Laserfiche WebLink
R DLFujimoto_SMA 4/1/23 <br /> COUNTY OF HAWAI`I PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> D&L FUJIMOTO LLC <br /> SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA USE PERMIT APPLICATION <br /> (PL-SMA-2023-000027) <br /> Upon careful review of the applicant's request against the guidelines for granting of a Special <br /> Management Area Use Permit, the Planning Director recommends that this request to delete <br /> Condition No. 7 (public parking requirement) of Special Management Area (SMA) Use Permit <br /> No. 51 (SMA 51) to clarify the management and use of twenty (20) public parking stalls located <br /> on a 1.468-acre parcel situated within the Special Management Area (SMA) be approved by the <br /> Planning Commission. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public <br /> testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this recommendation based upon <br /> additional information presented at the public hearing. This approval recommendation is based <br /> on the following: <br /> D&L Fujimoto LLC (Applicant) seeks approval to delete condition No. 7 (public parking <br /> requirement) of SMA 51 in order to exercise reasonable controls over the "public use" <br /> parking area on its property. Condition No. 7 of SMA 51 designated twenty (20) parking <br /> stalls on the makai side of the proposed building for public use without any restrictions or <br /> controls. The existing building located on the subject parcel houses a variety of uses <br /> consistent with the site's resort zoning (V-.75) and the parking stalls designated under <br /> SMA No. 51 have continued to be set aside for the public. However, there has been on- <br /> going abuse of the unlimited free public parking which is counter to the intent of the <br /> parking area and the safety of the public as there are no restrictions on these twenty (20) <br /> parking stalls. The condition on the SMA Use Permit was a requirement for approval, <br /> however, parking is not one of the SMA policies, objectives, or guidelines that are <br /> considered unless it is connected to shoreline access, which this site is not. As noted in <br /> the Topliss v. Hawaii County Planning Commission decision, the Commission's actions <br /> (including conditions) must have a reasonable relationship to the SMA objectives and <br /> policies. The Intermediate Court of Appeals in 1993 in that case opined that "if traffic <br /> -1- <br />