COM 1019.001 2018-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

VITOUSEK: An updated archaeological inventory surveyoh, hold on one second, let me try to work it out here. I would say that the commitments made -instead of "an updated"—the commitments made in the Archaeological Inventory Survey approved by the Historic Preservation Division, or by the State Department Land and Natural Resources - Historic Preservation Division, shall be adhered to throughout the construction process, or development, or permit life, or whatever the case may be. CARR SMITH: Is that clear? Sid, are you okay with that? FUKE: - - - I'm muting myself. That's fine. CARR SMITH: Christian? KAY: Yeah, understood, and we're okay with that. CARR SMITH: Okay. Do we need any more clarity on O or are we simply replacing "prepared and submitted" to "shall be compliant?" KAY: Yeah, I mean, we can, we can look at, we can list the, the subsequent archaeological plans that took place, that grew out of the AIS, and essentially just make a statement that all of the, the requirements within these documents shall be complied with for the life of the permit, or something like that. But this is a Change of Zone, so through the life of the development or something to that effect. CARR SMITH: Are you okay with that, Sid? CARR SMITH: Sid, is that acceptable to the applicant? FUKE: Yeah, in summary, like, what I understand is like, what Commissioner Vitousek is saying is totally understandable, because you can have like an approved AIS, or data recovery plan and if it never gets implemented if it gets implemented, then that's fine but if it doesn't get implemented and say you're 20 years down the road, archaeological protocols may change and all that stuff, so do you want to necessarily be married to something that may no longer be applicable. And I think what—and correct me, if I'm wrong, Commissioner VitousekI think what the intent is, is basically to say that, you know, if you don't develop and at that point in time if there's a need to update it, you know, to address current archaeological protocols, then it has to be done and you have to adjust your plans accordingly. Is that what you're getting at? VITOUSEK: No, basically what I'm saying is that if, if the language in the conditioning applying to the permit is removed, then the County has no teeth to enforce the compliance with these mitigation plans. So basically, you've got burial treatment plans and preservation plans that have established buffers around the historic sites in the area. If we have that, you know, saying that compliance with those buffers is a condition of the County permit, then if the 11 DRAFT