated Agriculture in
the current zoned urban area is adequate
the Highway (TMKs 3-9-001:034, 3-9-001:042, and 3-9-
the Draft CDP. Aligning this
to handle projected growth. Adding this
Factor 5:
Projected
001:034).
coastal parcel with SLU
parcel to the LDU would provide additional
Option 2: In order to accommodate
Population
o LDU expands beyond current County residential and
Urban and Industrial zoning
flexibility for future growth.
flexibility for growth near the center of
Growth
commercial zoning.
would not be consistent with
O'okala, the Steering Committee chose to
Existing infill potential in the SLU and zoned urban areas
Factor 1— Minimize New
designate parcel 3-9-001:023 LDU.
can accommodate growth projections through 2035.
Coastal Development.
Facil, 6; • . •
County water system service 7 units per existing lot; units
[Correction: waiting on
• Municipal water system improvements are
n/a
Water
available for subdivision, 'ohana, and zone changes.
DWS confirmation that a
necessary for development.
County water system
• Roadway network is adequate for urban
Factor 7:
Current roadway is adequate in urban areas.
exists but improvements
area.
Roadway
are necessary for further
• Wastewater is individual. Without a
Network
development.]
municipal/community wastewater system,
• No municipal wastewater system; all residences served by
future development pattern will likely be
Factor 8:
Wastewater
individual wastewater systems.
at a minimum of 10,000 sq. foot lots.
Factor 10:
. Current GP LUPAG Industrial straddles four parcels: two
Draft CDP shrinks the
Note that parcels 3-9-001:005 and 3 -9 -
Industrial Areas
coastal parcels (3-9-001:005 / 3-9-001:024), and two
Industrial designation to
001:004 maintain their industrial zoning.
adjacent inland parcels (3-9-001:004 and 3-9-001:023).
parcel 3-9-001:004 to avoid
See Footnote 1.
• The former mill site in the area is located on 3-9-001:004.
heavy industrial on the
I i
coastline parcels.
Decision -Making Tool for Considering Revisions to the Hamakua CDP Land Use Policy Map:
Alternatives Relative to Objectives, Factors, Community Input, and the Steering Committee Deliberations from Sept. 10, 2016
Focus on Laupahoehoe / Papa`aloa
■ Option 1: No change to the Draft CDP
■ Option 2:
➢ ii: Designate parcel 3-5-004:003 Open along coastline and Agriculture (11+acres)
➢ iv: Designate the following parcels mauka of Laupahoehoe school as LDU:
3-5-004:0057, 3-5-004:0056, 3-5-004:0055, 3-5-004:0054
➢ vi: Align Open shoreline along coast as shown in current GP
■ Preliminary SC Decision: Option 1 to maintain Draft Open designations; Option 2 iv for expanding LDIJ
3
Objective
Most coastal areas here
Draft CDP designations do
Most community input supportive
• ii. Including parcel 3-5-004: 003 in agriculture will still
Option 1 ii: The Steering Committee chose to
Protect, restore, and
already developed.
not increase coastal
of minimizing new coastal
ensure growth is not on shoreline parcel; underlying SLU
maintain the Open designation for coastal parcel
watershedenhance
In near -coastal Kapehu
development options or
development & encroachment on
Conservation further protects it from future urban
3-5-004:003 in order to clearly articulate the
ecosystems,
Camp, LDU is confined to
density along the coast
agricultural land.
development.
desire to protect this coastal parcel from future
sweepingexisting
SLU Urban areas.
beyond the already existing
Some community input requested
• iv. n/a
development and to be consistent with the
open spaces,romSLU
Urban or County zoning
that coastal parcel 3-5-004:003
• vi. Aligning the Open designation with the current GP is
underlying State Land Use Conservation district.
ma u ka forests to
entitlements.
reflect Open and Agriculture
consistent with community objectives.
See footnote.
makai shorelines,
11
designations to align with current
Option 1 vi: The Steering Committee chose to
while assurin _
agricultural uses (Draft CDP shows
maintain Draft CDP designations for the Open
responsible ,
parcel entirely in Open, &the
shoreline areas because they provide more
underlying SLU is Conservation
precise and comprehensive guidance for
district).
minimizing new coastal development.
• Community expressed concern that
1 Open coastal area appeared to
in Draft CDP maps.
Objective rotectshrink
Current GP LUPAG expands
Draft CDP shrinks LDU areas
ii.. Designating coastal parcel 3-5-004:03 as split between
Option 2 iv. The Steering Committee chose to
and restore viabi —J
Minimize
LDU beyond urban areas
from encroaching mauka of
' Some residents directly mauka of
Open and Agriculture acknowledges this as agricultural
designate parcels 3-5-004:057, 3-5-004:056, 3-5-
%•
agricultural lands.
.
onto agricultural lands.
urban areas onto
school area expressed desire for
land.
004:055 & 3-5-004:054 LDU to accommodate
[into Core
agricultural lands.
flexibility of town to grow mauka
future growth. It did not consider the
slightly.
iv. Parcels 3-5-004:057, 3-5-004:056, 3-5-004:055, 3-5-
development of these small (currently
004:054 are long/narrow lots all under 5 acres each and do
agricultural) parcels a significant encroachment
not reflect a dramatic encroachment onto productive
onto productive agricultural lands.
agricultural lands.
• vi. n/a
2 Notes: Current zoning determines permitted uses for parcels. In addition, CDP land use designations do not automatically change the General Plan's LUPAG maps. If there is a direct conflict between a Community Development Plan and the General Plan, the General Plan shall be
controlling. (See the Hawai'i County General Plan, Ch. 15)
CKo]IIIaI1r:1iLVJNIame]f►Awill rel
Community Strategic
Draft CDP Consideration
Draft CDP Designations
New Information from
Alternatives to the Draft CDP & Factor
Summary of Steering Committee
Objectives Factors
of Strategic Factors
Community Input
Considerations (Option 2)
Deliberations & Preliminary Decisions
relative to the Current
..
Obj . ,
Factors 3 and 4: Current GP
Draft CDP more closely
Factor 3.
Factors 3 & 4:
future settlement
With SLU
LUPAG LDU expands beyond
aligns LDU with current SLU
o ii. Would not be consistent with the underlying SLU
Option 1 ii: The Steering Committee chose to
patterns ... limiting
Boundary.
current SLU urban and
Urban district and County
Conservation district.
maintain Draft CDP Open designation for coastal
rural sprawl.
residential and commercial
residential and commercial
o iv. Would extend LDU into the SLU Agriculture district
parcel 3-5-004:003 in order for it to be consistent
FactorObjective
zoning.
zoning.
slightly.
with the underlying State Land Use Conservation
9.
the
With
CountyEncourage
Factor 5: Existing infill
Draft CDP allows for limited
o vi. Would closer align to SLU Conservation district.
district;
& diversity
Zoning.increase
potential in the SLU and
flexibility for town to
• Factor 4.
Option 2 iv: Parcels 3-5-004:057, 3-5-004:056, 3-
of employment and
zoned urban areas can
expand beyond SLU urban
o ii. Would align with its zoning of Ag -20.
5-004:055, & 3-5-004:054 are in the SLU
living ..
&-
-actoraccommodate
growth
area.
o iv. Would extend LDU onto County zoned Agriculture areas
Agricultural district and are agriculturally zoned;
liccommodate
projections through 2035.
for these small parcels.
however, the Steering Committee did not
•
o vi. n/a
consider the development of these small parcels
• • •
Factor 5
a significant encroachment onto productive
•
o iv. Provides future flexibility in growth; however, currently
agricultural lands. See Factor 2 above.
zoned urban area is adequate to handle projected growth.
Factor 5:
• Not applicable for Parcel 3-5-004:003
• Option 2 iv: While currently zoned lands are
adequate to handle projected growth, the
Steering Committee thought that including
parcels 3-5-004:057, 3-5-004:056, 3-5-004:055, &
3-5-004:054 in the LDU provides further growth
options near the commercial core, school, &
services.
DevelopObjective 6:
County water system service
Draft CDP designations for
• Municipal water is available.
n/a
and improve critical
• otable Water,
7 units per existing lot; units
LDU are supported by water
• Roadway network is adequate for urban area.
community
oadway
available for subdivision,
and roadway systems but
• Wastewater is individual. Without a municipal/community
•
`ohana, and zone changes.
depend on individual
wastewater system, future development pattern will likely
including utilities
tewater
• Current roadway is
wastewater systems.
be at a minimum of 10,000 sq. foot lots.
adequate in urban areas.
• No municipal wastewater
system for
Laupahoehoe/Papa`aloa; all
residences served by
individual wastewater
systems.
• •
Current GP LUPAG MDU
Draft CDP removes MDU
n/a
•
straddles gulches and is not
area from coastal Papa`aloa
enhance a diverse,
appropriate)aligned
with commercial
(Factor 1); aligns/shrinks
localcenters;
likely due to
MDU to appropriate
economy.mapping
discrepancy.
commercial area of
IndustrialCurrent
GP LUPAG shows no
Laupahoehoe.
Industrial designations.
Draft CDP designates 3
Industrial zoned coastal
parcels as LDU / Open. This
accurately reflects current
land uses. (One parcel is
COH; adjacent to park )
CK•l0i 11110 tiik]IkVJ161a411WAW,91[:i
5
Decision -Making Tool for Considering Revisions to the Hamakua CDP Land Use Policy Map:
Alternatives Relative to Objectives, Factors, Community Input, and the Steering Committee Deliberations from Sept. 10, 2016
Focus on Papa`ikou Point
■ Option 1: No change to the Draft CDP
■ Preliminary SC Decision: No Change to the Draft CID p.3
Objective 1: Protect,
Factor 1:
Current GP LUPAG designates coastal areas LDU
Draft CDP removes LDU in coastal areas
• Most community input
n/a
Option 1: Due primarily to Factor 1 and
restore, and enhance
Minimize New
and Industrial.
currently zoned Ag; shrinks MDU away
supportive of minimizing new
its related objective of preserving
watershed ecosystems,•
1
astal
from area makai of Hwy 19; removes
coastal development in this area.
viewshed resources (see Community Obj.
sweeping views, and
evelopmentJ.
Industrial designations from coastal
• Most community input
1), and in response to community input,
open spaces, from mauka
parcels.
supportive of minimizing
the Steering Committee chose to retain
forests to makai
development encroachment on
the Draft CDP land use designations for
agricultural land.
Papa'ikou Point.
• Some residents expressed desire
Current GP LUPAG expands urban designations
Draft CDP shrinks LDU areas to avoid
Objective 2: Protect andw
Factor 2:
to develop residential &
n/a
Option 1: The Steering Committee
restore viable agricultural
Minimize
beyond existing urban areas onto agricultural
encroaching onto coastal agricultural
commercial centers in this area.
discussed the viability of traditional
Encroachment
lands along the coast and mauka of Papa'ikou
areas and agricultural areas extensively
agriculture for this area and due to the
•
town.
mauka of urban areas.
surrounding urban interface, it was noted
Lands.that
it is not necessarily an ideal
agricultural area but that the agriculture
designation helps retains open space and
protect the scenic viewshed.
LItinj. ,tivejirectTutur.
• Current GP LUPAG LDU expands beyond current
• Draft CDP more closely aligns LDU with
n/a
Factors 3 & 4:
settlement patterns ...
With SLIJ
County residential and commercial zoning.
current SLU districts and County
Option 1: Draft CDP more closely aligns
concentrating new
Boundary.
residential and commercial zoning.
LDU with current SLU Agricultural district
development•
Papa'ikou Point area is in the SLU Agriculture
and County agricultural zoning.
Factor 4: Ali
• Draft CDP allows for limited flexibility for
walkable, mixed-use
town centers limiting
With County
district
town to expand beyond SLU urban area
Factor 5:
...
rural sprawl.
Zoning.
• Papa'ikou Point area is zoned Ag -20
on mauka side of Hwy 19.
Option 1: Existing infill potential in the
SLU and zoned urban areas can
Objective 9. Encourage
increase & diversity
Factorthe
Existing infill potential in the SLU and zoned
accommodate growth projections.
living options
Accommodate
urban areas can accommodate growth
Additionally, the Draft CDP allows for
...
Pop
projections through 2035.
limited flexibility for town to expand
Growthbeyond
SLU urban area on the mauka
at'
111h
side of Hwy 19.
3 Notes: Current zoning determines permitted uses for parcels. In addition, CDP land use designations do not automatically change the General Plan's LUPAG maps. If there is a direct conflict between a Community Development Plan and the General Plan, the General Plan shall be
controlling. (See the Hawai'i County General Plan, Ch. 15)
Community
Strategic
Draft D• Consideration of Strategic
Draft CDP Designations
Objectives
Factors
Factors relative to the Current GP LUPAG
Community Input
the Draft CDP
Deliberations & Preliminary
& Factor
Decisions
Considerations
(Option
Objective anr•
County water system service 7 units per existing
Draft CDP designations for LDU are
n/a
improve critical
Potable Water,
lot; units available for subdivision, `ohana, but
supported by water/wastewater and
community
Roadway
f
not zone changes.
roadway systems.
infrastructure, including
utilities ...
Network, &
Wastewater
• Current roadway is adequate in urban areas.
• Municipal wastewater system has room for
expansion.
•
Current GP LUPAG shows town has two separate
Factor 9:
n/a
•
MDU areas — one area straddles Highway 19,
o Draft CDP reduces the MDU area from
sustainable,• •
and the other is not aligned well with
the coastal area and confines it to
economy.
commercial centers; likely due to mapping
existing commercial area mauka of
Factordiscrepancy.
Hwy 19 (related to Factor 1).
IndustrialCurrent
GP LUPAG shows Industrial designations
o Draft CDP eliminates the second MDU
straddling several parcels along the coastline,
area located near the Gym/Community
including a residential neighborhood. Note:
Center area.
there is no Industrial zoning in this area; the
lk
industrial LUPAG designation is a legacy from a
Factor 10: Draft CDP replaces Industrial
former mill site.
designations on coastal parcels with Ag.
This more accurately reflects current land
uses and the underlying zoning.
Decision -Making Tool for Considering Revisions to the Hamakua CDP Land Use Policy Map:
Alternatives Relative to Objectives, Factors, Community Input, and the Steering Committee Deliberations from Sept. 10, 2016
Focus on Hakalau Point
• Option 1: Maintain the designations for the coastal parcels of Hakalau Point as shown in Draft CDP
• Option 2: Revise the Open shoreline area along the coast to be consistent with the Open area as shown in the current General Plan. Revise the
Industrial designations for parcels 2-9-020:079 and 2-9-020:081 (as shown on the Draft CDP) to be consistent with the current General Plan.
• Preliminary SC Decision: Option 3: Revise the Open shoreline area along the coast to be consistent with the Open area as shown in the current General
Plan, but'clean up' the Open/LDU boundary along private roadway. Designate all of parcels 2-9-020:079 and 2-9-020:081 Open .4
7
Objective 1: Protect,
'Factor 1: Mini
Current GP LUPAG designates coastal
Draft CDP replaces coastal
Most community input
Option 2 maintains Open
Option 3: The Steering Committee considered the Open areas
restore, and enhance
New Coastal
areas LDU and Industrial.
Industrial designations with LDU
supportive of minimizing new
designation in larger area of
as shown in Option 2 to be more aligned with Factor 1. The
watershed ecosystems,
1]
• •
(consistent with SLU Urban
coastal development in this
shoreline parcels.
Steering Committee also chose to straighten the wavering
sweeping views, and
district boundaries).
area.
boundary between Open and LDU areas that crossed the
open spaces,romSome
residents expressed
private road at the south part of the Point.
mauka forests to makai
concern that Open coastal
Option 3: In light of community input, the Steering
area appears to shrink in
Committee also considered any further development on
Draft CDP maps.
parcels 2-9-020:079 and 2-9-020:081 to be inconsistent with
• Most community input
Factor 1, so it chose to designate both parcels Open.
supportive of minimizing
Objective
• Current GP LUPAG LDU extends
Draft CDP shrinks LDU areas to
n/a
n/a
restore viable
• . •
around Wailea Town slightly onto
avoid encroaching onto
encroachment on agricultural
agricultural lands.
Core Agricultural
surrounding agricultural lands.
agricultural areas surrounding
land.
. .
•
• NOTE: Hakalau Point parcels are not
urban Wailea town.
Some residents expressed
desire to develop residential
core agricultural land, they are not
& commercial centers on
County zoned Agriculture, and are not
Hakalau Point.
in the State Land Use Agricultural
district.
Obj. 5: Direct future
Factor 3: Hakalau Point is entirely in
Draft CDP more closely aligns
Factor 3: Hakalau Point is entirely
Factor 3:
settlement patterns ...
With SLU
the SLU Urban district.
LDU with current SLU districts.
in the SLU Urban district, so
Option 3: Despite being out of alignment with the SLU Urban
concentrating new
1oundary.
Option 2 is aligned with SLU
district for these Hakalau Point parcels, the Steering
development ng,boundaries.
Committee considered urban development there
walkable ... limiting rura'
inappropriate due to the following issues: Factor 1- minimize
new coastal development, the history and heritage of the
area (including the Japanese cemetery on the site), and the
Objective 9. Encourage
the increase & diversity
employmentof
living options
potential loss of viewshed/open areas. See footnote.
4 Notes: Current zoning determines permitted uses for parcels. CDP land use designations do not automatically change the General Plan's LUPAG maps. If there is a direct conflict between a Community Development Plan and the General Plan, the General Plan shall be controlling. (See
the Hawai'i County General Plan, Ch. 15)
Community
Strategic Factors
Draft CDP Consideration of
Draft CDP Designations
New Information from
Alternatives to the Draft CDP
Summary of Steering Committee Deliberations &
Objectives
DecisionsCurrent
GP ..
(Option
actorFactor
4: Hakalau Point is a mix of
Draft CDP more closely aligns
Factor 4: Option 2 is consistent
Factor 4:
CountyWith
Residential and Industrial zoning.
LDU with County residential and
with current zoning but not as
Option 3: Despite being out of alignment with the parcels'
•
commercial zoning.
expansive as current zoning
industrial zoning, the Steering Committee considered the
• Factor 5: Existing infill potential in the
(currently both parcels are
legacy industrial zoning there inappropriate, especially
actor 5:
SLU and zoned urban areas can
Draft CDP allows for limited
entirely zoned Industrial and
because this site is adjacent to Hakalau Bay, an
ccommodate
accommodate growth projections
flexibility for town to expand
Option 2 limits the Industrial to
environmentally sensitive area. Moreover, the Steering
• �
through 2035.
beyond SLU urban area on
the area of existing warehouses);
Committee affirmed that it is unnecessary to maintain
• • •
mauka side of Hwy 19.
surrounding parcels are zoned RS-
industrial zoning to ensure agricultural processing capacity in
7.5.
the community due to the fact that processing of agricultural
■ Factor 5: Existing infill potential in
products is allowed on agricultural lands.
4.
the SLU urban and zoned urban
areas can accommodate growth
projections through 2035.
Objective Develop
County water system service 1 unit
Draft CDP designations for LDU
[Correction: DWS determination
Factors 6, 7, 8: Option 2 is
Option 3: An open space area has a less intensive need for
and improve critica
-
I 45a
per existing lot; not necessarily
/Industrial are supported by
from 2010 states that water is
similar to Draft CDP in that
water & wastewater. The existing roadway network
community
available for subdivision, 'ohana, or
roadway systems but not
available for subject parcels;
Industrial is connected to
connects to this area.
zone changes.
necessarily by
number of water units available
roadway network, is possibly
utilities ...
• Current roadway is adequate in urban
water/wastewater.
and system improvements
supported by water system but
areas.
required depends on uses (e.g.,
private wastewater systems
■ There is no wastewater service for
industrial vs. residential, etc.)]
would need to be developed.
area. All residences are served by
individual wastewater systems.
• •
■ Current GP LU PAG shows town has
Draft CDP removes MDU area
Factor 10: Option 2 is consistent
Factor 9:
•
two separate MDU areas — one area
from coastal area and the MDU
with the Draft CDP.
Option 3: The Steering Committee affirmed that the three
diverse, sustainable,
appropriate)straddles
Highway 19 and the other is
near existing commercial area
parcels near the Post Office retain their Commercial zoning
localnot
aligned well with commercial
mauka of Hwy 19 (Factors 1 and
to allow for revitalization of commercial endeavors in this
Factorcenters;
likely due to mapping
9).
non -coastal area of Hakalau. See footnote.
Industrialdiscrepancy.
Draft CDP reduces Industrial
■ Current GP LUPAG shows Industrial
designations on the coastal
Factor 10:
designations straddling several
parcels by designating the
Option 3: In light of the other Draft CDP policies allowing for
parcels along the coastline, including
shoreline areas of the parcels as
flexibility in identifying future industrial sites, the Steering
a residential neighborhood beyond
LDU. This more accurately
Committee affirmed that industrial areas should not be sited
current Industrial zoning.
reflects its underlying SLU urban
on coastal parcels. See Footnote.
district and the neighboring
area.
[K•l'I140Inilk] ILVJ161a64111111►li11111111•11101