Laserfiche WebLink
Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />County of Hawaii <br />Page 6 <br />spaces. Additionally, in response to the Police Department's concerns, the applicant <br />indicated that they felt the amount of parking required in the Zoning Code would provide <br />sufficient on-site parking for the project. <br />While the Director supports the proposed affordable housing development, he <br />believes that the eighty (80) parking spaces required by the Zoning Code is likely <br />insufficient for the proposed development given the lack of on -street parking options in <br />the area. Moreover, the Director is sympathetic to the concerns of the Police Department <br />over possible impacts to their operations that may be caused by lack of adequate on-site <br />parking for the project. <br />The Director also recognizes that the current condition language requiring the <br />development of additional parking spaces, "...up to a maximum of 60% of the spaces for <br />the total residential units to be built within the proposed development" is ambiguous and <br />open to considerable interpretation and would like to provide clarity on the number of <br />additional parking spaces that should be provided. <br />Section 25-4-59.19(a) of the Zoning Code states, "The director may increase any <br />of the requirements in this chapter for parking spaces and loading spaces, after <br />reviewing the proposed use and the use's impact to the immediate area, if the director <br />makes a finding that the increase will further the public safety, convenience, and <br />welfare. "Based on the proposed use, the Director is making such a finding. <br />Based on the preceding, the Director is recommending to amend the condition to <br />require 1.8 parking spaces per unit, which would require 116 parking spaces, a number <br />similar to what was proposed in the applicant's conceptual site plan and roughly 45% of <br />the total spaces required by the Zoning Code. Finally, this updated requirement will only <br />apply should the project be developed as a 100% affordable housing project with rents <br />between 30% and 60% of Area Median Income (AMI) as represented by the applicant. <br />The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statues, <br />relating to Coastal Zone Management. The project site is located approximately V2 <br />mile from the nearest shoreline and is not situated within the SMA. Previous flora and <br />fauna surveys listed no, threatened, or endangered plant, mammalian or avian species <br />were found on the properties. A 2006 Archaeological Inventory Survey and September <br />2020 Archaeological Field Inspection determined the only historic or cultural resource on <br />the property is SHPD Site 25547, which SHPD confirmed requires no further work or <br />preservation. <br />According to the applicant, they have little flexibility in their budget to address <br />unanticipated costs through the development of the project. For that reason, they are <br />requesting deletion of the deletion of Condition J (Requirement to Install Streetlights and <br />