My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-02-17 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Teresa San Miguel Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-06 Windward Special Meeting
>
Public Testimonies 2-17-24 thru 5-3-24
>
2024-02-17 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Teresa San Miguel Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 1:36:57 PM
Creation date
4/10/2024 1:36:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Description
2024-03-12 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Teresa San Miguel Opposition Testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Ouihano,Chasitv <br /> To: WPCtestimony <br /> Subject: FW: punalu'u development <br /> Date: Tuesday, March 12,2024 4:33:34 PM <br /> From: Mom San Miguel <mom.sanmiguel@gmail.com> <br /> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 12:07 PM <br /> To: Council Testimony<counciltestimony@hawaiicounty.gov> <br /> Subject: punalu'u development <br /> Hello council members! <br /> am writing in opposition to the proposed development, by Eva Liu, for the Punalu'u <br /> area. My reasons are as follows: <br /> 1)the environmental impacts would be enormous, and are not clearly addressed . <br /> Upkeep of grounds around the project do not appear to have any stipulations <br /> regarding the use of herbicides,which are commonly used in other ocean side <br /> developments on the island. Increased noise from people and vehicles is going to <br /> disturb the honu as they gather in the spot they've chosen. Tour buses,which are <br /> required to leave the diesel engines running in order to keep the AC going while some of <br /> the riders choose to remain seated on the bus during tour stops, will be gassing out the <br /> entire area with diesel fumes. Tourists are notably insensitive to the damage they cause <br /> by gathering natural elements (like rocks) as souvenirs, leaving trash, and poisoning the <br /> water with toxic sunscreens. These are just a few examples. <br /> 2)the size and scope of the proposed development seems geared more towards <br /> attracting tourism and making use by residents more difficult. <br /> Any economic benefits to local residents would be based on low payingjobs- <br /> working the gift store, mowing lawns, etc. , without any true long term opportunities for <br /> career development. <br /> As a tourist destination, the site would normally involve input and regulation by state <br /> and county agencies overseeing things like traffic control, hours of operation, gates, <br /> lighting, parking fees, and so on. All of which would make the natural beauty difficult for <br /> area residents to access. <br /> Educational opportunities,while somewhat addressed as part of a package for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.