Laserfiche WebLink
From: Michelle Melendez <br /> To: WPCtestimony; LPCtestimonv;Council Testimony; Kimball, Heather; Kaaiwada.Jennifer;Onishi. Dennis; <br /> Kierkiewicz,Ashley; Kanealii-Kleinfelder, Matt;Villeaas, Rebecca;Galimba. Michelle M.; Inaba. Holeka; Hustace, <br /> James; Planning Internet Mail <br /> Subject: Testimony against the GP(The gavel was not needed) <br /> Date: Saturday,January 18,2025 9:44:35 AM <br /> Aloha Planning Commissions, <br /> I'm a bit in shock and confused. Every meeting for over 6-months has had everyone, except <br /> two in this last meeting, telling you not to put this plan through and you are still moving <br /> forward with it and only recommending certain words be added or changed. <br /> Do you work for the people or the "State"? <br /> Is this only a dog and pony show? <br /> Do the people not have power to tell you what we want and it be followed not just heard? <br /> This is very concerning. <br /> The General Plan Manager said the source of "Climate Change" was given to her by the <br /> "authority of the State". Nowhere in the General Plan does it say that. <br /> She said she has a 3-page document that shows the source of climate change. Again, <br /> these 3 pages are not in the General Plan. I could not find them. <br /> The following is not a threat. It is a fact. <br /> The Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 710, outlines criminal offenses related to the <br /> use of false statements or entries, including making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, <br /> considered a class C felony. Again, not a threat, a fact! <br /> You make us raise our right hand and swear to tell the truth. Why don't you do the same for <br /> the General Plan manager? <br /> "Climate change" or really climate danger is the foundation of the entire plan and if it is <br /> false, which it is, then the entire plan should NOT be recommended. It cannot go through <br /> based on a false premise and could be considered a felony since it is a false claim. That is <br /> a fact, not a threat. <br /> How does the "State" have more expertise on climate change than experts in the climate <br /> field who are saying around the world that there is no climate danger. Where is their <br /> source? <br />