Laserfiche WebLink
Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />County of Hawaii <br />Page 12 <br />Despite the initial availability determination, water service for the project is not secured until such <br />time as an Extension Agreement is executed and Contribution in Aid of Construction is paid. Any <br />connections to WHWC systems are the responsibility of the developer/landowner. To date, the <br />applicant has not provided evidence that they have taken any of the steps outlined above to secure <br />water service for the proposed project. <br />Wastewater: Sewer connection is proposed to be provided by the West Hawaii Sewer <br />Company (WHSC), a privately -owned and managed utility certified by the Public Utilities <br />Commission of the State of Hawai `i, however, wastewater infrastructure is not currently available to <br />the project area. Prior to the proposed subdivision connecting to wastewater utility lines, the WHWC <br />will be required to obtain PUC approval to expand their service area as the proposed subdivision is <br />not currently within the WHWC service area. If PUC approval is granted the applicant or other entity <br />will be required to construct the appropriate utility connection along Waikoloa Road meeting design <br />standards approved by other State and County agencies. Staff notes the construction of a private <br />utility within the County ROW may trigger the need for an Environmental Assessment (EA) prior to <br />development. The applicant has not provided any indication the PUC is willing to approve the <br />increase in distribution area for wastewater service nor has the applicant provided any alternative <br />wastewater treatment plan should the PUC fail to support expanding the WHWC service area to this <br />proposed project site. <br />Transportation Systems: This application presents aproposal to create one (1) egress/ingress <br />into the proposed mixed-use development located on the subject parcel. To date, no Traffic Impact <br />Analysis Report (TIAR) was submitted as part of the application, and the applicant merely states that <br />the proposed development of 36 residential units and nine (9) commercial lots will not generate the <br />trips necessary to trigger a TIAR. The transportation facilities within Waikoloa Road, especially in <br />the vicinity of the Paniolo Drive intersection are becoming increasingly inadequate to support the <br />current and expected traffic conditions. Despite the applicant's proposed nine (9) -lot subdivision, the <br />requested CV -10 zoning designation (with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet) would permit a <br />maximum density of fifty (5 0) lots (excluding land area to be set aside for roads, sidewalks, etc.) and <br />would allow high intensity commercial uses beyond what is currently proposed. For this reason, the <br />Planning Department indicated in writing to the applicant that, "...the proposed uses trigger the need <br />for a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) per Section 25-2-46 (d) of Hawaii County Code <br />(Zoning Code)." If the change of zone were approved, the permitted level of development of the CV - <br />10 zoning designation would necessitate the need for a TIAR. Additionally, the applicant has <br />provided limited details on the specific type/style of commercial development and therefore requires <br />that the maximum zoning use of the subject parcel be considered during regulatory review. The <br />requirement of the TIAR is not triggered by the construction of the housing units exclusively, but by <br />the change of zone application itself. Pursuant to Hawaii County Code (HCC) 25-2-46(d(1), when <br />the number of trips depends upon the exact future uses of the site, and those uses are unknown at the <br />time of zoning amendment (e.g., types of commercial uses), the determination shall be based upon a <br />typical mix of uses found in that zoning type in the community. Furthermore, the Department of <br />