Laserfiche WebLink
<br />KAILUA VILLAGE DESIGN COMMISSION <br />COUNTY OF HAWAI‘I <br />MINUTES <br />MEETING DATE: January 11, 2011 <br />TIME: 5:15 p.m. <br />PLACE: Mayor’s Conference Room aka Hanama 1 <br />75-5706 Kuakini Highway, Suite 103 <br />Kailua-Kona, Hawai‘i 96740 <br />ROLL CALL <br />1. Members Present: Shane Kitchens, Paul Bleck, Nancy Burns, Stephen Herbert, <br />Ann Kern,and Eugene Power <br />2. Absent and Excused: Riley Saito and Cindy Coats <br />3. Applicants:Chad Raymond of John Allen Sign Co. for listed landowners; John Totah for <br />listed landowners <br />4. Planning Department:Bennett Mark, Rosalind Newlon and Keola Childs <br />5. Public: None attended. <br />Chair Kitchens called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m., welcomed those in attendance, led an <br />introduction of the commissioners, and explained the role of the Commission and the meeting <br />procedures. <br />STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS <br />None. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />1. Design review of a sign permit application for an awning sign for Sunglass Hut. Applicant: <br />John Allen Sign Company, LLC. Land Owners: Crellin, Louise S. Trust, Kona MP LLC. <br />Von Platen Luder Hugo Trust, Von Platen Luder Shirley Trust. TMK: 7-5-007:005. <br />Located at 75-5729 Ali‘i Drive, Kailua-Kona, HI., at the Kona Market Place approximately <br />85 feet south of Sarona Road. <br />Ms. Newlon oriented the commissioners to the subject site by map reference, and described <br />the site including land area, existing buildings and other principal improvements. She <br />described the proposed awning sign, which would replace existing signage for this <br />business, by the sign’s dimension, coloration, letter size, and placement.She explained <br />that according to the Sign Code, the sign is considered to be a marqueesign. Ms. Newlon <br />said the proposed sign appeared to meet the sign criteria Guidelines for Review set forth in <br />the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona, but under a new interpretation of sign area calculation <br />methodology from the Department of Public Works (DPW) Building Division, the <br />proposed sign does not comply with the County's Sign Code as to maximum allowable <br />area. She explained the new interpretation uses the entire area of the awning face as <br />comprising the sign area, rather than just the area taken by the lettering and any logos. <br />1 <br /> <br />