Laserfiche WebLink
condition that the, the applicant needs to follow all federal, state, and county laws, and those <br />things. But I understand what you're saying. Keeping them in there, if we can have something <br />else to point, too, should there, we have anything come up in the future, then that, it's not a <br />problem for us. <br />VITOUSEK: Yeah, and I think they can be edited a little bit just to indicate, particularly for <br />Condition O, that instead of the condition being that they prepare these mitigation plans, the <br />condition should be that they comply with the mitigation plans. <br />CARR SMITH: Where is that in the paragraph? <br />VITOUSEK: It says, "The appropriate Preservation Plan, Data Recovery Plan, [and] Monitoring <br />Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the [State] Department of Land and Natural Resources," <br />the second sentence. "Burial Treatment Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the Hawaii <br />Island Burial Council for review and approval." So that's already been done but, you know, <br />instead of indicating that it needs to be done, it should indicate that they should be complied <br />with. <br />KAY: Mike, would it make sense then, I guess we'd keep the identification on what the plans <br />are and then have a sentence that basically says the applicant shall comply with all of the <br />preceding plans, you know, all of the conditions of the preceding plans or something like that? <br />Would that satisfy what you're talking about there? <br />VITOUSEK: Yeah, that would be my recommendation, for sure. <br />KAY: And that was for O. Did you have any other language for N or just keep it as it was? <br />Because it was, it was completed prior and submitted prior plans, for final plan approval. So we <br />can do the same thing— <br />VITOUSEK: Yeah, same thing. It's a, it says that the archaeological inventory survey should be <br />prepared and submitted to get approval. I think that it should say that the archaeological <br />inventory, that the commitments made in the archaeological inventory survey plan should be <br />adhered to. <br />KAY: Can we say, "shall?" Mike— <br />VITOUSEK: What was that? <br />KAY: —can we say, "shall?" <br />VITOUSEK: Yeah, mm-hmm. <br />KAY: Okay, thank you. <br />CARR SMITH: So do we need some clarity for Noriko's sake on this? How would N read, <br />Mike? Go ahead. <br />10 <br />DRAFT <br />