My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-02-28 Letter to Jill Tokuda re SB 410 SD1 - Relating to Collective Bargaining
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Office of the Mayor Documents
>
2016-2020
>
Correspondence
>
2017
>
02-2017
>
2017-02-28 Letter to Jill Tokuda re SB 410 SD1 - Relating to Collective Bargaining
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 11:13:12 AM
Creation date
2/28/2017 4:04:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Harry Kim <br />Mayor <br />COWIN Of Pitt'Mi i <br />Wil Okabe <br />Managing Director <br />Barbara J. Kossaw <br />Deputy Managing Director <br />®ffrn of the Agin <br />25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 • Hilo, Hamar] 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553 <br />KONA 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy., Bldg. C • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 <br />(808)323-4444 • Fax (808) 323-4440 <br />February 28, 2017 <br />Senator Jill Tokuda <br />Ways and Means <br />Hawai'i State Capitol <br />Honolulu, HI 96813 <br />Dear Chair Tokuda and Members: <br />RE: SB 410 SD 1 <br />Relating to Collective Bargaining <br />Thank you for this opportunity to comment on SB 410, SD1. <br />SB 410, SD1 says its purpose is to "clarify" the allowable scope of collective <br />bargaining negotiations regarding the rights and obligations of a public employer, and <br />also "clarify" prohibited practices for parties to a public employment collective bargaining <br />agreement. However, as we read the bill, its provisions would take away rights of the <br />employer, and that is not acceptable. <br />As we read SB 410, SD1 it would provide a union another subject area to grieve, <br />by alleging that an action by the employer to implement affects the terms and conditions <br />of employment. So, the amendment does not clarify, it muddies the current bright line <br />of understanding between employer rights and employee rights. <br />It would remove from HRS 89- 9 "permissive subjects of bargaining" which <br />currently (1) are not mandatory, (2) are permissive and (3) are limited to 'procedures <br />and criteria.' HRS 89-9 properly recognizes "permissive subjects of bargaining"; there is <br />no duty to bargain, and a party cannot be compelled to bargain on permissive subjects. <br />County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.