My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-30 Annette O'Toole
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-02-20 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2024-12-19 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
LPC Testimony 11/22 - 12/19 Draft GP 2045 (50) (12/19 LPC Meeting)
>
2024-11-30 Annette O'Toole
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 6:41:04 AM
Creation date
2/7/2025 1:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/30/2024
Description
2024-11-30 Annette O'Toole
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: ascendingstarseed <br />To: WPCtestimony; LPCtestimony <br />Subject: Revise Hawaii General Plan Testimony Here <br />Date: Saturday, November 30, 2024 12:24:11 PM <br />Aloha Commissioners, <br />The Big island Plan cannot go through the way it is designed. It is hard to believe any local helped <br />design this plan. <br />Here are some concerns: <br />• There is a huge part of the plan dedicated to "Climate Change". However, why do most <br />experts state there is NO climate danger? Climate Experts Speak Out Against Climate <br />Danger Click Here! <br />• The word "Stakeholder," defined in the plan, is written 86 times and literally means anyone <br />in the entire world can have input on this plan. <br />• Please recommend Stakeholder change to the following: "Local Communities". Local <br />Communities are local Big Island farmers, homeowners, renters, organizations, businesses, <br />and individuals who live on Big Island or have property on Big Island that will be personally <br />affected by projects, decisions, or activities in the general plan. Effective local community <br />engagement and management are crucial for the success and sustainability of any initiative, <br />as it helps ensure that diverse perspectives and interests are considered. <br />• The OSCER Department in the plan will null and void all public input and leave decisions to <br />unelected officials. This is NOT okay! This department should not be created. This is on <br />page 188, 40.8. <br />• The Planning Department has sent out letters too many homeowners telling them their land <br />use will be changed from resident to recreation due to the General Plan 2045. This will <br />drastically lower their property value and opens the door to rezone the area. This is not <br />pono. It breaks the Aloha Spirit law § 5-7.5. To reduce someone's property value is not <br />okay. This must be made pono again. <br />• There is a huge section on climate change and things that will be affected. This needs to be <br />further researched. There are over 1900 credentialed scientist that say there is no climate <br />danger. Here is the pdf showing the scientist and what country they are from. <br />https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/WCD-241023.pdf John Coleman, the first <br />weather man for Good Morning America and the Founder of the Weather Channel has gone <br />on CNN and other media outlets stating, "There is no climate danger". He explain the reason <br />for this narrative is the investors, in renewable energy, want to make these changes. <br />• Hilo does not have a Community Development Plan. How can a Big Island General Plan <br />move forward without that? Hilo is 22% of the island. <br />• 1.13 under "Increase the biodiversity and resilience of native habitats" reads, "Incentivize <br />private land management practices that protect and enhance natural resource values and, <br />when appropriate, pursue the acquisition of lands for the protection of natural resources." <br />"Incentives" mean more taxes. "Protection" means more rules. Who's "values" is this plan <br />referring too because it's not the locals? "Pursue the acquisition of lands" does this say they <br />are going to pursing taking people's private property? Again with "protection of natural <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.