Laserfiche WebLink
Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />County of Hawaii <br />Page 5 <br />Furthermore, the PD zoning allows for the flexibility to develop any uses permitted either <br />directly or conditionally in the RS, RD, RM, RCX, CN, CG, CV or V districts provided, <br />that each of the proposed uses and the overall densities for residential and hotel uses are <br />contained in a master plan for the PD and in the PD enabling ordinance. <br />According to the CDP, the PD application process should further include the <br />development of a conceptual master plan to comprehensively address a mix of permitted <br />uses and density; street layout and standards, transit routes and facilities, and bike and <br />pedestrian pathways; village center public facilities; infrastructure requirements and <br />timing; neighborhood park and public space standards; a phasing plan; and calculation <br />and treatment of density transfer area, if any. Additionally, the Project District would <br />allow for an increase of permitted uses and densities versus the limitations of the existing <br />zoning. <br />The CDP also suggests the use of Village Design Guidelines (VDGs) as a guide to <br />the development of the conceptual master plan(s). The intent of VDGs is to ensure that <br />the TOD is comprehensively developed as a compact, mixed-use, pedestrian oriented <br />development intended to increase transit use and manage traffic congestion. The VDGs <br />encourage residences, shopping, employment and recreational uses located within close <br />proximity with each other and efficiently organized to provide for the daily needs of the <br />residents. The VDGs consider a range of housing types and affordability within <br />pedestrian -oriented, human -scale neighborhoods, incorporate natural features, open <br />space, and cultural features, provide efficient circulation systems for pedestrians, non - <br />motorized vehicles, and motorists and motorists that serve to functionally and physically <br />integrate various land use activities; and promote strong neighborhood identity and focus. <br />The applicant has argued that the existing land use plans submitted with the <br />amendment requests for the subject property and CN zoned property (Pua`a <br />Development) adjacent to the northeast (mauka) reflects the TOD concept by <br />incorporating a transit center on the commercially zoned property, providing roadway <br />connectivity, providing housing, addressing drainage and providing goods and services to <br />the proposed and immediately surrounding communities. <br />Since the adoption of the CDP, single -district zoning (e.g. RM/CN) is not <br />appropriate for development within a TOD. The CDP identifies the Project District <br />zoning district as the mechanism to achieve the mix of land uses and required densities to <br />support a Transit Oriented Development. Thus, retaining the existing zoning will not <br />allow the integrated approach required to develop the compact, walkable, mixed-use <br />village -style development recommended by the CDP for neighborhood village TODs. <br />