Laserfiche WebLink
Harry Kim <br />Alayor <br />Wil Okabe <br />Managing Director <br />Barbara J. Kossow <br />Deputy Managing Director <br />Offirr of ffir <br />25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553 <br />KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy., Bldg C • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 <br />(808) 323-4444 • Fax (808) 323-4440 <br />March 19, 2018 <br />Senator Glenn Wakai, Chair <br />Committee on Economic Development, Toursand Technology <br />Hawail State Capitol, Room 414 <br />Honolulu, HI 96813 <br />Senator Clarence K. Nishihara, Chair <br />Committee on Public Safety, Intergovem ental, and Mitary Affairs <br />Hawai`i State Capitol, Room 414 <br />Honolulu, HI 96813 <br />Dear Chair Wakai and Nishihara, and Committee Members: <br />Re: HB 2605, HD 2, Proposed SD 1, Relating to Transient Accommodations <br />Hearing Date: 03-21-18 — 1:45 pm; Conference Room 414 <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment on proposed amendments to HB 2605, HD 2. 1 mostly <br />will limit my remarks to Section 14 of the proposed SD 1. <br />Section 14 would allocate an unspecified percentage of GET and TAT tax revenues to the <br />counties, contingent upon establishment of a process to provide verification of compliance by an operator <br />or plan manager with county land use laws. I cannot tell from the language whether this allocation is <br />meant to replace or to supplement the TAT funds that the counties presently receive. Only if these <br />payments would be in addition to current allocations, could Hawail County support it. <br />A second point is that, if the State is looking for increased enforcement of vacation rentals, what <br />is the financial impact of that increased enforcement? It is more inspectors, and more appeals, and <br />contested cases on enforcement of vacation rentals, and the problem will persist indefinitely. Therefore <br />the payments to the counties should be every year. I think, but am not certain, that Section 14 is <br />providing annual allocations to the counties. I would ask that the language be made clearer, to avoid any <br />ambiguity. <br />Then third, the question remaining would be the amount. What is the right amount for the State <br />to invest in fixing this problem? As formerly provided, a $1 million allocation per county seemed viable. <br />Anything less would be inadequate to solve the problem with vacation rental enforcement. <br />In closing, I would note that previous versions of this bill gave a lot more teeth to enforce on third <br />party platforms, i.e., Airbnb and VRBO. Gutting that language will make it harder for counties to enforce <br />illegal vacation rentals, so if the State is looking for meaningful enforcement, please consider restoring <br />the stricter language. <br />ectfully sub <br />Harry Kim <br />Mayor, County of Hawaii <br />County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. <br />ed, <br />