My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-30 Bill 121 Doug Howell
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-02 Windward Continuance Meeting
>
#5 County Council Initiated - Bill 121 (PL-CCI-2024-000003)
>
Additional Info Provided to Commissioners at 5-2-24 Hearing
>
2024-04-30 Bill 121 Doug Howell
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2024 10:14:02 AM
Creation date
4/30/2024 10:14:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Description
Bill 121 Doug Howell
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Doug Howell <br /> To: W PCtesti mons <br /> Subject: Bills 121&123 <br /> Date: Tuesday,April 30,2024 8:10:45 AM <br /> Aloha Chairman Lin and all members of the Windward Planning Commission-, <br /> I am writing to express my concerns about Hawaii Bill 121 and its potential impact on our local communities.I <br /> believe the proposed regulations are a knee-jerk reaction which will not solve the main problem,which I see as <br /> affordability.The far-reaching implications of these laws have not been fully considered,and if passed,would be a <br /> tragedy for our county and its diverse residents. <br /> As a resident of Kea'au,I have witnessed firsthand the benefits that short-term rentals bring to Puna,not only in <br /> terms of economic growth but also in fostering a sense of aloha and community among visitors and residents alike. <br /> Two of my primary concerns are(1)the lack of data supporting the need for such stringent regulations,and(2)the <br /> cost of the almost certainly resulting litigation should it become law.It seems that the bill is being pushed forward <br /> without a thorough understanding of its potential consequences on homeowners and the local economy.Therefore,I <br /> urge the Planning Commission to recommend conducting an economic impact study before even considering new <br /> regulations.This study would provide valuable insights into how Bill 121 could affect our community and allow for <br /> more informed decision-making. <br /> The bill's proposed requirements,such as the affidavit requirement and invasive registration processes,pose <br /> significant challenges for homeowners.These requirements not only infringe on private property rights(making <br /> future litigation likely)but also create unnecessary burdens for those trying to comply with the law.I believe that <br /> streamlining the registration process and removing the affidavit requirement would be beneficial steps towards a <br /> more equitable and manageable system. <br /> The bill's approach to regulating where hosts live in relation to their guests is overly restrictive and fails to consider <br /> the diverse living arrangements that exist within our community.I recommend that the Planning Commission <br /> advocate for the removal of restrictions about where hosts live and where guests stay,as long as the owner is in the <br /> same building,on the same parcel,or on an adjacent parcel. <br /> According to the legislation's own website(hicountytar.consider.it),the results are already in:respondents <br /> overwhelmingly approve of Transient Accommodation Rentals.They overwhelmingly disagree that TARS take <br /> away from housing opportunities.They overwhelmingly agree that TARS add to the LOCAL economy.Please read <br /> the website you created for the purpose of getting community feedback,and you'll see very clearly what your <br /> constituents think about the proposed legislation. <br /> Since one of our—and your—biggest concerns is the impact of the proposed laws on our area's economy,please <br /> consider who benefits from the income you propose to eliminate.In the case of Puna rentals,the income goes in <br /> large part to local service providers such as cleaners,yard maintenance workers,handyman services,local markets <br /> and restaurants,pest control,and the list goes on.Not to mention that visitors who stay in Puna purchase many of <br /> their daily living necessities in Puna,in their LOCAL district,rather than adding to the bottom line of out-of-state <br /> corporations. <br /> Our state and county depend on tourists to survive.The rentals threatened by the TAR legislation make up an <br /> important part of Hawaii County's tourist housing portfolio.Or does the county only want to accept elite travelers? <br /> I have believed that Hawaii stands for diversity,not only in race,religion and other social areas but in economic <br /> level.The visitors who may one day make our'ohana the strongest may be the poorest.What options will we <br /> provide for them?What options for the agri-tourists who are drawn to Hawai`i's 'aina-friendly environment and <br /> way of life?We should be helping our renters to become the best renters in the world,not strangling their ability to <br /> show aloha to strangers. <br /> We know people who are renting to Hawaii residents who are in transition and need affordable,short-term housing. <br /> Where will they find it if this legislation passes? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.