HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMM. 111 Goodenow, K - CA-20 KENNETH G. GOODENOW
County Clerk
County of Hawai‘i
Office of the County Clerk
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720
Telephone: (808) 961-8255
Facsimile: (808) 961-8912
RODNEY OSHIRO
Deputy County Clerk
December 15, 2009
Sent via e-mail to keoff@co.hawaii.hi.us; no hard copy will follow
Honorable Edmund Hiatsuka and Members of the
County of Hawai‘i Charter Commission
c/o Hawai‘i County Council
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720
RE: Comments about Charter Amendment Proposal CA-20
Dear Chairman Hiatsuka and Commission Members:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on proposed Charter amendment CA-
20 which would add a section to Article III to create a requirement that the county
council establish standing committees composed of all council members.
The Office of the County Clerk provides the following comments regarding this
proposal:
1) The proposed amendment states that “[t]he Council shall have the right to
determine how many standing committees it needs.” This seems to be in conflict
with the provision that “[t]he county council shall establish standing committees.”
Does this mean the council might be sued if it decides to establish only one or no
committees?
2) The proposed amendment states that “[i]t shall be the duty of the standing
committees to investigate, consider, and make recommendations to the council on
matters referred to the respective committees,” yet there is no guidance as to the
referral process. Presumably the council chair may decide not to refer a matter to
a committee at all, but this is not clear.
Serving the Interests of the People of Our Island
Hawai‘i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
Honorable Edmund Hiatsuka and Members of the
County of Hawai‘i Charter Commission
Re: CA-20
December 15, 2009
Page 2
3) The proposed amendment also states that the council “shall have the right to
determine…the subject matter that each committee shall control.” Some
legislation may involve more than one committee; would this amendment require
multiple committee referrals or open the county to litigation if a certain committee
did not review a matter prior to council action?
4) In my opinion, this proposed section is not the appropriate place to include filing
and posting requirements, unless the Commission desires to make these
provisions applicable to committee agendas only. I also note that no other county
charter in our state includes provisions relating to council agenda procedures or
posting requirements.
5) Our office’s Legislative Research Branch reviewed the charters and rules of
procedure of the other three counties in our state and numerous charters from
other jurisdictions. In no case was it found that all board members served on all
committees; Hawai‘i County seems to be unique in this regard.
6) The proposed amendment states that standing committees are to be established “in
order to expedite the business of the council.” It is hard to understand how this
would be accomplished if all members serve on every committee.
7) As noted in Robert’s Rules of Order, 10th Edition, the term committee implies
that, within the area of its responsibilities, a committee has less authority to act
independently than a board is usually understood to have. Indeed, according CA-
20, the committees only make recommendations to the council, as is the current
practice. As committee action has no legal bearing on the validity of an ordinance
or resolution, i.e., the council could pass a matter that received a negative
recommendation by a committee, letting the council itself determine its internal
procedures is more appropriate in my opinion.
If I can provide further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 961-8271.
Yours, very truly,
KENNETH G. GOODENOW
County Clerk