HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMM. 104 e.�
g/ �.rinaince J.acfmrd, g4. 808 322-2784
Jizeizae/i ji. ✓u eaurcv
November 7,1979
Kimiaki Sakata, Chairman
Hawaii County Charter Commission
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Dear Kimiaki:
I regret that I am unable to be present for the last scheduled
Charter Commission meeting. Unfortunately, due to other previously
committed matters, it became impossible for me to reschedule my
carlm ttments.
I wish to convey to you and all of my other fellow
commissioners my appreciation for having had the opportunity to share an
experience with all of you. Though we did not share similarly in all
principles of government, we all did share in one common factor--our
sincerity in pursuing the principle we each felt was best for our
county.
In spite of what may have been reported in the media, I feel
that on the basis of what was presented to us and the budgetary
limitation under which we operated, the final product of the commission
was a good one. I for one feel, and I believe all of us should feel
similarly, that the results of the commission represent a progressive
step towards a more responsive and responsible government.
I believe that the commission's work was not without error. I
have noted some comments which I believe future commissions should take
into consideration. I ask that said comments be filed with the minutes
of the commission.
I, again, wish to thank you and all of the other commissioners
for having had the opportunity to share in this experience and for
having had the opportunity to get to know all of you personally. I
found it to be most rewarding and memorable.
Gook luck to all of you and may God bless all of you.
Sincerely
-,72
idhard T. Ishida
COMM. N,) ____/:2 .„
COMMENTS ON 1979 CHARTER COMMISSION
1. I believe that any future charter review commission should
investigate into the feasibility of employing a full time salaried staff
member, excluding the secretary and attorney which may remain parttime,
who is familiar with the operation of a government and whose principle
duties are to research and gather information for the commission, draft
new proposed provisions and being responsible for the care of all re-
cords so that the commission will be kept well informed on every and all
subjects when discussed.
2. I believe that future commissions should conduct two sets
of public hearings. The first to gather input prior to adopting any
proposed changes and the second to hear remarks to proposed changes
tentatively adopted by the commission. I believe if the first review
commission had done this, we would have received the clear objections to
the three proposals which were defeated. Also, we would not have had
the problems we were faced concerning the council make up proposal.
3. Hold charter elections together with general elections.
While the first charter review commission's decision to hold an off year
special election so as not to detract from the importance of charter
proposals, the apathetic attitude of the citizens do not warrant the
county incurring the substantial cost of a special election. In spite
of the media controversy experienced just prior to the special election,
which brought attention of the special election to the citizens, the
turnout was most disappointing.