My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-02-06 Wil Okabe's testimony re SB 410
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Office of the Mayor Documents
>
2016-2020
>
Correspondence
>
2017
>
02-2017
>
2017-02-06 Wil Okabe's testimony re SB 410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2017 9:36:55 AM
Creation date
2/6/2017 9:34:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Harry Kim <br />Mayor <br />Wil Okabe <br />Managing Director <br />Barbara J. Kossow <br />Deputy Managing Director <br />Offire of fljr4aUor <br />25 Aupum Street, Suite 2603 • Hila, Hawaii 96720 • (808) 961.8211 • Fax (808) 961.6553 <br />KONA 74-5044 Aae Keohokalole Hwy, Bldg. C • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 <br />(808) 323-4444 . Fax (808) 323-4440 <br />February 6, 2017 <br />Senator Gilbert S.C. Keith-Agaran, Chair <br />Judiciary and Labor <br />Hawai'i State Capitol <br />Honolulu, HI 9681 <br />Dear Chair Keith-Agaran and Members: <br />RE: SB 410 <br />Thank you for this opportunity to comment on SB 410. <br />SB 410 says its purpose is to "clarify" the allowable scope of collective bargaining <br />negotiations regarding the rights and obligations of a public employer, and also "clarify" <br />prohibited practices for parties to a public employment collective bargaining agreement. <br />However, as we read the bill, its provisions would take away rights of the employer, and <br />that is not acceptable. <br />As we read SB 410, it would provide a union another subject area to grieve, by alleging <br />that an action by the employer to implement affects the terms and conditions of <br />employment. So, the amendment does not clarify, it muddies the current bright line of <br />understanding between employer rights and employee rights. <br />It would remove from HRS 89- 9 "permissive subjects of bargaining which currently (1) <br />are not mandatory, (2) are permissive and (3) are limited to 'procedures and criteria.' <br />HRS 89-9 properly recognizes "permissive subjects of bargaining"; there is no duty to <br />bargain, and a party cannot be compelled to bargain on permissive subjects. <br />Therefore, the County of Hawaii must oppose passage of SB 410. It goes beyond mere <br />clarification, and gets into substantive changes in the rights of the parties. <br />Res ctfully submitted, <br />1///A� <br />Wil Dkabe <br />Managing Director <br />County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.