Laserfiche WebLink
Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />County of Hawaii <br />Page 3 <br />The applicant has also paid their water commitment fee pursuant to Condition B for <br />sixty (60) units of water through July 31, 2020. The director is recommending the addition of <br />a condition requiring the applicant to maintain valid water commitments to support the <br />proposed use until the water facilities charges are paid in full. <br />In addition, prior to being granted Final Plan Approval (FPA) in 2012, the applicants <br />obtained six (6) affordable housing credits (Condition Q) and paid fair share (Condition R) <br />for the proposed 29 -unit development. The director is recommending retaining the affordable <br />housing condition and amending the fair share condition to ensure that the appropriate <br />requirements are met should the applicant develop at a residential density higher than 29 - <br />units. <br />The applicant secured a five (5) -year administrative time extension to 2019, but after <br />finalizing the archaeological mitigation plans the applicant indicated that they would have <br />only had two (2) years to complete construction of the project by the deadline. Moreover, the <br />applicant stated that they were having difficulty obtaining the necessary financing to <br />complete the project. However, with much of the "soft" work done and the uptick in the <br />economy, the applicant believes they can secure the required financing to complete the <br />construction plans and develop the project within the next five (5) years. <br />Granting of the amendments would not be contrary to the original reasons for <br />granting the change of zone. The reasons for granting the original change of zone under <br />Ordinance No. 09 159 have not changed. The RM -30 zoning remains consistent with the <br />LUPAG designation and goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan. The site is served <br />by appropriate infrastructure such as water, wastewater, access, and essential utilities. There <br />are no irresolvable geological or topographical problems which cannot be rectified, or which <br />would render the land unusable. Finally, plans to mitigate impacts on archaeological/cultural <br />sites and resources have been approved and will be implemented through the development of <br />the property. <br />Granting of the amendments would not be contrary to the General Plan or <br />Zoning Code. Since the subject parcel was rezoned, there has not been any significant land <br />use regulatory change in this area. The Kona Community Development designates the <br />property to be within the "Kona Urban Area" and the current zoning (RM -30) continues to be <br />consistent with the General Plan's Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map. The <br />subject parcel and its immediate surrounding area are designated as Urban Expansion <br />(ue), which allows for a "mix of high density, medium density, low density, industrial, <br />