Laserfiche WebLink
<br />From:Deva Chappell <br />To:WPCtestimony <br />Subject:Testimony On Hawaii General Plan 2045 (New Biz) <br />Date:Tuesday, October 29, 2024 6:59:03 AM <br />Greetings! These are my comments about Hawaii General Plan 2045: <br /> <br />We say this General Plan needs to be thrown out and redone! <br /> <br />Here are a some reasons why: <br />It is too vague. The language is not clear what the plan wishes to accomplish. There are MANY <br />concerning sections that sound like rights, freedoms, and property are at risk with this plan. <br />Page 111, section 17.4: "Land use application shall identify as early as possible any existing or <br />potential active living corridors that should be incorporated into the counties open space network." This <br />sounds like you'll be looking at people's property to take for open space because they apply for land <br />use. That is not Pono and is an invasion of privacy! <br />2.2 Biocultural Stewardship Goal (1.13): "Incentive private land management practices that enhance <br />natural resources and values and when appropriate pursue the acquisitions of lands for the <br />protections of natural resources."We've seen your incentives like the tax incentives on Maui, which is <br />costing people thousands if they don't do what the government wants. You want to acquire land to <br />protect natural resources and values. Who gets to decide what are natural resources and values? <br />Whose values are they? Why do you think it's your right to "pursue" acquiring someone's private <br />property?!! <br />You have an entire section on climate change that looks to take away many freedoms and rights. Did <br />you know there are close to 2K credentialed scientists from around the world that state there is no <br />climate danger? https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/ The reason for this narrative is the change <br />these policies will create will increase the pocket book of investors in renewable energy as it reduces <br />freedoms for the general population. <br />Page 116, 19.7: "Concurrency reviews should incorporate reduction in vehicle miles traveled to <br />mitigate traffic impacts and achieve sustainability and demand management goals." The Constitution <br />says we have the right to travel! It is not the right of the Planning department to "demand" that your <br />management goals reduce that right! Anything that reads, "Reduce vehicle miles traveled" should be <br />removed from this plan! <br />Please take a look at this pdf that shares a lot more issues with this general plan. <br />https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/_files/ugd/86fc0c_b34739e4c99c461685de4c0207bf286e.pdf <br /> <br />This General Plan must be redone with the people and the feature keiki in mind, which this plan does <br />not do! <br /> <br />Thank you for your time on this! <br /> <br />