Laserfiche WebLink
TESTIMONY OF RICK WARSHAUER TO CHARTER COMMISSION, 25JAN19 <br />would really like to see the Charter Commission forwarding to the ballot some more measures <br />that I could support—measures that would benefit the county's people and 'aina. CA -9 is one <br />such constructive measure that would greatly enhance the PONC's Maintenance Fund. It <br />centralizes the operations and administration of the PONC program within the Finance <br />Department, which will refine this evolving program that actually responds to public requests to <br />preserve meaningful lands. However, it would be pointless if the other two PONC measures <br />before you succeed in altering the charter. <br />As I testified December 14, CA -7 would gut the PONC program and relegate the program's <br />funding to the momentary whims of the administration and council. CA -13 is equally appalling <br />and most likely will result in similar defunding. You should not move either measure forward. <br />notice in the county's county code website, that the PONC fund portions (Art. 42) are flanked by <br />two other special funds: (1) the Disaster and Emergency Fund (Art. 41, to accumulate sufficient <br />supplemental financial resources to respond to public health and safety emergencies) and (2) the <br />Budget Stabilization Fund (Art. 43, to be used as a temporary, supplementary source of funds for <br />times of financial hardships). These special funds already exist for the purposes purported in CA - <br />13. Successive administration's lack of fiscal discipline to correctly utilize these funds —that is not <br />to raid them regularly—should not be an excuse to embed another raiding mechanism into the <br />charter. Do not pass forward this pointless proposal. Kill it now. <br />Contrast the negative nature of these proposals (CA -7 and CA -13) to the words of Gov. Ige in his <br />state of the state message last Tuesday: "These places are worth saving for us and for future <br />generations. That's why we are requesting increased funding for land conservation, by removing <br />the $6.8 -million cap on the 10 -percent conveyance tax to the Legacy Land Conservation Program." <br />In this age of wholesale off -shore purchase of our 'aina and wahi pana, Governor Ige recognizes <br />the importance of preserving those special lands advocated for and nominated by the PEOPLE in <br />the state's equivalent of the PONC program. Why can't you? <br />These two land conservation programs, and those of Maui, Honolulu and Kauai counties, are very <br />popular and vital. They are popular because they are the PEOPLE's small part of government <br />where residents can have a big say in saving from development some of the wahi pana that they <br />cherish. Residents nominate lands and advocate for them at meetings of their commissions. Do <br />not confuse these land conservation processes with those that acquire lands for other public <br />purposes like needed infrastructure, or even parks, which are usually taken from state lands. <br />These lands are from the people's wishes for the people's future. Don't thwart them with <br />destructive proposals. Please follow your hearts, not bad suggestions. <br />Comm. No. 24.84 <br />