HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMM. 003 Amendments to Rules - Procedure for Proposing Charter Amendments
EDMUND HAITSUKA
Chairman
DAVID FUERTES
Vice Chair
DAPHNE HONMA
CASEY JARMAN
JAMAE KAWAUCHI
JOSEPH KEALOHA
SETH MURASHIGE
ALAPAKI NAHALE-A
SUSIE OSBORNE
TODD SHUMWAY
SCOTT UNGER
2009-2010
HAWAI‘I COUNTY
CHARTER COMMISSION
1
To: Members of the Hawai‘i County Charter Commission
From: Levi Hookano, Legal Counsel
Re: Proposed Amendment to the 2009-2010 Rules of Procedure: Provides the Procedure by
which Charter Amendments may be Proposed, Approved, and Adopted by the Charter
Commission.
Date: March 30, 2009
Members of the Hawai‘i County Charter Commission,
Below are proposed amendments to the 2009-2010 Rules of Procedure. These
amendments provide for the procedure of proposing amendments to the County Charter. Words
to be added are underscored. Words to be deleted are bracketed.
ARTICLE IX, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER, is hereby
amended as follows:
a. Form. All charter amendment proposals shall be prepared and submitted on the
CA-1 Form (attached as Exhibit A) with all applicable portions completed by a
Commission member.
b. Deadline to Propose Amendments. In order to ensure ample time to consider all
proposed amendments, proposed amendments must be submitted to the
Commission by October 31, 2009. Any proposed amendments submitted after
October 31, 2009 may be considered only upon a 2/3 vote of the entire
Commission. Regardless of the foregoing, the Commission will not accept any
proposed amendments submitted within 30 days of the Commission’s first
scheduled public hearing on the proposed charter amendments.
c. Proposals for a charter amendment shall require two readings, as specified by this
section, to be adopted and transmitted to the electorate. If the proposal does not receive a
favorable vote at either of the two readings, the proposal shall be deemed lost. The
following procedures shall be followed in the consideration, approval, and adoption of
proposals for a charter amendment:
1. Proposal is submitted for consideration by the Commission on Form CA-1. If the
proposal is accepted by the Commission for consideration, the proposal shall be
referred to an ad hoc committee to properly format the proposal for further
consideration. The ad hoc committee shall issue a report on the proposals at the
next regularly scheduled meeting following the referral.
2. At a meeting subsequent to the ad hoc committee report, the Commission shall
approve or disapprove of the ad hoc committee’s report. If the proposal is
disapproved at this step, the proposal shall be deemed lost and shall not be
considered again except upon a vote to reconsider. This step shall be considered
the first reading of the proposal.
3. Upon approval of a proposal by the Commission at first reading, the proposal
shall then be referred to the Commission’s legal counsel for review. The
Commission may also refer the proposal to appropriate agencies, organizations, or
persons for their recommendations regarding the proposal.
4. Within 20 days of receiving the proposal for review, legal counsel, and any
agency, organization, or person that received the proposal, shall submit a report to
the Commission with any recommendations or comments. The Commission may
then accept or reject the recommendations.
5. Upon consideration of any recommendations or comments by legal counsel, and
any agency, organization, or person that received the proposal, the Commission
shall then refer the proposal back to an ad hoc committee for further consideration
of the format and style of the proposal and for proper arrangement and order of all
proposals to be further considered by the Commission. The ad hoc committee
shall report its findings to the Commission by a deadline set by the Commission.
Any Commission action on the ad hoc committee report shall apply only to the
format and arrangement of the proposals, and not to the substance of the proposal
itself.
6. Once all proposals to amend the Charter have gone through the above process, the
Commission shall review all proposals on its merits, paying attention to the
manner in which each proposal relates to the Charter as a whole. This shall be
considered the second and final reading of a proposal. If a proposal is
substantively amended at this step, the proposal shall be held over until the next
meeting for further consideration.
7. Once all proposals have been thoroughly considered by the Commission, those
that have received final approval shall be submitted to an ad hoc committee for
proposing the form in which the approved charter amendments shall be submitted
to the electorate, including the proposed ballot language. The committee shall not
be authorized to propose that the electorate must approve the amendments as a
single package. The committee shall also be responsible for proposing and
2
implementing a public education program to acquaint the electorate with the
proposed amendments.
Thank you for your consideration of the above proposed changes to the Rules of Procedure. If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Levi Hookano
3