HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-11-21 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
KAILUA VILLAGE DESIGN COMMISSION
COUNTY OF HAWAI‘I
MINUTES
Meeting Date: November 21, 2017
Time: 5:15 p.m.
Place: West Hawai‘i Civic Center
nd
Planning Department Conference Room – Building E, 2 Floor
74-5044 Ane Keohokālole Highway
Kailua-Kona, Hawai‘i, 96740
CALL TO ORDER
Commissioners Present: Shaun Roth, Zon Sullenberger, Mark Van Pernis, Ann Kern and
Jasmine Crusat
Absent and Excused: Peter Dahlberg, Michaela Ikeuchi, John Hetherington and Bryant
Ching
Planning Department: Bennett Mark (Planning Program Manager), Deanne Bugado
(Planner) and Terry Dunlap (Planner)
County of Hawai‘i: Leinani Wessel (Legislative Assistant to Councilman Dru Kanuha)
Applicants/Representatives: Linda Schatz, Matt Nakamoto, Stacy Armstrong, Lester Ng,
Randall Monaghan, Colby Durnin and Thomas Reiter
Public: Cameron Miculka
A quorum was present, Vice Chairman Roth called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. and the
commissioners introduced themselves.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the Meeting of November 5, 2017
Vice Chairman Roth asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the meeting of
November 5, 2017, no corrections were offered, and the minutes were approved as circulated.
STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS
There was no one from the public who wished to testify on any items on the agenda at this time.
NEW BUSINESS
The applicant is proposing a new commercial center, the Niumalu Market Center, located
between Lanihau Center and Henry Street, makai of Queen Ka‘ahumanu Highway,
consisting of 185,650 gross leasable area within 14 buildings.
The anchor tenant and six (6) surrounding buildings are all one story in height with some
heights closer to two stories. These seven (7) buildings are all with flat roofs with no
surrounding mansard roofing or other feature to hide the flat roofs. The remaining seven
1
(7) buildings include two (2) two-story structures with the balance as one-story structures.
All of these seven (7) buildings include mansard roofing around all sides. These structures
are primarily offices with one location for a series of gasoline pumps. The entire site
includes 758 parking spaces. The mauka portion of the site is approximately 20-25 feet
lower than Queen Ka‘ahumanu Highway and as the site extends makai, it eventually drops
in elevation below the existing elevation of Alahou Street. The site is accessible from Henry
Street (current inactive mauka traffic signal) and from the road that currently extends
beyond Alahou Street to Lanihau Center. Landscaping Plan indicates significant planting
around and within the proposed center.
Applicant: Sentinel Development
Landowner: PRII Westwood Lanihau Expansion LLC
TMK: (3) 7-5-004: 007
Location: Street Address has not been assigned
The Commission took up this item at 5:20 p.m.
Mr. Dunlap displayed some site photographs, and gave a PowerPoint presentation of the
applicant’s submittal.
The team that presented the project consisted of: Mr. Colby Durnin, CEO of Sentinel
Development, provided an overall concept of the development, stated that the development was
geared for the pedestrian and let it slip out that the corner store would be Safeway, Lester Ng,
project architect, Architects Hawaii LTD, presented the drawings and discussed the concepts of
the design and Randall Monaghan, Monaghan Landscape Architects, presented the landscaping
plan in detail to the Commissioners.
Commissioner Van Pernis requested clarification for the rock walls being planned for the
development since the location, types of rock walls and heights were not indicated on the
drawings and part of the presentation indicated that the rock walls were to reflect the kuaiwi of
the Kona Field System. Mr. Ng confirmed that there would be rock walls both retaining and
decorative but that they were still in the design stage since not all of the land study reports have
been completed. Randall Monaghan, Monaghan Landscape Architects, also confirmed that the
rock wall system for the develop would reflect the kuaiwi of the Kona Field System the
placement of necessary rock walls for this development along with some additional walls with
decorative or practical use. Commissioner Van Pernis stated that the Commission needed the
specifics of the rock walls in the submitted plans so the Commission can evaluate the proposed
locations and the visual impacts of the rock walls to the community.
Commissioner Sullenberger also articulated concerns about the retaining rock walls as well. He
also noted the importance of the Commission having fully detailed plans before they can
recommend approval on any project. He also noted that the articulation on the wall is bland and
the flat roofs on the large structures are a problem as the flat roofs are inconsistent with Kailua-
Kona Master Plan. Commissioner Sullenberger said that the developer should consider Mansard
roofing around the building perimeter.
2
Commissioner Roth stated that the goals for architectural designs and public spaces, listed in the
written presentation are appropriate, however, these goals are not carried out in the design. The
project is mostly inward facing and does not take into consideration the goal of connecting to the
residents of Kailua-Kona. The design does not meet the spirit of the “Kona Way of Life”. The
project does not seem like a village since the scale in out of proportion in that the entrances are
too large and not of human scale. Also, the two (2) story buildings do not indicate any roof
overhang and the smaller buildings are out of scale with their large roofs.
At this time Commissioner Roth read a letter from Commissioner John Hetherington with
comments concerning this submittal into record. Commissioner Hetherington’s greatest concern
was the flat roofs on the largest buildings with no visible roofing such as mansards around the
perimeter of the flat roofing. This is not consistent with the Kailua-Kona Master Plan from
1994. Commissioner Van Pernis moved to accept the letter into record and Commissioner
Sullenberger seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous by the Commission. .A copy of
Commissioner Hetherington’s letter is attached to these minutes.
Commissioner Crusat commented that there were no plans/designs for the proposed lighting for
the project and also expressed concern of how the proposed plans are geared to the pedestrian.
Commissioner Sullenberger also asked for clarification on the status of the project and
questioned the location and space or square footage of the gathering tower as a place to have
functions – he also expressed concern over the lack of plans/design elements for back of the
buildings that face roadways/walkways/pedestrians. He also expressed that he would like to see
more articulation of the plans towards being a village center. Commissioner Roth also
commented of this lack of integration of these plans with the rest of the village – a specific point
made was that the project let the letter and function of the requirements but not the spirit.
Mr. Ng, architect, indicated that the trellis was to help break up the large scale of the buildings,
but are not continuous along the walkway. Commissioner Roth said this is also a problem as the
scale of the large building continues to dominate the pedestrian walkway where the trellis is
missing
Linda Schatz commented that they are trying to balance the design and function with budgetary
restraints.
Commissioner Kern said that the design criteria stated in the drawings shows good intentions,
however, the design does not show execution of these criteria. Commissioner Kern further stated
that she sees the research that was made into the Kona District/Area but that the plans need to
reflect this better.
Commissioner Roth also noted that the spaces as designed are not effective for public use. Also
the bus stop is not safe since it is proposed adjacent to the large gasoline filling facility location.
Commissioner Van Pernis also expressed concern over the location of the bus stop and the gas
station.
3
Commissioner Van Pernis moved to defer for the applicant to submit a more detailed proposal
which addressed all comments and concerns discussed and the commission would consider
forthwith the resubmittal.
Commissioner Crusat seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous by the Commission.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
Schedules for next year’s meeting dates for meetings of the KVDC were handed out to the
Commissioners by Terry Dunlap.
The Commissioners requested that discussion concerning the possible update of the Kailua-Kona
Master Plan, 1994, be discussed at the next meeting and that the relationship of how this master
plan will be coordinated with the Kona Community Development Plan. Terry Dunlap, planner,
offered to request staff from the Department’s Long Range Division to attend the next meeting,
if possible, to respond to these questions. Also a request that an outline be created to identify
what the CDP does and what the Kona Master Plan does to encourage discussion. The
discussion may include the formation of a subcommittee to address/follow-up on discussion
items.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Next meeting is scheduled for December 5, 2017.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Vice Chairman Roth adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Terry Dunlap, Planner
A T T E S T
Shaun Roth, Vice Chairman,
Kailua Village Design Commission
4