Laserfiche WebLink
developer proposes, or goes in and encroaches on one of the buffers, they would be in violation <br />of SHPD, but they wouldn't necessarily be in violation of the issues of the permit. So basically, <br />we just want to make sure that the permit document is sufficient to enforce the protection of <br />these cultural resources. <br />FUKE: Essentially to enable the County to enforce it. <br />VITOUSEK: Yes. <br />FUKE: And—yeah, then that's fine. I totally understand. <br />KEALOHA: So, Mike, would the appropriate language be, "maintain compliance with?" <br />VITOUSEK: Yes. Yeah, I think "maintaining compliance with the provisions of the approved <br />mitigation plans." <br />KEALOHA: Correct, correct. That may be more clear. <br />VITOUSEK: Yeah. <br />CARR SMITH: Good. Thanks, you guys. Any other questions or concerns? [None.] Okay, <br />then we'll move along <br />VITOUSEK: Oh, one last question. <br />CARR SMITH: Sure, go ahead. <br />VITOUSEK: The SMA permit. When is the expiration on that? <br />KAY: I don't have the permit in front of me, Mike, I apologize. I don't, I don't believe there <br />was an expiration date. I think a lot of cases where you have an SMA in conjunction with the <br />rezone, the SMA speaks to just complying with the conditions of the rezone. So, Jeff, I don't <br />know if you've got that readily available, or Sid, I don't know if you could address that. <br />FUKE: I can confirm what he said. That's true; the time was, the time for the SMA was <br />piggybacked to the Change of Zone. <br />VITOUSEK: Okay, so in this case, we're extending both the SMA and the rezoning ordinance. <br />Is that right? In essence? <br />KAY: If you'll give me a moment, I can, I can find that information. I think Jeff may have <br />stepped away to look it up as well, but let me double check on that, and I'll give you the exact <br />language. <br />CARR SMITH: Thank you, Christian. <br />12 <br />DRAFT <br />