Laserfiche WebLink
DeVera, Ashley <br /> From: Tavares, Sherilyn K. <br /> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 3:50 PM <br /> To: Ian R. Wesley-Smith; Planning Board of Appeals <br /> Cc: Patrick K. Wong; Pause, Stephen (Steve); Braman, Eva; Kekai, Malia; Agustin, Noah; <br /> SalasFerguson, Sinclair; Lactaoen, Kawehilani S <br /> Subject: RE: 1'O PROCESSING COMPANY INC (PL-BOA-2023-000065) Request for Issuance of <br /> Subpoena Duces Tecum <br /> Good afternoon, <br /> The Request for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum is DENIED, for several reasons: <br /> 1) If they are interpreting 3-9 of BOA rules of practice and procedure as this being of our duty or jurisdiction, they <br /> are misinterpreting the Rule. <br /> a. Their request does not identify a specific document, or part thereof, and does not then specify what in <br /> that document is material or relevant to their case. <br /> b. Even if this applied, they did not request it in the appropriate manner/form per Rule 3-9(c). <br /> c. Their second and third paragraphs outlining their request-copies of past and present policies and all <br /> decisions on agricultural exemptions from 2022-present-are beyond the scope of what the BOA has the <br /> authority to grant a subpoena request for. <br /> 2) They seem to be basically objecting to DPW's ROA&should file their objection as such. The deadline was <br /> provided in the Scheduling Order. <br /> 3) As a note, in the Kai LLC case, one of the exhibits Kai LLC had was a formal request they sent to DPW & in <br /> response, DPW furnished all emails and internal correspondence that was related to their project/TMK as it <br /> related to the specific permit#'s they were referencing with-in their appeal. The BOA has no authority to tell the <br /> Department to provide a general list of documents that may or may not be within their possession that has no <br /> relation to the specific matter before us. We are not the entity to determine the completeness, or lack thereof, <br /> of any generalized document request. <br /> What appears more appropriate for them is that they can go through the official legal route of a UIPA and make their <br /> request directly to the Department. The BOA cannot grant this type of request as we do not have the jurisdiction in <br /> which to do so. The request is DENIED. <br /> Please let me know if you have any questions. <br /> Have a great afternoon, <br /> Sheri <br /> From: Ian R. Wesley-Smith <iwesley-smith@carlsmith.com> <br /> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 11:37 AM <br /> To:Tavares, Sherilyn K. <Sherilyn.Tavares@hawaiicounty.gov>; Planning Board of Appeals <br /> <boardofappeals@hawaiicounty.gov> <br /> Cc: Patrick K. Wong<pwong@carlsmith.com>; Pause, Stephen (Steve) <Steve.Pause@hawaiicounty.gov>; Braman, Eva <br /> <Eva.Braman@hawaiicounty.gov>; Kekai, Malia <malia.kekai@hawaiicounty.gov>;Agustin, Noah <br /> <Noah.Agustin@hawaiicounty.gov>; SalasFerguson, Sinclair<Sinclair.SalasFerguson@hawaiicounty.gov>; Lactaoen, <br /> Kawehilani S<KawehilaniS.Lactaoen@hawaiicounty.gov> <br /> Subject: RE: 1'0 PROCESSING COMPANY INC (PL-BOA-2023-000065) Request for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum <br /> Ms. Sherilyn, <br /> 1 <br />