My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-21 Leeward Exh C - Zoning Code Sirens
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-04-21 Leeward Exh C - Zoning Code Sirens
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:59:23 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:59:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING DIRECTOR INITIATED AMENDMENT <br />A regularly advertised hearing on the <br />TO CHAPTER 25, RELATING TO ADDITION OF CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS TO <br />CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS <br />was called to order at 1:07 p.m. in the West Hawaii Civic <br />Center, Community Center, Building G, 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hi <br />Hawaii, with Chair Geraldine Giffin presiding. <br />COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Geraldine Giffin, Brandi Beaudet, Lani Bo <br />Hickcox, Wayne Iokepa and Richard Nelson <br />ABSENT AND EXCUSED: Thomas Whittemore <br />STAFF PRESENT: Julie Mecklenburg (Deputy Corporation Counsel), M <br />(Deputy Planning Director), Daryn Arai (Planning Program Manager <br />and Maija Cottle (Staff Planner) <br />And one person from the public in attendance. <br />INITIATOR: PLANNING DIRECTOR INITIATED <br />Amendment to Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2, Division 4, Section <br />Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as amended) relating to the Addition of <br />. <br />Concurrency Requirements <br />GIFFIN: We are on Agenda Item No. 3. And this is relating to the <br />to concurrency requirements. Daryn? <br />ARAI: Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, Commissioners. Im going to t <br />think the background and recommendation report that we transmitt <br />why this bill is before you. Its different from the bill that y <br />down from the County Council, which previously tried to include <br />of tsunami sirens as part of plan approval, which is a departmen <br />you recall, the Director did not support that bill, and the Plan <br />Windward, voted to send an unfavorable recommendation. That bill <br />its awaiting this bill that the administration put together for <br />in the installation of tsunami sirens as a requirement of concur <br />has undertaken efforts to install sirens at locations throughout <br />that matter, but the amount of monies that have been secured wou <br />are needed to provide adequate coverage. <br />That being said, a concurrency requirement basically specifies t <br />not be approved, if it would cause levels of service of public f <br />baseline. What this proposed bill is attempting to do is basical <br />tsunami siren, then a proposed rezoning or time extension for th <br />requirement shall not be considered, or shall not be approved. I <br />EXH <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.