Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHC 1979-08-20 HAWAII COUNTY CHARTER COMMISSION MINUTES 31st Session August 20, 1979 Hilo, Hawaii The thirty-first session of the Hawaii County Charter Commission was called to order at 4:08 p.m. in the Hawaii County Councilroom, Hawaii County Building, Hilo, Hawaii by Mr. Kimiaki Sakata, Chairman. The roll recorded the following: Present: Mr. Harlan Cadinha Mr. Richard Ishida Mrs. Amy Iwamoto Mrs. Gloria Kobayashi Mr. Akira Omonaka Mr. Kimiaki Sakata Mr. Spencer Kalani Schutte Mr. Herman Sensano Mr. Joseph Trulson Mr. Matsuo Yanaga Mr. Basilio Yagong Also Mr. Stuart Oda, Attorney Present: Mr. Yasuki Arakaki, Deputy County Clerk Ms. Frances Higa, Research Assistant Mrs. Joan Carnett, Secretary APPROVAL Motion was made to defer approval OF MINUTES: of minutes dated August 14, 1979, until the commission has had the opportunity to read them; by Mrs. Kobayashi. Seconded by Mr. Schutte and unanimously carried. COMMUNI- The following communications were considered: CATIONS: Comm. 88: Letter from Richard T. Ishida, Charter Commission member, dated August 11, 1979, requeg-ting action on Section 3-2, Article III be deferred due to his inability to attend scheduled meeting. Comm. 89: Letter from Walt Southward, dated August 10, 1979, regarding the educational program on the proposed charter amendments. Motion was made by Mr. Trulson to receive and file Communications #88 and #89. Seconded by Mrs. Kobayashi and unanimously carried. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Before we go on to the business of the day, we have the Charter Commission budget before us. This would be for the publication, as printed, and the allocation right now as stated on your financial sheet. There are some blank areas here and I would like to call on Mr. Arakaki for any other information on this. Do you have anything on this, Yasuki? MR. ARAKAKI : Since I gave this to Gloria some time ago, I would like to make some amendments to the first part of this expenditure on the Hawaii Tribune-Herald. The figure for the Hawaii Tribune-Herald 16-page tabloid, 19,000 copies, which has a tentative schedule to go out on September 16, Sunday, is to be $5,349. 12. We are going to print 45 ,000 extra copies , 5 ,000 to be distributed by the West Hawaii Today and 40,000 to precinct and station distribution by the Election Division of the County Clerk 's Office. That amount will be $2,000. West Hawaii Today distribution of the 5 ,000 copies will be $640. The Hawaii Tribune-Herald costs on printing 3,000 copies, typeset, tabloid and all the complete detail will cost us $1;026. The figure on Hawaii Times on Kanji Katakana typeset and the distribution of 1 , 200 Big Island subscribers and an extra printing of 5 , 000 copies--those .:figures are not available as yet. The translation cost for the 16-page tabloid on the Japanese is $2,500. The same for the Ilocano translation. I see by the reading of the minutes, Bill Kikuchi ' s expenditures will be $3,600. On the figures on the sheet that I gave to Mrs. Kobayashi last week, the translation costs on ballots and posters will be paid by the Election Division, not from your account. This is my report and if we can get The Hawaii Times costs, I can tell you exactly what the total cost is going to be for your commission ' s account. If you have any questions? CHAIRMAN SAKATA: The Japanese translation will be the same as the Ilocano, right? -2- MR. ARAKAKI: Correct. I was able to anchor this down because I had some figures to bargain with. Actually, the cost of the Maui one was $2,800 because the $300 extra was sept to Japan for proofreading for proper interpretation of a legal document. We decided not to send them to Japan so we will save the $300. The same thing with the Ilocano one. The Ilocano one was $2,680, instead of $2,500. The $180 was paid to this individual for proofreading, for the actual time performed, but I was able to have an agreement that proofreading on work done, typeset, by the Tribune-Herald--the cost of proofreading will be included in this amount also. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Do any of the other commissioners have any questions to ask Mr. Arakaki on the printing costs and budget? Nothing? Thank you very much, Mr. Arakaki. MR. ISHIDA: Mr. Chairman. Before you go into the business of the day, I would just like to orally express my appreciation to my fellow commission members for consenting to my request of last week. I know this creates somewhat of a burden upon us, but, again, I just want to take this time to express my appreciation to all of you. ARTICLE III CHAIRMAN SAKATA: We will go into the business SECTION 3-2: of the day which would be the finalization of the charter revisions. When I left and in the next one of the meetings I think a motion that was on the floor was deferred. It was Mr. Trulson 's motion and this was deferred to the next meeting. The meeting was postponed last week and action on that was deferred until this one. Mr. Trulson, what was that motion? MR. TRULSON: That motion was to amend the ballot to have a single option and that was the 5-4 council makeup. The five from the 4 representative districts. . .one from district #1, two from district #2, one from districts #3 and #4. And four at-large. The at-large would be 4-year terms. The districts would be 2-year terms with district residency require- ments. That' s the motion. MR. CADINHA: I second. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any questions on this? MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman. I would like to comment on my reasoning for the motion. I feel that we need the 9 member council. I feel that the 5-4 with this type of setup will give each district a majority representation. In other words, each person in each district is voting for 5 councilmen which is a majority of the council makeup. -3- I think that it will serve the county better than any other makeup for both East and West Hawaii. We have had a lot of debate from people who are in favor of a 5-4. Last week we had people here who spoke in favor of the 5-4. Mr. Santos stated the 5-2 or the 5-4. I think that ' s good reason to support this amendment. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any other discussion? . MR. ISHIDA: Mr. Chairman. I 'd like to just state again in support of this 5-4 plan. I don 't want to again just reiterate what has earlier been stated in our commission discussions. However, briefly, I would just like to state that we've been going over this many, many times all the options that were presented to the commission, in our attempt to present what we felt to be best, to the citizens of the county. We had originally indicated that possibly we should have some options presented to them. However, in view of the fact that we are unable to do that, we have to decide at least on one plan to be presented to the citizens and, of course, today we will have to decide which one that will be. There have been many arguments for and against each of the plans. I cannot state that any of the arguments that have been presented are totally inapplicable and erroneous. The arguments in support of each have some merit, I must add. They have been based upon certain arguments and presentations that were made during our public hearings. I would just like to indicate that the major alternatives to the 5-4 plan, apparently, are what we have classified to be the 5-2 and the 9 single member. I would just like to indicate to all of you that as far as the 5-2 is concerned , I think the basis was to present a plan to the citizens whereby there has been much in the way of requests and arguments in behalf of more local representation. Consequently, this is why I believe the commission desired to have at least a limited form of local representation. This is why we decided to have at least five. Then the 2 at-large was decided upon in view of the fact, I think, there was a sizeable portion of people as far as this island is concerned who felt that at- large candidates would be more beneficial. The only thing that I have as far as that is concerned, is that I cannot really quarrel whether seven should be a good number or nine, but, I think, if we are to make the 5-2 a workable kind of situation--or what I refer to as the seven member council to be workable--then I think the breakdown should be a 4-3 type of situation. I cannot see how 5-2 would be workable. Mainly because as I had indicated, which is in accord with my feelings of a 5-4, that each electorate will be able to vote for a majority of county council members in that type of makeup. -4- In a 9 single member district, I think one of the main arguments that has been presented in behalf of that is that they wanted local representation because they felt that the at-large representation took that away. In other words, gave the more populated areas a so-called control over who our councilmembers would be and if we had single member districts, then we would be able to probably have more diverse representation in the council. The only weakness I feel in that position is that because of the makeup of this island and this county, that to separate and divide this island into 9 single member districts, I think, what is going to come out is you're going to have districts whereby a small portion, or a portion of that district will be able to control that particular representative or councilman from that specific district which, in turn, will create a situation where a small portion of residents within that district will forever be disenfranchised. The problem I see is where you have a situation where Ka'u might be involved where you have Naalehu and Pahala and how are you going to decide a situation where there is a huge rift between, say, Naalehu and Pahala? The more populated area is going to be able to control the representative from that district. What I think the 9 member plan was attempting to correct, might, instead, be counter-productive. This is one reason why I believe that at this stage of the development of the County of Hawaii, this 9 single member district is not workable. And this is why, I believe, we should have a situation where we do have some single member representation, some district represent- ation and then we have some at-large. I believe that as far as this county is concerned it' s_,best that we have a ,5-4 form of representation as far as council members are concerned and this is why I believe we should have it. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any other discussion on this? None? Are you ready for the question? Mr. Trulson ' s motion on the floor would be five from the districts and four at-large. Right? Is everybody ready for the question? Ayes - Cadinha, Noes - Yanaga, Trulson, Kobayashi, Iwamoto, Yagong, Ishida, Omonaka, Schutte Sensano, 5 Sakata - 6 Not carried. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: In June I voted for the 5-2 and when I 'left on my vacation, I thought that everthing was going to be all settled and when I came back everything was up in the air and because of the options that were not feasible to put on the ballot and we had to go back to this basic -5- problem of trying to get one option and then having the status quo so that we can get a majority on the ballot. . . looking at the proposals from all and having this agony of trying to make the final decision again today, I have to go to my former decision of 5-2. So I would say "nay" on this. So ny vote will be no. What is the count, now? 6-5? Six noes and five yeas. MR. OMONAKA: Mr. Chairman. I would like to move that we adopt a 5-2 plan as we previously discussed and I want my motion to include that, similar to Mr. Trulson, we just have one option. The present status quo and this so-called 5-2 plan. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: We have the motion. Do I have a second to that? MRS. KOBAYASHI: Second. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: It has been moved and seconded that we go on this 5-2, 5 district and 2 at-large and that this be one option with the status quo. MR. ISHIDA: Mr. Chairman. Just for the record, on this 5-2 could we also include the terms so that there won't be any question? CHAIRMAN SAKATA: That would be 5 councilmen from the districts serving a 2-year term and 2 at-large councilmen serving a 4-year term. That ' s the term, right? MR. OMONAKA: Taken from the respective current House Representative Districts and the only exception being the 2nd district getting two councilmen until such time as the reapportionment committee can reapportion the districts. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any other discussion on this? If not, are you ready for the question? MR. CADINHA: Mr. Chairman. Mr. Sensano, awhile back, recommended a hybrid situation that I didn 't pa'/J.much attention to but it seems to make a lot of sense to me. I 'd like to move that we amend Mr. Omonaka' s motion to read 5 district candidates ;fOr;:;2-year terms, 2 at-large candidates from East Hawaii and 2 at-large candidates from West Hawaii. The West Hawaii candidates would mean South Kohala thr•ough. Ka'u. The West Hawaii candidates would be North Kohala through Kona. MR. SCHUTTE: I second that motion. MR. OMONAKA: Mr. Chairman. I would like to call a point of order. I think the concept here is a 7 man council and I don 't think that amendment is germane to the motion. Can we have a ruling on that? -6- MR. ODA: Mr. Chairman, as far as I can tell, the objection, if I can call_ it .that, is quite appropriate. This is changing the entire nature of the motion which was previously made so it would require a new motion at such time as it can be entertained. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Then Mr. Omonaka' s motion still stands? MR. ODA: Right. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Cadinha, do you have anything to say? MR. CADINHA: No. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Are you ready for the question? The motion now is 5 from the districts and 2 at-large and the terms will be 5 district councilmen for 2-year terms and 2 at- large councilmen for 4-year terms. MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Chairman. I don't know how good it will be but whatever the situation, I 'd like to say something in regard to this. I would like to call your attention to a statement made by Mr. Sensano. A very eloquent statement made on July 18, 1979 at this Charter Review Commission and I quote. . ."Only a fool or a very strong headed individual would not change his mind if a compromise is required on an issue, but not on a principle , and to me the member composition of the council is an issue, not a principle. " I have strongly supported district representation as I believe that, everyone should be accountable to the area that he or she is elected to represent. The at-large candidacy is e*cellent if one can adhere to the philosophy that representa- tion is considered and excelled to all the constituents within the county. I know there is a present motion on the floor for a 5-2 council makeup. I certainly hope that those individuals that would have it in their minds to be so considerate as to take into consideration the 5-2-2 which would give the Western side of the island an at-large--2 at-large candidates and also the Eastern side of the island 2 at-large candidates with a 5 district makeup. What this all amounts to, as far as I 'm concerned, is Mr. Sensano made a very eloquent statement when he said that. I think I made note of that at that time and I 'd like to make note of it again. I would ,to hope that we could suggest a proposal of 5-2-2 and that it would be carried by this commission.. today. I -think- the -responsibility- that we have has a lot to do with the consideration that we have for those individuals we represent and giving them the opportunity to make their own decisions. If you are talking about an at-large situation, you have that right now. What we're looking at is bringing government a little closer to the people and all we're looking for is two more additional candidates, if this be the case, for the Western side of island. -7- I don 't know if this is a point of order . Whether the 5-2 proposal that Mr. Omonaka has suggested is open to a 5-2-2 consideration or not. MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman. I 'd like to concur with Commissioner Schutte and I would also support the 5-2-2 compromise. MR. SENSANO: Mr. Chairman. just to clear the record, I would like to explain when I made the statement that I was under the impression that we could get two proposals in addition to the present 9 member council. Therefore, at that time, I proposed that the two in addition to the present 9 setup, 9 member council setup that we have, be presented to the voters. 5-2 and 5-4, seven and nine member council. But since we only have one additional choice in addition to the present 9 member council, that will change the background of my statement. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any other comments or discussion on this? Are you ready for the question? Ayes - Kobayashi, Noes Trulson, Yagong, Iwamoto, Omonaka, Ishida, Sensano, Schutte, Yanaga, Cadinha Sakata - 5 - 6 Carried. MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman. I would like to make a motion to amend the amendment of the 5-2 to change it to 5-2-2 as outlined by Commissioner Schutte. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Oda, this has carried. MR. TRULSON: I made a motion for an amendment to the amendment. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: We voted on this and it has been carried. Can we make an amendment to change this now? NRR. ODA: I think the present motion is appropriate, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: You want to go to a 5. .? MR. TRULSON: A 5-2-2. Mid. CADINHA: I ' ll second. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any discussion on this motion of 5-2-2? -8- MR. OMONAKA: Mr. Chairman. Did you accept that motion? CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Oda said it was okay. MR. OMONAKA: I thought we already acted on this. It carried by the majority of the commissioners and I think any other motion to that subject would be out of order unless there was a motion to reconsider. If the subject matter is carried upon by the majority of the commission, are you saying that the same subject matter can come up again? MR. ODA: I 'm just basing it on what we have already done. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: The motion is on the 5-2-2. Mr. Cadinha, you seconded this, didn 't you? MR. CADINHA: Yes. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any discussion on this? MR. OMONAKA: Mr. Chairman. I still am not too clear. What motion are you amending? The motion is already carried. MR. TRULSON: That' s a motion to amend the amendment that has already been carried. Mr. Cadinha could not do it before because your motion for amendment had not been voted on. Now it has been and as I understand the rules of order, you can make a motion to amend the amendment as long as it is in the same vein. RECESS: At 4:41 p.m. the Chair called for a short recess. RECONVENE: At 4:50 p.m. the meeting was reconvened. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Oda, would you give us an opinion on that? MR. ODA: Mr. Chairman , I can only refer to certain portions of Robert ' s Rules with regard to amendments. I would specifically refer to Rule #56 in regard to motions to modify or amend and the rules do not seem to--at least, I haven 't found any specific rule or section applicable to the question presented. However, there is a--during the recess-- there is a provision that I came across which depending on whether Mr. Trulson ' s motion is an attempted amendment of an amendment--under the rule #56. . "an amendment of an amendment cannot be made. " Now, if Mr. Omoraka' s motion was an amendment -9- of the previous decision of this commission which was having three separate options in addition to the status quo, then an amendment of an amendment under this rule cannot be made since there already is an amendment. Assuming Mr. Omonaka' s motion is an amendment. MR. TRULSON: Mr. Omonaka has stated that his was not an amendment. MR. OMONAKA: Let's get a ruling. MR. ODA: I think Mr. Omonaka's motion was an amendment of the previous adoption of the three options by deleting the two other options. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Then Mr. Trulson 's. . . MR. ODA: Is a motion to amend an amendment, so, it looks like it is out of order. MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion to amend the Rules of Procedure to reconsider, add to, or amend, those sections of the Charter that have already been moved on previously. MR. ODA: _ What was that? A motion to reconsider? MR. TRULSON: I would like to make a motion to amend the Rules of Procedure in order to reconsider, add to, or amend, those sections of the Charter that may have been moved on previously. MR. CADINHA: Mr. Chairman. To clarify a little confusion here. Mr. Oda, what was your ruling on Mr. Trulson 's motion? MR. ODA: It ' s out of order. MR. CADINHA: It is out of order? CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Trulson 's motion was to amend the Rules of Procedure to reconsider all the others? MR. TRULSON: Basically, to get back to the same subject, yes. MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Chairman. Mr. Oda, is that in line? MR. ODA: I would think not, Mr. Schutte. Basically, I think that motion is a motion to reconsider and based on the broad scope of that motion, I do believe it ' s not timely at this time because it is to reconsider all. . . MR. TRULSON: It' s to reconsider 3-2. MR. ODA: Reconsider 3-2? Then it would be timely. -10- MR. SCHUTTE: And as a result, another motion could follow this? Another proposal? MR. ODA: Not to amend. MR. SCHUTTE: No. What could the motion be then? MR. ODA: As previously stated, Mr. Schutte, the motion to reconsider has to take place during the same session or the next session, at the latest, otherwise it ' s not timely. I assume that Mr. Trulson 's motion is, in effect, to suspend the rules to reconsider. MR. TRULSON: That 's not my intent. MR. ODA: I don 't know. MR. TRULSON: I cannot move to reconsider. MR. SCHUTTE: Well, to find out what Mr. Trulson has in mind, I ' ll second his motion. MR. OMONAKA: Bud, your motion; if I understand it, is to suspend the Rules of Procedure with regard to the draft of the amendments? MR. TRULSON: With regards to Section 3-2 only. MR. OMONAKA: Only 3-2? MR. TRULSON: Yes. MR. OMONAKA: Point of order. MR. TRULSON: He already ruled on that. MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Chairman. I think the whole intent of Mr. Trulson ' s motion, at this time, is to get the proposal of a 5-2-2 on the floor. If the proponents of the 5-2 are so inclined to allow it to come to the floor we could finish this once and for all. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: If this motion is proper and it is in order, we will have to bring it up. It's in order, right? MR. ODA: The motion to suspend the rules? CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Of procedure and to reconsider just Section 3-2, Mr. Trulson? MR. TRULSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Just Section 3-2? It ' s in order? -11- MR. ODA: I think it is. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: So it has been moved and seconded right now. Okay. Any other discussion on this? Are you ready for the question? Ayes - Iwamoto, Noes - Yagong, Ishida, Omonaka, Schutte, Sensano, Trulson, Kobayashi Cadinha Yanaga, 5 Sakata - 6 Not carried. MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman. Evidently, now the issue has been settled. I would just like to say one thing and that is I 'm just sorry to see we have not been able to get all proposals voted on because of parliamentary procedure. To me, it seems . a shame. That' s my personal feeling. MR. CADINHA: Mr. Chairman. I move to adjourn. MR. OMONAKA: Second. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Did you move for adjournment, Mr. Cadinha? MR. CADINHA: Yes. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Do we have a second on that? Mr. Omonaka? MRS. KOBAYASHI : Mr. Chairman. May I bring up something before we adjourn? We do have before us the introduction that was passed out. The introduction is supposed to be the introduction to the newspaper tabloid that is coming out September 16. I have a page, too, that goes with this introduction. It,,;would be nice if the commissioners would-- could look this over since this is the copy that is going to be under the commission ' s name, but if this body wants to adjourn, then. . . I would like to have an approval on this because it is wording that introduces the charter to the people. And, also, along this line, we did want to schedule, possibly, for next week a meeting to go over the newspaper tabloid because once it comes out the people might be asking us questions as to what is in it. I think, as commissioners, we have a duty to answer any questions that will come up after the newspaper tabloid is out. If we don 't know what ' s in it--we can ' t say we don ' t know what' s in it because really, we worked on the charter. It was suggested that there be a briefing meeting next week sometime to go over whatever will be in the newspaper tabloid. -12- MR. TRULSON: Mrs. Kobayashi, the briefing session would be with the whole commission? MRS. KOBAYASHI : Mr. Kikuchi would conduct it. I would like the whole commission to be here because we are all involved. We are going to have our pictures on the front page of that. thing and if we don't know what's in it, it ' s not too good. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Before we adjourn this meeting then, would you like to schedule next *eek 's meeting? MRS. KOBAYASHI : Yes, I would like to schedule a meeting. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Oda, would you be free on Tuesday? MR. ODA: I 'm not sure. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Will next week Tuesday, on the 28th be appropriate for all of you? For a meeting with Mr. Kikuchi? MR. OMONAKA: I cannot be here. MR. CADINHA: I can 't either, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: What about Wednesday, then? MR. CADINHA: I 'm busy the whole week. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Wednesday cannot? Monday again? MRS. KOBAYASHI : We just want a session to go over the tabloid before it comes out so that we know what it is going to be like. MR. SCHUTTE : Make it Tuesday. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Tuesday? Harlan cannot be here on Tuesday. MRS. KOBAYASHI : He cannot be here the whole week. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Wednesday? Mrs. Iwamoto? Wednesday? 4 o'clock? MRS. IWAMOTO: 4 o'clock, yes. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Kikuchi , I don 't think it would take two hours, would it? -13- MR. KIKUCHI : About an hour and a half. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: An hour and a half. Okay, shall we meet at 4 o'clock next Wednesday, then? MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman. Is that going to give Mr. Kikuchi time? Mr. Kikuchi, would that be timewise okay to defer it until next week? MR. KIKUCHI: Yes. CHAIRMAN SAKATA: It has been moved and seconded that we adjourn the meeting. A11 those in favor? Carried. Meeting is adjourned. ADJOURNMENT: At 5 :06 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Next meeting date - Wednesday, August 29, 1979,: 4:00 p.m. , Hawaii County Councilroom, Hilo, Hawaii. oan Carnett, RECORDING SECRETARY -14- • 411 CHARTER CM•fISSION BUDGET • Present Allocation 79/80 FY for Publication and Printing $4,700.00 Expenditures Hawaii Tribune Herald 5 349x2=- 16 pages Tabloid X 84" equal 1,344" X 3.98 19,000 copies on Sept 16 Extra tabloid 16 pages 45,000 X .04444¢ 2,000.00 5M to WEST.HAWAII TODAY 40M to Precinct and station distribution WEST HAWAII TODAY 16 pages X 5000 copies X $125.00 per M pages 640.00 Hawaii -- -. H aii Tribune Herald 16 pages Tabloid typeset cost Ilocano Edition Printing Cost for Ilocano issues 16 pages 3000 copies (1000 for Elderly) .342 copy 1,026.00 (2000 for Precinct/Stations) Hawaii Times Cost of printing kanji/katakana Typeset • 16 pages tabloid Cost of printing/distribution 1,200 subscribers Cost of printing 5000 extras (2000 for Precinct/Stations) (3000 for Elderly) HALT (Hawaii Assn of Language Teachers) Translation cost of 16 pages tabloid to Japanese 2,500.00 MRS CRESCENCI4.DOMINGO • Translation cost of 16 pages tabloid in Ilocano _ 2,500.00 HALT — Translation to-..Japanese ballots, posters, etc MRS CRESCENCIA DOMINGO • Translation to Ilocano ballots, posters, etc BILL KIKUCHI'S TECHNICAL SERVICES Graphic arts . others •