My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD SMA REPORT - S. MCMICHAEL TESTIMONY 11.15.2022
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2022
>
2022-11-17 Leeward
>
PD Director's Report
>
PD SMA REPORT - S. MCMICHAEL TESTIMONY 11.15.2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2022 8:58:12 AM
Creation date
11/15/2022 8:56:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Araujo, Jaclyn <br />From: Simmy <simmy808@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 8:50 AM <br />To: LPCtestimony; Council Testimony <br />Subject: Fwd: West Hawaii Today eEdition Article <br />Attachments: SMA Rule 9 not signed by Mayor instead managing directorjpg; SMA rule 9 <br />$500Kjpg <br />Aloha, <br />My name is Simmy McMichael, Kanaka Ma'oli, born in the TERRITORY OF HAWAII. <br />This was today's front-page news of WHT. <br />This seems to be on my issues of the County hearing all of this week Both the County Council <br />as well as the Leeward Planning. So, I wanted to make comments to triggering SMA Permit EXEMPTIONS. <br />Avoiding the SMA is avoiding the trigger to HRS 343-5, important to all of this area an Environmental Assessment <br />Requirement. <br />As of right now the County of Hawaii has the Special Management Area of a single-family resident area permit at 7,500 <br />sq ft. <br />Proposal now would be statewide of 5,000 sq. ft suggested by Maui. <br />My question now, is the 7,500 sq. ft. in the first place, legal? Why was it not signed off by Major Harry Kim of 2017. <br />This was heard at the Leeward Planning Commission in Kona, and the Windward Planning Commission via satellite, <br />October 30, 2017. <br />1 attended and testified against this, as well as 3 other attorneys. All testified was Against this and spoke within our limit <br />of 3 minutes. <br />Then later, one of the attorneys stepped up and went to whisper to the Chairperson, he nodded in a yes motion. <br />The outcome was then it passed. <br />Brought to my attention, as I'm witnessing now a lot off Ali'i Drive registered of the Kahalu'u Historic District being <br />Desecrated. <br />Bulldozing sacred inadvertent caves, natural spring well. Nearby, is the St. Peters Church, and Ku'e Manu, <br />The lot located next to the largest archeological site found in the State of Hawai'i. How could there not be Burials is a <br />huge concern. <br />How is there no US Army of Engineering Permit, as the digging are so deep their noticeable water. <br />Kahaluu Beach is near, and how is our Ocean not going to be polluted. <br />Whatever you do Mauka, affects Makai. <br />I questioned how this is being allowed and the Public and Neighbors were not even notified. <br />Per email they are not required. <br />I was sent a link recently by the Planning Staff to educate myself to why it is permitted avoiding the SMA process. <br />I educated myself to Rule No. 9. and took notice of the approval on the last page. <br />Appears it should have been signed by Mayor Harry Kim of 2017, but instead crossed off. See attached. <br />Instead approved by a managing director(?) <br />This is more footage than Maui, 7,000 sq ft. Changes across the board is 5,000 sq ft so that it would not trigger a SMA <br />permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.