Laserfiche WebLink
<br />From:Ann Williams <br />To:WPCtestimony <br />Subject:Testimony On Hawaii General Plan 2045 <br />Date:Tuesday, October 29, 2024 2:49:51 AM <br />To Whom It May Concern: <br />This General Plan needs to be thrown out and redone! <br />Here are a some reasons why: <br />It is too vague. The language is not clear what the plan wishes to accomplish. <br />There are MANY concerning sections that sound like rights, freedoms, and <br />property are at risk with this plan. <br />Page 111, section 17.4: "Land use application shall identify as early as <br />possible any existing or potential active living corridors that should <br />be incorporated into the counties open space network." This sounds like you'll <br />be looking at people's property to take for open space because they apply for <br />land use. That is not Pono and is an invasion of privacy! <br />2.2 Biocultural Stewardship Goal (1.13): "Incentive private land management <br />practices that enhance natural resources and values and when <br />appropriate pursue the acquisitions of lands for the protections of natural <br />resources." We've seen your incentives like the tax incentives on Maui, which <br />is costing people thousands if they don't do what the government wants. You <br />want to acquire land to protect natural resources and values. Who gets to <br />decide what are natural resources and values? Whose values are they? Why <br />do you think it's your right to "pursue" acquiring someone's private property?!! <br />You have an entire section on climate change that looks to take away many <br />freedoms and rights. Did you know there are close to 2K credentialed <br />scientists from around the world that state there is no climate <br />danger? https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/ The reason for this <br />narrative is the change these policies will create will increase the pocket book <br />of investors in renewable energy as it reduces freedoms for the general <br />population. <br />Page 116, 19.7: "Concurrency reviews should incorporate reduction in <br />vehicle miles traveled to mitigate traffic impacts and achieve sustainability <br />and demand management goals." The Constitution says we have the right to <br />travel! It is not the right of the Planning department to "demand" that your <br />management goals reduce that right! Anything that reads, "Reduce vehicle <br />miles traveled" should be removed from this plan! <br /> <br />