My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-03 Testimony Megan Issac
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-22 Leeward Continuance Meeting
>
Item #9 County Council Initiated Bill 123 (PL-CCI-2024-000005)
>
Testimonies 03-31-2024 thru 05-21-24
>
2024-04-03 Testimony Megan Issac
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2024 12:37:21 PM
Creation date
5/10/2024 1:35:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
4/3/2024
Description
Testimony given at WPC 4-4-24 hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(9 Cof!j DNL-i h1t9 (klyl I SS (LC <br />ITCrI -� <br />Date: 4/3/24 <br />To: Windward Planning Commission <br />From: Megan Isaac Magdalene, Hilo resident and STR Operator (12 years) <br />INITIATOR: COUNTY COUNCIL (PL -CCI -2024-000005) Bill 123, an ordinance <br />amending Chapter 19, Article 1 and Article 13, Chapter 23, Article 9, and <br />Chapter 25, Article 1, Article 2, Article 5, and Article 6 of the Hawaii County <br />Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as amended), relating to 'ohana dwelling units. <br />Removes each instance of the term "Ohana dwelling" from the County Code <br />and inserts the term "accessory dwelling unit" and adds provisions for the <br />establishment of an accessory dwelling unit. <br />Aloha Commission members: <br />I feel that Bill 123 represents an example of cultural misappropriation of the worst <br />kind. <br />It seems that there is no reason to change the language used. This reflects a time <br />honored tradition here of family taking care of one another and living together. <br />This is a reprehensible bill and we have heard no good case for why this is <br />necessary . <br />By removing 'Ohana' from the language of the Planning Departments description <br />of additional dwellings on the property the Council is proposing to erase important <br />cultural values. <br />In the hard times we are facing with higher living costs, it will be important for <br />individuals and for farmers to retain all natural rights and property rights and to be <br />able to cohabit with family or extended family. This should have no interference <br />from any branch of legislature nor from any Planning Division policy makers. <br />I strongly oppose this bill. It is very flawed and it is unjustified. Please do not <br />recommend that this bill moves forward. <br />Mahalo, <br />Megan Isaac Magdalene <br />�R,c• `d a =8 by�, <br />lid ._._ Read <br />COPY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.