The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2015-05-17 General Plan Comprehensive Review Presentation FinalCounty of Hawaii COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTION COMMITTEE Update: General Plan Comprehensive Review Michael Michael Yee Planning Director Hawaii County Planning Department Hilo Office Vie C 0 mr-s", C • Meet and Greet • Overview of the General Plan Comprehensive Review process • Implications for community planning • Next steps INTRODUCTIONS Bethany I Bethany Morrison Long Range Planner Hawaii County Planning Department Hilo Office Ron Ron Whitmore Deputy Director Hawaii County Department of Research & Development Hilo Office MAPPING KONA's FUTURE Kona Community Development Plan r: Volume 1 September 2008 FINAL Adopted September 25, 2008, by Ordinance 08-131 • Recent Kona CDP AC focus: • Roads &Connectivity (CIP STIP) • Open Space Plan/Network • Kailua Village • FIRM • What does CDP implementation look like? Overview where we've geew y where we l -re y where we'! e fteaded • Scenario Planning Track: Land Use and Capital Improvement Maps • Strategies & Policies Track: General Plan Elements • Community Planning Track: GP, CDPs, other plans, and their Implementation where we've reeve Where we Are Where we're l-/eaaea ABOUT THE GENERAL PLAN Scope • Island -wide plans, rules, and policies • Provides a framework for region and local plans • Looks out 25 years Contents • Goals • Policies • Implementation actions Example Implications • Future rezoning Public improvements like roads and water and sewer systems Program priorities .77FgT , Sk where we've reeve Where we Are Where we're l-/eaaea GENERAL PLAN REVIEW PROCESS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - . Community Development PIS=_=_ . _ _ ndat III Public Input -_-_-_ ______________ __________ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _ _-------- Trend Scenario Alternate Sce rios Preferre Scenario Implementation Strategies Technical Workshops Models and Indicators _ _ _ `-----------------__ _ _ _ _ _ _----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ----------------------------_-_-_-_- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ E---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- onfirm Goals 2005 _ August 2016 I! WIN, I F W U here we've Peep Where we, re M� where we're 1-�e,?aea 2016 2017 Fall -Winter 2017 Early 2018IL Gather Initial Community Input Research & Analysis -Community Workshops in Kona & Hilo -Technical Meetings in Hilo & Kona Strategy Development & Refinement - Intergovernmental Coordination - CDP Committees & Other Stakeholders Finalize Recommendations Adoption Process Slide 9 WR3 Dates need to be updatd. Mgmt has to decide how to speak to the fact that there's no way we can hit Feb 2018 deadlie. Whitmore, Ron, 5/2/201- Overview where we've geekL w4 where we, -Ye w4 where we're ffeaded • Scenario Planning Track: Land Use and Capital Improvement Maps Where we-ve geew wmi1 we w �-e W4 SCENARIO PLANNING TRENDS & FORECASTS E; 9 o/ growth by 2040 2015: 195,000 2040: 296,000 By 2040, the fraction of homes in underserved growth areas will increase from 16% to 229/o _.1fe've !-feaple�' Slowest growth Fastest rowth 11 where we're Feew m&4� where we,4Ye SCENARIO PLANNING TODAY F" External Forces Choices, Strategies where we're f-teaaea Trend Scenarios FUTURE Measures where we're Feew mm� Where we Akre mm� Where we're Heaaea INDICATOR COMPOSITES Composite scores for each category Conservation 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Existing Trend CDP IPA Hazard Avoidance 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Existing Trend CDP IPA (worst l, best) Building Blocks 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Existing Trend CDP IPA Mixed Use Centers 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Existing Trend ■ CDP IPA where we're Feew mml� Where we Akre mm� Where we're Heaaea SCENARIOS INCORPORATE CDP STRATEGIES • Concentrate growth in regional and neighborhood centers • Preserve open space and views Examples: Kona South Kohala Puna Overview where we've geekL im=4 where we, -Ye w4 where we're ffeaded • Strategies & Policies Track: General Plan Elements MB6]here we've geew Where we Are Where we're HeRaea Each Topic: STRATEGIES chic •Contextual Info POLICIES 'Statutory Framework • Key Drivers, Issues &Opportunities • Data Sources, Indicators, and Metrics • Funding &Budget Considerations 16 Slide 16 M136 need to align list of topics, or mention that because of their interconnections the topics fall into these themes... Morrison, Bethany, 4/28/2017 M B here We "Ve p�eew y Where we,4Ye mm� Where we're �eGTGi�eGi� RELATIONSHIP TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANS (CDPs) General Plan County -wide High -Level Policies and Direction Framework Containing CDPS egional Level xtensive Community Input ranslates General Plan into ocalized Actions vlutually dependent 17 Slide 17 M137 the integration bubbles need switched around, cdp first. Morrison, Bethany, 4/28/2017 where we're Feew 0&.1 Where we Akre mm� Where we're HeR,�2'ea GP -CDP COMPARISON • By topic • By type of strategy •Initial Takeaways • 99% alignment • Tremendous opportunity for synthesis and distillation • Much of what's in CDPs can be "lifted up" into the General Plan where we 11le Feew y Navigation Where we Akre M* where we're 1-�eaaea T X Search document P-1 HEADINGS PAGES RESULTS D 1 Natural Resources D 2 Historic and Cultural Resources D 3 Public Access & Trails D 4 Hazards D 5 Scenic Resources D 6 Land Use — Protected Areas, open Space, and Preser... A 7 Land Use Settlement Patterns 7.1 Goals + Aspirational Policies 72 Policy Controls (limit the range of decisions tha... 7.3 County Actions (programs, projects, capital imp._. P 7.4 Non -County Actions (programs, projects, capita._. D 8 Land Use — Growth Centers D 9 Housing D 10 Land Use — Industrial Areas D 11 Land Use — Resort Areas D 12 Capital Improvements — General D 13 Transportation D 14 Utilities —General D 15 Water D 16 Wastewater D 17 Telecom D 18 Energy D 19 Facilities - General D 20 Solid Waste D 21 Fire Reshape Future Development Trends Puna CDP 3.1.2.a. Implement tools for re -shaping the pattern of future development to prevent further sprawl, such as land pooling. 3.1.2. k. Where possible, reduce density and buildout within the district by various means including Selective rezoning. Establish a Growth Pattern Kona CDP Objective W-1: Overall Growth Pattern. To identify areas where higher intensity growth areas should occur and areas where the rural character and open space along the shoreline should be preserved. Objective LU -3: Rural Area Growth IVlanage rnent. To preserve the rural character of the existing rural towns, the agricultural lifestyle, and the open landscape. Objective PUB -6: Quality of Life. To faster a sense of community and health through the public realm such as gathering places, parks, pedestrian networks, and open spaces. Limit Coastal Development to Coastal -Dependent Uses Ka'u CDP Policy 26 - Fncourage those developments that are not coastal dependent to locate in inland areas. (HRS 205A-2(c)(3(D)} where we're Peeve m&4� where we,4Ye INTEGRATION AND REFINEMENT where we're 1-tea,�21ea Individual GP Topic Elements MB19,eve We"Ve P�eew where we Are mm� where we -re f-teaded Land Use & Infrastructure Maps ON C'OTTN,M- OF HAWAII GENERAL PLAN Research StrE Slide 21 M138 Remove the GIS layers from this. Morrison, Bethany, 4/28/2017 MB19 and last animation Morrison, Bethany, 5/5/2017 Overview where we've geekL im=4 where we, -Ye w -m4 where we're ffeaded • Community Planning Track: GP, CDPs, other plans, and their Implementation where we've reeve M� Where we Are EM� Where we're l-/eaaea EVOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING *General Plan: 1971, 1989, 2005 • Limited, ad hoc community planning • Limited community engagement • 2005 General Plan • CDPs were a response to a call for a meaningful public role in planning where we're Feew r�i Where we Are mm� where we're F-teaaea CDP OUTPUTS • CDPs Addressed Weaknesses of the General Plan • Many CDPs have overlapping goals and objectives • Many CDP recommendations have island -wide applicability • Strategy type labels varied but their meaning was consistent • Goals • Policy controls (limit the range of decisions that can be made) • County actions (programs, projects, capital improvements, code changes) • Non -county actions which include community actions • Clarification of strategy types makes it easier to identify the community-based actions and collaboration opportunities where M=� Where we Are y Where we're f-tegded CDPs: MEANINGFUL PUBLIC ROLE IN PLANNING GP Chapter 15 2005 General Plan- establishes the Community Development Plan (CDP) program Hawaii County Code Ch. 16 CDPs and the Action Committees are codified Opportunities • Reshape Community Planning • Strengthen implementation M B21rere we've �eew � where we � re y where we -re f-teaded CDP COMMITTEE MEETINGS *Regular Mtg. May 17th *Special Mtg. June 2111 *Additional meetings as needed • Scenario Planning Track: Land Use and Capital Improvement Maps • Next: Scenario review and refin em en t • Strategies & Policies Track: General Plan Elements • Next: Review and refinement of draft General Plan elements • Community Planning Track: GP, CDPs, other plans, and their Implementation • Next: Clarify County Community Planning, with a focus on implementation Ire Slide 26 MB21 remove first screen animantion Morrison, Bethany, 5/5/2017 where mm� Where we Are sm� Where we're f-teaa'ea' A CTION COMMITTEE ROLES • Lead: Be a proactive, community-based steward of CDP implementation • Liaise: Build partnerships with governmental and community-based organizations to implement the CDP • Advocate: Guide and advocate to advance CDP implementation • Make Budget Recommendations: CIP and operating where we're Feew mm� where we Are COLLABORATION where we -re f-teaded A State & Federal • DLNR • NPS • DOH Watersheds ORMP Community GP County • HOAs Action • R&D • Property owners Committees • Planning • Businesses • DPW • Non -profits • Parks & Rec. where mm� Where we Are y Where we're f-teaded OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY-BASED LEADERSHIP • Watershed management • Open space and scenic resources • Public access and trails • Cultural & historic resource management • Town/village planning • Community infrastructure • Emergency Preparedness and Response • Healthcare Services • Affordable housing • Economic development where mm� Where we Are y Where we're f-teaded COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP Lead and Liaise • Informal, flexible, adaptable • Decentralized, distributed problem -solving • Autonomous but coordinated hierarchy ■. + ■ 1P! t.. r ` i ■ r • ■ . ■ - r n etwork 30 + + r ■. + ■ 1P! t.. r ` i ■ r • ■ . ■ - r n etwork 30 where no* Where we Are m6i� Where we're f-te gded COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP • Large "Kona Urban Area" landowners: • Queen Lili'uokalani Trust IN KONA • Kamehameha Schools • D H H L, State of Hawaii (all De pts) • Communitynodes. • Lanihau Properties LLC • Public and Private Schools/Councils • Forest City (FHT Kamakana LLC) • Churches, religious -spiritual organizations • Kaloko Residential Park LLC (TSA) • Sports leagues, clubs • Palamanui Global Holdings LLC • KVBID, K -K Chamber of Commerce • Economic sector: • Resource management sector: • Kailua Village Bus. Impr. District (BID) • National Park Service • Kona-Kohala Chamber of Commerce • State DLNR - OCCL ,DOCARE, • Farm/ag industry groups DOBOR DFW • Univ — Ag Ext. Service (CTAHR) •Other "allies" and "anchor" institutions: • West Hawaii Forum • University Center — West Hawaii • PA.T H. where mm� Where we Are sm� Where we're f-teaded DEPARTMENT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT • Advances sustainable community and economic development • Collects and develops data to guide program development, policy-making, and decision-making • Resource Center with staff in both Hilo and Kona who focus on research and enterprise development • Has Economic Development Specialists who focus on: agriculture, energy, industry development, tourism, and creative media/film • Coordinates awareness of grant programs • Provides $100,000s each year in community and economic development grants County of Hawaii GENERAL PLAN COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW .w-, General Plan Website: cohplanningdept.com/general-plan/ Sta u to date! Facebook- facebook.com/cohgeneral-plan 33 Y p _. Email: general plan@hawaiicountygov °: ° ° .��