My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Tim Furst Testimony 06.27.23
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2023
>
2023-07-07 Windward
>
Item 4 Robert J. Silber (PL-SPP-2022-000016) - Withdrawn by Applicant 7.6.2023
>
Tim Furst Testimony 06.27.23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2023 3:08:28 PM
Creation date
6/29/2023 3:08:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Tim Furst <br /> To: WPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Re:Silber Special Permit Application PL-SPP-2022-000016 <br /> Date: Tuesday,June 27,2023 8:35:18 PM <br /> From:Timothy Furst,neighbor <br /> Re:Written Testimony for July 7th,2023 Windward Planning Commission Meeting <br /> I wish to follow up on my written testimony dated January 2,2023 <br /> to the Hawai'i County Planning Department and Windward Planning Commission <br /> On January 2,2023,I wrote: <br /> As noted in my earlier testimony(submitted October 31,2022),my primary concern is about traffic on Lolia Place caused by the operation of Hawaii Eco Retreat(formerly <br /> Lolia Ecovillage and Event Center.) <br /> On Page 4 of the PD Recommendation Report it says: <br /> "(B)The desired use would not adversely affect surrounding properties" <br /> "The applicant anticipates a maximum of 20-25 vehicular trips to the property on any given day." <br /> It then goes on to say <br /> "The applicant also proposes to provide on-site parking for 30 vehicles for non-retreat guests." <br /> It appears to me that parking for 30 vehicles for"non-retreat guests",plus the retreat guests,plus staff and volunteers,would result in far more than a maximum of 20-25 <br /> vehicular trips on any given day. <br /> Furthermore,because this would be in addition to the vehicular traffic from water trucks,construction vehicles,and the residents of two subdivisions,I believe that this proposal <br /> WILL adversely affect surrounding properties. <br /> I recently saw a"For Sale"listing for this property that says: <br /> "Located at the top of the subdivision we have a parking lot that accommodates 20+cars as well as space for 100+ <br /> cars alongside the 600' gravel driveway between the parking lot and the paved road" <br /> <<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KD2A vdpAdF5d_4GBe3pb_sDRCW10GAMUKcr4Y3XrU/mobilebasic>> <br /> This implies that it would be possible to have more than 120 cars on the property at any given time,which far exceeds what is stated in the permit <br /> application: <br /> "The applicant anticipates a maximum of 20-25 vehicular trips to the property on any given day." <br /> "The applicant also proposes to provide on-site parking for 30 vehicles for non-retreat guests." <br /> If the Special Permit application is approved,this disparity makes me think that whoever is operating the retreat center may not abide by the terms of <br /> the permit. <br /> On January 2,2023,I also wrote: <br /> On Page 6 of the PD Recommendation Report it says: <br /> "According to DOH,since the subject property has uupeimitted buildings and unapproved individual wastewater systems in violation of Chapter 11-62,HRS,the Wastewater <br /> Branch highly recommends non-issuance of the special permit rmtil all building and wastewater system violations are resolved." <br /> On October 12,2022,John Pipan of Land Planning Hawaii LLC wrote a letter to Mr Honda at the State of Hawaii Department of Health in which he <br /> states: <br /> "The composting toilet system and shower graywater disposal system were not approved by DOH.The applicant has <br /> decommissioned these systems and will install approved septic system(s)to replace them should the Special Permit be <br /> approved." <br /> I find this statement by Mr Pipan troubling for two reasons: <br /> 1)DOH recommends that the special permit not be approved until the wastewater system violations are resolved,but Mr Pipan responds that the <br /> violations will only be resolved if the special permit is approved,without any guarantee that they would actually be brought up to code. <br /> 2)As of February 2023,four months after Mr Pipan's letter,the composting toilets and the showers served by a greywater disposal system had <br /> NOT been decommissioned and were still in active use. <br /> I know this first hand because in February 2023 I visited the subject property at the invitation of Mr Silber. When I needed to go to the toilet,I was <br /> directed to the composting toilets which were still in use,and while there I witnessed a staff member or guest using the unpermitted showers. <br /> I do not know if Mr Silber informed Mr Pipan that the composting toilets and showers had been decommissioned and Mr Pipan conveyed that <br /> information to the Department of Health without verifying it,or whether Mr Pipan was aware that the composting toilets and showers were still in use <br /> when he wrote his letter,but whatever the source of the false statement to DOH it has made me lose trust that Mr Silber and Mr Pipan will abide by <br /> whatever conditions the County might impose on a Special Permit <br /> Thank you for your consideration <br /> Timothy Furst <br /> 4207 1st Ave NW <br /> Seattle,WA 98107 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.