HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-01-29 Letter to Richard H.K. Onishi re HB 1665 TATHarry Kim
Mayor
Couttfg
Wil Okabe
Managing Director
Barbara J. Kossow
Deputy Managing Director
ffirr of till Alavor
25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553
KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy., Bldg 0 • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740
(808) 323-4444 • Fax (808) 323-4440
January 29, 2018
Representative Richard H.K. Onishi, Chair
House Committee on Tourism
Hawaii State Capitol, Room 429
Honolulu, HI 96813
Dear Chair Onishi and Committee Members:
Re: HB 1665 Relating to TAT
Hearing Date: 01/30/18 — 9:00 am; House Conference Room 429
Thank you for scheduling HB 1665 for hearing, and giving us an opportunity to
make our case for restoration of the percentage share of the TAT to the counties.
My understanding is that the TAT was originally established to assist the
counties, but the Legislature has always had the prerogative to determine how it will be
apportioned. Given Hawaii County's limited resources (and seemingly unlimited
needs), we are fortunate that the Legislature has never wavered in allowing the counties
to share in the TAT, and we thank you for that.
The TAT is a very important source of revenue to the County of Hawaii (and the
other counties), and we rely on it to balance our budget and maintain services for our
citizens and visitors. The current allocation has dealt a punishing blow to us, and
therefore to our taxpayers. You and I represent and serve the same people.
Decimating the budgets of the counties is not beneficial; it simply forces the counties to
drastically reduce services or increase other taxes for our shared constituents.
The State of Hawaii has always received the major portion of the TAT revenues,
but I think it is correct to say that when the TAT was first established, it was envisioned
as a way to help the counties deal with the effects of tourism, including such costs as
police, fire, parks, and other infrastructure impacted by tourists. When the Great
Recession hit, the share of TAT for the counties was capped, but that was only
supposed to be temporary, until the economy recovered. We are well past the recession
now.
Without the share that the counties would have received prior to the cap, we
have been forced to raise property taxes and are now considering adding to the GET,
both of which worsen the pressures on our population, many of whom are barely
managing a paycheck -to -paycheck financial existence. Property tax increases hurt a
County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employm
January 29, 2018
Page 2
major portion of our residents, affecting renters and homeowners alike. Property taxes,
after all, are not simply absorbed by a landlord or business; they are passed on, in
whole or in part, to the tenant or customer. The GET, a regressive tax, is paid by all.
HB 1665 would amend the amount of transient accommodations tax revenues
allocated to the counties from a specified sum to a percentage of the revenues
collected. If the counties' share of the TAT were restored, Hawaii County would not
need to impose increases on property, fuel or vehicle weight taxes.
If the Legislature locked in those numbers now, there also would be the added
benefit that you would not have to spend so much time dealing with complaining
counties, year after year. In addition, we all could plan our future budgets with greater
certainty.
My priority this session is to seek an increase in the TAT, and that goal is shared
by the Council of Mayors and the Hawaii State Association of Counties (i.e., the County
Councils). Since the State and the counties serve the same constituents, it is important
that we continue to work as partners in meeting the needs of our communities. As
demand for services is ever increasing (and so is the cost of those services), it is
equally important that revenue be appropriately shared so that the demands can be met
to the best of our combined abilities.
The chart below reflects how small a portion of the TAT comes to Hawaii
County, and how the percentage has shrunk over the years.
Please help us help our fellow citizens by restoring this vital component of the
County budget to its original percentage.
Re
pectfutly submitted,
Harry Ki
Mayor, County of Hawaii
County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
January 29, 2018
Page 3
TAT — Tota i vc. HawaV County Portion
glomma CI („)