My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comm No 0003.01.45 - Testimony - Ad Hoc - PONC fund and Maintenance fund
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2018
>
Communications
>
Comm No 0003.01.45 - Testimony - Ad Hoc - PONC fund and Maintenance fund
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2019 7:30:53 AM
Creation date
12/17/2018 9:11:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HAWAII COUNTY CHARTER COMMISSION 1:30 P.M. DECEMBER 14, 2018 <br />WEST HAWAII CIVIC CENTER <br />TESTIMONY FROM SUSAN DURSIN, SOUTH KONA <br />Aloha Chair Adams and Commission Members: <br />My name is Susan Dursin. I am speaking today on my own behalf. While I appreciate the work of the <br />Charter Commission, I also want to thank members of the PONC Commission. Their work in carrying out <br />the voters' wishes is much appreciated. <br />I am opposed to reducing or capping amounts for land acquisition. Voters who passed the PONC <br />Charter amendments had the long view. They were not thinking in ten or twenty year horizons. They <br />wanted protected open space for future Big Island residents, and they were willing to spend certain <br />amounts to that end. <br />Yes, the fund may accumulate, but having a large amount available, and having it protected in <br />perpetuity allows the purchase of favored, highly valuable property when it becomes available. It also <br />ensures interest in matching funds. <br />I ask that the Ad Hoc Committee continue their review of Charter provisions relating to PONC. The <br />report includes no interviews with members of staff, commission members, groups applying for <br />maintenance funding, or organizations with land conservation experience. Much can be learned by <br />continuing the review, especially about process. <br />There is no doubt that PONC could be administered more effectively. It was clear early on the Parks and <br />Recreation had their hands full, besides having a bias that does not necessarily favor PONC. Moving <br />PONC to Finance would be an improvement. The fact remains, however, that there is no one with the <br />time and authority to focus on negotiating land purchases, monitoring maintenance and management, <br />and setting up matching funds. PONC badly needs staff, dedicated wholly to PONC. They can be paid <br />out of PONC funds. <br />Once again, I thank you for your service on the Charter Commission, and thank you for considering my <br />testimony. <br />Comm. No. 3.1.45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.