My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1077.001 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 1077.001 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2020 10:25:26 AM
Creation date
9/25/2020 10:18:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
1077
Point
001
Author
Michael Yee, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2020/10/06 (2018-2020)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VAN PERNIS: Is the fair share per the original ordinance, or - - -pay redetermined? <br />FUKE: - - - <br />CARR SMITH: Unmute, Sid. Here you go. <br />FUKE: Okay, yeah, so as far as the fair share, what is proposed is, it's not just the fair share, it's <br />pretty much like - - - all about the fair share requirements, like they were just going to adjust it - - - <br />fair share per unit, and also to allow for fair share credits for certain improvements, such as the new <br />mauka-makai road, and also to exempt any - - - on the site would.be exempt from the fair share <br />requirements, which I understand is current policy at this.point'in time. So we are not asking for any <br />further exemptions from fair share requirements, no. <br />CARR SMITH: Thank you. <br />VAN PERNIS: - - - been made? <br />CARR SMITH: Repeat that, Mark. ,p <br />VAN PERNIS: Can you answer yes 'or no whether a fair share payment is included in the proposal? <br />FUKE: I thought I answered,the question.. 'A short answer to the question is, yes; there is a fair <br />share component in the proposed.,amendmerits. <br />VAN PERNIS: And the -traffic study, why was-Lako Street, Henry Street, Sunset Drive and several <br />other intersections, Seaview,,..Circle.Kam, why were.,they not considered even though they are closer <br />to the subdivision; or the proposed development, than.;,the roads that were selected by Mr. Okaneku? <br />CARR SMITH: Randall, you want;to respond? ---,-You want to unmute your—yeah, go ahead. <br />OKANEKU: "'Oh, am I okay? Oh, as I; you know, stated earlier, that we need to make a limit to the <br />study area becauseF of the cost involved, basically. And generally what I do is to consult with the <br />State Department of Transportation to kind of give them a heads -up of what I'm doing, and they <br />x <br />would advise me ori 111b..study area, which intersections they want to see looked at. And that, that's <br />how we determined the size ofthe'study area for this particular traffic study. Like I said earlier, the <br />traffic dissipates as it goes,further away from the site; there is a network of streets where the traffic <br />would tend to just flow, soothe percentage gets smaller and smaller as you get further and further <br />away. <br />VAN PERNIS: Lako Street closer than the other streets you indicated? <br />OKANEKU: Lako Street is south of Kuakini Highway. <br />CARR SMITH: So, we've been told what- <br />32 <br />hat <br />32 <br />DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.