Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 15, 2016 Final SC MinutesWilliam P. Kenoi Mayor County of Hawaii PLANNING DEPARTMENT Duane Kanuha Director Joaquin Galniao-Kunkle Deputy Director HAMAKUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone (808) 961-8288 • Fax (808) 961-8742 Tuesday, March 15, M6 Meeting Minutes K-A10reZe7ilk] 17aCii Chairperson Brad Kurokawa called the Hamakua Community Development Plan (HCDP) Steering Committee to order at 5:07p.m. at the Laupahoehoe Library Humanities Room. 11MOINK02119 Members Present: Brad Kurokawa, Glenn Carvalho, Lorraine Mendoza, Jason Moniz, Craig Neff, and Ka'iulani Pahi'o. Members Absent: Farrah -Marie Gomes and Scott Enright. Staff: LeAna Gloor- Hamakua CDP Plan Manager, Planner, Keiko Mercado- Hamakua CDP Planning Assistant, Bob Agres and Brent Kakesako - HACBED. Members of the public: 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS: Ms. Gloor announced that Ku'ulei has "retired" from the Steering Committee as she needs to spend time resting and recuperating. While Ku'ulei will no longer be an active Steering Committee member, she will always be a dedicated community member and will continue to support the work of the Hamakua CDP. At this stage we will continue moving forward without selecting a new Steering Committee member. MEETING OVERVIEW: Mr. Kurokawa (Chairperson) provided a brief overview of the meeting, a general review of the agenda and public testimony protocols. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: There was no public comment at this time. Hawai `i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Page I 1 F-AaaWeI%IIto] af•IIto] 916 i Ms. Mendoza moved to approve the September 26, 2015 draft minutes os submitted. Second by Mr. Neff. Motion passed with 5 votes aye and 0 votes nay. (Ms. Pohi'o was not yet present). Ms. Mendoza moved to approve the November 21, 2015 draft minutes os submitted. Second by Mr. Neff. Mr. Carvalho requested that the record reflect his disapproval of the testimonial procedure at the September 26th meeting. Further discussion by the Steering Committee led to Mr. Carvalho's recognition of the minutes as amended per the November 21s' meeting. Motion passed with 6 votes aye and 0 votes nay. BUSINESS: 1. Community Review of the Draft CDP: Mr. Agres outlined the community review process to ensure all Steering Committee members were prepared for the SpeakOuts and Focus Meetings. He covered the overall purpose of the community review, desired outcomes, target audiences, and assumptions. He also covered the different elements of the review, including: SpeakOuts, Focused Discussions, and CDP Roadshows. Mr. Carvalho expressed concern regarding the timeline of events and suggested the Roadshows happen prior to the SpeakOuts. He also requested the Focused Discussions be held from 6pm — 8pm. Ms. Gloor explained the importance of the open public SpeakOuts taking place prior to the more "private/invitational" Roadshows. Discussion continued regarding meeting times, topics, and different events. (See Item #2, page 3, for the vote taken relating to Focused Discussion meeting times). Steering Committee members were given a sample SpeakOut board and a related handout for their review. Mr. Agres explained the framework of the SpeakOut and provided a general overview of the process. 2. Steering Committee Roles During and After Community Review of the Draft CDP: Mr. Agres explained that the Steering Committees role during Community Review would be to explain, by being available to answer questions, orient people, connect them with planning team members, and represent the CDP/SC at community meetings; and to listen, by being accessible, organizing "small group" talk story meetings, and participating in SpeakOuts. The Steering Committee was familiarized with the four levels of listening, pretend, selective, attentive, and empathic listening. They were also presented with two different skits to demonstrate appropriate and inappropriate responses to possibly controversial comments, and were then given the chance to share their "elevator speech" with the committee. Mr. Agres emphasized the importance of empathic listening in order to be able to accurately capture public comments at the SpeakOuts. He also noted that every effort must be made to record all Page 12 public comments on chart paper, or post -it notes, or comment forms. The raw data collected will be instrumental in moving forward. Ms. Gloor covered the outreach strategies for both the Planning Department and for the Steering Committee. It was also noted that the Sunshine Law must be adhered to during this process. Sign-up sheets for the SpeakOuts and Focused Meetings were sent around to the Steering Committee. Bulletin board posters were distributed to the Steering Committee for them to post throughout the planning area. Mr. Carvalho moved to adjust the time of the focused meetings to be from 6pm-8pm. Second by Mr. Moniz. Motion passed with 6 votes aye and 0 votes nay. Ms. Gloor explained that once the community review process is complete, the raw data will be sorted by topic and strategy and used to identify options for revisions that the Steering Committee will deliberate on. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: There was no public comment at this time. EVALUATION OF THE March 15, 2016 MEETING: Steering Committee members identified the following positive aspects of the meeting: • Good food from a local business • Enjoyed the role playing • Appreciate Mr. Agres and his facilitation skills • Good preparation by the Planning Team • Appreciation for the Steering Committees commitment and excitement about what will be heard from the community Steering Committee members also identified the following aspects of the meeting that weren't quite as they expected: • Too many mosquitos FUTURE MEETINGS: Meetings dates and times will be determined after the community review phase is complete. ADJOURNMENT: Ms. Pohi'o moved to adjourn the meeting. Second by Mr. Moniz. Motion passed with 6 votes aye and 0 votes nay. The meeting adjourned of 7:12pm. Page 13