Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-03-30 KCDP Minutes Final1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee County of Hawaii Final Minutes Meeting Date: March 30, 2016 Call to Order 2:00 p.m. Place: Kona Planning Conference Room. Bldg. E, 2nd Floor West Hawai'i Civic Center 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 12 Roll Call: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1. Members Present: George (Keoki) Schattauer Jr., Kari Kimura, Barbara DeFranco, Hiram Rivera, Greg Ogin and Douglas Payne 2. Planning Department: Terry Dunlap 3. Public in attendance: Jeff Zimpfer, Janice Palma -Glenne, Karen Eoff, Riley Smith, Peter Young, Michael Shibata, Nancy Carr Smith, Ken Melrose, Michael Riehm, Richard Wheeler, Jim McClean, Ross Wilson, Maile David, Bobby Command, Bill Moore and Chris Oakes. 20 21 The meeting was called to order by the chair, Hiram Rivera, and introductions of AC members followed. 22 23 STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS ON AGENDA 24 1. Janice Palma -Glenne — comments on CDP force of law and term limits for Action Committee 25 members. 26 2. Ken Melrose — comments on disappointment of the Director's opinion on addressing whether 27 the ordinance adopting the KCDP also amended all of the other code provisions that the 28 KCDP stated it amended. Discussed the 8 year struggle to unlock the process for 29 projects to proceed. Problems with connectivity. 30 ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 31 1. Minutes were unanimously approved for January 27, 2016. 32 2. No addendum or supplemental agenda 33 3. No communications other than draft minutes. 34 35 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 36 1. Legal opinion on the KCDP 37 Since the Planning Director was ill and unable to attend the meeting, a question was asked of 38 Terry as to whether he could answer questions about the letter on the legal opinion of the KCDP. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Terry responded that he is unable to address the subject matter as it is a legal interpretation and is outside of his expertise. The following comments were offered: The letter was discussed with the Action Committee and attending members of the public. Items discussed were: • Will there only be one CDP island wide? • The CDP was adopted without existing ordinances properly amended. Pg. 3, paragraph 6, it is pointed out that the existing County Ordinances prevail. • Goals and objectives are the guiding principles for the KCDP and that we should move forward with this in mind. • How will the Planning Department and the AC work together? • Concurrency should focus on building specific roads. The subcommittee worked on the concurrency plan which was enacted by plan and made recommendations to the Planning Director to follow the County Code and utilize the level of service in determining concurrency. • The KCDP was enacted by plan with guiding principles as to where and how development would grow. How will Planning review items such as roads and their connectivity for concurrency plus how will Planning filter through the process enacting capital improvements projects. • The AC will be struggling in its new role. • Some were more comfortable for the AC to operate now that the legal position has been addressed. Where do we go from here? Our objectives will be Smart Growth in the correct location and to establish walkable communities. • A commented that the AC reviews are a grey area and the Planning Commission exists to review projects. • Revisions for Chapters 23 & 25 would affect all projects island wide and would not work. The hope is that the new General Plan will allow KCDP to still exist. • We should focus on principles and intent and not zoning changes. • Minimum lot sizes should be reduced. Previously, the Director mentioned that the General Plan would handle that. • The KCDP will become a guide which will become more productive. • TODs can be implemented in the General Plan. • It was also mentioned that TODs cannot happen and that land planning should use existing zones with consideration of adjacent lands. • We need to look to the future in three ways: 2 73 a. Connectivity 74 b. Guidance with disagreement for differences between developers and 75 the Planning Department 76 c. Guidance for goal interpretations and policy reinforcement 77 This will allow the KCDP to maintain its own autonomy. 78 • Open space needs to be kept in the forefront; 79 • Is the 1976 CDP vision of what, where and how are still there and the document is 80 still valid. Does it still fit the policy of the CDP? 81 • There is no financing to achieve concurrency as outlined in the KCDP. 82 • In the Missler's case, the question is still under appeal with the judge dealing with 83 the KCDP as a valid law. Should this opinion be brought before the County 84 Council? If we are unable to implement some situations of the KCDP, can the 85 County Council be informed? 86 • If we are not in compliance, then we have a quagmire. 87 • Recommended that we need an Action Statement: Change the Ordinance? This can 88 happen through the new General Plan. 89 • This is not all bad. This will provide direction to be utilized in the General Plan. 90 • Concerns about open space; 91 • We need a consultant for a redevelopment plan for the town of Kailua-Kona. 92 • The Open Space request will be on the final 2016-2017 budget. 93 Doug Payne made a motion to call for a special meeting to meet in April to further discuss 94 County Planning Department's legal opinion letter dated February 24, 2016 and to invite the 95 Director Duane Kanuha and Corporation Counsel Mr. Bill Brilhante to attend. An additional 96 request was also included to invite April Surprenant, Planning Program Manager for Long - 97 Range Planning Division to meet with the KCDP in May, 2016. Second by Greg Ogin with 98 unanimous approval. 99 2. Discussion followed for Hiram's draft letter to the Director in response to the Request for Legal 100 Opinion letter dated February 24, 2016. 101 A motion was made by Doug Payne and seconded by Greg Ogin to send the draft letter to Director 102 Kanuha for his review before the scheduled future meeting. 103 3. Business of Committee 104 Term limits were discussed including the following expiration dates for service: 105 • Greg Ogin's term expires in March 2016, and he cannot be reappointed. Greg has 106 agreed to continue serving until a replacement has been found or until he can no 107 longer serve. 3 108 • Curtis Tyler III's term expires in March 2016; however, since he filled a previous 109 term and served less than one year, he is eligible for re -nomination and with 110 approval by the County Counsel, he can serve for a full 4 year term. 111 • Keoki Schattauer's term expires in June 2016 and he cannot be reappointed. 112 4. Subcommittee Reports 113 • No report from Open Space 114 • Greg read the draft Ad-hoc subcommittee report on implementing the KCDP a 115 copy of the report.is attached. Greg Ogin moved and Doug Payne seconded to 116 send a copy of this revised report to the director for his review and for discussion 117 at the next scheduled meeting. 118 • Doug Payne reported on the Statewide Traffic Improvement Plan (STIP) and that 119 widening of Kuakini Highway is scheduled. Discussion continued on Ali'i 120 Parkway and the importance of concurrency. Ken Melrose discussed that in the 121 past that the only roads being built were by developers and that the KCDP was 122 correct in addressing concurrency requirements with the County. Barbara 123 DeFranco asked that these subjects be placed on a future agenda. Doug Payne also 124 noted that Alii Parkway and Kealakehe parkway have been removed from the 125 STIP. 126 5. Motion to adjourn 127 128 11