My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-09-03 PL-CCI-2025-000012 Testimony from Jim and Lichun McMahon
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-09-04 - Windward
>
Item #10 County Council (PL-CCI-2025-000012)
>
2025-09-03 PL-CCI-2025-000012 Testimony from Jim and Lichun McMahon
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2025 2:59:18 PM
Creation date
9/3/2025 2:59:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
9/3/2025
Description
Email testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Jim and Lichun <br /> To: W PCtesti mono <br /> Subject: Public Testimony: PL-CCI-2025-000012/Bill 63 0 WPC Sept 4,2025 meeting agenda item#10 <br /> Date: Wednesday,September 3, 2025 12:01:48 PM <br /> Please accept the following testimony in regards to the Windward Planning Commission <br /> meeting agenda item #10 (Sept 4, 2025) - County Council Initiated item PL-CCI-2025- <br /> 000012 County Council Bill 63 :- A bill for an ordinance to amend Chapter 25 (Zoning), <br /> Article 5 of the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as amended), relating to <br /> dwellings. The Zoning Code does not currently allow for dwellings to be located within the <br /> industrial-commercial mixed use (MCX) zoning districts. The purpose of this bill is to allow <br /> for dwellings to be established in the MCX zoning district. <br /> I can see some challenges associated with this proposed amendment to the allowable uses <br /> within the MCX zoned district: <br /> 1. <br /> An often cited reason justifying the issuance of special use permits in agriculturally <br /> zoned areas for both industrial and commercial uses is the lack of nearby suitably <br /> zoned parcels. Allowing residential uses within the MCX zones would therefore <br /> further reduce the available supply of these parcels for their originally intended <br /> purposes. <br /> 2. <br /> Infrastructure requirements for commercial, industrial, and residential uses are often <br /> very different. We shouldn't be developing a higher level of infrastructure typically <br /> required for commercial and industrial uses and then essentially down zone it for <br /> residential uses. <br /> 3. <br /> Many of the existing uses allowed in the MCX zones are less than ideal being <br /> situated in close proximity to residential dwellings. This would include many light <br /> identical uses such as automobile service centers, rental yards, etc. and commercial <br /> uses such as bars and nightclubs. Not ideal housing situations by any standard. <br /> Thanks and Best Regards <br /> Jim McMahon <br /> Papa`ikou <br /> Jim & Lichun <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.