HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-03-16 Letter to Glenn Wakai and Karl Rhoads RE HB 1310 HD 1 AND HB 1479 hd 2Harry Kim
Mayor
Wil Okabe
Managing Director
Barbara J. Kossow
Deputy Managing Director
(Offirr off4cAnVor
25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553
KONA: 74-5044 Are Keohokalole Hwy., Bldg. C • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740
(808) 3234444 9 Fax (808) 3234440
March 16, 2017
Senator Glenn Wakai, Chair
Committee on Economic Development, Tourism and Technology
Hawai'i State Capitol
Honolulu, HI 96813
Senator Karl Rhoads, Chair
Committee on Water and Land
Hawai'i State Capitol
Honolulu, HI 96813
Dear Chairs Wakai and Rhoads, and Members:
RE: HB 1310, HD 1 and HB 1479, HD 2
Relating to the Waiakea Peninsula Redevelopment District
and Relating to the Hilo Community Economic District
Thank you for this opportunity to testify in support of the intent and purpose of HB
1310, HD1 and H131479, HD2.
We appreciate the attention that the Legislature has placed on the disposition of
State lands within and proximate to the Banyan Drive peninsula and the Kanoelehua
Industrial Area. Great opportunities exist to partner with private sector businesses to
carry out important economic revitalization efforts and optimize the use of these lands
for the benefit of the entire community. Our County's ongoing efforts with the Banyan
Drive Hawai'i Redevelopment Agency (BDHRA) reflect that such benefits are not simply
economic, but social and cultural as well. It is with this comprehensive approach in
mind that we support the bills introduced during this legislative session that seek to
explore opportunities regarding the use and management of State-owned lands within
the core economic section of Hilo. We especially appreciate the work of Senator
Kahele, who authored SB1292 and has worked so hard on this issue.
County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Wakai/Rhoads
March 16, 2017
Page 2
In terms of most of the technical details in these bills, I would appreciate if you would
consider the testimony of my Planning Department, which is being submitted
separately. But I do want to offer the following comments:
1. The lessees in the Kanoelehua Industrial Area are caught in an economic bind, unable to
improve their properties because their leases are close to expiration. We therefore believe that
the broader scope of HB 1479 (and S131292) is preferable to the more narrow scope of HB 1310.
If one of these bills becomes law, the Hilo Community Economic District (HCED) will be the only
redevelopment district outside of the City and County of Honolulu. For this reason, we ask that
consideration be given to providing that the District have a voting majority of members from the
Hilo community. I think this could be accomplished if the County Planning Director was a voting
member, the cultural specialist was a cultural practitioner from the Hilo community, and the
Director of Transportation was dropped or made ex officio, non-voting (I don't think
transportation will be as significant an issue as it has been on Oahu).
The idea of having a local cultural specialist is important, separate and apart from the issue of
majority control. Current statutory language provides for just one cultural specialist for all
redevelopment districts. We hope you will change that to provide for a separate cultural
specialist for the Hilo redevelopment district, even if one specialist for all the Oahu districts has
been satisfactory.
4. We cannot afford to jeopardize or divert the real property tax revenue that comes from the
affected parcels and currently goes into the County general fund (we estimate $3M).
There are two concerns here.
First, SB 1292, SD2 says that
§206E -D Hilo community economic revolving fund. (a) There is established in the state
treasury the Hilo community economic revolving fund, into which shall be deposited:
(1) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including section 206E-16, all revenue, income,
and receipts of the authority for the district;
Second, it seems, at least in theory, that the Authority could issue leases that
provide for the lessee to be exempt from property taxes for the term of the lease.
We do not think that the Legislature intends to affect real property taxes, so we
ask for language that makes it crystal clear that real property taxes are not part of
County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Wakai/Rhoads
March 16, 2017
Page 3
"revenues, income, and receipts...", that leases cannot affect property tax obligations,
and that all property taxes will continue to flow to the County general fund.
5. The bills say their purpose is to deal with State-owned land, so perhaps language should be
inserted that says that this statute applies only to land within the district boundaries that is
State-owned. We have not determined how much non -State owned land might be affected.
bills.
Again, we thank you for these important initiatives, and we strongly support these
Resp ctfully submitted,
Harry Ki
Mayor
County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.