Laserfiche WebLink
From: Claudia Rohr <br /> To: WPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Testimony in Opposition to Bill 122 for an Ordinance amending the Zoning Code <br /> Date: Tuesday,April 2,2024 10:09:03 AM <br /> Aloha Chair and Planning Commissioners- <br /> I oppose Bill 122, for an ordinance repealing Bed and Breakfasts as a permitted use <br /> in the Zoning Code. <br /> The purpose of Bill 122 is to eliminate an existing, effective regulatory framework for <br /> hosted transient accommodations rentals which includes a public hearing and is <br /> substantially more comprehensive than the regulatory framework proposed by Bill <br /> 121. <br /> Bill 122 is an arbitrary government zoning action which has no substantial relation to <br /> the public health, safety, morals or general welfare required by HRS §46-4 County <br /> zoning. It cannot be said it is even an effective work reduction action ("a way to help <br /> sort of alleviate the demand for additional work by the Planning Department") See transcript <br /> of January 23, 2023 meeting of Policy Committee on Planning, Land Use, and Development, <br /> Page 33: hApS7Hrecords.hawaii county,gov/weblink/DocView.as <br /> dbid=0&id=1073059&page=1&cr=1 <br /> Section 25-4-7. Bed and breakfast establishments, and related sections should stand in place <br /> because they will still regulate existing permitted bed and breakfasts. The Council has made it <br /> clear that existing permitted bed and breakfasts are not subject to Bill 121 registration <br /> requirements, and the permit continues to run with the land (although there is no clear <br /> language to that effect in either Bill). <br /> My concern is that the public and the Planning Department is going to misinterpret Bills 121 <br /> and 122 otherwise. The Planning Department suggested an amendment to Bill 121 to state <br /> existing permitted bed and breakfasts are legal (not exempt). The regulations regulating <br /> existing permitted bed and breakfasts will be lost. <br /> Please consider what the County Council members stated about Bill 122: <br /> MS. KIMBALL: Thank you. <br /> This is part of the whole conversation around TAR's. Basically, what we're <br /> looking at without this repeal is four different mechanisms by which people can <br /> register a transient accommodation. On balance, registering as a TAR, as <br /> an operator-hosted or an owner-hosted, should be simpler than the bed-and- <br /> breakfast process. And I think some of our folks out here talked about they had to <br /> get all the permits put together, they had to go through the Planning Commission. <br /> It is a one-and-done process, but it is much more complicated than what we're <br /> looking at for the TAR registration. So, since we're already doing the <br /> hosted and the operator-hosted under the TAR, like let's just get rid of bed-and- <br /> breakfast and not <br /> have four things. Just do three. <br /> With that said,I will reiterate in case people missed it. If you have an existing <br />